ML113350223

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML113350223
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/16/2011
From: Caruso J
Operations Branch I
To:
Exelon Nuclear
JACKSON D RGN-I/DRS/OB/610-337-5306
Shared Package
ML110030671 List:
References
TAC-U01829
Download: ML113350223 (20)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201*1 Facility: I /14:]:- ~

/

f4!v if L Di3te of Examination: "hl-911- 0 flfI.TJ Developed by: Written - Facility ~. NRC D /I Operclting - Facility J!l NRC '111/11 ~ IfZ- t"{f'f" Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiners Inl1l.aIs

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)

.fA

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.E~)

<it1 JI

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

~/

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

~

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]

~ '11 .

{-7S} 6. Integrated examination ouDine(s) due, including Forms E5-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1 's, ES-401-1/2. ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) ), v~

{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

Cf\

If

{-4S} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-S, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, 9 and h; C.3.d) )L.

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398'5) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

'-Al f}'

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202)

~

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review V'

(C.2.h; C.3.f) \)\

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

~.

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor

-7 (C.2.1; C.3.h)

14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm

~

qualifications I eligibility; and examination <ipproval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) \Jj

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions '\

distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

~

  • Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examinatitn date identified in the corporate; notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES~201, Page 25 of 28

ES-201 Examination Outline Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: August 2011 Item Task Description

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

W R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

T T C. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or g4meric topics.

E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

a. Using Form ES--301-5, verify that the proposed scenario s,ats cover the required number
2. of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

S I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number M and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using L at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated A from the applicants' audit testes), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

T o c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form

/

T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on thetorm

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified 3 no more than one task is re eated from the last two NRC licensin examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix ensure that no items are du lieated on subse uent da .
4. lant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

G b_ Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

E N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

L

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

\

Pr'nted Name I Si.9naturll D?te

~

,,/

a. Author ,,/?r r~ /ztr: If
b. Facility Reviewer (*) 'UHts:;
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor (

NOTE: # Independent NRC Reviewer inftial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

  • Not a licable for NRC ared examination outlinE!s.

ES-201, Page 26 of 28

ES-201 Examination OuUine Quality Checklist Form ES-201*2 fr1~ WI( I TfT£ tAJ c~ lJuLv

'"~~

FaCl1ity: Three Mile Island / Date of ExamlnaJion: August 2011 Item Task Description a b*

1. a. Verify that the outllne{s) fites) the appropriate model, In accordance with ES~~01. 14I1J1A

." ~ (~

I1"f ",.

W R

I

b. Assess whe1her 1he. outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

d,.~

r' ,..

,"1i I

I'U T

T E

c. Assess Whether 1he outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions. or generic topics.

~ ~l N d. Assess whether 1he juslificalions for deselected or rejected KIA statements fll'8 appropriate. JQ)1 ~~ ~

I--

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number

~Il

2. of normal evolutions, Instrument and component failures. lechnical specifications, and major transients. tV/A N;II S

I b. Assess whether 1here are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number M and mix of applicants In accordance with the expected crew composition and ro1ation schedule U

L without compromislng exam integrity. and ensure that each applicant can be tested uslng r//A #(A at least one new or significantly modified scenario. that no scenarios are dUJ:dlcated A from the applicants' audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

T

  • 0
c. To the eldeflt possible, assess Whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R

and quantitative criteria specified on Form E9-301-4 and described in Appendix O. NIA JJ(fi

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets 1he criteria specified on Form ES*301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s}

N/A }J/A T

(4) the number of new Of modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path. Iow-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the etiteria on the form

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task Is new or significantly modified AJ/fi tJI,4 (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensina examinations

c. Determine If 1here are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subseQuent days. rJlA AliA
4. a Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section. tJ Ijl NIA:

G E b. Assess whether the to CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling Is appropriate. NIP! }i1A.

N I c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant*speclfic priorities) are at least 2.5. rJlA PIA E

R I d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. NIA NIl.

A L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. N / P- AllA .I
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). rJ/A AlIA ~

I Printed 6 Nam~ ~ Date

a. Author Grea Hoek

~ (.i rY""

b. Facility Reviewer (*) JoselJh Kulaslnskv

...,-;,IJ..J <<.A,M,iJ ' l ; L t:M~{ :L~_

"2.4 /I

c. NRC Chief Examiner (/Ii)
d. NRC Supervisor 11.w.a.t.n~ . .L.. ..1l.o.u ///.u::JlJlf' * ' 7 / t(

.... ()

NOTE: , Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column *c~ief examiner concurrence required.

  1. < Not applicable for NRC-preoared examination outlines.

ES-201, Page 26 of 28

O,uty ES-201 Examination Outline Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: August 2011 h=

Initials Item Task Description b* I c# I Ir-~.-r------------------------------------.\I~

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES*401. tJllf R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

T T

E

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

\

N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number
2. of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, tElchnical specifications, and major transients.

S I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number M and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using L at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated A from the applicants' audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

T o c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plelnt tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form

/

T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s}

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form

b. Verify that the aciministrative outline meets the criteria spec:ified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

G

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

E N c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

L

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

P~inted Name £"S!.!ln.atur~

a. Author Grea Hoek / ;t'~c~.c
b. Facility Reviewer (*) Joseoh Kulasinskv I ~ V ... ~ ella/fl'
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor NOTE: # Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "e"; chief examiner concurrence required,
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

ES-201, Page 26 0128

ES-201 ExaminatIon Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weekes) of 1/"'1 II/ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware ofthe phYSical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility Iicensee'S procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post.Examjnatlon To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of t/-z.C17t1 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

I'.L1 I1.=

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE I

i

, .. /P<<I< .UVAI'e.4'I bA<r..... C

~~~ k< . . ~.

'~, ~tl~~~

'-K<,.;>

":5'/LCl

&:LL1!';-'t

')1"'< ..-'1  ::"_'-"'11 ~ .* ___ /1 ~ :1ZM~

_=""'-'---=:.J.l~_ _ _ _ _ ,~.I'i'iilfk:jl~ ~ _ q.q-It _ _

',~,~~___

r-'Jr'~-'-~'5i'-

. (;f 4~ ~.'. (",'" , ~.

.~ ~~ _

r1h.Jlli.L~

'ffiJIIf 9-1-1/~_

1.!:J.L

'HZ-I\

~_ _

-- . * . '""' ( q 'I 'I( iflii1!.t__

ES-201, .~ "qe 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknoWledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of gf:t:t/tl as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly diVulge any information about these examinations to any persons v',Iho have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable ifthe individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware ofthe physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of ,I"'rll/ . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE c;m..o

.$12'0 t...o RO

6. "/hI <... --O!S.'R.;....:.u---~---- -~~,..fI.:,%4!If4dl!25-<<'---
7. ~ __~~~~~O~___________~~~~~~____
8. _-D~,.-Q"--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ..B¥~H~~~+--- ~~'...-J.~~~~<.::::L~__
9. __1i~o::..- _______ _~~Qe::.I..!~~~_ _
10. 'V L .lRo
11. , 10r,)I'\ Ies,'\.,. ('v~ -;;-\:...!"",;:!...W"""C-t-:-aVVi--;'t-,,-(;;--T-~,-,/--- --7t=;t~rttt'"......,.--"----
12. &SEd........ s::r.JS 5S,I.'\a1.4C Tc;th~\C 'l'n
13. ~7(;Y\"lKi$;@UkH ~' 5,~;j;'tDll 3ie;/.meNIJtI
14. _ /lA4) _'lJuJV3Z. We..o
15. 1::74-""" ~/t;. --c....::/2......s:0;...d.,L------- -_......c:.7=::a~~==:-__

NOTES: (!) PeA. rE"!. G"" c .....v rJ."2 f' '1!f'"J..! /I ~

ES-201, -- ~qe 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201~3

% Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of'iA!t4 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromiSed.

2. Post=Gymlnatio!)

. To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) offlkk . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE f RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE t SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

~~~d ~ ~~~~"~7~~~t~~~r:::

f~,L'71- co:; .~ lie: ~:£

~ ~ ~t'

~

tit.

~

If"

£9~

h ,

') "hZ/~;-1'.!:E. ,11/"Itv/tl

6. ______________________________________ ________________ ~
7. _________________________________________________________
8. _ _ __
9. _ _ __

1.0,. - .- --- _ _ __

11. _ _ __
12. _ _ __
13. _ _ __
14. _ _ __
15. _ _ __

NOTES: 6f,U. \4I1\~b Rc#10Vr;{J Fli!lIl') AIJ/!£~"'EII,,(} w:n:l/ouT t-IAIIZtJ(i. SEEN AAJY E,w-1C11 %Alf:'tII~"'ATZt>A/

(!J N; It 'rf!'l/P... c,4/ rft-z/r( t'J ." Z CJ ~

ES-201, - ~ge 27 of 28

ES*201 Examination SecurlJY Agreement Fonn ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examlnatlon I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about ihe NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 112"5.. '11 rl, lis of the date of my signature. I agree ihat I wiD not knowingly divulge any infOrmation about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to Instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those apptlcants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination adminislTalion, except 8$ specifically noted below and authonzed by ll'Ie NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator Is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or Indirect feedbac:k). Furthermore. I am aware of the phySical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result In cancellation of the examinations end/or an enforcement action .against me Of the facility Hcensee, I will immediately raporI to faclllty management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Poat-E..ulJllnation To the best of my kno~e, ~~ nat divulge to any unauthorized persons any infonnation concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of =1- If::rom the date that I entered Into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered Il'Iese licensing examinations. except as speciflcally noted below and autholized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOBTITLE/RESPONSIBIU~E(1) DATEg~ DATE NOTE 1~.)~j ~1' f'IAtvo. ~y.t\~t'"

2. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,

- \ (lj)\,( . ~LLA-

3. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
4. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
5. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
6. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
7. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
8. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

9, _ _ _ _ _- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

10.,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ -~------------

11 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

12,'-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

13.,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

14.,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ------------ - - ------

15.:=~-----

NOTES: --

ES-20 1, Page 27 of 28

T/IIt! 201/ .... /

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre..examination I acknowledge !hat I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of fI/1ff - .,hltl as of the date of my signature. I agree that I wID not knowingly dhfulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable ifltle individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of ttle physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of ttle conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the (aciDly licensee. I will Immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, 1 did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weekes) of t61. -i/i/tl . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide perfonnance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITlE f RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE n SIGNA

1. JOSt;eJl 2.

~ A~'tJAU/.;1' I!..Gvl.tl;Jel' ~W~

(/

..t/1JJI'.,4!!.:PU:Z::::::::.....!::::::!::::::::1JL

3. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
4. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
5. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

u.

ll! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

7. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
8. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
9. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

10.,_____________________________________

11 . _ ______________________________________ ----------- -----

12.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

13.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

14.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ -------- ---

15.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ -----------

NOTES: ----------- ----

ES~201, Page 27 of 28

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: AUiJust 2011 _Operating Test Numb!er:.g§lit.

1. GENERAL CRITERIA
a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b. There is no day-Io-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section 0.1.a).
d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
  • initial conditions
  • initiating cues
  • references and tools, including associated procedures
  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
  • operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been rElviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Date

a. Author Greg Hoek g [(1 (V b.

c.

Facility Reviewer (*)

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor

-# 6'L" lc (

{,

NOTE:

  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

s-im--u-la~t-o-r~S-ce-n-a-ri-o-Q-u-al-ity-=C~he-c~k~li~s~t--------~FO-r-m-E-S-*-30-1-*4-ES*301 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: August 2011 Scenario Numbers: 2/3/4 Operating Test Num~1 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c#

I 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event description consists of
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic eve*nt.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. If time compressIon techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

i 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

I All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES*301.

i 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes I 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 6 / 5 / 6 ~ ~ ~

ICi_2_.______M_a_lf_u_nc_t_io_n_S_a_fte_r_E_o_p

__ e_nt_ry_ (_1_-2_)____________________________+-___2__/_1__ ~

/_1____

i 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 / 2 / 3 ~ I~--

4. Major transients (1-2) 1 / 1 I 1 ~ <9 CX\~
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / 1 / 1 # I<=t
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 3 I 2 / 2 ,J$ '1t" C r
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 3 I 2 / 2 .¥IIJ ~ I: ~

ES-301, Page 25 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checldist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: August 2011 Scenario Numbers: 1 / / Operating Test Number: 289-2011-301 Initials QUALITATIVE ATIRIBUTES a b* c#

~I 1, The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of

~I~ If\.

service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events,
3. Each event description consists of
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated 1#

~

  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario 1f l"ly 5.

6.

without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain

'*J#1 fd#J I~ N[(

complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ~ ~/

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

9I;j

~ r-"

Operators have sufficient time to cerry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. I~ I~ ""i!\
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator

~~

performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while runnin'~ the planned scenarios. ~(\

~

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. 't-' {~

11, All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6

~ l 12.

(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). *.~

~

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes -- -

I!

Total malfunctions (5-8) 6 I /

"~

1.

2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 / /
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 / /
4. Major transients (1-2) 1 / / lW 4 1iW
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / /

rs.

7.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)

Critical tasks (2-3) 3 /

2 /

/

I ES-301, Page 25 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: August 2011 Operating Test Number: 289-2011-301 i A E I Scenarios V ---------~--------~I--------~I---------rl~------~II P

I---i P E ----1---~---_-2------r-----3------r_----4----~ T M

~

r 1,_ _

L N CREW CREW! CREW CREW 0 I I T ltroSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION ~

C A T SA B S A B S A B SA B L M N R TOR TOR TOR TO U Y 0 CPO CPO CPO C P MM

~

T

! I I  ; R I I I u ,I RX -----'-1---  ! I 1 1 1 1 1 i 0 I, o0 0 i NOR I 4  ! 1  : 2 I 1 1 i 1 i I SRO-I-1 r------ I!  ! 2,3,4s,5,6, " 115 4

~ ~il_/C_ _-+__~_____I~__~1_,2_,3_,7,_s~__+-__~__ -+_',_2,3_,5-+!___+~~r-__+-__-r__r--r_4-Ti_2~

1 SRO-U MAJ i! 6 I' 1 6! 7 l' 3 2 2"'121 01--- I' T-S-I-----+-I'- -+--+-----+---+----'-1'--"--r---r!----j----t---'-------,~-r--,--2 2

, ,2,5 i 2.4 5 0 ,

RX! i 4 i I I 1 -'--1--+-1-"iQ RO-1 ~"~~--~----r!--~----~'--4----+----4----~--'+----+---'---r-~--r--~i,--o~

~  ! NOR  ! , 1 1 1 1 gO-I-21-- --+- , _.-+- --+-----l-----f--',-3,a-+---I---!----l-!----f---+-----+----+1'-2-,3-,4-1-- , 6 i 4 4 2 1/c I 1

, SRO-U MAJ i I 6! i ! I 7 1 2 : 2 2 1 0

I ' TS i i i  !! 1 i 0 i 0 2 2 I RX i Ii' I' I  ! I ' 1 1 1 0 RO-2

~O-I  ! NOR I i 4 I  ! i 1 i 1 1 I 1 o *I/C, , i ,,23,7 i 1 5,6,8 i 7 i 4 4  ! 2 SRO-U MAJ I i I I I 2 I 2 2 1 o  !

r---+---~---~~---+--~--~--~--4_---+_--+__~--~--,_+__T~1 TS i 6 7 o 0 2 2

II--~I---!R-X--+i--

+-----r-----+--__

iI----+-__ii--..._+-_+___

! -+__r-__+-__+---'~+--+_--li i 1 1 0 1 RO I I i ~

o II___N-O-R-Ti__-+__-+!__-+__-+__-+-I'.,__-I~--4L__- 4_ _-~_ _- ,_ _-+__~-,i-1-+-1-+I'_1~111 gO-I i I/C I ! i i i4 4 2!

M_A_J_ _~__+.__+

i I go-u I-! '; ______+-_--jif---_I-------ir---+i---If-----+I,-r-f----Ti_I---I,_2--+-_2---1_14

, !TS I I i I I 2 2!

Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions, Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATe positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC pOSition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP pOSition, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced With additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-tor-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward Ii the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-S Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: AU~lust 2011 Operating Test Number: 289-2011-301 A E Scenarios 1

P V I 1 2 3 4 T M P

L E

N GREW I GREW I CREW CREW i~ I I T POSITION I POSITION i POSITION POSITION N A I C

S A B S A B S A B S A B L M A

N T

Y R T 0 R T I0 I

R T 0 R I CT 0 U T P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 I P M(*)

I i E i I I R

i f U I I 0 1 I 1 RO i RX i i 0

0 I NOR I 4 4 I 2 1 1 1 SRO-I  !

0  : IIG i 1,2,3,7,8 1,2,3,5,7 I 10 4 4 I 2 SRO-U I MAJ 6 6 I 2 I 2 2 I 1

! f2J ' i I I i TS I 1,2,5 I 1,3 I 5 0 2 I 2

---~

i  ! 1 RO-3 RX 4 i I I 1 1 I 0 I

f2J NOR i

I I i 1 ! 1 1 i

1 I I

~O-I IIIG I I 1,3,8 I 1,2,7 I  ! 6 4 4 2 I I

SRO-U :MAJ  ! 6 6 2 2 I 2 1 'I

0 I I TS i I 0 01 2 i 2 RX  ! 1 I 1 I 0 RO

! i 0 'NOR I 1 1 I 1 SRO-I i I IIC i 4 I 4 2 0  !

,SRO-U MAJ 2 I 2 1 i

0 i  !

TS 0 2 2 I I I

,RX i

! i I 1 1 0 RO 0 NOR  ! 1 1 1 SRO-I IIG 4 4 I 2 0 i I I

I i

SRO-U ;MAJ i  ! 2 2 I 1 I I

'0 ,

ITS I i I 0 2 2 L I Instructions:

1. Gheck the af~licant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event ty~e; are not a~licable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "ba ance-of-plant (8 P)" positions. Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATG positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC

~osition. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIG malfunction can be credited oward the two IIG malfunctions required for the ATG position.

2. Reactivi~ manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section .5.d) but must be significant per Section G.2.a of Appendil< D. P Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced With additional instrument or component mal unctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

, 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions s.hould be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

L ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: August 2011 Operating Test No.: 289-2011-301 I APPLICANTS

~O Competencies I

~

SRO-I-1 SRO-U 0

[g]

0 i RO SRO-I I SRO-U 0

0

[g]

RO SRO-I SRO-U 0

0 0

RO SRO-I SRO-U 0

0 0

SCENARIO Ii SCENARIO I SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 ! 3 4 I 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 I 2 3 I 4 I Interpret! Diagnose Events and Conditions I 1,2,3.4,1 1,2,3.4, 1,2.3.4,

,5,6,7.8, 5,6 ,5,6,7,8, I

i I 11,2,3.4, 1.2,3,4.,

15,6,7,81 5,6,7 I I

I I  !

i Comply With and Use 11 ,2,3,4,1 1 ,2,3,4, I I I

1,2,3.4,11,2,3,4, \ 1,2,3,4, \

5,6,7,8 5,6,7 5,6.7,8 15.6,7,8! 5,6,7  !

, , I I Procedures (1) i I I 1'1~'1I

  • Operate Control I I I I l

' Boards (2) I I I II I  !

I Communicate I I !I , I I I and Interact 1,2,3,4, '1,2,3,4, . 1.2,3.4,.:

5,6,7,8 5.6,7 5,6,7,8 1,2,3,4,: 1,2,3.4, 5,6,7,8! 5,6,7

  • I I I I I I I

~

I I Demonstrate 1,2,3,4, 5,6,7,8 1,2,3,4, 1 5 ,6,7.8 :

i 1,2.3,4, 1,2,3,4, 5,6.7,8 5,6,7 I I I Supervisory Ability (3) I I i I I

Comply With and 1,2,5 I I 2.4 I /1,2,5 1,3 I I I I I

, Use Tech Specs. (3) I I I I i I I Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO, I (2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Examination: August 2011 Op...,.... ,;"l:l APPLICANTS Competencies

  • 1 I I I*

~~:;~!e(~ontrol L~.~.4. i 4 1

II 1 \4.6, i 2,3.4.7

  • 158 6,7 i 1,3846. 12'7 ,6. I I

Ii Communicate i1 ,2.3.4.1 1.23.4,1 ','1,1.2,3,4,: 1,2.3,4, 1.2,3.4, *1

, and Interact 56 5,6.7.8 5,6.7,8 II 1 . ,7,8 I 5,6,7,8 I 5.6.7,8! I i

~'

Demonstrate 1 [I I 1 II

, Supervisory Abil_ity~(3-"-)--+_-+-_+----I._-II--_+--_+_-+-_I'---t-_-+------1c----II-_-r----+_--I-----I1 3~:~~c~~:~: (3) I I LI I  :

Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

for an SRO-U.

mnlir.l=Ih~e II Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

7 f'A{ ()t/e/L~

05-1 NRC 08-1 NRC 10-1 Cert 10-1 NRC JPM "A" Respond to seq fault EB due to multiple stuck New EB 3rd MUP Alt New ATWAS - Alternate path (11.2.05.159 mod) rods. Had to raise letdown flow.

JPM "B" LPI Failure (11.2.05.195) DC-P-1 B trip on ES, alt Post Loca Boron control Respond to PZR level control problem path PTL cooled equip. Alt path JPM"C" Failed Narrow Range pressure Vent the PZR to the Drain ESAS HPI MU-V-14A fails to Transfer ESAS to RB sump recirc Alt (TO-TM-1 04-220-J001) Tank open Alt path JPM "0" Seal Failure, ALT path gets Shift EFW pump suctions ~oss of operating DHR train Restore ADV's TBV's to ICS Auto worse, MAP - AOP - Trip rx and loumo.

JPM "E" Cr~s~COhr1NiA-SR Art' ~~h Initiate RB Spray EOP-001 Turbine Valves fail to Initiate RB Cooling Alt path close Alt JPM "F" Return RB cooling to stnby Energize 1E from SBO alt Init RB spray BWST >6.3 <9.5 Restore "0" bus from SBO ops (from 2003 NRC) path no cooling water BS-V~1 DH-V-5A cl JPM "Gil Operate SBO ALT path (Freq Initiate and Isolate RB Transfer BOP Busses RM-A-1 Hi new ALT path low) Purge

..... (

JPM "H" RM-A-1 Hi ALT path Shifting DHR train Operate Start up RPS Channel Cross-con~ SRl~ '(' ...

to Stndby I",

JPM "I" Reset EF-P-1 (2003 NRC) Respond to Loss IA IP Alt EFW from F.S. using FS-P-15 Manually Operate MU-V-20 / IC-V-4 Ipath JPM "J" Initate EB (RSD MU-V-51 1B Initiate EB (Repeat) Initate EB (RSD MU-V-511B Purge RM-A-7 ES) ES) ?

JPM "K" Local Manual RR-V-6 Operate MS-V-3C Att 11 contingencies Cooldown Respond to failure EF-P-2A and EF-V outside CR 300 A1-1 RO Determine Demin water for Calc ECB RB Avg Temp calc Verify watch stand reqments new batch add Calc A1-1 SRO Same Review Approve ECB Review and approve water add Verify watch stand reqments new calc "C" RCBT and bamt A1-2 RO Transient RCS LR calc RB Avg Temp calc Calc OPT and 1mb OOC Calc ECP A1-2 SRO Transient RCS LR calc and T.S. Maintain Min Shift manning Approve a faulted OPT and Review and approve ECP application OT (2003 NRC) 1MB.

A2RO 1301-1 DHR drain down mode Station print read 27/86 fail 1301-1 HU EFW section Station* print read 27/26 fai1.REPEAT A2SRO Evaluate temporary procedure Station print read 27/86 fail Approve a mode change Determine post maintence test change & T.S. call (NEW)

A3RO Given Condition determine and N/A Dose Limit Stay times (RP-M N/A apply Dose Limits (DH-V-12A) 460)

A3SRO Same Failed RM-A-8G during Approve Dose> 5 Rem Review RB Survey log release A4RO N/A ERO notification Alt path N/A ERO notification Different Alt path A4SRO EAUPAR FS-1 EAL MA2 EAL TBD EAL MU4 Scenario 1 100% - Steam Leak, EOP-004 Not used. Apprch to crit - premature crit 85%- NI5 failure continous rod withdraw - OTSG Loss VBA tube rupture (08-1 Cert # 5) RCS leak containment LOCA ESAS failure I Scenario 2 S/U - premature crit cant rod 85% - lower power to 85% - lower power to remove 100%

with - tube ruptue rem ove FW P - FW -V's fail FWP - FW-V's fail to respond MU-P-1 B trip / AOP-41 (See 08-1 Cert #5) to respond auto - dropped auto - dropped rod - RCS leak, Loss 8 bus rod - RCS leak, LOFW LOFW LOCA Modify this (last PZR level trans fail LOCA NRC) Loss FWP Stuck rod LOOP EFW failure Scenario 3 85% - stuck rod - RCP high vibs 100% - Aux Transformer 100% - MU-V-32 fails - Seal fail 100%

- re-ratio fail - LSCM fault - Steam Leak - FW - re-ratio fail - Rx Trip - OTSG Inadv ESAS isolation failure - stuck rods tube rupture Modify this OTSG Tube leak NRC) Loss ICCW Tube rupture ADV to B/U loader Scenario 4 5% Stu RC3A fail High 5% S/U FW P trips - A TWAS - loss SR-P-1 B trip EFW LosslA Steam leak PORV fail open Uncontrolled rod motion Excessive cooling Scenario 5 100% - MU-V-32 fails Seal fail - re-ratio fail Rx Trip - OTSG tube rupture

ES-401 Written examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-8 Facility: Three Mile Island Date of Exam: August 2011 Exam Level: RO I8J SAO I8J Item Oescrlption

4. The S8fr4)1ing process was random and systemallc (If more than 4 RO or 2 SAO quesIions were repaaled from the last 2 NRC lICensing exam, consult the NRR OL progralTl office).
5. QuestIon duplicallon from the license saeening/audil exam was controlled as Indicated below (check the Item \hal appIIe8) and appears 8IlPfopriale:

_ the audIl exam was systen18tIcaIIy and randomty developed; IX

_ the audit exam was completed before the licenSe exam was started; or

_ the examinarJons were developed Independently; IX K. the licensee ceftIfIes that there is no dupl'1C8flon; IX

_ other (explain)

6. Bank use mee1S limits (no more than 75 percent from the at least 10 percent new, and the rest enter the aCUIaI RO I SAO-only at right.
7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam are written at the comptehensIon JanaIy8I$level; the SAO exam may exceed 60 percent If the I'8I1domIy selected KAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter 33/7 42/18 the actual RO I SAO question dlslrlbullon(s) at right.
8. ReferenoeS/handOUtS provided do not give away answers or aid In the elimination of dlstractors.
9. Question conlant confOIms with specific t<JA statements In the previOuSly approved examination outline and Is appropriate for the TIer to whlctl they are assigned; deviations are justitled
11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, muI1Iple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Date
s. Author 8123111 I
b. FaciUty Reviewer M I
c. NRC Chief ExamIner II) ~ 1/
d. NRC Regional SupeNisor 2! "

Note: " The faCility reviewer's initialS/Signature are not applicable for NRI~lwelioplra Glwninations.

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial Items in Column *c"; chief examiner reqUired.

ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist IFacility: Three Mile Island Unit 1 Date of Exam: 9/7/11 Exam Level:

Initials Item Description a

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

. 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors I~ '+-II............

(reviewers S ot check> 25% of examinations

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, ~

as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades II/A are 'ustified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity JtQ;I;1 of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader ~~. J? 9'~ 'lh/I/
b. Facility Reviewer(*) =<C5JJ=:t.~~~"~l.)~.~LC:~-:::I.:-::::;:::;::~~~__ q\'"'l t \
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) To I-hv fl~

~~--~~----~~~~r,~--~

0

~

d. I\IRC Supervisor (*) ~JE.~A) 'tIM/If

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML113350223&oldid=2465119"