|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20211M6651999-09-0101 September 1999 Errata Page 4-45,reflecting Proposed Changes Requested in ML20211D1551999-08-20020 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Degraded Voltage Relay as-left Setpoint Tolerances ML20210J1261999-07-29029 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising ESF Sys Leakage Limits in post-accident Recirculation Surveillance TSs ML20195E6201999-06-0404 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying Conditions Which Allow Reduction in Number of Means for Maintaining Decay Heat Removal Capability During Shutdown Conditions ML20206R1171999-05-13013 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.1.1,incorporating Administrative Updating & Changing Bases Statement ML20205H0781999-04-0101 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Adding LCO Action Statements,Making SRs More Consistent with NUREG-1430,correcting Conflicts or Inconsistencies Caused by Earlier TS Revs & Revising SFP Sampling ML20203B0511999-02-0202 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Expanding Scope of Systems & Test Requirements for post-accident RB Sump Recirculation ESF Systems & Increasing Max Allowable Leakage of TS 4.5.4 for Applicable Portions of ESF Systems Outside of Containment ML20196H5361998-12-0303 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Decrease in RCS Flow Resulting from Revised Analysis to Allow Operation of Plant with 20% Average Level of SG Tubes Plugged Per SG ML20196G4861998-12-0303 December 1998 Non-proprietary Proposed Tech Specs,Consenting to Transfer & Authorization for Amergen to Possess,Use & Operate TMI-1 Under Essentially Same Conditions & Authorizations Included in Existing License ML20196F8661998-11-25025 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revised Pages for TS Change 277 Changing Surveillances Specs for OTSG ISI for TMI Cycle 13 RFO Exams Which Would Be Applicable for One Cycle of Operation Only. with Certificate of Svc ML20154Q6271998-10-19019 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding Operability & SRs for Remote Shutdown Sys Similar to Requirements in NUREG-1430, Std Tech Specs - B&W Plants, Section 3.3.18 ML20154P8661998-10-19019 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Allowable RCS Specific Activity Limit Based on OTSG Insp Results Performed Each Refueling Outage ML20249B2421998-06-11011 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Alternate High Radiation Area Control ML20217J8201998-03-25025 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 6-1,reflecting Change in Trade Name of Owners & Operator of TMI-1 & Correcting Typo ML20217E5311998-03-23023 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Section 3.1.2 to Incorporate New Pressure Limits for Reactor Vessel IAW 10CFR50,App G for Period of Applicability Through 17.7 EFPY ML20217G0201997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Revised Pages 4-80 & 4-81 Previously Submitted ML20211F3781997-09-24024 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Steam Line Break Accident Dose Consequence ML20211C3421997-09-19019 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.8-3.9b to TS Section 3.1.4 Providing More Restrictive Limit of 0.35 Uci/Gram Dose Equivalent I-131 & Clarifying UFSAR Analysis ML20211C2431997-09-19019 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Decay Heat Removal Sys Leakage ML20210K0011997-08-14014 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TMI-1 UFSAR Section 14.1.2.9 Environ Dose Consequences for TMI-1 Steam Line Break Analysis ML20141J4051997-08-12012 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Surveillance Specification for Once Through Steam Generator Inservice Insp for TMI-1 Cycle 12 Refueling (12R) Exams Applicable to TMI-1 Cycle 12 Operation ML20198E7941997-07-30030 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Addl Sys Leakage Limits & Leak Test Requirements for Systems Outside Containment Which Were Not Previously Contained in TS 4.5.4 Nor Considered in TMI-1 UFSAR DBA Analysis Dose Calculations for 2568 Mwt ML20151K2071997-07-25025 July 1997 Revised TS Page 6-19 Replacing Corresponding Page Contained in 970508 Transmittal of TS Change Request 264 ML20141E1491997-05-0808 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 264, Incorporating Addl NRC-approved Analytical Methods Used to Determine TMI-1 Core Operating Limits ML20140E2471997-04-21021 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1.2,changing Required Borated Water in Each Core Flood Tank to 940 ft,4.5.2.1.b,lowering Surveillance Acceptance Criteria for ECCS HPI Flow to 431 Gpm & 3.3.1.1.f Re Operability of Decay Heat Valves ML20134M1211997-02-0707 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Certain Improvements from Revised STS for B&W plants,NUREG-1430 ML20133D2821996-12-24024 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.15.3 Re Auxiliary & Fuel Handling Bldg Air Treatment Sys ML20132F3301996-12-16016 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Change in Legal Name of Operator of Plant from Gpu Corp to Gpu Inc & Reflecting Plant License & TS Registered Trade Name of Gpu Energy ML20135D0991996-12-0303 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Certain Requirements from Revised B&W Std TS,NUREG-1430 ML20135C5321996-12-0202 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relocation of Audit Frequency Requirements ML20128H4121996-10-0303 October 1996 Errata to Proposed Ts,Adding Revised Table of Contents & Making Minor Editorial Corrections ML20117H0451996-08-29029 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 257, Incorporating Certain Improvements from STS for B&W Plants (NUREG-1430) ML20113D1971996-06-28028 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 259, Allowing Implementation of Recently Approved Option B to 10CFR50,App J ML20112C8791996-05-24024 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Pages for App A.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101R1571996-04-10010 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Addl Group of Surveillances in Which Justification Has Been Completed ML20100J6931996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 254, Revising Proposed TS Page 4-46 on Paragraph 4.6.2 That Provides Addl Testing Requirements in Case Battery Cell Parameters Not Met ML20095J2311995-12-21021 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Raising Low Voltage Action Level to 105 Volts DC ML20092K5471995-09-20020 September 1995 Revised Tech Spec Pages 4-31,4-32 & 4-33,incorporating Change in TS Section 4.4.1.5 ML20091L2911995-08-23023 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Page 6-11a,incorporating Ref to 10CFR20.1302 ML20087F4921995-08-11011 August 1995 Proposed TS Section 3.2 Re Makeup,Purification & Chemical Addition Sys Requirements ML20085N1601995-06-22022 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Replacement Pages in Package & Remove Outdated Pages,In Response to NRC Request for Addl Info ML20084L4351995-06-0101 June 1995 Proposed TS 5.3.1.1,describing Use of Advanced Clad Assemblies ML20084N3501995-06-0101 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting RETS & Relocating TSs Per Guidance in GL 89-01 & NUREG-1430 ML20084B3361995-05-24024 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Change in Surveillance Test Requirements for source-range Nuclear Instrumentation ML20083N7841995-05-17017 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Requests 252, Removing Chemical Addition Sys Requirements from TS to COLR ML20079A7811994-12-23023 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3-32a ML20069A6781994-05-20020 May 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Supporting Cycle 10 Control Rod Trip Insertion Time Testing ML20065M6831994-04-19019 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Deletion of Audit Program Frequency Requirements ML20065K0451994-04-11011 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Relocation of Detailed Insp Criteria,Methods & Frequencies of Containment Tendon Surveillance Program to FSAR & Providing Direct Ref to Existing Tendon Surveillance Program ML20073C7731994-03-22022 March 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Control Rod Trip Insertion Time Testing 1999-09-01
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20211M6651999-09-0101 September 1999 Errata Page 4-45,reflecting Proposed Changes Requested in ML20211D1551999-08-20020 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Degraded Voltage Relay as-left Setpoint Tolerances ML20210S7691999-08-12012 August 1999 Rev 10 to 6610-PLN-4200.02, TMI Emergency Dose Calculation Manual ML20210J1261999-07-29029 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising ESF Sys Leakage Limits in post-accident Recirculation Surveillance TSs ML20195E6201999-06-0404 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying Conditions Which Allow Reduction in Number of Means for Maintaining Decay Heat Removal Capability During Shutdown Conditions ML20206R1171999-05-13013 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.1.1,incorporating Administrative Updating & Changing Bases Statement ML20206R6531999-05-13013 May 1999 Rev 39 to TMI Modified Amended Physical Security Plan ML20205H0781999-04-0101 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Adding LCO Action Statements,Making SRs More Consistent with NUREG-1430,correcting Conflicts or Inconsistencies Caused by Earlier TS Revs & Revising SFP Sampling ML20204B5291999-03-12012 March 1999 Rev 9 to 6610-PLN-4200.02, TMI Emergency Dose Calculation Manual (Edcm) ML20203B0511999-02-0202 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Expanding Scope of Systems & Test Requirements for post-accident RB Sump Recirculation ESF Systems & Increasing Max Allowable Leakage of TS 4.5.4 for Applicable Portions of ESF Systems Outside of Containment ML20196G4861998-12-0303 December 1998 Non-proprietary Proposed Tech Specs,Consenting to Transfer & Authorization for Amergen to Possess,Use & Operate TMI-1 Under Essentially Same Conditions & Authorizations Included in Existing License ML20196H5361998-12-0303 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Decrease in RCS Flow Resulting from Revised Analysis to Allow Operation of Plant with 20% Average Level of SG Tubes Plugged Per SG ML20196F8661998-11-25025 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revised Pages for TS Change 277 Changing Surveillances Specs for OTSG ISI for TMI Cycle 13 RFO Exams Which Would Be Applicable for One Cycle of Operation Only. with Certificate of Svc ML20154P8661998-10-19019 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Allowable RCS Specific Activity Limit Based on OTSG Insp Results Performed Each Refueling Outage ML20154Q6271998-10-19019 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding Operability & SRs for Remote Shutdown Sys Similar to Requirements in NUREG-1430, Std Tech Specs - B&W Plants, Section 3.3.18 ML20154D5491998-10-0101 October 1998 Cancellation Notification of Temporary Change Notice 1-98-0066 to Procedure 6610-PLN-4200.02 ML20206C0911998-09-0101 September 1998 Rev 17 to Odcm ML20249B2421998-06-11011 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Alternate High Radiation Area Control ML20216E9751998-04-13013 April 1998 Emergency Dose Assessment Users Manual, for Insertion Into Rev 7 of Edcm ML20216E9491998-04-0909 April 1998 Rev 7,Temporary Change Notice 1-98-003 to 6610-PLN-4200.02, Edcm, Changing Pages 2 & 57 & Adding New Emergency Dose Assessment Users Manual ML20217J8201998-03-25025 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 6-1,reflecting Change in Trade Name of Owners & Operator of TMI-1 & Correcting Typo ML20217E5311998-03-23023 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Section 3.1.2 to Incorporate New Pressure Limits for Reactor Vessel IAW 10CFR50,App G for Period of Applicability Through 17.7 EFPY ML20202B2061998-01-30030 January 1998 Rev 7,Temporary Change Notice 1-98-0013 to 6610-PLN-4200.02, Edcm ML20198T4721997-12-31031 December 1997 TMI-1 Cycle 12 Startup Rept ML20217G0201997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Revised Pages 4-80 & 4-81 Previously Submitted ML20211F3781997-09-24024 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Steam Line Break Accident Dose Consequence ML20211C2431997-09-19019 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Decay Heat Removal Sys Leakage ML20211C3421997-09-19019 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.8-3.9b to TS Section 3.1.4 Providing More Restrictive Limit of 0.35 Uci/Gram Dose Equivalent I-131 & Clarifying UFSAR Analysis ML20210K0011997-08-14014 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TMI-1 UFSAR Section 14.1.2.9 Environ Dose Consequences for TMI-1 Steam Line Break Analysis ML20141J4051997-08-12012 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Surveillance Specification for Once Through Steam Generator Inservice Insp for TMI-1 Cycle 12 Refueling (12R) Exams Applicable to TMI-1 Cycle 12 Operation ML20198E7941997-07-30030 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Addl Sys Leakage Limits & Leak Test Requirements for Systems Outside Containment Which Were Not Previously Contained in TS 4.5.4 Nor Considered in TMI-1 UFSAR DBA Analysis Dose Calculations for 2568 Mwt ML20151K2071997-07-25025 July 1997 Revised TS Page 6-19 Replacing Corresponding Page Contained in 970508 Transmittal of TS Change Request 264 ML20217M7251997-06-22022 June 1997 Rev 16 to Procedure 6610-PLN-4200.01, Odcm ML20141E1491997-05-0808 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 264, Incorporating Addl NRC-approved Analytical Methods Used to Determine TMI-1 Core Operating Limits ML20140E2471997-04-21021 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.3.1.2,changing Required Borated Water in Each Core Flood Tank to 940 ft,4.5.2.1.b,lowering Surveillance Acceptance Criteria for ECCS HPI Flow to 431 Gpm & 3.3.1.1.f Re Operability of Decay Heat Valves ML20134M1211997-02-0707 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Certain Improvements from Revised STS for B&W plants,NUREG-1430 ML20133D2821996-12-24024 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.15.3 Re Auxiliary & Fuel Handling Bldg Air Treatment Sys ML20132F3301996-12-16016 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Change in Legal Name of Operator of Plant from Gpu Corp to Gpu Inc & Reflecting Plant License & TS Registered Trade Name of Gpu Energy ML20135D0991996-12-0303 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Certain Requirements from Revised B&W Std TS,NUREG-1430 ML20135C5321996-12-0202 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relocation of Audit Frequency Requirements ML20128H4121996-10-0303 October 1996 Errata to Proposed Ts,Adding Revised Table of Contents & Making Minor Editorial Corrections ML20117H0451996-08-29029 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 257, Incorporating Certain Improvements from STS for B&W Plants (NUREG-1430) ML20113D1971996-06-28028 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 259, Allowing Implementation of Recently Approved Option B to 10CFR50,App J ML20112C8791996-05-24024 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Pages for App A.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20138B4641996-05-0606 May 1996 Rev 14 to Procedure 6610-PLN-4200.01, Odcm ML20101R1571996-04-10010 April 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Addl Group of Surveillances in Which Justification Has Been Completed ML20100J6931996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 254, Revising Proposed TS Page 4-46 on Paragraph 4.6.2 That Provides Addl Testing Requirements in Case Battery Cell Parameters Not Met ML20096F0521995-12-31031 December 1995 TMI-1 Cycle 11,Startup Rept ML20095J2311995-12-21021 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Raising Low Voltage Action Level to 105 Volts DC ML20092M1941995-09-21021 September 1995 TMI-1 Pump & Valve IST Program 1999-09-01
[Table view] |
Text
.METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY TEREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 1 Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289
.Technical Srecification Change Recuest No. h3 This Technical Specification Change Request is submitted in support of Licensee's request to change Appendix A to Operating License No. DPR-50 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1.
As a part of this request, proposed replacement pages for Appendix A are also included.
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
)By i Vice Presidst-Generation Sworn and subscribed to me this day of , 1976.Notary Public 1491 004. .. .. ...gelo 290M P
..Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1 (TMI-1)
Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 5c 289 Technical Scecification Chance Request No. h3 The licensee requests that the attached pages be added to Appendix A of the TMI-l Technical Specifications.
Reason For Fronosed Chance To incorporate steam generatcrs inservice inspection into the TMI-l Technical Specifications as requested by the USURC in their letter of Septester 14, 1976, to Mr. R. C. Arnold.
Safety Analysis Justifying Change
.This proposed Technical Specification Change does not involve any unreviewed safety questions in that it only incorpcrates additional inspection restrictions tc ensure the continued integrity of the tube portion of the TMI-l Once-Through Steam Generators.
Il1491 005 i.I I t
....L.18 OTSG TU3E INSERVICE INSFECTION Aurlicability This Technical Specification applies to the inservice inspection of the OTSG tube portion of the reactor coolant pressure boundary.
I Ob.iective The objective of this inservice inspection progra= is to provide assurance of continued integrity of the tube portion of the Orce-Through Steam Generators, while at the same time minimizing radiation exposure to personnel in the perfor=ance cf the inspection.
'i Each stea= generator shall be de=onstrated OPTRABLE by performance of the g i following augmented inservice inspection program and the requirements of Specification 3 13 L.18.1 Steam Generator Samole Selection and Insrection Each stess generator shall be deter =ined OPERA 3LE during shutdevn by i i selecting and inspecting at least the minimum number of steam generators f specified in Table 4.18.1.
h.18.2 Steam Generattr Tube Samule Selection and Insrection 4-The stes= generator tube mini =us sample size, inspcetion result I classificatien, and the corresponding action required shall be as
- lspe:ified in Table k.18.2.
The inservice inspection of stea= generator
- 1 tubes shall te perforced at the freq =ncies specified in Specification elk.18.3 and the inspected tubes shall be verified acceptable per the i!acceptance criteria of Specification h.18.h.
The tubes celected for 1 1491 006 L-63
.t't.!l..each inservice inspection shall include at leart 1 % of the total number of tubes in all steam generators:
la.The first inservice inspection of each steam generator included 1 a rando= sampin... of greater than 3% of the tubes in each steam generator.
b.The second and subsequent inservice inspection may be from one
!lsteam generator and shall include 1 % of the total installed i!steam generator heat transfer surface. All tubes to be examined i in the second and subsequent intervsis shall te from previously examined tubes. All unplugged tubes with indications greater than 20% of the nominal vall thickness shall be included in
- !!those tubes selected for reexamination.
The results of each sample inspection sPall be classified into one i.lof the following two categories:
lCategory Insteetion Results
!C-1 Less than 105 of the total tubes
{inspected in a steam generator J are degraded tubes exhibiting
, i indications in excess of 20%
of the vall thickness.
C-2 10% or more of the total tubes inspected in a stea generator are degraded tubes exhibiting indications in excess of 2CG cf the vall thickness.
NOTE: In all inspections, previcusif degraded tubes must exhibit i significant (> 10%) further vall penetrations to be included 3n the above percentage calculatiens.
I 1491 007lu_6u i..: f k.18.3 Insteetion Frecuencies The required inservice inspections of steam generator tubes shall be performed at the following frequencies:
The first (baseline) inspection was performed after 6 effective a.full power =enths but within 24 caleadar =onths of initial
- lcriticality. The second inservice inspection shall be perfor
- ed
- 1 not less than 9 nor more than 2h calendar =enths after the
'previous inspection. The third and sub equent inspections j shall be performed within additional periods of 3-1/3 years.
f b.If, in say inepection, an excess of 10% of the tubes examined v, exhibit indications in excess of 20% of the vall thickness , the
'next two inspections shall be performed at one to two year intervals.
If, in these examinations , .no more than 10% of the ttbes examined exhibit either (a) additional degradation (greater t than 10% of vall thickness) of previously degraded tubes, (b) tubes with new indicatiens in excess of 20% vall thi 'kness , or (c) a ec=binntion of both, the inspection intervals may continue
'at 3-1/3 yecrs.
Additional, unscheduled inservice inspections shall be perfor ed c.!on each stea= enerator in accordance with the first sa=ple i s inspe: tion specified in Table k.13.2 during the shutdown subsequent
'i to a.y of the following conditions:
, 1.Primary-to-secondary leaks which exceed the limits of
.I 5~.cifi:ation 3.13 2.A seismic cecurrence greater than the Operating Basi i Earthquake.
- 1491 008 4 i L-65
..3 A loss of coolant accident requiring actuation of the engineering safeguards , or k.A major =ain steam line or feedvater line break.
L.18.h Accentance Criteria a.As used in this Specification:
1.Imrerfection means an exception to the dimensions, finish or contour of a tube fro = that required by fabrication drawings or specifications.
Eddy-current testing indications below 20% of the nominal tube vall thickness, if detectable, may be considered as i= perfections.
2.Deeradation means a service-induced cracking, vastage, vear or general corrosior occurring on either inside or outside of a tube.
, 3 Deeraded Tube =eans a tube contt ining i= perfections < 20%
of the nominal vall thickness caused by degradation.
h.% Degradation means the percentage of the tube vall thickness affected or re=oved by degradation.
5 Defect means an i= perfection of such severity that it exceeds the plugging limit. A tube containing a defect is defective.
6.Plugeine Limit means the imperfection depth at or beyond which the tube shall be rs=oved from service because it may become unse.rviceable prior to the next inspection and is equal to h0% of the no=ina) tube vall thickness, unless higher limits are shown to be acceptable by analysis.
7.Tube Inspection means en inspection of that portion of the stea= generator tube from the bottom of the upper tubesheet completely to the top of the lower tubesheet.
1491 009 h-66
.4 b.Tne stes= generator shall be deter =ined OPERABLE after completing the corresponding a ; ions (plugging including all tubes exceeding a the plugging limit and all tubes containing through-wall cracks) required by Table 4.18.2.
h.18.5 Renorts a.Following each inservice inspection of steam generator tubes, the number of tubes plugged in each steam generator shall be I reported to the Commission within 30 daya.
l b.The complete results of the steam generator tube inservice
.}'inspection shall be included in the Annual Operating Report for the period in which this inspection was co=pleted. This report shall include:
p 1.Nu=ber and extent of tubes inspected.
l2.Lccation and percent of wall-thickness penetra+. ion for i 3 each indication of an imperfection.
!'3.Identification of tubes plugged.
c.Results of steam generator tube inspections which require prompt notification of the Ccemission shall be reported pursuant , ' , to Specificatien 6.9 2 prior to resumption of plant operation.
lThe written followup of this report shall provide a description i of investigations cenducted to determine cause of the tube
.degradation and corrective teasures taken to prevent recurrence.
I 1*Bases The Surveillance Require =ents for inspecticn of the stea: generator tubes ensure that the structural integrity of this portica of the RCS will be maintained.
I 1491 010 i k-o7
+i ,..;.The pro 6:am for inservice inspection of steam generator tubes is based on ASME i Code Secticn XI, Winter 1975 Addenda.
Inservice Inspection of steam generator tubing is essential in order to maintain surveillance of the conditions of the tubes in the event that there is evidence of mechanical danage or progressive degradation due to design, manufacturing errors, or inservice conditions that lead to corrosion.
Inservice inspection of steam generator tubing also provides a means of chrrscterizing the nature and cause of any tube degradation so that corrective measures can be taken.
.6 I (:-The unit is expected to be operated in a manner such that the secondary coolant I!vill be maintained within those che=istry limits found to result in negligible i corrosion of the steam generator tubes.
If the secondary coolant chemistry is i not maintained within these chemisti+ limits, localized corrosien may likely result in stress corrosion cracking.
, ilThe extent of stea= generator tube leakage due to cracking would be limited by i'.the secondary coolant activity, Specification 3 13.
Cracks having a primary-
.to-secondary leakage less than this limit during operation vill have an adequate i margin of safety to withstand the loads impt ,ed during normal operation and by f postulated accidents.
(;.I*Operating plants have demonstrated that scnitoring of secondary coolant can llreadily detect activity in the range of the Specification 3.13 limit.
Leakage in excess of this limit vill require plant shutdown and an unscheduled inspection, during which
..e leaking tubes vill be located and plugged.
.-,.Wastage-type defects are unlikely with proper chemistry treatment of the secondary coolant.
However, even if a defect vould develop in service, it vill be found during scheduled inservice steam generator tube examinations.
Plugging vill be required for 40% of the tube nominal vall thickness, unless I higher limits are shown to '
4cceptable by analysis.
Steam generator tube inspections of operating plants have demonstrated the capability to reliably detect degradation that has penetrated 20% of the original tube vall thickness.
Whenever the results of any stea= generator tubing inservice inspection fall into category C-2 on the 3rd sample inspection, (See Table h.18.2), these results vill be promptly reported to the Com=ission pursuant to Specification
, 6.9.2 prior to resumption of plant operation. Such cases vill be considered lI, by the Commission on a case-by-case basis and =ay result in a requirenent for
!'analysis , laboratory examinations , terts , additional eddy-current inspection, i and revision of the Technical Specifications, if necessary.
I-1491 012'i i: I a I-..I I 1
_-'.TABLE k.18.1 MINIMUM NUMBER OF STEAM GENERATORS TO BE
.INS?ECTED DURING INSERVICE INSPECTION Preservice Inspection None I No. of Steam Generators per unit Two g[First Inservice Inspection Two i 1 Second & Subsequent Inservice Inspections Cne i ,!!TABLE NOTATION:
!t 1.The Inservice Inspection may be limited to one steam generator on a rotating schedule enecmpassing 35 of the tubes in that steam generator
.if the results of the first and subsequent inspections indicate that both steam generaters are perforning in a like manner. Note that under some circu= stances, the operating conditions in one steam generator nay be found to be more se'rere than those in the other steam generator. Under such I g circumstances the sample sequence shall be modified to inspect the most I severe conditiens.
013.Me
.*..,.TABLE h.18.2 STEAM GE:!ERATCR TUEE INSFECTIO:
, 1st SAMPLE II:SPECTION 2nd SAMPLE I:ISPECTION 3rd SAMPLE INSPECTION 4 Sample Size Result Action Required hesult Action equired
{- it Action Required A minimum C-1 None N/A:I/A N/A N/Al;of lh5 of: total SG C-2 Plug defective C-1 None N/A N/A!Tubes (If tubes. Inspect both SG's additional 35 C-2? lug defective C-1 None inspected, of tubes in tubes. Inspect inspect 1 5 each SG sdditional 35 C-2 Plus defective
!'of each of tubes in tubes. Notify I SG's Tubes each SG IiRC pursusnt to
[If only Specification 6.9.S i one SG 4-inspected, i inspect 35 of that.SG's , Tubes)'_i i NCTE: 1st Sa:ple Inspection as used in this table refers to the required 1'inspections at the frequencies listed in Specification h.18.13 I 1491 014 i I.L-71