ML17266A060

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:31, 18 October 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Environ Radiological Monitoring Rept,1978.
ML17266A060
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/27/1979
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17266A059 List:
References
EMR-781231-1, NUDOCS 7904170291
Download: ML17266A060 (10)


Text

FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY St Lucie Plant Unit No.1 License No.-DPR-67 Docket No.50-335 MMUAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT for The Period: 1-01-78 to 12-31-78 Prepared 3-27-79

~i'.Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with St.Lucie Plant Technical Specifications Section 5.6.1.b.All environmental samples were collected and ana3.yzed during this reporting period in accordance with requirements of St.Lucie Plant's'echnical Specifications.

The minimum of frequency of collection and analyses for specific radionuclide species as required by these specifications have been met or exceeded.No'armful effects or evidence of irreversible damage to the environment or to the health and safety of individuals or population groups in the regions surrounding St.Lucie Plant have been'detected by this monitoring program.In addition to'the Environment Radiological Monitoring data, this report includes information about the semi-annual census for 500 ft~gardens and milk-producing animals.2.The Moaitorin Pro ram Anal t2.cal Res onsibilit Environmental radiological monitoring at St.Lucie Plant is.carried out by the Orlando Radio1ogical Laboratory of the.Department of Health and Rehabili-.tative Services of Florida (DHRS)personnel.

Numb'er of Sam@les.Anal zed A.total of.1,174 analyses on samples collected from 25'ifferent locations were performed during the period of this report.TABLE 1 summarizes the mean and, range values of these analyses.S lit Sam le Anal ses At least 20 of the samples collected have been analyzed in the DHRS/ERDA Split-Samp'ing Program.3.Evaluation of Data Except as noted in TABLE 1, none of the sampling locations used.m the environmenta3 radiological monitoring program showed evidence of having significant concentrations of a particular radionuclide.

in a specific sample material'uch higher than the observed mean for that radionuclide at all sampling locations.

Trend plotting of our particulate and direct radiation data reveals no plant-related variations.

A'iso, all data have been evaluated with respect to pre-operational data and have been found to be within the+2a 3.imits observed for these pre-operational data.Comparative data obtained in the assay of control samples also appears in TABLE l.

4-Non-Routine Re orted Measurements Following the March Chinese weapons test, a weekly composite of air particulate filters.and a milk sample were collected and analyzed..I was detected and appeared to be from the Chinese weapons tests.-5.Dair Herd, Goat,, and.Garden Census A dairy herd census was conducted.

in February and in August during this report-period.The nearest aairy is west of the plant site (260');14 miles)Data obtained in the assays of samples collected at.this location are reported in TABLE l.One milk goat has been found, at a location SN of the plant site (220';2.2 miles).It produces negligible amounts of milk.An aerial garden census in March,'1978 showed that there'ere several 500 ft~gardens within approximately 5 miles.of St.Lucia Plant.Collard Greens were sampled at 7609 Indian River Drive;NSH,.2 miles, Results.of these analyses.appear in ABLE l.6.Conclusions During-this period, the environmental radiological monitoring program chas found no evidence that the operations of PSL'Unit No.1 contribute harmful effects or irreversible damage to either the environment=

or to the health and safety of individuals and.population groups in the regions surrounding

~St.Lucie Plant.

TAOLE 1 ENVIRONHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL llOttITORING PROGRAH SUlttORY NAllE OF FACILITY St.Lucie Fiant Unit 1 DOCKET tlO.DPR-67.LOCATION OF FACILITY'Hutchinson Island, FL REPORTItlG PERIOD 1-01-78 to 12-31-78 Iledium or Pathway Samnled Unit Analysis for Sites ttumber of Samples Analyses tlean Range, All Indicator Locations Sample Location Distance and Direction tlean Range Location with lli hest Hean ttean Range Control Location~~tlumber of tlonroutine Reported Heasurements 1.0 AIR FllTERS 1.1 Air Particu-pCi/m lates Gtt 474 474-0,05 0.005-0.27 11-32: Entomolo8y Lab, Vero Beacht Ntnt, 19 miles 0.16 0.07-'.23 0.0SI')0.006-0.14 tiasuremcnts cited in their report 1.1 Air Zodines pCi/m!!I 474 ND"'one 1.1~Gamttta Scan (ttt on thly composites of filters)PCi/me 108 108 ND Nona deco,~e~dt ete ot Filter~Co dotted pci/m'Sr s 0Sr 9 9.36 36"'6.ND 36 None None 1.2 Direct R dtettoo uRem/le y 72 72 4-20 N-12!FPL Substation, Stuart, Florida;S, 12 miles 19 17-20 S (a)

Vedium.or Pathway Sampled Uni t Analysis for Sites Humber of Samples All Indicator Locations Range Analyses Hean Control Location Sample Location Distance and Direction lIean Range l<ean Range Location with Hi hest Hean Humber of Honr outine Reported Heasurements 2.0.WATER 1.1.1~Dtathaa a Canal Z.I.2 Ocean Mater pCi/1 4ll 4'sr"sr pCi/I'H 44sr'4sr 1 1 12 12 12 12 12 12 24 24 24 263<200<200-960 II-36: On site, Dis.Canal, Drest of hlh;ESE'0.19 miles None Hone None None None 263<200-960<200()2.1.3 Estaurine Mater pCi/1 4II 4<200 Hone 2.2 2.3 Cround Water Mell Pa ta ala Ilatat pCi/1 4II GB-'DS OB"UDS pCi/i'll i 1 12 12<200 HD ND 3 None ll-30;Residence, Indian River Drive None Hone<1 W-3 GB-Ds 12 ND-9 II-11;St.Lucio County Health, Dept., Ft;Piercp H, a llone.r:.Bj 3 ND-9 lledlum or Pathway Samoled Unit Ana)ys)s for Number of Sites Samples Ana'lyses Hean Range All Indicator Locations Control Location>>~Samp)e Location Distance and Dlrectlon lie an Range I<can Range Location with Hl hest Hean llumber of.Honroutlne Reported Heasurements

3.0 BOITOH

SEDIMENTS 3.1~Dtsahax a Canal 3.2 Ocean 3.3 Beach Sand Ci/k8 Ci/kG Ci/k8 bbst SOS'bCo bbs$Os'bSr$bshe 1 1'6 ND 70 ND'ND ND ND-}40'one None B-36>On Site>Dia, Canal, Meet of hlA;ESE, 0.19 tnilea None Hone None None 14O ND-14O ND(e)ND~'~ND'>

tledlum or.Pathway Samaled Unit Analysis for Humber of Sites Samples Analyses t~iean Range All Indicator Locations Location with Hi hest Mean Sample Location Oistance and Direction lledn Control Location>>~Range Mean Range Husker of Honroutine Reported Measurements 4.0 4.1 AIIUhYZC DIOTIA (c)Crustacea 4.2.1 Fish-~Carnivore 4.2:2 Fish-(8)Herbivore pCI/kp pCi/kg pci/kg~tsr 9 ts stS tts tts t lsr 2 3 3 4 4 3 3 HD HD ND ND'3 ND-13 Hone None None None None H-32: Entomology Lab;Vero Beach, NHW, 19 miles 13 ND(')HD(")ND(")ND(')

f tedium or Pathway Samnled Unit Analysis for Sites Number of All Indicator Locations Range Samples Analyses Hean Sample Location Distance and Direction iiean Range Location with Ili hest I!can'ean Range Control Location~~Number of Nonroutine Reported Heasurements

5.0 TERRESTRIAL

BIOTA 5.1 Hilk 5.2.1 road (g)Citrus pCi/1 pci/kg C 44S"Sr'I 4 IZ"Sr'ssr 2 2 2 7 7 3G 36~36 36 36>>(I)32(E)32 21.G ND~ND 22 ND"64 2"3 ND-.91(S 10-32 II-40: Contiol-Davis Dairy;Boynton Beach, SSP., 55.8 iiillee 40l 22 II II II None 30('D64 ND-.91 II-03: Headowbrook Dairy;<1 14i ciiIee, SSW Hone I!-22: Lentz Crovce, VS 1~SSW 5a5 iiilles 30')3 ND')ND-64 HD-.36 I secs 13 ND-90 H-24i Poster Croves, US I;WIN 5.35 aillde 90 2.2.2~aaad-Ledf (h)~Ve etaelea pci/kg'Cs 44S~sgr 330 43 ND II-41 i Drive H-41.'rive None 7609 Indian River 30" I WSW, 2 iiiiles 7609 Indian River I WSW, 2 iiiilee Vediu~or Pathway Sampled Unit Analysis for Number of Sites San:pl es Analyses ttean Range All indicator Locations Location Mlth Hi hest Pean Control location~~Sample Location Distance and Oirection llean Range liean Range'{umber of Nonroutine Reported Heasureawnts (a)If-32: Depart)(b)ND: Hone det" cnt oE ctable (c)Blue Crab (d)Mullet (e)Control samp e is H (E)Two samples d stroye (g)Grapefruit, C trus, (h)Turnip Greens Health and 40, Davis in Lab Ac Rchabil t'ative Se airy, B ynton Bca ident vice , Ento h, SSE,."55.ology,L miles boratory;East of V.S.1, Vera Beac , Nnf, 19 mil s (i)All analysis cra: of 0.07+0.02 Ci/m ($)h)1 analysis ut tw nAetectab were non-d e excep Eor week tectabl for Iodi of March 2 e 131.Th , 1978.H 03 mi Vcckly c posite for that wack gav k sample.ha week of 3-10-78 had a Iodin concen concc ration ration'0.91..46 pci/1~