Text

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
	ML11137A167
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	05/11/2011
From:	Hanley T; Exelon Nuclear, Exelon Generation Co
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	SVP-11-042
	Download: ML11137A167 (128)
	v • d • e

Exelon.Exelon Generation Company, LLC www.exeloncorp.com Nuclear Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206" Avenue North Cordova, IL 61242-9740 SVP-1 1-042 May 11, 2011 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265

Subject:

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Pursuant to Technical Specifications Section 5.6.2, enclosed is the 2010 Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station. This report contains the results of the radiological environmental and meteorological monitoring programs.

In addition, the 2010 Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP)Report is included as Appendix E of the enclosure.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Wally J. Beck at (309) 227-2800.Respectfully, Tim Hanley Site Vice President Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station

Enclosure:

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report cc: Regional Administrator

-NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector

-Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Enclosure Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Docket No: 50-254 50-265 QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1 and 2 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1 January Through 31 December 2010 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Exelkn C Nuclear Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Cordova, IL 61242 May 2011 1 of 126 Intentionally left blank 2 of 126 Table Of Contents I. Sum m ary and Conclusions

..............................................................................................

1 II. Introduction

.............................................................................................................

3 A. O bjectives of the REM P ..................................................................................

3 B. Im plem entation of the O bjectives

..................................................................

3 II1. Program Description

................................................................................................

3 A. Sam ple Collection

...........................................................................................

3 B. Sam ple Analysis ..............................................................................................

5 C. Data Interpretation

.........................................................................................

6 D. Program Exceptions

.......................................................................................

7 E. Program Changes .........................................................................................

10 IV. Results and Discussion

.........................................................................................

11 A. Aquatic Environm ent .....................................................................................

11 1. Surface W ater .....................................................................................

11 2. G round W ater .....................................................................................

11 3. Fish .....................................................................................................

12 4. Sedim ent ............................................................................................

12 B. Atm ospheric Environm ent ...........................................................................

12 1. Airborne ..............................................................................................

12 a. Air Particulates

.........................................................................

12 b. Airborne Iodine ........................................................................

13 2. Terrestrial

............................................................................................

13a. M ilk ..........................................................................................

13 b. Food Products .........................................................................

14 C. Am bient G am m a Radiation

...........................................................................

14 D. Independent Spent Fuel Storage ..................................................................

14 E. Land Use Survey ..........................................................................................

15 F. Errata Data

..................................................................................................

15 G. Summary of Results -Inter-laboratory Comparison Program .....................

15 3 of 126 AppendicesAppendix A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary Tables Table A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010Appendix B Tables Table B-1 Table B-2 Location Designation, Distance & Direction, and Sample Collection

&Analytical Methods Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations,Distance and Direction, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Figures Figure B-1 Figure B-2Appendix C Tables Table C-1.1 Table C-1.2 Table C-1.3 Table C-11.1 Table C-11.2 Quad Cities REMP Sampling Locations-2 Mile Radius, 2010 Quad Cities REMP Sampling Locations -

9.3 Mile Radius, 2010 Data Tables and Figures -Primary Laboratory Concentrations of Gross Beta in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Tritium in Ground Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Ground Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.ii 4 of 126 Table C-I11.1 Table C-IV.1 Table C-V.1 Table C-V.2 Table C-V.3 Table C-VI.1 Table C-VII.1 Table C-VII.2 Table C-VIII.1 Table C-IX.1 Table C-IX.2 Table C-IX.3 Fi~gures Figure C-1 Figure C-2 Figure C-3 Figure C-4 Figure C-5 Figure C-6 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fish Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations In Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of 1-131 in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Food Products Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Quarterly TLD Results for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Mean Quarterly TLD Results for the Inner Ring, Outer Ring, Other and Control Location for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Surface Water

-Gross Beta -Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C) Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000

-2010.Surface Water -Tritium -Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C) Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 -2010.Ground Water -Tritium -Station Q-35 and Q-36 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000

-2010.Air Particulates

-Gross Beta -Stations Q-01 and Q-02 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 -2010.Air Particulates

-Gross Beta -Stations Q-03 and Q-04 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000

-2010.Air Particulates

-Gross Beta -Station Q-07 (C) Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 -2010.iii 5 of 126 Figure C-7 Figure C-8 Figure C-9 Appendix D Air Particulates

-Gross Beta -Stations Q-13 and Q-16 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 -2010.Air Particulates

-Gross Beta -Stations Q-37 and Q-38 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 -2010.Air Particulates

-Gross Beta -Stations Q-41 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2009 -2010.Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Tables Table D-1 Table D-2 Table D-3 Table D-4 Table D-5 Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2010 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2010 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2010 ERA Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, Inc., 2010 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)Environmental, Inc., 2010 Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report (ARGPPR)Appendix E iv 6 of 126 I. Summary and Conclusions In 2010, the Quad Cities Generating Station released to the environment through the radioactive effluent liquid and gaseous pathways approximately 402 curies of noble gas, fission and activation products and approximately 98 curies of tritium.The dose from both liquid and gaseous effluents was conservatively calculated for the Maximum Exposed Member of the Public. The results of those calculations and their comparison to the allowable limits were as follows: Gaseous and liquid radiation doses to members of the public at locations Applicable Estimated Age Location % of Site Unit Effluents Organ Dose Group Distance Direction Applicable Limit (meters) (toward) Limit Noble Gas Gamma -Air Dose 2.32E-03 All 1029 NNE 1.16E-02 20 mRad Noble Gas Beta -Air Dose 1.27E-03 All 1029 NNE 3.18E-03 40 mRad Noble Gas Total Body (Gamma) 4.30E-02 Child 1029 NNE 4.30E-01 10 mrem Iodine, Particulate

& Thyroid 1.32E+00 Infant 1029 NNE 4.40E+00 30 mrem Tritium Liquid Total Body 5.72E-03 Adult RDT via South Diffuser 9.53E-02 6 mrem Liquid Liver 1.05E-02 Teen RDT via South Diffuser 5.25E-02 20 mremTotal Body

-Direct 7.43E+00 All 800 N 2.97E+01 25 mrem 40CFR190 Radiation The doses as a result of the radiological effluents released from the Quad Cities Generating Station were a very small percentage of the allowable limits, with the exception of 40CFR190 direct radiation which was calculated to be 29.7% of the 25 mrem/yr limit.This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)conducted for the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (QCNPS) by Exelon covers the period 01 January 2010 through 31 December 2010. During that time period, 1,425 analyses were performed on 1,519 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with preoperational data, it was concluded that the operation of QCNPS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment.Surface water samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, tritium and gamma emitting nuclides.

Ground water samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides.

No fission or activation products were detected.

Gross beta activities detected were consistent with those detected in previous years and consistent with the control stations.Fish (commercially and recreationally important species) and sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides.

No fission or-1 -7 of 126 activation products were detected in fish. A small concentration of Cs-1 37 was found in one of four sediment samples. Occasionally Cs-1 37 is detected at very low levels (just above LLD) and is not distinguishable from background levels.No other fission products or activation products were found in sediment.Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta and gamma emitting nuclides.

No fission or activation products were detected.High sensitivity 1-131 analyses were performed on air samples. No 1-131 was detected.Cow milk samples were analyzed for concentrations of 1-131 and gamma emitting nuclides.

No 1-131 was detected.

Concentrations of naturally occurring isotopes were consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected.Food product samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides.

No fission or activation products were detected.Environmental gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly using thermoluminescent dosimeters.

Levels detected were consistent with those observed in previous years.-2-8 of 126 II. IntroductionThe Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (QCNPS), consisting of two 2957 MWth boiling water reactors owned and operated by Exelon Corporation, is located in Cordova, Illinois along the Mississippi River. Unit No. 1 went critical on 16 March 1972. Unit No. 2 went critical on 02 December 1973. The site is located in northern Illinois, approximately 182 miles west of Chicago, Illinois.This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE), Mirion Technologies, and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected during the period 1 January 2010 through 31 December 2010.A. Objective of the REMP The objectives of the REMP are to:1. Provide data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive materials in the site environs.

2. Evaluate the relationship between quantities of radioactive material released from the plant and resultant radiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure.B. Implementation of the Objectives The implementation of the objectives is accomplished by: 1. Identifying significant exposure pathways.2. Establishing baseline radiological data of media within those pathways.3. Continuously monitoring those media before and during Station operation to assess Station radiological effects (if any) on man and the environment.

Ill. Program Description A. Sample Collection Samples for the QCNPS REMP were collected for Exelon Nuclear by Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs). This section describes the general sampling methods used by Environmental Inc. to obtain environmental samples for the QCNPS REMP in 2010. Sample locations anddescriptions can be found in Table B-1 and Figures B-1 and B-2,-3-9 of 126 Appendix B.Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, ground water, fish, and sediment.Surface water samples were collected weekly from two locations, Q-33 and Q-34 (Control).

Ground water samples were collected quarterly from two locations, Q-35 and Q-36. All water samples were collected in new containers, which were rinsed with source water prior to collection.

Fish samples comprising the edible portions of commercially and recreationally important species were collected semiannually at two locations, Q-24 and Q-29 (Control).

Sediment samples composed of recently deposited substrate were collected at two locations semiannually, Q-39 and Q-40 (Control).

Atmospheric Environment The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of air particulate, airborne iodine, and milk. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were collected and analyzed at ten locations (Q-01, Q-02, Q-03, Q-04, Q-07, Q-13, Q-16, Q-37, Q-38, and Q-41). The control location was Q-07. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were obtained at each location, using a vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filters attached.

The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of approximately one cubic foot per minute. The air particulate filters and air iodine samples were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.Milk samples were collected biweekly at one location (Q-26) from May through October, and monthly from November through April. All samples were collected in new plastic containers from the bulk tank, preserved with sodium bisulfite, and shipped promptly to the laboratory.

Food products were collected annually in July at five locations (Q-Quad 1 Control, Q-Quad 1, Q-Quad 2, Q-Quad 3, and Q-Quad 4). The control location was Q-Quad 1 -Control. Various types of broadleaf and root vegetables were collected and placed in new plastic bags, and sent to the laboratory for analysis.Ambient Gamma Radiation Direct radiation measurements were made using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). Each location consisted of 2 TLD sets. The TLD locations were placed on and around the QCNPS site as follows:-4-10 of 126 An inner ring consisting of 15 locations (Q-101, Q-102, Q-103, Q-104, Q-105, Q-106, Q-107, Q-108, Q-109, Q-111, Q-112, Q-113, Q-114, Q-115 and Q-116). These TLD are located in 15 of the 16 meteorological sectors in the general area of the site boundary (approximately 0.1 -3 miles from the site). There are no TLDs located in the SSW sector because this sector is located over water.An outer ring consisting of 16 locations (Q-201, Q-202, Q-203, Q-204, Q-205, Q-206, Q-207, Q-208, Q-209, Q-210, Q-211, Q-212, Q-213, Q-214, Q-215 and Q-216). These TLDs are located in each of the 16 meteorological sectors (approximately 6.0 -8.0 km from the site)An other set consisting of nine locations (Q-01, Q-02, Q-03, Q-04, Q-13, Q-16, Q-37, Q-38 and Q-41). The locations are at each of the air sample stations around the site.The balance of one location (Q-07) is the control site.The specific TLD locations were determined by the following criteria: 1. The presence of relatively dense population;

2. Site meteorological data taking into account distance and elevation for each of the sixteen 22 1/2 degree sectors around the site, where estimated annual dose from QCNPS, if any, would be most significant;

3. On hills free from local obstructions and within sight of the stack (where practical);

4. Near the closest dwelling to the stack in the prevailing downwind direction.

The TLDs were exchanged quarterly and sent to Mirion Technologies for analysis.B. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the QCNPS REMP in 2010 and the type of analyses.

The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table B-2.In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses:-5-11 of 126

1. Concentrations of beta emitters in surface water and air particulates.

2. Concentrations of gamma emitters in ground and surface water, air particulates, milk, fish, sediment and vegetation.

3. Concentrations of tritium in ground and surface water.4. Concentrations of 1-131 in air and milk.5. Ambient gamma radiation levels at various site environs.C. Data Interpretation The radiological and direct radiation data collected prior to Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station becoming operational were used as a baseline with which these operational data were compared.

For the purpose of this report, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station was considered operational at initial criticality.

In addition, data were compared to previous years'operational data for consistency and trending. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data: 1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) was defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD was intended as an a priori (a before the fact) estimate of a system (including instrumentation,procedure and sample type) and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) criteria for the presence of activity.

All analyses were designed to achieve the required QCNPS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an a posteriori (after the fact) estimate of the presence of activity.2. Net Activity Calculation and Reportinq of ResultsNet activity for a sample was calculated by subtracting backgroundactivity from the sample activity.

Since the REMP measures extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background variations may result in sample activity being lower than the background activity effecting a negative number. An MDC-6-12 of 126 was reported in all cases where positive activity was not detected.Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows: For surface water, groundwater and vegetation 12 nuclides, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-140 were reported.For fish, sediment, air particulate and milk 11 nuclides, Mn-54,Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Nb-95, Zr-95, Cs-134, Cs-137 and Ba-140 and La-140 were reported.

For air iodine, one nuclide, 1-131 was reportedMeans and standard deviations of the results were calculated.

The standard deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than single analysis uncertainty.

D. Program Exceptions For 2010 the QCNPS REMP had a sample recovery rate in excess of 99%. Sample anomalies and missed samples are listed in the tables below: Table D-1 LISTING OF SAMPLE ANOMALIES Sample Location Collection Reason Type Code Date A/I Q-13 02/12/10 Low reading of 169.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months possibly due to power outage.A/I Q-13 04/09/10 Low reading of 87.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months possibly due to severe storms.TLD Q-214-1 06/01/10 Results were outside 3 sigma administrative trend. Duplicate TLD 214-2 in the same sector read as expected.A/I Q-01 06/04/10 Low timer reading due to power outage from electrical storm.A/I Q-07 06/18/10 Power outage at air station due to storm.Field check performed on 06/21/10.-7-13 of 126 Table D-1 LISTING OF SAMPLE ANOMALIES (continued)

Sample Location Collection Reason Type Code Date A/I Q-13 06/25/10 Low reading of 78.7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months due to power outage from storm.A/I Q-03 07/09/10 Low reading of 140.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months due to power outage from storm.A/I Q-41 07/09/10 Low reading of 102 hours0.00118 days 0.0283 hours 1.686508e-4 weeks 3.8811e-5 months due to power outage from storm.A/I Q-03 07/16/10 Low reading of 158.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months due to power outage from storms.A/I Q-37 07/16/10 Low reading of 157.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months due to power outage from storms.A/I Q-38 07/16/10 Low reading of 157.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months due to power outage from storms.A/I Q-37 07/23/10 Low reading of 125.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months due to tripped ground fault outlet; collector reset.A/I Q-41 08/06/10 Low reading of 86.7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months due to power outage from storms.A/I Q-03 08/27/10 Air particulate filter torn; possibly by birds.TLD Q-202-2 09/03/10 TLD was missing during monthly check;spare #02135175 placed on 09/08/10.A/I Q-37 09/03/10 Low reading of 158.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months due to power outage from storms.A/I Q-38 09/03/10 Low reading of 158.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months due to power outage from storms.TLD ALL 09/31/10 3 rd Quarter REMP TLDs were not sent off in a timely manner. This led to higher doses on the TLDs when read. All TLDs were consistent with the control TLDs.A/I Q-01, Q-02, 10/03/10 Sample timer indicated 216 hours0.0025 days 0.06 hours 3.571429e-4 weeks 8.2188e-5 months which isQ-03, Q-04, outside the scheduled frequency of 168Q-37, Q-38 hours +/- 25% (126 -210 hours) due to vendor availability. 14 of 126 Table D-1 LISTING OF SAMPLE ANOMALIES (continued)

Sample Location Collection Reason Type Code Date A/I Q-01, Q-02, 10/15/10 Sample timer indicated 119 hours0.00138 days 0.0331 hours 1.967593e-4 weeks 4.52795e-5 months which is Q-03, Q-04, outside the scheduled frequency of 168 Q-37, Q-38 hours +/- 25% (126 -210 hours) due to vendor availability.

A/I Q-41 10/15/10 Low reading of 160.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months due to work on lines in area.A/I Q-41 10/29/10 Low reading of 148.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months due to power outage from strong winds.A/I Q-01 11/26/10 Low reading of 124.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months due to power outage; station notified.AlI Q-01 12/03/10 Low reading of 99.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months due to recent power restoration.

TLD Q-111-1 12/31/10 Results were outside 3 sigma administrative trend. TLDs 211-1 and 211-2 in the same sector read as expected.TLD Q-111-2 12/31/10 Results were outside 3 sigma administrative trend. TLD 112-1, which is 0.25 miles away, read as expected.

TLDs 211-1 and 211-2 in the same sector read as expected Table D-2 LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES Sample Location Collection Reason Type Code Date SW Q-33 01/01/10 -02/26/10 No sample; water frozen SW Q-34 01/01/10 -02/26/10 No sample; water frozen TLD Q-38-2 02/12/10 Collector placed spare Q2127430 to replace TLD found missing on 02/05/10.A/I Q-37 04/02/10 Low reading of 9.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months due to tripped ground fault outlet; collector reset.-9-15 of 126 Table D-2 LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES (continued)

Sample Location Collection Reason Type Code Date A/I Q-37 04/09/10 Low reading of 10.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months due to tripped ground fault outlet.A/I Q-41 04/23/10 Low reading of 2.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months possibly due to extensive construction in area.A/I Q-41 06/18/10 Low reading of 29.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months due to power outage caused by storm.Field check performed on 06/21/10.A/I Q-37 06/25/10 Low reading of 1.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months due to power outage from storm.ANI Q-41 06/25/10 Low reading of 6.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months due to power outage from storm.A/I Q-37 08/20/10 Low reading of 7.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months due to tripped ground fault outlet; collector reset.A/I Q-41 10/22/10 Low reading of 4.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months due to power outage.SW Q-33 12/03/10 -12/31/10 No sample; water frozen SW Q-34 12/03/10 -12/31/10 No sample; water frozen A/I Q-37 12/24/10 No sample due to pump stoppage;0.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months runtime not enough for viable sample; pump reset.The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and equipment are in place to assure reliable program implementation.

E. Program Changes There were no changes to the program in 2010.-10-16 of 126 IV. Results and Discussion A. Aquatic Environment

1. Surface Water Samples were taken weekly and composited monthly at two locations (Q-33 and Q-34). Of these locations only Q-33, located downstream, could be affected by Quad Cities' effluent releases.The following analyses were performed.

Gross Beta Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta (Table C-1.1, Appendix C). Gross beta activity was detected in 16 of 20 samples. The values ranged from 4.0 to 10.1 pCi/L. Concentrations detected were consistent with those detected in previous years and the control location (Figure C-1, Appendix C). The required LLD was met.Tritium Quarterly composites of weekly collections were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-1.2, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected (Figure C-2, Appendix C). The 2000 pCi/L OCDM and contractually required 200 pCi/L LLDs were met.Gamma Spectrometry Samples from both locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-1.3, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.2. Ground Water Quarterly grab samples were collected at two locations (Q-35 and Q-36). Both locations could be affected by Quad Cities' effluent releases.

The following analyses were performed:

Tritium Quarterly grab samples from the locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-11.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected (Figure C-3, Appendix C). The 2000 pCi/L OCDM and contractually required 200 pCi/L LLDs were met.-11 -17 of 126 Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-I1.2, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.3. Fish Fish samples comprised of various commercially and recreationally important species were collected at two locations (Q-24 and Q-29)semiannually.

Location Q-24 could be affected by Quad Cities'effluent releases.

The following analysis was performed:

Gamma SpectrometryThe edible portion of fish samples from both locations was analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-I11.1, Appendix C).No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.4. Sediment Aquatic sediment samples were collected at two locations (Q-39 and Q-40) semiannually.

The location Q-39, located downstream, could be affected by Quad Cities' effluent releases.

The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometry Sediment samples from Q-39 and Q-40 were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1, Appendix C). Cesium-137 was detected in one of four samples at a concentration of 75 pCi/kg dry.No other nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.B. Atmospheric Environment1 .Airborne a. Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples were collected from ten locations on a weekly basis. The ten locations were separated into three groups: Near-field samplers within 4 km (2.5 miles) of the site (Q-01, Q-02, Q-03 and Q-04), far-field samplers between 4 and 10 km (2.5 -6.2 miles)from the site (Q-13, Q-16, Q-37, Q-38, Q-41) and the Control sampler between 10 and 30 km (6.2 -18.6 miles)-12-18 of 126 from the site (Q-07). The following analyses were performed:

Gross Beta Weekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Table C-V.1 and C-V.2, Appendix C).Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations.

Comparison of results among the four groups aid in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of QCNPS. The results from the near-field locations (Group I) ranged from 6 to 42 E-03 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 18 E-03 pCi/m .The results from the far-field locations (Group II)ranged from 6 to 45 E-03 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 18 E-03 pCi/m 3.The results from the Control location (Group IlI)ranged from 6 to 40 E-03 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 19 E-03 pCi/m 3.Comparison of the 2010 air particulate data with previous years data indicate no effects from the operation of QCNPS. In addition a comparison of the weekly mean values for 2010 indicate no notable differences among the three groups (Figures C-4 through C-6, Appendix C).Gamma Spectrometry Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-V.3, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.b. Airborne Iodine Continuous air samples were collected from ten locations (Q-01, Q-02, Q-03, Q-04, Q-07, Q-13, Q-16, Q-37, Q-38 and Q-41) and analyzed weekly for 1-131 (Table C-VI.1, Appendix C). All results were less than the MDC and the required LLD was met.2. Terrestrial

a. Milk Samples were collected from one location (Q-26) biweekly May through October and monthly November through April.The following analyses were performed: 19 of 126 Iodine-1 31 Milk samples from the location were analyzed for concentrations of 1-131 (Table C-VII.1, Appendix C). No 1-131 was detected and the LLD was met.Gamma Spectrometry Each milk sample was analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VII.2, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.b. Food Products Food product samples were collected at four locations plus a control location (Q-Quad 1 -Control, Q-Quad 1, Q-Quad 2, Q-Quad 3, and Q-Quad 4) annually during growing season.Four locations, (Q-Quad 1, Q-Quad 2, Q-Quad 3 and Q-Quad 4) could be affected by Quad Cities' effluent releases.

The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VIII.1, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.C. Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured utilizing thermoluminescent dosimeters.

Forty-one TLD locations were established around the site. Results of TLD measurements are listed in Tables C-IX.1 to C-IX.3, Appendix C.Most of the TLD measurements were below 30 mR/quarter, with a range of 15 to 48 mR/quarter.

A comparison of the Inner Ring, Outer Ring and Other data to the Control Location data, indicate that the ambient gamma radiation levels from all the locations were comparable.

D. Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation QCNPS commenced use of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) in Dec 2005. There were no measurable changes in ambient gamma and radiation level as a result of ISFSI operations. 20 of 126 E. Land Use Survey A Land Use Survey conducted during August 2010 around QCNPS was performed by Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) for Exelon Nuclear to comply with the Quad Cities' Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The purpose of the survey was to document the nearest resident and milk producing animals in each of the sixteen 22 11/2 degree sectors around thesite. The results from the land use census have not identified any locations, which yield a calculated dose or dose commitment, via the same pathway, that is at least 20% greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained.

The results of this survey are summarized below.Sector N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Distance in Miles Residence Miles 0.6 3.8 1.3 2.9 2.0 2.8 2.5 1.1 0.8 3.2 2.9 2.2 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.1 from QCNPS Livestock Miles 2.7 2.9 2.7 3.1 3.2 3.6 1.6 3.4 3.3 3.5 4.3 3.8 4.7 2.2 Milk Farm Miles 3.1, 11.5 6.6 4.6 F. Errata Data No errata data was noted in 2010.G. Summary of Results -Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program The primary and secondary laboratories analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices (Appendix D). The PE samples, supplied by Analytics Inc., Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following pre-set acceptance criteria:-15-21 of 126

1. Analytics Evaluation Criteria Analytics' evaluation report provides a ratio of laboratory results and Analytics' known value. Since flag values are not assigned by Analytics, TBE-ES evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.2. ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established per the USEPA, NELAC, state specific PT program requirements or ERA's SOP for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document.3. DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values.The MAPEP defines three levels of performance:

Acceptable (flag = "A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from +/-20% to +/-30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% < bias < 30%). If the bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

For the primary laboratory, 16 out of 18 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria.

Two analytes did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reason: 1. Teledyne Brown Engineering's ERA November 2010 Sr-89 in water result of 77.8 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 68.5 pCi/L, resulting in a found to known ratio of 1.14. NCR 10-09 was initiated to investigate this failure. Since the ratio of 1.14 fell within an acceptance range of 20%, Teledyne considers this an acceptable result.2. Teledyne Brown Engineering's ERA November 2010 Zn-65 in water result of 11.0 pCi/L was lower than the known value of 102-16-22 of 126 pCi/L. NCR 10-09 was initiated to investigate this failure. The Zn-65 result of 111 was incorrectly reported as 11.0.For the secondary laboratory, Environmental, Inc., 14 out of 14 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria.The Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program provides evidence of "in control" counting systems and methods, and that the laboratories are producing accurate and reliable data.-17-23 of 126 Intentionally left blank 24 of 126 APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT

SUMMARY

25 of 126 Intentionally left blank 26 of 126 TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (PCIILITER)

GR-B H-3 GAMMA MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 20 8 204 6.2 (8/10)(4.3/10.1)2000 <LLD 15 <LLD 15 <LLD 30 <LLD 15 <LLD 30 <LLD 15 <LLD 5.8 (8/10)(4.0/10.0) 6.2 (8/10)(4.3/10.1)

Q-33 INDICATOR CORDOVA 3.1 MILES SSW OF SITE 0<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD

<LLD<LLD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O NB-95 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (PCI/LITER)

ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 30 <LLD 15 <LLD 15 <LLD 18 <LLD 60 <LLD 15 <LLD2000 <LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 0 0 0 0 GROUND WATER (PCI/LITER)

H-3 8 NA 00 0 GAMMA MN-54 15 <LLD NA 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATIONMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS GROUND WATER (PCI/LITER)

CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 15 <LLD 30 <LLD 15 <LLD 30 <LLD 15 <LLD 30 <LLD 15 <LLD 15 <LLD NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ON MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS GROUND WATER (PCL/LITER)

CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 GAMMA MN-54 FISH (PCI/KG WET)8 18 <LLD 60 <LLD 15 <LLD 130 <LLD 130 <LLD 260 <LLD 130 <LLD 260 <LLD NA NA NA 0 0 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 0 0 0 0 Co 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATIONMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS FISH(PCI/KG WET)

SEDIMENT (PCI/KG DRY)NB-95 ZR-95 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 GAMMA MN-54 NA <LLD NA <LLD 130 <LLD 150 <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 0 0 0 0 0 0 4<LLD<LLD 0 0 0 CO-58 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT (PCI/KG DRY)FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD 150 <LLD 180 75 (1/2)NA <LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 0 0 0 0 0 75 (1/2)Q-39 INDICATOR 0 CORDOVA -DOWNSTREAM MISSISSIPPI RIVER 0.8 MILES SSW OF SITE 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATIONMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT (PCI/KG DRY)LA-140AIR PARTICULATE (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)

GR-B 511 40 GAMMA MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NA <LLD 10 18 (445/459)(6/45)NA <LLDNA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD 19 (49/52)(6/40)<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 19 (45/48)(6/45)Q-41 INDICATOR COMANCHE 4.3 MILES NNE OF SITE 0<LLD 0 0

0 0 0 NB-95 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD:

ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OFPATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS AIR PARTICULATE (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) 00 ZR-95 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 GAMMA 1-131 NA <LLD 50 <LLD 60 <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 0 0 0 0 0 AIR IODINE (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) 511 MILK (PCI/LITER) 1-131 19 19 70 <LLD I <LLD NA <LLD<LLD NA 0 0 ON GAMMA MN-54 NA 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATIONMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS MILK (PCI/LITER)

CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 CS-134 CS-137 NA <LLD NA <LLDNA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD 15 <LLD 18 <LLD NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0 0 U, 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY:

CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATIONMEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS MILK (PCI/LITER)

BA- 140 LA-140 GAMMA MN-54 0>VEGETATION (PCI/KG WET)12 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 60 <LLD 15 <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLDNA <LLD NA NA<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 NAME OF FACILITY:

QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 &50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2010 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION (PCI/KG WET)ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 NA <LLD 60 <LLD 60 <LLD 80 <LLD NA <LLD NA <LLD NA 28.5 (323/323)(15/48)<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD<LLD 28.5 (8/8)(18/42)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DIRECT RADIATION (MILLI-ROENTGEN/QTR.)

TLD-QUARTERLY 331 31.5 (4/4)(22/45)Q-211-2 INDICATOR

4.5 MILES

SW--1 0 I'J MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

Intentionally left blank 38 of 126 APPENDIX B LOCATION DESIGNATION, SAMPLE COLLECTION DISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND& ANALYTICAL METHODS 39 of 126 Intentionally left blank 40 of 126 TABLE B-1: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Location Location Description Distance & DirectionFrom Site A. Surface Water Q-33 Q-34 Cordova (indicator)

Camanche, Upstream (control)B. Ground/Well Water Q-35 Q-36 McMillan Well (indicator)

Cordova Well (indicator)

C. Milk -bi-weeklv

/ monthly Q-26 Bill Stanley Dairy (indicator)

D. Air Particulates

/ Air Iodine Q-01 Q-02 Q-03 Q-04 Q-07 Q-13 Q-16 Q-37 Q-38 Q-41 Onsite 1 (indicator)

Onsite 2 (indicator)

Onsite 3 (indicator)

Nitrin (indicator)

Clinton (control)Princeton (indicator)

Low Moor (indicator)

Meredosia Road (indicator)

Fuller Road (indicator)

Camanche (indicator)

Pool #14 of Mississippi River, Downstream (indicator)

Mississippi River, Upstream (control)Cordova, Downstream on Mississippi River (indicator)

North of Albany, Upstream on Mississippi River(control)

3.1 miles

SSW 4.4 miles NNE 1.5 miles S 3.3 miles SSW 3.5 miles ESE 0.5 miles N 0.4 miles ENE 0.6 miles S 1.7 miles NE 8.8 miles NE 4.7 miles SW 5.7 miles NNW 4.4 miles ENE 4.7 miles E 4.3 miles NNE 0.5 miles SW 1.0 miles N 0.8 miles SSW 8.9 miles NE 2.3 miles ENE 3.0 miles ESE 1.8 miles S 4.5 miles NW 9.5 miles NE E. Fish Q-24 Q-29 F. Sediment Q-39 Q-40 G. Food Products Quadrant 1 Quadrant 2 Quadrant 3 Quadrant 4 Control Ken DeBaille Dale Nimmic Amy Johnston Mike Fawcett Charles Leavens H. Environmental Dosimetry

-TLD Inner Ring Q-101-1 Q-101-2 Q-102-1 Q-102-3 Q-103-1 and -2 Q-104-1 Q-104-2 Q-105-1 and -2 Q-106-2 and -3 Q-107-2 Q-107-3 Q-108-1 Q-108-2 0.6 miles N 0.9 miles N 1.3 miles NNE 1.4 miles NNE 1.2 miles NE 1.1 miles ENE 0.9 miles ENE 0.8 miles E 0.7 miles ESE 0.7 miles SE 0.8 miles SE 1.0 miles SSE 0.9 miles SSE B-1 41 of 126 TABLE B-1: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Location Location Description Distance & Direction From Site H. Environmental Dosimetry

-TLD (continued)

Inner Ring Q-109-1 Q-109-2 Q-111-1 Q-111-2 Q-112-1 Q-112-2 Q-113-1 and-2 Q-114-1 Q-114-2 Q-115-1 Q-115-2 Q-116-1 Q-116-3 Outer Ring Q-202-1 Q-202-2 Q-203-1 Q-203-2 Q-204-1 Q-204-2 Q-205-1 Q-205-4 Q-206-1 and -2 Q-207-1 and -4 Q-208-1 Q-208-2 Q-209-1 and -4 Q-210-1 and -4*Q-210-5 Q-211-1 and -2 Q-212-1 Q-212-2 Q-213-1 Q-213-2 Q-214-1 Q-214-2 Q-215-1 Q-215-2 Q-216-1 Q-216-2 0.9 miles S 1.2 miles S 2.6 miles SW 2.5 miles SW 2.5 miles WSW 2.2 miles WSW 2.5 miles W 2.1 miles WNW 2.5 miles WNW 2.6 miles NW 2.3 miles NW 2.3 miles NNW 2.4 miles NNW 4.4 miles NNE 4.8 miles NNE 4.7 miles NE 5.0 miles NE 4.7 miles ENE 4.5 miles ENE 4.7 miles E 4.8 miles E 4.8 miles ESE 4.7 miles SE 4.3 miles SSE 4.9 miles SSE 4.7 miles S 4.1 miles SSW 3.3 miles SSW 4.5 miles SW 5.4 miles WSW 4.4 miles WSW 4.3 miles W 4.8 miles W 4.7 miles WNW 4.4 miles WNW 5.0 miles NW 4.2 miles NW 4.6 miles NNW 4.3 miles NNW 0.5 miles N 0.4 miles ENE 0.6 miles S 1.7 miles NE 4.7 miles SW 5.7 miles NNW 4.4 miles ENE 4.7 miles E 4.3 miles NNE Other Q-01 Q-02 Q-03 Q-04 Q-13 Q-16 Q-37 Q-38 Q-41 Onsite 1 (indicator)

Onsite 2 (indicator)

Onsite 3 (indicator)

Nitrin (indicator)

Princeton (indicator)

Low Moor (indicator)

Meredosia Road (indicator)

Fuller Road (indicator)

Camanche (indicator)

B-2 42 of 126 TABLE B-i: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Location Location Description Distance & DirectionFrom Site H. Environmental Dosimetry -

TLD (continued)

Control Q-07 Clinton (control)

8.8 miles

NE* Removed from ODCM in December 2006 and replaced by Q-210-5. Q-210-4 is for trending only.B-3 43 of 126 TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Analytical Procedure Number MediumSurface Water Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly composite from TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis weekly grab samples.Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters bygamma spectroscopySurface Water Gross Beta Monthly composite from TBE, TBE-2008 Gross Alpha and/or gross beta activity in weekly grab samples. various matrices Env. Inc., W(DS)-01 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in water (dissolved solids or total residue)Surface Water Tritium Quarterly composite TBE, TBE-2011 Tritium analysis in drinking water by liquid from weekly grab scintillation samples.Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)Ground Water Gamma Spectroscopy Quarterly grab samples. TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Ground Water Tritium Quarterly grab samples. TBE, TBE-2011 Tritium analysis in drinking water by liquid scintillation Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)Fish Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual samples TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis collected via electroshocking or other Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by techniques gamma spectroscopy Sediment Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual grab TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis samples Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Air Particulates Gross Beta One-week composite of TBE, TBE-2008 Gross Alpha and/or gross beta activity in continuous air sampling various matrices through glass fiber filter paper Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in air particulate filters Air Particulates Gamma Spectroscopy Quarterly composite of TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis each station Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Air Iodine Gamma Spectroscopy Weekly composite of TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis continuous air sampling through charcoal filter Env. Inc., 1-131-02 Determination of 1-131 in charcoal canisters by gamma spectroscopy (batch method)Milk 1-131 Bi-weekly grab sample TBE, TBE-2012 Radioiodine in various matrices when cows are on pasture. Monthly all Env. Inc., 1-131-01 Determination of 1-131 in milk by anion other times exchange Milk Gamma Spectroscopy Bi-weekly grab sample TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis when cows are on pasture. Monthly all Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by other times gamma spectroscopy Food Products Gamma Spectroscopy Annual grab samples. TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy TLD Thermoluminescence Quarterly TLDs Mirion Technologies I Dosimetry I I B-4 44 of 126 U s am- W 10,-li0 06i t l &UNE u o lu- .u u U 3Z lu-liL Am=llu-li -TOM 0 ONJ q V I AW A QUAD CITIES STATION FIGURE 6-1 REMP Sample Locations I I It mi au ~Figure B-1 Quad Cities REMP Sample Locations

-2 Mile Radius, 2010

-- .., 'o~ 021000.F I .... .. .. ..

.... ........* -0.. *L21 M-LD SEC70Rioi -. -11.-1.2 -1.3 .0'IOl. I3 E 2.2-1.2 -E 205-l1.; COO,1023- 1.2 107-.3 S108--.2 SSE 111-1.2 202-1.2 CNE20 -1.2 C40 200-l.a CNC 210-1.5 50 011-1.0 SW 010-la W50.AIRS LERSTLD SeCtOR.1 -I '/4E0407 REr 38 e-s--SECON-A' RO.DS--RVIVRS/ST R-JM A METEOROLOOIC3L TOWER

8.,04,. w St1R 04010 SECTOR* 0 .0'. SECTOR 24 CSO SCTOT RE** SSW~OUAD CITIES STATION FIGURE 6-2 REMP Sample Locatons R-E REOCR.DESCR-101'Pso -Ro-2-R-200- --S RM GSPRD APP"L I~ R--C-O ILLINOIS C)O*T 0 EN11= .I -I I~ I I I P00410 --11 Figure B-2 Quad Cities REMP Sampling Locations -9.3 Mile Radius, 2010 APPENDIX C DATA TABLES AND FIGURES PRIMARY LABORATORY 47 of 126 Intentionally left blank 48 of 126 TABLE C-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD Q-33 Q-34 01/01/10 01/29/10 03/05/10 04/02/10 05/07/10 06/04/10 07/02/10 08106/10 09/03/10 10/01/10 11/05/10 12/03/10 01/29/10 02/26/10 03/26/10 04/30/10 05/28/10 06/25/10 07/30/10 08/27/10 09/24/10 10/29/10 11/26/10 12/03/10 (1)(1)* 3.1 6.8 +/-2.1 6.1 +/-2.2< 3.3 4.8 +/-2.0 7.3 +/-2.2 4.3 +/-2.5 4.4 +/-2.7 6.0 +/-1.9 10.1 +/- 2.2 (1)6.2 +/- 3.8 (1)(1)* 2.8 5.5 +/- 2.0 6.8 +/- 2.2* 3.2 5.6 +/- 2.1 4.0 +/- 1.9 5.2 +/- 2.5 4.6 +/- 2.7 4.6 +/- 1.8 10.0 +/- 2.3 (1)5.8 +/- 3.8 MEAN TABLE C-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD Q-33 Q-34 U3/05/10 04/02/10 07/02/10 10/01/10 03/26/10 06/25/10 09/24/10 12/03/10< 174 (1)* 160* 196< 172 (1)< 170 (1)* 159< 200< 191 (1)MEAN* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-1 49 of 126 TABLE C-1.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD Q-33 01/01/10 -01/29/10 (1)01/29/10 -

02/26/10 (1)03/05/10 -03/26/10 04/02/10 -04/30/10 05/07/10 -05/28/10 06/04/10 -06/25/1007/02/10 -

07/30/1008/06/10 -

08/27/10 09/03/10 -09/24/1010/01/10 -

10/29/1011/05/10 -

11/26/10 12/03/10 -12/03/10 (1)

Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140<1<2<2<1<2<1<1<2<2<1<1<3<2<1<2<1<1<2

<2<1<2<7<4<3<5<3<2<4<5

<3<0<2<1<1<2<1<1<2<2<1<1<5<3<3<4<2<2

<4<3<2<1<3<2<2

<2<1<1<2<2<1<1<5<3<3<4<2<2<4<3

<2< 15< 14< 14<7< 12<6<9< 11< 12< 12<0<2<2

<1<2<1<1<2<1<1<1<3<2<1<2<1<1<2<2<1< 14< 26< 21< 13< 20< 10< 12< 18< 18< 39<4<8<5<4<6<3<3<6<6< 12 MEAN Q-34 01/01/10 01/29/10 03/05/10 04/02/10 05/07/10 06/04/10 07/02/10 08/06/10 09/03/10 10/01/10 11/05/10 12/03/10-01/29/10 (1)-02/26/10 (1)-03/26/10-04/30/10-05/28/10-06/25/10-07/30/10-08/27/10-09/24/10-10/29/10-11/26/10-12/03/10 (1)

<1<2<2<2<2<1<1<2<1<1<1<2<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<1<2<6<4<4<5<4<4<4<4<3<1<2<2<2<2<1<1<2

<1<1<1<5<3<3<5<3<3<3<3<2<1<3<2<2<3<2<2<2<2<1<1<4<3<3<4<3<3<3<3<3< 15< 12< 14<8< 14< 11< 14< 12< 11< 10<1<2<2<1<2<2<1<1<1<1<1<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<1<1< 15< 22< 21< 15< 24< 18< 21< 19< 17< 42<4<7<6<4<6<5<6<7<6< 13 Vl C MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION t,,o TABLE C-I1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECT IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD Q-35 Q-36 01/08/10 -01/08/10 04/09/10 -04/09/10 07/19/10 -07/19/10 10/08/10 -10/08/10< 164< 160< 159< 176< 164< 158* 163< 166 MEAN C-3 51 of 126 TABLE C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Ba-140 La-140 Q-35 01/08/10 -01/08/10 < 4 04/09/10 -04/09/10 < 4 07/09/10 -07/09/10 < 510/08/10 -10/08/10

< 7 MEAN<4<4

<5<7<3<5

<7<5< 10<9< 11< 13<8<9< 16< 13<3 <8 <5<4 <8 <4<6 <11 <7<7 <15 <8<7<8<9< 12<6<8< 10< 10< 11< 13< 10< 11< 10< 14< 12< 13<4<4

<5< 7<3

<5

<7<6<6<4<6<7<3<5<6<7< 29< 29< 31< 37< 23< 35< 26< 29<9<9< 10< 12<7< 10<8< 10 Q-36 01/08/10 -01/08/10 < 3 04/09/10 -04/09/10 < 4 07/09/10 -07/09/10 < 6 10/08/10 -10/08/10 < 6<3<4<7<6<8<9< 15< 14<4<5<6<7 C-)MEAN ON TABLE C-II1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FISH SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PC/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59Co-60Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Q-24 Channel Catfish 05/03/10 Common Carp 05/03/10 Channel Catfish 10/19/10 Largemouth Bass 10/19/10< 49< 51< 44< 51< 57< 67< 49< 57< 168< 146< 107< 114< 33< 57< 43< 59< 111< 118< 104< 115< 66< 73< 47< 64< 110< 112< 89< 93< 43< 41< 37< 44< 45< 49< 59< 49< 1220< 1590< 365< 367< 341< 403< 78< 138 MEAN C Q-29 t" Common Carp 05/03/10 Shorthead Redhorse 05/03/10 Channel Catfish 10/19/10 Freshwater Drum 10/19/10 MEAN< 52< 48< 53< 58< 66< 79< 59< 50< 157< 169< 129< 112< 49< 56< 50< 63< 132< 110< 119< 122< 74< 75< 68< 67< 114< 160< 100< 87< 58< 44< 55< 44< 52< 56< 58< 46< 1790< 1870< 425< 328< 503< 474< 94< 96 I'J TABLE C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PC/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137Ba-140La-140 Q-39 05/28/10 10/29/10< 59< 71< 69< 69< 141< 156< 62< 87< 115< 173< 82< 87< 120< 143< 46< 60< 59< 870< 236< 169 75 +/- 50 < 525 MEAN Q-40 05/28/10 10/29/10< 52< 31< 52< 37< 126< 81< 49< 35< 124< 71< 61< 43< 112< 57< 42< 26< 55< 41< 771< 276< 279< 80 n MEAN ("I* THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES TABLE C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD 01/01/10 -01/08/10 01/08/10 -01/15/10 01/15/10 -01/22/10 01/22/10 -01/29/10 01/29/10 -02/05/10 02/05/10 -02/12/10 02/12/10 -02/19/10 02/19/10 -02/26/10 02/26/10 -03/05/10 03/05/10 -03/11/10 03/11/10 -03/19/10 03/19/10 -03/26/10 03/26/10 -04/02/10 04/02/10 -04/09/10 04/09/10 -04/16/10 04/16/10 -04/23/10 04/23/10 -04/30/10 04/30/10 -05/07/10 05/07/10 -05/14/10 05/14/10 -05/21/10 05/21/10 -05/28/10 05/28/10 -06/04/10 06/04/10 -06/10/10 06/10/10 -06/18/10 06/18/10 -06/25/10 06/25/10 -07/02/10 07/02/10 -07/09/10 07/09/10 -07/16/10 07/16/10 -07/23/10 07/23/10 -07/30/10 07/30/10 -08/06/10 08/06/10 -08/13/10 08/13/10 -08/20/10 08/20/10 -08/26/10 08/26/10 -09/03/10 09/03/10 -09/10/10 09/10/10 -09/17/10 09/17/10 -09/24/10 09/24/10 -10/01/10 10/01/10 -10/08/10 10/08/10 -10/15/10 10/15/10 -10/21/10 10/21/10 -10/29/10 10/29/10 -11/05/10 11/05/10 -11/12/10 11/12/10 -11/19/10 11/19/10 -11/26/10 11/26/10 -12/03/10 12/03/10 -12/10/10 12/10/10 -12/17/10 12/17/10 -12/23/10 12/23/10 -12/31/10 GROUP I Q-01 27 +/- 6 36 +/- 4 25 +/- 5 21 +/- 4 27 +/- 5 13 +/- 4 14 +/-4 25 +/-5 19 +/-5 17 +/-4<7 <9+/-5 20 +/-5 12 +/-4 21 +/-4 17 +/-4 20 +/-4 11 +/-4 10+/-4 <11 +/-4 17 +/-4 14 4 4(1)19 +/-5 9 +/-4 9 +/-4 9 +/-4 16 +/- 5 14 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 11 +/-4 21 +/-4 26 +/-5 19 +/-4 17 +/-4 19 +/-4 12 +/-4 15 +/-3 20 +/-5 11 +/-3 27+/-5(1)35 +/- 5 23 +/-4 (1)16 +/- 5 12 +/- 3 21 +/- 4 22 +/- 5 21 +/- 6(l)36 +/-6(1)26 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 13 +/- 4 4 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2Q-02 Q-03 6 +/-5 24 +/-5 2 +/-4 39+/- 4 6 +/-5 25+/- 5 0 +/-4 17 +/-4 4 +/-5 22+/- 5 8 +/-4 22 +/-4 4 +/-4 17 +/-4 4 +/-5 23+/- 5 5 +/-4 18+/- 5 1 +/-3 16 +/-4 7 < 7 2+/-5 9+/-5 0+/-5 17+/-4 3+/-4 14+/-4 1+/-4 21+/-4 4+/-4 18+/-4 1+/-4 12+/-4 3+/-4 11+/-4< 5 1+/-4 12+/-4 4+/-4 14+/-4 5+/-4 15+/- 4 5+/-4 15+/- 4 9 4 11+/-4 0+/-4 9+/-4 6 +/-4 8 +/-4 5+/-5 18+/-5(1)2+/-5 23+/-5(1)7+/-4 17+/-4 0+/-4 14+/-4 7+/-4 20+/-4 9 +/-4 18+/-4 9 +/-4 21+/-4 6 +/-4 17+/-4 (1)6 +/-4 14+/-4 2 +/-4 12+/-4 6 +/-3 19+/-3 9 +/-5 17+/-5 1 +/-3 14+/-3 3 +/- 4(1) 23+/-4 (1)8 +/-6 37+/-5 5 +/-3(1) 20+/-3 (1)1 +/-5 18+/-5 1 +/-3 13+/-3 3 +/-3 19+/-3.3 +/-5 25+/-5.1+/- 4 16+/- 4 2 +/-3 24+/- 4 4 +/-5 15+/- 4 5 +/-5 27+/- 5.6 +/-5 22+/- 5 9 +/-4 15+/- 4 GROUP 11 Q-04 20 +/- 5 37 +/- 4 25 +/- 5 17 +/- 4 26 +/- 5 14 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 19 +/- 5 14 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 9 +/-5 12 +/-5 14 +/-4 7 +/-4 18 +/-4 13 +/-4 16 +/-4 8+/-3 7 +/-4 12 +/-4 12 +/-4 14 +/-4 11 +/-4 9 +/-4 10 +/-4 6 +/-4 14 +/-4 20 +/-5 20 +/-5 10 +/-4 22 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 22 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 11 +/-4 20 +/-3 17 +/-5 15 +/-3 30 +/-5 (1 33 +/-5 22 +/-3 (1 17 +/- 5 14 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 27 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 26 +/- 4 26 +/- 5 27 +/- 5 27 +/- 5 12 +/- 4 Q-13 29 +/- 5 43 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 19 +/- 4 28 +/- 5 16 +/- 4(1)15 +/- 4 21 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 21 +/- 5< 5< 8 17 +/- 4 14 +/- 3(1)19 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 8+/-3 9 +/-4 10 +/-4 13 +/-4 13 +/-4 15 +/-5 11 +/-3 12 +/- 8(1)7 +/-4< 5 22 +/-5 19 +/-4 17 +/-4 19 +/-4 12 +/-4 15 +/-4 19 +/-5 15 +/-4 12 +/-4 21 +/-4 14 +/-4 15 +/-4 I)19 +/-4 36 +/-4 I)20 +/-4 18 +/-4 11 +/-3 19 +/-4 22 +/-4 19 +/-4 24 +/-4 35 +/-6 27 +/-5 28 +/-6 16 +/-4 Q-16 27 +/- 5 41 +/- 5 27 +/- 5 19 +/- 4 26 +/- 5 19 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 21 +/- 5 17 +/- 5 18 +/- 5 8+/-3 15 +/-6 21 +/-5 8 +/-4 13 +/-4 19 +/-4 17 +/-4 11 +/-4 8 +/-4 9 +/-4 16 +/-4 17 +/-4 13 +/-5 11 +/-4 14 +/-4 9 +/-4 12 +/-4 21 +/-5 19 +/-4 8 +/-4 15 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 21 +/- 5 18 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 23 +/- 4 35 +/- 419 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 8+/-3 20 +/-4 25 +/-4 19 +/-4 26 +/-4 33 +/-5 28 +/-5 33 +/-6 15 +/-4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q-37 Q-38 3 22+/- 5 9 +/-4 38+/- 4 0 +/-4 24+/- 5 7+/-4 11+/-3 9+/-4 19+/-5 8+/-4 22+/-4 5+/-4 12+/-4 7+/-5 22+/-5 8+/-4 15+/-4 8+/-4 13+/-4 7 <7 0+/-5 14+/-6 (1) 15+/-4 (1) 11 +/-4 9 +/-4 19+/- 4 6 +/-4 16+/- 4 8 +/-4 14+/- 4 8+/-3 7+/-3 <0+/-4 8+/-4 <1+/-4 11+/-4 2+/-4 12+/-4 0+/-4 11+/-4 9+/-4 11+/-4 1+/-4 11+/-4 (1) 12+/-4 7 +/-4 9 +/-4 <3+/-4 16+/-5 5 +/-4(1) 25 +/-5(1)7+/-5 (1) 21 +/-5 7+/-4 9+/-4 6 +/-4 21+/-4 83+/-4 13+/- 4 (1) 21+/- 4 7 +/-4 18+/- 40 +/- 4 (1) 16 +/- 4 (1)9 +/-4 9 +/-4 9+/-3 20+/-3 9+/-5 13+/-5 5+/-3 13+/-3 6 +/-4(1) 26 +/-5(1)1+/-5 25+/-5 0 +/- 3(1) 22+/-4 (1)7 +/-5 19+/- 5 93+/-3 18+/- 3 7 +/-3 15+/- 3 3 +/-5 32+/- 5 1 +/-4 26+/- 5 2 +/-3 20+/- 3 4 +/-5 27+/- 5 5 +/-5 27+/- 5 (1) 24+/- 5 3 +/-4 11+/- 4 Q-41 21 +/- 5 32 +/- 4 25 +/- 5 15 +/- 4 25 +/- 5 16 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 24 +/- 5 14 +/- 4 18 +/- 5 6+/-3 14 +/-6 20 +/-5 10 +/-4 16 +/-4 15 +/-4 5 5 12 +/-4 13 +/-4 19 +/-4 11 +/-5 6 19 +/-6 17 +/-4 22 +/-5 11 +/-4 11 +/-7 23 +/-5 23 +/-4 22 +/-5 17 +/-4 12 +/-4 17 +/-4 18 +/-4 20 +/-4 17 +/-4 45 +/-5 21 +/-5 15 +/-3 22 +/-5 23 +/- 4 24 +/- 5 24 +/- 4 35 +/- 6 23 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 11 1 4 IGROUP III Q-07 24 +/- 5 40 +/- 4 27 +/- 5 23 +/- 4 25 +/- 5 16 +/- 4 21 +/- 4 26 +/- 5 18 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 6 +/-3< 8 21 +/-5 9 +/-4 28 +/-5 16 +/-4 20 +/- 4 10 +/- 4< 5 10 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 13 +/- 5 14 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 7 +/-4 1) 16 +/-4 19 +/-4 23 +/-5 11 +/-4 1) 18 +/- 4 21 +/- 5 20 +/- 4 21 +/- 5 14 +/- 4 12 +/- 4<4 16 +/- 4 9 +/-4 19 +/-4 1) 38 +/-4 17 +/-4:1) 13 +/-4 12 +/-3 24 +/-4 23 +/-4 19 +/- 4 22 +/- 4 33 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 34 +/- 6 12 +/- 4 (1)MEAN 19 +/-14 18 +/-14 18 +/-12 17 +/-14 19 +/-14 18+/- 15 16 +/-13 17 +/-13 19 +/- 14 19 +/-15 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-7 0-7 55 of 126 TABLE C-V.2 MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA GROUP I -NEAR-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP 11 -FAR-FIELD LOCATIONS GROUP III -CONTROL LOCATIONS COLLECTION PERIOD MIN MAX MEAN+2SD COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN +PERIOD 2SD COLLECTION PERIOD MIN MAX MEAN +2SD -1-n U IIU/l IU 01/29/10 02/26/10 04/02/10 04/30/10 05/28/10 07/03/10 07/30/10 09/03/10 10/03/10 10/29/10 12/03/10 U IIlvI I U 02/26/10 04/02/10 04/30/10 05/28/10 07/03/10 07/30/10 09/03/10 10/03/10 10/29/10 12/03/10 12/31/10 If 12 9 7 7 6 10 14 11 15 11 9'+-Z 27 20 21 17 19 23 26 20 38 36 29 zi 20 14 15 12 11 16 18 15 25 20 22+10+/-7+/-8+/-5+7+/-8+/-6+/-7

+15+12+/- 13 U IIU II IU 01/29/10 02/26/10 04/02/10 04/30/10 05/28/10 07/02/10 07/30/10 09/03/10 10/03/10 10/29/10 12/03/10-01/29/10-02/26/10-04/02/10-04/30/10-05/28/10-07/03/10-07/30/10-09/03/10-10/08/10-10/29/10-12/03/10-12/31/10 II 12 6 8 7 7 7 8 9 16 8 11.+a 28 21 19 16 19 25 23 23 45 32 35 44 A9 zo 19 15 15 10 12 16 17 16 24 20 24+/-18+/-8+/-8

+/-6+5+/-6+/-10+/-8

+/-7+/-17+11+/- 15 01/01/10 01/29/10 02/26/10 04/02/10 04/30/10 05/28/10 07/02/10 07/30/10 09/03/10 10/08/10 10/29/10 12/03/10-01129/10-02/26/10-04/02/10-04/30/10-05/28/10-07/02/10-07/30/10-09/03/10-10/08/10-10/29/10-12/03/10-12/31/10 23 16 6 9 10 7 11 14 9 13 12 12 40 26 21 28 13 17 23 21 19 38 24 34 28 22 16 18 11 13 17 19 14 23 20 26+/- 16+9+/- 14+/-16+4

+7+/- 10+/-6+/-8+/- 26+/- 10+ 21 n 80 01/02/10 -12/31/10 6 42 18 +/- 1301/01/10 -

12/31/10 6 45 18 +/- 14 01/01/10 -12/31/10 6 40 19 +/- 15 0~

TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD Q-01 01/02/10 -04/02/10 04/02/10 -07/03/10 07/03/10 -10/03/10 10/03/10 -12/31/10 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ba-140 La-140 MEAN Q-02 01/02/10 04/02/10 07/03/10 10/03/10 MEAN Q-03 01/02/10 04/02/10 07/03/10 10/03/10 MEAN Q-04 01/02/10 04/02/10 07/03/10 10/03/10 MEAN 04/02/10 07/03/10 10/03/10 12/31/10 04/02/10 07/03/10 10/03/10 12/31/10 04/02/10 07/03/10 10/03/10 12/31/10<3

<3

<3<2<3<4<3<2<3<3<3

<2<4<3<3<3<4<3<4<4<4<4<3

<3<4<2<4<2<5<5<4<4<5<4<4

<3< 10<6<9<6< 11< 12<7<6< 11< 10< 11<6< 16<9< 13<6< 12< 18< 11<8<2<3<2<3<3<4<3<3<3<3<3<2<4<3

<3<3<7<5<8<8<9< 12<8<6<4<2

<4<4<7<8<9<4<9<5<8<5<4<6<3<2<4<3<4<2<7<3<5<3<4<6<4<4<5<5<6<6<8<9<5<5<9<6<7<4<9<7<7<5<8<8

<7<6<2

<3<3<3<3<5<3<2<3

<4<3<2<4<3<4<2<3

<4<2<3<3<2<2<3<3<3<2<2<3<2<3<2<3<3

<3<3< 117< 61< 97< 36< 173< 68< 90< 26< 114< 48< 105< 25< 209< 55< 91< 32< 164< 95< 78< 38< 71< 35< 31< 13* 70* 18< 42< 11* 76* 17< 32* 16< 50<-29* 44< 14 rLjh 0..Q-07 01/01/10 -04/02/10 04/02/10 -07/02/10 07/02/10 -10/01/10 10/01/10 -12/31/10<3<5

<3<3<3<3<2<2<9< 11<6<8<3<5<3<3< 41-< 38< 33< 8 MEAN TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD Q-13 01/01/10 -04/02/10 04/02/10 -07/02/10 07/02/10 -10/01/10 10/01/10 -12/31/10 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 MEAN 0 Q-16 01/01/10 04/02/10 07/02/10 10/01/10 MEANQ-37 01/02/10 04/02/10 07/03/10 10/03/10 MEAN Q-38 01/02/10 04/02/10 07/03/10 10/03/10 MEAN-04/02110-07/02/10-10/01/10-12/31/10-04/02/10-07/03/10-10/03/10-12/31/10<4<3<2<3<2<3

<3

<2<4<3<4<2<5<5<4<4<4<3

<4

<3<4<5<5<3< 14<9<9<7<9< 11< 11<6< 16<9<7<5<3<4<3

<3<3<3<4<3<4<3<3<3<9< 10<6<7<8<7<7<6<7<6<9<5<5<5<4<4<4<4

<4<3<6<4<5<2<8<9<5<6<5<6

<7<4<9<7<8<5<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<2<3<3<4<3<3<4<3<3<3<2<3<2<4<3<3<2< 204< 107< 93< 39< 118< 50< 104< 20< 171< 62< 102< 31< 61< 25< 35< 14< 51< 30< 42<5< 69< 23< 31<9-04/02/10-07/03/10-10/03/10-12/31/10<3<5<3<3<3<6<3<4<9< 11<8<7<3

<4<2

<3<5<9<6<7<4<5<3<4<8<8

<6<5<2<4<3<3<3<4<2<3< 111< 69< 79< 35< 57< 20< 38< 11 ('I 00 0 TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD Q-41 01/01/10 -04/02/10 04/02/10 -07/02/10 07/02/10 -10/01/10 10/01/10 -12/31/10 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140<3<5<4 <18<5< 11<4 <6 <5 <9 <3<3 <8 <5 <9 <3<4 <6 <3 <7 <2<3 <6 <3 <5 <3<3<3<2<2< 179< 94< 92< 23< 58< 31< 35< 14<3 <3 <14<3 <3 <7 MEAN c-I 0"a TABLE C-VI-.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD 01/01/10 -01/08/10 01/08/10 -01/15/10 01/15/10 -01/22/10 01/22/10 -01/29/10 01/29/10 -02/05/10 02/05/10 -02/12/10 02/12/10 -02/19/10 02/19/10 -02/26/10 02/26/10 -03/05/10 03/05/10 -03/11/10 03/11/10 -03/19/10 03/19/10 -03/26/10 03/26/10 -04/02/10 04/02/10 -04/09/10 04/09/10 -04/16/10 04/16/10 -04/23/10 04/23/10 -04/30/10 04/30/10 -05/07/10 05/07/10 -05/14/10 05/14/10 -05/21/10 05/21/10 -05/28/10 05/28/10 -06/04/10 06/04/10 -06/10/10 06/10/10 -06/18/10 06/18/10 -06/25/10 06/25/10 -07/02/10 07/02/10 -07/09/10 07/09/10 -07/16/10 07/16/10 -07/23/10 07/23/10 -07/30/10 07/30/10 -08/06/10 08/06/10 -08/13/10 08/13/10 -08/20/10 08/20/10 -08/26/10 08/26/10 -09/03/10 09/03/10 -09/10/10 09/10/10 -09/17/10 09/17/10 -09/24/10 09/24/10 -10/01/10 10/01/10 -10/08/10 10/08/10 -10/15/10 10/15/10 -10/21/10 10/21/10 -10/29/10 10/29/10 -11/05/10 11/05/10 -11/12/10 11/12/10 -11/19/1011/19/10 -

11/26/10 11/26/10 -12/03/10 12/03/10 -12/10/10 12/10/10 -12/17/10 12/17/10 -12/23/1012/23/10 -

12/31/10 Q-01< 39* 25* 38<5< 44<16< 42*10* 21<10< 34* 21<10

<13< 34< 17<9* 20* 32* 29* 28<43< 23< 47* 32<15<21* 20< 42<13< 34* 30< 34* 58* 62< 53< 33* 42< 25< 45* 69< 53< 55< 64* 21* 52* 69* 65< 33* 31<16* 42 (1)(1)(1)(1)(1)GROUPI I u-U2 u-u3 U-U4* 37 < 38 < 38* 44 < 46 < 46* 38 < 38 < 38* 10 < 10 < 10< 44 < 44 < 44* 28 < 28 < 28< 42 < 42 < 42< 19 < 19 < 19< 38 < 38 < 38< 19 < 19 < 19< 19 < 34 < 34< 39 < 39 < 39< 10 < 5 < 10* 24 < 24 < 24< 34 < 34 < 19< 31 < 31 < 31<9 <9 <9< 46 < 47 < 47< 32 < 32 < 32< 53 < 53 < 53< 28 < 28 < 28< 23 < 42 < 41< 23 < 23 < 23< 47 < 47 < 47< 31 < 32 < 32< 28 < 28 < 27<48 <48 (1) <48* 37 < 37 (1) < 37< 26 < 41 < 42< 13 < 12 < 13< 34 < 32 < 34< 54 < 52 < 54< 34 < 33 < 19<58 <56 (1) <58< 63 < 60 < 62< 53 < 51 < 41< 33 < 32 < 8< 42 < 41 < 42< 25 < 24 < 25< 45 (1) <44 (1) <45(< 70 < 67 < 67<53 (1) <51 (1) <53< 55 < 54 < 24< 62 < 62 < 64< 20 < 20 < 21< 50 < 50 < 52< 55 < 55 < 65< 41 < 41 < 42< 59 < 58 < 60< 30 < 30 < 31< 8 < 15 < 16< 42 < 40 < 42 U-13< 49* 25* 42<6< 47* 15 (1)* 30<5* 21<15<17* 21<6* 24 (1)<15* 16<12<19<19< 43* 25* 24* 56< 59<43 (1)* 28* 36< 37< 40< 40< 47< 49< 42< 45* 41* 42<5< 29< 52 1) < 67< 47 1) < 57<17< 54< 47< 46< 64<19< 33< 34<13< 59 Q-16* 21< 59< 42<13< 47< 34* 30<11< 49* 36* 40< 49<13* 29< 35* 36* 27< 34< 44* 58<13< 57* 56< 59< 44* 28* 36< 37* 40* 40* 46< 49* 42< 45<41* 42<10* 29* 22* 67< 35< 57<18< 54* 46* 46* 69<19< 33< 34* 30< 59GROUP II Q-37* 60* 61* 23<13< 44< 35* 30<11< 49* 23< 53< 48 (1)(1)< 34* 36* 27< 33* 42< 57< 24< 57*12< 47 (1)* 22< 39< 40 (1)* 53 (1)< 39< 45< 48 (1)* 36* 49 (1)* 22<12* 38<34* 59 (1)* 27* 37 (1)* 24< 53* 29* 66* 69<18< 34< 33 (1)* 62 Q-38* 60* 61< 43<13

<19* 36* 31<11* 51< 24< 55* 50<13* 29< 35* 38* 28< 35< 43< 59< 24< 59< 42* 27<19* 24< 49* 39 (1)<41< 64< 43* 69< 42< 43* 51 (1)* 22*13< 45* 31* 41 (1)* 50* 34 (1)<10* 60* 30* 25* 69<14* 36< 43* 25< 57 Q-41< 49< 59< 42*13< 47< 34*13<11< 49* 36* 40< 49*13* 29* 36 (1)* 27< 34< 44* 58< 24< 57< 57 (1)(1)* 30* 69 (1)< 35* 22< 64* 59 (1)* 68< 43* 52* 27* 23<15< 37< 46* 50* 37 (1)(1)* 23 (1)* 69* 20<17* 68<14< 34< 43* 30* 52 IGROUP III Q-07<17< 45* 20<10* 25* 27* 17<18< 37* 28< 25* 38<10* 23< 34* 30<5* 46<18< 53<15< 41* 31* 60 (1)< 45< 34< 43< 34< 42< 40< 46< 53< 33< 45* 23<41<10* 29< 53* 67< 47< 57<18< 54< 46* 46* 63<19* 58< 34<19< 59 MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCPETIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-I2 60 of 126 TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD 01/02/10 02/05/10 03/05/10 04/02/10 05/07/10 05/21/10 06/04/10 06/18/10 07/03/10 07/16/10 07/30/10 08/13/10 08/27/10 09/10/10 09/24/10 10/10/10 10/23110 11/05/10 12/03/10INDICATOR FARM Q-26< 0.4< 0.6< 1.0< 0.7< 0.8< 0.8< 0.9< 0.9< 0.9< 0.7< 0.7< 0.8< 0.9< 0.7< 0.4< 0.9< 0.8< 0.8< 0.7 MEAN C-13 61 of 126 TABLE C-VII.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA STP COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 4-)Q-26 01/02/10 02/05/10 03/05/10 04/02/10 05/07/10 05/21/10 06/04/10 06/18/10 07/03/10 07/16/10 07/30/10 08/13/10 08/27/10 09/10/10 09/24/10 10/10/10 10/23/10 11/05/10 12/03/10<4<2

<5<6<5<3<6<5

<5<5<5<6<5<5<3<6<6<5<5<5 <13<2 <4<5 <13<7 <16<5 <12<3 <7<7 <15<5 <13<6 <13<5 <12<6 <14<6 <14<6 <15<6 <13<5 <13<7 <16<6 <13<6 <12<6 <15<4 <10<2 <4<6 <12<8 <16<5 <11<2 <6<5 <17<5 <12<6 <13<4 <12<5 <13<5 <14<6 <12<7 <12<5 <9<8 <15<6 <12<7 <12<7 <13<5<2<5<7<6<3<7

<5<6<6<6<5<6<5

<4

<7<5<6<7<8<4<9< 13<9<6< 13<9< 10<9< 12< 10< 11<9<8< 14< 11< 10< 12<3 <5 <45<2 <2 <15<5 <5 <26<6 <7 <36<4 <5 <38<3 <3 <37<9 <7 <45<5 <5 <21<5 <6 <29<4 <5 <25<5 <6 <49<5 <7 <45<5 <5 <48<4 <5 <37<3 <4 <24<6 <7 <29<4 <6 <25<5 <5 <29<5 <6 <37< 14<5< 10<8< 11<9< 11<6<9<6< 10< 13< 12< 12<7<8<9<9< 13 MEAN O' TABLE C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FOOD PRODUCT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Q-CONTROL Onions 07/27/10 Rhubarb Leaves 07/27/10<9 <9 <24 <9 <21 < 10 < 18 <46 <8 < 10 <82< 14 < 16 <39 < 18 <31 < 15 <22 <53 < 10 < 14 <95 MEAN< 25< 32< 24< 26 Q-QUAD Lettuce Potatoes 07/27/10 < 9 < 10 < 25 < 9 07/27/10 < 10 < 12 < 33 < 9< 22 < 10 < 18 <44 < 8 < 9 < 82< 33 < 13 < 20 < 55 < 10 < 12 < 99 MEAN Q-QUAD 2 Potatoes 07/27/10 Rhubarb Leaves 07/27/10 MEAN Q-QUAD 3 Cabbage 07/27/10 Horseradish 07/27/10 Onions 07127/10Rhubarb Leaves 07/27/10 MEAN Q-QUAD 4 Potatoes 07/27/10Rhubarb Leaves 07/27/10<5 <6<10 <9<14 <5<28 <9< 13 < 6 < 10 < 27 < 5<22 < 12 < 18 <56 < 9<5 <48 < 13<9 <94 < 17< 10 < 11 <27 < 9 <22 < 11 <21 < 57 < 8 < 12 < 101 < 27< 12 < 13 < 30 < 10 < 27 < 13 < 24 < 58 < 10 < 12 < 106 < 28<9 < 10 <24 < 8 < 19 < 10 < 19 <56 <9 < 11 <94 <25< 12 < 12 < 36 < 12 < 29 < 14 < 25 < 59 < 11 < 12 < 101 < 34< 10 < 12 <25 < 9 <25 < 10 < 19 < 54 < 9 < 11 < 103 < 22< 10 < 12 <31 < 10 <28 < 12 < 19 <59 < 10 < 10 <90 <25 MEAN ON TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/QUARTER

+/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION CODE Q-01-1 Q-01-2 Q-02-1 Q-02-2 Q-03-1 Q-03-2 Q-04-1 Q-04-2 Q-07-1 Q-07-2 Q-13-1 Q-13-2 Q-16-1 Q-16-2 Q-37-1 Q-37-2 Q-38-1 Q-38-2 Q-41-1 Q-41-2 Q-101-1 Q-101-2 Q-102-1 Q-102-3 Q-103-1 Q-103-2 Q-104-1 Q-104-2 Q-105-1 Q-105-2 Q-106-2 Q-106-3 Q-107-2 Q-107-3 Q-108-1 Q-108-2 Q-109-1 Q-109-2 Q-111-1 Q-111-2 Q-112-1 Q-112-2 Q-113-1 Q-113-2 Q-114-1 Q-114-2 Q-115-1 Q-115-2 Q-116-1 MEAN+/- 2 S.D.27.5 +/- 17.8 28.5 + 19.4 28.0 +/- 19.8 27.5 + 21.1 26.3 +/- 20.4 26.0 +/- 18.6 29.3 +/- 18.2 28.3 +/- 19.3 28.3 +/- 20.4 28.8 +/- 19.8 30.0 + 21.5 28.8 +/- 20.7 27.0 +/- 19.5 26.0 +/- 15.1 29.5 +/- 21.1 29.8 +/- 20.1 29.8 +/- 21.4 28.7 +/- 20.5 27.0 +/- 20.4 26.8 +/- 18.9 26.8 +/- 17.3 27.5 +/- 21.1 28.0 +/- 20.4 27.8 +/- 17.6 27.3 +/- 21.8 26.8 +/- 19.5 27.8 +/- 18.7 26.8 +/- 18.9 26.8 +/- 20.4 28.0 +/- 20.7 27.3 +/- 18.1 27.5 +/- 15.7 27.5 +/- 20.0 28.0 +/- 19.8 27.8 +/- 20.7 26.0 +/- 16.2 27.8 +/- 19.8 27.3 +/- 19.3 31.3 +/- 18.1 30.0 +/- 20.7 28.3 +/- 19.8 27.3 +/- 22.3 28.0 +/- 19.2 25.8 +/- 16.4 26.0 +/- 22.0 29.5 +/- 18.2 29.3 +/- 21.6 27.8 +/- 20.1 29.3 +/- 19.3 JAN -MAR APR -JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC 29 30 27 27 27 25 30 29 29 30 32 29 28 28 29 29 27 (1)27 26 27 27 28 28 25 27 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 28 28 27 29 28 30 26 28 26 29 28 26 32 30 27 30 18 18 19 17 16 17 19 18 18 19 19 19 17 17 19 21 20 20 17 16 17 17 18 20 18 17 19 18 17 17 17 19 17 17 18 19 18 17 20 18 19 17 19 17 15 20 19 19 19 39 41 42 42 40 39 41 41 42 42 44 43 40 35 44 44 45 40 41 39 38 42 42 40 43 40 41 40 41 42 39 38 41 41 42 37 41 40 42 42 42 43 41 36 41 41 44 42 42 (1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)

(1)

(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)

(1)(1)(1)

(1)

(1)(1)(1)(1)

(1)(1)

(1)(1)(1)(1)

(1)(1)24 25 24 24 22 23 27 25 24 24 25 24 23 24 26 25 27 26 23 26 25 24 24 23 23 23 25 23 23 26 26 26 25 26 23 21 23 24 33 (1)34 (1)24 23 23 22 22 25 24 23 26 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-16 64 of 126 TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/QUARTER

+/-2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN JAN -MAR APR -JUN JUL -SEP OCT -DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D.Q-116-3 28.8 +/- 21.4 28 20 44 (1) 23 Q-201-1 29.8 +/- 20.7 30 20 44 (1) 25 Q-201-2 29.5 +/- 19.5 30 21 43 (1) 24 Q-202-1 27.0 +/- 20.7 28 17 41 (1) 22 Q-202-2 26.3 +/- 17.7 27 17 38 (1) 23 Q-203-1 29.0 +/- 21.6 29 19 44 (1) 24 Q-203-2 30.8 +/- 19.1 32 20 43 (1) 28 Q-204-1 29.5 +/- 22.2 29 19 45 (1) 25 Q-204-2 31.3 +/- 23.1 29 22 48 (1) 26 Q-205-1 29.8 +/- 21.4 31 19 44 (1) 25 Q-205-4 30.8 +/- 16.8 31 22 42 (1) 28 Q-206-1 30.0 +/- 20.3 32 19 43 (1) 26 Q-206-2 28.0 +/- 19.5 29 18 41 (1) 24 Q-207-1 27.0 +/- 18.0 28 18 39 (1) 23 Q-207-4 29.8 +/- 25.7 28 18 48 (1) 25 Q-208-1 29.5 +/- 19.4 32 20 42 (1) 24 Q-208-2 28.8 +/- 18.6 30 19 41 (1) 25 Q-209-1 29.0 +/- 21.4 28 19 44 (1) 25 Q-209-4 28.5 +/- 19.8 29 19 42 (1) 24 Q-210-1 29.8 +/- 23.7 31 20 46 (1) 22 Q-210-4 29.5 +/- 21.0 30 20 44 (1) 24 Q-210-5 25.8 +/- 19.8 27 16 39 (1) 21 Q-211-1 30.8 +/- 17.9 31 22 43 (1) 27 Q-211-2 31.5 +/- 19.8 32 22 45 (1) 27 Q-212-1 30.3 +/- 19.1 28 22 44 (1) 27 Q-212-2 28.5 +/- 21.0 29 19 43 (1) 23 Q-213-1 28.8 +/- 20.8 27 18 43 (1) 27 Q-213-2 29.3 +/- 19.5 33 19 41 (1) 24 Q-214-1 31.5 +/- 15.8 29 29 43 (1) 25 Q-214-2 31.0 +/- 22.3 32 20 46 (1) 26 Q-215-1 30.5 +/- 20.2 31 20 44 (1) 27 Q-215-2 29.8 +/- 14.5 29 23 40 (1) 27 Q-216-1 29.0 +/- 20.7 30 19 43 (1) 24 Q-216-2 30.8 +/- 20.7 31 21 45 (1) 26 C-17 65 of 126 TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR THE INNER RING, OUTER RING, OTHER AND CONTROL LOCATION FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/QUARTER STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION PERIOD JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC INNER RING+/- 2 S.D.27.6 +/- 3.0 18.1 +/- 2.5 40.9 +/- 3.7 24.5 +/- 5.6 OUTER RING OTHER CONTROL 29.8 +/- 3.3 19.9 +/- 4.6 43.1 +/- 4.6 24.9 +/- 3.5 28.2 +/- 3.4 18.2 +/- 2.8 41.1 +/- 4.8 24.6 +/- 2.8 29.5 +/- 1.4 18.5 +/- 1.4 42.0 +/- 0.0 24.0 +/- 0.0 TABLE C-IX.3

SUMMARY

OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/QUARTER LOCATION INNER RING OUTER RING OTHER CONTROL SAMPLES PERIOD ANALYZED MINIMUM PERIOD MAXIMUM 120 132 71 8 15 16 16 18 44 48 45 42 PERIOD MEAN+/- 2 S.D.27.8 +/- 17.2 29.4 +/- 17.8 28.0 +/- 17.3 28.5 +/- 18.6INNER RING STATIONS -Q-101-1, Q-101-2, Q-102-1, Q-102-3, Q-103-1, Q-103-2, Q-104-1, Q-104-2, Q-105-1, Q-105-2, Q-106-2, Q-106-3, Q-107-2, Q-107-3, Q-108-1, Q-108-2, Q-109-1, Q-109-2, Q-111-1, Q-111-2, Q-112-1, Q-112-2, Q-113-1, Q-113-2, Q-114-1, Q-114-2, Q-1 15-1, Q-115-2, Q-116-1, Q-116-3 OUTER RING STATIONS -Q-201-1, Q-201-2, Q-202-1, Q-202-2, Q-203-1, Q-203-2, Q-204-1, Q-204-2, Q-205-1, Q-205-4, Q-206-1, Q-206-2, Q-207-1, Q-207-4, Q-208-1, Q-208-2, Q-209-1, Q-209-4, Q-210-1, Q-210-4, Q-210-5, Q-211-1, Q-211-2, Q-212-1, Q-212-2, Q-213-1, Q-213-2, Q-214-1, Q-214-2, Q-215-1, Q-215-2, Q-216-.1, Q-216-2 OTHER STATIONS -Q-01-1, Q-01-2, Q-02-1, Q-02-2, Q-03-1, Q-03-2, Q-04-1, Q-04-2, Q-13-1, Q-13-2, Q-16-1, Q-16-2, Q-37-1, Q-37-2, Q-38-1, Q-38-2, Q-41-1, Q-41-2 CONTROL STATIONS -Q-07-1, Q-07-2 C-18 66 of 126 FIGURE C-1 Surface Water -Gross Beta -Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C)Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 -2004 Q-33 Cordova 12.0 T No samples;water frozen.10.0o 8.0-6.0.4.0-2.0-No samples;water frozen.K1A U.U 01-00 I r * !12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-34 (C) Camanche 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2,0 No samples;water frozen.,U 0,0 1 ! I i 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-19 67 of 126 FIGURE C-1 (cont.)Surface Water -Gross Beta -Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C)Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 -2010 Q-33 Cordova 12.0 -10.0 +8.0 +-J C.)6.0 +hp&mviA 4.0 +2.0 +0.0 01-0402-18-06 05-08-07 07-25-08 10-12-09 12-30-10 Q-34 (C) Camanche 12.0 T 10.0 +8.0 +C.L 03.6.0 +Cr%4.0 +2.0 +0.0 i 12-01-0402-18-06 05-08-07 07-25-08 10-12-09 12-30-10 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE, < VALUES ARE LLD VALUES JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2005 AND MDC VALUES AFTER JULY 2005 C-20 68 of 126 FIGURE C-2 Surface Water -Tritium -Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C)Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 -2004 Q-33 Cordova 500 400 300 CL 200 100 0-1-100 131i 01-01-00 12-31-00l l I lI -1 I 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-34 (C) Camanche 500 T 400+300-_J 0 0-.200+/-1001 0+-100 t 01-01-00 12-31-00 i I I I I I -3I 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-21 69 of 126 FIGURE C-2 (cont.)Surface Water -Tritium -Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C)Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 -2010 Q-33 Cordova 500 400 300 200 100-J 0.0 4-03-01-0505-01-06 07-01-07 08-30-08 10-30-09 12-30-10 Q-34 (C) Camanche 500 T 400 +300 +-I 200 100 +0 01-0505-01-06 07-01-07 08-30-08 10-30-09 12-30-10 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE, < VALUES ARE LLD VALUES JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2005 AND MDC VALUES AFTER JULY 2005 C-22 70 of 126 FIGURE C-3 Ground Water -Tritium -Stations Q-35 and Q-36 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 -2004 Q-35 McMillan Well CJ C, 500 400 300 200 100 N-100-200 I 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 0-12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-36 Cordova Well C, c~.500 400 300 200 100--100-200 I 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01/12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-23 71 of 126 FIGURE C-3 (cont.)Ground Water -Tritium -Stations Q-35 and Q-36 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 -2010 Q-35 McMillan Well 500 400 300 200 100-L C.)1 //- ---- , "---- --\/=--- -0 i 03-31-0505-25-06 07-19-07 09-11-08 11-05-09 12-30-10 Q-36 Cordova Well 500 T 400 +300 +0.CL 200 100 0 31-0505-25-06 07-19-07 09-11-08 11-05-09 12-30-10 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE, < VALUES ARE LLD VALUES JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2005 AND MDC VALUES AFTER JULY 2005 C-24 72 of 126 FIGURE C-4 Air Particulates

-Gross Beta- Stations Q-01 and Q-02 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 -2004 Q-01 Onsite No. I 10.0 N 9 MJ a 8.0 6.0 4.0 0.01 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-02 Onsite No. 2 10.0 8.0 6.0 4,0 U3 a.N ,9, 2.0 0.0 -.--01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-25 73 of 126 FIGURE C-4 (cont.)Air Particulates

-Gross Beta- Stations Q-01 and Q-02 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 -2010 Q-01 Onsite No. I 60.0 50.0 40.0 E 5 0. 30.0 9 o 20.0 10.0 0.0 I 01-07-0503-20-06 05-31-07 08-10-08 10-21-09 01-01-11 Station Q-01 lost power 10-07 10-21-05.Q-02 Onsite No. 2 C', m 9 0U 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 4-01-07-0503-20-06 05-31-07 08-10-08 10-21-09 01-01-11 Station Q-02 lost power 08-19-05 26-05.DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-26 74 of 126 FIGURE C-5 Air Particulates

-Gross Beta- Stations Q-03 and Q-04 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 -2004 Q-03 Onsite No. 3 10.0 8.0 C, a.N 9 w 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 4--01-01-00 12.31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-04 Nitrin 10,0 8.0 N 9.w=6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 b-01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-27 75 of 126 FIGURE C-5 (cont.)Air Particulates

-Gross Beta- Stations Q-03 and Q-04 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 -2010 Q-03 Onsite No. 3 60.0 50.0 c 40.0 E CL 20.0 10.0 0.0 07-0503-20-06 05-31-07 08-10-08 10-21-09 01-01-11 Q-04 Nitrin 60.0 50.0 40.0 E CL 30.0 9 0L 20.0 10.0 0.0 1 01-07-0503-20-06 05-31-07 08-10-08 10-21-09 01-01-11 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-28 76 of 126 FIGURE C-6 Air Particulates

-Gross Beta- Stations Q-07 (C)Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 -2010 Q-07 (C) Clinton N C?10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-07 (C) Clinton 60.0 50.0 40.0 E 0- 30.0 o 20.0 10.0 0.0 101-07-0503-20-06 05-31-07 08-10-08 10-21-09 01-01-11 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-29 77 of 126 FIGURE C-7 Air Particulates

-Gross Beta- Stations Q-13 and Q-16 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 -2010 Q-13 Princeton 60.0 50.0 M 40.0 E"L 30.0 9 20.0 10.0 0.0 08-0508-12-06 09-16-07 10-20-08 11-24-09 12-29-10 Q-16 Low Moor 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 I 07-08-0508-12-06 09-16-07 10-20-08 11-24-09 12-29-10 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA ANALYSES OF FAR FIELD LOCATIONS STARTED IN JULY 2005 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-30 78 of 126 FIGURE C-8 Air Particulates

-Gross Beta- Stations Q-37 and Q-38 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 -2010 Q-37 Meredosia Road 60.0 50.0 40.0 CL 30.0 Cl 9 w o 20.0 10.0 0.0 08-05 08-12-06 09-16-07 10-20-08 11-24-09 12-29-10 STATION Q-37 YEILDED AN INSUFFICIENT RUN TIME FOR SAMPLE TO BE OBTAINED 10/23/09 -10/30/09 Q-38 Fuller Road 60.0 50.0 40.0 E 53 C. 30.0 9 o 20.0 10.0 0.0 I 07-08-0508-12-06 09-16-07 10-20-08 11-24-09 12-29-10 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA ANALYSES OF FAR FIELD LOCATIONS STARTED IN JULY 2005 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-31 79 of 126 FIGURE C-9 Air Particulates

-Gross Beta- Stations Q-41 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2009 -2010 Q-41 Camanche 50.0 40.0 30.0, 20.0 UL C 10.0 0.0 I-01-03-09 05-28-09 10-20-09 03-14-10 08-06-10 12-29-10 C-32 80 of 126 APPENDIX D INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 81 of 126 Intentionally left blank 82 of 126 TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2010 (PAGE 1 OF 3)Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

March 2010 E6978-396 E6979-396 Milk Milk Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi/L 89.3 92.8 pCi/L 13.8 12.7 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi 65.2 241 388 157 150 143 202 146 247 177 211 304 142 131 119 162 110 217 145 74.0 261 361 178 158 143 207 137 254 183 185 255 125 111 101 146 97 179 129 E6981-396 AP Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 E6980-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 80.2 85.6 pCi/L 82.0 93.4 pCi/L 15.8 16.7 0.96 1.09 0.88 0.92 1.07 0.88 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.07 0.97 0.97 1.14 1.19 1.14 1.18 1.18 1.11 1.14 1.21 1.12 0.94 0.88 0.95 0.86 0.97 0.96 0.90 0.96 0.91 0.98 1.02 0.96 0.96 0.97 1.04 0.96 1.06 1.04 1.07 1.06 0.98 1.04 0.96 A A A A A A A A A

A A A A A A A A A A W A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A June 2010 E7132-396 Milk E7133-396 Milk Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi 83.5 107 325 114 144 92.3 165 121 197 190 88.4 292 101 132 87.3 150 105 168 170 96.9 110 339 126 150 101 169 119 206 197 91.6 282 105 125 84.0 140 98.6 171 163 E7135-396 AP Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60E7134-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 76.4 79.9 A D-1 83 of 126 TABLE D-1ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2010 (PAGE 2 OF 3)Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)September 2010 E7229-396 E7230-396 E7232-396 Milk Milk Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi/L 85.0 92.8 pCi/L 12.6 14.7 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi 80.2 130 235 83.2 95.1 77.3 121 96.4 216 172 122 228 79.9 93.8 71.5 113 73.8 186 163 94.1 130 234 93.0 94.5 73.7 119 91.1 204 171 119 214 85.3 86.7 67.6 110 83.6 187 157 AP Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 0.92 0.86 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.01 1.05 1.02 1.06 1.06 1.01 1.03 1.07 0.94 1.08 1.06 1.03 0.88 0.99 1.04 1.04 0.95 1.00 0.91 E7231-396 Charcoal 1-131 December 2010 E7375-396 E7376-396 Milk Milk Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 pCi/L 62.3 59.9 pCi/L 92.7 98.0 pCi/L 13.5 13.5 pCi/L 87.9 96.9 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 E7378-396 AP Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi/L not provided by Analytics for this study pCi/L 389 456 0.85 pCi/L 137 157 0.87 pCi/L 172 186 0.92 pCi/L 84.3 90.2 0.93 pCi/L 120 120 1.00 pCi/L 134 131 1.02 pCi/L 162 174 0.93 pCi/L 284 301 0.94 pCi not provided by Analytics for this study pCi 387 365 1.06 PCi 135 126 1.07 pCi 157 149 1.05 pCi 73.6 72.3 1.02 pCi 88.7 96 0.92 pCi 127 105 1.21 pCi 151 139 1.09 pCi 249 241 1.03 A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A W A A D-2 84 of 126 TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2010(PAGE 3 OF 3)Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)December 2010 E7377-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 79.6 84.2 0.95 A (a)(b)(c)(d)Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.Analytics evaluation based on TBE intemal QC limits: A= Acceptable.

Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W-Acceptable with warning. Reported result falls within 0. 70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30.

N = Not Acceptable.

Reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0. 70 and > 1.30.D-3 85 of 126 TABLE D-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2010 (PAGE 1 OF 1)Identification Reported Known Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Control Limits Evaluation (c)May 2010 RAD-81 Water Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-133 Cs- 134 Cs-137 Co-60 Zn-65 Gr-A Gr-B 1-131 H-3 Water Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-133 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-60 Zn-65 Gr-A Gr-B 1-131 H-3 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L 64.4 37.8 66.4 66.43 137.33 83.33 177 26.37 28.77 26.27 12967 77.8 39.3 70.3 39.9 117 53.5 11.0 35.1 35.5 27.9 13233 60.4 41.3 65.9 71.6 146 84.5 186 32.9 37.5 26.4 12400 68.5 43.0 68.9 43.2 123 53.4 102 42.3 36.6 27.5 12900 48.6 -68.2 30.4 -47.4 54.9 -72.5 58.4 -78.8 131 -163 76.0 -95.3 167-219 16.9 -42.6 24.7 -45.0 21.9-31.1 10800 -13600 55.8 -76.7 31.7 -49.3 57.5 -75.8 34.5 -47.5 111-138 48.1 -61.3 91.8-122 21.9-53.7 24.0 -44.2 22.9 -32.311200 -14200 A A A A A A A A A A AN (1)A A A A A N (2)A A A A November 2010 RAD-83 (1) Sr-89 TBE to known ratio of 1. 14 fell within acceptable range of

+/- 20%. No action required.

NCR 10-09 (2) Zn-65 result of 111 was incorrectly reported as 11.0. No action required.

NCR 10-09 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.(c) ERA evaluation:

A=acceptable.

Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result fallsoutside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.D-4 86 of 126 TABLE D-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2010 (PAGE I OF 2)Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)March 2010 10-MaW22 10-GrW22 Water Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-57 Co-60 H-3 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 Water Gr-A Gr-B 10-MaS22 Soil Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 K-40 Sr-90 Zn-65 10-RdF22 10-GrF22 10-RdV22 AP Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 AP Gr-A Gr-B Vegetation Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 Water Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-60 H-3 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 Water Gr-A Gr-B Bq/L -0.0942 Bq/L 58.5 Bq/L 27.2 Bq/L 0.0226 Bq/L 104 Bq/L 26.6 Bq/L 0.1029 Bq/L 42.0 Bq/L 0.5173 Bq/L 3.98 Bq/kg 665 Bq/kg 800 Bq/kg 508 Bq/kg 648 Bq/kg 893 Bq/kg 597 Bq/kg 221 Bq/kg -4.97 Bq/sample 1.81 Bq/sample 1.70 Bq/sample 0.0056 Bq/sample 2.65 Bq/sample 3.70 Bq/sample 0.0523 Bq/sample

-0.0627Bq/sample 0.1533 Bq/sample 1.240 Bq/sample 4.48 Bq/sample 3.43 Bq/sample

-0.0117 Bq/sample 3.55 Bq/sample 0.007 Bq/sample

-0.0002 Bq/sample 8.12 Bq/L 27.1 Bq/L 41.8 Bq/L 33.2 Bq/L 26.5 Bq/L 500 Bq/L 0.024 Bq/L 8.10 Bq/L 30.8 Bq/L 2.36 Bq/L 6.37 2.13 1.49-2.77 1.53 1.07-1.99 (1)2.473 1.731 -3.215 3.02 2.11 -3.93 (1)(1)(1)60.6 42.4 -78.8 28.3 19.8-36.8 (1)90.8 63.6- 118.0 26.9 18.8 -35.0 (1)40.7 28.5

-52.9 0.676 0.00- 1.352 3.09 1.55 -4.64 733 779 522 622 849 559 288 513-953 545-1013 365-679 435-809 594-1104 391 -727 202-374 (1)A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A W A A A A A W A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 0.0427 1.29 4.39 3.06 3.27 7.10 31.4 44.2 36.0 28.3 453.4 8.3 31.0 0.00 -0.854 0.65-1.94 3.07 -5.71 2.14-3.98 (1)2.29 -4.25 (1)(1)4.97 -9.23 22.0 -40.8 30.9 -57.5 25.2 -46.8 19.8-36.8 317.4 -589.4 (1)5.8- 10.8 21.7 -40.3 0.58 -3.26 2.20 -6.59 September 2010 10-MaW23 10-GrW23 1.92 4.39 D-5 87 of 126 TABLE D-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2010 (PAGE 2 OF 2)Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)September 2010 10-MaS23 Soil Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 K-40 Sr-90 Zn-65 10-RdF23 10-GrF23 10-RdV23 AP Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 AP Gr-A Gr-B Vegetation Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Co-57 Co-60 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 Bq/kg 837 Bq/kg 680 Bq/kg 2.78 Bq/kg 350 Bq/kg 853 Bq/kg 721 Bq/kg 2.24 Bq/kg 287 Bq/sample 2.31 Bq/sample

-0.025 Bq/sample 3.64 Bq/sample 2.81 Bq/sample 3.19 Bq/sample 1.01 Bq/sample 0.0310Bq/sample 0.004 Bq/sample 0.473 Bq/sample 4.90 Bq/sample 6.78 Bq/sample 10.2 Bq/sample 0.00 Bq/sample 7.36 Bq/sample 2.53 Bq/sample 6.40 940 658-1222 670 469-871 (1)343 240-446 820 574- 1066 699 489 -909 (1)265 186-345 2.98 2.09 -3.87 (1)4.08 2.86 -5.3802.92 2.04

-3.80 3.18 2.23-4.13 1.01 0.71 -1.31 (1)(1)0.50 0.25 -0.75 4.79 3.35 -6.235.88 4.12

-7.64 8.27 5.79 -10.75 (1)6.287 4.401 -8.173 2.63 1.84 -3.42 5.3900 3.77 -7.01 A A A A A A A A W A A A A A A A A A A W A A A A (1) False positive test.(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.(c) DOEIMAPEP evaluation:

A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.

D-6 88 of 126 TABLE D-4 ERA (a) STATISTICAL

SUMMARY

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAMa ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2010 (Page 1 of 1)Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory Resultb Concentration (pCi/L)ERA Control Resultc Limits Acceptance STW-1205 STW-1205 STW-1206 STW-1206 STMW-1206 STW-1206 STW-1206 04/05/10 04/05/10 04/05/10 04/05/10 04/05/10 04/05/10 04/05/10 Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-1 33 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Zn-65 STW-1207 04/05/10 Gr. Alpha STW-1207 04/05/10 Gr. BetaSTW-1208 04/05/10 1-131STW-1210 04/05/10 H-3 STW-1224 10/04/10 Sr-89 STW-1224 10/04/10 Sr-90 63.0 +/- 5.7 37.4 +/- 2.4 63.6 +/- 3.3 83.3 +/- 2.9 71.0 +/- 3.4 145.5 +/- 5.1 194.9 +/- 7.8 26.5 +/- 1.7 34.5 +/- 1.6 22.7 +/- 0.8 12955 +/- 332 65.3 +/- 5.7 39.9 +/- 2.3 67.2 +/- 4.3 53.2 +/- 3.3 47.3 +/- 5.1 118.0 +/-5.9 107.0 +/- 8.7 30.7 +/- 2.9 32.7 +/- 0.8 28.6 +/- 1.1 13682 +/- 352 60.4 41.3 65.9 84.5 71.6 146.0 186.0 32.9 37.5 26.4 48.6 -68.2 30.4 -47.4 54.9 -72.5 76.0 -95.3 58.4 -78.8131.0 -163.0 167.0 -219.0 16.9 -42.6 24.7 -45.0 21.9 -31.1 12400.0 10800 -13600 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass STW-1225 STW-1225 STW-1225 STW-1225 STW-1225 10/04/10 10/04/10 10/04/10 10/04/10 10/04/10 Ba-133 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Zn-65 68.5 43.0 68.9 53.4 43.2 123.0 102.0 42.3 36.6 27.555.8 -76.7 31.7 -49.3 57.5 -75.8 48.1 -61.3 34.5 -47.5 111.0 -138.0 91.8-122.0 21.9 -53.7 24.0 -44.2 STW-1226 10/04/10 Gr. Alpha STW-1226 10/04/10 Gr. Beta STW-1227 10/04/10 1-131 STW-1229 10/04/10 H-3 22.9 -32.3 12900.0 11200 -14200 a Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiency testing in drinking water conducted by Environmental Resources Associates (ERA).b Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratory result is given as the mean +/- standard deviation for three determinations.

c Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as provided by ERA.D-7 89 of 126 TABLE D-5DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)a ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2010 (Page 1 of 3)Concentration b Known Control Lab Code c Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits d Acceptance STVE-1 199 STVE-1 199 STVE-1 199 STVE-1 199 STVE-1 199 STVE-1 199 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Mn-54 Zn-65 0.01 +/- 0.03 3.39 +/- 0.12 4.74 +/- 0.15 3.32 +/- 0.17 0.01 +/- 0.05 8.03 +/- 0.33 0.40 +/- 0.05 3.03 +/- 0.07 0.00 3.27 4.39 3.06 0.00 7.10 0.68 3.09 2.29 -4.25 3.07 -5.71 2.14 -3.98 4.97 -9.23 0.00 -1.35 1.55 -4.64 STW-1 200 03/01/10 Gr. AlphaSTW-1200 03/01/10 Gr. Beta STW-1 201 STW-1201 STW-1201 STW-1201 STW-1201 STW-1201 ST-W-1201 STW-1201 STSO-1202 STSO-1202 STSO-1202 STSO-1202 STSO-1202 STSO-1202 STSO-1202 STSO-1202 STAP-1203 STAP-1203 STAP-1203 STAP-1203 STAP-1203 STAP-1203 STAP-1203 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 03/01/10 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 H-3 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 K-40 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 Co-57 Co-60 Cs- 134 Cs-1 37 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 28.90 +/- 0.40 0.06 +/- 0.05-0.03 +/- 0.09 60.60 +/- 0.60 93.20 +/- 18.30 27.80 +/- 0.40-0.10 +/- 0.60 42.70 +/- 0.80 520.00 +/- 10.80 599.10 +/- 2.80 -666.10 +/- 4.70 774.40 +/- 4.50 562.00 +/- 15.30 866.20 +/- 4.60 225.50 +/- 11.80-1.23 +/- 1.96 0.01 +/- 0.02 2.63 +/- 0.19 2.21 +/- 0.34 1.66 +/- 0.22 3.42 +/- 0.26 0.02 +/- 0.06-0.05 +/- 0.11 0.13 +/- 0.03 1.46 +/- 0.07 28.30 0.00 0.00 60.60 90.80 26.90 0.00 40.70 522.00 622.00 733.00 779.00 559.00 849.00 288.00 0.00 0.00 2.47 2.13 1.53 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.43 1.2919.80 -36.80 42.40 -78.80 63.60 -118.0018.80 -35.00 28.50 -52.90 365.00 -679.00 435.00 -809.00513.00 -953.00 545.00 -1013.00 391.00 -727.00 594.00 -1104.00 202.00 -374.00 1.73 -3.22 1.49 -2.77 1.07-1.99 2.11 -3.93 0.00 -0.85 0.65-1.94 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass STAP-1204 03/01/10 Gr. Alpha STAP-1204 03/01/10 Gr. Beta D-8 90 of 126 TABLE D-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)a ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2010 (Page 2 of 3)Concentration b Known Control Lab Code c Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits d Acceptance STW-1211 STW-1211 STW-1211 STW-1211 STW-1211 STW-1211 STW-1211 STW-1211 STW-1211 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 STW-1212 08/01/10 Gr. Alpha STW-1212 08/01/10 Gr. Beta STVE-1213 STVE-1213 STVE-1213 STVE-1213 STVE-1 213 STVE-1 213 STSO-1214 STSO-1214 STSO-1214 STSO-1214 STSO-1214 STSO-1214 STSO-1214 STSO-1214 STAP-1215 STAP-1215 STAP-1215 STAP-1 215 STAP-1 215 STAP-1215 STAP-1215 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 08/01/10 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Mn-54 Zn-65 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 K-40 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 36.40 +/- 4.80 28.30 +/- 1.00 29.30 +/- 2.10 44.60 +/- 1.80 503.60 +/- 12.80 38.50 +/- 2.50 0.10 +/- 0.30 9.20 +/- 1.30 32.80 +/- 3.00 1.54 +/- 0.09 4.13 +/- 0.15 9.60 +/- 0.54 0.05 +/- 0.08 4.83 +/- 0.26 6.45 +/- 0.66 7.12 +/- 0.66 6.05 +/- 0.74 0.10 +/- 1.60 370.00 +/- 6.00 1005.00 +/- 21.00 755.00 +/- 15.00 783.00 +/- 54.00 942.00 +/- 15.00 3.50 +/- 8.00 310.00 +/- 18.00 4.47 +/- 0.21 3.15 +/- 0.30 3.03 +/- 0.170.01 +/- 0.05 3.69 +/- 0.39 1.00 +/- 0.12 0.03 +/- 0.15 36.00 28.30 31.40 44.20 453.40 38.90 0.00 8.30 31.00 1.92 4.39 8.27 0.00 4.79 5.88 6.29 5.39 0.00 343.00 940.00 670.00 699.00 820.00 0.00 265.00 4.08 2.92 2.98 0.00 3.18 1.01 0.00 25.20 -46.80 19.80 -36.8022.00 -40.80 30.90 -57.50 317.40 -589.40 27.20 -50.60 5.80 -10.8021.70 -40.30 0.58 -3.26 2.20 -6.59 5.79 -10.75 3.35 -6.23 4.12 -7.64 4.40 -8.17 3.77 -7.01 240.00 -446.00 658.00 -1222.00 469.00 -871.00 489.00 -909.00 574.00 -1066.00 186.00 -345.00 2.86 -5.30 2.04 -3.80 2.09 -3.87 2.23 -4.130.71 -1.31 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass D-9 91 of 126 TABLE D-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)a ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2010 (Page 3 of 3)Concentration b Known Control Lab Code c Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits d Acceptance STAP-1216 08/01/10 Gr. Alpha 0.01 +/- 0.01 0.00 -PassSTAP-1216 08/01/10 Gr. Beta 0.54 +/- 0.05 0.50 0.25 -0.75 Pass a Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program, Idaho Operations office, Idaho Falls, Idaho b Results are reported in units of Bq/kg (soil), Bq/L (water) or Bq/total sample (filters, vegetation).

c Laboratory codes as follows: STW (water), STAP (air filter), STSO (soil), STVE (vegetation).

d MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as defined by the MAPEP.e Included in the testing series as a "false positive".

D-10 92 of 126 APPENDIX E ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM REPORT (ARGPPR)93 of 126 Intentionally left blank 94 of 126 Docket No: 50-254 50-265 QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1 and 2 Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report 1 January Through 31 December 2010 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Exel n.Nuclear Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Cordova, IL 61242 May 2011 95 of 126 Intentionally left blank 96 of 126 Table Of Contents I. Sum m ary and Conclusion

............................................................................................

1 I1. Introduction

.............................................................................................................

4 A. O bjectives of the RG PP ..................................................................................

4B. Im plem entation of the O bjectives

..................................................................

4 C. Program Description

......................................................................................

5 III. Program Description

................................................................................................

5 A. Sam ple Analysis ..............................................................................................

6 B. Data Interpretation

..........................................................................................

6 IV. Results and Discussion

............................................................................................

7 A. G roundwater Results

.....................................................................................

7 B. Surface W ater Results ..................................................................................

8 C. Summary of Results -Inter-laboratory Comparison Program .......................

8 D. Leaks, Spills, and Releases ...........................................................................

8 E. Trends ............................................................................................................

8 F. Investigations

...................................................................................................

8 G .Actions Taken ................................................................................................

9 97 of 126 AppendicesAppendix A Tables Table A-1 Figqures Figure A-1 Figure A-2Appendix B Tables Table B-1.1 Table B-1.2 Table B-11.1 Table B-11.2 Table B-Ill.1 Location Designation Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010Sampling Locations Near the Site Boundary of the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Sentinel Monitoring Point Locations, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Data Tables Concentrations of Tritium and Strontium in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.

Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010.Concentrations of Tritium in Groundwater Samples Collected and Anaylzed by Quad Cities Station Personnel, 2010.98 of 126

1. Summary and Conclusions This report on the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP)conducted for the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (QCNPS) by Exelon Nuclear covers the period 01 January 2010 through 31 December 2010.In 2006, Exelon undertook a Fleetwide Assessment of groundwater at and in the vicinity of its nuclear power generating facilities for the presence of radionuclides.

The data collected from the Quad Cities Station as part of the Fleetwide Assessment was summarized in a report entitled"Hydrogeologic Investigation Report, Fleetwide Assessment, Quad Cities Generation Station, Cordova, Illinois", dated September 2006. This report was submitted to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) in September 2006. The Quad Cities Hydrogeologic Investigation Report concluded that tritium had not migrated off Site at detectable concentrations.

Following the Fleetwide Assessment, Exelon continued groundwater monitoring for radionuclides at the Site. As a result of this monitoring, Exelon detected higher than expected tritium levels in the vicinity of the station's Service Building and Turbine Building.

Quad Cities undertook supplemental investigative activities to determine and characterize the source of the tritium. These investigative activities included completion of an aquifer pumping test, installation of sentinel monitoring wells in the vicinity of the Service Building and Turbine Building, and several additional rounds of hydraulic monitoring and groundwater sampling.

The collected groundwater data was utilized to assist with an extensive underground piping inspection program to locate the source of the tritium.In May 2008, during the underground piping inspection program, Exelon located a small leak in the Unit 1 Residual Heat Removal (RHR) suction line located near the Service Building/

Turbine Building area. The line was isolated and through further testing, Exelon determined it to be a source of the monitored tritium levels. In June 2008, the line was repaired, thereby eliminating this source of tritiated water.In a letter dated June 5, 2008, Exelon informed the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) of its plan to prepare a Migration Control Plan (MCP) to minimize migration of the tritium plume offsite.

The MCP was submitted to the IEPA July 17, 2008. The MCP listed Monitored Natural Attenuation as the preferred remediation option.-1-99 of 126 This report covers groundwater samples, collected from the environment on station property in 2010. During that time period, RGPP samples were collected from 54 locations.

2010 sample locations included twenty-seven designated monitoring wells, two surface water monitoring points, eight production wells (three of which are used for site drinking water) and 17 sentinel wells. Two additional sentinel wells (QC-GP-1 6 & QC-GP-1 7) were installed May 2010 along the west wall of the service bldg. in the vicinity of the contaminated condensate storage tanks. Sample frequency and analysis varies with well designation.

Typical frequency / analysis include quarterly for tritium, annually for gamma, and biannual for Sr-90.Samples from the twenty-seven designated monitoring wells were collected by a contractor (Environmental Inc.) and analyzed by a contract lab (Teledyne Brown). The remaining sample locations are collected quarterly (at a minimum)by site personnel and analyzed for tritium by Teledyne Brown or onsite by station personnel.

Tritium concentrations ranged from less than the LLD of 200 pCi/L at the site boundaries up to 534,000 pCi/L in a sentinel well. Tritium concentrations ranged from less than the LLD of 200 pCi/L to 431 pCi/L in surface water monitoring locations.

Gamma-emitting radionuclides associated with licensed plant operations were not detected at concentrations greater than their respective Lower Limits of Detection (LLDs) as specified in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) in any of the groundwater samples. In the case of tritium, Exelon specified that it's laboratories achieve a lower limit of detection 10 times lower than that required by federal regulation.

Most of the tritium that was detected in groundwater at the Station is on the south and west side of the Reactor / Turbine buildings.

Strontium-90 was not detected at concentrations greater than the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) of 1.0 pCi/L.In assessing all the data gathered for this report, it was concluded that the operation of QCNPS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment offsite of QCNPS.-2-100 of 126 Intentionally left blank-3-101 of 126 II. Introduction The Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (QCNPS), consisting of two 2957 MWth boiling water reactor owned and operated by Exelon Corporation, is located in Cordova, Illinois along the Mississippi River. Unit No. 1 went critical on 16 March 1972. Unit No. 2 went critical on 02 December 1973. The site is located in northern Illinois, approximately 182 miles west of Chicago, Illinois.A. Objective of the RGPP The long-term objectives of the RGPP are as follows: 1. Identify suitable locations to monitor and evaluate potential impacts from station operations before significant radiological impact to the environment and potential drinking water sources.2. Understand the local hydrogeologic regime in the vicinity of the station and maintain up-to-date knowledge of flow patterns on the surface and shallow subsurface.

3. Perform routine water sampling and radiological analysis of water from selected locations.

4. Report new leaks, spills, or other detections with potential radiological significance to stakeholders in a timely manner.5. Regularly assess analytical results to identify adverse trends.6. Take necessary corrective actions to protect groundwater resources.

B. Implementation of the Objectives The objectives identified have been implemented at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station as discussed below: 1. Exelon and its consultant identified locations as described in the Phase 1 study. Phase 1 studies were conducted by Conestoga Rovers and Associates (CRA) and the results and conclusions were made available to state and federal regulators in station specific reports.2. The Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station reports describe the local hydrogeologic regime. Periodically, the flow patterns on the-4-102 of 126 surface and shallow subsurface are updated based on ongoing measurements.

3. Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station will continue to perform routine sampling and radiological analysis of water from selected locations.

4. Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station has implemented procedures to identify and report leaks, spills, or other detections with potential radiological significance in a timely manner.5. Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station staff and consulting hydrogeologist assess analytical results on an ongoing basis to identify adverse trends.C. Program Description1 .Sample Collection Sample locations can be found in Table A-1 and Figures A-1 & A-2, Appendix A.Groundwater and Surface Water Samples of water are collected, managed, transported and analyzed in accordance with approved procedures following regulatory methods. Both groundwater and surface water are collected.

Sample locations, sample collection frequencies and analytical frequencies are controlled in accordance with approved station procedures.

Contractor and/or station personnel are trained in the collection, preservation management, analysis, and shipment of samples, as well as in documentation of sampling events.Analytical laboratories are subject to internal quality assurance programs, inter-laboratory cross-check programs, as well as nuclear industry audits. Station personnel review and evaluate all analytical data deliverables after initial review by the contractor.

Analytical data results are reviewed by both station personnel and an independent hydrogeologist for adverse trends or changes to hydrogeologic conditions.

Ill. Program Description This section covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) on samples collected in 2010.-5-103 of 126 A. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE and station personnel to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station RGPP in 2010.In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses: 1. Concentrations of gamma emitters in groundwater and surface water.2. Concentrations of strontium in groundwater and surface water.3. Concentrations of tritium in groundwater and surface water.B. Data Interpretation The radiological data collected prior to Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station becoming operational were used as a baseline with which these operational data were compared.

For the purpose of this report, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station was considered operational at initial criticality.

Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data: 1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) is specified by federal regulation as a minimum sensitivity value that must be achieved routinely by the analytical parameter.

2. Laboratory Measurements Uncertainty The estimated uncertainty in measurement of tritium in environmental samples is frequently on the order of 50% of the measurement value.Statistically, the exact value of a measurement is expressed as a range with a stated level of confidence.

The convention is to report results with a 95% level of confidence.

The uncertainty comes from calibration standards, sample volume or weight measurements, sampling uncertainty and other factors. Exelon reports the uncertainty of a measurement created by statistical process (counting error) as well as all sources of error (Total Propagated Uncertainty or TPU). Each result has two values calculated.

Exelon reports the TPU by following the result with plus-6-104 of 126 or minus +/- the estimated sample standard deviation, as TPU, that is obtained by propagating all sources of analytical uncertainty in measurements.

Analytical uncertainties are reported at the 95% confidence level in this report for reporting consistency with the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR).Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows: For groundwater and surface water 14 nuclides, Be-7, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Nb-95, Zr-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140 and La-140 were reported.

IV. Results and Discussion A. Groundwater Results Groundwater Samples were collected from on-site wells in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. Analyticalresults and anomalies are discussed below.Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-1.1 & B-Ill.1 Appendix B). Tritium values ranged from the detection limit to 534,000 pCi/I. All samples obtained at the site boundaries were less then the detection limit of 200 pCi/L. The location most representative of potential offsite user of drinking water was <200 pCi/L.Strontium Strontium-90 was not detected above the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) of 1.0 pCi/L (Table B-1.1 Appendix B)

Gamma Emitters Naturally occurring Potassium-40 was detected in five of 17 samples. The concentrations ranged from 34 pCi/liter to 126 pCi/liter.

No other gamma emitting nuclides were detected (Table-7-105 of 126 B-1.2, Appendix B)B. Surface Water Results Surface Water Tritium Samples from two locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-11.1 Appendix B). Tritium was detected above the detection limit of 200 pCi/I in three of 4 samples. The concentrations ranged from 227 to 431 pCi/L.Strontium Strontium-90 was not detected above the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) of 1.0 pCi/L (Table B-I1.1 Appendix B)Gamma Emitters No gamma emitting nuclides were detected. (Table B-II.2, Appendix B)C. Summary of Results -Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program results for TBE are presented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.

D. Leaks, Spills, and Releases No leaks, spills or releases were identified during the year.E. Trends Total plume activity decreased during 2010 from 630,000 pCi/L January 2010 to 375,000 pCi/L January 2011.F. Investigations Currently no investigations are on-going.-8-106 of 126 G. Actions Taken 1. Compensatory Actions There have been no station events requiring compensatory actions at the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station in 2010.2. Installation of Monitoring Wells Two new wells were installed during the year to provide additional monitoring in a susceptible area.3. Actions to Recover/Reverse Plumes No actions were required to recover or reverse groundwater plumes.Quad Cities Station Migration Control Plan (MCP) continues to employ Monitored Natural Attenuation for remediation of H-3 plume.-9-107 of 126 Intentionally left blank 108 of 126 APPENDIX A LOCATION DESIGNATION 109 of 126 Intentionally left blank 110 of 126 TABLE A-I: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program -Sampling Locations, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Site Site Type MW-QC-1 MW-QC-2 MW-QC-101I MW-QC-1011S MW-QC-102D MW-QC-1021 MW-QC-102S

MW-QC-1031 MW-QC-104S MW-QC-1051

MW-QC-1061 MW-QC-106S MW-QC-1071

MW-QC-108D

MW-QC-1081 MW-QC-1 08S MW-QC-1091 MW-QC-109S MW-QC-1 101 MW-QC-1 11 D1 MW-QC-1 11D2 MW-QC-1 Il1 MW-QC-1 121 MW-QC-1 131 MW-QC-1 141 MW-QC- 115S MW-QC-1 16S SURFACE WATER #1 SURFACE WATER #2 WELL #1 WELL #5WELL #6 LITTLE FISH WELL #7 BIG FISH WELL WELL #8 FIRE TRAINING WELL WELL #10 FISH HOUSE WELL WELL #11 SPRAY CANAL WELL STP SAND POINT WELL QC-GP-1 QC-GP-2 QC-GP-3 QC-GP-4 QC-GP-5 QC-GP-6 QC-GP-7 QC-GP-8 QC-GP-9 QC-GP-10 QC-GP-11 QC-GP-12 QC-GP-13 QC-GP-14 QC-GP-15 QC-GP-16 QC-GP-17Monitoring WellMonitoring Well

Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring WellMonitoring WellMonitoring WellMonitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring WellMonitoring WellMonitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Surface Water Surface Water Production Well Production Well Production Well Production Well Production Well Production Well Production Well Production Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well Sentinel Well A-1 111 of 126 C- ~A a IiRAF1 wwni"MHD FP-W PusUn GISCOMUkE LOM 90c"MOAN aFIGURE A-1 Sampling Locations Near the Site Boundary of the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 C4 illAND IDENW1FIR 0 kA~1iMI OFODUKOWA1 FLON NRECTVIN UJC4DRJft"iL RjV1R TA"~*"VIU4 figure 1 MQii-imRl ORING WELL LOCATIONS EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC.QUAD CITIES GENERATING STATION Co~rdova, Illinoist'FIGURE A-2 Sentinel Monitoring Point Locations, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2010 Intentionally left blank 114 of 126 APPENDIX B DATA TABLES 115 of 126 Intentionally left blank 116 of 126 TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 SR-90 MW-QC-1 03/09/10 < 165 MW-QC-1 06/02/10 < 170 MW-QC-1 08/31/10 < 183 < 0.3 MW-QC-1 12/07/10 < 168 MW-QC-1011 03/09/10 < 166 MW-QC-1011 06/02/10 < 171 MW-QC-1011 08/31/10 < 173 < 0.4 MW-QC-101S 03/09/10 < 166 MW-QC-101S 06/02/10 < 152 MW-QC-101S 08/31/10 < 175 < 0.5 MW-QC-102D 03/09/10 5770 +/- 624 MW-QC-102D 06/02/10 5510 +/- 596 MW-QC-102D 08/31/10 5240 +/- 581 < 0.5 MW-QC-102D 12/07/10 3380 +/- 387 MW-QC-1021 03/09/10 399 +/- 120 MW-QC-1021 06/02/10 1160 +/- 172 MW-QC-1021 08/31/10 643 +/- 149 < 0.4 MW-QC-1021 12/07/10 448 +/- 118 MW-QC-102S 03/09/10 < 166 MW-QC-102S 06/02/10 < 174 MW-QC-102S 08/31/10 < 196 < 0.6 MW-QC-102S 12/07/10 < 155 MW-QC-1031 03/09/10 < 167 MW-QC-1031 06/02/10 < 169 MW-QC-1031 08/31/10 < 183 < 0.6 MW-QC-1031 12/07/10 < 157 MW-QC-104S 03/09/10 306 + 117 MW-QC-104S 06/02/10 < 170 MW-QC-104S 08/31/10 < 166 < 0.6 MW-QC-104S 12/07/10 2220 + 272 MW-QC-1051 03/09/10 3400 + 388 MW-QC-1051 06/02/10 1250 + 183 MW-QC-1051 08/31/10 257 + 138 < 0.6 MW-QC-1051 12/07/10 49900 +/- 5030 MW-QC-1051 12/07/10 50600 +/- 5100 MW-QC-1061 03/09/10 < 167 MW-QC-1061 06/02/10 < 168 MW-QC-1061 08/31/10 < 179 < 0.4 MW-QC-1061 12/07/10 < 158 MW-QC-106S 03/09/10 < 163 MW-QC-106S 06/02/10 < 164 MW-QC-106S 08/31/10 < 191 < 0.7 MW-QC-106S 12/07/10 < 174 MW-QC-1071 03/09/10 < 167 MW-QC-1071 06/01/10 < 166 B-1 117 of 126 TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA SITE MW-QC-1071 MW-QC-108D MW-QC-108D MW-QC-108D MW-QC-108D MW-QC-1081 MW-QC-1081 MW-QC-1081 MW-QC-1081

MW-QC-1081

MW-QC-108S

MW-QC-108S MW-QC-108S MW-QC-1091 MW-QC-1091 MW-QC-1091 MW-QC-1091 MW-QC-109S MW-QC-109S MW-QC-109S MW-QC-109S MW-QC-1101 MW-QC-1101 MW-QC-1101 MW-QC-111D1 MW-QC-111 D1 MW-QC-111 D1 MW-QC-1 11 D2 MW-QC-1 11 D2 MW-QC-1 11 D2 MW-QC- 1111 MW-QC- 1111 MW-QC- 1111 MW-QC-1 121 MW-QC-1 121 MW-QC-1 121 MW-QC-1 121 MW-QC-1 131MW-QC-1 131MW-QC-1 131MW-QC-1 141MW-QC-1 141 MW-QC-1 141 MW-QC-1 15S COLLECTION DATE 08/31/10 03/10/10 06/03/10 09/01/10 12/08/10 03/10/10 06/03/10 09/01/10 12/08/10 12/08/10 03/10/10 06/03/10 09/01/10 12/08/10 03/09/10 06/02/10 08/31/10 12/07/10 03/09/10 06/02/10 08/31/10 12/07/10 03/10/10 06/03/10 09/01/10 03/10/10 06/03/10 09/01/10 03/10/10 06/03/10 09/01/10 03/10/10 06/03/10 09/01/10 03/09/10 06/01/10 08/30/10 12/06/10 03/10/10 06/03/10 09/01/10 03/10/10 06/03/10 09/01/10 03/09/10 H-" 3 SR-90< 0.3____j* 189 6080 +/-5220 +/-4490 +/-1860 +/-1420 +/-1870 +/-1640 +/-178 +/-242 +/-* 165* 167* 188* 158* 167* 170* 192* 169* 167* 170* 190* 167* 165* 168* 168* 166* 168* 197* 169* 170* 188* 164* 164* 190* 163* 169* 191* 168* 160* 173* 192* 168* 172* 174* 166 656 566 504 243 198 239 229 111 108* 0.8* 0.5< 0.4* 0.5< 0.4* 0.7* 0.5< 0.9< 0.7< 0.4< 0.65< 0.5 B-2 118 of 126 TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA SITE MW-QC-1 15S MW-QC-1 15S MW-QC-1 16S MW-QC-1 16S MW-QC-1 16S MW-QC-2 MW-QC-2 MW-QC-2 MW-QC-2 COLLECTION DATE 06/01/10 08/31/10 03/09/10 06/01/10 08/31/10 03/09/10 06/02/10 08/31/10 12/07/10 H-3 SR-90< 169< 173< 161< 169< 167< 169< 166< 173< 167< 0.4< 0.4< 0.72 B-3 119 of 126 TABLE B-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA SITE MW-QC-1 MW-QC-1011 MW-QC-1O1S MW-QC-102D MW-QC-1021 MW-QC-102S MW-QC-1031 MW-QC-104S MW-QC-1 051 MW-QC-1061 MW-QC-106S MW-QC-1071 MW-QC-108D

MW-QC-1081 MW-QC-108S MW-QC-1091 MW-QC-109S MW-QC-1101 MW-QC-111D1 MW-QC-1 11 D2 MW-QC- 1111MW-QC-1 121MW-QC-1 131MW-QC-1 141 MW-QC-1 15S MW-QC-1 16S MW-QC-2 COLLECTION PERIOD 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 09/01/10 09/01/10 09/01/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 09/01/10 09/01/10 09/01/10 09/01/10 08130/10 09/01/10 09/01/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 08/31/10 Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140< 16< 20< 13< 16< 16< 19< 15< 19< 17< 11< 16< 16< 16< 16< 16< 17< 13< 16< 12< 18< 13< 16< 16< 16< 14< 18< 15 59 +26 < 1<35 <2<18 <1<29 <2<15 <1<15 <2<10 <1<15 <2<14 <2<16 <1<33 <1<29 < 1<26 <1<14 <1<32 <2 34 +/- 22 < 1 104 +/- 20 < 1<14 <1<17 <1<32 <2<26 < 137 25 < 2<30 <1<14 <1<10 <1<15 <2 126 + 23 < 1<2<2<1<2<2

<2<1<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2

<2<1<2<1<2<1<2<2

<2<1<2<2<4<5<3<4

<4

<4<3<4

<4<3<4<4<4<4<4<4<3<4<3<4

<3

<4

<4<4<3<4<4<2<2<1<2<2<2<1<2<2<1<1<1<1<1<2<1<1<1<1<2

<1<1<2<1<1

<1<1<3<4<2<3<3<4<3<4

<3<2<3<3<3<3<3

<3<2<3<2<3<2<3<3

<3<3<3

<3<2<2<1<2<2<2<2<2<2

<1<2<2<2

<2<2<2<2<2<1<2<1<2<2<2<2<2

<2<3<4

<2<3<3<4<3<4<3<2<3<3

<3<3<3<3<3<3<2<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3< 14< 15<9< 13< 12< 13< 11< 14< 13<9< 12< 12< 11< 11< 11< 13< 11< 12<9< 14< 10< 15< 12< 13< 12< 15< 12<1

<2<1<1<1<2<1<2<1<1

<1<1<1<1<1<1<1<1<1<1<1

<1<1<1<1<1<1<1<2<1<2<2

<2<1<2<2<1

<1

<2<1

<1<2<2<1<1<1<2<1<2<2<1<1<2<1< 20< 23< 15< 19< 19< 22< 17< 21< 20< 13< 19< 18< 17< 17< 19< 20< 16< 19< 14< 21< 15< 20< 19< 19< 17< 22< 18<7<6

<4<6<6<7<5<7<6<4<6<6<6<5<5<6<4<6<4<7<5<6<6<6<5<7

<5 tC 0 TABLE B-II.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+/- 2 SIGMA SITESurface Water

1 Surface Water #1 Surface Water #2 Surface Water #2 COLLECTION DATE 06/01/10 08/31/10 06/01/10 08/31/10 H-3 SR-90< 171 431 +/- 127 227 +/- 117 342 +/- 122< 0.5< 0.3 B-5 121 of 126 TABLE B-II.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER

+ 2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION PERIOD Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140Surface Water

1Surface Water

2 08/31/10 08/31/10< 16 < 13 < 1 < 2<15 <33 <1 <2<4 <1 <3 <2<3 <1 <3 <2<3<3<14 <1<13 <1<1<1<20 <7<18 <6 0"'a TABLE B-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION PERSONNEL, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION SITE DATE ACTIVITY AQUIFER QC-GP-1 01/14/10 2,540 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 02/15/10 5,590 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 03/09/10 4,920 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 04/05/10 51,500 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 05/03/10 6,710 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 06/04/10 28,900 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 07/14/10 50,100 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 08/16/10 47,700 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 10/25/10 53,700 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-2 01/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-2 02/15/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-2 03/09/10 2,130 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-2 04/05/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-2 05/03/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-2 06/04/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-2 07/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-2 08/16/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-2 10/25/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-3 01/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-3 02/15/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-3 03/09/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-3 04/05/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-3 05/03/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-3 06/04/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-3 07/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-3 08/16/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-3 10/25/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 01/04/10 71,700 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 01/14/10 77,700 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 02/15/10 111,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 03/09/10 130,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 04/05/10 112,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 05/03/10 77,600 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 06/04/10 63,600 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 07/14/10 78,600 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 08/16/10 55,700 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-4 10/25/10 40,100 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-5 01/14/10 2,510 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-5 02/15/10 3,210 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-5 03/09/10 3,090 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-5 04/05/10 3,140 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-5 05/03/10 2,510 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-5 06/04/10 2,490 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-5 07/14/10 2,040 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-5 08/16/10 2,180 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-5 10/25/10 2,610 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-6 01/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-6 02/15/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-6 03/09/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-6 04/05/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-6 05/03/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-6 06/04/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-6 07/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-6 08/16/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer B-7 123 of 126 TABLE B-1Il.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION PERSONNEL, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION SITE DATE ACTIVITY AQUIFER QC-GP-6 10/25/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-7 01/14/10 4,410 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-7 02/15/10 5,910 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-7 03/09/10 5,050 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-7 04/05/10 7,260 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-7 05/03/10 9,140 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-7 06/04/10 10,200 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-7 07/14/10 6,820 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-7 08/16/10 4,020 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-7 10/25/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-8 01/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-8 02/15/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-8 03/09/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-8 04/05/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-8 05/03/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-8 06/04/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-8 07/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-8 08/16/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-8 10/25/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-9 01/14/10 15,600 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-9 02/15/10 14,700 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-9 03/09/10 72,800 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-9 04/05/10 36,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-9 05/03/10 27,500 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-9 06/04/10 35,600 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-9 07/14/10 15,900 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-9 08/16/10 9,760 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-9 10/25/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-10 01/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-10 02/15/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-10 03/09/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-10 04/05/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-10 05/03/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-10 06/04/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-10 07/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-10 08/16/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-10 10/25/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 1 01/04/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-11 01/14/10 2,830 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 1 02/15/10 2,030 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 1 03/09/10 3,730 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 1 04/05/10 12,800 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-11 05/03/10 12,800 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 1 06/04/10 3,480 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-11 07/14/10 3,870 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 1 08/16/10 4,240 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-1 1 10/25/10 2,970 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-12 02/15/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-12 03/09/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-12 04/05/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-12 05/03/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-12 06/04/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-12 07/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-12 08/16/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer B-8 124 of 126 TABLE B-Il.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION PERSONNEL, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION SITE DATE ACTIVITY AQUIFER QC-GP-12 10/25/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 01/04/10 205,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 01/14/10 259,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 02/15/10 534,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 03/09/10 308,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 04/05/10 442,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 05/03/10 236,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 06/04/10 232,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 07/14/10 198,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 08/16/10 181,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-13 10/25/10 115,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 01/04/10 348,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 01/14/10 346,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 02/15/10 382,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 03/09/10 285,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 04/05/10 68,100 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 05/03/10 57,600 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 06/04/10 227,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 07/14/10 236,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 08/16/10 193,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-14 10/25/10 128,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-15 01/14/10 3,070 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-15 02/15/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-15 03/09/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-15 04/05/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-15 05/03/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-15 06/04/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-15 07/14/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-15 08/16/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-15 10/25/10 <2,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-16 05/25/10 47,100 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-16 06/04/10 101,000 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-16 07/14/10 10,800 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-16 08/16/10 38,700 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-16 10/25/10 88,900 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-17 05/25/10 8,340 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-17 06/04/10 19,400 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-17 07/14/10 4,550 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-17 08/16/10 4,340 Shallow Aquifer QC-GP-17 10/25/10 14,500 Shallow Aquifer Well #1 03/08/10 <200 Well #1 06/28/10 <200 Well #1 09/15/10 <200 Well #5 03/08/10 <200 Well #5 06/28/10 <200Well #5 09/15/10 <200Well #6 03/08/10 <200Well #7 01/14/10 <200 Well #7 03/08/10 <200 Well #7 06/28/10 <200Well #7 09/15/10 <200Well #7 12/07/10 <200 Well #8 03/08/10 <200 Well #10 06/28/10 <200 B-9 125 of 126 TABLE B-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION PERSONNEL, 2010 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION DATE SITE ACTIVITY AQUIFER Well #10 Well #11 STP Sand Point 09/15/10 03/08/10 03/08/10<200<200<200 B-10 126 of 126

SVP-11-042, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Contents

Text

Subject:

Enclosure:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

4.5 MILES

3.1 miles

8.8 miles

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

SVP-11-042, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Text

Subject:

Enclosure:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

4.5 MILES

3.1 miles

8.8 miles

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search