Letter Sequence Supplement |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0622301982006-08-0909 August 2006 Draft Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request to Increase Surveillance Testing Interval for Intermediate Range Monitor Project stage: Draft RAI ML0629704462006-10-17017 October 2006 Supplemental Information in Support of a Proposed License Amendment Request to Revise the Intermediate Range Monitoring Instrumentation, Mode 5, Channel Functional Test Surveillance Frequency from 7 Days to 31 Days Project stage: Supplement ML0704702632007-02-0808 February 2007 Supplemental Information in Support of a Proposed License Amendment Request to Revise the Intermediate Range Monitoring Instrumentation, Mode 5, Channel Functional Test Surveillance Frequency from 7 Days to 31 Days Project stage: Supplement ML0712102912007-04-27027 April 2007 Technical Specifications, Issuance of Amendment Revise TS to Change the Frequency of the Mode 5 Intermediate Range Monitoring Instrumentation Channel Functional Test Project stage: Approval ML0705804922007-04-27027 April 2007 License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment Revise TS to Change the Frequency of the Mode 5 Intermediate Range Monitoring Instrumentation Channel Functional Test Project stage: Approval 2006-08-09
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Perry |
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARIR 05000440/20230042024-01-30030 January 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000440/2023004 L-23-207, License Amendment Request (LAR) for Adoption of TSTF-264-A Revision 0, 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 - Delete Flux Monitors Specific Overlap Requirement SRs2024-01-24024 January 2024 License Amendment Request (LAR) for Adoption of TSTF-264-A Revision 0, 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 - Delete Flux Monitors Specific Overlap Requirement SRs L-24-017, 30-Day Voluntary Report in Accordance with Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative2024-01-24024 January 2024 30-Day Voluntary Report in Accordance with Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative IR 05000440/20234022024-01-10010 January 2024 Cyber Security Inspection Report 05000440/2023402 ML24003A8032024-01-0303 January 2024 Notification of NRC Fire Protection Team Inspection Request for Information ML23321A0472023-12-20020 December 2023 Letter to Rod L. Penfield - Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 - License Renewal Regulatory Audit Regarding the Environmental Review of the License Renewal Application L-23-171, CFR 50.55a Request Number VR-9. Revision 0, Feedwater Check Valve Exercising Test Frequency2023-12-0808 December 2023 CFR 50.55a Request Number VR-9. Revision 0, Feedwater Check Valve Exercising Test Frequency L-23-244, Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-12-0606 December 2023 Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation IR 05000440/20230112023-11-28028 November 2023 Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection Report 05000440/2023011 IR 05000440/20234032023-11-27027 November 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000440/2023403 ML23292A2972023-11-17017 November 2023 Table of Contents LAR (L-2023-LLA-0111) L-23-238, Mid-Cycle Revision to the Core Operating Limits Report for Operating Cycle 202023-11-10010 November 2023 Mid-Cycle Revision to the Core Operating Limits Report for Operating Cycle 20 L-23-052, Submittal of the Updated Safety Analysis Report, Revision 232023-10-27027 October 2023 Submittal of the Updated Safety Analysis Report, Revision 23 ML23292A2482023-10-19019 October 2023 Fws to NRC, Federal Agency Coordination Under ESA Section 7 for Perry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, License Renewal, and Concurrence with Not Likely to Adversely Affect Determination for Northern Long-eared Bat ML23292A2472023-10-19019 October 2023 Fws to NRC, Perry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, License Renewal List of Threatened and Endangered Species That May Occur in Your Proposed Project Location or May Be Affected IR 05000440/20230032023-10-11011 October 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000440/2023003 ML23249A1032023-10-0303 October 2023 Letter to Rod L. Penfield, Site Vice President-Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1-Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML23237B4222023-09-28028 September 2023 Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp. - Vistra Operations Company LLC - Letter Regarding Order Approving Transfer of Licenses and Draft Conforming License Amendments ML23269A1242023-09-27027 September 2023 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure ML23261C3642023-09-25025 September 2023 License Renewal Application Online Reference Portal ML23261B0192023-09-25025 September 2023 Aging Management Audit Plan Regarding the License Renewal Application Review ML23256A3592023-09-22022 September 2023 Determination of Acceptability and Sufficiency for Docketing, Proposed Review Schedule, and Opportunity for a Hearing Regarding the Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp. Application for License Renewal L-23-205, Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments2023-09-12012 September 2023 Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments L-23-206, Ohio National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit 3IB00016 MD2023-09-12012 September 2023 Ohio National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit 3IB00016 MD L-23-172, Quality Assurance Program Manual2023-08-31031 August 2023 Quality Assurance Program Manual IR 05000440/20234012023-08-28028 August 2023 Public - Perry Nuclear Power Plant Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000440/2023401 ML23129A1722023-08-25025 August 2023 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2; Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; and Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 IR 05000440/20230052023-08-24024 August 2023 Updated Inspection Plan for Perry Nuclear Power Plant (Report 05000440/2023005) ML23172A2852023-08-23023 August 2023 Safety Evaluation Irradiated Fuel Management Plan and Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate ML23227A2202023-08-15015 August 2023 Information Request to Support Upcoming Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection at Perry Nuclear Power Plant L-23-188, Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp., Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments2023-08-0707 August 2023 Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp., Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments L-23-001, License Amendment Request to Remove the Table of Contents from the Technical Specifications2023-08-0707 August 2023 License Amendment Request to Remove the Table of Contents from the Technical Specifications IR 05000440/20230022023-08-0202 August 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000440/2023002 L-23-174, 30-Day Voluntary Report in Accordance with Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative2023-07-19019 July 2023 30-Day Voluntary Report in Accordance with Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative ML23198A2842023-07-17017 July 2023 Information Request for the Cyber-Security Baseline Inspection, Notification to Perform Inspection L-23-146, License Renewal Application for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant2023-07-0303 July 2023 License Renewal Application for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant IR 05000440/20230102023-06-29029 June 2023 Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection Report 05000440/2023010 ML23178A2422023-06-28028 June 2023 Reassignment of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Chief in the Division of Operating Reactor Licensing for Plant Licensing Branch III L-23-050, 2022 Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report of Changes to or Errors in Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Models2023-06-22022 June 2023 2022 Annual 10 CFR 50.46 Report of Changes to or Errors in Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Models L-23-051, Plan, Nineteenth Inservice Inspection Summary Report2023-06-22022 June 2023 Plan, Nineteenth Inservice Inspection Summary Report L-22-249, License Amendment Request for Adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler TSTF-276-A Revision 2, Change TS 3.8.1. AC Sources-Operating. to Clarify the Power Factor Requirements When Performing Diesel Gener2023-06-0505 June 2023 License Amendment Request for Adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler TSTF-276-A Revision 2, Change TS 3.8.1. AC Sources-Operating. to Clarify the Power Factor Requirements When Performing Diesel Gener ML23144A3562023-05-25025 May 2023 Information Meeting with a Question and Answer Session to Discuss NRC 2022 End of Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 L-23-134, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-05-23023 May 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations L-23-065, Annual Financial Report2023-05-22022 May 2023 Annual Financial Report ML23124A1742023-05-17017 May 2023 Energy Harbor Fleet Vistra License Transfer - Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Commance Peak Plant, Units 1 & 2, Beaver Valley Station, Units 1 & 2, Davis Besse Station, Unit 1 and Perry Plant, Unit 1 ML23129A0112023-05-16016 May 2023 Notice of Consideration of Approval of Indirect and Direct License Transfer for Comanche Peak Plant, Units 1 & 2, Beaver Valley Station, Units 1 & 2, Davis Besse Station, Unit 1 and Perry Plant, Unit 1 (EPID L-2023-LLM-0000) (Letter) IR 05000440/20230012023-05-0404 May 2023 Integrated Inspection Report (05000440/2023001) L-23-122, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2023-04-26026 April 2023 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report L-23-121, Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report2023-04-26026 April 2023 Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report 2024-01-30
[Table view] |
Text
FENOC PerryNuclear Power Station 10 Center Road Perry, Ohio 44081 FirstEnergyNuclear OperatingCompany L. William Pearce 440-280-5382 Vice President Fax. 440-280-8029 October 17, 2006 PY-CEI/NRR-2985L 10 CFR 50.90 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-440 Supplemental Information in Support of a Proposed License Amendment Request to Revise the Intermediate Range Monitoring Instrumentation, Mode 5, CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST Surveillance Frequency from 7 Days to 31 Days (TAC NO. MD0144)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter provides supplemental information requested by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on August 4, 2006 pertaining to the Perry Nuclear Power Plant License Amendment Request (LAR) submitted on February 14, 2006 (PY-CEI/NRR-2906L). The LAR would modify Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.1.1 to extend the Intermediate Range Monitoring Instrumentation, Mode 5, CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST Surveillance Frequency from,7*Days to 31 Days.
There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter or its attachment.
If there are any questions or .if additional information is required, please contact Mr. Gregory A. Dunn, Manager - FENOC Fleet Licensing, at (330) 315-7243.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 17, 2006.
Attachment:
- 1. Supplemental. Information cc:: -..
NRC Project Manager ...
NRC Resident Inspector
.:"NRC RegionIll-St'ate.o1FOhio
Attachment 1 PY-CEI/NRR-2985L Page 1 of 3 Supplemental Information On August 4, 2006, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), by electronic mail, requested supplemental information relative to a Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) License Amendment Request (LAR) submitted on February 14, 2006 (PY-CEI/NRR-2906L). The LAR proposes to modify Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.1.1 by extending the Intermediate Range Monitoring Instrumentation, Mode 5, CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST Surveillance Frequency from 7 Days to 31 Days. This submittal provides the requested supplemental information.
- 1. NRC Request:
Page 5, of Enclosure 1, under Updated Safety Analysis Report, states that the surveillance requirement for Mode 2 has not been revised and therefore that function would be assured. However, the NRC staff is concerned that changes in Mode 5 surveillance requirement may also impact on the operability of the function in Mode 2.
Explain the basis for your rationale.
- 1. Response:
The Mode 2 Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.3.1.1.4, CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST (7 day performance frequency), is required to be performed or verified current prior to entering Mode 2 (during a plant startup) or within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> of entering Mode 2 (during a plant shutdown). SR 3.0.1 states that SRs have to be met during the Modes or other specified conditions listed in the Applicability of a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO). SR 3.0.4 states that entry into a Mode or other specified condition in the Applicability of an LCO shall occur only when the LCO's surveillances have been met within their specified frequency. These two Technical Specification requirements ensure the Mode 2 CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST (SR 3.3.1.1.4) is performed or verified current prior to entering Mode 2 (during a plant startup) or within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> of entering Mode 2 (during a plant shutdown), and during the period the plant is in Mode 2. Performance of the Mode 2 CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST (7 day performance frequency) ensures IRM channel operability during plant shutdowns and startups, and during operations while in Mode 2.
The PNPP surveillance instruction used for the IRM CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST is applicable to either the Mode 2 or Mode 5 surveillance requirement. The proposed license amendment would only change the performance frequency for the Mode 5 surveillance requirement from every 7 days to every 31 days. The Mode 2 CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST performance frequency will not be altered by the proposed amendment and will remain at a frequency of every 7 days.
No changes are being proposed to either the operability requirements or surveillance frequencies for Mode 2 SRs.
Attachment 1 PY-CEI/NRR-2985L Page 2 of 3
- 2. NRC Request:
Page 7, Enclosure 1, second paragraph, This paragraph identifies many failures of the affected component of IRM function. Explain how these failures were discovered; during test or in between test.
- 3. NRC Request:
Page 7, Enclosure 1, second paragraph, This paragraph identifies multiple failures of S4 switch. However, it does not state the total number of failures and the effect of these failures such as could it have prevented the IRM trip.
- 2. and 3. Response:
Since Items 2 and 3 request similar information a single response is being provided.
LAR (PY-CEI/NRR-2906L) stated that the component which had the largest number of repeat failures was the IRM INOP Inhibit Switch (S4). Thirteen (13) failures have been identified. Records indicate that ten (10) of the failures were identified during the performance of instrument testing. The remaining records did not contain enough data to indicate how the failures were identified; however, switch S4 is a pushbutton switch which is only manipulated during IRM channel testing when the channel is in an-inoperable configuration. Since the switch is not in the circuit when the IRM channel is in its operational configuration, switch failure does not impact channel operability.
The LAR also stated that there was a failure of a trip unit and a failure of a relay. With respect to the trip unit, records indicated the failure was identified during system operations in between the surveillance tests. Failure of this component only impacted indicating lights and would not cause the IRM channel to be inoperable. Failure of the relay was identified during the performance of IRM channel functional testing. Failure of this component caused the channel to be inoperable.
In addition to the component failures listed in the preceding paragraphs, though not described in the LAR, the maintenance history included 21 component failures which impacted channel operability. Examples include: optical isolator failures, which prevented the proper indication on channel recorders; range switch card failures, which prevented ranging the channel output reading; and motor module failures, which prohibited the motion of the detector into or out of the reactor vessel. However, no adverse trends in component or channel reliability were noted.
Seven (7) of the component failures were identified during the performance of channel functional testing; however, several could also have been identified by other means, such as observation of improper channel operation. Examples include the inability to drive detectors in/out of the reactor vessel and detector failure. Since channel inoperability can be determined through observation of improper channel operation or by the performance of other testing, the performance of channel functional testing does not appear to be a major factor in the identification of component failures that could impact channel operability.
Attachment 1 PY-CEI/NRR-2985L Page 3 of 3 Therefore, the performance frequency of the channel functional testing should have a minimal effect upon identification of component failures which could impact channel operability.
Given the number of components that comprise each of eight (8) individual IRM channels, the number of component failures identified in the 17-year review period is considered to be small. Therefore, it can be concluded from the maintenance history that the IRM channel components are reliable.