ML112620102

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:02, 29 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Final Outlines (Folder 3)
ML112620102
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/25/2011
From:
Exelon Nuclear
To: Caruso J
Operations Branch I
JACKSON D RGN-I/DRS/OB/610-337-5306
Shared Package
ML110030671 List:
References
TAC U01829
Download: ML112620102 (26)
v • d • e


Text

ES-402 Written Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Facility:

TM I Date of Exam: 08/29/11 RO KiA Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier K K A A A A G Total A2 G* Total 6 2 3 4

  • 1. Emergency

& Plant Evaluations 1 3 3 1 4 3 2 5 18 9 27 3 2 5 3 2 5 6 4 10 2 3 28 2 3 5 2. Plant Systems 2 Tier Totals 3 3 1 4 10 38 0 2 4 4 3 8 3. Generic Knowledge

&Abilities 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 Note 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KIA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the Tier Totals in each KIA category shall not be less than two). 2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by 1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions.

The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points. 3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to section D.1.b of ES-401, for guidance regarding elimination of inappropriate KIA statements.

4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.
5. Absent a plant specific priority, only those KAs having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected.

Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

6. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and KIA categories.

7: The generic (G) KlAs in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KIA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.1.b of ES-401 for the applicable KIA's 8. On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IR) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category.

Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above. If fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams. 9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the KIA Catalog, and enter the KIA numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3.

Limit SRO selections to KlAs that are linked to 10CFR55.43 Form ES-401-2 Written Examination Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions

-Tier 1 Group EAPE#/Name Safety Function K1 I K21 K31 A1 A2 G KIA Topic(s) Imp. I Q# I AA2.01 Ability to determ ine and I I interpret the following as they apply to 077 / Generator Voltage and E:lectric X Generator Voltage and Electric Grid 3.6 79 Grid Disturbances Disturbances:

Operating point on the I qenerator capability curve EA2.1 -Ability to determine and i interpret the following as they apply to *E02 / Reactor Trip -Stabilization the (Vital System Status Verification): 4.0 84 Recovery i Facility conditions and selection of appropriate procedures during abnormal and emergency operations i EA2.05 Ability to determine or interpret the fotJolNing as they apply to a'055 i Station Blackout / 6 3.7 80 I Station Blackout:

When battery is approaching fully discharged i 2.1.20 Conduct of Operations:

Ability 0381 Steam Generator Tube Rupture 13 to interpret and execute procedure 4.6 93 I steps. 2.1.25 -Conduct of Operations:

Ability 015 117 I Reactor Coolant l:lump X to interpret reference materials.

such as 4.2 91 Malfunctions I 4 graphs, curves, tables, etc. 2.4.45 -Emergency Procedures I Plan: , Ability to prioritize and interpret the 0561 Loss of Off-site Power i 6 4.3 81 significance of each annunciator or alarm. EK1.3 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to the (Post-Trip E 1 0 I Reaclor Trip -Stabilization X Stabilization)

Annunciators 4.0 8 Recovery 11 conditions indicating signals, and remedial actions associated with the (Post -Trip Stabilization).

AK1.01 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts 008 I Pressurizer Vapor as they apply to a Pressurizer Vapor 3.2 65 Accident I Space Accident:

Thermodynamics flow characteristics of open or AK1.01 -Knowledge of the implications of the following as they apply to Loss of 0541 Loss of Main Feedwater I 4 4.1 11 I Feedwater (MFW): MFW line break depressurizes the SIG (similar to a steam line break) i AK2.03 -Knowledge of the interrelations between the Loss of 025 I Loss of Residual Heat Removal Residual Heat Removal System and 2.7 52 ,System 14 the follolNing:

Service water or closed cooling water pumps EK2.2 -Knowledge of the interrelations between the (Excessive Heat Transfer) and the following: Facility's heat E05 I Steam Line Rupture removal systems, including primary 4.2 4 Heat Transfer I coolant, emergency coolant, the heat removal systems, and between the proper operation of systems to the operation of the AK2.05 -Knowledge of 077 I Generator Voltage and interrelations between Generator

  • 3 1 40 Grid Voltage and Electric Grid Disturbances i and the following:

Form ES-401-2 TMI Written Examination Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions

-Tier 1 Group EAPE#/Name Safety G KIA Topic(s) Imp. I Q# I AK3.02 Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply to the Loss of Nuclear Service Water 062 I Loss of Nuclear Service. Water I The automatic actions (alignments) 3.6 53 4 within the nuclear service water resulting from the actuation of the ESFAS EK3.03 Knowledge of the reasons for 0291 Anticipated Transient the following responses as they apply 3.7 46 Scram (ATWS) to the ATWS: Opening BIT inlet and outlet valves AK3.02 -Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 058 1 Loss of DC Power 1 6 4.0 21 to the Loss of DC Power: Actions contained in EOP for loss of dc power EA 1.05 -Ability to operate and monitor 009 1 Small Break LOCA I 3 the following as they apply to a small 3.4 25 break LOCA: CCWS EA 1.02 -Ability to operate and monitor 055 I Station Blackout 1 6 the following as they apply to a Station 4.3 17 Blackout:

Manual ED/G start AA 1.05 -Ability to operate and 1 or 057 I Loss of Vital AC monitor the following as they apply to 3.2 60 Instrument Bus the Loss of Vital AC Instrument Bus: Backup instrument indications AA2.13 -Ability to determine and 027 I Pressurizer Pressure interpret the following as they apply to 2.8 42 System Malfunction I the Pressurizer Pressure Control Malfunctions:

Seal return flow EA2.1 Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to E04 I Inadequate Heat Transfer the (Inadequate Heat Transfer)

Facility 3.2 74 Loss of Secondary Heat Sink I conditions and selection of appropriate procedures during abnormal and emergency operations.

EA2.01 Ability to determine or interpret the following as they apply to a 011 I Large Break LOCA I 3 Large Break LOCA: Actions to be 4.2 67 taken, based on RCS temperature and pressure -saturated and superheated 2.4.31 -Emergency Procedures 1 Plan: 065 I Loss of Instrument Air 18 X Knowledge of annunciator alarms, 4.2 37 indications, or response procedures.

2.1.28 -Conduct of Operations:

038 I Steam Generator Tube Rupture Knowledge of the purpose and function 4.1 9of major system components and controls.

2.2.44 -Equipment Control: Ability to interpret control room indications to verify the status and operation of a 056 I Loss of Off-site Power I 6 3.7 47 system, and understand how operator actions and directives affect plant and system conditions.

KIA CategoryTotals 3 3 3 3 3/3 3/3 Group Point Total: I 18/6 Form ES-401-2 Written Examination Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions

-Tier 1 Group L-__ __

____

____________

T_OP_i_C(_S_)

_________

1 Imp. Q# I__ I I AA2.01 -Ability to determine and I interpret the follovving as they apply to 005 Ilnoperable/Stuck Control Rod / the Inoperable f Stuck Control Rod: 1 4.1 90 1 Stuck or inoperable rod from and ex-core NIS, in-core or temperature AA2.1 -Ability to determine interpret the follovving as they apply to the (Refueling Canal Level Decrease)

.AOS f Fuel Handling AccidEnt 18 1 4.0 i 78 Facility conditions and seection of appropriate procedures during I i abnormal and emergency operations.

2.1.32 -Conduct of Operations:

Ability 037 I Steam Generator Tube Leak! 3 X to explain and apply all system limits 4.0 and 2.4.18 -Emergency Procedures I Plan: !A06! Control Room Evac. I 8 Knowledge of the specific bases for 4.0 98 EOPs. EK1.2 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts I as they apply to the (Natural E09 I Natural Circ. 14 X Circulation Cool down) Normal, 3.7 63 abnormal and emergency operating

," procedures associated with (Natural Circulation Cooldown). AK2.1 Knovviedge of the interrelations between the (Shutdown Outside Control Room) and the following:

Components, and functions of control A061 Control Room Evac. 18 3.8 44 and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes, and automatic and I manual features. " AK3.02 -Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply ! 067 I Plant Fire On-site I 8 to the Plant Fire on Site Steps called 2.5 35 out in the site fire protection plan, FPS manual, and fire zone manual 1 1 AA 1.22 -Ability to operate and I or I monitor the following as they apply 0241 Emergency Boration 11 X the Emergency Boration:

Safety 45 I injection valves, switches, flow meters, I and indicators I EA2.1 -Ability to determine and ! i interpret the follovving as they apply to I the (EOP Enclosures):

Facility E14! EOP Rules and Enclosures 15 3.4 69 conditions and selection of appropriated procedures during abnormal and emergency operations.

2.4.8 -Emergency Procedures I Plan: Knowledge of how abnormal operating A04 I Turbine Trip I X 3.8 12 procedures are used in conjunction with EOP*s. 2.2.38 -Equipment Control: Knowledge

  • 059 / Accidental Liquid RadWaste X of conditions and limitations in the 3.6 30 Release 19 facility license. AA 1.01 -Ability to operate and I or monitor the following as they apply to 032 I Loss of Source Range Nuclear X the Loss of Source Range Nuclear 3.1 61 Instrumentation / 7 Instrumentation:

Manual restoration of power ES-402 Form ES-401-2 Written Examination Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions

-Tier 1 Group EAPE#/Name Safety Function KIA Topic(s) AK1.3 Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to the (Loss of NNI-Y) A031 Loss NNI-x/Y 17 X 3.0 75 Annunciators and conditions indicating signals, and remedial actions associated with the (NNI-Y). KIA Category Totals 2 1 1 2 1/2 2/2 Group Point Total: I 9/4 Form ES-401-2 System #/Name 026 Containment Spray 061 Auxiliary/Emergency Feedwater 006 Emergency Core Cooling 064 Emergency Diesei Generator 003 Reactor Coolant Pump 003 Reactor Coolant Pump X 061 Auxiliary/Emergency X Feedwater 005 Residual Heat Removal 004 Chemical and Volume Control 007 Pressurizer Relief/Quench Tank 026 Containment Spray 012 Reactor Protection TMI Written Examination Outline Plant Systems -Tier 2 Group 1 KIA Topic(s) A2.01 Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the CSS; and {b} based on those X predictions.

use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Reflux boiling pressure spike when first going on recirculation A2.08 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following ma.lfunctions or operations on the AFW; and (b) based on those predictions.

use procedures to X correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Flow rates expected from various combinations of AFW pump discharoe valves 2.2.37 -Equipment Control:.

Ability X to determine operability and lor availability of safety related equipment i 2.1.32 -Conduct of Operations:

X Ab.lity to explain and apply all limits and precautions.

2.2.36 -Equipment Control: Ability to analyze the effect of X maintenance activities.

such as degraded power sources. on the status of limiting conditions for operations.

K 1.13 -Knowledge of the physical

  • connections and/or cause-effect relationships between the RCPS and the following systems: RCP bearing lift oil Dump K1 .04 -Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-effect relationships between the AFW and the following systems: RCS K2.01 -Knowledge of bus power X supplies to the following:

RHR Dumps K2.01 -Knowledge of bus power X supplies to the following:

Boric acid makeup pumps K3.01 Knowledge of the effect X that a loss or malfunction of the PRTS will have on the following:

Containment K3.01 -Knowledge of the effect X that a loss or malfunction of the CSS will have on the following:

CCS K4.06 Knowledge of RPS design feature(s) and/or interlock(s)

X which provide for the following:

Automatic or manual enable/disable of RPS trips Imp. I Q# I 3.0 99 2.9 100 4.6 89 2.8 82 4.2 83 2.5 41 3.9 2 3.0 51 2.9 23 3.3 64 3.9 24 3.2 56 Form ES-401-2 Written Examination Plant Systems -Tier 2 Group System KJA Topic(s) K4.04 -Knowledge of MRSS design feature(s) and/or interlock(s) which provide for the 039 Main and following:

Utilization of steam Xpressure program control when steam dumping through atmospheric relief/dump valves, including T-ave. limits K5.02 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the 013 Engineered Safety following concepts as they apply Features Actuation to the ESFAS: Safety system logic and reliability K4.20 -Knowledge of ECCS design feature(s) and/or 006 Emergency interlock(s) which provide for the Xfollowing:

Automatic closure of common drain line and fill valves to accumulator.

K6.07 -Knowledge of the effect of 064 Emergency a loss or malfunction of the following will have on the ED/G system: Air receivers K6.03 -Knowledge of the effect of 010 Pressurizer a loss or malfunction of the Xfollowing will have on the PZR pcs: PZR sprays and heaters A 1.02 -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to prevent exceeding design limits) 076 Service Water associated with operating the SWS controls including:

Reactor and turbine building closed cooling water temperatures.

A 1.07 -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to prevent exceeding design limits) 059 Main Feedwater associated with operating the MFW controls including:

Feed Pump speed, including normal control speed for ICS AZ.15 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the ac distribution system; and (b) 062 AC based on those predictions, use X procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Consequence of paralleling phase/mismatch in volts A2.08 Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the CCWS, and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to 008 Component Cooling correct, control, or mitigate the Water consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Effects of shutting (automatically or otherwise) the isolation valves of the letdown cooler Imp. I Q# I 2.9 14 2.9 26 3.2 49 2.7 20 3.2 43 2.6 13 2.5 6 2.8 18 2.5 59 ES-402 Form ES-401-2 System #/Name 063 DC Electrical Distribution 078 Instrument Air 073 Process Radiation Monitoring 103 Containment 022 Containment Cooling 062 AC Electrical Distribution 004 Chemical and Volume Control 059 Main Feedwater 003 Reactor Coolant Pump 005 Residual Heat Removal 039 Main and Reheat Steam 063 DC Electrical Distribution KIA Category Totals Written Examination Plant Systems -Tier 2 Group KIA Topic(s) A3.01 Ability to monitor automatic operation of the dc X electrical system, including:

Meters, annunciators, dials, recorders, and indicating lights A3.01 Ability to monitor X automatic operation of the lAS, including:

Air pressure A4.02 Ability to manually operate X and/or monitor in the control room Radiation monitoring system control panel A4.04 Ability to manually operate X andlor monitor in the control room: Phase A and phase B resets 2.4.2 Emergency Procedures

/ Plan: Knowledge of system set X points, interlocks and automatic actions associated with EOP entry conditions.

2.4.47 -Emergency Procedures

/ Plan: Ability to diagnose and X recognize trends in an accurate and timely manner utilizing the appropriate control room reference material.

K5.26 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the X following concepts as they apply to the CVCS: Relationship between VCT pressure and NPSH K3.03 Knowledge of the effect X that a loss or malfunction of the MFW will have on the following:

S/GS A3.03 -Ability to monitor X automatic operation of the RCPS, including:

Seal DIP A 1.03 -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to prevent exceeding design limits) X associated with operating the RHRS controls including:

Closed cooling water flow rate and temperature 2.4.46 -Emergency Procedures

/ X Plan: Ability to verify that the alarms are consistent with the plant conditions.

K4.01 -Knowledge of de electrical system design feature(s) and/or X interlock(s) which provide for the following:

Manual/automatic transfers of control 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 2/2 2, 2 3/3 Group Point Total: 2.7 22 3.1 38 3.7 28 3.5 54 4.5 72 4.2 68 3.1 48 3.5 5 3.2 39 2.5 50 4.2 10 ';

ES-401 Form ES-401-2 TMI Written Examination Outline Plant Systems -Tier 2 Group 2 System #/Name KIA Topic{s) Imp. I Q# I I ! A2.02 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the Waste Gas Disposal System' and (b) based on those predictions.

071 Waste Gas Disposal X use procedures to correct. control. 3.6 86 or mitigate the consequences of tilose malfunctions or operations:

Use of waste gas release monitors.

radiation.

gas flow rate. and totalizer 2.2.12 Equipment Control: 086 Fire Protection X Knowledge of surveillance 3.4 94 procedures.

A2.03 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following functions or operations on the Containment Purge System: and 029 Containment Purge X (b) based on those predictions.

use procedures to correct, control. 3.1 77 or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Startup operations and the associated required valve lineups K5.01 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the 014 Rod Position Indication X following concepts as they apply to the RPIS: Reasons for 2.7 58 differences between RPIS and step counter A 1.05 -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to! prevent exceeding design limits) 045 Main Turbine Generator X associated with operating the MT/G system controls including:

3.8 15 Expected response of primary plant parameters (temperature and pressure) followinQ T/G trip A3.01 -Ability to monitor 072 Area Radiation Monitoring

! X automatic operation of the ARM system. including:

Changes in 2.9 29 ventilation alignment K3.01 -Knowledge of the effect !017 In-core Temperature Monitor X that a loss or malfunction of the ITM system will have on the following:

Natural circulation 3.5 66 I indications I I K1.01 -Knowledge of the physical 027 Containment Iodine Removal XI connections and/or cause-effect relationships between the CIRS 3.4 70 I and the following systems: CSS 1 I 2.4.8 -Emergency Procedures I 011 Pressurizer Level Control X Plan: Knowledge of how abnormal operating procedures are used in 3.8 71 I I conjunction with EOP*s. 035 Steam Generator J Ix i A4.05 -Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: Level Control to enhance natural circulation 3.8 3 K4.03 -Knowledge of design feature(s) and/or interlock(s) 029 Containment Purge X I 3.2 which provide for the following:

27 I I Automatic purge isolation ES-401 Form ES-401-2 Written Examination Plant Systems -Tier 2 Group System #/Name KIA Topic(s) Imp. I Q# I K2.02 -Knowledge of bus power supplies to the following:

One-line 001 Control Rod Drive X 3.6 57 diagram of power supply to trip breakers A2.03 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the circulating water system: and (b) based on those predictions, use 075 Circulating Water X procedures to correct, control, or 2.5 16 mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Safety features and relationship I between condenser vacuum, turbine trip, and steam dump KIA Category Totals J 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1/2 1 1 1/1 '. Group Point Total: I 10/3 ES-401 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3) Form ES-401-3 Facility:

TMI Date: Category KA# Topic RO SRO-Only IR Q# IR Q# Ability to locate control room switches, controls, and 2.1.31 indications, and to determine that they correctly reflect 4.6 19 the desired plant lineup. Ability to use procedures to determine the effects on 2.1.43 reactivity of plant changes, such as RCS temperature, 4.1 7 secondary plant, fuel depletion, etc. 1. Cond uct of Operations 2,1.35 Knowledge of the fuel-handling responsibilities of SRO's. 39 76 Ability to use procedures related to shift staffing.

such 2,1.5 as minimum crew complement, overtime limitations, 39 96 etc. Subtotal 2 2 Ability to manipulate the console controls as required 2.2.2 to operate the facility between shutdown and 4.6 62 designated power levels. 2.2.14 Knowledge of the process for controlling equipment configuration or status. 3.9 31 2. Equipment Control 2.2.5 Knowledge of the process for making design or operating changes to the facility.

3.2 95 2.2.23 Ability to track Technical Specification limiting conditions for operations.

4,6 85 Subtotal 2 2 2.3.7 Ability to comply with radiation work permit requirements during normal or abnormal conditions.

3.5 32 Knowiedge of Radiological Safety Principles pertaining 2.3.12 to licensed operator duties. such as containment entry requirements.

fuel handling responsibilities.

access to 3.2 34 locked high-radiation areas, aligning filters, etc. 3. Radiation 2.3.4 Knowledge of radiation exposure limits under normal or emergency conditions.

3.2 33 Control 2.3.6 Ability to approve release permits. 3.8 87 Subtotal 3 1 I I ES-401 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3) Form ES-401-3 2.4.34 2.4.43 2.4.17 4. Emergency Procedures I 2.4.5 Plan 2.4.0 Subtotal iTier 3 Point Total: Knowledge of RO tasks performed outside the main control room during an emergency and the resultant 4.2 73 operational effects. Knowledge of emergency communications systems 3.2 36 and Knowledge of EOP terms and definitions.

3.9 Knowledge of the organization of tile procedures network for normal. abnormal, and 4.3 Knowledge of low power! shutdown implications accident (e.g., loss of coolant accident or loss of 4.2 residual heat removal) mitigation 7 Wo* 2 E8-401 Record of Rejected KIA's Form E8-401-4 Tier 1 Group Randomly Selected KA 2/1 039 / K4.02 replaced by 039 1 K4.04 2/2 028 / K2.01 replaced by 001 I K2.01 2/2 028 I A2.03 replaced by 029/ A2.03 2/2 001 1 K2.01 replaced by 001 / K2.02 2/1 064 1 2.1 .19 replaced by 064 I 2.1.32 2/2 071 1 A2.03 replaced by 071 I A2.02 2/1 010 1 K6.04 replaced by 010 1 K6.03 2/1 0071 K5.02 replaced by 0041 K5.26 2/1 063 I K2.01 replaced by 0631 K4.01 2/2 034 I A3. 0 1 replaced by 072 I A3.01 3/1 G1 I 2.1.45 replaced by G1 12.1.35 3/1 G1 12.1.25 replaced by G1/2.1.5 0621 AK3.04 1 11 replaced by 062 1 AK3.02 1 11 0561 2.4.46 replaced by 056 1 2.2.44 3/4 G41 2.4.40 replaced by G4 1 2.4.43 2/2 079/2.2.12 replaced by 086/2.2.12 2/1 006 I K5.01 replaced by 006 K4.20 1/2 E141 EA2.2 replaced by E14/ EA2.1 I Reason for Rejection The Facility does NOT have Tave control(MS and reheat is an input to Tave The Hydrogen Recombiners have been re-classified as no safetx: related at The Hydrogen Recombiners have been re-classified as no safety related at I The subject KIA isn't relevant at the subject facility.

It isn't possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question !related to the subject It isn't possible to prepare a psychometrically sound related to the subiect RCDT operations were oversampled on the RO Exam.

5 and 40 also focus on RCDT KAs involving RCDT Operations have been over-sampled.

NRC Examiner Feedback indicating that this KA would not a discriminating question, and the appropriate level of NRC Examiner requires re-select based on Refueling being performed by contracted personnel rather than NRC Examiner Feedback indicating that this KA may not the construction of a written exam question at the level by NRC Examiner Feedback indicating that this KA may not the construction of a written exam question at the level by Effect of a Loss of CCW on NR Flow is non existent at NRC Examiner Feedback indicated a potential to over sample between writteln and operational evaluated; and replaced KIA. NRC Examiner feedback indicated this may not yield a greater than LOD1 guestion if asked at the RO level. NRC Examiner Feedback discussion agreed that Station Air at TMI is very low safety significance re-picked system. I Randomly selected new K in same system after original attempt

  • to write to K5.01 rejected by NRC Examiner NRC determine tie to FSAR did not meet facility license and i amendment portion of KIA, keep question changed KIA ! I Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:

Three Mile Date of Examination:

August 2011 Examination Level: RO SRO Operating Test Number: 289-2011-301 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (See Note) Code* Verify watch standing requirements

-Work-hour Rules Conduct of N/R 2.1.5 (2.9) Calculate an Estimated Critical Rod Position.

Conduct of N/R 2.1.37 (4.a) Isolate a component for maintenance.

Equipment N/R 2.2.41 Radiation N/A Category not selected for RO applicants Perform State and Local Event Notification Emergency D/S 2.4.43 All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they retaking only the administrative topics, when 5, are

  • Type Codes & (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or (D)irect from bank (:s 3 for ROs; S 4 for SROs & RO (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (P)revious 2 exams (:s 1; randomly ES 301, Page 22 of 27 ES-301 Administrative Outline Form ES-301-1 THREE MILE ISLAND 2011 NRC RO EXAMINATION CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS (A1-1): Verify watch standing requirements

-Work-hour rules. Given a shift schedule for the cycle and reference LS-AA-11 g, Overtime Controls, identify which requested days the candidate can work while not violating Work-hour rules. This JPM is a new JPM. License is evaluated against properly identifying the allowable and forbidden overtime shifts lAW 119. Safety significance, failure to select the correct shifts will lead to Work-hour rule violations and possible fatigue issues. Failure to properly staff a Control Room crew is also a violation of 10CFR. CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS (A1-2): Calculate an Estimated Critical Position.

Given plant conditions and references OP-TM-300-000, "Reactivity and power distribution calculations" and OP-TM-300-403, "Estimated Critical Rod Positions" calculate an estimated critical rod condition.

This is a New J PM updated for the current core load and also using a new series of procedures.

The old JPM used one procedure with all attached graphs, the new operations procedures uses a calculation procedure and a reference procedure additionally the Calculated point IS out side the tolerance band for the old calculation.

License is evaluated against a job done by reactor operators with measurements of using correct graphs and doing math properTy.

Several opportunities for error exist in similar named graphs and applying curve data in the wrong direction.

Safety significance, failure to calculate an estimated critical rod position properly could lead to reactor being taken critical at an unexpected rod height. EQUIPMENT CONTROL (A2): Isolate a component for maintenance.

This is a new JPM. The candidate must determine the isolation pOints for removal of a relief valve to repair a flange leak. Safety significance This failure to adequately isolate the leak prior to removing the relief or opening vent and / or drain prior to isolating the relief would result in RCS water leaking into containment and a reduction in shielding water above the core. RADIATION CONTROL (A3): Category not selected for RO Candidates.

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES/PLAN (A4): ERO Notification with a faulted sheet. This JPM is from the LORT bank. RO Candidate will be given a State and Local Notification Form with Errors that need to be identified.

The Candidate will then Simulate initiating a State and Local notification on the NARS line. This is a time critical JPM. Failure to make timely and accurate notification to State and Local emergency management agencies could lead to a degradation of safety of public if agencies can not plan and execute tneir responsibilities in a timely fashion.

    • Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:

Three Mile Island Date of Examination:

August 2011 Examination Level: RO D SRO [gI Operating Test Number: 289-2011-301 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (See Note) Code* Maintain Minimum Shift Staffing, Control Conduct of Operations 2.1.5 (3.9) Review an Estimated Critical Rod Position Calculation for approval, identify any errors. Conduct of N/R 2.1.37 (4.6) Approve Isolation Points for a Component for Maintenance Equipment N/R 2.2.41 (3.9) Authorize emergency exposure in excess of 5 Radiation Control 2.3.4 (3.7) Identify and Declare an Emergency Classification and Associated PAR. Emergency N/R 2.4.44 (4.4) All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are

  • Type Codes & (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or (D)irect from bank 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (;:: (P)revious 2 exams 1; randomly ES 301, Page 22 of 27 ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 THREE MILE ISLAND 2011 NRC SRO EXAMINATION CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS (A1-1): Verify watch standing requirements

-Work-hour Given. plant conditions and referef')ces 001, Shift t'!1anning Requirements, Overtime Controls, a prepared Shift Staffing Report, LMS Qual Matrix Report, and a prepared Over List, identify required actions to restore mimmum staffin'g, and select personnel in accordance requirements to control overtime.

This JPM is significantly modified in that it incorporates rules lAW LS-AA-119, changing the requirements of whether personnel can report to work or License is evaluated against properly manning a shift lAW 10CFR and LS-AA-119.

Several for error exist in the fact that they must review 5 different documents to determine if personnel can Safety significance, failure to select the correct personnel will lead to Work-hour rule violations possible fatigue issues. Failure to properly staff a Control Room crew is also a violation of CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS (A1-2): Review an Estimated Critical Rod Position Calculation approval, identify any Given an Estimated Critical Rod Position previously calculated and references "Reactivity and power distribution calculations" and OP-TM-300-403, "Estimated Critical Rod review for SRO approval and identify errors if This is a New JPM updated for the current core load and also using a new series of procedures.

The Bank JPM used one procedure with all attached graphs, the new operations procedures uses calculation procedure and a reference procedure and additionally the numbers have changed to the new answer to be outside the range of the old License is evaluated against a job done by senior reactor operators with measurements of using graphs and doing matli properly.

Several for error exist in similar named graphs applying curve data in the wrong direction.

SRO should recognize that errors were made, identify and return for Safety significance, failure to calculate an estimated critical rod position properly could lead to being taken critical at an unexpected rod EQUIPMENT CONTROL (A2): Approve Isolation Points for a Component for Given a Worker Tag Out Clearance Form, review for approval.

A new created for ILT 10-1. submitted Tag Out Form omits required pOints and leavEls a group of breakers in the Off position Operations Authorization would come from an SRO. Safety significance is two valves do not have remote controls indicated with info tags nor their breakers open this could result in operation that drain the fuel handling canal if operated.

The restoration points are also wrong and could result in being able to appropriately respond to an excessive seal leak if the breakers were not RADIATION CONTROL (A3): Authorize emergency exposure in excess of 5 REM. Conditions are given for a non-contaminated injured individual in a high radiation area, rescue personnel must go through a highly contaminated area. Six volunteers to carry stretcher, candidate must recognize one individual can not volunteer as they have already received a once in a life time exposure, a second volunteer is Inot respirator qualified.

Safety significance failure to properly remove these volunteers could result in excessive exposure.

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES/PLAN (A4): Identify and Declare an Emergency Given a set of plant conditions declare an Emergency Classification.

This new JPM deals with an emergency classification (Time Critical) baseo on given plant conditions, and declaring the PAR also time License level is SRO as the Emergency Director is the position to declare an Safety significance events must be recognized and declared in a timely fashion to get the notifications and support. declaration of the PAR in a timely manor allows for the Slate to appropriate recommendations for public Control Room/In-Plant Outline Form ES-301-2 II Facility:

Three Mile Island Auaust 2011 Exam Level: RO 0 SRO-I IZl SRO-U Operating Test Number: 289-2011-301 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF) Safety System / Type Code* Function Respond to an Inoperable/Stuck Rod (005 AA1.01) D/S/L 1 Respond to a loss of Pressurizer Level Controller with Failures (011 N/S/A Transfer to Reactor Building Sump Recirculation (011 EA 1.05) D/S/LlAlEN 3 RCP #1 Seal Failure (003 A2.01) N/S/A 4P Restore 1 D BUS from SBO Operations (064 A2.09) N/S 6 g. Respond lAW OP-TM-MAP-C01 01 Alarm Response with Failure (072 M/S/A Cross Connect the Secondary River Water System to the Nuclear River MIS/AIL Water System (026 In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i. Manually Operate MU-V-20 and IC-V-4 (015/017 AA1.07) D/E/R 4P II j' . Local Start of EG-Y-1 B and Loading of 1 E 4160V bus (068 AA 1.10) N/E 8 Respond to a failure of EF-P-2A, and EF-V-30D (061 A2.04) M/E 4S I All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlaQ those tested in the control room. I*Type Codes Criteria for RO I SRO-I I (A)lternate path 4-6 I 4-6 I I (C}ontrol (D)irect from bank :5.9/ :5.8 I :5. ()E mer enc y or abnormal in-lant > 1 / >1 g p > 1 (EN)gineered safety feature -/ / 2: 1 (control room system (L)ow-Power

/ Shutdown 2: 1 / 2:1 / 2: 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2: 2 / 2:2 / 2: 1 (P)revious 2 exams :5. 3/ :5.3 / :5. 2 (randomly selected) (R)CA 2: 1 / 2: 1 I 2: 1 ES-301, Page 23 of 27 ES*301 Control Room/ln*Plant

....

.....C! Outline Form ES*301*2 THREE MILE ISLAND 2011 NRC SROI EXAMINATION JPM A -Respond to an Inoperable/Stuck Rod. Bank Safety significance failure to correct misalignment would result in operation out side of Specification requirements designed to ensure core power JPM B -Respond to a Loss of Pressurizer Level Controller with Failures.

New Alternate Safety significance failure to complete JPM will result in a loss of RCS JPM C -Transfer to Reactor Building Sump Recirculation, Bank Alternate path involving Safety Features Safety significance failure to recognize DH-V-6A failure to open will result in damage to one of available LPI trains during post accident conditions, seriously degrading safety margin. PRA HSROA switch over to sump following JPM D -Not used for Instant JPM E -RCP #1 Seal Failure. New Alternate path Safety significance failure to properly address excessive sealleakoff could reSUlt in Seal JPM F -Restore 1 D BUS from SBO Operations. Involves restoring the "A" train ES Bus from Station Blaclkout Diesel power to normal Off-Site Safety significance is improper operation could lead to loss of 1 train of ES components through loss ES bus, causing significant degradation in coping JPM G -Respond lAW OP-TM-MAP-C01 01 Alarm Response with Failure. Modified Alternate path to 2007 NRC JPM however this involves alternate Safety significance Failure to place control tower on "recirculation" following high airborne in the Control Room may result in unnecessary dose for the personnel that must remain to operate JPM H Cross Connect the Secondary River Water System to the Nuclear River Water System.

JPM, significantly updated to current procedures, change from 2007 NRC is the alternate Safety significance failure to complete the task would result in loss of adequate cooling for Services JPM I Manually Operate MU-V-20 and IC-V-4. Bank JPM In Plant Engineered Safety Features Safety significance failure to complete the task could result in a loss of Reactor Coolant Pump cooling, and subsequent JPM J -Local Start of EG-Y-1 B and Loading of 1 E 4160V bus. New JPM supplies power to the busses on Gontrol Room Evacuation.

Safety significance Remote shutdown capability only exists if tram power IS JPM K -Respond to a failure of EF-P-2A, and EF-V-30D.

Modified Bank JPM, old JPM involved bound pump, when restarted had to be done from switchgear.

Switchgear start is no longer in added failed open discharge control valve on Safety significance failwe to complete 1 st part of task could lead to inadequate secondary feed for loss steam dnven pump, 2 n part failure could lead to excessive heat Control Room/In-Plant

""I<C!TOrnQ Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:

Three Mile Date of Examination:

August 2011 Exam Level: RO D SRO-I D SRO-U Operating Test Number: 289-2011-301 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF) Safety System / Type Code* Function a. Respond to an Inoperable/Stuck Rod (005 AAD/S/L Sump Recirculation (011 EA 1.05) D/S/L/NEN 3 *I lAW OP-TM-MAP-C0101 Alarm ReSpOnSE!

with Failure (072 M/S/A ..... t Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i. Manually Operate MU-V-20 and IC-V-4 (015/017 D/E/R 4P j. Local Start of EG-Y-1 B and Loading of 1 E 4160V bus (068 AA 1.10) N/E All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions overlap those tested in the control

  • Type Criteria for RO I SRO-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6/ 4-6 / (C)ontrol (EN)gineered safety feature -/ -/ 1 (control room (P)revious 2 exams :::. 3/ :::.3 / :::. 2 (randomly (D)irect from bank :::.9/ :::.8 / :::. (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 / / (L)ow-Power

/ Shutdown 1 / / (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) / (R)CA 1 I / (S)imulator ES-301, Page 23 of ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Outline Form ES-301-2 THREE MILE ISLAND 2011 NRC SROU EXAMINATION JPM A-Respond to an Inoperable/Stuck Rod. Bank Safety significance failure to correct misalignment would result in operation out side of Speclficalion requirements designed to ensure core power JPM B -Not used for SRO Upgrade. JPM C -Transfer to Reactor Building Sump Recirculation, Bank Alternate path involving Engineered Safety Features equipment.

Safety significance failure to recognize DH-V-6A failure to open will result in damage to one of two available LPI trains during post accident conditions, seriously degrading safety margin. PRA SAHSR2 HSROA switch over to sump following LOCA JPM D -Not used for SRO Upgrade. JPM E Not used for SRO Upgrade. JPM F -Not used for SRO Upgrade. JPM G Respond lAW OP-TM-MAP-C01 01 Alarm Response with Failure. Modified Alternate path Similar to 2007 NRC JPM however this involves alternate Safety significance Failure to place control tower on "recirculation" following high airborne in the Control Room may result in unnecessary dose for the personnel that must remain to operate JPM H -Not used for SRO Upgrade. JPM I Manually Operate MU-V-20 and IC-V-4. Bank JPM In Plant Engineered Safety Features JPM. Safety significance failure to complete the task could result in a loss of Reactor Coolant Pump seal cooling, and subsequent LOCA. JPM J -Local Start of EG-Y-1 B and Loading of 1 E 4160V bus. New JPM supplies power to the protected on Gontro! Room Evacuation.

Safety significance Remote shutdown capability only exists if "8" train power IS available.

JPM K Not used for SRO Upgrade.

Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:

Three Mile Island Date of Examination:

August 2011 Exam Level: RO r8] SRO-ID SRO-U 0 Operating Test Number: 289-2011-301 i Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF) Safety System / JPM I Type Code* Function n.nC;:)jJullU Inoperable/Stuck Rod (005 i D/S/L i 1 Respond to a loss of Pressurizer Level Controller with Failures (011 N/S/A 2 A2.03) Transfer to Reactor Building Sump Recirculation (011 EA 1.05) D/S/LINEN 3 I I --itt-Rt:::>lult:

TBVs and ADVs to ICS Auto Control (041 D/S/L 4S RCP #1 Seal Failure (003 A2.01) N/S/A i 4P Restore 10 BUS from SBO Operations (064 A2.09) N/S I 6 I n OP-TM-MAP-C0101 Alarm Response with Failure M/S/A 7

)"U the S'-::vUIIU, River Water System to the Nuclear River M/S/NL 8 Water SY;::::I (026 AA2.02) I In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for Manually Operate MU-V-20 and IC-V-4 (015/017 AA 1.07) D/E/R 4P Local Start of EG-Y -1 B and Loading of 1 E 4160V bus (068 AA 1.1 0) N/E 8 Respond to a failure of EF-P-2A, and EF-V-30D (061 A2.04) M/E 4S I All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

  • Type i Criteria for RO I SRO-II SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-61 4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank I (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 I / 1 (EN)gineered safety feature -I -/ 1 (control room system (L)ow-Power I Shutdown 1 / / 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) / 1 i , (P)revious 2 / 2 (randomly selected) 1 / / 1 ES-301, Page 23 of 27

..--..ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Outline Form ES-301-2 THREE MILE ISLAND 2011 NRC RO EXAMINATION JPM A -Respond to an Inoperable/Stuck Rod. Bank Safety significance failure to correct misalignment would result in operation out side of Specification requirements designed to ensure core power JPM B -Respond to a Loss of Pressurizer Level Controller with Failures.

!\lew Alternate Safety significance failure to complete JPM will result in a loss of RCS JPM C -Transfer to Reactor Building Sump Recirculation, Bank Alternate path involving Safety Features Safety significance failure to recognize DH-V-6A failure to open will result in damage to one of available-LPI trains during post accident conditions, seriously degrading safety margin. PRA HSROA switch over to sump following JPM D -Restore TBVs and ADVs to ICS Auto Control. Bank Safety significance failure to complete the task would result in unnecessary steaming to resultmg In a loss of secondary inventory used for heat JPM E -RCP #1 Seal Failure. New Alternate path Safety significance failure to properly address excessive seal leakoff could result in Seal JPM F -Restore 1 D BUS from SBO Operations. Involves restoring the "A" train ES Bus from Station Blackout Diesel power to normal Off-Site Safety significance is improper operation could lead to loss of 1 train of ES components through loss ES bus, causing significant degradation in coping JPM G -Respond lAW OP-TM-MAP-C0101 Alarm Response with Failure. Modified Alternate path to 2007 NRC JPM however this involves alternate Safety significance Failure to place control tower on "recirculation" following high airborne in the Control Room may result in unnecessary dose for the personnel that must remain to operate JPM H -Cross Connect the Secondary River Water System to the Nuclear River Water System.

JPM, Significantly updated to current procedures, change from 2007 NRC is the alternate Safety significance failure to complete the task would result in loss of adequate cooling for Services JPM I -Manually Operate MU-V-20 and IC-V-4. Bank ,JPM In Plant Engineered Safety Features Safety significance failure to complete the task could result in a loss of Reactor Coolant Pump cooling, and subsequent JPM J Local Start of EG-Y-1 B and Loading of 1 E 4160V bus. New JPM supplies power to the busses on Control Room Evacuation.

Safety significance Remote shutdown capability only exists if train power is JPM K -Respond to a failure of EF-P-2A, and EF-V-30D.

Modified Bank JPM, old JPM involved bound pump, when restarted had to be done from switchgear.

Switchgear start is no longer in added failed open discharge control valve on Safety significance failwe to complete 1 st part of task could lead to inadequate secondary feed for loss steam driven pump, 2 n part failure could read to excessive heat D Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 Facility:

Three Mile Island Scenario No.: 2 Op Test No.: 289-2011-301 Examiners:

Initial Conditions:

Turnover:

I I Critical Tasks: Event No. Malt. No. MU01B ED18B I NI27A IC48 4 I FW15B RD0230 ED18A ICR02 ICR04 EG01A Operators:

-* (Temporary IC-52)

  • 100% Power, MOL Maintain 100% Power Operations
  • Establish FW Flow and Feed SG(s) (CT-10)
  • Electrical Power Alignment (CT-8) Protect against RCP Seal LOCA (CT-*)* Event Event Description MU-P-1 B Trips (TS), entry into OP-TM-AOP-041 (URO: ensures MU-V-32 is in HAND and closed, ARO: Starts P-1A)CARO TSCRS CCRS Loss of the 8 Bus (TS) with EG-Y-1 B failing to start, entry into TM-AOP-014(ARO: Starts the TSCRS Narrow Range Pressure Instrument Fails high with SASS failure to actuate, entry into OP-TM-MAP-G0308 IURO (URO: Closes Spray Valve, selects Alternate Pressure Instrument, IARO ARO: Manual control of Pressurizer Heaters) Loss of FW-P-1 B, entry into OP-TM-MAP-M01 07, Runback Fails to Occur, Power Reduction Performed, entry into RURO H0101 and 1102-4 TSCRS Stuck Rod (TS),. entry into Loss of OffsitaF'ower (tripping SBO output breaker), entry into TM-AOP-020 op-TM-EOP-001'\MARO EFW Valves for "A\ and "B" OTSG's fail to 0% in Auto, control required. CCRS "A" EDG fails to start. manual start required.
  • CURO * (N)ormal, (R)eactivity , (I)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)ajor -1 Appendix Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 Facility:

Three Mile Island Scenario No.: 3 Op Test No.: 289-2011-301 I

Operators:

Initial Conditions:

  • (Temporary IC-54)
  • 100% Power, MOL
  • EF-P-1 OOS for bearing replacement, 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> into a 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> clock T.S. 3.4.1.1 (2) Maintain 100% Power Operations
  • Reduce Steaming/Isolate Affected SGs (includes use of SG drains) (CT-22) ....__..
  • Minimize SCM (CT-7) Malf. No. Event Event Description 1 03A4S01 I Inadvertent ES Actuation, "B" Train (TS), entry into 046 IURO ZDIPB1 R (URO: Defeats signal, ARO: Opens MU-V-2NB)CBON IARO TSCRS 2 RC08B ICRS Tc Instrument Fails High, SASS Fails to Actuate, entry into IC51A TM-AOP-070 IURO (URO: Manual control of Control Rods, ARO: Manual control 01 IARO Feedwater) 3 TH17B CCRS -30 gpm "B" OTSG Tube Leak (TS), entry into OP-TM-EOP-005
. CURO (URO
Guide 9) TSCRS 4 N/A NCRS Power Reduction lAW 1102-4 R URO I NARO 5 CC04A CCRS Loss of ICCW, entry into OP-TM-AOP-032, OP-TM-EOP-001
  • CC04B CURO (URO: Trips Reactor) 6 M CRS -800 gpm "B" OTSG Tube Rupture, entry into OP-TM-EOP-005 M URO MARO MS09A CCRS "B" TBV's fail closed, entry into CARO (ARO: Places ADV on Backup Loader) MS09C * (N)ormal, (R)eactivity, (I)nstrument, (C)ompon l 21nt, (M)ajor Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 Facility:

Three Mile Island Scenario No.: 4 Op Test No.: NRC Operators: i Initial Conditions:

  • (Temporary IC-55)
  • 5% Power, MOL
  • EF-P-1 OOS for bearing replacement Turnover:

Continue with Power escalation Critical Tasks:

  • Control HPI (CT-5)
  • Isolate Overcooling SGs (CT-1 '7) I Event No. Malf. No. Event Event Description i 1 NCRS Raise Reactor Power from 5% to 2 IC37A Invalid "A" OTSG Low Level (TS), "A" EFW actuation, entry into OP-TM-424-90 1 IC41A . CARO ' (ARO: defeats invalid signal, secures EF-P-2A) i TSCRS lAO? CCRS Loss of Instrument Air, entry into IA01C CARO (ARO: Starts IA-P-1A or 4 CCRS Steam Leak into the Reactor Building, entry into OP-TM-AOP-051 CARO RR-P-1 B Fails to start (TS) TSCRS (ARO: Initiate RI3 Emergency Cooling) 5 THOS CCRS PORV fails open, entry into OP-TM-MAP-G01 06 CURO (LlRO: Closes PORV Block Valve) 6 R003C CCRS Uncontrolled outward rod motion, group 7, entry into 064 and OP-TM-EOP-001, Reactor Trip CURO , (URO: Selects Sequence Override, performs IMA's of EOP-001) 7 MS02B Steam Rupture in Reactor Building, entry into OP-TM-EOP-003, Excessive Heat Transfer, and OP-TM-EOP-01 0, Rule 3 to isolate . M URO "B" OTSG. MARO 8 MUR6? MU-V-36, MU-P-1A/1 B/1C RECIRC ISOL VALVE, breaker opens, Valve fails closed. Alternative minimum flow path for Makeup MUR94 CURO Pump established.
  • (N)ormal, (R)eactivity, (I) nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)ajor -1
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML112620102&oldid=1773011"