PLA-6245, Susquehanna, Units 1 and 2 - Extended Power Uprate Application Materials and Chemical Engineering Technical Review Request for Additional Information Responses, PLA-6245

Susquehanna, Units 1 and 2 - Extended Power Uprate Application Materials and Chemical Engineering Technical Review Request for Additional Information Responses, PLA-6245

ML072010019
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	07/12/2007
From:	McKinney B T Susquehanna
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
PLA-6245
Download: ML072010019 (7)

Text

Brltt T. McKinney Sr. Vice President

& Chief Nuclear Officer PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick, PA 18603 Tel. 570.542.3149 Fax 570.542.1504 btmckinney@pplweb.com SP tI JUL 1 2 2007 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Stop OP1-17 Washington, DC 20555 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 285 FOR UNIT 1 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-14 AND PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 253 FOR UNIT 2 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-22 EXTENDED POWER UPRATE APPLICATION RE: MATERIALS AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL REVIEW REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESPONSES PLA-6245 Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388 References.

1)PPL Letter PLA-6076, B. T McKinney (PPL) to USNRC,"Proposed License Amendment Numbers 285for Unit 1 Operating License No. NPF-14 and 253for Unit 2 Operating License No. NPF-22 Constant Pressure Power Uprate, "ddated October 11, 2006.2) PPL Letter PLA-6212, B. T McKinney (PPL) to USNRC,"Proposed License Amendment No. 285for Unit 1 Operating License No. NPF-14 and Proposed License Amendment No. 253 for Unit 2 Operating License No. NPF-22 Extended Power Uprate Application Re: Materials and Chemical Engineering Technical Review Request for Additional Information Responses, "dated June 1, 2007.Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, PPL Susquehanna LLC (PPL) requested in Reference 1 approval of amendments to the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) Unit 1 and Unit 2 Operating Licenses (OLs) and Technical Specifications (TSs) to increase the maximum power level authorized from 3489 Megawatts Thermal (MWt) to 3952 MWt, an approximate 13% increase in thermal power. The proposed Constant Pressure Power Uprate (CPPU) represents an increase of approximately 20% above the Original Licensed Thermal Power (OLTP).The purpose of this letter is to supplement the response to NRC Question 4 contained in the Request for Additional Information Response transmitted to NRC in Reference 2.The Enclosure contains the PPL supplemental response.0Avo 2 -Document Control Desk PLA-6245 There are no new regulatory commitments associated with this submittal.

PPL has reviewed the "No Significant Hazards Consideration" and the "Environmental Consideration" submitted with Reference 1 relative to the Enclosure.

We have determined that there are no changes required to either of these documents.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Michael H. Crowthers at (610) 774-7766.I declare under perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Executed on: 7 -O B. T. McKinney

Enclosure:

Supplement to Request for Additional Information Response Copy: NRC Region I Mr. A. J. Blamey, NRC Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. R. V. Guzman, NRC Sr. Project Manager Mr. R. R. Janati, DEP/BRP Enclosure to PLA-6245 Supplement to Request for. Additional Information Response Enclosure to PLA-6245 Page 1 of 4 Supplemental Ouestions and Responses to PPL Response NRC Ouestion 4 of PLA-6212: NRC Question: Please describe how the thickness values predicted by your CHECWORKS model compare to the measured thickness values. For example, for the components listed in the response to NRC Question 4 on flow-accelerated corrosion (PLA-6212, dated June 1, 2007), or for another sample of components at Susquehanna 1 & 2 representing a range of FAC rates, please compare the most recent wall thickness measurements to the CHECWORKS model predictions.

PPL Response: The CHECWORKS (CW) models for Susquehanna Units 1 & 2 (SSES) were developed only recently (03/2005) and are not yet considered to be 'calibrated' as defined in EPRI NSAC-202L.

Since the models are not 'calibrated,'

associated predictive analysis results may not provide the desired correlation with actual (measured) plant data.Prior to CW, FAC-susceptible plant systems were modeled using PPL in-house software that utilized FAC predictive methodologies available in the public domain. The FAC analyses were used to determine the relative susceptibility of components in each system;components with the highest predicted wear rate / lowest remaining life were incorporated into the FAC Program inspection scope. These components were monitored for wear and inspection frequencies were determined based on a conservative analysis of SSES FAC wear data. While a large number of component inspections were performed, the component type / parallel train coverage required for model calibration by the current NSAC-202L guidance was not satisfied.

In addition, component gridding requirements and conventions have evolved over time, so only a limited amount of component UT grid data could be loaded into CW (UT grids must be compatible for CW analysis), which also affected the calibration status of the CW models.The CW predictive analysis results are used primarily for the selection of components for inspection in the effort to achieve model 'calibration' using NSAC-202L guidance.

The CW analysis results are used in conjunction with the trended historical data from past component inspections to select components for inspection that will serve to monitor the condition of the predicted highest wear / lowest remaining service life components in a given system as well as to achieve 'calibration' of the CW model. A 'calibrated' predictive model closely predicts actual FAC wear and allows a reduction in the number of components that must be monitored in a given system.

Enclosure to PLA-6245 Page 2 of 4 A summary of predicted thickness values and corresponding measured thickness values are provided in the below Table. The data provided for components listed in the response to NRC Question 4 on flow-accelerated corrosion (PLA-6212, dated June 1, 2007) is current inspection data if it was available (U1RIO14-2006

/ U2RIO13-2007, unless noted otherwise).

If data for the specific component was not available, a component was selected that was located in a line that was subject to similar operating conditions.

Enclosure to PLA-6245 Page 3 of 4 CHECWORKS PREDICTED THICKNESS VALUES VS. MEASURED THICKNESS VALUES Measured Predicted Measured /Description Component Name Geometry Same / Similar Component Geometry Thickness Thickness Predicted (PLA-6212) (PLA-6212)

[Inspection Outage / Comment] (in) (in) Thickness EXTRACTION to GFD-101-2-5020-T TEE GFD-l01-2-5020-T TEE 0.426 0.106 4.019 FWH #5 [U1RIO14]FEEDWATER GBD-118-1-1000-N EXIT GBD- 118-2-151 0-E 90 DEG 0.707 0.532 1.329 FWH2 to FWH3 NOZZLE [U1RIO14]

ELBOW FEEDWATER GBD-121-2-5655-N INLET GBD-121-2-5620-T TEE 0.884 0.500 1.768 FWH5 to RFP B NOZZLE [U1RIO14]FEEDWATER RFP DBD-101-6-1105-ORIFICE ORIFICE 1.891 0.686 2.757 to REACTOR [U1RIO14]FWH DRAIN FWH5 90 DEG GBD-136-2-5040-E 90 DEG to DRI GBD-103-1-1010-E ELBOW [U1RIO14; FWH DRAIN ELBOW 0.507 0.403 1.258 to LCV ELBOW [RI1,FHDANELBOW FWH4 to LCV]REACTOR to DBA-121-1-9600-N EXIT DBA-101-1-2505-E 90 DEG 0.429 0.041 10.463 RWCU PUMPS NOZZLE [U1RIO14]

ELBOW RWCU RGEN HX DBC-103-1-7000-N EXIT DBC-103-1-7095-E 90 DEG 0.558 0.324 1.722 TUBSIDE NOZZLE [U1RIO14]

ELBOW RWCU RGEN HX to DBB-122-1-8605-O ORIFICE DBB-122-1-8570-P PIPE D/S 0.400 0.411 0.973 FEEDWATER

[U1RIO14]

VALVE FEEDWATER RFP DBD-201-4-1130-P PIPE D/S 1.191 1.160 to REACTOR [U2RIO 13] ORIFICE 1.38 1 RWCU RGEN HX to DBB-222-2-8620-O ORIFICE DBB-222-2-8625-P PIPE D/S 0.430 0.392 1.097 FEEDWATER

[U2RIO 12] ORIFICE Enclosure to PLA-6245 Page 4 of 4 It is apparent from the data provided that the CW predicted thickness values are generally conservative.

In one case, the predicted thickness value is marginally less than the measured value (2.7%). This can be attributed to the fact that there is less historical data available for the RWCU system since it did not become significantly susceptible to FAC until hydrogen water chemistry was implemented.

NRC Question Please identify the non-destructive test methods used in your FAC program for measuring component thickness.

PPL Response: The SSES FAC Program utilizes ultrasonic testing (UT) as the primary NDE method for determining component wall thickness.

While program procedures allow the use of other NDE technologies such as radiography (RT), UT has been the only method utilized by the Program to date.