12-15-2006 | with both trains of the auxiliary feedwater ( AFW) system were not aligned as required for automatic system actuation. In the as-found control switch configuration, an auxiliary feedwater actuation signal (AFAS) would not have automatically actuated AFW system components. Investigation determined that the control switches had been positioned in the noted alignment two days prior, with the plant in Mode 3.
At the time of discovery, and throughout the period during which the switches were not aligned for automatic actuation, one train of AFW was in operation providing the heat removal function.
However, in the event of a postulated AFAS and loss of off-site power event, the motor-driven AFW pump in the operating train would not have been automatically re-powered by the associated emergency diesel generator as it re-energized loads.
This occurrence is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as a condition prohibited by Technical Specifications. In addition, the occurrence is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B) and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii)(B) as a condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of a system that is needed to remove residual heat. |
---|
FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (6 PAGE (3) Palisades Nuclear Plant 05000-255 2006 — 007 — 00
EVENT DESCRIPTION
On November 3, 2006, with the plant in Mode 2, it was discovered that control switches [HS;BA] associated with both trains of the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) [BA] system were not aligned as required for automatic system actuation. In the as-found control switch configuration, an auxiliary feedwater actuation signal (AFAS) would not have automatically actuated AFW system components.
Investigation determined that the control switches had been positioned in the noted alignment two days prior, with the plant in Mode 3.
At the time of discovery, and throughout the period during which the switches were not aligned for automatic actuation, one train of AFW was in operation providing the heat removal function.
However, in the event of a postulated AFAS and loss of off-site power event, the motor-driven AFW pump [P;BA] in the operating train would not have been automatically re-powered by the associated emergency diesel generator [DG;EK] as it re-energized loads.
By design, the AFW system automatically supplies feedwater to the steam generators [SG;AB] to remove decay heat from the primary coolant system [AB]. The AFW system actuates automatically on low steam generator level by an AFAS. The AFAS initiates signals for starting the AFW pumps and repositioning system valves to initiate AFW flow to the steam generators.
Technical Specification (TS) Limiting Condition For Operation (LCO) 3.7.5 requires two AFW trains to be operable in Modes 1, 2 and 3. The implications of the subject condition on the AFW system are that both AFW trains are rendered inoperable, and considering a loss of off-site power, there would have been less than 100% of the required AFW flow available automatically to the steam generators.
Failure to recognize the TS implications of the switch alignment resulted in not meeting the required action and completion time associated with TS LCO 3.7.5.B.2, to be in Mode 4 within 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />, and TS LCO 3.7.5.C.1, to immediately initiate action to restore one AFW train to operable status. In addition, the transition from Mode 3 to Mode 2 did not meet TS LCO 3.0.4, since the associated actions when TS LCO 3.7.5 is not met do not permit continued operation for an unlimited period of time.
This occurrence is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as a condition prohibited by Technical Specifications. In addition, the occurrence is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B) and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii)(B) as a condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of a system that is needed to remove residual heat.
FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (6 PAGE (3) Palisades Nuclear Plant 05000-255 2006 -- 007 — 00
CAUSE OF THE EVENT
A root cause evaluation was conducted for the occurrence. The evaluation identified the following root causes: 1) the control switches were improperly positioned due to operators applying the wrong mental model in the operation, identification, and operability of the AFW controls, 2) an inadequate standard exists for the conduct of control panel walkdowns, as evidenced by the number of personnel who had an opportunity to identify the incorrect switch positions, but failed to do so, 3) procedures for normal plant shutdown are inadequate due to the need to use multiple procedures simultaneously and there being no procedure to direct the transition from main feedwater (MFW) [SJ] to AFW.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Following discovery, the switches were placed in the proper position for automatic actuation of AFW.
A check of other safety related controls on the control room panels was conducted to verify proper alignment.
A case study of the event will be developed and implemented to stress the lessons learned from the occurrence and to reinforce operations standards associated with prevention and detection of operating events.
A revised control panel walkdown standard will be developed and implemented to incorporate industry best practices.
Procedures will be revised to clarify AFW operability requirements during plant shutdowns, add guidance for system alignment checks prior to Mode changes, and to provide additional guidance on transitioning from MFW to AFW.
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE
This occurrence was determined to be of very low safety significance. Conditional core damage probability (CCDP) was conservatively estimated to be less than 1E-06.
Although AFW was not aligned for automatic actuation upon receipt of an AFAS, operators would have been directed by procedures to recover steam generator level, and could have readily started an AFW pump manually from the control room via its pump hand switch.
PREVIOUS SIMILAR EVENTS
None
|
---|
|
|
| | Reporting criterion |
---|
05000305/LER-2006-010 | | | 05000456/LER-2006-001 | Unit 1 Reactor Coolant System Pressure Boundary Leakage Due To Inter-Granular Stress Corrosion Cracking of a Pressurizer Heater Sleeve | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded | 05000454/LER-2006-001 | Technical Specification Required Action Completion Time Exceeded for Inoperable Containment Isolation Valves Due to Untimely Operability Determination | | 05000423/LER-2006-001 | Loss Of Safety Function Of The Control Room Emergency Ventilation System | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident | 05000369/LER-2006-001 | Ice Condenser and Floor Cooling System Containment Isolation Valve inoperable longer than allowed by Technical Specification 3.6.3. | | 05000353/LER-2006-001 | HPCI Ramp Generator Signal Converter Failure | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | 05000352/LER-2006-001 | Loss Of One Offsite Circuit Due To Invalid Actuation Of Fire Suppression System | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000336/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor | 05000316/LER-2006-001 | Failure to Comply with Technical Specification 3.6.2, Containment Air Locks | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000315/LER-2006-001 | Plant Shutdown Required by Technical Specification Action 3.6.5.B.1 | | 05000293/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | 05000289/LER-2006-001 | | | 05000287/LER-2006-001 | Actuation of Emergency Generator due to Spurious Transformer Lockout | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000251/LER-2006-001 | Turkey Point Unit 4 05000251 1 OF 6 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000247/LER-2006-001 | Manual Reactor Trip Due to Multiple Dropped Control Rods Caused by Loss of Control Rod Power Due to Personnel Error | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000440/LER-2006-001 | Incorrect Wiring in the Remote Shutdown Panel Results in a Fire Protection Program Violation | | 05000413/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000368/LER-2006-001 | Completion of a Plant Shutdown Required by Technical Specifications Due to Loss of Motive Power to Certain Containment Isolation Valves as a Result of a Phase to Ground Short Circuit in a Motor Control Cubicle | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | 05000306/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown | 05000298/LER-2006-001 | Cooper Nuclear Station 05000298 1 of 4 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000286/LER-2006-001 | I | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000282/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | 05000266/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | 05000261/LER-2006-001 | Manual Reactor Trip Due to Failure of a Turbine Governor Valve Electro-Hydraulic Control Card | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000255/LER-2006-001 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | 05000461/LER-2006-002 | Turbine Bypass Function Lost Due to Circuit Card Maintenance Frequency | | 05000458/LER-2006-002 | Loss of Safety Function of High Pressure Core Spray Due to Manual Deactivation | | 05000456/LER-2006-002 | Units 1 and 2 Entry into Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.3 due to Main Control Room Ventilation Envelope Low Pressure | | 05000443/LER-2006-002 | Noncompliance with the Requirements of Technical Specification 6.8.1.2.a | | 05000387/LER-2006-002 | DMissed Technical Specification surveillance requirement | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000362/LER-2006-002 | Unit 3 Shutdown to Inspect Safety Injection Tank Spiral Wound Gaskets | | 05000336/LER-2006-002 | Manual Reactor Trip Due To Trip Of Both Feed Pumps Following A Loss Of Instrument Air | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000316/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000315/LER-2006-002 | Failure to Comply with Technical Specification Requirement 3.6.13, Divider Barrier Integrity | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000293/LER-2006-002 | | | 05000289/LER-2006-002 | | | 05000251/LER-2006-002 | Intermediate Range High Flux Trip Setpoint Exceeded Technical Specification Allowable Value | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000440/LER-2006-002 | Scaffold Built in the Containment Pool Swell Region | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | 05000413/LER-2006-002 | Safe Shutdown Potentially Challenged by an External Flooding Event and Inadequate Design and Configuration Control | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000388/LER-2006-002 | Missed Technical Specification LCO 3.8.1 Entry for Unit 2 During Unit 1 ESS Bus Testing | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000348/LER-2006-002 | Main Steam Isolation Valve Failure to Close | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000305/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000301/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000286/LER-2006-002 | 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, N.Y. 10511-0249Entergy Tel (914) 734-6700 Fred Dacimo Site Vice President Administration September 13, 2006 Indian Point Unit No. 3 Docket No. 50-286 N L-06-084 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-P1-17 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Subject:L Licensee Event Report # 2006-002-00, "Manual Reactor Trip as a Result of Arcing Under the Main Generator Between Scaffolding and Phase A&B of the Isophase Bus Housing" Dear Sir: The attached Licensee Event Report (LER) 2006-002-00 is the follow-up written report submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73. This event is of the type defined in 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) for an event recorded in the Entergy corrective action process as Condition Report CR-IP3-2006-02255. There are no commitments contained in this letter. Should you or your staff have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Patric W. Conroy, Manager, Licensing, Indian Point Energy Center at (914) 734-6668. Fred R. Dacimo Site Vice President Indian Point Energy Center Docket No. 50-286 NL-06-084 Page 2 of 2 Attachment: LER-2006-002-00 CC: Mr. Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator — Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office Resident Inspector Indian Point Unit 3 Mr. Paul Eddy State of New York Public Service Commission INPO Record Center NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 06/30/2007
(6-2004)
. Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 50 hours.DReported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the Records and FOIA/Privacy Service Branch (T-5 F52), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by internetLICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) e-mail to infocollects@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection. ■ 1. FACILITY NAME 2. DOCKET NUMBER I 3. PAGE
INDIAN POINT 3 05000-286 1 OF 6
4.TITLE: Manual Reactor Trip as a Result of Arcing Under the Main Generator Between
Scaffolding and Phase A&B of the Iso-phase Bus Housing | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000282/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000269/LER-2006-002 | High Energy Line Breaks Outside Licensing Basis May Result in Loss of Safety Function | | 05000263/LER-2006-002 | | | 05000255/LER-2006-002 | | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | 05000254/LER-2006-002 | Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000254 1 of 3 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | 05000483/LER-2006-003 | Unexpected Inoperability of the Emergency Exhaust System due to Inoperable Pressure Boundary | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications |
|