|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20063N7591982-10-0606 October 1982 Withdrawal of Application for CP ML20063N7471982-10-0606 October 1982 Motion for Termination of Proceedings.Util Decided to Cancel Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055A7221982-07-15015 July 1982 Memorandum & Order Denying Jf Doherty 820615 Submittals, Treated as Motion to Reconsider ASLB 820602 Order.Motion Untimely Filed & Failed to Show Significance or Gravity of Issues ML20055A3551982-07-12012 July 1982 Amended Contention 59.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5531982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Should Be Considered Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 820602 Order.Timeliness & Significance of Issues Not Established.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054L4521982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Fails to Establish Timeliness &/Or Significance of Issues Sought to Be Raised.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J9371982-06-28028 June 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Request to Reopen Record. Request Improper & Insufficient to Support Relief.Commission Rules Cannot Be Circumvented by Refiling Same Argument After ASLB Ruling Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9861982-06-15015 June 1982 Motion to Reopen Record to Take Evidence on Contention 59. Gravity of Issues Warrants Reopening ML20054G0171982-06-15015 June 1982 Contention 50 Re Brown & Root Deficiencies in Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D6371982-06-0202 June 1982 Memorandum & Order Denying J Doherty 820422 Motion Re Contention 58 on Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations. Applicant 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty 820514 Reply Granted ML20053A3961982-05-24024 May 1982 Order Extending Commission Time to Review ALAB-671 Until 820601 ML20053D0861982-05-24024 May 1982 Response in Opposition to Util 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations.Contention Should Be Treated as Such,Not as Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20052H8621982-05-19019 May 1982 Motion to Strike J Doherty Reply to Applicant 820507 Response to Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58. Commission Rules Do Not Allow Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052H4441982-05-14014 May 1982 Reply Opposing Applicant 820507 Response to J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Contention Should Be Admitted W/Amends.Aslb Should Judge Conduct of Applicants. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F9941982-05-12012 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Intervenor Fails to Meet Required Stds to Reopen Record & for Untimely Filings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F2971982-05-10010 May 1982 Order Extending Time Until 820524 for Commission to Determine Whether to Review ALAB-671 ML20052F3121982-05-0707 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention Re Alleged Failure to Rept Design Defects.Substantively, Motion Is Motion to Reopen Record & Stds Have Not Been Met. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052D1221982-04-29029 April 1982 Findings of Fact on Supplemental Issues to Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4541982-04-22022 April 1982 Submittal of Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations at Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E0561982-04-21021 April 1982 Supplemental Findings of Fact on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054D5251982-04-20020 April 1982 Order Incorporating ASLB Rulings at 820412 Hearing Re Tx Pirg 820405 Motion to Enter Counsel for cross-examination & to Reconsider 820128 Order.Motion Denied But Tx Pirg Permitted to Submit Written cross-examination Questions ML20054B6981982-04-14014 April 1982 Transcript of 820414 Hearing.Pp 21,787-22,027 ML20050E2181982-04-0808 April 1982 Order Ruling on Doherty Motions.Request for Production of Bechtel Quadrex Rept Review Moot Since Applicant Furnished Rept on 820316.Motion of 820315 for Subpoena of Quadrex Corp Employees Denied W/O Prejudice ML20050J1111982-04-0606 April 1982 Answers to Second & Third Sets of Interrogatories,Questions 29 & 8 Respectively,Re Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20050E2891982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Doherty Sixth Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20050E2961982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Seventh Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4211982-04-0202 April 1982 Objections to Request for Admissions.Requests Untimely, Irrelevant to Issues Before ASLB & Extremely & Unduly Burdensome.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050B1141982-03-31031 March 1982 Decision ALAB-671,affirming ASLB Decision Denying R Alexander Petition to Intervene.Aslb Assessment of Untimeliness of Petition Free of Matl Error.Issue Raised No Longer Cognizable ML20050C4081982-03-31031 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Fifth Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042C5661982-03-30030 March 1982 Reply Opposing Tx PIRG,810315 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Proposed Findings Are Collection of Disjointed Thoughts & Facts W/No Rational Assessment of Effect on Problem or Issue Discussed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20042C6431982-03-29029 March 1982 Motion for ASLB to Call DE Sells as Witness for Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Testimony Needed to Explain Why NRC Did Not Immediately Obtain Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6181982-03-29029 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820315 Motion for ASLB to Subpoena Quadrex Corp Employee Witnesses as ASLB Witnesses. Request Is Based on Misperception of Scope of Reopened Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C4791982-03-29029 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Jf Doherty Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20050C5091982-03-26026 March 1982 Response to Jf Doherty 20th & 21st Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0801982-03-25025 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0671982-03-25025 March 1982 Reply to Tx Pirg 820315 Addl Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5201982-03-25025 March 1982 Motion to Compel Discovery from Applicant & to Postpone Evidentiary Presentations at 820412 Hearings.Applicant Objections to Interrogatories Unsupported & Necessitate Hearings Be Delayed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049J9651982-03-24024 March 1982 Testimony of Fr Allenspach & JW Gilray Per ASLB 810128 Order Re Doherty Renewed Motion for Addl Evidence on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31.Quadrex Rept Does Not Alter Previous Conclusions That Applicant Technically Qualified ML20049J9701982-03-24024 March 1982 Answers to First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049J9671982-03-24024 March 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 ML20049K0841982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Third Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0941982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Second Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5481982-03-23023 March 1982 Fourth Set of Requests for Admissions Re Quadrex Rept & Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A2721982-03-18018 March 1982 Order Scheduling 820412-16 Evidentiary Hearing to Receive Addl Evidence in Houston,Tx ML20042A2771982-03-18018 March 1982 Memorandum & Order Denying J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearing on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Ample Time to Complete Discovery Given.Personal Obligations Are No Excuse ML20042B2351982-03-17017 March 1982 Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A4791982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearings.Sufficient Grounds Not Provided to Justify Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041G1711982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion to Postpone 820412 Hearing on Quadrex Rept.Doherty Cannot Profit from Failure to Comply W/Aslb Order Re Completion of Discovery by Postponing Hearing.Certificate of Svc Encl 1982-07-02
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20054B6981982-04-14014 April 1982 Transcript of 820414 Hearing.Pp 21,787-22,027 ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20049J9651982-03-24024 March 1982 Testimony of Fr Allenspach & JW Gilray Per ASLB 810128 Order Re Doherty Renewed Motion for Addl Evidence on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31.Quadrex Rept Does Not Alter Previous Conclusions That Applicant Technically Qualified ML20038D0461981-12-0909 December 1981 Transcript of 811209 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx. Pp 21,103-21,328 ML20038D0451981-12-0808 December 1981 Transcript of 811208 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,939- 21,102 ML20038D0441981-12-0707 December 1981 Trancript of 811207 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,774- 20,938 ML20033A3281981-11-20020 November 1981 Transcript of 811120 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,650- 20,773.Related Documentation Encl ML20033A3471981-11-18018 November 1981 Transcript of 811118 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,276- 20,407 ML20033A3571981-11-17017 November 1981 Transcript of 811117 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 200,070- 20,145 & 20,152-20,275.Related Documentation Encl ML20033A3391981-11-16016 November 1981 Transcript of 811116 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 19,863- 20,069.Affidavits & Related Documentation Encl ML20032B2081981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Wl Brooks Re Doherty Contention 15 That Industry Std Power Excursion Theory Inadequate to Represent Increase in Heat Energy Due to Rapid Increase in Reactivity in Design Based Power Excursion Accident ML20032B2131981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Wl Brooks Re Doherty Contention 24.Basis Has Been Developed for Conclusions That Potential Worth of Postulated Dropped Rod Sufficiently Small to Prevent Peak Energy Yield of 280 Cal./Gm ML20032B2021981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Vth Leung Re Doherty Contention 11 on Fuel Pool Integrity Consequences When Spent Fuel Assembly Dropped on Pool Floor.Dropped Assembly Would Not Penetrate Steel Liner. Concrete Floor Below Steel Liner Would Not Be Damaged ML20032B2101981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Wl Brooks Re Doherty Contention 21 on Core Power Density & Adequacy of Odyn Code to Demonstrate Reactor Scram Curve.Applicant Will Not Be Required to Perform Analyses W/Odyn Code at CP Stage ML20032B0111981-10-30030 October 1981 Transcript of 811030 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 19,593-19,862. Gotchy,Litton,Gunther & Malec Testimonies,Exhibits, Affidavits & Impact of U Fuel Cycle Encl ML20032B2041981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Jf Knight & Je Kennedy Re ASLB Questions on Scram Discharge Level Monitoring Sys.Transmitters Measuring Scram Discharge Vol Level Must Conform to Category I Environ Qualification Requirements ML20032A9911981-10-29029 October 1981 Transcript of 811029 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 19,331-19,592. Field,Martin,Malec & Chiou Testimony,Exhibits,Topical Repts, Errata,Prof Qualifications & Other Supportive Documentation Encl ML20032B0041981-10-28028 October 1981 Transcript of 811028 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx. Pp 19,074-19,330 ML20032A9901981-10-27027 October 1981 Transcript of 811027 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,868-19,073. Hou & Peterson Testimony,Affidavits & Prof Qualifications Encl ML20032A9881981-10-26026 October 1981 Transcript of 811026 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,606-18,867. Urbanik & Kantor Testimony & Other Supportive Documentation Encl ML20011A6301981-10-22022 October 1981 Testimony of FB Litton Re Doherty Contention 43 on Stainless Steel Cleaning & Reg Guide 1.54.Applicant Meets All Applicable NRC Licensing Requirements Re Cleaning & Coating Matls for CP ML20031E5501981-10-14014 October 1981 Table 1 & Attachment 1,inadvertently Omitted from 811009 Testimony Re Increased Risk of Cancer & Noncancerous Effects from App I Levels of Radiation ML20031E5511981-10-14014 October 1981 Testimony of T Urbanik Re Evacuation Time Estimate Study. Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6951981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Rl Gotchy Re Potential Public Health Impact of Rn-222 Releases Resulting from U Mining & Milling.Average Annual Dose Increase Insignificant ML20031D7111981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Rl Grubb Re Core Lateral Support (Doherty Contention 45).Reactor Core Will Withstand Combined Seismic/Loca Loadings.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6631981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of F Kantor Re Emergency Planning Issue (Schuessler Consolidated Contention 1).Applicant Info Meets App E,Part Ii,Item H Requirements.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6841981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Hou Re Control Rod Ejection (Doherty Contention 28).Facility Protective Measures Ensure Public Safety for Postulated Rod Ejection Accident.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6741981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Mb Fields Re Bypass Leakage (Mccorkle Contention 17) ML20031D6831981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Hou Re Flow Induced Vibration (Tx Pirg Contention 11 & Doherty Contention 31).Applicant Info Adequate for CP Application.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D7161981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of FB Litton Re Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking/Water Hammer (Doherty Contention 44).Applicant Program Complies W/Nrc Recommendations to Minimize Occurrences ML20031D6701981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Rl Gotchy Re Increased Risk of Cancer & Noncancerous Effects from App I Levels of Radiation (Cummings Contention 9).Health Effects Models Underestimated Health Risks ML20031D6781981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Mb Fields Re Suppression Pool Swell (Doherty Contention 5) ML20031D7171981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of FB Litton Re Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking (Tx Pirg Contention 10) ML20031D8561981-10-0909 October 1981 Transcript of 811009 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx. Pp 18,450-18,605.LA Gunther & RA Frazar Testimony Re Doherty Contention 35 (Welding) & Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6711981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Mb Fields Re Mannings Coefficient (Tx Pirg Contention 6) ML20031D8401981-10-0808 October 1981 Transcript of 811008 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,218-18,449. F Allenspach & J Gilray Testimony & Organization & Staffing to Oversee Design & Const Encl ML20031D8541981-10-0707 October 1981 Transcript of 811007 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,014- 18,217.GW Oprea & Jh Goldberg Testimony Encl ML20031D8381981-10-0606 October 1981 Transcript of 811006 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 17,800-18,013. Testimony of M Mitchell,M Hodges,T Huang,C Ferrell & L Soffer Encl ML20031D8531981-10-0505 October 1981 Transcript of 811005 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 17,574- 17,799 ML20031A3791981-09-18018 September 1981 Transcript of 810918 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 17,391- 17,573.Prof Qualifications of El Murri,Wr Griffin & RW Lawhn Encl ML20031H4671981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Mk Mitchell Re Doherty Contention 38(b) on Cold Shutdown within 24 Hours.No NRC Requirements Specify Facility Be Designed to Be Capable of Being Brought to Cold Shutdown in 24 Hours ML20031H4831981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of La Gunther & RA Frazer Re Doherty Contention 35 on Welding.Describes Planned Welding Program.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031H4821981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Ma Lugo Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 6 on Mannings Coefficient & ASLB Question on Svc Level Stress Limits.Margin of Safety Above Design Pressure at 15 Psig Is 35 Psig.Prof Qualifications ML20031H3641981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of La Gunther & Wf Malec Re Tx Pirg Contention 10, Doherty Contentions 44 & 43 & ASLB Question on Reg Guide 1.54 ML20031H4581981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of RR Hobson & Jg Dunlap Re Doherty Contention 45 on Core Lateral Support.Facility Fuel Assemblies Comply W/Recommendations in NUREG/CR-1018.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031H4791981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of DA Nuto Re Doherty Contention 5 Re Supression Pool Uplift.Suppression Pool Swell Effects During LOCA Will Not Cause Structural Damage to Steel Platform Supporting Hydraulic Control Units.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031H3791981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of G Martin & Wf Malec Re Mccorkle Contention 17 on Bypass Leakage.Aslb Statement Correct That No Difference Exists in % by Weight & % by Vol ML20031H4731981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Gm Gordon Re Tx Pirg Contention 10,Doherty Contentions 10,43 & 44 ML20031H3461981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Sp Congdon Re Doherty Contention 15 on Wigle Computer Code.No Basis for Contention.Criteria Contained in Spert Rept Irrelevant to Scram Reactivity Calculations 1982-04-14
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20054B6981982-04-14014 April 1982 Transcript of 820414 Hearing.Pp 21,787-22,027 ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20049J9651982-03-24024 March 1982 Testimony of Fr Allenspach & JW Gilray Per ASLB 810128 Order Re Doherty Renewed Motion for Addl Evidence on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31.Quadrex Rept Does Not Alter Previous Conclusions That Applicant Technically Qualified ML20038D0461981-12-0909 December 1981 Transcript of 811209 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx. Pp 21,103-21,328 ML20038D0451981-12-0808 December 1981 Transcript of 811208 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,939- 21,102 ML20038D0441981-12-0707 December 1981 Trancript of 811207 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,774- 20,938 ML20033A3281981-11-20020 November 1981 Transcript of 811120 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,650- 20,773.Related Documentation Encl ML20033A3471981-11-18018 November 1981 Transcript of 811118 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,276- 20,407 ML20033A3571981-11-17017 November 1981 Transcript of 811117 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 200,070- 20,145 & 20,152-20,275.Related Documentation Encl ML20033A3391981-11-16016 November 1981 Transcript of 811116 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 19,863- 20,069.Affidavits & Related Documentation Encl ML20032B2081981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Wl Brooks Re Doherty Contention 15 That Industry Std Power Excursion Theory Inadequate to Represent Increase in Heat Energy Due to Rapid Increase in Reactivity in Design Based Power Excursion Accident ML20032B2131981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Wl Brooks Re Doherty Contention 24.Basis Has Been Developed for Conclusions That Potential Worth of Postulated Dropped Rod Sufficiently Small to Prevent Peak Energy Yield of 280 Cal./Gm ML20032B2021981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Vth Leung Re Doherty Contention 11 on Fuel Pool Integrity Consequences When Spent Fuel Assembly Dropped on Pool Floor.Dropped Assembly Would Not Penetrate Steel Liner. Concrete Floor Below Steel Liner Would Not Be Damaged ML20032B2101981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Wl Brooks Re Doherty Contention 21 on Core Power Density & Adequacy of Odyn Code to Demonstrate Reactor Scram Curve.Applicant Will Not Be Required to Perform Analyses W/Odyn Code at CP Stage ML20032B0111981-10-30030 October 1981 Transcript of 811030 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 19,593-19,862. Gotchy,Litton,Gunther & Malec Testimonies,Exhibits, Affidavits & Impact of U Fuel Cycle Encl ML20032B2041981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Jf Knight & Je Kennedy Re ASLB Questions on Scram Discharge Level Monitoring Sys.Transmitters Measuring Scram Discharge Vol Level Must Conform to Category I Environ Qualification Requirements ML20032A9911981-10-29029 October 1981 Transcript of 811029 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 19,331-19,592. Field,Martin,Malec & Chiou Testimony,Exhibits,Topical Repts, Errata,Prof Qualifications & Other Supportive Documentation Encl ML20032B0041981-10-28028 October 1981 Transcript of 811028 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx. Pp 19,074-19,330 ML20032A9901981-10-27027 October 1981 Transcript of 811027 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,868-19,073. Hou & Peterson Testimony,Affidavits & Prof Qualifications Encl ML20032A9881981-10-26026 October 1981 Transcript of 811026 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,606-18,867. Urbanik & Kantor Testimony & Other Supportive Documentation Encl ML20011A6301981-10-22022 October 1981 Testimony of FB Litton Re Doherty Contention 43 on Stainless Steel Cleaning & Reg Guide 1.54.Applicant Meets All Applicable NRC Licensing Requirements Re Cleaning & Coating Matls for CP ML20031E5501981-10-14014 October 1981 Table 1 & Attachment 1,inadvertently Omitted from 811009 Testimony Re Increased Risk of Cancer & Noncancerous Effects from App I Levels of Radiation ML20031E5511981-10-14014 October 1981 Testimony of T Urbanik Re Evacuation Time Estimate Study. Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6951981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Rl Gotchy Re Potential Public Health Impact of Rn-222 Releases Resulting from U Mining & Milling.Average Annual Dose Increase Insignificant ML20031D7111981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Rl Grubb Re Core Lateral Support (Doherty Contention 45).Reactor Core Will Withstand Combined Seismic/Loca Loadings.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6631981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of F Kantor Re Emergency Planning Issue (Schuessler Consolidated Contention 1).Applicant Info Meets App E,Part Ii,Item H Requirements.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6841981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Hou Re Control Rod Ejection (Doherty Contention 28).Facility Protective Measures Ensure Public Safety for Postulated Rod Ejection Accident.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6741981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Mb Fields Re Bypass Leakage (Mccorkle Contention 17) ML20031D6831981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Hou Re Flow Induced Vibration (Tx Pirg Contention 11 & Doherty Contention 31).Applicant Info Adequate for CP Application.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D7161981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of FB Litton Re Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking/Water Hammer (Doherty Contention 44).Applicant Program Complies W/Nrc Recommendations to Minimize Occurrences ML20031D6701981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Rl Gotchy Re Increased Risk of Cancer & Noncancerous Effects from App I Levels of Radiation (Cummings Contention 9).Health Effects Models Underestimated Health Risks ML20031D6781981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Mb Fields Re Suppression Pool Swell (Doherty Contention 5) ML20031D7171981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of FB Litton Re Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking (Tx Pirg Contention 10) ML20031D8561981-10-0909 October 1981 Transcript of 811009 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx. Pp 18,450-18,605.LA Gunther & RA Frazar Testimony Re Doherty Contention 35 (Welding) & Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6711981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Mb Fields Re Mannings Coefficient (Tx Pirg Contention 6) ML20031D8401981-10-0808 October 1981 Transcript of 811008 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,218-18,449. F Allenspach & J Gilray Testimony & Organization & Staffing to Oversee Design & Const Encl ML20031D8541981-10-0707 October 1981 Transcript of 811007 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,014- 18,217.GW Oprea & Jh Goldberg Testimony Encl ML20031D8381981-10-0606 October 1981 Transcript of 811006 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 17,800-18,013. Testimony of M Mitchell,M Hodges,T Huang,C Ferrell & L Soffer Encl ML20031D8531981-10-0505 October 1981 Transcript of 811005 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 17,574- 17,799 ML20031A3791981-09-18018 September 1981 Transcript of 810918 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 17,391- 17,573.Prof Qualifications of El Murri,Wr Griffin & RW Lawhn Encl ML20031H4671981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Mk Mitchell Re Doherty Contention 38(b) on Cold Shutdown within 24 Hours.No NRC Requirements Specify Facility Be Designed to Be Capable of Being Brought to Cold Shutdown in 24 Hours ML20031H4831981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of La Gunther & RA Frazer Re Doherty Contention 35 on Welding.Describes Planned Welding Program.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031H4821981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Ma Lugo Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 6 on Mannings Coefficient & ASLB Question on Svc Level Stress Limits.Margin of Safety Above Design Pressure at 15 Psig Is 35 Psig.Prof Qualifications ML20031H3641981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of La Gunther & Wf Malec Re Tx Pirg Contention 10, Doherty Contentions 44 & 43 & ASLB Question on Reg Guide 1.54 ML20031H4581981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of RR Hobson & Jg Dunlap Re Doherty Contention 45 on Core Lateral Support.Facility Fuel Assemblies Comply W/Recommendations in NUREG/CR-1018.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031H4791981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of DA Nuto Re Doherty Contention 5 Re Supression Pool Uplift.Suppression Pool Swell Effects During LOCA Will Not Cause Structural Damage to Steel Platform Supporting Hydraulic Control Units.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031H3791981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of G Martin & Wf Malec Re Mccorkle Contention 17 on Bypass Leakage.Aslb Statement Correct That No Difference Exists in % by Weight & % by Vol ML20031H4731981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Gm Gordon Re Tx Pirg Contention 10,Doherty Contentions 10,43 & 44 ML20031H3461981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Sp Congdon Re Doherty Contention 15 on Wigle Computer Code.No Basis for Contention.Criteria Contained in Spert Rept Irrelevant to Scram Reactivity Calculations 1982-04-14
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20054B6981982-04-14014 April 1982 Transcript of 820414 Hearing.Pp 21,787-22,027 ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20049J9651982-03-24024 March 1982 Testimony of Fr Allenspach & JW Gilray Per ASLB 810128 Order Re Doherty Renewed Motion for Addl Evidence on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31.Quadrex Rept Does Not Alter Previous Conclusions That Applicant Technically Qualified ML20038D0461981-12-0909 December 1981 Transcript of 811209 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx. Pp 21,103-21,328 ML20038D0451981-12-0808 December 1981 Transcript of 811208 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,939- 21,102 ML20038D0441981-12-0707 December 1981 Trancript of 811207 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,774- 20,938 ML20033A3281981-11-20020 November 1981 Transcript of 811120 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,650- 20,773.Related Documentation Encl ML20033A3471981-11-18018 November 1981 Transcript of 811118 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 20,276- 20,407 ML20033A3571981-11-17017 November 1981 Transcript of 811117 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 200,070- 20,145 & 20,152-20,275.Related Documentation Encl ML20033A3391981-11-16016 November 1981 Transcript of 811116 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 19,863- 20,069.Affidavits & Related Documentation Encl ML20032B2081981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Wl Brooks Re Doherty Contention 15 That Industry Std Power Excursion Theory Inadequate to Represent Increase in Heat Energy Due to Rapid Increase in Reactivity in Design Based Power Excursion Accident ML20032B2131981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Wl Brooks Re Doherty Contention 24.Basis Has Been Developed for Conclusions That Potential Worth of Postulated Dropped Rod Sufficiently Small to Prevent Peak Energy Yield of 280 Cal./Gm ML20032B2021981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Vth Leung Re Doherty Contention 11 on Fuel Pool Integrity Consequences When Spent Fuel Assembly Dropped on Pool Floor.Dropped Assembly Would Not Penetrate Steel Liner. Concrete Floor Below Steel Liner Would Not Be Damaged ML20032B2101981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Wl Brooks Re Doherty Contention 21 on Core Power Density & Adequacy of Odyn Code to Demonstrate Reactor Scram Curve.Applicant Will Not Be Required to Perform Analyses W/Odyn Code at CP Stage ML20032B0111981-10-30030 October 1981 Transcript of 811030 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 19,593-19,862. Gotchy,Litton,Gunther & Malec Testimonies,Exhibits, Affidavits & Impact of U Fuel Cycle Encl ML20032B2041981-10-30030 October 1981 Testimony of Jf Knight & Je Kennedy Re ASLB Questions on Scram Discharge Level Monitoring Sys.Transmitters Measuring Scram Discharge Vol Level Must Conform to Category I Environ Qualification Requirements ML20032A9911981-10-29029 October 1981 Transcript of 811029 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 19,331-19,592. Field,Martin,Malec & Chiou Testimony,Exhibits,Topical Repts, Errata,Prof Qualifications & Other Supportive Documentation Encl ML20032B0041981-10-28028 October 1981 Transcript of 811028 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx. Pp 19,074-19,330 ML20032A9901981-10-27027 October 1981 Transcript of 811027 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,868-19,073. Hou & Peterson Testimony,Affidavits & Prof Qualifications Encl ML20032A9881981-10-26026 October 1981 Transcript of 811026 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,606-18,867. Urbanik & Kantor Testimony & Other Supportive Documentation Encl ML20011A6301981-10-22022 October 1981 Testimony of FB Litton Re Doherty Contention 43 on Stainless Steel Cleaning & Reg Guide 1.54.Applicant Meets All Applicable NRC Licensing Requirements Re Cleaning & Coating Matls for CP ML20031E5501981-10-14014 October 1981 Table 1 & Attachment 1,inadvertently Omitted from 811009 Testimony Re Increased Risk of Cancer & Noncancerous Effects from App I Levels of Radiation ML20031E5511981-10-14014 October 1981 Testimony of T Urbanik Re Evacuation Time Estimate Study. Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6951981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Rl Gotchy Re Potential Public Health Impact of Rn-222 Releases Resulting from U Mining & Milling.Average Annual Dose Increase Insignificant ML20031D7111981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Rl Grubb Re Core Lateral Support (Doherty Contention 45).Reactor Core Will Withstand Combined Seismic/Loca Loadings.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6631981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of F Kantor Re Emergency Planning Issue (Schuessler Consolidated Contention 1).Applicant Info Meets App E,Part Ii,Item H Requirements.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6841981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Hou Re Control Rod Ejection (Doherty Contention 28).Facility Protective Measures Ensure Public Safety for Postulated Rod Ejection Accident.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6741981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Mb Fields Re Bypass Leakage (Mccorkle Contention 17) ML20031D6831981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Hou Re Flow Induced Vibration (Tx Pirg Contention 11 & Doherty Contention 31).Applicant Info Adequate for CP Application.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D7161981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of FB Litton Re Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking/Water Hammer (Doherty Contention 44).Applicant Program Complies W/Nrc Recommendations to Minimize Occurrences ML20031D6701981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Rl Gotchy Re Increased Risk of Cancer & Noncancerous Effects from App I Levels of Radiation (Cummings Contention 9).Health Effects Models Underestimated Health Risks ML20031D6781981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Mb Fields Re Suppression Pool Swell (Doherty Contention 5) ML20031D7171981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of FB Litton Re Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking (Tx Pirg Contention 10) ML20031D8561981-10-0909 October 1981 Transcript of 811009 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx. Pp 18,450-18,605.LA Gunther & RA Frazar Testimony Re Doherty Contention 35 (Welding) & Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031D6711981-10-0909 October 1981 Testimony of Mb Fields Re Mannings Coefficient (Tx Pirg Contention 6) ML20031D8401981-10-0808 October 1981 Transcript of 811008 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,218-18,449. F Allenspach & J Gilray Testimony & Organization & Staffing to Oversee Design & Const Encl ML20031D8541981-10-0707 October 1981 Transcript of 811007 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 18,014- 18,217.GW Oprea & Jh Goldberg Testimony Encl ML20031D8381981-10-0606 October 1981 Transcript of 811006 Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 17,800-18,013. Testimony of M Mitchell,M Hodges,T Huang,C Ferrell & L Soffer Encl ML20031D8531981-10-0505 October 1981 Transcript of 811005 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 17,574- 17,799 ML20031A3791981-09-18018 September 1981 Transcript of 810918 CP Hearing in Houston,Tx.Pp 17,391- 17,573.Prof Qualifications of El Murri,Wr Griffin & RW Lawhn Encl ML20031H4671981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Mk Mitchell Re Doherty Contention 38(b) on Cold Shutdown within 24 Hours.No NRC Requirements Specify Facility Be Designed to Be Capable of Being Brought to Cold Shutdown in 24 Hours ML20031H4831981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of La Gunther & RA Frazer Re Doherty Contention 35 on Welding.Describes Planned Welding Program.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031H4821981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Ma Lugo Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 6 on Mannings Coefficient & ASLB Question on Svc Level Stress Limits.Margin of Safety Above Design Pressure at 15 Psig Is 35 Psig.Prof Qualifications ML20031H3641981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of La Gunther & Wf Malec Re Tx Pirg Contention 10, Doherty Contentions 44 & 43 & ASLB Question on Reg Guide 1.54 ML20031H4581981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of RR Hobson & Jg Dunlap Re Doherty Contention 45 on Core Lateral Support.Facility Fuel Assemblies Comply W/Recommendations in NUREG/CR-1018.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031H4791981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of DA Nuto Re Doherty Contention 5 Re Supression Pool Uplift.Suppression Pool Swell Effects During LOCA Will Not Cause Structural Damage to Steel Platform Supporting Hydraulic Control Units.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20031H3791981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of G Martin & Wf Malec Re Mccorkle Contention 17 on Bypass Leakage.Aslb Statement Correct That No Difference Exists in % by Weight & % by Vol ML20031H4731981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Gm Gordon Re Tx Pirg Contention 10,Doherty Contentions 10,43 & 44 ML20031H3461981-09-18018 September 1981 Testimony of Sp Congdon Re Doherty Contention 15 on Wigle Computer Code.No Basis for Contention.Criteria Contained in Spert Rept Irrelevant to Scram Reactivity Calculations 1982-04-14
[Table view] |
Text
May 11, 1981 4
RELATED CORRESPONDENCE p
cocwd b
1
'INITED STATES OF AMERICA ff M*U in CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION op MAY 13 gggg y y
'y 2
3 BEFORE TriE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD 6
%7 z
4 N
5 In the Matter of
)
)
6 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY
) Docket No. 50-466
)
7 (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating
)
Station, Unit No. 1)
)
8:
)
9 TESTIMONY OF RICHARD A.
CLARKE AND 10-JOSEPH F. MONTALBANO ON BEHALF OF HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY 11 ON DOHF'_Y CONTENTION 10 -
DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY 12 13 0
Mr. Clarke, please state your name and place of employment.
14 A.
My name is Richard A.
Clarke and I am employed by the 15 General Electric Company as a Senior Engineer in the 16 Systems Engineering Section.
17 0
Would you describe your professional qualifications?
18 A.
My professional qualifications are set 19 forth in Exhibit RAC-1 to this testimony.
20 0.
Mr. Montalbano, please state your name and place of 21 employment.
22 A.
My name is Joseph F. Montalbano and I am employed by 23 Ebasco Services, Inc. as a Supervising Electrical Engineer.
24 Q.
Would you describe your professional qualifications?
25 A.
My professional qualifications are set 26 forth in Exhibit JFM-1 to this testimony.
27 Q.
Mr. Clarke, what is the purpose of this testimony?
28 A.
The purpose of this testimony is to address Mr. Doherty's 810519a 626
1,
2 contention which alleges that the diesel generator system 3
for the High Pressure Core Spray (HPCS) system at 4
Allens Creek as well as the rest of the nuclear plant 5
is not reliable in start uand operation.
As a basis 6
for the contention, Mr. Doherty cites Nuclear Safety, 7
Volume 19, No. 1 and Volume 20, No. 1 and No. 2, which 8
report instances of past failures of diesel generator 9
systems.
Mr. Doherty also cites an NRC contractor report 10 NUREG/CR-0660 " Enhancement of On-Site Emergency Diesel 11 Reliability" which examines the past diesel generator 12 system failures cited in Nuclear Safety and other 13 publications and makes specific recommendations to 14 address the root causes of the failures.
15 The testimony will describe Applicant's responses 16 to the recommendations of NUREG/CR-0660 and Applicant's 17 evaluation of NRC Inspection and Enforcement Circulars 18 which pertain to diesel generator systems reliability.
19 I will address the HPCS diesel generator while 20 Mr. Montalbano will address the Division 1 and Division 21 2 safety diesel generators.
22 Q.
Mr. Clarke, directing your attention to the HPCS diesel 23 generator, and Mr. Montalbano, directing your attention 24 to the Divisions 1 and 2 safety diesel generators, please 25 describe Applicant's responses to the recommendations 26 of NUREG/CR-0660.
27 A.
The stated intent of the program described by NUREG/CR-28 0660 is to arrive at specific recommendations for ACNGS
C 1.
2 aimed toward preventing the occurrence at ACNGS of diesel 8
generator problems observed at operating plants.
To ensure 4
that the concerns listed in this document have been ad-5 dressed, an item by item response is provided below.
As 6
in NUREG/CR-0660, the responses are classified into 7
three basic categories based upon the suggested 8-corrective action.
These are:
9 A.
Most Significant Corrective Action 10 (1)
Air Dryers in compressed Air starting systems 11 Water in the air starting systems has caused 12 rust, pipe scale, and corrosion to take place in the air 13 starting system piping.
This in turn has caused corrosion, 14 jamning and scoring of the internal surfaces of the starting 15 motors.
In order to keep the moisture in the air from 16 condensing in the compressed air starting systems, NUREG/
17 CR-0660 recommends the use of air dryers, specifically 18 the refrigerant type.
19 The purpose of an air dryer is to reduce the 20 pressure dewpoint of the compressed air in the starting 21 system to a value below the ambient air.
The pressure 22 devpoint of the air is a function of the amount of l
28 moisture mixed with the air.
By removir.c moisture 24 with the ait dryers, the pressure dewpoint is lowered, l
l 25 thereby lowering the temperature at which the remaining 26 water in the compressed air will condense.
Regenerative 27 dessicant dryers are currently specified for use in the i
28 air starting systems of all three Allens Creek safety l
I
1,
2, diesel engines.
This type of air dryer removes moisture 3
by an adsorptive process.
The refrigerant type dryer pre-4 ferred by NUREG/CR-0660 will be evaluated for use on the 5
Allens Creek safety diesel engines.
Such an evaluation 6
will include the considerations raised by NUREG/CR-0660 as 7
well as the recommendations of the diesel engine suppliers.
8' (2)
Air Quality in Diesel Generator Room 9
This section focuses upon failures which have 10 occurred due to the build up of dust and grit on the 11 contacts of electrical relays.
At Allens Creek, due to 12 the large volume of air which is required to maintain 13 the appropriate room temperature, the ventilation air 14 cannot be restricted to an elevation 20 feet above ad-15 jacent ground surfaces.
However, the Allens Creek 16 specification requires that a NEMA 12 enclosure (dust 17 tight) be provided for instruments, relays, control 18 switches etc.
Where louvered cabinets are required 19 for proper heat dissipation, washable filters will be 20 provided to preclude the entrance of foreign material.
21 (3;
(3)
Turbocharger Heavy Duty Gear Dri,ve 22 The turbocharger deficiencies reported in 23 NUREG/CR-0660 deal with the two-cycle diesel engine 24 produced by General Motors, which is used as the 25 standby power supply for the HPCS.
A two-cycle 26 diesel engine does not have enough energy in the 27 exhaust gases at no load to drive the turbocharger.
28 Therefore, the turbocharger is mechanically gear
1, 2l' driven at no load and at light load conditions.
3 The turbocharger gear drive has experienced some 4
failures due to a horsepower overload at no load or 5
light load conditions.
This situation can be remedied by either placing limits on light load or no load opera-6l 7l tion which are extremely restrictive, or by upgrading 8
the strength of the gear drive and thus relaxing the no 9
load and light generating restrictions.
HL&P has 10, chosen to replace the present 18:1 gear ratio with the 11 new 17.9:? heavy duty gear drive assembly.
This will 12 result in the following warranted no load and light 13 load operation:
14 (a) 2000 hours0.0231 days <br />0.556 hours <br />0.00331 weeks <br />7.61e-4 months <br /> accumulative time at less 15 than 20% of rated load; 16 (b) 4000 hours0.0463 days <br />1.111 hours <br />0.00661 weeks <br />0.00152 months <br /> accumulative time limit between l'7 20-50% of rated load.
18 The Division 1 and Division 2 safety diesels for Allens 19 Creek are four-cycle engines which utilized a gas turbine 20 turbocharger.
With this arrangement, the engine is 21 naturally aspirated during starting and low power 22 operation.
The gas turbine turbocharger provides the 28 appropriate air mixture when the unit is operating at 24 rated load.
Therefore, due to the nature of the design, 25 the deficiencies reported in this section of the NUREG 26 are not applicable to the Allens creek Divisions 1 and 27 2 safety diesels.
28
1.
2 (4)
Personnel Training 3
Personnel training will be conducted by 4
HL&P to insure that maintenance personnel are cognizant 5
of the prescribed maintenance procedures.
6 B.
Significant Corrective Action 7
(1-2) Pre-Lube 8
This section recommends a pre-lube period of 9
3 to 5 minutes for all non-emergency starts.
For emer-10 gency starts, it is recommended that the engine pre-lube 11 be started by the same signal which initiates the cranking 12 of the engine.
13 The Allens Creek design (for all three safety 14 diesels) incorporates a continuous lube oil circulating 15 system which eliminates the need for a pre-lube period.
For 16 the HPCS diesel generator there are two AC powered motor 17 driven lube oil pumps.
One pump is dedicated to keeping 18 the turbocharger bearings lubricated while the other is 19 dedicated to keeping the filter / cooler rack full and the 20 main engine bearings pre-lubed.
21 For the Division 1 and Division 2 safety 22 diesels, the continuous lube oil system has a small AC 28 motor driven pre-lube pump designed to keep the cylinder 24 head rocker assembly lubricated when the engine is shut-25 down and a larger AC motor driven pump which provides 26 continuous pre-lubrication at keep-warm temperature 27 to the rest of the engine and keeps all external 28 systems full.
1
_7_
2 (3)
Testing, Test Loading and Preventive Maintenance All testing procedures and preventive main-4 tenance procedures to be utilized for the diesel generators will be formulated in accordance with the NRC and the manufacturer's specific recommendations.
7 (4)
" Root Cause" and Correction Action This section deals specifically with the g
identification of the real reason, i.e.,
" root cause" of any engine / generator malfunction.
HL&P operating personnel will be trained to determine and correct the g
" root cause" of diesel generator malfunctions.
C.
Additional Corrective Action (1)
DG Room Ventilation & Combustion Air Inlets g
(a)
Recommendations discussed below reduce g
the amount of dust / contaminants in and around the diesel.
p In accordance with recommendation C.la of NUREG/CR-0660, g
4 combustion air is extracted from the outside at an g
elevation 35 feet above the finished floor, filtered g
and then ducted directly to the diesel generator air 21 intake.
g (b)
As noted in Item A-2, C.lb of NUREG/CR-g 0660 is addressed as follows:
room ventilation is taken g
in at a level starting 3 1/2 feet above grade (Elev.
g 142'6") up to an elevation of 173 ft.
This arrange-g ment is necessary to provide adequate surface area of g
louvers so as to control the maximum room temperature.
g 1
1 t 2
(c)
In accordance with recommendation C.lc 3,
of MUREG/OR-0660, room ventilation air and engine exhaust 4'-
gases are expelled directly to the atmosphere.
5 (2)
Fuel Storage Bui.lding 6
As recommended by NUREG/CR-0660, the ACNGS bulk 7'
fuel tanks have a gravity drain from the bottom of the S
tank for pumping out accumulated water.
Fuel transfer j
to each of the diesel engine day tanks from the bulk fuel 9
10 tanks is provided by gravity flow.
11 (3)
High Temperature Insulation for Overload 12 In order to protect the generator against 13 overheating in an overload condition, NUREG/CR-0660 14 recommends, as a criteria, that the generator electrical 15 insulation be able to withstand a 105'C rise over a 40*C 16 timbient, for a maximum temperature of 145*C.
17 Each of the three diesel generators has a 18 Class F electrical insulation which is rated for a 105*C 19 rise over a 40*C ambient.
The generators are limited to a 20 80*C rise over a 50*C ambient; yielding a 15'C margin.
21 The amount of margin in the HPCS and Divisions 22 1 and 2 is sufficient for the following reasons:
23 (a)
The HPCS DG is connected to only one 24 large load, the HPCS pump motor.
The DG 25 will be qualified to power that load under 26 emergency conditions.
Therefore, there is 27 no potential for extended overload of the 28 diesel generator.
1,
2 (b)
The continuous rating for the Divisions 3
1 and 2 safety diesel generators is 110% of the 4
continuous rating of the Divisions 1 and 2 5
diesel engines.
This combined with the 6
margin already incorporated in the insulation 7
design eliminates the possibility of overheating 8
the generator durino the postulated engine 9
overload condition.
10 (4)
Engine Cooling Water Temperature Control 11 In accordance with recommendation C.4 of NUREG/
12 CR-0660, the ACNGS diesels accomplish cooling water 13 temperature control by means of a 3-way thermostat for 14 directing the water to 5
, ass the cooler or to the 15 cooler as required.
16 (5)
Concrete Flcors - Painting 17 In accordance with recommendation C.5 of NUREG/
18 CR-0660, the diesel generator building floors will be 19 painted to minimize concrete dust accumulation that might 20 interfere with devices which are part of diesel generator 21 system and which depend on electrical contacts.
22 (6)
Instrumentation and Controls or Monitoring Elements - Mounting and Supports 23 The location of engine / generator control panels will be as specified by the manufacturer.
To the extent functionally practical, sensing instruments and control or monitoring elements will be on free standing, floor mounted panels in accordance with recommendation
1 2 C.6 of NUREG/CR-0660.
3 Q.
Mr. Clarke, please describe HL&P's evaluation of Inspection 4
and Enforcement Circular No. 79-12.
5 A.
On January 28, 1979, the NRC Office of Inspection and 6
Enforcement issued an Inspection and Enforcement Circular 7
No. 79-12 titled " Potential Diesel Generator Turbocharger 8
Problem".
In this IE circular the NRC identified a 9
potential failure of the turbocharger en diesels manu-f 10 factured by the Electro-Motive Division (EMD) of the 11 General Motors Corporation.
12 The problem that was cited occurred if the diesel 13 engine received a repeated rapid start within a 15 minute 14 to 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> time period after a shutdown from a previous run 15 in which the engine had reached operating temperature.
16 During normal standby the flow from the circulating 17 oil pump is divided via a 30 psi spring loaded check valve 18 into separate flows to the turbocharger bearings and to 19 the accessory rack.
This flow split keeps the turbo-20 charger bearings prelubed and the accessory rack filled 21 and primed for a fast start.
However, when the oil is 22 hot, insufficient oil pressure is generated to accomplish 23 the flow split.
As a result all the circulating oil is 24 supplied to the turbocharger bearings and the ac-25 cessory rack partially drains.
Upon restart the engine 26 driven scavenger pump must first fill the accessory rack 27 before oil can be supplied to the main engine oil sump.
28 This temporary loss of main engine oil pressure can
o 1.
2 result in cumulative damage to the turbocharger hearings.
3 The Allens Creek HPCS diesel is manufactured by 4
EMD.
However, the Allens Creek design utilizes two in-5 dependent flow paths, each with its own pump.
One pump 6
supplies the turbocharger bearings and the other pump 7
supplies the accessory rack.
With this arrangement, the lube 8
oil system will retuain primed and ready for a restart and 9
the 15 minute to 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> restriction will be eliminated.
10 Q.
Describe HL&P's evaluation of Inspection and Enforcement 11 Information Notice No. 79-23.
12 A.
On February 26, 1979, the NRC Office of Inspection and 13 Enforcement issued Inspection and Enforcement Notice No.
14 79-23 titled " Emergency Diesel Generator Lube Oil Coolers".
15 This notice reported the failure of tube sheets in lube 16 oil coolers of diesels manufactured by the Electro-Motive 17 Division of General Motors.
The failed tube sheets were 18 1/8" thick and had soldered joints.
Corrosion of the 19 soldered joints caused the failures.
The tube sheets 20 used on the Allens Creek HPCS diesel generator are 21 jointed by a rolling process and are 1/2" thick.
The J
22 increased thickness and the elimination of the soldered 23 joint will preclude this problem on ACNGS.
24 Q.
What are your conclusions?
25 A.
Improvements in the design of the diesel generators 26 systems have been made to address NUREG/CR-0660 and 27 various I&E Bulletins.
These design improvement will 28 ensure high reliability for the ACNGS diesel generators.
i
1 Exhibit RAC-1 2!
EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 3
Richard A. Clarke 4
Mr. Clarke is currently a Senior Engineer in the Systems 5
Engineering Section of the Nuclear Control and Instrumentation 6
Department of the Nuclear Energy Business Group of the General 7'
Electri c Company.
In this capacity, Mr. Clarke is assigned 8
the task of providing follow-up engineering and licensing 9
services as required to support General Electric contracts, 10 in the area of the HPCS system.
Previously, Mr. Clarke was 11 the Lead Engineer in charge of Electronic Design of a Solid 12 State Protection System for a BWR nuclear plant.
Past 13 experience also includes etart-up work on five nuclear 14 plants and includes work on several standby diesel generator 15 power systems.
16 Mr. Clarke has twelve years of power plant engineering 17 experience, and a BS Degree in Electrical Engineering from 18 the University of Santa Clara (1969).
19 20 21 22 2h 24 25 26 27 28
1 EXHIBIT JFM-1 EDUCATION 7?iD PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 2l-JOSEPH F. MONTALBANO 8
4' EXPERIENCE
SUMMARY
Registered Professional Engineer with nine years of 5l 6l experience in electrical design engineering of fossil-and 7
nuclear-fueled electric generating stations.
Responsibilities 8
included developing the electrical system and basic design 9
criteria for each project, application of computer analyses 10 for an optimum electrical auxiliary system, develop:cnt of 11 electrical main and auxiliary one-line diagrams, input 12 criteria fo' physical design drawings for the station, 13 economic analysis of equipment options, preparation of 14 equipment specifications, purchase requisitions, bid evaluations 15 and recommendations for purchase, surveillance of equipment 16 orders for compliance with specification and required-at-site 17 dates, and engineering support to field forces.
18 Administrative responsibilities have included project 19 implementation of OA Programs, development of CPM logic and 20 manpower forecasts and resources and exercising job control 21 by monitoring schedule and workday and Earned Value reports.
22 Responsible for distribution system design for 5 kV 23 and 13 kV underground networks including conductor selection, 24 cable and transformer selection and location and impedance 25 calculations.
26 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 27 Ebasco Services Incorporated, New York, New York; 28 1972 - Present
i i
O 1 Supervising Engineer, 1981-Present 2
h 3'
Principal Engineer, 1980-1981 Senior Engineer, 1977-1980 4
Engineer, 1975-1977 5..
li Associate Engineer, 1974-1975 6
f Assistant Engineer, 1972-1974 7
p; 8
I EDUCATION 9l.
Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn-BSEE-1972 l
10 '
Polytechaic Institute of New York-MSEE-1977 11 New York Institute of Technology-MBA-1981 12 13 REGISTRATIONS 14 Professional Engineer in the States of New York 15 and New Jersey.
16 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS 17 IEEE-Member 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
. - - - - -