IR 05000443/2016502

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:44, 16 September 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IR 05000443/2016502 - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 - Evaluated Emergency Preparedness Exercise Inspection Report
ML16137A139
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/16/2016
From: Raymond McKinley
Plant Support Branch 1
To: Curtland D A
NextEra Energy Seabrook
mckinley, RR
References
IR 2016502
Download: ML16137A139 (10)


Text

J. Dent May 16, 2016 D. Curtland -2- 50-443 NPF-86

ML16137A139 SUNSI Review Non-Sensitive Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRS RI/DRP RI/DRS NAME SBarr/ SB FBower/ FLB RMcKinley/ RRM DATE 05/10/16 05/10/16 05/16/16 1 Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I Docket N License N NPF-86 Report N /2016502 Licensee: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Facility: Seabrook Station, Unit N Location: Seabrook, New Hampshire Dates: April 4-7, 2016 Inspectors: S. Barr, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), Region I (Lead) J. DeBoer, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I P. Ott, Operations Inspector, DRS, Region I J. Bream, Security Inspector, DRS, Region I R. Vadella, Reactor Engineer, Division of Reactor Projects, Region I Approved By: Raymond McKinley, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety 2

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000443/2016502; 04/04/16 04/07/16; Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1; Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review--Performance Indicator Verification. This was an announced inspection conducted by five Region I-based inspectors. No findings ation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-Revision 5.

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

No findings were identified.

3

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone:

Emergency Preparedness (EP) 1EP1 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

On April 5, 2016, NextEra conducted a biennial Seabrook emergency preparedness exercise, the performance of the Seabrook emergency response organization (ERO) to respond to the simulated emergency, and NextEperformance via a formal critique process, as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.

The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment: A review of other performance areas, such as: the licensee ERO recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control; intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.

b. Findings

No findings were identified. 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review (71114.08 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the April 5, 2016, EP exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which NextEra had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Seabrook Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151

3 Samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed data for the Seabrook EP Performance Indicators (PI), which are:

(1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP);
(2) ERO Drill Participation; and,
(3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability. The last EP inspection at Seabrook was conducted in the fourth calendar quarter of 2015, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the fourth calendar quarter of 2015 through the first calendar quarter of 2016, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-7. This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, including Exit

The inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. Dean Curtland, Site Vice President, at the conclusion of the inspection on April 7, 2016. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.

ATTACHMENT

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

D. Curtland, Site Vice President
D. Currier, Emergency Preparedness Manager

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened/Closed

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Section 1EP1: Exercise Evaluation Seabrook Station Radiological Emergency Plan, Revision 69

EP-AA-101, Nuclear Division Drill and Exercise Program, Revision 1
EP-AA-101-1000, Nuclear Division Drill and Exercise Procedure, Revision 9
EP-AA-101-1000-10001, Nuclear Division Drill and Exercise Objectives and
Demonstration Criteria, Revision 1 Seabrook Emergency Implementing Procedures Seabrook Station Emergency Exercise
CFD 16-02 Scenario Package Seabrook Emergency Preparedness Drill Reports, November 2014
March 2016 SEP#
201604, Seabrook Station
CFD 16-02 Exercise Report ER 1.1A, Emergency Initiating Condition Matrix, Revision 46 ER 3.1, Technical Support Center Operations, Revision 60 ER 5.3A, Operation of the Raddose V, Revision 34 ER 5.4, Protective Action Recommendations, Revision 35

Section 1EP8: Exercise Evaluation

Scenario Review Seabrook Station Radiological Emergency Plan, Revision 69 Seabrook Station Emergency Exercise
CFE 1405 Scenario Package
EP-AA-101, Nuclear Division Drill and Exercise Program, Revision 1
EP-AA-101-1000-10000, NRC and FEMA Evaluated Exercise Scenario Review and
Submittal, Revision 00

Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

EPDP-03, Emergency Preparedness Performance Indicators, Revision 25 DEP PI data, October 2015
March 2016 ERO Drill Participation PI data, October 2015
March 2016 ANS Reliability PI data, October 2015
March 2016

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
AF Alternative Facility
ANS Alert Notification System
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DEP Drill and Exercise Performance
EOF Emergency Operations Facility
EP Emergency Preparedness
ERF Emergency Response Facility
ERO Emergency Response Organization
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
NEI Nuclear Energy Institute
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
PI Performance Indicator
TSC Technical Support Center