ML100810310

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:20, 14 October 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Susquehanna, Units 1 and 2, ME2839 & ME2840, Correction Letter Correction Fr Notice for EA-FR for Publication in Fr and Corrected Fr Notice for Exemption Prior to Publication in Fr
ML100810310
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/29/2010
From: Bhalchandra Vaidya
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Rausch T S
Susquehanna
vaidya B K, NRR/Dorl/lpl1-1, 415-3308
References
TAC ME2839, TAC ME2840
Download: ML100810310 (9)


Text

UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 March 29, 2010 Mr. Timothy S. Rausch Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick, PA 18603-0467 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND CORRECTION LETTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT RE: EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR PART 73, SECTION 73.55 IMPLEMENTATIOI\J DEADLINE FOR PHYSICAL SECURITY PLANS (TAC NOS. ME2839 AND ME2840)

Dear Mr. Rausch:

By letters dated March 11,2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML100110253), and March 19,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML100110292). the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued the Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (EA) and the approval of the Exemption request to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-14 and I\IPF-22, for Units 1 and 2, respectively, for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES). The above documents were in response to your request for exemptions dated December 3, 2009, as supplemented by letters dated January 8 and 29, 2010, for the extension of the March 31, 2010, implementation date for certain security requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 73, "PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF PLANTS AND MATERIALS," issued by NRC in a Final Rule dated March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13926). The NRC letter of issuance for the EA dated March 11, 2010, stated that the proposed exemption would allow an extension from the March 31, 2010, implementation date for some specific requirements, until October 29, 2010, for two requirements and until July 31, 2011, for one other requirement. The EA was published in the Federal Register (FR) on March 19, 2010 (75 FR 13322). The exemption approval letter dated March 19, 2010, stated the same terms for the extension and implementation dates. Subsequent to the issuance of the exemption approval letter, the NRC staff noted that the licensee's supplemental letter dated January 29, 2010, revised the original exemption request.

The supplement revised the number of requirements that would be extended on the proposed dates. (i.e., the revision stated that one specific requirement would be extended until October 29, 2010, and two specific requirements would be extended until July 31, 2011). This revision was not reflected in the NRC letter of issuance for the EA dated March 11, 2010, the NRC letter of issuance for the exemption approval dated March 19, 2010, nor was it correctly stated in the EA as published in the Federal Register on March 19, 2010 (75 FR 13322). A copy of the Correction FR Notice for the Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact is enclosed. It has been forwarded to the Office of the Federal Register for publication. Coincidentally, the error was corrected in the Exemption before being published in T. S. Rausch -2 the Federal Register on March 29, 2010 (75 FR 15462). A copy of the published Exemption is enclosed. The NRC regrets any inconvenience that these inadvertent editorial errors may have caused. If there are any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 301-415-3308.

Sincerely, Bhalchandra K. Vaidya, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388

Enclosures:

as stated cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv Enclosure 7590-01-P UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKET NOS. 50-387 AND 50-388 PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC. SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 CORRECTION TO FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission ACTION: Notice of Issuance -Correction

SUMMARY

This document corrects a notice appearing in the Federal Register on March 19, 2010 (75 FR 13322), that incorrectly stated the number of exemptions requested by the licensee and the corresponding implementation date. This action is necessary to correct erroneous information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bhalchandra K. Vaidya, NRR/DORLlPM, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone (301) 415-3308, e-mail: Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

(1) On page 13322, in the first column, third complete paragraph, lines twelve, thirteen, and fourteen, it reads, "October 29, 2010, for two requirements and until July 31, 2011, for one other requirement.

The proposed action, an" and is corrected to read "October 29, 2010, for one requirement and until July 31, 2011, for two other requirements.

The proposed action, an" (2) On page 13322, in the second column, third complete paragraph, lines two, three, and four, it reads, "until October 29, 2010, for two requirements and until July 31, 2011, for one other requirement" and is corrected to read, "until October 29,2010, for one requirement and until July 31,2011, for two other requirements." (3) On page 13322, in the third column, second complete paragraph, last line, it reads, "13926,13967 (March 27, 2009)]" and is corrected to read, "13926 (March 27,2009)]".

(4) On page 13322, in the third column, third complete paragraph, lines nine, ten, and eleven, it reads, "October 29, 2010, for two requirements and until July 31, 2011, for one other requirement, would not have any" and is corrected to read, "October 29, 2010, for one requirement and until July 31, 2011, for two other requirements, would not have any".

-2Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of March 2010. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Bhalchandra K. Vaidya, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure 15462 Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 59/Monday, March Z9, Z009/Notices home page site for 60 days after the signature date of this notice. Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be made available for public inspection.

Because your comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information, the NRC cautions you against including any information in your submission that you do not want to be publicly disclosed.

Comments submitted should reference Docket No. NRC-2010-0113.

You may submit your comments by any of the following methods. Electronic comments; Go to http;// www.regulations.gov and search for Docket No. NRC-2010-0113.

Mail comments to NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell (T-5 F53), U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Questions about the information collection requirements may be directed to the NRC Clearance Officer, Tremaine Donnell (T-5 F53), U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, by telephone at 415-6258, or bye-mail to INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRG.GOV. Datedat Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day ofMarch 2010. Forthe Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Tremaine Donnell, NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information Services.

IFR Doc. 2010-6883 Filed 3-26-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7591H11-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388; 2010-0109l PPL Susquehanna, LLCj Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2; Exemption

1.0 Background

PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL or the licensee) is the holder of Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-14 and NPF-22, which authorize operation of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2. The licenses provide, among other things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect, The facility consists of two water reactors located in Luzerne County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

2.0 Request/Action Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 73, "PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF PLANTS AND MATERIALS," section 73.55, "Requirements for physical protection of licensed activities in nuclear power reactors against radiological sabotage," published March 27, 2009, effective May 26,2009, with a full implementation date of March 31,2010, requires licensees to protect, with high assurance, against radiological sabotage by designing and implementing comprehensive site security programs.

The amendments to 10 CFR 73.55 published on March 27, 2009, establish and update generically applicable security requirements similar to those previously imposed by Commission orders issued after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and implemented by licensees.

In addition, the amendments to 10 CFR 73.55 include additional requirements to further enhance site security based upon insights gained from implementation of the post-September 11, 2001, security orders. It is from three of these new requirements that PPL now seeks an exemption from the March 31, 2010, implementation date. All other physical security requirements established by this recent rulemaking have already been or will be implemented by the licensee by March 31, 2010.

By letter dated December 3,2009, as supplemented by letters dated January 8 and 29, 2010, the licensee requested an exemption in accordance with 10 CFR 73.5, "Specific exemptions." The portions of the licensee's letters dated December 3,2009, as supplemented by letters dated January 8 and 29, 2010, contain sensitive security information and accordingly are withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390.

The licensee has requested an exemption from the March 31, 2010, compliance date, stating that it must complete a number of significant modifications to the current site security configuration before all requirements can be met. Specifically, the request is to extend the compliance date for one specific requirement to October 29, 2010, and until July 31, 2011, for two other requirements from the current March 31, 2010, deadline.

Being granted this exemption for the three items would allow the licensee to complete the modifications designed to update aging equipment and incorporate of-the-art technology to meet or exceed the noted regulatory requirements.

3.0 Discussion

of Part 73 Schedule Exemptions From the March 31, 2010, Full Implementation Date Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), "By March 31, 2010, each nuclear power reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR part 50, shall implement the requirements of this section through its Commission-approved Physical Security Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber Security Plan referred to collectively hereafter as 'security plans.'" Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 73 when the exemptions are authorized by law, and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and are otherwise in the public interest.

This NRC approval of the exemption as noted above, would allow an extension of implementation date in the new rule from March 31,2010, to October 29, 2010, for one specific requirement and until [uly 31,2011, for two other requirements.

As stated above, 10 CFR 73.5 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 73. The NRC staff has determined that granting of the licensee's proposed exemption would not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended or the Commission's regulations.

Therefore, the NRC approval of the licensee's exemption request is authorized by law. In the draft final power reactor security rule provided to the Commission, the NRC staff proposed that the requirements of the new regulation be met within 180 days.

The Commission directed a change from 180 days to approximately 1 year for licensees to fully implement the new requirements.

This change was incorporated into the final rule. From this, it is clear that the Commission wanted to provide a reasonable time frame for licensees to achieve full compliance.

As noted in the final rule, the Commission also anticipated that licensees would have to conduct specific analyses to determine what changes were necessary to implement the rule's requirements, and that changes could be accomplished through a variety of licensing mechanisms, including exemptions.

Since issuance of the final rule, the Commission has rejected a generic industry request to extend the rule's compliance date for all operating nuclear power plants, but noted that the Commission's regulations provide mechanisms for individual 15463 Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 59/Monday, March 29, 2009/Notices licensees, with good cause, to apply for relief from the compliance date (

Reference:

letter dated June 4, 2009, from RW. Borchardt, NRC, to M.S.

Fertel, Nuclear Energy Institute, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Number ML091410309).

The licensee's request for an exemption is, therefore, consistent with the approach set forth by the Commission and discussed in the letter dated June 4, 2009, SSES Units 1 and 2 Schedule Exemption Request The licensee provided detailed information in its submissions dated December 3,2009, as supplemented by letters dated January 8 and 29, 2010, requesting an exemption. In its submissions, PPL stated that implementation of specific parts of the new requirements will require more time to implement since they involve significant physical modifications requiring:

(1) Specific parts that are proving to be long lead time items, (2) specialized industry expertise whose availability is being challenged by the significant demand for a limited resource, or (3) a major interface with the plant for installation that must be carefully planned and implemented to avoid impact to the plant protective strategy.

The licensee provided a timeline for achieving full compliance with the new regulation.

The licensee's submissions dated December 3, 2009, as supplemented by letters dated January 8 and 29, 2010, contain sensitive security information regarding (1) The site security plan, (2) details of the specific requirements of the regulation for which the site cannot be in compliance by the March 31,2010, deadline and justification for the same, (3) the required changes to the site's security configuration, and (4) a timeline with critical path activities that will bring the licensee into full compliance by July 31, 2011, for all the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued on March 27, 2009 (by October 29, 2010, for one specific requirement, by July 31, 2011, for two other requirements, and by March 31,2010, for all other requirements).

The timeline provides dates indicating when (1) construction will begin on various phases of the project (e.g., new roads, buildings, and fences), (2) outages are scheduled for each unit, and (3) critical equipment will be ordered, installed, tested and become operational.

Notwithstanding the schedule exemptions for these limited requirements, the licensee stated that it will continue to be in compliance with all other applicable physical security requirements as described in 10 CFR 73.55 and reflected in its current approved physical security program. By July 31,2011, SSES, Units 1 and 2 will be in full compliance with all the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued on March 27, 2009.

4.0 Conclusion

for Part 73 Schedule Exemption Request The staff has reviewed the licensee's submittals and concludes that the licensee has provided adequate justification for its request for an extension of the compliance date to July 31,2011, with regard to three specified requirements of 10 CFR 73.55.

Accordingly, the Commission has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, "Specific exemptions," an exemption from the March 31,2010, compliance date is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest.

Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the requested exemption.

The NRC staff has determined that the long-term benefits that will be realized when the modifications described in PPL's letter dated December 3,2009, as supplemented by letters dated January 8 and 29, 2010, are complete, justifies exceeding the full compliance date in the case of this particular licensee.

The security measures PPL needs additional time to implement are new requirements imposed by March 27, 2009, amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and are in addition to those required by the security orders issued in response to the events of September 11,2001. Therefore, the NRC concludes that the licensee's actions are in the best interest of protecting the public health and safety through the security changes that will result from granting this exemption.

As per the licensee's request and the NRC's regulatory authority to grant an exemption from the March 31,2010, implementation deadline for the three items specified in its letter dated December 3, 2009, as supplemented by letter dated January 8 and January 29, 2010, the licensee is required to be in full compliance July 31,2011 (by October 29, 2010, for one specific requirement, by July 31, 2011, for two other requirements, and by March 31, 2010, for all other requirements.)

In achieving compliance, the licensee is reminded that it is responsible for determining the appropriate licensing mechanism (i.e., 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 CFR 50.90) for incorporation of all necessary changes to its security plans. Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, "Finding of no significant impact," the Commission has previously determined that the granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment 75 FR 13322; dated March 19, 2010.

This exemption is effective upon issuance. Datedat Rockville, Maryland this 22nd day of March 2010, For the NuclearRegulatoryCommission. Joseph G. Giitter, Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2010-6885 Filed 3-26-10; 8:45 ami BILLING CODE 759D-01-P OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT National Council on Federal Management Relations Meeting AGENCY: Office of ACTION: Notice of

SUMMARY

The National Council on Federal Labor-Management Relations will hold its second and third meetings on April 7, 2010 and May 5,2010 at the time and location shown below. The Council is an advisory body composed of representatives of Federal employee organizations, Federal management organizations, and senior government officials.

The Council was established by Executive Order 13522, entitled, "Creating Labor-Management Forums to Improve Delivery of Government Services," which was signed by the President on December 9, 2009. Along with its other responsibilities, the Council assists in the implementation of Labor Management Forums throughout the government and makes recommendations to the President on innovative ways to improve delivery of services and products to the public while cutting costs and advancing employee interests.

The Council is chaired by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management and the Deputy Director for Management of the Office of Management and Budget. Please note that we are providing a slightly shortened notice period for the April 7 meeting as permitted under 41 CFR 102-3.150 in "exceptional circumstances." Action on this notice was delayed due to the press of increased workloads at OPM this week relating to the recent passage of the health care bill. However, the meeting date, time, location and purpose were announced at the February 26, 2010 public meeting of the Council. Also, notice of the meeting has been posted

1. S. Rausch -2 the Federal Register on March 29, 2010 (75 FR 15462). A copy of the published Exemption is enclosed. The NRC regrets any inconvenience that these inadvertent editorial errors may have caused. If there are any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 301-415-3308.

Sincerely, IRA! Bhalchandra K. Vaidya, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388

Enclosures:

as stated cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC LPL1-1 RtF RidsNrrDorlLpl-1 RidsOGCMailCenter RidsNsirDspRsrlb RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsNrrPMSusquehanna (paper copy)

RidsNrrDlrRerb RidsNrrLASLittle (paper copy) PKrohn, RI RidsRgn'l MailCenter RidsOgcRp Resource LTrocine, OEDO Region 1 ADAMS Accession No'.. ML100810310 OFFICE LPL1-1/PM LPL1-1/LA LPL1-1/BC LPL1-1/PM NAME BVaidya SLittie NSalgado BVaidya DATE 3/29/10 3/29/10 3/29/10 3/29/10 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy