|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20063N7471982-10-0606 October 1982 Motion for Termination of Proceedings.Util Decided to Cancel Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063N7591982-10-0606 October 1982 Withdrawal of Application for CP ML20055A7221982-07-15015 July 1982 Memorandum & Order Denying Jf Doherty 820615 Submittals, Treated as Motion to Reconsider ASLB 820602 Order.Motion Untimely Filed & Failed to Show Significance or Gravity of Issues ML20055A3551982-07-12012 July 1982 Amended Contention 59.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L4521982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Fails to Establish Timeliness &/Or Significance of Issues Sought to Be Raised.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5531982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Should Be Considered Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 820602 Order.Timeliness & Significance of Issues Not Established.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054J9371982-06-28028 June 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Request to Reopen Record. Request Improper & Insufficient to Support Relief.Commission Rules Cannot Be Circumvented by Refiling Same Argument After ASLB Ruling Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9861982-06-15015 June 1982 Motion to Reopen Record to Take Evidence on Contention 59. Gravity of Issues Warrants Reopening ML20054G0171982-06-15015 June 1982 Contention 50 Re Brown & Root Deficiencies in Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0861982-05-24024 May 1982 Response in Opposition to Util 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations.Contention Should Be Treated as Such,Not as Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20052H8621982-05-19019 May 1982 Motion to Strike J Doherty Reply to Applicant 820507 Response to Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58. Commission Rules Do Not Allow Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052H4441982-05-14014 May 1982 Reply Opposing Applicant 820507 Response to J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Contention Should Be Admitted W/Amends.Aslb Should Judge Conduct of Applicants. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F3121982-05-0707 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention Re Alleged Failure to Rept Design Defects.Substantively, Motion Is Motion to Reopen Record & Stds Have Not Been Met. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052D1221982-04-29029 April 1982 Findings of Fact on Supplemental Issues to Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4541982-04-22022 April 1982 Submittal of Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations at Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E0561982-04-21021 April 1982 Supplemental Findings of Fact on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050J1111982-04-0606 April 1982 Answers to Second & Third Sets of Interrogatories,Questions 29 & 8 Respectively,Re Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20050E2961982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Seventh Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050E2891982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Doherty Sixth Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20050C4211982-04-0202 April 1982 Objections to Request for Admissions.Requests Untimely, Irrelevant to Issues Before ASLB & Extremely & Unduly Burdensome.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4081982-03-31031 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Fifth Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4791982-03-29029 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Jf Doherty Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042C6431982-03-29029 March 1982 Motion for ASLB to Call DE Sells as Witness for Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Testimony Needed to Explain Why NRC Did Not Immediately Obtain Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6181982-03-29029 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820315 Motion for ASLB to Subpoena Quadrex Corp Employee Witnesses as ASLB Witnesses. Request Is Based on Misperception of Scope of Reopened Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5091982-03-26026 March 1982 Response to Jf Doherty 20th & 21st Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20049K0801982-03-25025 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0671982-03-25025 March 1982 Reply to Tx Pirg 820315 Addl Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5201982-03-25025 March 1982 Motion to Compel Discovery from Applicant & to Postpone Evidentiary Presentations at 820412 Hearings.Applicant Objections to Interrogatories Unsupported & Necessitate Hearings Be Delayed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0941982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Second Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0841982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Third Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5481982-03-23023 March 1982 Fourth Set of Requests for Admissions Re Quadrex Rept & Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2351982-03-17017 March 1982 Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A4791982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearings.Sufficient Grounds Not Provided to Justify Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2451982-03-15015 March 1982 Motion for Subpoena of Quadrex Corp Employees.Testimony Necessary for Clear Understanding of Brown & Root Deficiencies Despite Util Supervision & Specific Steps Needed to Correct & Prevent Problems.W/Certificate of Svc ML20042B2381982-03-15015 March 1982 Sixth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041F0761982-03-10010 March 1982 Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041F0871982-03-10010 March 1982 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearing on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Addl Time Needed to Complete Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049J6571982-03-0808 March 1982 Answers to First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1741982-03-0505 March 1982 Brief Opposing R Alexander Appeal from ASLB 820112 Order Denying Petition to Intervene.Aslb Did Not Abuse Discretion in Denying Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1201982-03-0505 March 1982 Motion for Order Directing Applicant to Provide Forthcoming Bechtel Quadrex Rept Review.Rept Pertinent to Remaining Issue.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041E1181982-03-0505 March 1982 Third Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Related Correspondence ML20041E1071982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1001982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E0711982-03-0404 March 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 21 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20049H8881982-03-0101 March 1982 Response Opposing D Marrack 820213 Motion for Review of Dates for Reopening Hearings & Continuance.No Commission Regulations or Atomic Energy Act Provisions Require Applicant Irrevocable Commitment.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5381982-02-22022 February 1982 Reply to Intervenors Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041C0671982-02-22022 February 1982 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 820209 Motion for Addl Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law.Motion Mooted by Tx Pirg Filing Proposed Findings on 820212. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5421982-02-17017 February 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1982-07-02
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009H2161981-07-30030 July 1981 Suppl Testimony of D Marrack Re Viable Fishery ML20009E3641981-07-24024 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 17 Re Tnt Detonation ML20009E8661981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of DA Hamon Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 55 (Rapid Depressurization - Steam Break).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E2941981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 8 (Reactor Bldg Subsurface Soil Mechanics) ML20009E2961981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of R Cheng Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 10 (Drywell Pressure Testing).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3531981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 29,blockage of Intake Canal ML20009E3591981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Cg Robertson Testimony Re Doherty Contention 8 & ASLB Question 3 on Atws.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3031981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of GL Sozzi on Doherty Contention 32 Re ECCS Vaporization Rate ML20009E3151981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rl Call 810720 Testimony on Doherty Contention 26 (Stud Bolts).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E4351981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Gw Oprea & Jh Goldberg Testimonies on Technical Qualifications & Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 31.Corporate Nuclear Organization Chart Encl ML20009E3481981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util on Mccorkle Contention 9 Re Chlorine Monitoring.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3451981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 40,10CFR100 Releases.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3431981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 6 & ASLB Question 12 Re Shell Oil Co 6-inch Liquid Petroleum Gas Pipeline ML20009E3171981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Jc Elliott,Tc Cheng,Md Weingart,Pa Ranzau & Cg Robertson 810720 Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group (Prig) Addl Contention 53,ASLB Questions 4B & 4A & Pirg Contentions 28 & 52.W/prof Qualifications ML20009E3211981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of SA Hucilk & Jj Boseman Testimonies on Doherty Contention 17,RL Huang Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group Addl Contention 41 & Jn Bailey Testimony on Doherty Contention 42.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3111981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of MR Lane 810720 Testimony Re Doherty Contention 41 (Reactor Water Level Indicators).Prof Qualifications Encl ML19347F5361981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DG Tees Re Doherty Contention 47,turbine Missiles.Related Correspondence ML19347F5391981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Fj Meyer Re Doherty Contention 30, Interconnection/Grid Stability.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5201981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DC Papone Re Board Question 6,ability of Applicant to Demonstrate Compliance w/10CFR50,App A.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5241981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of RA Clarke & Jf Montalbano Re Doherty Contention 10,diesel Generator Reliability.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5271981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rc Iotti & Ws Carnes Re Doherty Contention 47, Turbine Missiles.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5291981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Doherty Contention 48,control Rod Drive Return Line.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5301981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Cw Dillman Re Doherty Contention 6, Recirculation Pump Overspeed.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5311981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Mf Alesky Re Doherty Contention 50,jet Pump Beams.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5341981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of s Ranganath Re Tx Pirg Contention 39,Generic Task A-11,fracture Toughness.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5351981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rl Baron Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 21, Occupational Exposure.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5321981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Jf Montalbano & FP Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Contention 12,cable Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5371981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Board Question 8,Seismic Category 1 Control Rods.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5221981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of MD Weingart & F Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 10 & Mccorkle Contention 30,charcoal Adsorber Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5151981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of R Williams & N Horton Re Doherty Contentions 14 & 25,on Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor & Fuel Failure/ Flow Blockage,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20003G6781981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 26 Re Computer Code Error.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003G6711981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contentions 3,39 & 20(a) Re Fuel Specific Enthalpy,Fuel Swelling & Gap Conductance,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6751981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Tx Pirg Contention 6 (Mccorkle Contention XI) Re Aircraft Hazards.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6761981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 9 Re Containment Buckling.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6771981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 27 Re Reactor Pedestal.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6741981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contentions 4,5,7,9 & 10 Re Tx Electric Svc Co 24-inch Natural Gas Pipeline & Pipelines Crossing Brazos River Upstream from Facility.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6731981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 7 Re LPCI Cold Slug.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19345H1121981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony Supporting Doherty Contention 3 on Inadequacy of Design Safety Limit of Applicant Fuel Rods.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003B2381981-02-0606 February 1981 Errata Sheet for L Perl Testimony,Page 12,Line 13 & Table 9. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003A2101981-01-27027 January 1981 Errata Sheet to s Michaelson Testimony.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19343B8481980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Bishop Contention 1 Concerning Population Projections ML19340D1401980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony Re Tx Pirg Contention 1(f) Re Population Risks. Pp 1-8 ML19343B8451980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8491980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Site.Tera Corp Coastal Site Comparison Rept, Encl ML19343B8391980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 5 Concerning Solid Waste Combustion ML19343B8471980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Concerning South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek 1. Analysis of Prime Farmland Soils Encl ML19343B8461980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8441980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Re South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek Site.Listing of Cost Savings Encl 1982-03-26
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009H2161981-07-30030 July 1981 Suppl Testimony of D Marrack Re Viable Fishery ML20009E3641981-07-24024 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 17 Re Tnt Detonation ML20009E8661981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of DA Hamon Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 55 (Rapid Depressurization - Steam Break).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E2941981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 8 (Reactor Bldg Subsurface Soil Mechanics) ML20009E2961981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of R Cheng Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 10 (Drywell Pressure Testing).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3531981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 29,blockage of Intake Canal ML20009E3591981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Cg Robertson Testimony Re Doherty Contention 8 & ASLB Question 3 on Atws.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3031981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of GL Sozzi on Doherty Contention 32 Re ECCS Vaporization Rate ML20009E3151981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rl Call 810720 Testimony on Doherty Contention 26 (Stud Bolts).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E4351981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Gw Oprea & Jh Goldberg Testimonies on Technical Qualifications & Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 31.Corporate Nuclear Organization Chart Encl ML20009E3481981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util on Mccorkle Contention 9 Re Chlorine Monitoring.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3451981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 40,10CFR100 Releases.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3431981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 6 & ASLB Question 12 Re Shell Oil Co 6-inch Liquid Petroleum Gas Pipeline ML20009E3171981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Jc Elliott,Tc Cheng,Md Weingart,Pa Ranzau & Cg Robertson 810720 Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group (Prig) Addl Contention 53,ASLB Questions 4B & 4A & Pirg Contentions 28 & 52.W/prof Qualifications ML20009E3211981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of SA Hucilk & Jj Boseman Testimonies on Doherty Contention 17,RL Huang Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group Addl Contention 41 & Jn Bailey Testimony on Doherty Contention 42.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3111981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of MR Lane 810720 Testimony Re Doherty Contention 41 (Reactor Water Level Indicators).Prof Qualifications Encl ML19347F5361981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DG Tees Re Doherty Contention 47,turbine Missiles.Related Correspondence ML19347F5391981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Fj Meyer Re Doherty Contention 30, Interconnection/Grid Stability.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5201981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DC Papone Re Board Question 6,ability of Applicant to Demonstrate Compliance w/10CFR50,App A.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5241981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of RA Clarke & Jf Montalbano Re Doherty Contention 10,diesel Generator Reliability.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5271981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rc Iotti & Ws Carnes Re Doherty Contention 47, Turbine Missiles.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5291981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Doherty Contention 48,control Rod Drive Return Line.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5301981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Cw Dillman Re Doherty Contention 6, Recirculation Pump Overspeed.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5311981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Mf Alesky Re Doherty Contention 50,jet Pump Beams.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5341981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of s Ranganath Re Tx Pirg Contention 39,Generic Task A-11,fracture Toughness.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5351981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rl Baron Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 21, Occupational Exposure.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5321981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Jf Montalbano & FP Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Contention 12,cable Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5371981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Board Question 8,Seismic Category 1 Control Rods.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5221981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of MD Weingart & F Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 10 & Mccorkle Contention 30,charcoal Adsorber Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5151981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of R Williams & N Horton Re Doherty Contentions 14 & 25,on Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor & Fuel Failure/ Flow Blockage,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20003G6781981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 26 Re Computer Code Error.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003G6711981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contentions 3,39 & 20(a) Re Fuel Specific Enthalpy,Fuel Swelling & Gap Conductance,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6751981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Tx Pirg Contention 6 (Mccorkle Contention XI) Re Aircraft Hazards.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6761981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 9 Re Containment Buckling.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6771981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 27 Re Reactor Pedestal.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6741981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contentions 4,5,7,9 & 10 Re Tx Electric Svc Co 24-inch Natural Gas Pipeline & Pipelines Crossing Brazos River Upstream from Facility.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6731981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 7 Re LPCI Cold Slug.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19345H1121981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony Supporting Doherty Contention 3 on Inadequacy of Design Safety Limit of Applicant Fuel Rods.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003B2381981-02-0606 February 1981 Errata Sheet for L Perl Testimony,Page 12,Line 13 & Table 9. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003A2101981-01-27027 January 1981 Errata Sheet to s Michaelson Testimony.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19343B8481980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Bishop Contention 1 Concerning Population Projections ML19340D1401980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony Re Tx Pirg Contention 1(f) Re Population Risks. Pp 1-8 ML19343B8451980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8491980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Site.Tera Corp Coastal Site Comparison Rept, Encl ML19343B8391980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 5 Concerning Solid Waste Combustion ML19343B8471980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Concerning South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek 1. Analysis of Prime Farmland Soils Encl ML19343B8461980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8441980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Re South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek Site.Listing of Cost Savings Encl 1982-03-26
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009H2161981-07-30030 July 1981 Suppl Testimony of D Marrack Re Viable Fishery ML20009E3641981-07-24024 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 17 Re Tnt Detonation ML20009E8661981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of DA Hamon Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 55 (Rapid Depressurization - Steam Break).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E2941981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 8 (Reactor Bldg Subsurface Soil Mechanics) ML20009E2961981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of R Cheng Testimony on Behalf of Applicant Re ASLB Question 10 (Drywell Pressure Testing).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3531981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Wf Mercurio Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 29,blockage of Intake Canal ML20009E3591981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Cg Robertson Testimony Re Doherty Contention 8 & ASLB Question 3 on Atws.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3031981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of GL Sozzi on Doherty Contention 32 Re ECCS Vaporization Rate ML20009E3151981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rl Call 810720 Testimony on Doherty Contention 26 (Stud Bolts).Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E4351981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Gw Oprea & Jh Goldberg Testimonies on Technical Qualifications & Tx Public Interest Research Group Addl Contention 31.Corporate Nuclear Organization Chart Encl ML20009E3481981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util on Mccorkle Contention 9 Re Chlorine Monitoring.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3451981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of G Martin Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contention 40,10CFR100 Releases.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3431981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Rc Iotti Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contention 6 & ASLB Question 12 Re Shell Oil Co 6-inch Liquid Petroleum Gas Pipeline ML20009E3171981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of Jc Elliott,Tc Cheng,Md Weingart,Pa Ranzau & Cg Robertson 810720 Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group (Prig) Addl Contention 53,ASLB Questions 4B & 4A & Pirg Contentions 28 & 52.W/prof Qualifications ML20009E3211981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of SA Hucilk & Jj Boseman Testimonies on Doherty Contention 17,RL Huang Testimony on Tx Public Research Interest Group Addl Contention 41 & Jn Bailey Testimony on Doherty Contention 42.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20009E3111981-07-20020 July 1981 Transcript of MR Lane 810720 Testimony Re Doherty Contention 41 (Reactor Water Level Indicators).Prof Qualifications Encl ML19347F5361981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DG Tees Re Doherty Contention 47,turbine Missiles.Related Correspondence ML19347F5391981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Fj Meyer Re Doherty Contention 30, Interconnection/Grid Stability.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5201981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of DC Papone Re Board Question 6,ability of Applicant to Demonstrate Compliance w/10CFR50,App A.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5241981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of RA Clarke & Jf Montalbano Re Doherty Contention 10,diesel Generator Reliability.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5271981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rc Iotti & Ws Carnes Re Doherty Contention 47, Turbine Missiles.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5291981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Doherty Contention 48,control Rod Drive Return Line.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5301981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Cw Dillman Re Doherty Contention 6, Recirculation Pump Overspeed.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5311981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Mf Alesky Re Doherty Contention 50,jet Pump Beams.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5341981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of s Ranganath Re Tx Pirg Contention 39,Generic Task A-11,fracture Toughness.Prof Qualifications Encl. Related Correspondence ML19347F5351981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Rl Baron Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 21, Occupational Exposure.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5321981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Jf Montalbano & FP Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Contention 12,cable Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5371981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of Ma Ross Re Board Question 8,Seismic Category 1 Control Rods.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5221981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of MD Weingart & F Barbieri Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 10 & Mccorkle Contention 30,charcoal Adsorber Fires.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML19347F5151981-05-11011 May 1981 Testimony of R Williams & N Horton Re Doherty Contentions 14 & 25,on Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor & Fuel Failure/ Flow Blockage,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl.Related Correspondence ML20003G6781981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 26 Re Computer Code Error.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003G6711981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Doherty Contentions 3,39 & 20(a) Re Fuel Specific Enthalpy,Fuel Swelling & Gap Conductance,Respectively.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6751981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Tx Pirg Contention 6 (Mccorkle Contention XI) Re Aircraft Hazards.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6761981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 9 Re Containment Buckling.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6771981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 27 Re Reactor Pedestal.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6741981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Bishop Contentions 4,5,7,9 & 10 Re Tx Electric Svc Co 24-inch Natural Gas Pipeline & Pipelines Crossing Brazos River Upstream from Facility.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20003G6731981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony on Behalf of Util on Doherty Contention 7 Re LPCI Cold Slug.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19345H1121981-04-20020 April 1981 Testimony Supporting Doherty Contention 3 on Inadequacy of Design Safety Limit of Applicant Fuel Rods.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003B2381981-02-0606 February 1981 Errata Sheet for L Perl Testimony,Page 12,Line 13 & Table 9. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003A2101981-01-27027 January 1981 Errata Sheet to s Michaelson Testimony.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19343B8481980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Bishop Contention 1 Concerning Population Projections ML19340D1401980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony Re Tx Pirg Contention 1(f) Re Population Risks. Pp 1-8 ML19343B8451980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8491980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Site.Tera Corp Coastal Site Comparison Rept, Encl ML19343B8391980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 5 Concerning Solid Waste Combustion ML19343B8471980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Concerning South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek 1. Analysis of Prime Farmland Soils Encl ML19343B8461980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Hinderstein Contention 5 Concerning Coastal Sites ML19343B8441980-12-18018 December 1980 Testimony on Behalf of Util Re Tx Pirg Contention 1 Re South Texas Project 3 Versus Allens Creek Site.Listing of Cost Savings Encl 1982-03-26
[Table view] |
Text
@
po , t'j,(
C V*~ l/ q
.J F 'ff b gr f3 h <)g\i Doc:'ETED '
rro f0/
H UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - ~
- m 0.6 6gpn 59 ; NUCLEAR RFiULATORY COMMISSION - JUL 301981 > Z
,po 6. - Office cf the Secretary /
DdM 4 "I $[ FORE 0$HE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD .,
Service i y' O g In/,theJatter o f X
~? ! .
y N m HOUSTCN LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY X Docket No. 50-466 X
(Allens Creek Nuclear , Unit 1) X TEX PIRG' S SUPPLEM. NTAL DIRECT 'llRITTEN TESTIMONY OF DR. MARRACK At the bednning of this hearing it was agreed that the intcrvenors would not present their testimony until both the applicant, H L f. P, and the NRC Staff had presented all of their witnesces and closed their case. iiowever to help with a schedunc problem the Board ruled that Dr. Marrack would have to testify on Tex PIRG contentions 2 and 4 before Dr. Frank S. Sanders was finished with his testimony. See page 4356 of record. Dr Marrack testified between pages 4365 a_.2 4699 then Dr. Sanders testified between pages 4701 and 5083 after Dr. Marrack. The following testimony of Dr. Marrack will address only those issues addressed by Dr Sanders between pages 4701 and 5083.
TESTIMONY A viable fishery is one which is self custaining. If it needs replenishing with fish, it is not viablel A company like Lockheed or Chrysler which gets special government support to bail it out from a financial bankrupcy is not really " viable". Both Dr Sanders and the Texas Parks and 'llildlife Department both admit that for a custained desirable sport fishcry,the Allens Creek Lake will be dependant on regular 1<, stocking of fish. The applicant is apparently relying on the State of Texas to do this restocking for them. How-ever no evidence of a contractual agreement with Texas P ks and T)SO3 1 5 8108070043 810730 PDR ADOCK 05000466 T PDR
<1 *.
Wildlifeito do this restocking for the applicant has been -
presented into the record. No commitment to another source of fich has been offered into evidence, nor has an binding commitment by the applicant been made to regularly provide, during the life of the plant, adequate funds to buy fish for lake stocking as part. of a replenishment program. In fact, neither a criteria or plan for restocking has been presented in the FES, FSFES or elsewhere. Without stocking and 2 . gular restocking with sport fish, the Allens Creek Lake will not be one in which fishermen can catch enough fish to interect them and the1r fishermen friends in returning , i,e. it will not be a viable fishing lake for fishermen or for fish.
It is my opinion that thc fish available to be caught must i
- be free of poisions and toxic chemicals which might reasonably be i expected to impair human hea even when eaten in large quantities
- on a long-term basis. In the _1 ens Creek Lake, the potential for significant mercury concentrations to build up in the tissues of l sport fish is the real risk to the public th;t this board must l
recognise. Because of the probable build-up of mercury concentrat-ions as inorganic or organic compounds, in the tiscues of the sport fish in the Allens Creek Lake ( the mercury coming from their food chain the sport fish caught can be reasonably expected not to be suitable for human consumption.
The Allens Creek Lake is poorly designed to support the growth of fish e$en if they are ._
born,by is likely u Gidi/ ~
(because of the very limited spawning areas. Most game fish desire spawn in shallow, less :than 4 feet, water with a firm base. Allens 2
...--,*y, ,- , - , m._,m .e,.,m,~,m_,_ -,-- ...--_,.,y--
-- , . , , . _ - . - - ._w ._-y.--..-.,, , , , _ -,% -~_.--,,.p..n y, - ,,c,- y, ,,,e , _ , p. -.
,; . ==
Creek as proposed has very little such spawning area.: The most desireable spawning area is the Allens Creek inlet, but it will be an area of heavy siltation and disturbed by the public activities at the proposed public park such that even that area will be degrad-ed as a spawning area.
Further even if somehow game fish are in the lake, there is a real doubt as to whether there will be enough shad and other smaller fish to supply the dietary needs of the sport fish. First the shad also require shallow water to spawn and it is almost absent.
Securdly, the food base needed to support the shad is impaired by several factors. The heavy cediment content of the Allens Creek Lake will restrict the depth that the sunlight can reach to a very prLL J;& _
- few feet so thatflower forms of plant life _
will be limited to much less than the total volume of the lake. The passing of the lake water and its lower forms of plant and animal life 'through the plant cooling system will kill a significant percentage of
- the total lake's productive capacity because it will be exposed to the high temperatures, rapid change of temperatures , and the .
chlorine which is designed to kill them. These factors so caucr j many of the shad fry to fail to survivo, grow, and reproduce. It is l
i likely that the above factors will prevent the custained yield l
l of shad in sufficient numbers to support a viable sports fishery in the Allons Crock Lake. The data in the FES and the FSFES fail to adequately address this issue.
The role of the fexas Parks and Wildlife Department in .the .
l operation of the Allons Creek Lake and Park has not been clearly l
I defined. It is especially significant that the Texas Parks and i Wildlife has not appeared in this proceeding. Howhere in the 3.
i
--m.,_,_._ ,_..._ -, _.__ ,_ _ _ - _. , .. ... . . --- , , . . - - - - ,
'. n .
record is there any indication from the Texas Parks and Wildlife that the Allens Creek Lake will be a viable fishery or'that'they will do anything in an attempt to make it so. No contract between the applicant and the Texas Parks and Wildlife has been introduced into evidence,otc M cbe** d 6 indicate that My will take the necessary actions to make Allens Creek a viable fishery. If the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department was interested, even a little, I
in making the Allens Creek Project into a park or fishing lake they would have presented witnesses and cross-examination with j the purpose.of showing the Board the quality of such a ' fishery.
Instead, neither the Texas Parks and Wildlife nor the State of i Texas have even seen fit to even participate occasionally in this issue. The State of Texas has not even c? aimed that it will stock the lake, much less maintain it to provide good fishing. Further and most significantly, there has been no showing that the State l
of Texas even has statutory authority to spend any money en the Allens Creek Lake. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Code does not allow the use of its funds for this purpose except for the,
" Expansion and development of additional opportunities of hunting and fishing in state-owned land or water." Section 11.033(10).
Neither the Allens Creek Park nor Lake are to be owned by the state, but will be owned by the applicant. Further, State waters must be open to the public. Clearly the exclusion area can not be l
open to the public, and this applicant has already closed off public access to both its Cedar Bayou and Parish lakes which wero once open to the public.
l 4.
. . a Dr. Sanders discussed a decay constant,k value, for L'o tal residual chlorine, TRC. However, this is misleading because there is no single chemical called "TRC". Instead it is a group of chlorinated organic compounds created by adding chlorine to water containing organic compounds. The TRC's are formed by reactions of chlorine and chlorine derivatives with those organics in the water. TRC is also known as " bound available chlorine" to distinguish them from free chlorine. These two forms of chlorine are the major components involved in sterilizing bacteria 11y >
contaminated water by chlorination. The compounds derived cLWsu from/H~epend in part on the nature and amounts of those organics in the water and the amounts of chlorine that is available.
TRCs are only those particular compounds formed which chemically react in the detection react $n under standardized conditions to cause color production. Color production is the end point of this assay as performed in water testing. Each of the variety of chemic-als grouped as "TRC" has its own specific decay constant. The decay constant observed in a particular sample of water such as -
Allens Creek Lake will depend on the specifics of circumstances at the time of chlorination, such as the concentrations of ph organic present. As currently performed the TRC decay constant 21s a composite value that does not indicate th5 decay constants of its component parts, Thuc a tard-toxic TRC component may have a very long decay constant (in terms of time not inverse time) and still not be detected in the composite decay constant.
Another major problem with the described composite TRC is that not all chlorinated organic compounds that are toxic to 5.
- - . , . , , - - - y- - .- -- .- - m_,y- ,- ,---. .___eyv-= e---- .,- ,- rr+-.- ,- = e . -
i 1
aquatic life even react in the TRC detecticit tect. Thuc they are not detected at ell by the TRC tect. Some of these undetec.ted 1
compoundc in addition to being toxic to aquatic organisms are also mutagenic and aucpected carcinogens. Trihalacethonec is one class i
from thic group of compounds . They have caused concern in public health circles because they can, and do, occur in domectic water cuppliec and they have a clnw decay constant, It ic the chemicals in the clacc of "non-TRC readive compounds" which have to be concidered in addition in acceccing the biological effecto of chlorine additions to the pro v oced illena Creek Lake.
Their combined toxic effects are not concidered in the FES, FSFES, or elconhere in the record by applicant or staff. They have long-term toxicities at concentrations below those accepted for TRC,and can reaconably be expected to have a cignificant impact on the aquatic life of Allena Creek with its high temperatures. The high temperatures ucually increase the adverse impacts of toxic chemicals on aquatic organicmc. The biological effect of the non-TRC reactive
~
compoundc in above and beyond that of the effects cauced by the compoundo meacured by the TRC reactive tests.
~
6.
- =w t
- The calculations for nutrients, derived from the sewage of the communities of Wallis and Sealy,which will reach Allens Creek Cooling Lake because these communities' treatment plants discharge into Allens Creek do not reflect reasonable projections for nutrient load from sewage because they are based on current community populations J GGut Swd. uK
[withodt the percentage-wise large increases in population in the area occurring during construction of the proposed Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station from the migration of people into the area to support the construction workers and their families.
The large influx of workers to build the plant will create an additional demand for services above that now available. It is the usual pattern for the needed additional services to be provided by migration of persons into those affected communities. Their excreta will increase the load of nutrients entering Allens Creek Cooling Lake.
In addition to sudden population growth in the two communities -
generated by a need for worker support services, a long term growth in population above the historic growth rate prediction can reasonabs be expected because new industries will move in to the area to be near the proposed ACQNS. Such industries wil'1 be ones particularly influenced in their citing by the presence of a nuclear electrical generating plant. This influx of population associated with these
'~ new power plant-specific-industries was not considered in the popu-lation projections for the communities of Wallis and Sealy and thus their additional contributions to Allens Creek Lake nutrient load is not part of the nutrient loads projected, LS$u yyihC
, For these reasons, thejn)utri'ent loads from sewage from the two small communities is significantly low.
u .
It has been a fact of historic record in this area that when communities grow rapidly for whatever reason, their sewage treatment facilities lag so far behind their growth in population that the treatment plants are grossly overloaded, and-inadequately treated sewage is discharged.
There has b'een no evidence presented that this historic sequence will not be repeated *.n the communities of Wallis and Sealy. The probable discharge of inadequately treated sewage into Allens Creek Lake with concommitant health risks in a recreational water should be part of the Board's consideration of this matter.
The proposed area designated for water sports and swimming may very well be undesirable because of inadequately treated sewage as addressed above (4720///) and unattractive because of exotic weed growth and algal blooms. No roped-off, or otherwise pr)tected, swimming area has been described. Other cooling plant lakes in the ,
area have developed unattractive blue-green algal blooms. Ir_ a Gulf Coast area freshwater cooling lake, such blooms are primarily triggered by water temperature (Dr. Welch - Rice University) rather than by nutrient loading as reported for lakes further north.
Hydrilla and Water hyacinth mats become a fact of life in freshwater recreational lakes of the area after a few years of use.
Algal blooms, Hydrilla and Water hyacinth, none of which are easy to prevent or control, severely reduce the recreational potential of and esthetic impact of freshwater lakes. It is highly probable that these adverse developments will occur in the proposed Allens Creek Lake,with its high water temperature characteristic. The l
potential seriousness of algal blooms was in part recognized by the O
NRC Staff and referred to in SFEIS 4.3.2.4.
As shown in response to Dr. Saunders' remarks (4708/1) on viability of Allens Creek Lake sportfishing, there is a signifi-cant toxicity from chlorination and the products derived from chlorination of water-containing organic compounds. The toxicity of chlorination is increased by raised water temperatures. This was addressed in my direct testimony and supporting references given for this general biological phenomena.
This project's cooling lake will have at times particularly high temperatures near the lethal temperature for adult fish. Larval and juvenile forms of fish are significantly more susceptible to the adverse effects of both raised water temperatures above the optimum for the species and to toxic chemicals.
At least _
two classes of toxic chemicals are involved in this proposed lakes Chlorine & Chlorinated compounds and heavy metals. The effects of the three adverse factors are synergistic and, as pointed out in the cited literature, their combined effects cannot be predicted from summing the effect of each toxic factor taken separately.
The effects are significantly more severe when the adverse factors operate conjointly. Algal blooms may be an additional adverse factor.
Further, these effects occour directly not only on the sport-fish but probably more importantly on the infrastructure, the species of the food chain,which feed them.
9
l The productioncapacity of the projected lake at 200 lb.
fish / acre is dependent on multiple factors including the rate of sportfish stocking and stock replenishment which is not known, and the capacity of the food chain to support and provide for rapid growth of the fish used in stock replenishment.
The capacity fo the food chain can reasonably be expected to be restricted by the adverse aquatic factors addressed above in response to Dr. Saunders' ret.rks (4732/23).
These are the synergistic toxic effects of high water temperature, heavy metals and chlorine &
chlorination products and probable algal blooms.
Because of probable inadequate food supplies, the real production
! capacity of this proposed Allens Creek Lake will de 'Well below the 200 lb/ acre given. It is possible to have a massive stock replenish-ment program in which fish input exceeds die off rate and fish malnutrition so that the 200 lb./ acre figure is reached. However, this situation could not be described as a " viable" sport fishery! -
l l
l
! The' assessment that 3% of the Chlorine added to the power plant cooling water will become organically bound chlorine is not sustainable because the necessary facts to make the determination are not known.
Amongst the important unknowns are the concentration of ammonium ion in the lake water; the individual chemicals that make up the organic chemicals in the water since each chemical will react with chlorine at its own specific rate for a given temperature; the concentration of each of the above organic chemicals and the catalytic effects,
, if any,from metal ions and other chemicals in the water.
10
]
- m In the absence of such basic data. prediction of % of chlorine being organically bound is inappropriate.
A plant shutdown, when it is the only plant warming a lake's water in winter, coinciding with a cold " norther" in a shallow body of water with a fairly uniform depth such as the proposed Allens Creek Lake can result in water cooling to the extent that cold effects on fish occour, including death from cold and/or subsequent infections in weakened fish.
Water in this lake may under an adverse combination of W c' eb't:J's 92ft.'*E T"
Bot the rate of cooling and the actual temperature circumstances (,
affect aquatic organisms. In fish, these effects are more pronounced for those acclimatized to unusually high temperatures for the species. This will be the case for the fish in Allens Creek Lake. Shad and Gizzard are particularly sensitive to cold and die before the water freezes. .
It is not clear whether the rough to game fish ratios given by Dr. Saunders refer to fish in natural lakes or in 11k's where the sportfish population is dependent on stockito 1 -le-J shments.
When stocking maintains the sportfish population in a buly of water, the rate of sportfish restocking is an important factor in determining the rough ta sportfish ratio. This restocking rate is not known for this hypothetical Allens Creek Lake so no figure for the ratio can be given.
11
Whilst the applicant now has a valid NPDES, it will have expired by the time any discharges from the proposed lake occour. Permit renewal is not automatic.
Cadmium concentration in the Brazos River water used for Allens Creek Lake are projected as being 12 ppb. The long term potential toxic effect of this metal on fish depends on the coexistent Magnesium and ' Calcium concentrations. The lower these two metals' concentration is, the more toxic to fish this cadmium will become.
The limited studies of mercury on fish biology show that with short term exrnaure sublethat effects can be observed at water con-centrations of mercury salts at 0.05 ppm mercury. Effects observed include reduction of feeding and mobility reduction. Of particular ,
significance is the effect of mercury on susceptibllity to pre-dation. It has been shown that largemouth bass are more mercury . [
contaminated fish than uncontaminated control fish. (Kania and O' Hara, _1474). The significance of this in enhancing accumulation of mercury,in.the bass and the humans that eat them is obvious and important. Elimination of mercury from fish is slow because it is bound in the tissues of the fish. The half Ilfe for methyl-mercury retention was estimated at greater than 200 days (Giblin and Massaro,1973).
The EPA maximum concentration for mercur in recreational a >*0
- fresh waters is(0.05 micrc> ram mercury /literf, Exhibit LFT-14 by 12
~
. . ==
the applicants witness claims that his calculations shows this Allens Creek cooling take water will contain 0.1 to 0.09 micro-grams mercury / liter te, twice the EPA standard for this toxic metal (page 4444,1Lne 14 of record). The standard of 0.05 micrograms mercury / liter is about twice the level of mercury concentration readily measured with precision by current instrumentation. The data accepted by Dames and Moore, the Applicant, and the NRC Staf f a.X and presented withjcomment in table S 2.6 as representing the observed mercury concentrations in the Brazos River water shows that at l ea s t ,10 of the 12 3razon River water seTples analysed and possibly all 12, exceeded the recommended EPA standard for such waters. This water from the Brazos River will f orm the bulk of the water in the Al lens Creek Lake. With the mercury concentration factors observed in f ood chains of sport fish exceeding 1,000x and ranging up to 10.000x , fish from the Allens Creek Lake must be expected to have mercury concentrations in their meer exceeding the recommended limit for human consumption of 0.5 mitigram/ kilogram of fish consumed.
Thus mercury in the fish caught in the proposed Allens Creek Lake must be expected to be a health hazard to those who consume the fish,especially children. It is my experience that fish'ermen l and their friends consume a considerable portion of the fish they i
catch. This is expected to be increasingly the case as food prices l
rise, Algal blooms must be expected at Allens Creek Lake from late April or May until early Autumn, and will not be Ilmited to late summer as implied by Dr. Sanders. Further these algal blooms will
- be from blue-green algne es shown by the experience at Lewis Creek
. cooling lake.
13 w - --..-g-- - , . - . - . - - , - - - - - y .,w- ,--w -.m,,..---,w., .w*-r- -- y- -- -.
m .
Dr Sanders has recognised that the optimtm spawning depth for crappie is three feet. *11th the steep sides around al nost all of Allens Creek, there vill be or.1v n verv norreu band around the r
proposed inke that nrovid es foi; .-+s p/wni n;, it is very doubtf ul that such a limited narrop Snnd for sorwning util nrovide a sustained yictd of Crnnnin especially if there was actuntly henvv sport fishing for thi s sneclee, B e Texas PnrNs vnd 'Jildlif e has said that it will nnt stock Allens Cree 9 with Crappie. It is unlikely that make-un wrter from the 3rezos River will p- <b sufficient nu'5ers of Crnppie to stock the lake beenuse the Cranpie are rare , l' existent, niong this stretch of the 3rnz.as River.
- n i' y
... . l(
,'];
jamd cAforgan %lf j. ' -
% J3935 Deymount c% gat lan.f 9exas 77473 l
14, l
.