|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20063N7471982-10-0606 October 1982 Motion for Termination of Proceedings.Util Decided to Cancel Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063N7591982-10-0606 October 1982 Withdrawal of Application for CP ML20055A7221982-07-15015 July 1982 Memorandum & Order Denying Jf Doherty 820615 Submittals, Treated as Motion to Reconsider ASLB 820602 Order.Motion Untimely Filed & Failed to Show Significance or Gravity of Issues ML20055A3551982-07-12012 July 1982 Amended Contention 59.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L4521982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Fails to Establish Timeliness &/Or Significance of Issues Sought to Be Raised.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5531982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Should Be Considered Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 820602 Order.Timeliness & Significance of Issues Not Established.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054J9371982-06-28028 June 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Request to Reopen Record. Request Improper & Insufficient to Support Relief.Commission Rules Cannot Be Circumvented by Refiling Same Argument After ASLB Ruling Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9861982-06-15015 June 1982 Motion to Reopen Record to Take Evidence on Contention 59. Gravity of Issues Warrants Reopening ML20054G0171982-06-15015 June 1982 Contention 50 Re Brown & Root Deficiencies in Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0861982-05-24024 May 1982 Response in Opposition to Util 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations.Contention Should Be Treated as Such,Not as Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20052H8621982-05-19019 May 1982 Motion to Strike J Doherty Reply to Applicant 820507 Response to Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58. Commission Rules Do Not Allow Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052H4441982-05-14014 May 1982 Reply Opposing Applicant 820507 Response to J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Contention Should Be Admitted W/Amends.Aslb Should Judge Conduct of Applicants. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F3121982-05-0707 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention Re Alleged Failure to Rept Design Defects.Substantively, Motion Is Motion to Reopen Record & Stds Have Not Been Met. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052D1221982-04-29029 April 1982 Findings of Fact on Supplemental Issues to Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4541982-04-22022 April 1982 Submittal of Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations at Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E0561982-04-21021 April 1982 Supplemental Findings of Fact on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050J1111982-04-0606 April 1982 Answers to Second & Third Sets of Interrogatories,Questions 29 & 8 Respectively,Re Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20050E2961982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Seventh Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050E2891982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Doherty Sixth Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20050C4211982-04-0202 April 1982 Objections to Request for Admissions.Requests Untimely, Irrelevant to Issues Before ASLB & Extremely & Unduly Burdensome.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4081982-03-31031 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Fifth Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4791982-03-29029 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Jf Doherty Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042C6431982-03-29029 March 1982 Motion for ASLB to Call DE Sells as Witness for Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Testimony Needed to Explain Why NRC Did Not Immediately Obtain Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6181982-03-29029 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820315 Motion for ASLB to Subpoena Quadrex Corp Employee Witnesses as ASLB Witnesses. Request Is Based on Misperception of Scope of Reopened Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5091982-03-26026 March 1982 Response to Jf Doherty 20th & 21st Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20049K0801982-03-25025 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0671982-03-25025 March 1982 Reply to Tx Pirg 820315 Addl Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5201982-03-25025 March 1982 Motion to Compel Discovery from Applicant & to Postpone Evidentiary Presentations at 820412 Hearings.Applicant Objections to Interrogatories Unsupported & Necessitate Hearings Be Delayed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0941982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Second Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0841982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Third Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5481982-03-23023 March 1982 Fourth Set of Requests for Admissions Re Quadrex Rept & Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2351982-03-17017 March 1982 Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A4791982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearings.Sufficient Grounds Not Provided to Justify Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2451982-03-15015 March 1982 Motion for Subpoena of Quadrex Corp Employees.Testimony Necessary for Clear Understanding of Brown & Root Deficiencies Despite Util Supervision & Specific Steps Needed to Correct & Prevent Problems.W/Certificate of Svc ML20042B2381982-03-15015 March 1982 Sixth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041F0761982-03-10010 March 1982 Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041F0871982-03-10010 March 1982 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearing on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Addl Time Needed to Complete Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049J6571982-03-0808 March 1982 Answers to First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1741982-03-0505 March 1982 Brief Opposing R Alexander Appeal from ASLB 820112 Order Denying Petition to Intervene.Aslb Did Not Abuse Discretion in Denying Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1201982-03-0505 March 1982 Motion for Order Directing Applicant to Provide Forthcoming Bechtel Quadrex Rept Review.Rept Pertinent to Remaining Issue.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041E1181982-03-0505 March 1982 Third Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Related Correspondence ML20041E1071982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1001982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E0711982-03-0404 March 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 21 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20049H8881982-03-0101 March 1982 Response Opposing D Marrack 820213 Motion for Review of Dates for Reopening Hearings & Continuance.No Commission Regulations or Atomic Energy Act Provisions Require Applicant Irrevocable Commitment.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5381982-02-22022 February 1982 Reply to Intervenors Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041C0671982-02-22022 February 1982 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 820209 Motion for Addl Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law.Motion Mooted by Tx Pirg Filing Proposed Findings on 820212. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5421982-02-17017 February 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1982-07-02
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009H2161981-07-30030 July 1981 Suppl Testimony of D Marrack Re Viable Fishery ML20009E3641981-07-24024 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 17 Re Tnt Detonation ML20009E8661981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of DA Hamon Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 55 (Rapid Depressurization - Steam Break).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E2941981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 8 (Reactor Bldg Subsurface Soil Mechanics) ML20009E2961981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of R Cheng Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 10 (Drywell Pressure Testing).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3531981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 29,blockage of Intake Canal ML20009E3591981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Cg Robertson Testimony Re Doherty Contention 8 & ASLB Question 3 on Atws.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3031981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of GL Sozzi on Doherty Contention 32 Re ECCS Vaporization Rate ML20009E3151981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rl Call 810720 Testimony on Doherty Contention 26 (Stud Bolts).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E4351981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Gw Oprea & Jh Goldberg Testimonies on Technical Qualifications & Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 31.Corporate Nuclear Organization Chart Encl ML20009E3481981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util on Mccorkle Contention 9 Re Chlorine Monitoring.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3451981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 40,10CFR100 Releases.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3431981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 6 & ASLB Question 12 Re Shell Oil Co 6-inch Liquid Petroleum Gas Pipeline ML20009E3171981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Jc Elliott,Tc Cheng,Md Weingart,Pa Ranzau & Cg Robertson 810720 Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group (Prig) Addl Contention 53,ASLB Questions 4B & 4A & Pirg Contentions 28 & 52.W/prof Qualifications ML20009E3211981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of SA Hucilk & Jj Boseman Testimonies on Doherty Contention 17,RL Huang Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group Addl Contention 41 & Jn Bailey Testimony on Doherty Contention 42.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3111981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of MR Lane 810720 Testimony Re Doherty Contention 41 (Reactor Water Level Indicators).Prof Qualifications Encl ML19347F5361981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DG Tees Re Doherty Contention 47,turbine Missiles.Related Correspondence ML19347F5391981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Fj Meyer Re Doherty Contention 30, Interconnection/Grid Stability.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5201981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DC Papone Re Board Question 6,ability of Applicant to Demonstrate Compliance w/10CFR50,App A.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5241981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of RA Clarke & Jf Montalbano Re Doherty Contention 10,diesel Generator Reliability.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5271981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rc Iotti & Ws Carnes Re Doherty Contention 47, Turbine Missiles.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5291981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Doherty Contention 48,control Rod Drive Return Line.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5301981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Cw Dillman Re Doherty Contention 6, Recirculation Pump Overspeed.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5311981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Mf Alesky Re Doherty Contention 50,jet Pump Beams.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5341981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of s Ranganath Re Tx Pirg Contention 39,Generic Task A-11,fracture Toughness.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5351981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rl Baron Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 21, Occupational Exposure.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5321981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Jf Montalbano & FP Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Contention 12,cable Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5371981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Board Question 8,Seismic Category 1 Control Rods.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5221981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of MD Weingart & F Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 10 & Mccorkle Contention 30,charcoal Adsorber Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5151981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of R Williams & N Horton Re Doherty Contentions 14 & 25,on Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor & Fuel Failure/ Flow Blockage,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20003G6781981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 26 Re Computer Code Error.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003G6711981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contentions 3,39 & 20(a) Re Fuel Specific Enthalpy,Fuel Swelling & Gap Conductance,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6751981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Tx Pirg Contention 6 (Mccorkle Contention XI) Re Aircraft Hazards.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6761981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 9 Re Containment Buckling.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6771981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 27 Re Reactor Pedestal.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6741981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contentions 4,5,7,9 & 10 Re Tx Electric Svc Co 24-inch Natural Gas Pipeline & Pipelines Crossing Brazos River Upstream from Facility.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6731981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 7 Re LPCI Cold Slug.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19345H1121981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony Supporting Doherty Contention 3 on Inadequacy of Design Safety Limit of Applicant Fuel Rods.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003B2381981-02-0606 February 1981 Errata Sheet for L Perl Testimony,Page 12,Line 13 & Table 9. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003A2101981-01-27027 January 1981 Errata Sheet to s Michaelson Testimony.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19343B8481980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Bishop Contention 1 Concerning Population Projections ML19340D1401980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony Re Tx Pirg Contention 1(f) Re Population Risks. Pp 1-8 ML19343B8451980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8491980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Site.Tera Corp Coastal Site Comparison Rept, Encl ML19343B8391980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 5 Concerning Solid Waste Combustion ML19343B8471980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Concerning South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek 1. Analysis of Prime Farmland Soils Encl ML19343B8461980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8441980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Re South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek Site.Listing of Cost Savings Encl 1982-03-26
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009H2161981-07-30030 July 1981 Suppl Testimony of D Marrack Re Viable Fishery ML20009E3641981-07-24024 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 17 Re Tnt Detonation ML20009E8661981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of DA Hamon Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 55 (Rapid Depressurization - Steam Break).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E2941981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 8 (Reactor Bldg Subsurface Soil Mechanics) ML20009E2961981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of R Cheng Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 10 (Drywell Pressure Testing).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3531981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 29,blockage of Intake Canal ML20009E3591981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Cg Robertson Testimony Re Doherty Contention 8 & ASLB Question 3 on Atws.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3031981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of GL Sozzi on Doherty Contention 32 Re ECCS Vaporization Rate ML20009E3151981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rl Call 810720 Testimony on Doherty Contention 26 (Stud Bolts).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E4351981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Gw Oprea & Jh Goldberg Testimonies on Technical Qualifications & Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 31.Corporate Nuclear Organization Chart Encl ML20009E3481981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util on Mccorkle Contention 9 Re Chlorine Monitoring.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3451981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 40,10CFR100 Releases.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3431981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 6 & ASLB Question 12 Re Shell Oil Co 6-inch Liquid Petroleum Gas Pipeline ML20009E3171981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Jc Elliott,Tc Cheng,Md Weingart,Pa Ranzau & Cg Robertson 810720 Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group (Prig) Addl Contention 53,ASLB Questions 4B & 4A & Pirg Contentions 28 & 52.W/prof Qualifications ML20009E3211981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of SA Hucilk & Jj Boseman Testimonies on Doherty Contention 17,RL Huang Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group Addl Contention 41 & Jn Bailey Testimony on Doherty Contention 42.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3111981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of MR Lane 810720 Testimony Re Doherty Contention 41 (Reactor Water Level Indicators).Prof Qualifications Encl ML19347F5361981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DG Tees Re Doherty Contention 47,turbine Missiles.Related Correspondence ML19347F5391981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Fj Meyer Re Doherty Contention 30, Interconnection/Grid Stability.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5201981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DC Papone Re Board Question 6,ability of Applicant to Demonstrate Compliance w/10CFR50,App A.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5241981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of RA Clarke & Jf Montalbano Re Doherty Contention 10,diesel Generator Reliability.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5271981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rc Iotti & Ws Carnes Re Doherty Contention 47, Turbine Missiles.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5291981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Doherty Contention 48,control Rod Drive Return Line.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5301981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Cw Dillman Re Doherty Contention 6, Recirculation Pump Overspeed.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5311981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Mf Alesky Re Doherty Contention 50,jet Pump Beams.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5341981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of s Ranganath Re Tx Pirg Contention 39,Generic Task A-11,fracture Toughness.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5351981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rl Baron Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 21, Occupational Exposure.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5321981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Jf Montalbano & FP Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Contention 12,cable Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5371981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Board Question 8,Seismic Category 1 Control Rods.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5221981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of MD Weingart & F Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 10 & Mccorkle Contention 30,charcoal Adsorber Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5151981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of R Williams & N Horton Re Doherty Contentions 14 & 25,on Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor & Fuel Failure/ Flow Blockage,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20003G6781981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 26 Re Computer Code Error.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003G6711981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contentions 3,39 & 20(a) Re Fuel Specific Enthalpy,Fuel Swelling & Gap Conductance,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6751981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Tx Pirg Contention 6 (Mccorkle Contention XI) Re Aircraft Hazards.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6761981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 9 Re Containment Buckling.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6771981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 27 Re Reactor Pedestal.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6741981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contentions 4,5,7,9 & 10 Re Tx Electric Svc Co 24-inch Natural Gas Pipeline & Pipelines Crossing Brazos River Upstream from Facility.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6731981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 7 Re LPCI Cold Slug.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19345H1121981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony Supporting Doherty Contention 3 on Inadequacy of Design Safety Limit of Applicant Fuel Rods.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003B2381981-02-0606 February 1981 Errata Sheet for L Perl Testimony,Page 12,Line 13 & Table 9. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003A2101981-01-27027 January 1981 Errata Sheet to s Michaelson Testimony.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19343B8481980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Bishop Contention 1 Concerning Population Projections ML19340D1401980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony Re Tx Pirg Contention 1(f) Re Population Risks. Pp 1-8 ML19343B8451980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8491980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Site.Tera Corp Coastal Site Comparison Rept, Encl ML19343B8391980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 5 Concerning Solid Waste Combustion ML19343B8471980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Concerning South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek 1. Analysis of Prime Farmland Soils Encl ML19343B8461980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8441980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Re South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek Site.Listing of Cost Savings Encl 1982-03-26
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009H2161981-07-30030 July 1981 Suppl Testimony of D Marrack Re Viable Fishery ML20009E3641981-07-24024 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 17 Re Tnt Detonation ML20009E8661981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of DA Hamon Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 55 (Rapid Depressurization - Steam Break).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E2941981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 8 (Reactor Bldg Subsurface Soil Mechanics) ML20009E2961981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of R Cheng Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 10 (Drywell Pressure Testing).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3531981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 29,blockage of Intake Canal ML20009E3591981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Cg Robertson Testimony Re Doherty Contention 8 & ASLB Question 3 on Atws.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3031981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of GL Sozzi on Doherty Contention 32 Re ECCS Vaporization Rate ML20009E3151981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rl Call 810720 Testimony on Doherty Contention 26 (Stud Bolts).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E4351981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Gw Oprea & Jh Goldberg Testimonies on Technical Qualifications & Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 31.Corporate Nuclear Organization Chart Encl ML20009E3481981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util on Mccorkle Contention 9 Re Chlorine Monitoring.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3451981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 40,10CFR100 Releases.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3431981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 6 & ASLB Question 12 Re Shell Oil Co 6-inch Liquid Petroleum Gas Pipeline ML20009E3171981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Jc Elliott,Tc Cheng,Md Weingart,Pa Ranzau & Cg Robertson 810720 Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group (Prig) Addl Contention 53,ASLB Questions 4B & 4A & Pirg Contentions 28 & 52.W/prof Qualifications ML20009E3211981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of SA Hucilk & Jj Boseman Testimonies on Doherty Contention 17,RL Huang Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group Addl Contention 41 & Jn Bailey Testimony on Doherty Contention 42.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3111981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of MR Lane 810720 Testimony Re Doherty Contention 41 (Reactor Water Level Indicators).Prof Qualifications Encl ML19347F5361981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DG Tees Re Doherty Contention 47,turbine Missiles.Related Correspondence ML19347F5391981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Fj Meyer Re Doherty Contention 30, Interconnection/Grid Stability.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5201981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DC Papone Re Board Question 6,ability of Applicant to Demonstrate Compliance w/10CFR50,App A.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5241981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of RA Clarke & Jf Montalbano Re Doherty Contention 10,diesel Generator Reliability.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5271981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rc Iotti & Ws Carnes Re Doherty Contention 47, Turbine Missiles.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5291981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Doherty Contention 48,control Rod Drive Return Line.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5301981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Cw Dillman Re Doherty Contention 6, Recirculation Pump Overspeed.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5311981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Mf Alesky Re Doherty Contention 50,jet Pump Beams.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5341981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of s Ranganath Re Tx Pirg Contention 39,Generic Task A-11,fracture Toughness.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5351981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rl Baron Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 21, Occupational Exposure.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5321981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Jf Montalbano & FP Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Contention 12,cable Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5371981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Board Question 8,Seismic Category 1 Control Rods.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5221981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of MD Weingart & F Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 10 & Mccorkle Contention 30,charcoal Adsorber Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5151981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of R Williams & N Horton Re Doherty Contentions 14 & 25,on Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor & Fuel Failure/ Flow Blockage,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20003G6781981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 26 Re Computer Code Error.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003G6711981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contentions 3,39 & 20(a) Re Fuel Specific Enthalpy,Fuel Swelling & Gap Conductance,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6751981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Tx Pirg Contention 6 (Mccorkle Contention XI) Re Aircraft Hazards.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6761981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 9 Re Containment Buckling.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6771981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 27 Re Reactor Pedestal.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6741981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contentions 4,5,7,9 & 10 Re Tx Electric Svc Co 24-inch Natural Gas Pipeline & Pipelines Crossing Brazos River Upstream from Facility.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6731981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 7 Re LPCI Cold Slug.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19345H1121981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony Supporting Doherty Contention 3 on Inadequacy of Design Safety Limit of Applicant Fuel Rods.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003B2381981-02-0606 February 1981 Errata Sheet for L Perl Testimony,Page 12,Line 13 & Table 9. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003A2101981-01-27027 January 1981 Errata Sheet to s Michaelson Testimony.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19343B8481980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Bishop Contention 1 Concerning Population Projections ML19340D1401980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony Re Tx Pirg Contention 1(f) Re Population Risks. Pp 1-8 ML19343B8451980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8491980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Site.Tera Corp Coastal Site Comparison Rept, Encl ML19343B8391980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 5 Concerning Solid Waste Combustion ML19343B8471980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Concerning South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek 1. Analysis of Prime Farmland Soils Encl ML19343B8461980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8441980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Re South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek Site.Listing of Cost Savings Encl 1982-03-26
[Table view] |
Text
.
I WTED ff)RRESPONDENCB5-11-81 93 Qg
'/ tw.=
UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA MC 3
'
- 1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION $- MAY 13195)j ,, 7
--
2' BEFORF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD C d g ofnce of the sm 3 T2Ve7/ a s.r. ,
\
In the Matter of ) @
4 )
)
W Docket No. 50-466 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY Si )
(Allens Creek Nuclear Generating )
6 Station, Unit No. 1) )
, .
. _ . _ _
)
7 O DIRECT TESTIMONY OF J. F. MONTALBANO AND F. P. BARBIERI ON BEHALF OF HOUSTON LIGHTING & POb",R COMPANY 9 ON TEXPIRG CONTENTION 12/ CABLE FIRES 10' O. Mr. Montalbano, please state your name and job position.
11 A. My name is Joseph Montalbano and I am a Supervising 12 Electrical Engineer for Ebasco Services, Inc.
13 0. Please state your educational backginund, work experience 14 and professional qualifications.
15 A. The statement of my background and qualifications is 16 attached as Exhibit JFM-1 to this testimony.
l 17 o. Mr. Barbieri, please state your name and job position.
18 A. My name is Fred Barbieri and I am the Lead Fire Pro-19 tectiun Engineer-ACNGS for Ebasco Services, Inc.
20 o. Please state your educational background, work experience 21 and professional qualifications.
22 A. The statement of my background and qualifications is 23 attached as Exhibit FPB-1 to this testimony.
24 9 Mr. Montalbano, what is the purpose of this testimony?
25 A. The purpose of this testimony is to address TexPirg 26 Contention 12 which alleges that:
27 Electrical wiring for the ACNGS is susceptible to fast flaming, and potential resulting common mode E failures, in the event of an intense flash fire.
8105190 % 7
.
. 1 2 A fire protection research test conducted by the Underwritete Laboratory for the Commission, which 3 the Staff forwarded on October 30, 1978 to the Board and to those on the service list, indicated that 4 modifications to certain of the Staff's fire pro-tection criteria may be necessary.
6 0 What is your interpretation of this contention?
7, A. Intervenor contends that the electrical wiring for 8 ACNGS is susceptible to fast flaming and therefore has the 9 potential to result in the failures of redundant safety-10 related (Class lE) cables in the event of an intense flash 11 fire. In general, Intervenor appears to allege that the 12 present fire protection criteria for cable and electrical 13 wiring to be used at ACNGS is inadequate.
14 Q. What is the fire protection criteria under NRC regula-15 tions used for the safety-related electrical cable at 16 ACNGS?
17 A. Criterion 3 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, 18 in pertinent part, that:
19 Structures, systems and components ir.portant to safety shall be designed and located to minimize, 20 consistent with other safety requirements, the probability and effect of fires and explosions.
21 Noncombustible and heat resistant material shall be used wherever practical throughout the unit, 22 particularly in locations such as the containnent and control room. Fire detection and fighting 23 systems of appropriate capacity and capability shall be provided and designed to minimize the 24 adverse affects of fires on structures, systems, and components important to safety . . .
'
2,0 26 ACNGS structures, systems and components important to 27 safety are identified in PSAR (Section 3.2) and include 28 electrical cable designated as Class lE, as defined in
!
.
. 1 2' IEEE Standards 380-1975, " Definition of Terms Used in IEEE 3 Standards on Nuclear Power Generating Staticus."
4 Q. Does the ACNGS design satisfy the criteria set forth in 5 Criterion 3?
A. In order to satisfy Criterion 3, ACNGS design utilizes 6l the " defense-i n-depth" approach recommended by Regulatory 7~
8 Guide 1.120 " Fire Protection Guidelines for Nuclear Fower 9' Plants." Defense-in-depth attempts to minimize both the 10 prcbability and the consequence of postulated fires by 11 utilizing all of tha following three elements:
12 1. prevent fi res from starting; 13 2. detect fires quickly, suppress those fires which 14 occur, extinguish fires quickly thereby limiting 15 their damage; and 16 3. design plant safety systems so that should a 17 fire stsrt in spite of the fire protection 18 program and burn for a considerable time in 19 spite of fire protection activities, the fire 20 will not prevent essential plant safety functions 21 from being performed.
22 None of the above three elements is complete or adequate 23 in and of itself. The secret of defense-in-depth is to 14 achieve an adequate balance of the three basic elements.
25 Q. How does the ACNGS design with respect to electrical 26 caoles address the first clement of Regulatory Guide 1.120, 27 that is, preventing a fire from starting?
28 A. ACNGS his selected cables which have proven fire
.
i l l
'
s l l
l 1
-
1 _4_ ;
1 2 retardant properties. ;
3- O. How are you assured that these procerties are flame 4 retardant?
5 A, Flan.e retardant properties of Class lE cables can be 6 adequataly demonstrated by type testing in accordance with 7l] IEEE Standard 1
383-1974, "IEEE Standard for Type Test of
'
81 Class lE Electric Cables, Field Splices, and Connections for N
9 Nuclear Pcwer Generating Stations." Cables which pass this 104 test have been accepted as meeting NRC Branch Technical 11 Position APCSB 9.5-1, Appendix A dated May 1976 and Regulatory 12 Guide 1.120. All ACNGS Class lE cables will satisfy the 13 criteria of IEEE 383-1974.
14 IEEE 383-1974 includes procedures for a flame test of 15 representative samples of both aged and unaged samples of 16 the cable category being qualified including the cable 17 insulation. This test was developed to demonstrate that 18 qualified cables installed in the vertical tray configura-19 tion specified in the test will not cause fire propagation 20 after the flame source has been removed. (This arrangement 21 represents the worst case condition from a flame propagation 22 point of view). A successful IEEE 383-1974 type test 23 provides adequate assurance that the insulation and jacketing 24 material of cables installed in a tray will not support the 25 spread of flame within that tray.
26 o. would you describe how the fire protection properties 27 of electrical cables are vecifie??
28 A. The Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research has initiated f .
- - ._ ..
.
1 .
2 a series of generic tests to determine the effectiveness 3 of fire protection features used in nuclear power plant 4 designs. The test program in part examined:
5 (a) the c'fects of fires on various cable insulations, 6 (b) the effects of physical separation.
7 since fire protection features vary considerably from 8 plant to plant, the fire protection research program was 9 designed to provide msic data to assist the staff in 10 the review of the proposed fire protection features for 11 each plant design.
12 several of these tests have provided data for evaluation 13 of the IEEE 383-1974 flame test and its adequacy as a 14 benchmark for the design objective of minimizing the spread 15 of a fire within a cable tray. For example, in an experiment 16 conducted at sandia Laboratories, cable of a construction 17 that had passed the IEEE 383-1974 flame test was installed 18 in a horizontal run of cable tray, and ignited using the 19 IEEE 383-lC74 flame-test burners. From the reported test 20 results, it was apparent tnat the flame did not spread 21 significantly beyond the area of burner flame impingement.
22 Q. Have tests been conducted on cables using different 23 insulation and jacket materiels?
24 A. Yes. In a series of 20 experiments conducted by 25 Underwriters Laboratories (NUREG/CR-0346), cables with three 26 dist[nct insulation and jacket materials were installed in a 27 vertical cable tray and subjected to a burner flame similar 28 to that of IEEE 383-1974. The three cable types tested were
.
. 1 2 A. PVC insulation with a nylon jacket 3 B. EPR insulation with a hypalon jacket di C. XLPE insulation with a neoprene jacket I
5 The tests results clearly established that Type B and Type 6, C cables demonstrated superior performance and in general I
7 support the adequacy of the cables to meet the requirements 8 of the IEEE 383 standard.
9 Q. What cable materials will be used at ACNGS?
10 A. The low voltage and power cables will use EPR insulation 11 with a hypalon jacket while the control cables will use XLPE 12 insulation with a hypalon jacket. Both of these compounds 13 are thermosetting materials. The flame resistant XLPE 14 insulation and the Hypalon jacket have an oxygen index (OI) 15 of about 3. (To be self extinguisti.ng, materials should
,
16 have an OI of about 25 or higher. PVC has an OI of 21 to 17 22.) The Type I EPR used on Allens Creek has an OI of 27 18 and the cable constructicn utilizes Hypalon jacket over the l 19 individual conductors and a Hypalon jacket over all.
1
'
20 Therefo.e, both cable types have self extinguishing character-21 istics and as demonstrated in the above test, pass the 22 vertical tray flame test of IEEE 383-1974. These results 23 establish that the cables to be used at ACNGS are not sub-N ject to fast flaming.
25 Q. In his contention, Mr. Doherty refers to a fire pro-20 tection research test conducted by Underwriters Laboratory U which was transmitted to the Licensing Board on October 30, 1978. What is the relevance of this test to ACNGS?
.
1 _7_
2 A. In a test conducted by UL (Interim Report UL-USNC83OL-1 3 dated October 6, 1978), the effects of fire on a vertical 4 tray arrangement with cables protected by a mineral wool 5 fire barrier and fixed automatic fire detection and sup-6' pression system was conducted. The use of mineral wool 7 blankets is not being proposed for use on ACNGS and therefore 8 the test has no relevance to the ACNGS design.
9 Q. Mr. Barbieri, turning to the second element in Regula-10" tory Guide 1.120, please describe the fire protection systems 11 for the safety related electrical cable at ACNGS.
12!;A. The fire protection systems for ACNGS are described in 13 A'ppendix 9.5-1A "Conformance to Regulatory Fire Protection
- 14 Guidelines" of the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. A 15 fixed automatic PREACTION sprinkler system will. be installed 16 with manual hose backup in accordance with the guxdelines of 17 Mgulatory Guide 1.120 and BTP 9.5-1 Appendix A, Sections 18 Dc 3 (c) and F.3. The Preaction Sprinkler System is an 19 automatic sprinkler system containing air under supervisory 20 pressure downstream from the preaction valve. This system 21 is automatically actuated by a thermal fire detection system 22 ins:alled in the same area as the sprinklers which responds 23 before fusing of the sprinkler fusible link. Actuation of 24 the fire detection system opens the preaction valve charging 25 the piping with water which will make water available to a 26 sprinkler head which is fused by the heat of the fire.
27 In addition to the thermal fire detection system used M for actuation cf the automatic PREACTION system, an early I
o 1 -B-2 warning fire detection system is provided in each fire area 3 or fire zone. This system consists of smoke detectors 4 located in all cable tray areas. Upon detection of smoke, 5- which usually precedes intense heat and flame, an larm 6 signal is sent to a Local Early Warning Fire Detection 7 Panel. This panel provides local audible and visual alarms 8' while simultaneously transmitting an audible and visual h
9" alarm to the Plant Communications Room and the Control Room.
10 In the balance of the plant, the cable tray separation 11 distances of Class lE cabling will, as a minimum, be the 12 same as those prescribed in IEEE 384 Section 5.1.4. Where i 13 cable tray configurations in a single fire area are such 14 that a single division of safety related cable exceeds 6 l
15 trays either stacked vertically or located side-by-side, 16 automatic PREACTION systems and early warning zoned fire i
17 detection systems are provided. Moreover, manual hose i 18 stations and portable fire extinguishers are provided in all 19 cable areas. Besides the normal fire protection water 20 supply system, standby water from the essential services 21 water system is provided for hose stations located within 22 reach of any safety-related cable required fo safe shutdown l 23 of the plant. All divisions of safety-related cable trays l
l 24 are installed either in separate fire areas or if installed l 25 in the same fire area, they are separated spatially such 26 that the effects of fire on 2 safety divisions simultaneously 1
27 are minimized. A fire area is that portion of a building
( 28 that is separated from other areas by boundary fire barriers
!
- _d
, 1 2 (walls, floors or roofs) with any openings or penetrations 8 protected with seals (fire stops) or closures having a fire 4 resistance rating equal to .at of the barrier. Where 5 redundant safety divisions of cable tray in the same fire 6 area are less than 20 feet apart, an automatic PREACTION 7 sprinkler system is provided.
8 In addition to the above, fire breaks are provided in 9- vertical and horizontLi cable trays carrying Class lE cable 10 to limit the spread of a fire. The barriers are located at 11 15 foot intervals on all vertical cable tray runs and at 20 12 foot int,rvals on all horizontal cable tray rune. A fire 13 barrier prevents fire propagation along the length of cables 14 or prevents spreading of fire to nearby combustibles within 15 a given fire area or fire zone. Cable and cable tray 16 penetrations of fire barriers, both vertical and horizontal, 17 are sealed to give protection equivalent to that of the 18 penetrated barrier. For example, a cable tray passing 19 through a 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> rated fire barrier is sealed at the barrier 20 with a fire stop assembly which has been tested as providing 21 a resistance to burnthrough for 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />.
22 Q. Mr. Montablano, will you discuss how the ACNGS design 23 will meet the third element of Regulatory Guide 1.120?
24 A. The third element of Regulatory Guide 1.120 relates 25 primarily to separation of redundant safety-related cable.
26 Several experiments in the NRC's test program have 27 provided data for evaluation of the tray separation distance 28 criteria of IEEE 384-1974 as a method of minimizing the l
.
- 1 2 effects of an electrically initiated fire in one cable tray 3 on adjacent cable trays. These experiments were conducted 4 on cable tray installations that met the requirements of 5 IEEE Standard 384-1974 for cable and cable tray construction, 6 cable installation, and hazard limits. The cable tray 7 separation distances used in these experiments were less 8 than the IEEE Standard 384-1974 design criteria for minimum 9 separation distances between cable trays in the cable vault.
10 Seven separate full-scale experiments were conducted, and 11 the experiments are described in detail in Sandia Laboratories 12 reports. In all of these experiments, electrical ignition 13 of a cable fire was accomplished in an " ignition" tray, and 14 data was gatherec .,n the effect of such a fire on cable in 15 trays below, above, and to the side of the ignition trays.
16 As stated on page 32 of the Summary and Conclusions of 17 " Cable Tray Fire Tests." Sand 77-ll25C, July 1977:
18 At no time did the cables in trays displaced from the ignition tray begin to burn. All circuits in 19 these trays remained functional and elongation measurements taken of the insulation closest to the 20 fire showed no major (10%) change.
21 These expermients provide assurance that cable vault cable 22 tray installations designed in accordance with IEEE Standard 23 384-1974 will not suffer fire effe"ts from electrically 24 initiated fires in excess of that allowed by criterion 3.
25 An additional related experiment was conducted at 26 Sandia Laboratories in July 1977 (Sand 77-1424) and provided 27 further data useful in anclyzing cable tray installations 28 that use an exposure fire as a design basis. This test used ,
!
l I
--
I
.
-
1 2 the stacked cable trays and cable tray separation criteria 3 of IEEE 383-1974, with an exposure fire initiating source 4 (two burners) rather than electrical heating source.
5 An important re<: ult of this fire test is that the 6 lowest 3 cable trays separated horizontally from the exposed 7 cable tray by 8 inches were not affected by the fire and the 8; cable in those trays remained functional. In addition, the 9 l cable tray simulating the redundant division, and located 3 10 ! feet horizontally from the top of the 14 trays simulating 11 the other division, was not damaged and the cable in that 12 tray remained functional. This result provides convincing 13 evidence that the horizontal separation distance of IEEE 14 384-1974 is adequate for the cable vault even if an exposure 15 fire is used as a design basis and therefore the potential 16 of common mode failure has been averted.
17 Q. Please describe the cable tray separation and fire 18 protection system design criteria used at ACNGS.
19 A. Criteria for the design of seismic category I cable 20 tray installations used at ACNGS are given in IEEE Standard 21 384-1974, "IEEE Trial-Use Standard Criteria for Separation 22 of Class IE Equipment and Circuits" and are endorsed by the 28 NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.75, " Physical Independence of 24 Electric Systems." Section 5.1.3 of IEEE Standard 384 25 states criteria for the separation of the cable trays in the 26 cable vault. That Section provides in part that:
27 The minimum separation distance between redundant Cless lE cable trays shall be . . . 1 foot between 28 trays separated horizontally and 3 feet between trays separated vertically.
.
. 1 2 Section 5.1.1.3 of IEEE Standard 384-1974 also stipulates 3 specific requirements as to cable and cable tray construction, 4 cable installation, and hazard limits justifying the 1 foot 5 horizontal and 3 foot vertical separation distances as 6 conservative criteria for the design of the cable tray 7 installations in the cable vault. The ACNGS cable vault 8 will meet or exceed this separation criteria.
9 The cable vault at ACNGS is located at Elevation 10' 164', 0" in the Control Building. The ACNGS cable vault 11 contains class lE cable and seismic category I cable trays 12 for all four safety divisions. Within this area, cables 13 associated with Safety Divisions 1 & 4 are separated from 14 cables associated with redundant Safety Divisions 2 & 3 by a 15 three hour fire barrier wall consisting of reinforced 16 concrete. Since this design of the cable tray installation 17 is significantly more conservative than that required by 18 IEEE 384, the requirements of Criterion 3 are thereby 19 satisfied when considering the physical anc apatf.el separation 20 between redundant cable divisiens.
21 Q. What are your conclusions concerning this contention?
22 A. The present fire protection criteria for electric cable 23 wiring to be used at ACNGS is adequate, and NRC requirements 24 concerning electrical cable wiring design have been incorporated 25 into the design at ACNGS. The fire protection plans for 26 ACNGS provide additional assurance that the design of the 27 electrical cable wiring systems will not create a safety 28 hazard.
- - - . - _- - . .-. ._ _ __
.
- 1 Exhibit FPB-1 2 EDUCATION AND PF0FESSIONAL QUAI.IFICATIONS 3 Fred P. Barbieri 4
SUMMARY
OF 3XPERIENCE 5 Professional Affiliations - Member - Society of Fire b' Protection Engineers 7 Member - National Fire Pro-O tection Association 0 Education - Manhattan College, Bachelor of 10 Engineering (Chemical)-1973 11 EBASCO EXPERIENCE (Since 1973) 12 Ebasco Services Incorporated, Lyndhurst Office: Senior
- 10. Mechanical Nuclear Engineer assigned to the Allens Creek 14 Nuclear Project. Responsible for the preparation an:1 maintenance of the Plant Fire Hazards Analysis Report to I be submitted as part of the FSAR to the NRC. Responsible for generating Fire Protection Design Criteria for ACN:!S Unit 18 No. 1 and preparation of the Fire Protection System Description.
I0 Respont,1ble for all fire protection baseline engineering 20 (flow diagrams, specifications, calculations, piping layouts).
I Responsible for review of all other baseline engineering 22 associated with fire protection measures to insure consistency 23 with fire protection criteria. Also responsible for the 24 design and layout of the Early W$ ring Fire Detection Systems.
PRIOR EXPERIENCE 26 Burns and Roe, Inc., Paramus, New Jersey, Building 27 Services Department for three (3) years: Cognizant Engineer 28 on Forked River Nuclear Station, Lacey Township, New Jersey
.
,
1 2 for Jersey Central Power & Light Company. Responsible for the 3 design of the fire protection systems including yard system 4 and internal fire suppression systems. This included pre-
- 5. paration of system calculations, system flow diagrams, system design descriptions, valve lists, piping line lists, equipment 6l 7 lists, equipment and construction specifications and bid 8' evaluations of said specifications. Responsible for coordinating 9 project effort to produce plant fire hazards analysis, and 10 preparation of final fire hazards analysis report to be sub-11 mitted to NRC. Responsible for design and layout of early 12 warning fire detection systems. Responsible for layout
. 3 (General Arrangement Drawing) of Fire Protection Pumphouse as 14 well as coordinating design effort to produce fire protection 15 system piping layouts. Responsible for submitting all fire 16 protection related baseline documents, specifications and 17 physical layouts to NELPIA for approvsl.
18 Also responsible for the baseline engineering design of 19 heating and ventilating systems for the Fire Protection Pump 20 House, Circulating Water Pump House and Turbine Buildings.
21 This included system calculations, system flow diagrams and 22 system design descriptions.
23 Cognizant Engineer on Three Mile 131and Nuclear Station, N Unit II, RoyMton Township, Pennsyl rnia for Jersey Central 25 Power & Light Company. Responsible for the design of the 26 fire protection and detection systems. This included pre-27 paration of system flow diagrams, system design descriptions, 28 valve instrument list and specifications. Responsible for
I
.
1 2 coordinating contractor construction effort for installation 3 of fire protection and detection systems, review and approval 4 of vendor drawings and calculations.
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
- 18
'
19 l
20 l 21 l
N 23 24 25 26 27 28 l
l
. 1 EXHIBIT JFM-1
, EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 2'
JOSEPH F. MONTALBANO 8li 4I EXPERIENCE
SUMMARY
5 Registered Professional Engineer with nine years of 6 experience in electrical design engineering of fossil and 7l nuclear-fueled electric generating stations. Responsibilities 8 included developing the electricsl system and basic design 9 criteria for each project, application of computer analyses 10 for an optimum electrical auxiliary system, development of 11 electrical main and auxiliary one-line diagrams, input 12 criteria for physical design drawings for the station, 13 economic analysis of equipment options, preparation of 14 equipment specifications, purchase requisitions, bid evaluations 15 and recommendations for purchase, surveillance of equipment 16 orders for compliance with specification and required-at-site 17 dates, and engineering support to field forces.
18 Ad:ainistrative responsibilities have included project 19 implementation of QA Programs, development of CPM logic and 20 manpower forecasts and resources and exercising job control 21 by monitoring schedule and workday and Earned Value reports.
22 Responsibic for distribution system des;gn for 5 kV 23 and 13 kV underground networks including conductor selection, 24 cable and transfcrmer selection and location and impedance 25 calculations.
26 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 27 Ebasco Se2 vices Incorporated, New York, New York; I
28 1972 - Present
I
I
'
.
1- '
- Supervising Engineer, 1981-Present 2l 3
- Principal Engineer, 1980-1981 4,
- Senior Engineer, 1977-1980 5l,
- Associate Engineer, 1974-1975 l
7
- Assistant Engineer, 1972-1974 8i EDUCATION 9
I
- Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn-BSEE-1972 10'
- Polytechnic Institute of New York-MSEE-1977 11
- New York Institute of Technology-MBA-1981 12 13 REGISTRATIONS 14 Professional Engineer in the States of New York 15 and New Jersey.
16 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS 17 IEEE-Member 18
! 19 20 21 l
22 23 24 25 26 27 28