ML15352A065
| ML15352A065 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Three Mile Island  |
| Issue date: | 09/18/2015 |
| From: | Megill R Operations Branch I |
| To: | Carreras E Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15135A253 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC U01913 | |
| Download: ML15352A065 (12) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: ~r~e~7e Is~ ~r f Date of Examination: tJ9/£.3/zolS Developed by: Written: Facility ~ NRC D II Operating Facility ~NRC D Chief Target Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Date* Initials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)
~
-150 2. NRG examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
-150 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
~
-150 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
~
[-120) 5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3) filC/ {-90} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2, ES-401N-1/2, ES-401-3, ES-401N-3, ES-401-4, and ES-401 N-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) A:? {-85} 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRG and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e) {-60} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, ES-401 N-6, and any Form ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, or ES-301-2 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; ~ C.3.d)
-45 9. Written exam and operating test reviews completed. (C.3.f) flp
-30 10. Preliminary license applications (NRG Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
~
-21 11. Examination approved by NRG supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
~
-21 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
~
-14 13. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202)
~
-14 14. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRG supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
~
-7 15. Facility licensee management queried regarding the licensee's views on the examination. (C.2 j)
~
-7 16. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) ~
-7 17. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
......s-
-7 18. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRG examiners (C.3.i)
~
*Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. ES-201, Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: 09/28/2015 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
,.,..~
1. w
- a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
ct' ~ R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. D\ f'\~lt ~ T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. o{ f\>lt ~ E f'~\ ~ N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. I<*
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number 2.
f"\~l of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, s and major transients.
~
I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number M and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule u without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using L f'l'i\ A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. I~ T 0
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R
and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
'1' f\')l\- ~
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form T I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form o\ M~l~
~
(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensinQ examinations ct "~ ~
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subseauent days. <:>( l\)\t- l6-
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PAA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section. /'\~~ ~
°"
G E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. c.f Mlt-, ~
N E
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. of "'S" ~
R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~ NH* ~ A L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ~ ~lf. ~
- f. Assess whether the exam fits the apwopriate job level (RO or SRO). ck ~ ~
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
Rich Meaill I
,~
ko Mike Hartv I ~...Jl ~ Printed Name I Signature (;, ~~e/rs-(. 14 l~ Peter Presby I ..L.. ~* ; / / r.. rJ 7', ~"ks-'
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) 1... '
- d. NRC Supervisor lbwi..l~ EJ.... -*.l'...-.V /\XI Lit: I I '11It'1 '\
L_/ NOTE: # Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not annlicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 26 of 28
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ~ / z?JL_s' as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination mTo the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during
~ the week(s) of 9/JV;/15, 1blf}6" . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not ~ instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
~ below and authorized by the NRC. Ill co CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE
"'a "'-I G,i..(M/' ~+l.,..
N CX> . bf>.:S \,. :S"Tlltuc..,.~ie_
~ =-~~ -_f~~lL~~...t
~bf_">~~~ kJ...JZIJil/S_
t..R.O ¢7~1$ .'"AC*.* ,_.- ....... '"" ' /61"1> ....h_ SR._<:) l.f1111r **;v~~ C.1<- 'b CRD cl<ri 07P5 m <
~~Seme
¥,II'- r y *.:a :a 1-101116 ..k JPfl1J£_ --1.._
c11Ps $§'-{5"~bl111f1...,,, _1Pf1!r. ..k_
!!1lJK. _L_
Ge:() - ~ -1!'n!r -4=__ 5Ji:--O 1.' lifiF5' .1-CRO S/l:.o 7-15-15 N'\'11¥ °" <\
"J!Illlj; L
.!!!fIJK _ j _
NOTES: 12_ J
.1> S1_9n-m fl' ~r *h~\eeoV\ ... tJ1V'VI ~ L---TwD~vtr'
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of J/ Z.. o /r) as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination m To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during N the week(s) of ffrlit)--10)5/I> . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not
~ instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
"-a below and authorized by the NRC. ll> ca CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE N
"Q, 1h(p/,s- Ac><ln~~ ~IS..L
~~
N 00 ff5frr-Toh7ts--- S1M..J "'"'" Lt?-.o ~hlit:" - L0n1( *
~ ~
( ~s '\ CR.11 c; \\.o tfJ/11.
~eo fi1!i... ~
l L 'I Lnt) .JJi..!l.if:__ NOTES: I- s~n~o ot~ yer +e\ecolA --1\j{M ~- TC!VO ~VriJ<.,
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Date of Examination: 09/28/2015 Operating Test Number: 2015-301 Initials
- 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* c#
- a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
- b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
- c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA
- a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- initial conditions
- initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures
- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be timl! critical by the facility licensee
- operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Date
- a. Author 09/17/2015
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) °' /1c& ui;
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) 1/t8!ts-
- d. NRC Supervisor t'{/,/IS NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.
ES-301, Page 24 of 27
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: 09/28/2015 Scenario Numbers: 5 / x Ix Operating Test Number: 2015-301 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c#
- 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. c{ ,f'A-:.~ ,A-,
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ct f"l.".i.J.. A?
3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
- the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event I
- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew a{' ,.,..~ ~
- the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ..{- fv.%- ~
- 5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. 4 N'Vr ~
- 6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
~ b Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given. ,.,....~
- 7. The simulator modeling is not altered. ~ f'J'.,~ h
- 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ol j"\ '>\\- ~
- 9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. ot M~\\ ~
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 11.
(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3) cit
/'\~\Ir M'l\\r ti?
J1'
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
4 k'.>\\ ~
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. cV f"\\Y, LI?
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --
- 1. Malfunctions after EOP entry ( 1-2) 1 I x I x cj, /.11'1~ *~
- 2. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 I x I x
~ fA~\\- ~
- 3. Major transients (1-2) 1 I x I x ot fv\~\+ ~
- 4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 4 I x I x c\ ~~ /b?
- 5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 2 I x I x
~ {V\':,\~ pz:;
- 6. Critical tasks (2-3) 3 I x I x r¥' ~
NOTE: *The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
#Independent NRG reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301, Page 25 of 27
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: 09/28/2015 Operating Test Number: 2015-301 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E L N CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T N c A I A T s A B s A B s A B s A B L M N y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 u T p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p M(*) E R I u RX 1 1 0 RO D NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 1/2/5/8 3/5/6/8/9 9 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 2 2 2 1 ~ TS 3/6 1/2 4 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 RO D NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SR0-1-2 2/4/5/6/8/ l/C 1/2/3/5/8 3/5/6/8/9 15 4 4 2 ~ 9 SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 1/3 1/2 4 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 RO D NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SR0-1-3 l/C 2/4/5/6/8 1/2/5/8 2/3/5/8 13 4 4 2 ~ SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 1/3 3/6 4 0 2 2 RX 0 1 1 0 RO D NOR 0 1 1 1 SRO l/C 0 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 0 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO W'81icants. R s must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions. Instant S s must serve in both the SRO and the ATCfcositions, including at least two instrument or com~onent (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the A C position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in t e BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Ap~endix D. (*) Reactivitb and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component ma functions on a 1-for-1 asis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4. For licensees that use the ATC oi:ierator i:irimarily for monitorin?i plant parameters, the chief examiner may ~lace SRO-I annlicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best eva uate the SRO-I in manipulatinq plant contro s.
ES-301, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: 09/28/2015 Operating Test Number: 2015-301 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E L N CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I I c T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T N I A T s A B s A B s A B s A B L M N y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 u T p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p M(*) E R I u RX 6 1 1 1 0 R0-1 [8l NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I 1/C 2/4/5 1/2/3/6 2/3/6/9 11 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 R0-2 [8l NOR 0 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 3/5/6/8 1/2/3/5/8 9 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 2 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RX 6 1 1 1 0 R0-3 [8l NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 2/4/5 1/2/3/6 2/3/6/9 11 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 R0-4 [8l NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 3/5/6/8 1/2/3/5/8 2/3/5/6 13 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO CW81icants. R s must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions. Instant S s must serve in both the SRO and the ATC-fcositions, including at least two instrument or com~onent (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the A C Rosition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in t e BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward t e two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of ApRiendix D. (*) Reactivit~ and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component ma functions on a 1-for-1 asis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4. For licensees that use the ATC ORerator Rrimarily for monitorin~ plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best eva uate the SRO-I in manipulatina olant controls.
ES-301 , Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: 09/28/15 Operating Test No.: 2015-301 APPLICANTS RO D RO D RO D RO D SRO-I D SR0-1-2 ~ SR0-1-3 ~ SRO-I D Competencies SRO-U ~ SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1/2/3/4/ Interpret/ Diagnose 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 5161718 5161718 51617181 9 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 51617181 9 5161718 5161718 5161718 5161718 51617181 9 Procedures (1) Operate Control 1/2/3/4/ 2/3/4/5/ 51718 718 Boards (2) 1/2/3/4/ Communicate 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 5161718 5161718 51617181 9 and Interact 1/2/3/4/ Demonstrate 1/2/3/4/ 5/617/81 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 5161718 Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and 3,6 1/2 1/3 1/3 3/6 Use Tech Specs. (3) Notes: ( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (competency Rating Factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ES-301, Page 27 of 27
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: 09/28/15 Operating Test No.: 2015-301 APPLICANTS R0-1 ~ R0-2 ~ R0-3 ~ R0-4 ~ Competencies SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ Interpret/ Diagnose 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/61718 5/6/7/8 9 5/61718 9 5/6/7/8 5/61718 5/6/7/8 5/61718 9 Events and Conditions 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ Comply With and Use 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/61718 5/6/7/8 5/61718 5/6/7/8 5/6/7/8 5/6/7/8 5/61718 9 9 9 Procedures (1) Operate Control 2/5/6/7 1/2/4/6/ 2/3/4/5/ 3/4/5/6/ 2/3/4/5/ 2/5/6/7 1/2/4/6/ 21314151 3/4/5/6/ 1/2/3/4/ 7 61719 7/8 7/8 7 61719 7/8 51718 Boards (2) 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ Communicate 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 5161718 9 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech Specs. (3) Notes: ( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate evety applicable competency for evety applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (competency Rating Factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ES-301, Page 27 of 27
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Faci Iity: T\\lltl; Milt J:.<;1..P.Nl) Date of Exam: o"! /w/rr- Exam Level: R000SRO~ Initial Item Description a b* c#
- 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
ot ,..,)\t ~
- 2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.
- b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. a{* f"\Hr I~
- 3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 ot l"'~l\... ~
,. ~It t
- 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exam, consult the NRR OL program office).
ct-~ ~:- ~
- 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or _ the examinations were developed independently; or
~ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or cl Mr."- ~
_ other (explain)
- 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 1O percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only 4670 I 3bio lb70 I lfo°"/\J ~tf'/o I Y'isfo ~ /\'\., ~ ~
question distribution(s) at right.
- 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memorv C/A exam are written at the comprehension /analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 41.*1°1. I Y.0°10 s-Uio I foo"'70 ~ f"\~'tt ~
selected KAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right.
- 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. ~ f'\~ \.\- ~
- 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified ut* /""~ ,e?,,,.t'
- 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. !c:J !"\~\\. I~
- 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet ct- /\'ll'Yf ~'
Printr,ame I Signature Date
- a. Author tZtc.H Mc lrllL 1c~1~ " - I '.}lo LiL
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) M: .. \.o.e.\ \\~A-1 r ~ /Yt-1 J__---ff;:/j/ lv/1- It~
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) r, .,~ F:~-.A ,I .d. J - /'/i11 n / J I~~
'.i),,.,4L D j~KSo~ (~~/l
/
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor I
l!J.1,Ll5 r** Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-de~d examinations.
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Y.ll! Iv f!-~ OL prc1'.J'"'"" "~"~ Ct:f\S.Jl+. "+;,.." rQ.' .,;,ej( > '1 Ito \!~~+;.,. ,) .q., ES-401, Page 29 of 33
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Date of Exam: 0Q,/L15 / 1) Exam Level: RO l::><:.i SRO x __ j Item Description Initials a b c
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading ~
4 f"\ ~{~
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented or* ~A-M.su- ~~
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors
~
(reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ct /\4 )\t'
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, ..i/A-as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail /\J/Pt "'~ ~
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified wlA- ~
~IA- ~
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of o{
il questions missed by half or more of the applicants f1~l ~ Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader 1oh /,s-
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) l0/7fc:;-
I
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required .
. ES-403, Page 6 of 6
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: ~r~e~7e Is~ ~r f Date of Examination: tJ9/£.3/zolS Developed by: Written: Facility ~ NRC D II Operating Facility ~NRC D Chief Target Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Date* Initials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)
~
-150 2. NRG examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
-150 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
~
-150 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
~
[-120) 5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3) filC/ {-90} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2, ES-401N-1/2, ES-401-3, ES-401N-3, ES-401-4, and ES-401 N-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) A:? {-85} 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRG and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e) {-60} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, ES-401 N-6, and any Form ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, or ES-301-2 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; ~ C.3.d)
-45 9. Written exam and operating test reviews completed. (C.3.f) flp
-30 10. Preliminary license applications (NRG Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
~
-21 11. Examination approved by NRG supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
~
-21 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
~
-14 13. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202)
~
-14 14. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRG supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
~
-7 15. Facility licensee management queried regarding the licensee's views on the examination. (C.2 j)
~
-7 16. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) ~
-7 17. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
......s-
-7 18. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRG examiners (C.3.i)
~
*Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. ES-201, Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: 09/28/2015 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
,.,..~
1. w
- a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
ct' ~ R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. D\ f'\~lt ~ T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. o{ f\>lt ~ E f'~\ ~ N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. I<*
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number 2.
f"\~l of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, s and major transients.
~
I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number M and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule u without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using L f'l'i\ A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. I~ T 0
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R
and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
'1' f\')l\- ~
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form T I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form o\ M~l~
~
(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensinQ examinations ct "~ ~
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subseauent days. <:>( l\)\t- l6-
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PAA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section. /'\~~ ~
°"
G E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. c.f Mlt-, ~
N E
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. of "'S" ~
R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~ NH* ~ A L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ~ ~lf. ~
- f. Assess whether the exam fits the apwopriate job level (RO or SRO). ck ~ ~
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
Rich Meaill I
,~
ko Mike Hartv I ~...Jl ~ Printed Name I Signature (;, ~~e/rs-(. 14 l~ Peter Presby I ..L.. ~* ; / / r.. rJ 7', ~"ks-'
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) 1... '
- d. NRC Supervisor lbwi..l~ EJ.... -*.l'...-.V /\XI Lit: I I '11It'1 '\
L_/ NOTE: # Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not annlicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 26 of 28
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ~ / z?JL_s' as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination mTo the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during
~ the week(s) of 9/JV;/15, 1blf}6" . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not ~ instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
~ below and authorized by the NRC. Ill co CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE
"'a "'-I G,i..(M/' ~+l.,..
N CX> . bf>.:S \,. :S"Tlltuc..,.~ie_
~ =-~~ -_f~~lL~~...t
~bf_">~~~ kJ...JZIJil/S_
t..R.O ¢7~1$ .'"AC*.* ,_.- ....... '"" ' /61"1> ....h_ SR._<:) l.f1111r **;v~~ C.1<- 'b CRD cl<ri 07P5 m <
~~Seme
¥,II'- r y *.:a :a 1-101116 ..k JPfl1J£_ --1.._
c11Ps $§'-{5"~bl111f1...,,, _1Pf1!r. ..k_
!!1lJK. _L_
Ge:() - ~ -1!'n!r -4=__ 5Ji:--O 1.' lifiF5' .1-CRO S/l:.o 7-15-15 N'\'11¥ °" <\
"J!Illlj; L
.!!!fIJK _ j _
NOTES: 12_ J
.1> S1_9n-m fl' ~r *h~\eeoV\ ... tJ1V'VI ~ L---TwD~vtr'
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of J/ Z.. o /r) as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination m To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during N the week(s) of ffrlit)--10)5/I> . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not
~ instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
"-a below and authorized by the NRC. ll> ca CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE N
"Q, 1h(p/,s- Ac><ln~~ ~IS..L
~~
N 00 ff5frr-Toh7ts--- S1M..J "'"'" Lt?-.o ~hlit:" - L0n1( *
~ ~
( ~s '\ CR.11 c; \\.o tfJ/11.
~eo fi1!i... ~
l L 'I Lnt) .JJi..!l.if:__ NOTES: I- s~n~o ot~ yer +e\ecolA --1\j{M ~- TC!VO ~VriJ<.,
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Date of Examination: 09/28/2015 Operating Test Number: 2015-301 Initials
- 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* c#
- a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
- b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
- c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA
- a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- initial conditions
- initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures
- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be timl! critical by the facility licensee
- operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Date
- a. Author 09/17/2015
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) °' /1c& ui;
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) 1/t8!ts-
- d. NRC Supervisor t'{/,/IS NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.
ES-301, Page 24 of 27
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: 09/28/2015 Scenario Numbers: 5 / x Ix Operating Test Number: 2015-301 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c#
- 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. c{ ,f'A-:.~ ,A-,
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ct f"l.".i.J.. A?
3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
- the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event I
- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew a{' ,.,..~ ~
- the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ..{- fv.%- ~
- 5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. 4 N'Vr ~
- 6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
~ b Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given. ,.,....~
- 7. The simulator modeling is not altered. ~ f'J'.,~ h
- 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ol j"\ '>\\- ~
- 9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. ot M~\\ ~
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 11.
(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3) cit
/'\~\Ir M'l\\r ti?
J1'
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
4 k'.>\\ ~
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. cV f"\\Y, LI?
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --
- 1. Malfunctions after EOP entry ( 1-2) 1 I x I x cj, /.11'1~ *~
- 2. Abnormal events (2-4) 2 I x I x
~ fA~\\- ~
- 3. Major transients (1-2) 1 I x I x ot fv\~\+ ~
- 4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 4 I x I x c\ ~~ /b?
- 5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 2 I x I x
~ {V\':,\~ pz:;
- 6. Critical tasks (2-3) 3 I x I x r¥' ~
NOTE: *The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
#Independent NRG reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301, Page 25 of 27
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: 09/28/2015 Operating Test Number: 2015-301 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E L N CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T N c A I A T s A B s A B s A B s A B L M N y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 u T p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p M(*) E R I u RX 1 1 0 RO D NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 1/2/5/8 3/5/6/8/9 9 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 2 2 2 1 ~ TS 3/6 1/2 4 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 RO D NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SR0-1-2 2/4/5/6/8/ l/C 1/2/3/5/8 3/5/6/8/9 15 4 4 2 ~ 9 SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 1/3 1/2 4 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 RO D NOR 4 1 1 1 1 SR0-1-3 l/C 2/4/5/6/8 1/2/5/8 2/3/5/8 13 4 4 2 ~ SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 1/3 3/6 4 0 2 2 RX 0 1 1 0 RO D NOR 0 1 1 1 SRO l/C 0 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 0 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO W'81icants. R s must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions. Instant S s must serve in both the SRO and the ATCfcositions, including at least two instrument or com~onent (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the A C position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in t e BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Ap~endix D. (*) Reactivitb and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component ma functions on a 1-for-1 asis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4. For licensees that use the ATC oi:ierator i:irimarily for monitorin?i plant parameters, the chief examiner may ~lace SRO-I annlicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best eva uate the SRO-I in manipulatinq plant contro s.
ES-301, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: 09/28/2015 Operating Test Number: 2015-301 A E Scenarios p v 1 2 3 4 T M p E L N CREW CREW CREW CREW 0 I I c T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T N I A T s A B s A B s A B s A B L M N y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 u T p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p M(*) E R I u RX 6 1 1 1 0 R0-1 [8l NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I 1/C 2/4/5 1/2/3/6 2/3/6/9 11 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 R0-2 [8l NOR 0 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 3/5/6/8 1/2/3/5/8 9 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 2 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RX 6 1 1 1 0 R0-3 [8l NOR 4 4 2 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 2/4/5 1/2/3/6 2/3/6/9 11 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 RX 4 1 1 1 0 R0-4 [8l NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I l/C 3/5/6/8 1/2/3/5/8 2/3/5/6 13 4 4 2 D SRO-U MAJ 7 7 7 3 2 2 1 D TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO CW81icants. R s must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions. Instant S s must serve in both the SRO and the ATC-fcositions, including at least two instrument or com~onent (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the A C Rosition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in t e BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward t e two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of ApRiendix D. (*) Reactivit~ and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component ma functions on a 1-for-1 asis.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4. For licensees that use the ATC ORerator Rrimarily for monitorin~ plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best eva uate the SRO-I in manipulatina olant controls.
ES-301 , Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: 09/28/15 Operating Test No.: 2015-301 APPLICANTS RO D RO D RO D RO D SRO-I D SR0-1-2 ~ SR0-1-3 ~ SRO-I D Competencies SRO-U ~ SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1/2/3/4/ Interpret/ Diagnose 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 5161718 5161718 51617181 9 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 51617181 9 5161718 5161718 5161718 5161718 51617181 9 Procedures (1) Operate Control 1/2/3/4/ 2/3/4/5/ 51718 718 Boards (2) 1/2/3/4/ Communicate 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 5161718 5161718 51617181 9 and Interact 1/2/3/4/ Demonstrate 1/2/3/4/ 5/617/81 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 5161718 Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and 3,6 1/2 1/3 1/3 3/6 Use Tech Specs. (3) Notes: ( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (competency Rating Factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ES-301, Page 27 of 27
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: 09/28/15 Operating Test No.: 2015-301 APPLICANTS R0-1 ~ R0-2 ~ R0-3 ~ R0-4 ~ Competencies SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ Interpret/ Diagnose 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/61718 5/6/7/8 9 5/61718 9 5/6/7/8 5/61718 5/6/7/8 5/61718 9 Events and Conditions 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ Comply With and Use 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/6/7/8/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5/61718 5/6/7/8 5/61718 5/6/7/8 5/6/7/8 5/6/7/8 5/61718 9 9 9 Procedures (1) Operate Control 2/5/6/7 1/2/4/6/ 2/3/4/5/ 3/4/5/6/ 2/3/4/5/ 2/5/6/7 1/2/4/6/ 21314151 3/4/5/6/ 1/2/3/4/ 7 61719 7/8 7/8 7 61719 7/8 51718 Boards (2) 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ Communicate 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 51617181 1/2/3/4/ 1/2/3/4/ 5161718 5161718 9 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 9 5161718 5161718 and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech Specs. (3) Notes: ( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate evety applicable competency for evety applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (competency Rating Factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ES-301, Page 27 of 27
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Faci Iity: T\\lltl; Milt J:.<;1..P.Nl) Date of Exam: o"! /w/rr- Exam Level: R000SRO~ Initial Item Description a b* c#
- 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
ot ,..,)\t ~
- 2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.
- b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. a{* f"\Hr I~
- 3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 ot l"'~l\... ~
,. ~It t
- 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exam, consult the NRR OL program office).
ct-~ ~:- ~
- 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or _ the examinations were developed independently; or
~ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or cl Mr."- ~
_ other (explain)
- 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 1O percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only 4670 I 3bio lb70 I lfo°"/\J ~tf'/o I Y'isfo ~ /\'\., ~ ~
question distribution(s) at right.
- 7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memorv C/A exam are written at the comprehension /analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 41.*1°1. I Y.0°10 s-Uio I foo"'70 ~ f"\~'tt ~
selected KAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right.
- 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. ~ f'\~ \.\- ~
- 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified ut* /""~ ,e?,,,.t'
- 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. !c:J !"\~\\. I~
- 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet ct- /\'ll'Yf ~'
Printr,ame I Signature Date
- a. Author tZtc.H Mc lrllL 1c~1~ " - I '.}lo LiL
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) M: .. \.o.e.\ \\~A-1 r ~ /Yt-1 J__---ff;:/j/ lv/1- It~
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) r, .,~ F:~-.A ,I .d. J - /'/i11 n / J I~~
'.i),,.,4L D j~KSo~ (~~/l
/
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor I
l!J.1,Ll5 r** Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-de~d examinations.
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Y.ll! Iv f!-~ OL prc1'.J'"'"" "~"~ Ct:f\S.Jl+. "+;,.." rQ.' .,;,ej( > '1 Ito \!~~+;.,. ,) .q., ES-401, Page 29 of 33
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Date of Exam: 0Q,/L15 / 1) Exam Level: RO l::><:.i SRO x __ j Item Description Initials a b c
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading ~
4 f"\ ~{~
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented or* ~A-M.su- ~~
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors
~
(reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ct /\4 )\t'
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, ..i/A-as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail /\J/Pt "'~ ~
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified wlA- ~
~IA- ~
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of o{
il questions missed by half or more of the applicants f1~l ~ Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader 1oh /,s-
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) l0/7fc:;-
I
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required .
. ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}