L-2006-098, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Calendar Year 2005

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:50, 13 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Calendar Year 2005
ML061390027
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/18/2006
From: Johnston G
Florida Power & Light Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2006-098
Download: ML061390027 (63)


Text

Florida Power & Light Company, 6501 S. Ocean Drive. Jensen Beach, FL 34957 FPL April 18, 2006 L-2006-098 10 CFR 50.4 10 CFR 50.36 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 RE: St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Calendar Year 2005 The attached report is being submitted pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.8. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information summaries and analytical results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for calendar year 2005.Please contact us should there be any questions regarding this report.Very truly yours, Gordon L. Johnston Acting Vice President St. Lucie Plant Attachment GLJ/tlt an FPL Group company 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 LICENSE NOS. DPR-67, NPF-16 DOCKET NOS. 50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted by: Florida DOH Prepared brA Reviewed by:

  1. I .4 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT-UNITS I & 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary Deviations

/ Missing Data Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection Capabilities Land Use Census Key to Sample Locations Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power &Light Company's St. Lucie Site First Quarter 2005 Second Quarter 2005 Third Quarter 2005 Fourth Quarter 2005 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program 2005 PAGE I 4 TABLE 1 TABLE 1A TABLE 1B TABLE 2 ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C i 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9.1.8 of St. Lucie Unit 1 and St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the radiological environmental monitoring program for the calendar year indicated.

This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications.

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A. Purpose The purpose of the radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures to members of the public resulting from station operation.

The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.B. Program Description The radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to the St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Section 3/4.12.1., Monitoring Program.1. Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:

a. Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.
b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

c. Surface water samples are collected from two locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly, respectively.

Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

I 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 d. Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

9. A goat milk sample is collected from one location.

The sample is collected and analyzed on a quarterly basis. No other milk-producing goats feeding on similar wild vegetation have been found in the St. Lucie region;therefore, there is no control location for this sample type.Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2. Analytical Responsibility Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH), Bureau of Radiation Control (BRC).Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel.

Samples are analyzed at the DOH BRC Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.C. Analytical Results Table 1, Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.Deviations from the sample schedule or missing data, if any, are noted and explained in Table 1A. Samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI' LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Table 1B. Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.2 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT- UNITS i & 2 D. Land Use Census A land use census out to a distance of a five-mile radius from the St. Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the 16 meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census Summary.E. Interlaboratorv Comparison Program The intercomparison program consists of participating in the DOE Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).This program provides similar testing (matrices, nuclides, and levels) as the former EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program and is referred to as the Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).The samples are analyzed using the methods applicable to the REMP (gamma spectroscopy, Gross Beta, and Tritium for water).From the MAPEP handbook: Acceptance criteria were developed from a review of precision and accuracy data compiled by other performance evaluation programs (PEPs), the analytical methods literature, from several MAPEP pilot studies, and from what is considered reasonable, acceptable, and achievable for routine analyses among the more experienced laboratories.

The results for nuclides associated with the REMP are listed in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM.F. Effect of 2005 Hurricane Season Hurricanes Wilma affected the Air Sampling portion of St. Lucie's REMP.* All five Air Sampling Stations had reduced run times due to power loss.* Two of five Air Sampling Stations lost their particulate filters due to wind damage to the filter mounting system.* Other aspects of program (e.g., TLDs soil, water, vegetation sampling) were not affected.The REMP was fully restored well in advance of Units 1 and 2 re-start.3 a 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 III. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A. Reporting of Results The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by St. Lucie Plant ODCM. Table I provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation.

These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7, which are common in the Florida environment.

B. Interpretation of Results 1. Direct Radiation:

The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations.

The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the pre-operational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1 .2. Air ParUculates/Radioiodine:

The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents.

All samples for radiolodine yielded no detectable 1-131. Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation.

The results for air parUculate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements that were made during the pre-operational surveillance program. Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.3. Surface Water: Tritium was detected in 2 of 52 indicator location samples and in 1 of 12 control location samples. The highest level seen was at the control locations and is less than five percent of the Required LLD specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1.No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected.

Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1.4 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 4. Waterbome Sediment and Food Products: The results for radioactivity measurements in waterbome sediment, fish and crustacean samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the pre-operational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents.

Results for the waterbome sediment, fish and crustacean samples are summarized in Table 1.5. Broad Leaf Vegetation:

The results of radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the pre-operational surveillance program.Cs-137 was detected in one of 12 indicator location samples and in one of 12 control location samples. The highest level seen was at the control locations and is less than one-half of the Required LLD specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1.There were no indications of any other nuclides attributed to plant effluents.

Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.6. Milk, Goat: Cesium-1 37 was detected the sample. The presence of this nuclide is considered"weapons fallout";

the animal uptake is due to the foraging habits of the goat.Samples of the wild vegetation consumed by the "pet goat" (Brazilian Pepper)Indicated the presence of Cs-137. The State Department of Health found comparable levels of Cs-137 in samples from numerous wilderness locations.

The goat is no longer fresh', no more samples are available.

The owner of the pet goat has indicated the goat may never return to milch. The Goat-Milk sampling is being dropped from the program.7. Land Use Census: No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census. No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway)20 percent greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.5 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT- UNITS I & 2 8. Interlaboratory Comparison Program: The State laboratory participated MAPEP 13 and 14.In MAPEP 13, the results Air Filter and Water matrices for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable.

The Soil matrix had a few warnings in response to over-estimated results. The vegetation sample had on warning result for a nuclide (Co-57) not typically associated with plant effluents.

In MAPEP 14, the results for Air filter, Soil, and Water matrices for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable.

The Vegetation matrix failed, all but one result was Not Acceptable.

An investigation found the Lab Technician invoked an improper counting geometry file.Reanalyzing the assay using the correct geometry file returned Acceptable results for all nuclides except Co-57. Co-57 is not typically associated with plant effluents; assay using REMP methods will typically yield poor results for low levels.The results are listed in Attachment C.C. Conclusions The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant radiological environmental monitoring program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased.

The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St. Lucie Units 1 and 2, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.6 TABLE 1 Page 1 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Exposure Rate, 1 0 8 d 5.0 (1041104)4.2 -6.5 NW-10 10 mi., NW 5.4 (414)6.3 -6.5 5.3 (414)4.9 -5.7 Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 Page 2 of 9 f ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO -Ci/M 3 Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (fob Range Mean (f)b Range 131. ., , % A .. ..I, YUv VV.UZQ 1MUA1<MUJA Gross Beta, 258 0.0025 0.014 (205/206)0.004 -0.030 H-34 0.5 mi., N 0.014 (52/52)0.005 -0.029 0.015 (52/52)0.005 -0.029 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20 7 Be 134CS 1 3 7 Cs 2 1 0 Pb 0.0052 0.00069 0.00066 0.1610 (16/16)0.1074 -0.2163 H-34 0.5 mi., N 0.1796 (4/4)0.1425 -0.2163 0.1616 (4/4)0.1483 -0.1822<MDA<MDA 0.0262 (11/16)0.0173 -0.0313<MDA<MDA 0.0216 (3/4)0.0173 -0.0285 H-34 0.5 mi., N 0.0301 (3/4)0.0293 -0.0313 Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO -Ci/LITER Page 3 of 9 Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (f0b Range Mean (f)b Range Tritium, 64 230 114 (2/52)110- 118 H-15<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 114 (2152)110- 118 142 (1/12)Gamma Isotopic, 64 40K 54Mn 5 9 Fe 58Co 60Co 65Zn 9 5 Zr-Nb 1311'34Cs 1 3 7 Cs 1 40Ba-La 60 4 8 4 4 8 7 5 5 5 11 349 (52152)257 -425<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA H-15<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 349 (52152)257 -425 338 (12/12)262 -424<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 Page 4 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO -Ci/Kg, DRY Location with Highest Annual Mean-Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 140 374 (2/2)257 -490< MDA 2 1 0 Pb mRa 2 3 2 Th 238u 58co 60Co 49 258 (2/2)216 -299 96 (1/2)411 (1/2)H-15<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE H-15<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE H-15<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE H-15<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 374 (2/2)257 -490 219 (2/2)208 -230<MDA 258 (2/2)216 -299 96 (1/2)411 (1/2)<MDA 69 (2/2)65 -73<MDA<MDA 9 12<MDA<MDA<MDA 14<MDA<MDA<MDA 1 3 7 cs 12<MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE I Page 5 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO -CiIKg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (0 b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 130 1204 (2/2)839 -1568 H-15<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 1204 (2/2)839 -1568 1783 (2/2)1736 -1830 22 6 Ra 22 8 Ra 54Mn 5 9 Fe'co< MDA<MDA<MDA 121 (1/2)<MDA 9<MDA 16 9 19 17<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA 6 5 Zn'34Cs 1 3 7 Cs<MDA<MDA 9<MDA<MDA<MDA 9<MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE I Page 6 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Luciae Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

FISH UNITS: PICO -Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (0b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (fb Range Mean (0b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 130 2788 (2/2)2368 -3208 H-15<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 2788 (2/2)2368 -3208 2212 (2/2)1838 -2587 54Mn 5 9 Fe 5 8 Co 60co 65Zn 134CS 1 3 7 Cs 9<MDA<MDA 16 9 10<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA 17<MDA<MDA<MDA 9<MDA<MDA 9<MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE 1 Page 7 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO -Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (fb Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona Locations Mean (0bRange (LLD) Mean (f0b Range Gamma Isotopic, 36 T Be 71 40K 100 924 (24/24)452 -2036 4286 (24/24)3233 -5746<MDA H-52 1 mi., S/SSE H-51 1 mi., N/NNW 958 (12/12)539 -2036 4449 (12/12)3699 -5746 1215 (12/12)505 -2056 3521 (12/12)2478 -6025<MDA 58Co 1311'3 4Cs 137cs 6 8<MDA 9 8<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA 8 14 (1/24)21 0 Pb 2 1 2 Pb 2 6 Ra<MDA H-52 1 mi., S/SSE H-52 1 mi., S/SSE 14 (1/12)26 (1/12)<MDA<MDA< MDA 358 (1/12)319 (5/24)210 -403 344 (3/12)284 -403 Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE I Page 8 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

MILK UNITS: PICO -Ci/LITER Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 1 OK 60 1532 (1/1) H-101 1532 (1/1) n/ae 3.5 mi., WSW 21MPb -CODA --n/a 212Pb _ <MDA --n/a 1311. (Chemical 0.1 <MDA --n/a separation

)134Cs 5 <MDA --n/a 1 3 7 Cs 5 27 (1/1) H-101 27 (1/1) n/a 3.5 mi., WSW Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements

= 0 TABLE I Page 9 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)NOTES a. The LLD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.LLDs in this column are at time of measurement.

The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

b. Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).c. Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.d. Results were based upon the average net response of three elements in a TLD (thermoluminescent dosimeter).
e. There are no other milk producing goats grazing on similar vegetation, back yard grass and wild bushes in the St. Lucie region.Therefore, there is no control location.MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 TABLE 1A (page 1 of 2)DEVIATIONS

/ MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Location: Dates: Deviation:

Description of Problem: Corrective Action: B) Pathway.Deviation:

Description of Problem: Corrective Action: Dates: Affected Locations:

H-08, 6 miles West-northwest H-12, 12 miles South H-14, 1 mile Southeast H-30, 2 miles West H-34, 0.5 miles North Airborne, Particulates

& Radioiodines H-34, 0.5 miles North 10-12-05 to 10-19-05 Failure to perform continuous monitoring Power was off at time of collection; sample duration was 164.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> out of the 168.3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> period.Requested restoration of power. Power to be restored same day; air sampling equipment will auto-start.Airborne, Particulates

& Radioiodines Failure to perform continuous monitoring Power loss due to hurricane Wilma caused smaller then expected sample volume Restored Power 10-19-05 to 10-25-05, landfall late in planned sampling period of 10-19-05 to 10-26-05 Runtime (run hours out of sample period hours)128.8 out of 150 As found: Power On; 140 out of 146 117 out of 144 121 out of 147 Power off at beginning of period: 109 out of 142 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 TABLE 1A (page 2 of 2)DEVIATIONS

/ MISSING DATA C) Pathway: Airborne, Particulates

& Radioiodines Deviation:

Failure to perform continuous monitoring Description of Particulate Filter loss due to hurricane Wilma Problem: Corrective Replaced Filter Action: Dates: 10-19-05 to 10-25-05 Affected Locations:

H-14, I mile southeast H-30, 2 miles West D) Pathway: Airborne, Particulates

& Radioiodines Deviation:

Failure to perform continuous monitoring Description of Power loss due to hurricane Wilma extends into next sampling Problem: period Corrective Action: Restored Power Dates: 10-25-05 to 11-03-05 Affected Locations:

Runtime (run hours out of sample period hours)H-14, I mile southeast 107 out of 220 H-30, 2 miles West 118 out of 216 H-34, 0.5 miles North 204 out of 223 E) Pathway: Ingestion:

Milk, goat Location:

H 101, 3.5 miles west-southwest Date: Second quarter 2005 Deviation:

Failure to monitor Description of Pet goat is no longer fresh; owner indicated animal will not Problem: become milch.Corrective Action: None: Deleting this from ODCM due to loss of sampling capabilities. (This pet goat was the only milch animal within 5 miles of the power plant.)

2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS 1 & 2 TABLE 1B ANALYSIS WITH LLDs ABOVE THE REQUIRED DETECTION CAPABILITIES (LLDs) Listed in ODCM TABLE 4.12-1 1/1/2005-12/31/2005 The values specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS (Page 1 of 2)Distance to Nearest (a. b)Sector N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 6/05 -7/05 Milk (c) Animal o (e)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L (f)L L L L L L L L 6/05 -7/05 Residence 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5/142 (g)3.3/152 (g)3.3/191 2.2/212 1.9/235 1.9/240 1.9/260 2.2/281 3.5/304 3.4/342 (g)6/05 -7/05 Garden (d)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L L L L 3.41248 (h)L L L L

-* *2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS (Page 2 of 2)NOTES a. All categories surveyed out to a five-mile radius from the St. Lucie Plant.b. The following format is used to denote the location: distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)For example, a residence located in the southeast sector at a distance of 1.5 miles bearing 142 degrees is recorded as 1.5/142.c. Potential milk animal locations.

d. Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.e. 0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area.f. L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.9. Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:

Sector Distance Description SSE 1.8/147 Fire Station NNW 2.8/348 A new community is being developed.

At the current time, there are no houses available for occupancy.

h. The garden is just 500 square feet; it is a herb garden in a residence's backyard.

The owner is unwilling to provide a sample; field sampling technician feels garden is incapable of supplying sufficient sample to satisfy LLD requirements.

It is not included In the REMP program.

2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS

-5; ..:2005. .ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS 1 & 2 A: A A A, e V , a v , < .; :>-<- A.' ~ Yz,:.. N4";'~~"W' A"* y " U4wqk? 2 ,.ff :;. ;'. s ,, .t .i,,0S<C ., X ,, ; A , X ;, : X'; 0"; i D '. f.D .%' ! .,'; ; (c o;-fwPG ~'0-0g 1 -. 't~~ : .2005 -ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE LOCATIONS (10 MILES)NW-10 ' H32 Vero Beach (P/CHEMC-2008-F2-RO) 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS 1 & 2 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 1 OF 4 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

QUARTERLY Location Name Direction Sector N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-lo SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-lo S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-I Control: H-32 N NNW NNW NW NW WNW WNW WNW W W W WSW WSW WSW SW SW SW SSW SSW SSW S S SSE SSE SSE SE Approximate Distance (miles)1 5 9 6 10 3 5 10 2 5 9 2 5 10 2 5 10 3 6 8 5 10 10 5 10 1 Descrintion AlA, North of Blind Creek South of Pete Stone Creek Coast Guard Station Indian River Dr., at Rio Vista Dr.S.R. 68 at S.R. 607 Cemetery South of 7107 Indian River Dr.U.S. 1 at S.R. 712 S.R. 70, West of Turnpike 7609 Indian River Drive Oleander and Sager Street Interstate 95 at S.R. 709 8503 Indian River Dr.Prima Vista at Yacht Club Del Rio at Davis Street 9207 Indian River Drive U.S. 1 at Village Green Dr.Port St. Lucie Blvd. at Cairo Rd.10307 Indian River Drive U.S. 1 at Port St. Lucie Blvd.Pine Valley at Westmoreland Rd.13179 Indian River Drive U.S. 1 at S.R. 714 Indian River Dr. at Quail Run Lane Entrance to Nettles Island Elliot Museum South of Cooling Canal NNW 19 University of Florida IFAS Vero Beach 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 2 OF 4 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

WEEKLY Location Name H-08 H-14 H-30 H-34 Control: H-12 Direction Sector WNW SE W N Approximate Distance (miles)6 1 2 0.5 Description FPL Substation, Weatherbee Rd.On-Site, Near South Property Line Power Line, 7609 Indian River Drive On-Site at Meteorology Tower S 12 FPL Substation, SR-76 Stuart 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 3 OF 4 PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

H-1 5 WEEKLY, H-59 MONTHLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance (miles)Description H-15 ENE/E/SSE<1 Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side AlA Control: H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance (miles)Description H-15 ENE/E/ESE<1 Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side AlA Control: H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 4 OF 4 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Name H-1 5 Direction Sector ENE/E/ESE S/SSE Approximate Distance (miles)Description

<1 Ocean Side, Vicinity of St. Lucie Plant Control: H-59 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED:

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

MONTHLY Location Name H-51 H-52 Direction Sector N/NNW S/SSE Approximate Distance (miles)I 1 10-20 Description Off-Site Near North Property Line Off-Site Near South Property Line South End, Hutchinson Island Control: H-59 S/SSE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

MILK SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

QUARTERLY Location Name H-101 Direction Sector WSW Approximate Distance (miles)3.5 Description One Goat, Private Residence, Spanish Lakes, East of USI Control: None: Not found any fresh goats with similar grazing activities (backyard grass & wild vegetation) 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ST. LUCIE SITE 2005 First Quarter 2005 Second Quarter 2005 Third Quarter 2005 Fourth Quarter 2005 SL QR 1Q-2005 ST. LUCIE SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Sampling First Quarter, 2005 Sample Type 1. Direct Radiation 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates

3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Collection Frequency Locations Sampled Quarterly 27 Weekly 5 Weekly 5 Weekly 1 Number of Samples 27 65 65 Monthly Semiannually 2 2 13 3 2 3.b. Shoreline Sediment 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation 4.c. Milk Semiannually Semiannually Monthly Quarterly 2 2 3 1 2 2 9 I Total: 189 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection

(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity in the sample.The marine fauna listed In this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.1 of 7 SL QR IQ-2005 1. DIRECT RADIATION

-TLDs -(uR/hour)Sample Site N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 Deployment 07-Dec-04 Collection 03-Mar 4.8 +/- 0.2 4.9 +/- 0.2 4.6 +/- 0.2 4.8 +/- 0.2 6.3 +/- 0.3 Sample Site SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-lo Deployment 07-Dec-04 Collection 03-Mar-05 4.2 +/- 0.2 6.0 +/- 0.3 5.0 +/- 0.2 4.6 +/- 0.2 5.3 +/- 0.2 5.2 +/- 0.2 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-1 0 5.0 +/- 0.2 4.9 +/- 0.2 5.5 +/- 0.2 W-2 W-5 W-10 4.5 +/- 0.2 4.9 +/- 0.2 4.9 +/- 0.2 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-1 0 SE-A H-32 4.7 +/- 0.2 4.5 +/- 0.2 4.5 +/- 0.2 4.6 +/- 0.2 5.1 +/-0.2 4.6 +/- 0.2 4.9 +/- 0.2 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 4.6 +/- 0.2 4.6 +/- 0.2 4.3 +/- 0.2 2of7 SL QR 1Q-2005 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-(DCi/ m 3)Collection Date 06-Jan-05 13-Jan-05 20-Jan-05 27-Jan-05 03-Feb-05 1 0-Feb-05 16-Feb-05 23-Feb-05 03-Mar-05 09-Mar-05 15-Mar-05 22-Mar-05 31-Mar-05 H08<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01 H12<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01 H14 H30<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01 H34<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.01 3 of 7 SL QR IQ-2005 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA -(pCi/M 3)Sample Sites Collection Date 06-Jan-05 13-Jan-05 20-Jan-05 27-Jan-05 03-Feb-05 10-Feb-05 16-Feb-05 23-Feb-05 03-Mar-05 09-Mar-05 15-Mar-05 22-Mar-05 31-Mar-05 Mean: H08 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.003 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 H12 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.001 H14 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.004 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.016 i 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.011 i 0.002 0.010 i 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.001 H30 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.003 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.001 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.001 H34 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.001 2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m 3)First Quarter, 2005 SamDle Site H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 Be-7 0.1559 +/- 0.0139 0.1626 +/- 0.0156 0.1768 +/- 0.0145 0.1687 +/- 0.0141 0.2163 +/- 0.0133 K-40<0.0255<0.0216<0.0231<0.0218<0.0218 Cs-134<0.0019<0.0009<0.0018<0.0020<0.0009 Cs-137<0.0015<0.0011<0.0017<0.0015<0.0010 Pb-210<0.0560 0.0285 +/- 0.0040<0.0518<0.0508 0.0313 +/- 0.0038 4 of 7 SL QR IQ-2005 3.a. SURFACE WATER -(PCi/L)Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)H15 06-Jan-05

<124 359+/- 34 <3 <3 <5 <4 <8 <6 <5 <3 <4 <6 13-Jan-05

<124 342 +/- 38 <4 <4 <10 <6 <8 <8 <6 <5 <5 <8 20-Jan-05

<124 309 +/-26 <2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <4 <3 <3 <2 <4 27-Jan-05

<127 345 +/- 18 <2 <1 <3 <2 <4 <2 <2 <2 <2 <3 03-Feb-05

<126 333 +/- 35 <3 <3 <8 <4 <7 <7 <5 <3 <3 <7 10-Feb-05

<126 362 +/-40 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <7 <6 <4 <4 <6 16-Feb-05

<126 403 +/- 29 <3 <3 <5 <3 <7 <5 <3 <4 <3 <9 23-Feb-05

<126 385 +/- 37 <4 <4 <9 <4 <10 <6 <5 <5 <5 <9 03-Mar-05

<135 353 +/- 31 <3 <4 <7 <4 <8 <7 <5 <4 <4 <5 09-Mar-05

<135 310 +/- 33 <5 <4 <10 <6 <11 <7 <5 <5 <6 <11 15-Mar-05

<138 354 +/- 34 <3 <4 <8 <4 <10 <6 <4 <4 <4 <7 22-Mar-05

<138 348 +/- 26 <3 <3 <6 <4 <5 <4 <3 <3 <2 <5 31-Mar-05

<138 330 +/- 35 <4 <4 <7 <5 <10 <6 <4 <5 <5 <13 H59 13-Jan-05

<124 295 +/-40 <4 <4 <8 <5 <11 <7 <6 <5 <5 <6 03-Feb-05

<126 262+/-41 <6 <5 <12 <7 <12 <11 <7 <6 <7 <10 04-Mar-05

<135 332 +/- 49 <6 <4 <10 <6 <12 <8 <6 <7 <7 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.5 of 7

  • 1 SL QR 1Q-2005 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT -(DCi/ka. dryweight)

Sample Site H15 H59 Collection Date 10-Feb-05 10-Feb-05 Be-7<81<1 00 K-40 257 +/-44 230 +/- 59 Co-58<9<11 Co-60<8<12 Cs-134<11<14 Cs-1 37<9<11 Pb-210<487<854 Ra-226 216 +/- 93<344 Th-232<49 73 +/- 17 U-238<374<578 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA

-(Blue Crab) -(oCi/ka. wet weiaht)Sample Site H15 H59 Collection Date 18-Mar-05 15-Mar-05 K-40 1568 +/- 204 1736 +/- 199 Mn-54 Co-58<25 <28<16 <15 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226<53 <23 <53 <23 <28 <450<41 <21 <44 <20 <21 <399 Ra-228<130<96 4.a.2. FISH -(Mixed Fish) -(pCi/ku. wet weight)Sample Collection Site Date i H15 10-Feb-05 H59 15-Mar-05 K-40 3208 +/- 267 2587 +/- 174 Mn-54<36 Co-58<32 Fe-59<63 Co-60 Zn-65<39 <72 Cs-1 34<42 Cs-1 37<34<16 Ra-226<457<389 Ra-228 w<121<81<21 <18 <36 <22 <43 <22 6 of 7 SL QR IQ-2005 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian PeDper -(DCi/ka. wet weiaht)Sample Site H51 H52 H59 Collection Date 13-Jan-05 03-Feb-05 03-Mar-05 13-Jan-05 03-Feb-05 03-Mar-05 13-Jan-05 03-Feb-05 04-Mar-05 Be-7 1118 +/- 38 1391 +/- 112 716+ 64 1767 + 74 2036 +/- 53 914 +/- 87 2056 +/- 107 1582 +/- 105 1354 +/- 78 K-40 4805 +/- 110 4440 +/- 244 4274 + 175 4913 +/- 172 3602 +/- 102 3654 +/- 191 3048 +/- 203 2598 +/- 204 2478 +/- 173 1-131<7<18<15<10<9<16<13<21<17 Cs-134<7<22<12<11<8<15<16<16<16 Cs-1 37<7<19<14<11<8<19<16 26+/-8<18 Pb-210<1046<2629<760<674<1149<2296<2501<2614<2278 Ra-226<163<328 353 +/- 137<283<176 284 +/- 126<353<406<364 4.c. MILK -(oCi/L)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 1-131 Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A)H101 31-Mar-05 1532 +/- 58 <0.3 <4 27 +/- 3 <8 (A) This tabulated LLD value is for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity.

7 of 7 SL QR 2Q-2005 ST, LUCIE SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 2005 Sample Tvpe 1. Direct Radiation 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates Collection Frequency Quarterly Weekly Weekly Locations Sampled 27 5 5 Number of Samples 27 65 65 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation 4.c. Milk Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly Quarterly 1 0 13 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 0 Total: 182 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection

(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity in the sample.The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.1 of 7 i SL QR 2Q-2005 1. DIRECT RADIATION

-TLDs -(uR/hour)Sample Site N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-1 0 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 Deployment 03-Mar-05 Collection 08-Jun-05 4.7 i 0.3 4.7 +/- 0.3 5.0 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3 6.3 +/-0.4 4.7 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3 5.6 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3 4.9 +/- 0.3 5.0 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3 4.6 +/- 0.3 4.4 +/- 0.3 Sample Site SW-2 SW-5 SW-lo SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-1o S-5 S-10 S/SSE-1 0 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-I H-32 Deployment 03-Mar-05 Collection 08-Jun-05 4.7 +/- 0.3 6.0 +/- 0.4 4.7 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3 5.3 +/- 0.3 5.4 +/- 0.3 4.7 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3 4.6 +/- 0.3 4.3 +/- 0.3 5.2 +/- 0.3 4.5 +/- 0.3 5.2 +/- 0.3 2of7 SL QR 2Q-2005 2,a 2.a. IODINE-1 31 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-(pCi/ m3)Collection Date 05-Apr-05 11-Apr-05 20-Apr-05 26-Apr-05 04-May-05 12-May-05 19-May-05 23-May-05 31-May-05 07-Jun-05 13-Jun-05 20-Jun-05 27-Jun-05 H08 H12<0.04 <0.04<0.02 <0.02<0.01 <0.01<0.01 <0.01<0.01 <0.01<0.01 <0.01<0.02 <0.02<0.01 <0.02<0.01 <0.01<0.03 <0.03<0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02<0.02 <0.02 H14 H30<0.04<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.04<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02 H34<0.04<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.02<0.03 (A)<0.02 (A) Power outage due to flipped breaker. Run time estimated at 81 hours9.375e-4 days <br />0.0225 hours <br />1.339286e-4 weeks <br />3.08205e-5 months <br /> out of 167.3 of7 i o6 SL QR 2Q-2005 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA -(pCi/m 3)Sample Site Collection Date 05-Apr-05 11-Apr-05 20-Apr-05 26-Apr-05 04-May-05 12-May-05 19-May-05 23-May-05 31-May-05 07-Jun-05 13-Jun-05 20-Jun-05 27-Jun-05 H08 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.003 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.003 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/-0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.002 H12 0.014 +/- 0.003 0.020 +/- 0.003 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.029 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.003 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.001 H14 0.017 +/- 0.003 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.003 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 H30 0.015 +/- 0.003 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.004 +/- 0.001 H34 0.013 i 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.029 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.009 t 0.003 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.003 0.005 +/- 0.002 (A) Power outage due to flipped breaker. Run time estimated at 81 hours9.375e-4 days <br />0.0225 hours <br />1.339286e-4 weeks <br />3.08205e-5 months <br /> out of 167.2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m 3)Second Quarter, 2005 Sample Site H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 Be-7 0.1518 +/- 0.0103 0.1822 +/- 0.0118 0.1690 +/- 0.0117 0.1897 +/- 0.0111 0.1705 +/- 0.0109 K-40<0.0226<0.0215<0.0224<0.0202<0.0172 Cs-134<0.001 1<0.0009<0.0010<0.0014<0.0012 Cs-1 37<0.0008<0.0009<0.0007<0.0009<0.001 1 Pb-210 0.0207 +/- 0.0034 0.0191 +/- 0.0049 0.0308 +/- 0.0044 0.0245 +/- 0.0050 0.0297 +/- 0.0039 4 of 7 SL QR 2Q-2005 II 3.a. SURFACE WATER -(OCi/L)Sample Collection Site Date Zr-95 H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 1-131 (A)Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (B)H15 05-Apr-05

<136 315 +/- 40 <5 11 -Apr-05 <136 272 +/- 38 <3 20-Apr-05

<142 382 +/- 17 <2 26-Apr-05

<142 349 +/- 29 <2 04-May-05

<136 383 +/- 29 <3 12-May-05

<135 378 +/- 35 <3 19-May-05

<145 412 +/- 37 <3 23-May-05

<145 378 +/- 27 <3 31-May-05

<145 316 +/- 28 <3 07-Jun-05

<145 417 +/- 37 <4 13-Jun-05

<145 320 +/- 32 <3 20-Jun-05

<133 346 +/- 30 <3 27-Jun-05

<132 308 +/- 38 <3 H59 05-Apr-05

<136 364 +/- 38 <4 12-May-05

<135 381 +/- 17 <1 07-Jun-05

<145 352 +/- 34 <3<4<3<1<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<2<2<3<2<3<9 <5<7 <4<3 <2<6 <3<5 <3<7 <5<6 <4<6 <3<6 <4<6 <4<7 <5<6 <3<6 <4<8 <4<3 <2<7 <4<11<6<4<7<7<8<7<7<6<7<6<6<9<7<3<6<8<5<3<5<5<7<6<3<4<6<5<4<6<6<3<5<5 <6 <5 <12<4 <4 <4 <7<2 <2 <2 <4<3 <3 <3 <9<3 <3 <3 <9<5 <3 <4 <6<3 <4 <3 <11<3 <3 <3 <5<3 <3 <3 <6<4 <3 <4 <7<4 <4 <3 <12<3 <3 <3 <9<4 <4 <4 <8<4 <4 <3 <8<2 <2 <2 <2<4 <5 <3 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.5 of 7 SL QR 2Q-2005 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT -(DCi/ka. dryweight)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 These samples were previously collected.

Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA

-(pCi/kq. wet weight)Sample Site H15 H59 Collection Date 23-Apr-04 K-40 1481 +/- 104 Mn-54<10 Co-58<10 Fe-59<22 Co-60<11 Zn-65<20 Cs-134<11 Cs-137<10 Ra-226<190 Ra-228<37 This sample was previously collected.

4.a.2. FISH -(pCi/kq. wet weiaht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 These samples were previously collected.

Ra-228 6 of 7

-j SL QR 2Q-2005 V.4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Pepper -(PCi/kQ. wet weiaht)Sample Site H51 H52 H59 Collection Date 05-Apr-05 12-May-05 07-Jun-05 05-Apr-05 12-May-05 07-Jun-05 05-Apr-05 12-May-05 07-Jun-05 Be-7 452 +/- 65 767 +/- 83 968 +/- 89 597 +/- 77 778 +/- 74 822 +/- 68 505 +/- 65 659 +/- 84 K-40 1-131 5746 +/- 187 4498 +/- 224 4402 +/- 209 4933 +/- 229 5123 +/- 247 3542 +/- 211 6025 +/- 238 2482 +/- 162<17<20<14<20<23<14<18<18<16 Cs-1 34<11<20<15<17<16<18<18<14<18 Cs-1 37<10<22<12<18<15<13<18<14<16 Pb-210 Pb-212<615<2278<2216<2266<2553<2127<2383<2003<2128<92<79<78<71<80<69<82<65<82 Ra-226<262<311<321<332<358<331<338<292<345 1456 +/-89 4062 +/- 223 4.c. MILK -(DCi/L)Sample Site Collection Date K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 (A)H101 There was no sample available during the quarter.(A) This tabulated LLD value is for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity.

7 of 7 a SL QR 3Q-2005 ST. LUCIE SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Specification Sampling Third Quarter, 2005 Collection Frequency Locations Sampled Number of Samples Sample Tvpe 1. Direct Radiation 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates Quarterly 27 27 Weekly Weekly 5 5 65 65 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 1 1 2 13 3 2 2 2 3 1 9 Total: 186 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background and with greater than.a 50% error term are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection

(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.I of 8 fi i SL QR 3Q-2005 1. DIRECT RADIATION

-TLDs .(uR/hour)-Sample Site N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-l0 Deployment 08-Jun-05 Collection 13-Sep-05 4.8t +/-0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3 5.2 +/- 0.4 5.0 +/- 0.3 6.4 +/- 0.4 4.8 + 0.3 5.0 +/- 0.3 5.8 +/- 0.4 4.8 +/- 0.3 5.2 +/- 0.4 5.2 +/- 0.4 5.0 +/- 0.3 4.9 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3-Sample Site SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-lo S-5 S-10 S/SSE-l 0 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 H-32 Deployment 08-Jun-05 Collection 13-Sep-05 5.0 +/- 0.3 6.2 +/- 0.4 5.2 +/- 0.3 4.9+/-0.3 5.9 +/- 0.4 5.8 +/- 0.4 5.1 +/- 0.3 5.3 +/- 0.4 4.9 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.3 5.9 +/- 0.4 5.0 +/- 0.3 5.7 +/- 0.4 2 of 8

0'SL QR 3Q-2005 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-(DCi/ M 3)Collection Date 06-Jul-05 13-Jul-05 20-Jul-05 25-Jul-05 01-Aug-05 09-Aug-05 18-Aug-05 24-Aug-05 30-Aug-05 06-Sep-05 13-Sep-05 20-Sep-05 27-Sep-05 H08<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01 H12<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01 H14<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01 H30<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01 H34<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01 3 of 8 a, SL QR 3Q-2005 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA -(pCi/m 3);- -Sample Site Collection Date 06-Jul-05 13-Jul-05 20-Jul-05 25-Jul-05 01-Aug-05 09-Aug-05 18-Aug-05 24-Aug-05 30-Aug-05 06-Sep-05 13-Sep-05 20-Sep-05 27-Sep-05 Mean:-H08 H12 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.012 i 0.002 0.016 i 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.006 i 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.003 0.014 + 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.001 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.029 +/- 0.003 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 0.013 +/- 0.001 H14 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.004 +/- 0.002 0.025 +/- 0.003 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.030 +/- 0.003 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 H30 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.001 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.001 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.001 H34 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.001 4 of 8 47 SL QR 3Q-2005 2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m 3)Third Quarter. 2005 Sample Site H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 Be-7 0.1478 +/- 0.0114 0.1483 +/- 0.0110 0.1137 +/- 0.0112 0.1074 +/- 0.0106 0.1425 +/- 0.0141 K-40<0.0226<0.0221<0.0193<0.0183<0.0243 Cs-134<0.0013<0.0008<0.0008<0.0007<0.0010 Cs-137<0.0007<0.0009<0.0008<0.0008<0.0014 Pb-210 0.0232 +/- 0.0038 0.0173 +/- 0.0039 0.0298 +/- 0.0047 0.0251 +/- 0.0042<0.0561 5 of 8 of, SL QR 3Q-2005 3.a. SURFACE WATER -(gCi/L)Sample Collection Site Date H-3 Zr-95 Ba-140 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)H15 06-Jul-05 13-Jul-05 20-Jul-05 25-Jul-05 01-Aug-05 10-Aug-05 I8-Aug-05 24-Aug-O5 30-Aug-05 06-Sep-05 13-Sep-05 20-Sep-05 27-Sep-05 H59 13-Jul-05 10-Aug-05 06-Sep-05<132 345 +/- 23 <2<138 288 +/- 32 <3<138 379 +/- 32 <3<137 363 +/- 23 <2<148 350 +/ <5<147 425 +/- 36 <3<142 257 +/- 32 <3<142 343 +/- 30 <3<145 355 +/- 33 <4<140 346 +/- 34 <3<144 306 +/- 31 <3<156 322 +/- 32 <3<156 376 +/- 38 <3<138 394 +/- 44 <6<142 424 +/- 33 <3<144 262 +/- 48 <5<2<3<3<2<6<3<3<3<4<3<4<3<4<5<3<5<5<9<7<5<9<9<6<5<6<6<6<7<7<12<7<9<2 <5 <4<4 <8 <6<3 <8 <6<3 <5 <4<5 <12 <11<4 <8 <6<4 <7 <6<4 <7 <4<4 <8 <5<4 <8 <6<4 <8 <6<3 <6 <5<4 <7 <6<7 <13 <10<4 <9 <6<6 <10 <7<2<5<4<3<5<5<3<4<4<4<3<4<5<7<6<5<3 <3 <6<4 <4 <4<4 <3 <7<3 <2 <5<6 <5 <12<4 :<4 <7<4 <3 <10<3 <3 <9<4 <4 <6<4 <3 <8<4 <4 <6<4 <3 <11<4 <4 <6<6 <5 <9<4 <4 <6<5 <5 <9 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.6 of 8 SL QR 3Q-2005 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT -(oCi/k. drlyweight)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 H15 10-Aug-05

<101 490+/-84 <11 <10 <12 <13 <1016 299+/-14 96+/-15 411 +/-101 H59 10-Aug-05 93+/-40 208+/-45 <7 <7 <9 <8 <456 <253 65 +/- 11 <416 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA

-(cCi/kg. wet weight)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 13-Sep-05 839 +/- 358 <42 <53 <108 <60 <116 <48 <51 <857 <180 H59 This sample has not yet been collected.

4.a.2. FISH -(pCi/ka. wet weight)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 13-Sep-05 2368 +/- 182 <19 <17 <27 <20 <37 <21 <16 <390 <64 H59 This sample has not yet been collected.

7 of 8 SL QR 3Q-2005 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Penner -(oCi/ka. wet weight)Sample Site H51 H52 H59 Collection Date 13-Jul-05 10-Aug-05 06-Sep-05 13-Jul-05 10-Aug-05 06-Sep-05 13-Jul-05 10-Aug-05 06-Sep-05 Be-7 585 +/-42 1242 +/- 94 708 +/- 77 563 +/- 68 801 +/- 80 539 +/- 78 655 +/- 83 1224 +/- 87 1421 +/-76 K-40 1-131 4775 113 <10 4698 +/-232 <17 3699 +/-208 <14 3882 +/- 198 <20 3974 +/-209 <14 4557 +/- 175 <11 3721 +/- 208 <26 4062 +/- 198 <15 3840 +/- 163 <11 Cs-134<8<17<14<15<15<11<16<14<10 Cs-1 37<7<15<17<12<15 14 +/- 5<17<15<12 Pb-210<1077<2385<2079<1842<2450<679<2201<2195<674 Pb-212<37<82<77<60<70<83<78<68<84 Ra-226 210 +/- 75<358<365<253 403 +/- 158<248<345<326<261 8 of 8 SL QR 4Q-2005 ST. LUCIE SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 2005 Number of Samples Sample Type Collection Frequency Locations Sampled 1. Direct Radiation 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates Quarterly 27 27 Weekly Weekly 5 5 65 63 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water 3.b. Shoreline Sediment 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea 4.a.2. Fish 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation 4.c. Milk Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly Quarterly 1 0 13 3 0 I I 3 1 I 9 0 Total: 182 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection

(<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity In the sample.The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.1 of 7 SL QR 4Q-2005 1. DIRECT RADIATION

-TLDs -(uR/hour)Sample Site N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 Deployment 13-Sep-05 Collection 08-Dec-05 4.9 +/- 0.2 4.8 +/- 0.2 5.0 +/- 0.2 4.6 +/- 0.2 6.5 +/- 0.3 5.0 +/- 0.2 5.4 +/- 0.3 5.5 +/- 0.3 4.7 +/- 0.2 5.4 +/- 0.3 4.9 +/- 0.2 5.2 +/- 0.2 5.2 +/- 0.2 4.7 +/- 0.2 Sample Site SW-2 SW-5 SW-1o SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-1o S-5 S-10 S/SSE-1 0 SSE-5 SSE-1 0 SE-1 H-32 Deployment 13-Sep-05 Collection 08-Dec-05 5.0 +/- 0.2 5.9 +/- 0.3 5.3 +/- 0.2 5.0 +/- 0.2 6.0 +/- 0.3 5.8 +/- 0.3 5.2 +/- 0.2 5.0 +/- 0.2 4.8 +/- 0.2 4.4 +/- 0.2 5.6 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.2 5.4 +/- 0.3 2of7 SL QR 4Q-2005 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES

-(pCi/ M 3)Collection Date 05-Oct-05 12-Oct-05 19-Oct-05 25-Oct-05 H08<0.01<0.02<0.01 H12 H14 H30 H34<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02 (A) <0.01 (B) <0.02 (C) <0.02 (D) <0.02 (E) <0.02 (F) <0.02 03-Nov-05 09-Nov-05 15-Nov-05 22-Nov-05 28-Nov-05 05-Dec-05 14-Dec-05 21-Dec-05 28-Dec-05 Power off at time<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02 (G) <0.01 (H) <0.01 (I) <0.01<0.01<0.01<0.0i<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.02<0.02<0.01<0.01<0.02 (A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F)(G)(H)(I)of collection, run time 164.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> out of 168.3.Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 129 hours0.00149 days <br />0.0358 hours <br />2.132936e-4 weeks <br />4.90845e-5 months <br /> out of 150.Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 140 hours0.00162 days <br />0.0389 hours <br />2.314815e-4 weeks <br />5.327e-5 months <br /> out of 146.Hurricane Wilma, power outage run time 117 hours0.00135 days <br />0.0325 hours <br />1.934524e-4 weeks <br />4.45185e-5 months <br /> out of 144.Hurricane Wilma, power outage run time 121 hours0.0014 days <br />0.0336 hours <br />2.000661e-4 weeks <br />4.60405e-5 months <br /> of of 147.Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 109 hours0.00126 days <br />0.0303 hours <br />1.802249e-4 weeks <br />4.14745e-5 months <br /> out of 142.Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 107 hours0.00124 days <br />0.0297 hours <br />1.76918e-4 weeks <br />4.07135e-5 months <br /> out of 220.Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 118 hours0.00137 days <br />0.0328 hours <br />1.951058e-4 weeks <br />4.4899e-5 months <br /> out of 216.Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 204 hours0.00236 days <br />0.0567 hours <br />3.373016e-4 weeks <br />7.7622e-5 months <br /> out of 223.3 of 7 A &SL QR 4Q-2005 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA -(pCVM 3)~ 4t Sample Sit-Collection Date 05-Oct-O!1 2-Oct-O 1 9-Oct-O 25-Oct-O 03-Nov-0 09-Nov-0 15-Nov-0 22-Nov-0 28-Nov-0 05-Dec-0 14-Dec-0 21-Dec-0 28-Dec-0 Mean: (A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F)(G)(H)(I)5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 H08 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 (B) <0.009 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002<0.014 H12 0.008 +/- 0.001 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 (C) 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.003 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.028 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.001 H14 H30 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 (D) (E)(G) 0.010 +/- 0.003 (H) 0.016 +/- 0.003 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.028 +/- 0.003<0.014 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.003 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.002<0.015 H34 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 (A) 0.014 +/- 0.002 (F) 0.007 +/- 0.002 (I) 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.003 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.001 Power off at time of collection, run time 164.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> out of 168.3.Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 129 hours0.00149 days <br />0.0358 hours <br />2.132936e-4 weeks <br />4.90845e-5 months <br /> out of 150.Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 140 hours0.00162 days <br />0.0389 hours <br />2.314815e-4 weeks <br />5.327e-5 months <br /> out of 146.Hurricane Wilma, particulate filter lost.Hurricane Wilma, particulate filter lost.Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 109 hours0.00126 days <br />0.0303 hours <br />1.802249e-4 weeks <br />4.14745e-5 months <br /> out of 142.Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 107 hours0.00124 days <br />0.0297 hours <br />1.76918e-4 weeks <br />4.07135e-5 months <br /> out of 220.Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 118 hours0.00137 days <br />0.0328 hours <br />1.951058e-4 weeks <br />4.4899e-5 months <br /> out of 216.Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 204 hours0.00236 days <br />0.0567 hours <br />3.373016e-4 weeks <br />7.7622e-5 months <br /> out of 223.2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (PCi/m 3)Fourth Quarter, 2005 Sample Site H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 Be-7 0.1382 +/-0.0129 0.1534 +/- 0.0147 K-40<0.0222 Cs-134<0.001 3 Cs-137<0.001 1 Pb-21 0<0.0563-<0.0586<0.0254 <0.0015 <0.0011 0.1741 +/-0.0123 <0.0230 <0.0011 <0.0005 0.0282+/-0.0034 0.1644+/-0.0114

<0.0179 <0.0009 <0.0009 0.0282+/-0.0048 0.1891 +/-0.0123 <0.0154 <0.0008 <0.0007 0.0293+/-0.0040 4of7 SL QR 4Q-2005 3.a. SURFACE WATER -(DCi/L)Sample Collection Zr-95 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 (A)Ba-140 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (B)H15 05-Oct-05 118+/-50 379+/-35 <3 12-Oct-05

<144 387 +/- 33 <3 19-Oct-05 110+/-46 351 +/-27 <3 25-Oct-05

<144 365 +/- 34 <4 03-Nov-05

<157 382 +/- 32 <4 09-Nov-05

<157 294 +/- 20 <2 15-Nov-05

<157 321 +/-25 <3 22-Nov-05

<157 384 +/- 29 <3 28-Nov-05

<156 322 +/- 27 <3 05-Dec-05

<149 362 +/- 40 <4 14-Dec-05

<149 358 +/- 32 <3 21-Dec-05

<149 266 +/- 34 <4 28-Dec-05

<148 416 +/- 30 <3 H59 05-Oct-05

' <144 361 +/-35 <4 03-Nov-05 142 +/- 51 285 +/- 25 <3 05-Dec-05

<149 347 +/- 39 <4<3<4<2<3<3<2<3<3<2<5<3<3<3<3<2<5<9<6<5<6<7<4<6<6<5<8<7<6<7<7<5<9<4<4<3<4<4<2<3<3<3<7<4<3<3<5<3<5<10<8<6<9<8<4<6<7<6<11<7<6<6<7<5<8<6<5<5<6<7<3<5<6<4<9<7<5<5<6<4<8<5<5<3<5<5<3<3<4<3<5<4<3<4<6<3<5<4<3<3<3<4<2<3<3<3<5<4<3<4<4<2<5<4 <6<3 <6<3 <11<5 <7<4 <6<2 <3<3 <6<3 <10<3 <5<5 <7<4 <7<4 <8<3 -<9<3 <5<3 <3<4 <6 ft (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.5 of 7 SL QR 4Q-2005 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT -(DCi/ct. dry weight)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 These samples were previously collected.

Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA

-(nCi/ka. wet weight)Sample Site H15 H59 Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 This sample was previously collected.

06-Oct-05 1830 +/- 96 <11 <11 <24 <12 <25 <12 <12 Ra-226 Ra-228<247 121 +/- 35 4.a.2. FISH -(oCi/ka. wet weight)Sample Site H15 H59 Collection Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 This sample was previously collected.

09-Nov-05 1838 +/- 226 <23 <26 <59 <31 <57 <28 <30 Ra-226 Ra-228<488<100 6 of 7 SL QR 4Q-2005 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Brazilian Petper -(DCi/kq. wet weight)Sample Collection Site Date H51 05-Oct-05 03-Nov-05 08-Dec-05 H52 05-Oct-05 03-Nov-05 05-Dec-05 H59 05-Oct-05 03-Nov-05 05-Dec-05 Be-7 1140 +/- 109 897 +/-68 706 +/-40 968 +/- 88 934 +/- 71 775 +/- 88 1946+/-54 683 +/- 41 1034 +/- 77 K-40 4297 +/- 257 3829 +/- 179 3922 +/- 104 3233 +/- 195 3886 +/- 174 4168 +/- 211 2703 +/- 93 3852 +/- 103 3380 +/- 194 1-131<23<12<7<22<13<17<10<6<17 Cs-134<19<15<7<17<13<19<9<8<19 Cs-1 37<21<13<8<17<11<16<8<8<14 Pb-210<2675<1956<1102<2201<671<2213<1177<1123<2029 Pb-212 Ra-226<94 <440<72 <267<36 <170<74 <359<79 <248<90 <300<37 <144<38 <166<74 <361 7 of 7

66. i 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 2005 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MAPEP 13, June 2005 AND MAPEP 14, December 2005

-'q I , 1 -q. 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT- UNITS 1 & 2 DOE-MAPEP 13 RESULTS-Result Radionuclide Matrix: RdF Air Filter Bq/filter MN54 3.61 C057 5.01 C060 3.10 ZN65 3.63 CS134 2.94 CS137 2.44 Am-241 0.12 Matrix: GrF Air Filter Bq/filter Gross Beta 0.35 Matrix: MaS Soil Bq/kg K40 708 MN54 593 C057 293 C060 239 ZN65 992 CS134 763 CS137 368 U238 295 AM241 137 Matrix: MaW Water Bq/L H3 302.8 MN54 334.2 C057 223.3 C060 251.9 ZN65 553.0 CS134 114.7 CS137 325.6 AM241 1.8 Ref. Flag Value (Evaluation)

Acceptance Ranae 3.330 4.920 3.030 3.140 3.510 2.260 0.102 A A A A A A A 0.297 604 485 242 212 810 759 315 249 109 280 331 227 251 496 127 332 1.72 A A W W A W A A A W A A A A A A A A 2.33 -4.33 3.44 -6.40 2.12 -3.94 2.20 -4.08 2.46 -4.56 1.58 -2.94 0.07 -0.13 0.15 -0.45 422.8 -785.2 339.5 -630.5 169.4 -314.6 148.4 -275.6 567.0- 1053 531.3 -986.7 220.5 -409.5 174.3 -323.70 76.30- 141.70 196.0 -364.0 231.7 -430.3 158.9 -295.1 175.7 -326.3 347.2 -644.8 88.90 -165.1 232.4 -431.6 1.200 -2.240 Matrix: RdV Vegetation, Bq/sample MN54 4.00 C057 5.90 C060 2.38 ZN65 CS134 CS137 AM241 5.20 3.39 3.00 0.15 5.180 9.880 3.150 6.290 5.000 4.110 0.145 A W A A A A A 3.63 -6.73 6.92 -12.84 2.21 -4.10 4.40 -9.18 3.50 -6.50 2.88 -5.34 0.10 -0.19 Evaluation:

A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warning, N = Not Acceptable

, r , , j ' -6 'S 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 DOE-MAPEP 14 Result Ref.-Radionuclide Matrix: RdF Air Filter Bq/filter MN54 5.0 C057 6.48 C060 2.96 ZN65 5.07 CS134 4.04 CS137 3.55 AM241 0.18 Matrix: GrF Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 0.95 Value Matrix: MaS Soil Bq/kg K40 MN54 C057 C060 ZN65 CS134 CS137 Matrix: MaW Water Bq/676 506 617 307 948 570 499/L 4.37 6.2 2.85 4.33 3.85 3.23 0.158 0.827 604 439 524 287 823 568 439 527 418 272 261 100 330 8.98 167 333 6.57 13.3 4.43 10.2 4.09 5A3 0.23 RESULTS Flag (Evaluation)

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A N N N N A N N 3.06 -5.68 4.34 -8.06 2.00 -3.71 3.03 -5.63 2.70 -5.01 2.26 -4.20 0.11 -0.21 0.55- 1.22 422.8 -785.2 307.3 -570.7 366.8 -681.2 200.9 -373.1 576.1 -1070.0 397.6 -738.4 307.3 -570.7 368.9 -685.1 292.6 -543.4 190.4 -353.6 182.7 -339.3 70.0- 130.0 231.0- 429.0 6.29 -11.67 116.9 -217.1 233.1 -432.9 Acceptance Range H3 556.4 MN54 420.7 C057 266.2 C060 261.0 N163 101.3 ZN65 351.5 SR90 9.9 CS134 166.9 CS137 326.4 Matrix: MaV Vegetation, Bq/sample MN54 3.96 C057 5.9 C060 2.38 ZN65 5.2 CS134 3.81 CS137 3.00 AM241 0.15 4.6 -8.54 9.31 -17.29 3.1 -5.76 7.14- 13.26 2.86 -5.32 3.80 -7.06 0.16 -0.30 Reanalysis 6.00 A 9.18 N 3.91 A 9.7 A 3.75 A 4.74 A 0.26 A From the MAPEP handbook: Acceptance criteria were developed from a review of precision and accuracy data compiled by other PEPs, the analytical methods literature, from several MAPEP pilot studies, and from what is considered reasonable, acceptable, and achievable for routine analyses among the more experienced laboratories.