ML19259D392

Forwards Revised Contentions Per Conversations & Meetings W/ Nrc.Aslb Attention Is Drawn to 790727 Filing Which Stated That Case Should Be Dismissed

ML19259D392
Person / Time
Site:	New Haven
Issue date:	10/01/1979
From:	Daly H ECOLOGY ACTION OF OSWEGO
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19259D393	List: ML19259D392 ML19259D394
References
NUDOCS 7910180420
Download: ML19259D392 (1)

Text

p; A * .

Mil 0 Pimi,70 D90 MENT ROOM UNITED STATE OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of )

New York State Electric and Gas Co.) Docket No. STN 50-596-597 and Long Island Lighting Co. )

New Haven 1 and 2 ) October 1, 1979 To: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Euclosed plase find Ecology Action of Oswego's revised contentions, completed following converstions and meetings with the NRC Staff lawyers.

We regret the fact that the taxpayers had to pay for the time spent by the NRC lawyers on this case, and on the travel to Oswego for these lawyers last month to discuss the contentions, because the application was not yet dismissed. We fully expect that Case 8000A wil be dismissed on Oct. 12, 1979.

We would like to bring to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's attention our filing of July 27, 1979, where we stated:

"Since LILCO is clearly not a viable co-applicant, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board must follow immediately the lead of the Public Service Commission (of July 10, 1979) and dismiss the case before any more time and money is spent on a nonviable application" (pp. 2-3).

We again request the prompt dismissal of Case Docket No. STN 50-596-597.

Respectfully submitted, M -

cog i Gr -lw d d;

\ N. Helen Daly for Ecology Action of Oswego

( Intervention Co'rdinator a sy o J +.n A p.qs o

r, g . o..q -

c . .a w

/ v g;

• i ap I167 355 7 91018 0 + 2 o A