ML061860712

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:38, 23 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Email from G. Seeman (NPPD) to D. Loveless (Riv), Subject: Service Water Modeling
ML061860712
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/03/2004
From: Seeman G
Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
To: David Loveless
NRC Region 4
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0007
Download: ML061860712 (1)


Text

David Loveless- RE: Service Water Modeling Page


From - - -.. Seembff ii A. <gaseemannppd.com>

To: "David Loveless" <DPL@nrc.gov> -6ZY Date: 3/3/04 4:31PM

Subject:

RE: Service Water Modeling Dave, It sounds like the simplified drawing is from the IPE. There has been a modification to the SW System and

___--isolation is by 36 and 37.as -stated.. -will get this informationtoyou-as soon as l-an..

Glen


Original Message -----

From: David Loveless [1]

Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 2:21 PM To: Seeman, Glen A.

Cc: Sutton, Kent E.

Subject:

Service Water Modeling Glen, It is my understanding that should normal service water need to be isolated from the Class portion of the Divisions, it is done by closing MOVs 36 and 37, thus separating the Divisions also. For some reason, the simplified drawing that was provided to INEEL showed the isolation by an MOV-1 17 on the nonclass portion of the piping. Could you verify which is correct?

Additionally, I need to know the nonclass isolation signals and what the system success criteria would be if the nonclass piping did not isolate as designed.

Thanks for your assistance and patience as we update our model. I believe that it will be in all our best interests to have a valid SPAR.

Thanks, David y-/0