Semantic search

This page or action requires JavaScript to work. Please enable JavaScript in your browser or use a browser where it is supported, so that functionality can be provided as requested. For further assistance, please have a look at the noscript help page.

Options | Search Clear all entries |

Condition

Printout selection

Options

Parameters [+]

limit:

The maximum number of results to return

offset:

The offset of the first result

link:

Show values as links

headers:

Display the headers/property names

mainlabel:

The label to give to the main page name

intro:

The text to display before the query results, if there are any

outro:

The text to display after the query results, if there are any

searchlabel:

Text for continuing the search

default:

The text to display if there are no query results

class:

An additional CSS class to set for the table

transpose:

Display table headers vertically and results horizontally

sep:

The separator between results

prefix:

Control display of namespace in printouts

Sort options

Delete

Add sorting condition

ResultCodeDebugExtra

To embed this query inline into a wiki page use the code below.

{{#ask: [[Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR]] [[Site::Three Mile Island||05000000||Shoreham]]
 |?Issue date
 |?Title
 |?Topic
 |format=table
 |limit=50
 |offset=0
 |sort=
 |order=asc
 |mainlabel=
 |searchlabel=[Table view]
}}

Results 1 – 50 previous 50 20 50 100 250 500 next 50

JSON CSV RSS RDF

Query log

{
    "query_string": "[[Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES &amp; PETITIONS FOR]] [[Site::Three Mile Island||05000000||Shoreham]]",
    "query_source": "SMWSQLStore",
    "query_time": "1.6550",
    "from_cache": false
}

	Issue date	Title	Topic
B12706, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev of Backfitting Process for Power Reactors	13 October 1987	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev of Backfitting Process for Power Reactors	Backfit
B12870, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Leakage Testing of Containments to Permit Use of Mass Point Method as Alternative Method for Calculating Containment Leakage Rates	31 March 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Leakage Testing of Containments to Permit Use of Mass Point Method as Alternative Method for Calculating Containment Leakage Rates
B12891, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcement of Inspector on Site	18 April 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcement of Inspector on Site
B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel	8 March 1989	Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel	Probabilistic Risk Assessment
B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague	27 February 1989	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague	Backfit
B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements	20 September 1989	Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements
ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement	7 July 1989	Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement
ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626	5 July 1989	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626
JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl	28 September 1987	Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl	Reactor Vessel Water Level Probabilistic Risk Assessment Backfit Fatality
JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection	15 October 1987	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection	Backfit
JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex	31 December 1987	Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex
JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed	25 January 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed
JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site	18 April 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site
JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments	18 November 1988	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments	Fitness for Duty
JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants	27 February 1989	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants	Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Exemption Request Backfit
ML18093A633	1 February 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods
ML20011E486	7 February 1990	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209
ML20055F441	28 June 1990	Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR
ML20058E015	14 November 1993	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Exemptions in Accident Insurance for Nuclear Power Plants Prematurely Shut Down
ML20059P053	15 October 1990	Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal	License Renewal
ML20066J303	28 January 1991	Comment Supporting SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept
ML20077E823	8 December 1994	Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule	License Renewal
ML20078H043	1 February 1995	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lowpower Operations for Nuclear Reactors	Safe Shutdown
ML20079E218	30 September 1991	Submits Comments on NRC Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 23, Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Failure. Informs That Util Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC	Probabilistic Risk Assessment
ML20093G454	18 October 1995	Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning Procedures for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20147C319	6 January 1988	Comment Opposing SRP Section 3.6.3 of NUREG-0800.Utils Endorse Comments by Nuclear Util Group on Equipment Qualification	Weld Overlay
ML20147G355	5 February 1988	Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-0654,FEMA-REP-1,Rev 1,Suppl 1. Proposed Rule Change Jeopardizes Lives of Millions by Licensing Seabrook & Shoreham
ML20148R758	30 June 1997	Comment on NRC Proposed Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. Licensee References Proposed Generic Communication, Control Rod Insertion, & Ltrs & 961022 from B&W Owners Group	Shutdown Margin
ML20150A900	4 July 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology.Further Use of Subj Technology for ECCS Would Reduce Safety Assurances & Safety Benefits.Experience Shows That pipe-thinning Progresses Faster than Expected
ML20150A905	30 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology for safety-related Equipment.Nrc Reliance on leak-before-break Is Irrational Response to Very Real Safety Problem.Nrc Should Implement Mandatory Piping Insp	Earthquake
ML20150E860	6 February 1987	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150E895	8 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150E973	9 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150F139	2 July 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Expansion of Applicability of Leak Before Break Technology to Functional & Performance Requirements for ECCS & Environ Qualification
ML20150F195	2 July 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Expansion of Applicability of Leak Before Break Technology to Functional & Performance Requirements for ECCS & Environ Qualification	Earthquake
ML20150F357	19 February 1987	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150F393	23 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150F734	27 February 1987	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning.Nrc Should Mandate That States Provide Evacuation Plans
ML20150F750	27 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150F756	27 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150F781	27 February 1987	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150F784	28 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150F881	2 March 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150F897	2 March 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20150F931	2 March 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Ooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning	Earthquake
ML20150F954	3 March 1987	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20151A213	28 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20151A444	28 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20151A462	24 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Gvts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning
ML20151A467	24 February 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning

Semantic search

Query log

Navigation menu

Search