Text

3 Initial Exam 2009-301 Final Administrative Documents
	ML093270191
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	11/18/2009
From:	; Division of Nuclear Materials Safety II
To:	; Progress Energy Co
References
	50-302/09-301
	Download: ML093270191 (97)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Fonn ES-201-1 8/31-Facility: Crystal River 2009-301 Date of Examination: 9/18/2009 Examinations Developed by: Facility Written 1 Operating Test Target Chief Date

TilSk Description (Reference)

Examiner's .. Initials i -180 1. Examination administration date confmned (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 3/26/2009 -120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e) 05/04/2009 -120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 3/26/2009 -120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 05/04/2009 [-90] [5. Reference material due (C. I.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] NIA {-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as 06/17/2009 applicable (C.l.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 6/23/2009 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, 07/22/2009 ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) '. , '; -30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C. 1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) 07/31/2009 -14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-20 1-4 prepared (C. I.!; C.2.i; ES-202) 08/10/2009 -14 1l. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 08/10/2009 (C.2.h; C.3.f) -14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.l.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) 08/10/2009 -7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor 8117/2009 (C.2.i; C.3.h) -7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if> 10) applications audited to confmn qualifications 1 eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent 8/1712009 (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) -7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 8/17/2009 (C.3.k) -7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to 8117/2009 NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are generally based on fitcility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 8/31-Facility: Crystal River 2009-301 Date of Examination: 9/18/2009 Examinations Developed by: Facility Written I Operating Test Target Chief Date

TflSk Description (Reference)

Examiner's Initials -180 l. Examination administration date confIrmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 3/26/2009 -120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 05/04/2009 -120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 3/26/2009 -120 4. Corporate notifIcation letter sent (C.2.d) 05/04/2009 [-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] NIA {-75 } 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as 06/17/2009 applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 6/23/2009 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, 07/22/2009 ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) , .. -30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202) 07/3112009 -14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-20 1-4 prepared (C. 1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) 08110/2009 -14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 08/10/2009 (C.2.h; C.3.f) -14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.fand h; C.3.g) 08/10/2009 -7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor 811712009 (C.2.i; C.3.h) -7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if> 10) applications audited to confIrm qualifIcations I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent 8/17/2009 (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) -7 15. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 8/17/2009 (C.3.k) -7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to 8/17/2009 NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identifIed in the corporate notifIcation letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. ,( ". C l ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Fonn ES-201-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 08/31109 thru 09/21/09 Item l. W R I T T E N 2. S I M U L A T o R 3. W / T 4. G E N E R A L a. Author a. b. c. d. a. b. c. a. b. c. a. b. c. d. e. f. Task Description VerifY that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 ofES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. Using Form ES-301-5, verifY that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. VerifY that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria of Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 : (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO) Alan Kennedy b. Facility Reviewer (*) Floyd Lawrence 11Uf" c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) d. NRC Supervisor I C./ Initials a b* # AK 4-1 14 AK AK AK AK l{ u AK AK AK AK AK AK AK AK (fl. AK AK Iff AK Date 06110109 06/11109 Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines Page 1 of 1 F:\NRC -2009\Forms\Form ES-201-2 (Outline Quality Checklist)

NRC 2009 Rev O.docx ES-201 f ( ( ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 I Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/21109 Item 1. W R I T T E N 2. S I M U L A T o R 3. W I T 4. G E N E R A L a. Author a. b. c. d. a. b. c. Task Description Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.I of ES-40 I and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria of Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks b. c. a. b. c. d. e. f. distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the fonn (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit teste s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fonn (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Fonn ES-301-1: (I) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO) Alan Kennedy b. Facility Reviewer (*) c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) d. NRC Supervisor Initials a b* .c# AK .4-/ IJ AK 4J P AK 4{ <] AK 41 t AK f{ AK If( M , i AK /,i It r" i

a ,,1 AK 1t t AK 41 $ AK 41 If AK .£ AK .41; "! AK :1I AK If AK /ff I AK /fl Date 06110109 06111/09 I DO/Z!;' /t) 1 Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines Page 1 of I F:\NRC -2009\Forms\Form ES-201-2 (Outline Quality Checklist)

NRC 2009 Rev O.docx ES-201 CRY 5TftL 1l.{lA;iC. -3 ZOO<t-30l ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY DATE 1. Alan Kennedy RE(2) Instructor 1 Facility Author\ 01/29/09 2. TRue. J)UDIfI'r Sr14UL.IH",,/t '1./10/01 . ----------------

3. L,

4. (]cotlbe,

5.

fL Cr.f'b l"r '5 liN C-I /II Ii,o[ re ,L. c OJ .. "" ,

all . '0 J:IJ / .$( /l/vc, &/'5 /M5'?l< , S r IJ<:.; r Of; (4/ ) fA.. 6. Floyd [r,..vJt&. (l 6-:c-r a9 tf/n/q

'b'f-'1a

8. Gdd*e NOTES: .Jt C6J.>([/lrJ

"",at... t;{tlli'1 ir 'fL! IO/'/tn 1( lOrda') 200Cf-30l ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201.-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21109 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE 1.

2. /1. Lee L>L S/"" 0"v f f'r f oi/. 71o'J 3. &.Mt s RV ' J/23/r!L 4. I?oberf ;(3cL/N 5.t:("nesT,i.c-E2-

-,rgJ../fJ ,'-, v' __

6.

{!"N'b £:'2.0., :b Cft-z.li 7/tcli1lltJ #7

8./frdi£

/'/"r/' #:Lot NOTES: -r C---__ IL.:. "ir ew t i V \ A

I q !;;"fi! C/f-/O -1( q ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1.

2. l< d::-O1e.J&A..

3.:JR R %fe.=\ JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY -::>\.. * .:'\ \.A <;;Jv f1 v 0" DATE DATE NOTE 'i .'Uo-6l tr "( " __ 4. /VJAf VA-! =':.& ' 5e:::t' $ 6. K?Il . I

7. (,.JJ t r Q""'-A-s::lA-/"f 5 ----.* ""'P=V'1 --J tJUI1 tJ /' ft1I ey

/0 t; ."'" , 6' fr j 8. "* VI'A-dN' 0/.sojOlJ 7{ ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY DATE DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME 1. .,

'O...FJ--rr----it-+---

2. tleL vYle-lb S:Jv N

.... 3.JR R ___ O_\_/'v'-______

:;,-:--:r---r--r-

4. fJAak (JAW .5 iL{;, 7/'6 5*1,'4 t4. Cf$

6.

K?J.l

7. !'v. I t I Qw.. A-Krt.k!S /6fS I . -, -_D

8. JOUI/I V

>;1} /00 NOTES: "* y,'4 07.kJ/oq 1f; ?}I.xIb'j

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY

1. 2oAlA-r..,{j' (l!tilt..

.5h:tJ MCtf/('ifP' tIICt-t:.-t-vI

2.

fJ4st\g= "Tc Gf( 5 leI

3.

J. HOd}? 1l£ OJ>eOtliav l1P1tttljRr . SrvT-{ I tAlc /D 6, e-J Hc/(j'L--- C{JO / D 7, V. Lle'-'-6/(':(IJ , .. de", c.-fvr 8,ljr, q V\ "Dg, ... V\ 11\ ... v I V\ -\-ev NOTES: (l) b:> t.lF' 9. a. << ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. 8.l)Y " &\ V\ "De\.'" '" IA", v NOTES: (0 to 0lF' qa.? ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s} of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC 1e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator ill acceptable if the individual does not select the training or provide direct or indirect feedback}. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s} of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) (2) DATfO A I . , 69 o 9ccj' 2. 3.Sa.trff-.. k-5(.0 Xk\s-kv-c.Ao("" 4. Aitu\ S4t; Ik

5. 5tf\d (;..J-O(r 9f.b "J.hr.J-l'l4( Jcr je7V"" ' 6. _ f/3!}m2 ..:<ids >ss gblI.fl 1/ fi-n l, Iii f\ 4 ..... 7fZ1lQllJ.

tp 7. Lend ( But H, s .. ---... -.. _----..-------ft- .. --fT------=-...:.....;;.... VNt -('t:1/'b1/u, ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC .(e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator acceptable if the individual does not select the training or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 3to JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY S 'It a . ..:;r SIGNATURE (1) ______ ________________________________ Ai.. 'lk 4. ;;>'C-Vt{

5. 2"+

(;,.}-"lr , 0; 01

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., 9cting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or

provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE 1 tjt1/c. &tl.f8'il . ef3Lk, /, '" e-* 3.L.JlOQ '1*,3*9 ........ ItC>¥YrlA" , 4. SfCIl/'en 6tlil. gO. .4 9-./ ... 2 ! 5. 'B.L1,SJ/ber

6. ':S t t-'76Y1t1 ql f/1./ "'1=, _ 7 1';\'1\othy M. },AQ.{'01;"'<bj

\\\Uc. Ops q{iO{O'# . . I I 4' ,. I I It 8. I-/u.&c£ff.. sg., r;..r k,{M-SAG-6R- _ NOTES: i I;Pr -( 1/u/o1 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., ?cting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or

provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE 1. /0, /(G,f:1U 8£{ i,A 01--$ 2_ & .,,, ... , 4. SfC{llte(l 6t-rb /2..0 ...d 9-.l-2 __

5. 'j).L1,SJ/6e,

6. l t-'76N\ q( f/ i

7.

M. \\\uc Syeou\ q {iol D<'1+----+-_-R-I--+'--I--+-___¥_

8. Joo->A-n+A10 6t+1 r:-r NOTES: it (!tft-J iP I <JV\

-< 1/25/01 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and .authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth oPEtrator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1.

Ie YI ft c ,..J SRoD,r-<3L+ L 9-/7-o i 2. _________________________________________

_ 3. _________________________________________ _ 4. _________________________________________ _ 5. __________________________________________ _ 6. _______________________________________ _ 7. ___________________________________________ _ 8. _____________ _ NOTES: ------------'k (?v\.. IDhh 7t\ .-ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and ,authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not.select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1.&Jt.J.tHJ KeTlfl2,-J JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE ____ .. = __ L"""'"----9 0 1---------+--

2. ____________________________________________________

_ 3. ____________________________________________________ _ 4. ____________________________________________________ _ 5. ____________________________________________________ _ 6. ____________________________________________________ _ 7. ____________________________________________________ _ 8. :-:::-:::-=- __________________________________________________ _ NOTES: ) tAA-ID/'h 7t\ lo/,1c1 .-, ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post*Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1. Alan Kennedy Instructor / Facility Author\' 01/29/09 ___ _ 2. J)UOlllt S rI4UL1f relit GAl"..];' ,vGGt? zj 10/0 '1

3. L K(JSt:

1i,rJC'-Ir//i,f i\ OMO-Oq ___ _ 4 t11.f'1:,,#! S( AI..-<-0/:5 /1<i5;r,< 0/2 vJ02 __ 5. ,JPI"'.cv !Z Crt'b S r )Jv r Of; (v) (A. lit{ Y If 7/rf/ __ 6. [toyd (l 'Sul!Vv 6:r::T' 8. Gdd-e NOTES: '-,t,(D.. _ r!n!tt __ <\ '-=d 7£ '7Y "* C6].)([/l1J tAJ;-{.k 6]t(U7 lief<. ()OJ378f& Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1. Alan Kennedy _..:..;In..:.;s::,.:-.t,-,,ru,,,,c,,,,to,,,,,r...:..I...:..F.,.o:a:..;:,:c.:.:.:ilic:Jty,,,,,A,-=ut,,,,,h,,;;:.o.:..-r\'-.-, ____ __ 01/29/09 ____________ _ 2. J)UDIII;- 10/0_' _________ _ 3. f?eg;z 'f L f( () 5 <) !iN (-/ N' Ii /£ rZ ___________ _ 4. (J&,1Ibf-;t1.11711( .$( /live.. cyS /M57i< '5/'0"-,--------

5.

t2 C',r.,r b {f'r -""7'7ri-A---L...-.--- y If 71v.:::.-tf11-- ________ _ 6. [(oy) 'Sul!v. 61:7"' 1/17/'1 _______ _ 7 4v" Y'"""-+. __ -\-'t--___ _ 8. Gdci-e ___ ___ -L--'f -;;... ? NOTES: '* b t I ([YA-f\\ Sf! +..,) I'A-' ak cfJ talZ , lief<. 00)3781& ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES*201*3 1. Pre*Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post*Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY J;l SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1. WJ\) k'4Jb ----2. fj, LI 'afza S/';?1, + thUoi ----3. Maw sRo sb/cq ----l 4. 2be-rf '20LI-v &11; H1I1 be:", fJG/Z "..;:g).) fJ siZe/til ---- Le e..-___ Clue.'? ;J..Oft,I<.yOq r 1 ----6. C-N" £".7.0 * , 7:ltVtMJtJ; t&tM b'we-r --... A:''

/1"'/ -Yo/'ot __ NOTES: ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1.

2. l(c.L JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE DATE N (J1;<JYI,n-p:

3. ___ _ 4. ___ _ 5. ___ _ 6. ___ _ 7. ___ _ 8. __ ____ _ NOTES: -----------

Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1.

2. ?( c.-L JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY

'5,\" \ LA. t..6c;:JL SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE DATE

_--=S"--'.....:N:.....;f1'--'-.---..J(}1L.:...L-"D"-'",c........,...-ff-y-'---_ .;-6-*1------- ___ _ 3. _______________________________________________________________________ _ 4. _________________________________________________________________________________ _ 5. ________________________________________________________________________________ _ 6. ______________________________________________________________________________ _ 7. _________________________________________________________________________ _ 8. _________________________________________________________________________________ _ NOTES:

", f'" ""( ;:,,:piA'" UI',,": ' --ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1. Alan Kennedy 2, ])UONtt 3. WJZ'1 Lc R 05t: 4.

11. t1 "'%! 5.

!2 c,'-trb,f'T JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY Instructor 1 Facility Author\ !i;JC-fr/li(£ i\ f F /A 71£"=-/l/v'-C)j15 /M.577< , S r /'Jv r af; (v' ) (!A... 6. flDyd LAv.J'h-t ({ Q-:c-r __ _ DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 01/29/09 z/lo/01 OUO-td:! :5;!0'l Y 1'7dft 'I/l7l1 ( .. q '-.:d DOS? 8. Gdd-e .Ac-L :Z:Jri "0 ':t B,..? NOTES; -* tmt4d 1/(( 0033181& ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1. Alan Kennedy _.,;..:In-.:.;:s'tr:..;:u:...::c=tor-'-I-'-F..=a=c.:..:..:ili.=.,,tY'-'A...o.u=.;t'h'o'-r\'--- __ 01/29/09 ____________ _ 2. ])UDllltt

3. PfgJZ "I L R. () 5 c '5 nYl v<-L-I>Cf-(JK

/iN C-f r/ Ii r£ i\ ___________ _ 4. GoIIGi-;11.1"7'$'1( $. /l/v'- /tU57l< '3/'0"---------

5.

r !2 ere b (f'r _(_v_)_f._fA...._ y /17 dft...::...+------- ___ _ 6. Floyd LAvJ%<.! 5"u[1V. 6-z:-r '1/n{1 _______ _ ____ _ 8. Gdd-e --'-C!aS--=-'---- ____ B,..? NOTES: -* b;.sCLA55(1) pJ;-.t1--A\ 11(( 003318/& ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY J;J SIGNATURE (2) 1. c...tJD 2. fj . L, S'I"IY) , 0",;lf't f SRQ &:zk 4. -;(3oL/,J EfI:-'ffl1 'U(/ -;g M fJ DATE NOTE ----..L... ______________ __ _ f--------------- ---L..-___________ _____ _ <L CIVO 2 0 1tt<yCPCI' 7 -/------------

6.

&v6 £:2. *. , 7iidtMJ(}; ___ fMM blfMk-t

= s.Ardi?.£7

/"/'

-NOTES: -ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME 1.

2. lcc.k-O1eAb JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY "5\.. * .:."\ LA A.6o'i::..L

<;;Jv N YYlA'J'l ..... ;rif v 0\"' .... DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE or * ( " oS' 1-u.J D9, .. ---------------

---4 i'1A.zt< (;ArJ c ". ---1"1 1 __ 5. c;!<.!1: $ ..,...,.,.."". =, " '/. , --6. . K?/l I __ !6f S '--"'V'-=V'1 __ 8. JtJUI/l tJ 7f1/¥ )f/j /00 -,IN '£/ __ NOTES: J ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE -s+v..)o9 SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME 1.

---'T+-+---------------------------

ffL"--L....£,<..------------

---'-----'--------------------------- ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the fa9ility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1. 2oAflw.Jj* (Vi2Ii-.>h;{). (iAC<Wir tCI....:A.J

2. t,.,j; II \'<,-"" f -1< S ".t{" Tc G f( s I Sr

3. aavk5 J, I'km577I I1qQayRr 4 . .E' S:-.r 501tme5 J, JlrbM50Al t!.40 ! D I

__ ________ __ file; == m/¢9 __ 6. ___ _ 7. ___ ___ ______________________ ___ NOTES: ------------

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1. ;2ol'lflrLJj' (1.(121i-..£h;f) (iAC(f;(c,f'4"" [II Cl-ffA-J 2. tv,-(L'(J.-. F -/4 $ (\=4"' J e c., t<. s I sr

3.

J I Mcro? 77I I1PiQtlJlfT 4 . .E. s 5;0ffme6 / \ AbM504 (!d 0 ! D r I c;,1hs-t Cf7 --------Wh

zkdr-------

m/¢9 ------6. __________________________________________

__ -------7. __________________________________________ __ -------8. __________________________________________ __ -------NOTES: ES-301, Rev. 9, Supp. 1 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 08/31109 thru 09118/09 Examination Level: RO cgJ SRO cgJ Operating Test Number: 1 Administrative Topic Type. Describe activity to be performed (See Note) Code* SRO Only -(COl) -Determine actions for primary to Conduct of Operations D,R secondary leakage. KIA -G2.1.25 SR04.2 CP-152 RO & SRO -(C02) -Perform a time to boil 1 core uncovery Conduct of Operations M,R calculation. KIA -G2.1.23 RO 4.3 SRO 4.4 OP-103H RO & SRO -(EC 1) -Perform a monthly NI Imbalance Comparison. KlA-G2.2.12 R03.7 SR04.1 Equipment Control D,R SRO Only -After completing the Imbalance Comparison determine required ITS actions, if any. KIA -G2.2.40 SRO 4. 7 SP-312B RO & SRO -(RC 1) -Calculate the maximum permissible Radiation Control D,M,P, stay time with an Emergency Event in progress. R KIA -G2.3.4 RO 3.2 SRO 3.7 EM-202 RO -(EP1) -Make required notifications using provided State of Florida Notification Message form. Emergency Procedures D, S SRO Only -(EP2) -Determine Emergency Action Level 1 Plan and Protective Action Recommendations. KlA-2.4.43 R03.2 SR03.8 EM-202 Note: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required. (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator or Class(R)oom

Type Codes & Criteria: (D)irect from bank (.::::: 3 for ROs;.:::::

4 for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank 1) (P)revious 2 exams ( .:::::1; randomly selected) Page 1 of 1 HINRC -20091Post Prep WeeklJPMIAdminlNRC 2009 Form ES-30 I -I (JPM Admin Outline) FINAL. docxE S-301 ES-301, Rev. 9, Supp. 1 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09118109 Examination Level: RO [?SJ SRO [?SJ Operating Test Number: 1 Administrative Topic Type. Describe activity to be performed (See Note) Code* SRO Only -(COl) -Determine actions for primary to Conduct of Operations D,R secondary leakage. KIA -G2.l.25 SRO 4.2 CP-152 RO & SRO -(C02) -Perform a time to boil 1 core uncovery Conduct of Operations M,R calculation. KIA -G2.l.23 RO 4.3 SRO 4.4 OP-103H RO & SRO -(EC 1) -Perform a monthly NI Imbalance Comparison. KlA-G2.2.l2 R03.7 SR04.l Equipment Control D,R SRO Only -After completing the Imbalance Comparison determine required ITS actions, if any. KIA -G2.2.40 SRO 4.7 SP-312B RO & SRO -(RC1) -Calculate the maximum permissible Radiation Control D,M,P, stay time with an Emergency Event in progress. R KIA -G2.3.4 RO 3.2 SRO 3.7 EM-202 RO -(EP 1) -Make required notifications using provided State of Florida Notification Message form. Emergency Procedures D, S SRO Only -(EP2) -Determine Emergency Action Level 1 Plan and Protective Action Recommendations. KIA -2.4.43 RO 3.2 SRO 3.8 EM-202 Note: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required. (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator or Class(R)oom

Type Codes & Criteria: (D)irect from bank (.:s 3 for ROs;.:s 4 for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (2: 1) (P)revious 2 exams ( :Sl; randomly selected)

Page 1 of 1HINRC -20091Post Prep WeeklJPMIAdminlNRC 2009 Form ES-301-1 (JPM Admin Outline) FINAL.docxES-301 ES-301, Rev. 9, Supp. 1 Control Room 1 In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 08/31109 thru 09/18/09 Exam Level: RO [8J SRO-I [8J SRO-U [8J Operating Test Number: 1 Control Room systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF) System I JPM Title Type Safety Code* Function a. CA -Perform an RCS Boration [SRO-U] A,D,S 1 KIA -024AA2.04 RO 3.4 SRO 4.2 (EOP-2) [RO,SRO-I]

b. cvcs -Restore PZR level during OTSG tube rupture [SRO-U] A,D,P,S 2 KIA -006A4.02 RO 4.0 SRO 3.8 (EOP-6) [RO. SRO-I] c. RCS -Respond to a stuck open PZR spray valve A,D,L,P, 3 KIA -002A4.01 RO 4.2 SRO 4.4 (AP-520) [RO, SRO-I] S d. S/GS -Establish EFW flow to raise OTSG level D.S 4 KlA-E03EA1.3 R03.6 SR03.8 (EOP-3) [RO. SRO-I] Primary e. MSS -Perform actions for a stuck open MSSV D,P,S 4 KIA -039A2.04 RO 3.4 SRO 3.7 (EOP-2) [RO. SRO-I] Secondary

f. CCS -Ensure proper alignment of ES equipment

[SRO-U] A,EN,N, S 5 KIA -022A4.01 RO 3.6 SRO 3.6 (EOP-2) [RO. SRO-I] g. AC -Energize a dead bus D,S 6 KIA -062A2.05 RO 2.9 SRO 3.3 (AP-770) [RO] h. ES -Respond to an invalid ES Actuation A,D,EN,S 8 KlA-008A3.08 R03.6 SR03.7 (AP-340) [RO, SRO-I] SPARE MU -Restart a MOP following an RCS leak isolation D,S 2 KIA -002A2.01 RO 4.3 SRO 4.4 (AP-520) In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-L' 3 or 2 for SRO-U) 1. PPcs -Depressurize the RCS using HP Aux. Spray D,E,R 3 KlA-E14EAl.1 R03.8 SR03.6 (EOP-14,Enc.13) [RO. SRO-I] j. DHR -Establish DHR from outside control room [SRO-U] E,L,N,R 4 KIA -A06AAl.1 RO 4.3 SRO 4.2 (AP-990) [RO, SRO-Il Primary k. AC -Transfer vital bus to normal power supply [SRO-UJ D 6 KlA-062A3.04 R02.7 SR02.9 (OP-703) [RO, SRO-I] SPARE FS/OTSG -Transfer excess secondary inventory to FST D,E 3,8 KIA -038EK3.06 RO 4.2 SRO 4.5 (EOP-14, Enc. 9) All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety @ functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Type Codes Criteria for RO I SRO-I I SRO-U (A)ltemate path 4-6 14-6 I 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant ?: II?: II?: 1 (EN)gineered safety feature (control room system) I?:l (L )ow Power I Shutdown ?:1I?:1I?:1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) ?:2/?:2/?:1 (P)revious 2 exams (R)CA (randomly selected)

?:1I?:1I?:1 (S)imulator Page 1 of IH:\NRC -2009\Post Prep Week\JPM\Plant\NRC 2009 Form ES-301-2 (JPM MCR-Plant Outline) FINAL.docx ES-30 1 ES-301, Rev. 9, Supp. 1 Control Room 1 In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: 08/31109 thru 09118/09 Exam Level: RO SRO-I SRO-U Operating Test Number: 1 Control Room systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-J; 2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF) System I JPM Title Type Safety Code* Function a. CA -Perform an RCS Boration ISRO-Uj A,D,S 1 KIA -024AA2.04 RO 3.4 SRO 4.2 (EOP-2) IRO, SRO-Ij b. CVCS -Restore PZR level during OTSG tube rupture ISRO-Uj A,D,P,S 2 KIA -006A4.02 RO 4.0 SRO 3.8 (EOP-6) [RO. SRO-Ij c. RCS -Respond to a stuck open PZR spray valve A,D,L,P, 3 KIA -002A4.01 RO 4.2 SRO 4.4 (AP-520) [RO, SRO-Ij S d. S/GS -Establish EFW flow to raise OTSG level D.S 4 KlA-E03EA1.3 R03.6 SR03.8 (EOP-3) IRO. SRO-Ij Primary e. MSS -Perform actions for a stuck open MSSV D,P,S 4 KIA -039A2.04 RO 3.4 SRO 3.7 (EOP-2) [RO. SRO-Ij Secondary

f. CCS -Ensure proper alignment of ES equipment

[SRO-Uj A,EN,N, S 5 KIA -022A4.01 RO 3.6 SRO 3.6 (EOP-2) [RO. SRO-Ij g. AC -Energize a dead bus D,S 6 KIA -062A2.05 RO 2.9 SRO 3.3 (AP-770) [ROj h. ES -Respond to an invalid ES Actuation A,D,EN, S 8 KIA -008A3.08 RO 3.6 SRO 3.7 (AP-340) [RO, SRO-Ij SPARE MU -Restart a MUP following an RCS leak isolation D, S 2 KIA -002A2.0 1 RO 4.3 SRO 4.4 (AP-520) In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) i. PPcs -Depressurize the RCS using HP Aux. Spray D,E,R 3 KlA-E14EA1.1 R03.8 SR03.6 (EOP-14,Enc.13) IRO. SRO-Ij j. DHR -Establish DHR from outside control room [SRO-Uj E,L,N,R 4 KIA -A06AA 1.1 RO 4.3 SRO 4.2 (AP-990) [RO,SRO-Il Primary k. AC -Transfer vital bus to normal power supply [SRO-Uj D 6 KIA -062A3.04 RO 2.7 SRO 2.9 (OP-703) IRO,SRO-I] SPARE FS/OTSG -Transfer excess secondary inventory to FST D,E 3,8 KIA -038EK3.06 RO 4.2 SRO 4.5 (EOP-14, Enc. 9) All RO and SRO-I control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety @ functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

Type Codes Criteria for RO I SRO-I I SRO-U (A)ltemate path 4-6 14-6 12-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank .::;9/.::;8/.::;4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant ;::11;::11;::1 (EN)gineered safety feature (control room system) -I -I;:: 1 (L )ow Power I Shutdown ;::11;::11;::1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) ;::2/;::2/;::1 (P)revious 2 exams '::;3/'::;3/'::;2 (R)CA (randomly selected)

11;

:11;::1 (S)imulator Page 1 of IHINRC -20091Post Prep WeeklJPMlPlantlNRC 2009 Form ES-30 1-2 (JPM MCR-Plant Outline) FINAL.docx ES-30 1

( ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Crystal River Unit 3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/21/09 Operating Test No: 1 1. General Criteria a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. a. 2. Walk-Through Criteria Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions
initiating cues
references and tools, including associated procedures
reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee
operationally important specific performance criteria that include: -detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

-system response and other examiner cues -statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant -criteria for successful completion of the task -identification of critical steps and their associated peiformance standards -restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Initials A S* 'Jf AK FL \ AK FL AK FL '.",' G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 ;2 007 (BW/E02 & EI0) 007EA2.02 -Ability to determine or interpret the following as they apply to a Reactor Trip -Stabilization X reactor trip: Proper actions to be taken if 4.3 1 -Recovery -1 the automatic safety functions have not taken place 00SAG2.1.23 -Ability to perform OOS Pressurizer Vapor Space X specific system and integrated plant 4.3 1 Accident 1 3 procedures during all modes of plant operation. 009EK2.03 -Knowledge of the 009 Small Break LOCA 1 3 X interrelations between the small break 3.0 1 LOCA and the S/Gs. 011EK3.07 -Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 011 Large Break LOCA 1 3 X to the Large Break LOCA: Stopping 3.5 1 HPI bypass flow (recirdlow OK per GL) 015/017 AKl.05 -Knowledge of the ;, operational implications of the following i concepts as they apply to RCP 015117 RCP Malfunctions 14 X I**.* malfunction (Loss ofRC Flow): Effects 2.7 1 of unbalanced RCS flow on in-core average temperature, core imbalance, and quadrant power tilt. 022AKl.03 -Knowledge of the 022 Loss ofRx Coolant operational implications of the following Makeup 1 2 X concepts as they apply to Loss of 3.0 1 Reactor Coolant Makeup: Relationship between makeup flow and PZR level 025AA2.01 -Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to 025 Loss ofRHR System 14 X the Loss of Decay Heat Removal 2.7 1 System: Proper amperage of running LPI/decay heat removallRHR pump(s) Page 2 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I K K K KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 ..... . , I .*..*. 026AK3.02 -Knowledge of the reasons .... I '{i Ii for the following responses as they apply 026 Loss of Component I ...** 1< *.......* to the Loss of Nuclear Services 1 Decay Cooling Water 18 X :.,'" I Heat Closed Cycle Cooling: The 3.6 1 I *. automatic actions (alignments) within the SWS 1 DCS resulting from the ,.,> ..... actuation of the ESF AS 027AK3.04 -Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 027 PZR Pressure Control X ../ ........................*

to the PZR Pressure Control 2.8 1 System Malfunction 1 3 1

.,. monitor the following as they apply to X the Loss of Main Feedwater (MFW): 4.5 1 14 ii/; EFW controls, including the use of ".< .... , alternate EFW sources it;' ( **** } i' ** .. !.>: 055EK3.02 -Knowledge of the reasons .'.<,':' for the following responses as they apply 055 Station Blackout 16 X to the Station Blackout: Actions 4.3 1 ........*.
contained in EOP for loss of offsite and ..... .. 0';*'< onsite power . .........
h;\; 056AAl.05 -Ability to operate and 1 or 056 Loss of Off site Power 1 X monitor the following as they apply to 3.8 1 6 ..*.****. '. " the Loss of Offsite Power: Initiation .* r (manual) of safety injection process Page 3 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 11 Group 1 E/APE # I Name I K K K A '1 ',\." Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 G KIA Topic(s) IR # 026AK3.02 -Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 026 Loss of Component to the Loss of Nuclear Services 1 Decay X Heat Closed Cycle Cooling: The 3.6 1 Cooling Water 1 8 automatic actions (alignments) within , the SWS 1 DCS resulting from the < actuation of the ESF AS "'1:* 027AK3.04 -Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply 027 PZR Pressure Control X to the PZR Pressure Control 2.8 1 System Malfunction 1 3 Malfunctions: Why, if PZR level is lost and then restored, that pressure recovers much more slowly. 029EA1.l2 -Ability to operate and 029 ATWS 11 X monitor the following as they apply to an 4.1 1 ATWS: Reactor trip breakers 038 Steam Generator Tube 038EG2.1.28 -Knowledge of the Rupture 13 X purpose and function of major system 4.1 1 components and controls. 040 (BW/E05) Steam Line Rupture -Excessive Heat Transfer 14 054AA1.Ol -Ability to operate and lor 054 Loss of Main Feedwater monitor the following as they apply to 14 X the Loss of Main Feedwater (MFW): 4.5 1 ;, > EFW controls, including the use of . alternate EFW sources 055EK3.02 -Knowledge of the reasons .; for the following responses as they apply 055 Station Blackout 1 6 X to the Station Blackout: Actions 4.3 1 '.' .' contained in EOP for loss of offsite and onsite power. 056AAl.05 -Ability to operate and lor 056 Loss of Off site Power 1 X monitor the following as they apply to 3.8 1 6 the Loss of Offsite Power: Initiation (manual) of safety injection process Page 3 of 140:\Cl)1stai River Examinations\Initiai Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I K K K A .. iA: 1i'6,j KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2* .... . ... 057 Loss of Vital AC Instrument Bus / 6 .... ./ I*'" Ii. 058AKl.Ol -Knowledge of the operational implications of the following 058 Loss of DC Power 16 X I** .* , .... concepts as they apply to Loss of DC 2.8 1 .. Power: Battery charger equipment and instrumentation 062 Loss of Nuclear Services Water 1 4 .. .. 065 Loss ofInstrument Air 1 065AG2.4.8 -Knowledge of how 8 X abnormal operating procedures are used 3.8 1 in conjunction with EOPs. BW/E04EA2.1 -Ability to determine BW/E04 Inadequate Heat I;. and interpret the following as they apply Transfer -Loss of ,. .*.i to the (Inadequate Heat Transfer): 3.2 1 Secondary Heat Sink 1 4 li< Facility conditions and selection of Ii appropriate procedures during abnormal and emergency operations. 077 AK2.03 -Knowledge of the 077 Generator Voltage and . interrelations between Generator Voltage Electric Grid Disturbances 1 X and Electric Grid disturbances and the 3.0 1 6 I following: Sensors, detectors, ... indicators . .. KIA Category Totals 3 2 4 3 I*.* *.* 3' 3 Group Point Total 18/6 Page 4 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINALdocx ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 1 , E/APE # I Name I K K K A * ** cA , <(jj: KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 ., : 057 Loss of Vital AC Instrument Bus 1 6 058AKl.Ol -Knowledge ofthe operational implications of the following 058 Loss of DC Power 16 X concepts as they apply to Loss of DC 2.8 1 Power: Battery charger equipment and instrumentation 062 Loss of Nuclear Services Water 1 4 065 Loss of Instrument Air 1 065AG2.4.8 -Knowledge of how 8 X abnormal operating procedures are used 3.8 1 in conjunction with EOPs. BW IE04EA2.1 -Ability to determine BW IE04 Inadequate Heat I* I., and interpret the following as they apply Transfer -Loss of I" to the (Inadequate Heat Transfer): 3.2 1 .. Facility conditions and selection of Secondary Heat Sink 1 4 appropriate procedures during abnormal and emergency operations. 077 AK2.03 -Knowledge of the 077 Generator Voltage and ,,' . interrelations between Generator Voltage Electric Grid Disturbances 1 X and Electric Grid disturbances and the 3.0 1 6 following: Sensors, detectors, indicators. " KJ A Category Totals 3 2 4 3 3 3 Group Point Total 18/6 Page 4 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL -WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINALdocx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 ........ / E/APE # I Name I K K K A I ... .,. .**.*.*. ***.. KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 liz*' xii .. * ... * ..* *. / .... OOlAA2.05 -Ability to determine and 001 Continuous Rod > **.*i interpret the following as they apply to i****i.:. the Continuous Rod Withdrawal: 4.4 1 Withdrawal/I
f*j .. Uncontrolled rod withdrawal from ******* available indications

......
003AKl.l0 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the following 003 Dropped Control Rod / 1 X ;( .*...*... concepts as they apply to Dropped 2.6 1 ******************* , .*...*. }. Control Rod: Definitions of core .. quadrant power tilt i.;i ....... iii.:;:' :.i 005AK3.05 -Knowledge of the reasons 005 Inoperable/Stuck Rod / 1 X ...... >. for the following responses as they apply 3.4 1 ii*.* i .* to the Inoperable / Stuck Control Rod: Power limits on rod misalignment 024 Emergency Boration / 1 ::i*i;; I .. ****** 028 PZR Level Malfunction / \ . ..................... ................
....... 2 .... i , 032 Loss of Source Range i ....... I." NIl 7 I**.* ... *.***** ..

I: .... 033 Loss ofIntermediate 1 2\;(:: Range NI /7 Ii. ...* y.: 036 (BW/A08) Fuel Handling Accident / 8 037 Steam Generator Tube Leak/3 051 Loss of Condenser Vacuum/4 ; ..........
........ 059 Accidental Liquid .....? RadWaste ReI. / 9 ; ... ; .*.**. Page 5 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 1 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I K K K A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 001AA2.05 -Ability to determine and 001 Continuous Rod interpret the following as they apply to Withdrawal/ 1 X the Continuous Rod Withdrawal: 4.4 1 Uncontrolled rod withdrawal from . ..... : available indications
003AKl.l0
-Knowledge of the ; operational implications of the following 003 Dropped Control Rod / 1 X concepts as they apply to Dropped 2.6 1 Control Rod: Definitions of core quadrant power tilt 005AK3.05 -Knowledge of the reasons 005 Inoperable/Stuck Rod / 1 X for the following responses as they apply 3.4 1 to the Inoperable / Stuck Control Rod: Power limits on rod misalignment 024 Emergency Boration / 1 ! 028 PZR Level Malfunction / 2 , 032 Loss of Source Range NI/7 033 Loss ofIntermediate Range NI / 7 "1* 036 (BW/A08) Fuel Handling Accident / 8 037 Steam Generator Tube Leak/3 . 051 Loss of Condenser .. Vacuum / 4 059 Accidental Liquid . ....... , . RadWaste ReI. / 9 Page 5 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name / K K K A KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 060 Accidental Gaseous I',j;,), Radwaste ReI. 19 061 ARM System Alarms 17 X 061AG2.2.12 -Knowledge of 3.7 1 surveillance procedures. I. 067 Plant Fire On-site 1 8 ". BW/A06AK1.3 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the following 068 (BW I A06) Control Ij. ",s. concepts as they apply to the (Shutdown X Outside Control Room): Annunciators 3.4 1 Room Evac. 1 8 ' ... , ... and conditions indicating signals, and I. ..* ". remedial actions associated with the L (Shutdown Outside Control Room) . ** ' . ..... 069 Loss of CTMT Integrity . ,.( ,. 15 074EA2.03 -Ability to detennine or .i: 074 Inad. Core Cooling 14 ':X. interpret the following as they apply to a 3.8 1 .. ' Inadequate Core Cooling: Availability of turbine bypass valves for cooldown . ' " . 076 High Reactor Coolant . Activity 19 . . ... .' BW 1 AO 1 Plant Runback 1 1 BW/A02AG2.2.12 -Knowledge of BW/A02&A03 Loss ofNNI-:lC surveillance procedures. (Loss of NNI-3.7 1 XIY 17 ". X while performing an SP OK per ...i i GL) .. BW/A04 Turbine Trip 14 BW 1 A05 Emergency Diesel ,; ii '. Actuation I 6 ' ,'. Page 6 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 1 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I K K K A G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 c, ,! 060 Accidental Gaseous ", I,", Radwaste ReI. I 9 061 ARM System Alarms I 7 I X 061AG2.2.12 -Knowledge of 3.7 1 surveillance procedures. 067 Plant Fire On-site I 8 BW/A06AK1.3 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the following 068 (BW/A06) Control concepts as they apply to the (Shutdown X Outside Control Room): Annunciators 3.4 1 Room Evac. I 8 and conditions indicating signals, and 'L' remedial actions associated with the (Shutdown Outside Control Room). 069 Loss of CTMT Integrity 15 074EA2.03 -Ability to determine or 074 Inad. Core Cooling I 4 X interpret the following as they apply to a 3.8 1 Inadequate Core Cooling: Availability of turbine bypass valves for cooldown 076 High Reactor Coolant Activity I 9 BW I AO 1 Plant Runback I 1 BW/A02AG2.2.12 -Knowledge of BW/A02&A03 Loss ofNNI-X surveillance procedures. (Loss of NNI-3.7 1 XIY I 7 X while performing an SP OK per GL) BW/A04 Turbine Trip 14 ,,: \, , ' BW I A05 Emergency Diesel Actuation I 6 Page 6 of 14o:ICrystal River ExaminationslInitial Exam 2009-3011FINAL -WRITIEN EXAMIRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I Safety Function BW/A07 Flooding 18 BW/E03 Inadequate Subcooling Margin 1 4 BW/E08 LOCA Depress. 14 BW/E09 Natural Circ. 14 BW/E13&El4 EOP Rules and Enclosures KIA Category Totals KKK A 123 1 x x 2 1 1 1 KIA Topic(s) BW/A07AK2.l -Knowledge of the interrelations between the (Flooding) and the following: Components, and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes, and automatic and manual features. BW/E08EAl.l -Ability to operate and 1 or monitor the following as they apply to the (LOCA Cooldown): Components, IR 3.7 and functions of control and safety 4.0 systems, including instrumentation, signals., interlocks, failure modes, and automatic and manual features. Group Point Total Page 7 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 1 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 # 1 1 9/4 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I K K K A ,A: G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 BW/A07AK2.1 -Knowledge of the interrelations between the (Flooding) and the following: Components, and BW/A07 Flooding 18 X functions of control and safety systems, 3.7 1 including instrumentation, signals, I: ..... interlocks, failure modes, and automatic " , and manual features. BW/E03 Inadequate i' Subcooling Margin I 4 .. BW IE08EAl.l -Ability to operate and I or monitor the following as they apply to BW IE08 LOCA Cooldown -the (LOCA Cooldown): Components, X and functions of control and safety 4.0 1 Depress. 14 systems, including instrumentation, signals., interlocks, failure modes, and automatic and manual features. BW IE09 Natural Circ. I 4 BW/E13&E14 EOP Rules and Enclosures KIA Category Totals 2 1 1 1 2 .. 2 Group Point Total 9/4 Page 7 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FIN AL docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 K K K K K K A A A A r; ...** System # / Name Ie KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 .2 3 4 f 003K6.14 -Knowledge of the effect 003 Reactor Coolant X I of a loss or malfunction on the 2.6 1 Pump/4 following will have on the RCPs: Starting Requirements I .. 1: .... : I : 004K2.06 -Knowledge of bus power 004 Chemical and X supplies to the CVCS control 2.6 1 Volume Control / 1 & 2 .'" " instrumentation. X 005K2.01 -Knowledge of bus power 3.0 1 supplies to the DH pumps. 005 Residual Heat Removal/4 005K6.03 -Knowledge of the effect X : of a loss or malfunction on the 2.5 1 following will have on the Decay {" : Heat System: DH heat exchanger I 006K5.04 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the X **** following concepts as they apply to 2.9 1 I*:.' ECCS: Brittle fracture, including . causes and preventative actions I 006 Emergency Core 006A2.10 -Ability to (a) predict the Cooling / 2 & 3 1< impacts of a low boron concentration in the ECCS; and (b) X based on those predictions, use 3.4 1 I procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of this malfunction . . . 007 A4.09 -Ability to manually 007 PZR Relief/Quench
. operate and/or monitor in the control X room: relationships between PZR 2.5 1 Tank/5 '. level and changing levels of the PRT and bleed holdup tank ". 008K4.02 -Knowledge of SWS / 008 Component Cooling dO . DCS design feature(s) and/or X interlock(s) which provide for 2.9 1 Water /8 '" operation of the surge tank, including the associated valves and controls.
It* Page 8 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 System # / Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 003K6.14 -Knowledge of the effect 003 Reactor Coolant X of a loss or malfunction on the 2.6 1 Pump/4 following will have on the RCPs: Starting Requirements
', , 004K2.06 -Knowledge of bus power 004 Chemical and X supplies to the CVCS control 2.6 1 Volume Control / 1 & 2 instrumentation.
X 005K2.01 -Knowledge of bus power 3.0 1 supplies to the DH pumps. 005 Residual Heat Removal / 4 005K6.03 -Knowledge of the effect X , of a loss or malfunction on the 2.5 1 following will have on the Decay Heat System: DH heat exchanger 006K5.04 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the X following concepts as they apply to 2.9 1 ECCS: Brittle fracture, including causes and preventative actions " 006 Emergency Core 006A2.10 -Ability to (a) predict the Cooling / 2 & 3 impacts of a low boron concentration in the ECCS; and (b) X based on those predictions, use 3.4 1 procedures to correct, control, or , mitigate the consequences of this malfunction. 007 A4.09 -Ability to manually 007 PZR Relie£'Quench operate and/or monitor in the control X room: relationships between PZR 2.5 1 Tank/5 level and changing levels of the PR T and bleed holdup tank 008K4.02 -Knowledge of SWS / DCS design feature(s) and/or 008 Component Cooling X interlock(s) which provide for 2.9 1 Water /8 operation of the surge tank, including I the associated valves and controls. Page 8 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 IIFINAL -WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 . System # / Name K K K K K K A KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 008Al.03 -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to Component Cooling prevent exceeding design limits) 2.7 1 ater /8 associated with operating the SWS / DCS controls including: CCW pressure. 010K5.01 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the X following concepts as the apply to 3.5 1 the PZR PCS: Determination of condition of fluid in PZR, using steam tables 012G2.4.6 -Knowledge ofEOP 3.7 1 mitigation strategies. 12 Reactor Protection / 012K5.01 - of the X operational implications of the 3.3 1 following concepts as they apply to the RPS: DNB Q13K2.01 -Knowledge of bus power 13 Engineered Safety X supplies to the ESF AS / safeguards 3.6 1 eatUres Actuation / 2 equipment control. 022K4.01 -Knowledge ofCCS design feature(s) and/or interlock(s) X which provide for the following: 2.5 1 Cooling of reactor building penetrations. 026Al.Ol -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to 6 Containment Spray / . prevent exceeding design limits) 3.9 1 associated with operating the BSS controls including: Reactor Building pressure 039K3.05 -Knowledge of the effect X that a loss or malfunction of the 3.6 1 MRSS will have on the following; RCS Page 9 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\lnitial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL -WRITfEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 , System # / Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 I . 008Al.03 -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to 008 Component Cooling X .' prevent exceeding design limits) 2.7 1 Water /8 1;<**.*. associated with operating the SWS / DCS controls including: CCW , pressure . . , OIOK5.01 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the 010 Pressurizer Pressure X following concepts as the apply to 3.5 1 Control / 3 the PZR PCS: Determination of condition of fluid in PZR, using steam tables , X 012G2.4.6 -Knowledge ofEOP 3.7 1 '. mitigation strategies, 012 Reactor Protection / 7 i OI2K5.01 -Knowledge of the X operational implications of the 3.3 1 following concepts as they apply to the RPS: DNB OI3K2.01 -Knowledge of bus power 013 Engineered Safety X supplies to the ESF AS / safeguards 3.6 1 Features Actuation / 2 equipment control. '. 022K4.0l -Knowledge ofCCS . design feature(s) and/or interlock(s) 022 Containment X which provide for the following: 2.5 1 Cooling /5 Cooling of reactor building penetrations. 026Al.0 1 -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to 026 Containment Spray / X ' prevent exceeding design limits) 3.9 1 5 associated with operating the BSS t*** .' controls including: Reactor Building pressure 039K3.05 -Knowledge of the effect 039 Main and Reheat X that a loss or malfunction of the 3.6 1 Steam / 4 MRSS will have on the following: RCS Page 9 of 14o:\CrystaJ River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 J \FINAL -WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 I Group 1 System # I Name K K K K K K A A A '8 KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 3 4 fi :'ii"* 059A3.04 -Ability to monitor X :/i automatic operation of the MFW, 2.5 1 : .*....... including: Turbine driven feed pump ..*.... 059 Main Feedwater /4 ************* ii 059K3.02 -Knowledge of the effect .... , ...... that a loss or malfunction of the X I**** ..* ***********
.... MFW will have on the following:
3.6 1 ******** :.i{ EFW system .......*.....* i.*.*.*.* i' .........* 061K3.02 -Knowledge of the effect 061 Auxiliary I I' * : .* *.*i ** ***** that a loss or malfunction of the Emergency Feedwater / X Ii:,: EFW will have on the following: 4.2 1 4 1<* 1*<; S/G Il';' '0 062A2.16 -Ability to (a) predict the ........*..
Iii. impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the ........ AC distribution system; and (b) 062 AC Electrical l*i***.***.**
based on those predictions, use 2.5 1 Distribution I 6 IX? procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those
malfunctions or operations:

./i I).*.**. Degraded system voltages ***************** 063A3.01 -Ability to monitor *******************
063 DC Electrical
i Ii automatic operation of the dc X I electrical system, including:
Meters, 2.7 1 *....... .. Distribution I 6 annunciators, dials, recorders, and .... . .. indicating lights . .; 064G2.4.45 -Ability to prioritize and ...... \ . X interpret the significance of each 4.1 1 . > .... annunciator or alarm. ": i**** 064 Emergency Diesel ti*;' 064K4.01 -Knowledge ofED/G Generator I 6 ,ymm X ***** interlock(s) which provide for the 3.8 1 following: Trips while loading the ED/G (frequency, voltage, speed) ******** . i> ....*.*......... 073A4.03 -Ability to manually * ' .. 073 Process Radiation ...*..... X'" operate and/or monitor in the control 3.1 1 . room: Check source for operability Monitoring I 7 '--........ demonstration Page 10 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 System # / Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 059A3.04 -Ability to monitor X automatic operation of the MFW, 2.5 1 including: Turbine driven feed pump 059 Main Feedwater /4 059K3.02 -Knowledge of the effect X that a loss or malfunction of the 3.6 1 MFW will have on the following: EFW system 061 Auxiliary / 061K3.02 -Knowledge of the effect X that a loss or malfunction of the 4.2 1 Emergency Feedwater / EFW will have on the following: 4 ,' .*... S/G 062A2.16 -Ability to (a) predict the .. impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the AC distribution system; and (b) 062 AC Electrical X based on those predictions, use 2.5 1 Distribution / 6 procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Degraded system voltages 063A3.01 -Ability to monitor 063 DC Electrical automatic operation of the dc X electrical system, including: Meters, 2.7 1 Distribution / 6 annunciators, dials, recorders, and indicating lights 064G2.4.45 -Ability to prioritize and X interpret the significance of each 4.1 1 annunciator or alarm. 064 Emergency Diesel 064K4.01 -Knowledge ofED/G Generator / 6 ... ;: system design feature(s) and/or X interlock(s) which provide for the 3.8 1 following: Trips while loading the ED/G (frequency, voltage, speed) 073A4.03 -Ability to manually 073 Process Radiation X operate and/or monitor in the control 3.1 1 Monitoring / 7 room: Check source for operability demonstration Page 10 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL -WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 K K K K K K A 14 A A System # / Name KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 3 4 I:ii 076G2.4.8 -Knowledge of how 076 Service Water / 4 abnormal operating procedures are 3.8 1 [<' I,l used in conjunction with EOPs. " 078Kl.04 -Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-078 Instrument Air / 8 X effect relationships between the lAS 2.6 1 1< lxi, and the following systems: Cooling I,:: I; water to compressor I:," I 103A2.03 -Ability to (a) predict the I I.i impacts of the following r I malfunctions or operations on the reactor building system and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures 3.5 1 ii to correct, control, or mitigate the 103 Containment / 5 Ii consequences of those malfunctions >; !:( or operations: Phase A and B isolation . ,,'.','. *** *. ***i ..... ' ...... , I03K1.01 -Knowledge of the i( '< Ii physical connections and/or cause-X '.' Ii effect relationships between the 3.6 1 >i it, reactor building system and the );' following systems: CCS lr) I'S KIA Category Totals 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 13 2 2 Ij I>.* **.* , **. Group Point Total 28/5 Page 11 of I40;\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 System # / Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 *3 4
076G2.4.8
-Knowledge of how 076 Service Water / 4 X abnormal operating procedures are 3.8 1 used in conjunction with EOPs . .. 078K1.04 -Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-078 Instrument Air / 8 X effect relationships between the lAS 2.6 1 and the following systems: Cooling I . water to compressor 103A2.03 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the reactor building system and (b) based X on those predictions, use procedures 3.5 1 to correct, control, or mitigate the 103 Containment / 5 consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Phase A andB isolation 103K1.01 -Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-X . effect relationships between the 3.6 1 .. reactor building system and the following systems: CCS KIA Category Totals 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 *3 2 2 3 Group Point Total 28/5 Page 11 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 1 IFINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # System # / Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 '2 3 4 , cc' cC 001A2.12 -Ability to (a) predict the I, impacts ofthe following I)' malfunctions or operations on the CRDS; and (b) based on those 001 Control Rod Drive / X predictions, use procedures to 3.6 1 1 correct, control or mitigate the 'cCc consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Erroneous ECP calculation I> 002 Reactor Coolant / 2 c,c*. 1.<'" &4 011 Pressurizer Level ", Control/2 " , 00 014 Rod Position Indication / 1 ,. 015K3.01 -Knowledge of the effect 015 Nuclear X that a loss or malfunction of the NIS 3.9 1 Instrumentation / 7 will have on the following: RPS 016A4.02 -Ability to manually 016 Non-nuclear X operate and/or monitor in the control 2.7 1 Instrumentation / 7 room: Recorders 017K5.02 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the 017 In-core Temperature X ..... following concepts as they apply to 3.7 1 Monitor /7 'c' .. ..,. the ITM system: Saturation and 1'0. ,:' subcooling of water 1('. I 027Kl.Ol -Knowledge of the I}:: . physical connections and/or cause-027 Containment Iodine X effect relationships between the 3.4 1 Removal/5 I *.** CIRS and the following systems: CSS 028 Hydrogen Recombiner and Purge '.' Control/5 " 029 Containment Purge / 8 . Page 12 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 System # / Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 001 A2.I2 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the CRDS; and (b) based on those 001 Control Rod Drive / X predictions, use procedures to 3.6 1 1 correct, control or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Erroneous ECP calculation 002 Reactor Coolant / 2 &4 011 Pressurizer Level Control/2 , 014 Rod Position Indication / 1 015K3.01 -Knowledge of the effect 015 Nuclear X that a loss or malfunction of the NIS 3.9 1 Instrumentation / 7 will have on the following: RPS 016A4.02 -Ability to manually 016 Non-nuclear X operate and/or monitor in the control 2.7 1 Instrumentation / 7 room: Recorders 017K5.02 -Knowledge of the operational implications of the 017 In-core Temperature X following concepts as they apply to 3.7 1 Monitor / 7 the ITM system: Saturation and , *. subcooling of water 027Kl.01 -Knowledge of the ':<', physical connections and/or cause-027 Containment Iodine X : effect relationships between the 3.4 1 Removal/5 I CIRS and the following systems: CSS 028 Hydrogen Recombiner and Purge Control/5 , 029 Containment Purge / 8 Page 12 of 14o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 1 \FINAL -WRITIEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 Form ES-401-2 System # / Name K K K K 1 2 3 4 4 Fuel Handling /8 5 Steam Generator / 4 Bypass 6 Condensate / 4 X Liquid Radwaste / 9 X 1 Waste Gas Disposal 9 5 Circulating Water / K K A 5 6 1 X X KIA Topic(s) 033A1.0 1 -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to prevent exceeding design limits) associated with operating Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System controls including: Spent fuel pool water level. 034G2.2.40 -Ability to apply Technical Specifications for a system. 041K6.03 -Knowledge of the effect of a loss or malfunction on the following will have on the Turbine Bypass Valves: Controller and positioners, including ICS, S/G, CRDS 056Kl.03 -Knowledge of the physical connections and/or effect relationships between the Condensate System and the following systems: MFW 068K4.01 -Knowledge of design feature(s) and/or interlock(s) which provide for the following: Safety and environmental precautions for handling hot, acidic, and radioactive liquids Page 13 of 140;\Crystal River Exarninations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 IR 2.7 3.4 2.7 2.6 3.4 # 1 1 1 1 1 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 System # / Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 I; ". 033Al.O 1 -Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to .< prevent exceeding design limits) 033 Spent Fuel Pool X associated with operating Spent Fuel 2.7 1 Cooling /8 I', Pool Cooling System controls I; including: Spent fuel pool water I: level. "". 034G2.2.40 -Ability to apply 034 Fuel Handling X Technical Specifications for a 3.4 1 Equipment / 8 system. 035 Steam Generator / 4 I' 041K6.03 -Knowledge of the effect of a loss or malfunction on the 041 Steam following will have on the Turbine Dump/Turbine Bypass X Bypass Valves: Controller and 2.7 1 Control / 4 . positioners, including ICS, S/G, CRDS 045 Main Turbine Generator / 4 055 Condenser Air Removal / 4 056Kl.03 -Knowledge of the I' physical connections and/or cause-056 Condensate / 4 X ..... effect relationships between the 2.6 1 Condensate System and the L following systems: MFW : 068K4.0 1 -Knowledge of design feature(s) and/or interlock(s) which X provide for the following: Safety 3.4 1 068 Liquid Radwaste / 9 and environmental precautions for handling hot, acidic, and radioactive liquids 071 Waste Gas Disposal /9 072 Area Radiation Monitoring / 7 075 Circulating Water / I'",' 8 Page 13 of 14o:ICrystal River ExaminationslInitial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAMIRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINALdocx ES-401 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 Form ES-401-2 System # / Name Station Air / 8 6 Fire Protection / 8 A Category Totals KKKKKKA 1 234 5 6 1 2011111 KIA Topic(s) Group Point Total Page 14 of 140:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 IR # 10/3 I ES-401 RO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 , System # / Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 *. 3 4 079 Station Air / 8 086 Fire Protection / 8 KIA Category Totals 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 Group Point Total 10/3 Page 14 of 140.\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Fonn ES-401-4 RO Tier! Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA Not applicable to CR3. Containment fan coolers have no 111 01IEK3.04 dampers. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OllEK3.07. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related III 022AKl.02 to this KA. High delta P, more flow. Low delta P, less flow. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA#022AK1.03. 111 055EK2.04 No IR value assigned in NUREG-l 122. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #055EK3.02. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related 112 0OIAA2.02 to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OOlAA2.05. Not applicable to CR3. Our ECCS system has no water level 211 006K5.01 input for automatic operation and no manual operator actions based on water level. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OO6K5.04. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related 2/1 I03A2.05 to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #103A2.03. Generic 2.1.35 IR value only2.2 for ROs. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #G2.1.36. Not applicable to CR3. CR3 does not have "first-out" alarm 111 007EA2.05 indications for a reactor trip. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OO7EA2.02. Not applicable to CR3. CR3 does not have SW/RW flow control 111 056AA1.28 valves. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #056AA1.05. 212 028A2.03 At CR3 actions for this KA are SRO only level knowledge. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #028A2.02. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related 2/2 028A2.02 to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OOlA2.l2. o:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline -Rejected KAs(401-4)FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Fonn ES-401-4 RO Tier! Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA Not applicable to CR3. Containment fan coolers have no 111 011EK3.04 dampers. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OllEK3.07. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related III 022AK1.02 to this KA. High delta P, more flow. Low delta P, less flow. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA#022AK1.03. III 055EK2.04 No IR value assigned in NUREG-1122. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #055EK3.02. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related 1/2 0OlAA2.02 to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OOlAA2.05. Not applicable to CR3. Our ECCS system has no water level 211 006K5.01 input for automatic operation and no manual operator actions based on water level. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OO6K5.04. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related 211 103A2.05 to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #103A2.03. Generic 2.1.35 IR value only2.2 for ROs. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #G2.1.36. Not applicable to CR3. CR3 does not have "first-out" alarm 111 007EA2.05 indications for a reactor trip. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OO7EA2.02. Not applicable to CR3. CR3 does not have SW/RW flow control III 056AA1.28 valves. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #056AA1.05. 2/2 028A2.03 At CR3 actions for this KA are SRO only level knowledge. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #028A2.02. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related 2/2 028A2.02 to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OOlA2.12. o:\Crystal River Examinations\lnitial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\RO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline -Rejected KAs (401-4) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 FINAL ES-401 SRO -PWR Examination Outline -(Sept, 2009) Form ES-401-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: September, 2009 RO KJ A Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group K K K K K K A A A A G TOTAL A2 G* TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4
I. 1 18 3 3 6 Emergency 2 9 2 2 4 & Abnonnal N/A N/A Plant Evolutions Tier 27 5 5 10 Totals 1 28 3 2 5 2. Plant 2 10 2 1 3 Systems Tier Totals 38 5 3 8 3. Generic Knowledge and 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 Abilities Categories 2 2 1 2 Note: l. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KIA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each KIA category shall not be less than two). 2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/- I from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions.
The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points. 3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.l.b of ES-40 I for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate KIA statements.
4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.

5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those KlAs having an importance rating (IR) of2.5 or higher shall be selected.
Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.
6. Select SRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and KIA categories.
7.* The generic (0) KI As in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KIA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to section d.l.b of ES-40 I for the applicable KI As. 8. On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or 0* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side ofColurnn A2 for Tier 2, Group 2. (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams. 9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the KIA catalog, and enter the KIA numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Fonn ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to KlAs that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43. Page 1 of lOO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 FINAL ES-401 SRO -PWR Examination Outline -(Sept, 2009) Form ES-401-2 Facility: Crystal River Unit #3 Date of Exam: September, 2009 RO KIA Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group K K K K K K A A A A G TOTAL A2 G* TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4
1. 1 18 3 3 6 Emergency 2 9 2 2 4 & Abnonnal N/A N/A Plant Evolutions Tier 27 5 5 10 Totals 1 28 3 2 5 2. Plant 2 10 2 1 3 Systems Tier Totals 38 5 3 8 3. Generic Knowledge and 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 Abilities Categories 2 2 1 2 Note: 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable KIA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each KIA category shall not be less than two). 2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/- I from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions.
The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points. 3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.l.b of ES-40 I for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate KIA statements. 4, Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution, 5, Absent a plant-specific priority, only those KlAs having an importance rating (IR) of2,5 or higher shall be selected, Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively, 6, Select SRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and KIA categories, 7,* The generic (G) KI As in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 ofthe KIA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system, Refer to section d, I, b of ES-40 I for the applicable KI As, 8. On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2. (Note #1 does not apply), Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams, 9, For Tier3, select topics from Section 2 of the KIA catalog, and enter the KIA numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Fonn ES-401-3, Limit SRO selections to KlAs that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43, Page 1 of lOO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 P"'R Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 1 >, " E/APE # I Name I K K K A A " KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 ',2,,' ;;',',;.' ,i:; .. 007 (BW/E02 & ElO) Reactor Trip -Stabilization
't .. :, .. ,';; -Recovery -1 '. 008 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident 13 ", 009 Small Break LOCA 1 3 ., 011 Large Break LOCA 1 3 015/17 RCP Malfunctions 14 "
022AA2.01 -Ability to determine and 022 Loss ofRx Coolant interpret the following as they apply to Makeup 1 2 the Loss of Reactor Coolant Pump 3.8 1 Makeup: Whether makeup line leak . exists 025 Loss ofRHR System 1 4 026 Loss of Component Cooling Water 1 8 " 1;:\( ,:' 027 AG2.4.9 -Knowledge of low power 1 027 PZR Pressure Control ;X shutdown implications in accident (e.g. 4.2 1 System Malfunction 1 3 LOCA or loss ofDH) mitigation strategies. 029 ATWS 11 038 Steam Generator Tube Rupture 1 3 : 040 (BW/E05) Steam Line Rupture -Excessive Heat Transfer 1 4 ." .,"',: , 054 Loss of Main Feedwater ) , . ',' . "'" 14 .",'. .".' ::,'" 055 Station Blackout 1 6 Page 2 of 1 OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I K K K A A. G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2: : ... ' .. 007 (BW/E02 & E10) **i *..* ******** Reactor Trip -Stabilization -Recovery -1 008 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident 13 009 Small Break LOCA 1 3 011 Large Break LOCA 1 3 015/17 RCP Malfunctions 14 ." ...... 022AA2.01 -Ability to determine and 022 Loss of Rx Coolant >. . interpret the following as they apply to Makeup 1 2 '.' the Loss of Reactor Coolant Pump 3.8 1 " ", .....: Makeup: Whether makeup line leak exists 025 Loss ofRHR System 1 4 026 Loss of Component Cooling Water 18 027 AG2.4.9 -Knowledge oflow power 1 027 PZR Pressure Control X shutdown implications in accident (e.g. 4.2 1 System Malfunction 13 .... LOCA or loss ofDH) mitigation . strategies. 029 ATWS 1 1 038 Steam Generator Tube Rupture 1 3 040 (BW/E05) Steam Line .' Rupture -Excessive Heat < Transfer 1 4 */1. 054 Loss of Main Feedwater ' '"i, I,i* 14 I*:*****:* 055 Station Blackout 1 6 Page 2 of 100:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30l\FINAL-WRIITEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 11 Group 1 .........*
....... E/APE # I Name / K K K A KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 056 Loss of Offsite Power 1 .. ' ........*..
I* *** *.*.****)*** 056AG2.4.45 -Ability to prioritize and 6 .......... IX interpret the significance of each 4.3 1 it.: *** annunciator or alarm. \. . ............ , .... ...... I"* '.'< 057 AA2.05 -Ability to determine and 057 Loss of Vital AC .**...* ..*...* interpret the following as they apply to 3.8 1 Instrument Bus 1 6 1\ the Loss of Vital AC Instrument Bus: **..*.* < ** I:****.* S/G pressure and level meters 058AA2.03 -DC loads lost; impact on 058 Loss of DC Power 16 ability to operate and monitor plant 3.5 1 I': systems . 062 Loss of Nuclear Services .... :. lil Water 1 4 'iJI(r I':i; 065 Loss ofInstrument Air / **.*. ;J.( I: 8 <>' BW IE04 Inadequate Heat ....*....*..
.. ................*.
Transfer -Loss of ...... .....* Secondary Heat Sink 1 4 i**** ..... Ii ...... 077 Generator Voltage and Electric Grid Disturbances 1 \i"<" Ii? 077AG2.2.12 -Knowledge of 4.1 1 6 surveillance procedures. <**i f I;*\(*i,'@ KIA Category Totals .*. "".' Ii;:):! Group Point Total 18/6 0 1 .** 0" Page 3 of 1 OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 1 E/APE # I Name I K K K A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 '2 '. ," " 056 Loss of Offsite Power 1 056AG2,4,45 -Ability to prioritize and 6 X interpret the significance of each 4.3 1 annunciator or alann. 057 AA2.05 -Ability to detennine and 057 Loss of Vital AC X interpret the following as they apply to 3.8 1 Instrument Bus 1 6 the Loss of Vital AC Instrument Bus: . S/G pressure and level meters 058AA2.03 -DC loads lost; impact on 058 Loss of DC Power 16 1% .... ability to operate and monitor plant 3.5 1 ). systems. 062 Loss of Nuclear Services Water 1 4 065 Loss of Instrument Air 1 , 8 BW/E04 Inadequate Heat Transfer -Loss of Secondary Heat Sink 1 4 077 Generator Voltage and 077AG2.2.12 -Knowledge of Electric Grid Disturbances 1 X 4.1 1 6 surveillance procedures. i> :' I; . KIA Category Totals 3 ,* .. 3 Group Point Total 18/6 Page 3 of 100:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I K K K A f?! KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 ........ .. 001 Continuous Rod Withdrawal/ 1 003 Dropped Control Rod / 1 .... r** I*' 005 Inoperable/Stuck Rod / 1 024 Emergency Boration / 1 I, Ii '. '.' I:'" .'. 028 PZR Level Malfunction / .... ; 2 .' 1** .* **.;<* 032 Loss of Source Range .... I '" .... NIl 7 033 Loss ofIntermediate Range NI / 7 ..... ;" } .. 036 (BW / A08) Fuel .... ;. ; ..... : Handling Accident / 8 ": ..... .' 037 Steam Generator Tube ...*......*..
.... . '

'; Leak/3 ... ** 051 Loss of Condenser Vacuum / 4 059 Accidental Liquid RadWaste ReI. / 9 ii . ;' .. 060 Accidental Gaseous . Radwaste ReI. I 9 .' ; .... 061AA2.06
-Ability to determine and ; .... .. ,.,' ....... , interpret the following as they apply to 061 ARM System Alarms / 7 .. iX" the Area Radiation Monitoring (ARM) 4.l 1 . System Alarms: Required actions if alarm channel is out of service 067 Plant Fire On-site / 8 ...... ';"; Page 4 of I OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINALdocx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I K K K A *...... \1 Safety Function 1 2 3 1 "i':** *.>0:* KIA Topic(s) IR # , ',,: :' .. ' . 001 Continuous Rod Withdrawal/ 1 003 Dropped Control Rod / 1 005 Inoperable/Stuck Rod / 1 024 Emergency Boration / 1 028 PZR Level Malfunction / 2 032 Loss of Source Range NIl 7 033 Loss ofIntermediate Range NI / 7 , .. .' . 036 (BW/A08) Fuel Handling Accident / 8 . 037 Steam Generator Tube Leak /3 051 Loss of Condenser Vacuum/4 059 Accidental Liquid RadWaste Rel. / 9 060 Accidental Gaseous Radwaste Rel. / 9 ,. > 061AA2.06 -Ability to determine and I ,. interpret the following as they apply to .'. 061 ARM System Alarms / 7 X the Area Radiation Monitoring (ARM) 4.1 1 I ,! < System Alarms: Required actions if .... : I alarm channel is out of service 067 Plant Fire On-site / 8 Page 4 of 100;\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline(401-2)FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I Safety Function 068 (BW/A06) Control Room Evac. I 8 KKK A 123 1 KIA Topic(s) 069AG2.2.38 -Knowledge of IR 069 Loss of CTMT Integrity IS conditions and limitations in the facility 4.5 074 Inad. Core Cooling I 4 076 High Reactor Coolant Activity I 9 BW/AOI Plant Runbackl I BW/A02&A03 Loss XIY 17 BW/A04 Turbine Trip I 4 BW/A05 Emergency Diesel Actuation I 6 BW/A07 Flooding 18 BW/E03 Inadequate Subcooling Margin I 4 BW 1E08,LOCA Cooldown -Depress. 14 BWlE09 Natural Circ. 14 KIA Category Totals license. BW/A03AG2.4.6 -Knowledge ofEOP mitigation strategies. BW/E09EA2.2 -Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the (Natural Circulation Cooldown): Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments. Group Point Total 4.7 4.0 Page 5 of 100:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 # 1 1 1 9/4 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -Tier 1 I Group 2 E/APE # I Name I K K K A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # Safety Function 1 2 3 1 2 068 (BW/A06) Control Room Evac. I 8 069 Loss of CTMT Integrity 069AG2.2.38 -Knowledge of 15 1:,,';:; :X conditions and limitations in the facility 4.5 1 I*:; ..; ;)'; license. " " 074 Inad. Core Cooling I 4 076 High Reactor Coolant Activity I 9 BW/AOI Plant Runback I I BW/A02&A03 Loss ofNNI-I ,X BW/A03AG2.4.6 -Knowledge ofEOP 4.7 1 XIY I 7 mitigation strategies. BW/A04 Turbine Trip I 4 BW I A05 Emergency Diesel Actuation I 6 BW/A07 Flooding 18 BW IE03 Inadequate Subcooling Margin I 4 ,I') ,: ' " "', BW/E08 LOCA Cooldown -Depress. 14 BW/E09 Natural Circ. 14 BW/E09EA2.2 -Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply X to the (Natural Circulation Cooldown): 4.0 1 Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments. KIA Category Totals 2 2 Group Point Total 9/4 Page 5 of lOO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL-WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 System # / Name K K K K K K A A A KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 3 4 ... " .. . '. . ....... . .... 003 Reactor Coolant
............
Pump /4 'il' 004 Chemical and i;';j Volume Control / 1 & 2 i ........*.... I: ' .. 00SA2.0 1 -Ability to (a) predict the .. impacts of the following malfunctions
...* or operations on the Decay Heat .........
System, and (b) based on those OOS Residual Heat I predictions, use procedures to correct, 2.9 1 Removal/4 control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Failure modes for pressure, flow, .........*. pump motor amps, motor temperature, and tank level instrumentation }; 006 Emergency Core n. Cooling / 2 & 3 /:? *...... ......*...... 1< 007 PZR Relief/Quench ., I Tank / S .* > I .........*.. ' ;'; I*.* .** ** *. 008 Component Cooling >"; [iii! Water / 8 ***************** ..... * **************** 008 Component Cooling .. ' Water /8 ******* 010 Pressurizer Pressure <. ***** ;;: .. :.' Control/3
i)* , ..*.......*...
012 Reactor Protection / Ol2G2.2.12 -Knowledge of 4.1 1 7 surveillance procedures. 013 Engineered Safety Features Actuation / 2 .; Page 6 of lOO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 System # / Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 003 Reactor Coolant Pump /4 ., ... .. 004 Chemical and Volume Control/I & 2 005A2.0l -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the Decay Heat System, and (b) based on those 005 Residual Heat X predictions, use procedures to correct, 2.9 1 Removal/4
. , control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations:
Failure modes for pressure, flow, T(;* pump motor amps, motor temperature, and tank level instrumentation ... 006 Emergency Core Cooling / 2 & 3 007 PZR Relief/Quench Tank/5 008 Component Cooling Water /8 008 Component Cooling Water /8 010 Pressurizer Pressure Control/3 -<. 012 Reactor Protection / .. ' .... , Ol2G2.2.l2 -Knowledge of X surveillance procedures . 4.1 1 7 . ' o l3 Engineered Safety Features Actuation /2 Page 6 of 100:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINALdocx ES-401 ! ES-401 ES-401 System # / Name Containment Spray / AC Electrical lDi!!tril::.uticm / 6 DC Electrical UDi!!tril::.uticm / 6 064 Emergency Diesel Generator / 6 073 Process Radiation IIMo'nitoring 17 SRO Form ES-401-2! PWR Examination Outline Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 Form ES-401-2 KKKKKKA 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 KIA Topic(s) 039G2.4.20 -Knowledge of the operational implications of EOP warnings, cautions, and notes. 062A2.01 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the AC distribution system; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Types of loads that, if de-energized, would degrade or hinder plant operation IR 4.3 3.9 Page 7 of 1 OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 # 1 1 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 1 K K K K K K A A A A System # / Name " G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 12 3 4 ", 022 Containment I,:,: Cooling! 5 '! 026 Containment Spray! 5 039 Main and Reheat 039G2.4.20 -Knowledge of the X operational implications of EOP 4.3 1 Steam! 4 warnings, cautions, and notes. 059 Main Feedwater ! 4 ,," 061 Auxiliary ! Emergency Feedwater! 4 062A2.01 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the AC distribution system; and (b) 062 AC Electrical X based on those predictions, use 3.9 1 Distribution! 6 procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those , malfunctions or operations: Types of loads that, if de-energized, would degrade or hinder plant operation 063 DC Electrical Distribution! 6 064 Emergency Diesel Generator! 6 ,'" " 073 Process Radiation Monitoring! 7 Page 7 of 1 OO:\Crystal River Examinations\lnitial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 ! ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2! ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 I Group 1 System # I Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 ..... , I,,** " 076A2.01 -Ability to (a) predict the 11:.< r n:, impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the I: ':. RWS; and (b) based on those 076 Service Water /4 *X: predictions, use procedures to 3.7 1 .. .. : correct, control, or mitigate the 1< consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Loss of RWS 078 Instrument Air / 8 ..... ;,. I .*. : .. ; I .. 1 03 Containment / 5 I***. ...... I .' . KJ A Category Totals 3 2 Group Point Total 28/5 Page 8 of 1 OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 1 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 I Group 1 System # I Name K K K K K K A A A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 . 076A2.01 -Ability to (a) predict the >: ... impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the 076 Service Water / 4 X' RWS; and (b) based on those 3.7 1 predictions, use procedures to .. correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Loss of RWS 078 Instrument Air / 8 103 Containment / 5 .... ; K! A Category Totals 3 2 Group Point Total 28/5 Page 8 of 1 OO;\C!),stai River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 K K K K K K A lit: A A G l System # / N arne ;. KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 3 4 ['>i*> ........ , 001 Control Rod Drive! ****.*....* < 1 ...... I ii 002A2.02 -Ability to (a) predict the I' i impacts of the following I: malfunctions or operations on the 002 Reactor Coolant! 2 I.' RCS; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to 4.4 I &4 correct, control or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions I ...*** i.' or operations: Loss of coolant Iii r I* pressure /. 011 Pressurizer Level l;t*iJ Control! 2 014 Rod Position I{/ fi o 14G2.1.27 -Knowledge of system purpose and! or function. 4.0 1 Indication! 1 1/" I******.***. 015 Nuclear I.***.** Instrumentation! 7 *.... .' 016 Non-nuclear ..... ..... Instrumentation! 7 .. 017 In-core Temperature I 1<***** Monitor! 7 ';'" Iii:: ;" Iii 027 Containment Iodine i;\i I' ....* Removal! 5 I 028 Hydrogen in Recombiner and Purge Control! 5 029 Containment Purge! ....... .';'" ...................*.* . ............ 8 .... * .....* <.> .' 033 Spent Fuel Pool ./', Cooling! 8 Page 9 of 1 OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 System # / Name K K K K K K A k A A G KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 001 Control Rod Drive / 1 002A2.02 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the 002 Reactor Coolant / 2 RCS; and (b) based on those ,X predictions, use procedures to 4.4 1 &4 " correct, control or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Loss of coolant pressure 011 Pressurizer Level Control/2 014 Rod Position X o 14G2.1.27 -Knowledge of system purpose and / or function. 4.0 1 Indication / 1 015 Nuclear Instrumentation / 7 016 Non-nuclear Instrumentation / 7 017 In-core Temperature Monitor / 7 027 Containment Iodine Removal/5 ," , " 028 Hydrogen " Recombiner and Purge :, Control/5 029 Containment Purge / 8 033 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling / 8 ':, Page 9 of 1 OO:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 1 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 I ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 System # / Name K K K K K K A******* A KIA Topic(s} IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 3 il.Y* 034A2.01 -Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following ,:2 I,) malfunctions or operations on the 034 Fuel Handling Fuel Handling System; and (b) based 4.4 1 Equipment / 8 on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control or mitigate the ..... 1.*(; .* consequences of those malfunctions / I or operations: Dropped fuel element 035 Steam Generator /4 .* *.*.***.*i Ii I> ii ......... 041 Steam i:* ... *.** ... *** ********* Dump/Turbine Bypass > I'>j Control/4
i j I*' t{ ............
045 Main Turbine .. *.r. Ii Generator / 4 i I.i. 055 Condenser Air :<::, 1**.* .* *.*\*.*. Removal / 4 Iz> c.** 1>/ 056 Condensate / 4 ii* I. j *.***.******.**** . ..........*.. 068 Liquid Radwaste / 9 Ii ............ .... 071 Waste Gas Disposal ['i} !> 1/9 Ii i* ..*** I' 072 Area Radiation I t J1} Monitoring / 7 075 Circulating Water / 1,1 i , 8 I. . .... 079 Station Air / 8 ..............*.*..... 086 Fire Protection / 8 ,. ..... I' . :\ K/ A Category Totals 1-Group Point Total 10/3 Page 10 of 100:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-30 I \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-401 ES-401 SRO Form ES-401-2 I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Plant Systems -Tier 2 / Group 2 System # / Name K K K K K K A A A A G" KIA Topic(s) IR # 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 3 4 >" , o} e:e 034A2.01 -Ability to (a) predict the eee.e impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the 034 Fuel Handling X I Fuel Handling System; and (b) based 4.4 1 Equipment / 8 I* on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Dropped fuel element 035 Steam Generator / 4 041 Steam Dump/Turbine Bypass Control / 4 045 Main Turbine Generator / 4 055 Condenser Air Removal / 4 056 Condensate / 4 068 Liquid Radwaste / 9 071 Waste Gas Disposal /9 I.e 072 Area Radiation Monitoring / 7 075 Circulating Water / 8 079 Station Air /8 086 Fire Protection / 8 KIA Category Totals 2 e 1 Group Point Total 10/3 Page 10 of 100:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline (401-2) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 ES-401 Record of Rejected KJ As Fonn ES-401-4 SRO Tierl Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJA Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound 112 061AA2.02 question related to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #061AA2.06. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound 211 062A2.14 question related to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #062A2.01. Not applicable to CR3. Containment iodine removal 2/2 027A2.01 is accomplished via the RB Spray system. There are NO filters associated with this system. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #034A2.01. Not applicable to CR3. No hydrogen recombiner or 2/2 028A2.01 hydrogen recombining equipment at CR3. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OO2A2.02. Not possible to write an SRO level question for this 111 065AA2.04 KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #058AA2.03. Page 1 of 1 O:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301\FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline -Rejected KAs (401-4) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 ES-401 Record of Rejected KJ As FOnTI ES-401-4 SRO Tier/ Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJ A Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound 112 061AA2.02 question related to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #061AA2.06. Not possible to prepare a psychometrically sound 211 062A2.14 question related to this KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #062A2.01. Not applicable to CR3. Containment iodine removal 212 027A2.01 is accomplished via the RB Spray system. There are NO filters associated with this system. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #034A2.01. Not applicable to CR3. No hydrogen recombiner or 212 028A2.01 hydrogen recombining equipment at CR3. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #OO2A2.02. Not possible to write an SRO level question for this 111 065AA2.04 KA. Chief Examiner randomly selected new KA #058AA2.03. Page 1 of 1 O:\Crystal River Examinations\Initial Exam 2009-301 \FINAL -WRITTEN EXAM\SRO NRC 2K9 Written Exam Outline -Rejected KAs (401-4) FINAL.docx ES-40 1 ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES*401*6 Facility:* Crystal River Unit 3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/22/09 Exam Level: RO. SRO. Item Description
1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

2. a. b. NRC KJAs are referenced for all questions.
Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). 5. 6. 7. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or _ the examinations were developed independently; or X the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or _ other (explain) Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. Bank Modified 37 I 8 DID Memory New 38/17 CIA Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KJAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right. 35 I 5 40 I 20 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
9. Question content conforms with specific KJA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. a. Author Printed Name ,d" Alan Kennedv / . u;;. .. b. Facility Reviewer (*) Flo'Ld Lawrence
'.... .Jf1; c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) d. NRC Regional Supervisor \ Note:
The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Initial a b* fl AK FL AJ AK FL AK FL AK FL AK FL AK AK FL AK FL IJ AK FL AK FL 1 AK FL r! I Date 09/08/09 09/0810.9 c, #7/ (IJfj "/I?-lo9 ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Crystal River Unit 3 Date of Exam: 08/31/09 thru 09/22109 Exam Level: RO
Item Description

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

2. a. b. NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions.
Facility leaminQ objectives are referenced as available.
3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). 5. 6. 7. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or _ the examinations were developed independently; or X the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or _ other (explain) Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. Bank Modified 37 I 8 010 Memory New 38/17 CIA Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right. 35 I 5 40 I 20 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the Quidelines in ES Appendix B. 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. Printed Name I / _ // Alan Kennedy ..
/ a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (*) C. NRC Chief Examiner (#) d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:
The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Form ES-401-6 SRO
Initial a b* tl. AK FL L4l t AK FL AK FL " AK FL Jt AK FL AK AK FL ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301 SRO Written Examination Review Worksheet FINAL Form ES-401-9 0# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. LOD (1-5) Stem Icuesl T/F I cred'l Partial I JOb-I Minutia I #1 I Back-I 0= I SRO I utE! Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S Instructions

7. Explanation
[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. Enter the level of difficulty (LaD) of each question using a 1 -5 (easy -difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 -4 range are acceptable). Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.

One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met). ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301 SRO Written Examination Review Worksheet FINAL Form ES-401-9 Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws LOD

6. 7. (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S Instructions
[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 -5 (easy -difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 -4 range are acceptable). Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.

One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X B U 002A2.02 May not meet KIA. (Question meets the* 01fi6 second portion, but can be written to meet both) What is the impact on the RCS of lowering RCS Pressure?
You are testing the impact of a component that will affect RCS Pressure. Borderline SRO. Distractor C may also be considered correct as written. Nothing in the stem makes a failed number 1 seal on 1 B plausible. NEW Understand Issues will continue to work. 8/5/2009 eR3 -Replaced question. H 2 X U 005A2.01 Appears to meet KIA. Not SRO only. 02fi7 This question can be answered using systems knowledge, and procedure entry requirements. The only item in this question that would indicate upcoming pump damage is pump cavitation. NEW Continue to work CR3 -Replaced question. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X B U 002A2.02 May not meet KIA. (Question meets the 01176 second portion, but can be written to meet both) What is the impact on the RCS of lowering RCS Pressure? You are testing the impact of a component that wi" affect RCS Pressure. Borderline SRO. Distractor C may also be considered correct as written. Nothing in the stem makes a failed number 1 seal on 1 B plausible. NEW Understand Issues will continue to work. 8/5/2009 eR3 -Replaced question. H 2 X U 005A2.01 Appears to meet KIA. Not SRO only. 02177 This question can be answered using systems knowledge, and procedure entry requirements. The only item in this question that would indicate upcoming pump damage is pump cavitation. NEW Continue to work CR3 -Replaced question.
1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X S 012G2.2.12 Question appears to match KIA. 03/78 Question may not be SRO only. This appears to be a precaution/limitation in the surveillance procedure.
Who performs the procedure? If this procedure is performed by an RO then this is RO knowledge. Will discuss. NEW Procedure not performed by RO Sat S CR3 -No change. 4/79 H 2 X E 014G2.1.27 Question kind of matches KIA. Appears to be SRO only. Why do you state in the distractors "for SDM purposes," the basis document discusses control rod operability as a function of being able to insert into the core. By this definition the rod is operable lAW TS 3.1.4. Some enhancements in the structure of the question are needed. MOD 2006 Oconee NRC Exam (need to see the original question or this will be treated as a bank question) Made several changes to stem and all distractors. SAT 8/5/2009. S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Parlia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X S 012G2.2.12 Question appears to match KIA. 03na Question may not be SRO only. This appears to be a precaution/limitation in the surveillance procedure.
Who performs the procedure? If this procedure is performed by an RO then this is RO knowledge. Will discuss. NEW Procedure not performed by RO Sat S eR3 -No change. 4/79 H 2 X E 014G2.1.27 Question kind of matches KIA. Appears to be SRO only. Why do you state in the distractors "for SOM purposes," the basis document discusses control rod operability as a function of being able to insert into the core. By this definition the rod is operable lAW TS 3.1.4. Some enhancements in the structure of the question are needed. MOD 2006 Oconee NRC Exam (need to see the original question or this will be treated as a bank question) Made several changes to stem and all distractors. SAT 8/5/2009. S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X E 022AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. 5/80 What in the conditions of the stem allows the operator to determine that a small PZR steam space leak is not occurring?
What is incorrect about going through the first steps of AP 520? NEW Changes to stem (event! appropriate path) SAT 8/5/2009 5 CR3-Modified as discussed. H 2 X X X U 027AGG2.4.9 Kind of matches KIA. As written, 6/81 not SRO only. Distractors A and C are not plausible (535 degrees is not even close to PTS concerns). Ask what action is required, not what action you would direct the RO to take. If A and C are not plausible, then the question can be answered using systems knowledge, therefore not SRO only. Made changes to stem to make a and C more plausible. SRO only. NEW SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X E 022AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. 5/80 What in the conditions of the stem allows the operator to determine that a small PZR steam space leak is not occurring? What is incorrect about going through the first steps of AP 520? NEW Changes to stem (event! appropriate path) SAT 8/5/2009 S CR3-Modified as discussed. H 2 X X X U 027AGG2.4.9 Kind of matches KIA. As written, 6/81 not SRO only. Distractors A and C are not plausible (535 degrees is not even close to PTS concerns). Ask what action is required, not what action you would direct the RO to take. If A and C are not plausible, then the question can be answered using systems knowledge, therefore not SRO only. Made changes to stem to make a and C more plausible. SRO only. NEW SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 -No change.
1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO u/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 7/82 H 2 X E 034A2.01 Question appears to match Kf A. Appears to be SRO only. Stem focus needs to be improved.
Which ONE of the following choices "Correctly" completes the .... Is the Iodine removal factor a common term at CR-3? NEW Made changes to stem and distractors. SAT. 8/6/2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed. 8/83 H 2 S 039G2.4.20 Question appears to match the KIA. Appears to be SRO only. NEW S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 056AG2.4.45 Question appears to match the 9/84 KIA. Appears to be SRO Only. NEW S eR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S 7/82 H 2 X E 034A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. Appears to be SRO only. Stem focus needs to be improved. Which ONE of the following choices "Correctly" completes the .... Is the Iodine removal factor a common term at CR-3? NEW Made changes to stem and distractors. SAT. 8/6/2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed. 8/83 H 2 S 039G2.4.20 Question appears to match the KIA. Appears to be SRO only. NEW S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 056AG2.4.45 Question appears to match the 9/84 KIA. Appears to be SRO Only. NEW S eR3 -No change.
1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO u/E1 Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 3 X U 057 AA2.05 Question appears to match the KIA. Question does not appear to be SRO 10/85 only. Although the step is in the middle of the procedure, the applicant need only know which fFW pump valves could be controlled to determine that the #1 EFW pump should' be started. NEW Changed the stem. All distractors, Moved picture. SAT. 8/6/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed. F 2 S 061 AA2.06 Question appears to match the K/ A. 11/86 Appears to be SRO only. NEW S eR3 -No change. H 2 B E 062A2.01 Question appears to match K/ A. 12/87 Borderline SRO will Discuss. Otherwise sat. NEW Added fOP* 14 enclosure

7. SAT. S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
--1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S H 3 X U 057 AA2.05 Question appears to match the KIA. Question does not appear to be SRO 10/85 only. Although the step is in the middle of the procedure, the applicant need only know which EFW pump valves could be controlled to determine that the #1 EFW pump should' be started. NEW Changed the stem. All distractors, Moved picture. SAT. 8/6/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed. F 2 S 061AA2.06 Question appears to match the KIA. 11/86 Appears to be SRO only. NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 B E 062A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. 12/87 Borderline SRO will Discuss. Otherwise sat. NEW Added EOP-14 enclosure
7. SAT. S CR3 -Modified as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation i Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 065AA2.04 Question appears to match KIA. 13/88 Does not appear to be SRO only. Typically when to trip the reactor on loss of Instrument air is an RO knowledge item. NEW Gerry to select new KIA. NEW KA -058AA2.03 CR3 -Wrote new question.
H 2 X E 069AG2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. 14/89 Appears to be SRO only. The way the question is written, it appears that the plant is in mode 4, and it is okay to continue to heat up ( and stay in mode 4). The question should be is the plant allowed to change modes. What reference is to be provided to the applicant? Second part of question needs some work. NEW Changed stem and distractors. SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed.
1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 065AA2.04 Question appears to match KIA. 13/88 Does not appear to be SRO only. Typically when to trip the reactor on loss of Instrument air is an RO knowledge item. NEW Gerry to select new KIA. NEW KA -058AA2.03 CR3 -Wrote new question.
H 2 X E 069AG2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. 14/89 Appears to be SRO only. The way the question is written, it appears that the plant is in mode 4, and it is okay to continue to heat up ( and stay in mode 4). The question should be is the plant allowed to change modes. What reference is to be provided to the applicant? Second part of question needs some work. NEW Changed stem and distractors. SAT 8/6/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 076A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. With 15/90 an operability assessment of the UHS, the question appears to be SRO only. The operability determination needs to be more pronounced. (the UHS is operablel inoperable).

BANK Changed stem and distractors SAT 4/06/2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed. H 2 X X U 077 AG2.2. 12 Question kind of matches K/ A. 16/91 This question is based on the precautions and limitations of SPs. Who normally performs these SPs? If these are performed by an RO, then the RO is also responsible for the P and L's, and this is not an SRO level question. What is the difference between an EGDG and an ES DG. Are we talking about the same diesel in this question? Did not find in SP-354A the step that directs the CRS to have the operator perform SP907 A enclosure

2. Not sure that there is a correct answer for the question as written. NEW Made some changes to stem. Will have another examiner look at. CR3 -No change yet. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO U/E! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 076A2.01 Question appears to match KIA. With 15/90 an operability assessment of the UHS, the question appears to be SRO only. The operability determination needs to be more pronounced. (the UHS is operable/

inoperable). BANK Changed stem and distractors SAT 4/06/2009 S CR3 -Modified as discussed. H 2 X X U 077 AG2.2.12 Question kind of matches KIA. 16/91 This question is based on the precautions and limitations of SPs. Who normally performs these SPs? If these are performed by an RO, then the RO is also responsible for the P and L's, and this is not an SRO level question. What is the difference between an EGDG and an ES DG. Are we talking about the same diesel in this question? Did not find in SP-354A the step that directs the CRS to have the operator perform SP907 A enclosure

2. Not sure that there is a correct answer for the question as written. NEW Made some changes to stem. Will havE another examiner look at. CR3 -No change yet.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U BW/A03AG2.4.6 Question appears to match 17/92 KIA. Not sure this is SRO only. This appears to be a question on EOP/AOP procedure usage that may be both RO and SRO knowledge.

I found no material that supports answer D as the only correct answer, in fact answer B could also be correct, if the SRO determined that he did not have an operator available to perform the ARP, Need to tighten up the question. MOD Need a copy of the original question to verify that this is a modified question. Made changes to stem and all distractors. SAT 8/07/2009. S eR3 -Modified as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO u/E1 Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U BW/A03AG2.4.6 Question appears to match 17/92 KIA. Not sure this is SRO only. This appears to be a question on EOP/AOP procedure usage that may be both RO and SRO knowledge.
I found no material that supports answer 0 as the only correct answer, in fact answer 8 could also be correct, if the SRO determined that he did not have an operator available to perform the ARP. Need to tighten up the question. MOD Need a copy of the original question to verify that this is a modified question. Made changes to stem and all distractors. SAT 8/07/2009. S eR3 -Modified as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U BW IE09EA2.2 Question does not meet the KIA. 18/93 The KIA asks for the Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Natural Circulation Cooldown):

Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments. The question as written lists the procedure flowpath from the point of entry into the EOPs until the final procedure selection is made. No limitations are being tested. This procedure flowpath can be determined from procedure entry requirements, therefore it is not SRO only. Rewrite using limits for cooldown. eR3 -Wrote new question.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X U BW/E09EA2.2 Question does not meet the KIA. 18/93 The KIA asks for the Ability to determine and interpret the following as they apply to the Natural Circulation Cooldown):

Adherence to appropriate procedures and operation within the limitations in the facility's license and amendments. The question as written lists the procedure flowpath from the point of entry into the EOPs until the final procedure selection is made. No limitations are being tested. This procedure flowpath can be determined from procedure entry requirements, therefore it is not SRO only. Rewrite using limits for cooldown. eR3 -Wrote new question.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U G2.1.5 (Question in exam submittal has KIA as 19/94 2.1.15, but the ES 401-3 has the KIA listed as 2.1.5. Question appears to match KIA 2.1.5. Distractors A and B are essentially stating the same thing, if one is incorrect both are, and if one is correct, then both would be correct. Therefore, distractors A and B are not plausible.

Replace distractors A and B. BANK Changed A and B distractors and moved order of distractors. SAT. Sn12009. S CR3 -Modified as discussed. I , H 2 B E G2.1.S Question appears to match KIA. Not 20/95 Sure if it is SRO only. Could the answer be determined using only systems knowledge? Will discuss. NEW Made changes to stem and discussed why question was SRO only. SAT Snl2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U G2.1.5 (Question in exam submittal has KIA as 19/94 2.1.15, but the ES 401-3 has the KIA listed as 2.1.5. Question appears to match KIA 2.1.5. Distractors A and B are essentially stating the same thing, if one is incorrect both are, and if one is correct, then both would be correct. Therefore, distractors A and B are not plausible. Replace distractors A and B. BANK Changed A and B distractors and moved order of distractors. SAT. Sn12009. S CR3 -Modified as discussed. H 2 B E G2.1.S Question appears to match KIA. Not 20/95 Sure if it is SRO only. Could the answer be determined using only systems knowledge? Will discuss. NEW Made changes to stem and discussed why question was SRO only. SAT Snl2009 S eR3 -Modified as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E G2.2.37 Question appears to match KIA. 21/96 Appears to be SRO only based on the basis documents required.

Need to ensure that all other distractors are truly incorrect. BANK Added lAW TS SAT an12009. 5 eR3 -Modified as discussed. F 2 S G2.2.43 Question appears to match the KIA. 22/97 Appears to be SRO only. As written the question is a little. confusing, may want to consider changing the format. NEW 5 eR3 -No change. ------1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E G2.2.37 Question appears to match KIA. 21/96 Appears to be SRO only based on the basis documents required. Need to ensure that all other distractors are truly incorrect. BANK Added lAW TS SAT an12009. S eR3 -Modified as discussed. F 2 S G2.2.43 Question appears to match the KIA. 22/97 Appears to be SRO only. As written the question is a little. confusing, may want to consider changing the format. NEW S eR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO UlEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X X U G2.3.15 Questions appears to match KIA. Not 23/98 sure it is SRO only. It appears that you are testing the purposes of the radiation monitors.

This is an RO knowledge item. Distractors B and D are not plausible. Why would anyone use the fuel building radiation monitor to determine anything on a Large Break LOCA? It also appears that mechanical damage is only used for the spent fuel pool. NEW CR3 -Wrote new question. F 2 X U G2.4.29 Question appears to match the KIA. 24/99 This question appears to be just the definition of a classification. Could be considered GET knowledge. Does not appear to be SRO knowledge. BANK (got second opinion from an additional examiner). Rewrite an 12009 CR3 -Replaced question. --1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X X U G2.3.15 Questions appears to match KIA. Not 23/98 sure it is SRO only. It appears that you are testing the purposes of the radiation monitors. This is an RO knowledge item. Distractors B and D are not plausible. Why would anyone use the fuel building radiation monitor to determine anything on a Large Break LOCA? It also appears that mechanical damage is only used for the spent fuel pool. NEW CR3 -Wrote new question. F 2 X U G2.4.29 Question appears to match the KIA. 24/99 This question appears to be just the definition of a classification. Could be considered GET knowledge. Does not appear to be SRO knowledge. BANK (got second opinion from an additional examiner). Rewrite anl2009 CR3 -Replaced question.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO UlEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X E G2.4.3 Question appears to match KIA. May not 25/100 be SRO. Why do you give the details of EOP-03 step 3.14. This is cuing. Question is very similar to #64 on the RO Exam. NEW Upon further review, question is SRO only. Removed teaching from the stem. Question SAT 8/4/2009.
S eR3 -Modified as discussed. I ----------------------------

5 Sats, >2'Unsats, and 8 Enhancements g 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partia I Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EJ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X E G2.4.3 Question appears to match KIA. May not 25/100 be SRO. Why do you give the details of EOP-03 step 3.14. This is cuing. Question is very similar to #64 on the RO Exam. NEW Upon further review, question is SRO only. Removed teaching from the stem. Question SAT 8/4/2009. S eR3 -Modified as discussed. 5 Sats, nUnsats, and 8 Enhancements g ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301 ROWritten Examination Review Worksheet FINAL Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 1. I 2., I 3. Psychometric Flaws LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) 6. 7. Q# Stem Icues I T/F I cred*1 Partial I JOb-I Minutia I #1 I Back-I Q= I SRO I utE! Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S Explanation Instructions [Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] IEnter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. IEnter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 -5 (easy -difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 -4 range are acceptable). Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.

One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if ajob content error is identified:

The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check guestions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met). ES-401, Rev. 9 Crystal River 2009-301 ROWritten Examination Review Worksheet FINAL Form ES-401-9 Q# 1. LOK (F/H) 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws LOD

5. Other 6. 7. (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S Instructions

[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. Enter the level of difficulty (LaD) of each question using a 1 -5 (easy -difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 -4 range are acceptable). Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.

One or more distractors is ( are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

7. At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 001 AA2.05 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and B may not be plausible.

What 1 procedure actions would be taken if MUV-31 was open (attempt to close MUV-31). NEW S Explained the plausibility of distractors A and B Question is SAT 8/13/2009 CR3 -No change. H 2 X U 003AK1.10 Question does not appear to match the KIA. The KIA is knowledge of the 2 operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to Dropped Control Rod: Definitions of core quadrant power tilt. This question is dealing with a mis-aligned control rod. BANK Licensee to change to dropped rod, will change power levels to match. And Verify that the correct technical Spec limit is the only correct answer. Will also run on simulator to verify indications. 8/13/2009 CR3 -Modified question as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 001 AA2.05 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and B may not be plausible.

What 1 procedure actions would be taken if MUV-31 was open (attempt to close MUV-31). NEW S Explained the plausibility of distractors A and B Question is SAT 8/13/2009 CR3 -No change. H 2 X U 003AK1.10 Question does not appear to match the KIA. The KIA is knowledge of the 2 operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to Dropped Control Rod: Definitions of core quadrant power tilt. This question is dealing with a mis-aligned control rod. BANK Licensee to change to dropped rod, will change power levels to match. And Verify that the correct technical Spec limit is the only correct answer. Will also run on simulator to verify indications. 8/13/2009 CR3 -Modified question as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TlF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEJ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 003K6.14 Question kind of matches the KJ A. Distractor B, is not plausible.

Are both oil lift 3 pumps for the B Rep always running when preparing to start the pump? Does the applicant have to make any assumptions? BANK S CR3 -Lowered RCS pressure to 1000# to make more plausible. Removed "electrically" from stem. RCP-1 B is the only RCP with 2 oil pumps. If a lift oil pump were to trip on any of the other RCPs then "A" distractor would be true. H 2 X U 004K2.06 Question does not appear to match KJ A. What eves instrumentation power supply 4 is being tested? MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). -Discussed changes to valve fails closed! manual control is not available, etc. Will review revised question. 8/13/2009 S CR3 -All distractors modified per discussion. , 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SAO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 003K6.14 Question kind of matches the KIA. Distractor S, is not plausible. Are both oil lift 3 pumps for the S Rep always running when preparing to start the pump? Does the applicant have to make any assumptions? BANK S CR3 -Lowered RCS pressure to 1000# to make more plausible. Removed "electrically" from stem. RCP-1 B is the only RCP with 2 oil pumps. If a lift oil pump were to trip on any of the other RCPs then "A" distractor would be true. H 2 X U 004K2.06 Question does not appear to match KIA. What eves instrumentation power supply 4 is being tested? MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified) . . Discussed changes to valve fails closedl manual control is not available, etc. Will review revised question. 8/13/2009 S CR3 -All distractors modified per discussion . .

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. I Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utEi Explanation i Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 005AK3.05 Question appears to match KIA. May want to add the word limits after DNBR and 5 LHR. Otherwise SAT. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).

eR3 -replaced "criteria is" with "limits are" H 2 X X E 005K2.01 Question kind of matches KIA, using a backwards logic. Distractor C may not be 6 plausible. Note in EOP 12 states not to use any procedures while in EOP except for AP 880, so why would someone pick distractor C? NEW S eR3 -No change. RO has to know of the existence of that NOTE in order to rule out "e" distractor.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 005AK3.05 Question appears to match KIA. May want to add the word limits after DNBR and 5 LHR. Otherwise SAT. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified).
CR3 -replaced "criteria is" with "limits are" H 2 X X E 005K2.01 Question kind of matches KIA, using a backwards logic. Distractor C may not be 6 plausible. Note in EOP 12 states not to use any procedures while in EOP except for AP 880, so why would someone pick distractor C? NEW S CR3 -No change. RO has to know of the existence of that NOTE in order to rule out "C" distractor.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO UJE/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 005KS.03 Question Kind of matches KIA. Not sure if testing 3 items is going to work (Le. 7 open/closed/heatup) to answer the question correctly you only have two know what two of the components will do, to narrow the correct answer down. BANK S CR3 -No change. Closed/closed and open/open valve positions not plausible.

That was my reason for needing 3 items. F 2 S OOSA2.10 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. Need to make sure that all of the 8 distractors are actually incorrect. NEW S CR3 -Deleted part of 1 st item in each distractor. Not needed. Per TS bases "C" is the only correct answer. H 2 S 006K5.04 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. 9 NEW S CR3-No change. ----1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 005KS.03 Question Kind of matches KIA. Not sure if testing 3 items is going to work (Le. 7 open/closed/heatup) to answer the question correctly you only have two know what two of the components will do, to narrow the correct answe r down. BANK S CR3 -No change. Closed/closed and open/open valve positions not plausible. That was my reason for needing 3 items. F 2 S OOSA2.10 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. Need to make sure that all of the 8 distractors are actually incorrect. NEW S CR3 -Deleted part of 1 st item in each distractor. Not needed. Per TS bases "C" is the only correct answer. H 2 S OOSK5.04 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT. 9 NEW S CR3-No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 007 A4.09 Not sure if the question meets the KIA. Are the RCDT parameters higher than 10 normal operating parameters?

It appears from your distractor analysis that they are, but with pressurizer level not changing (I understandtha level control is in automatic and would mask a leak of this magnitude) and all others beside the RS sump stable I need to verify that the RCDT parameters have changed from normal operating parameters. BANK S CR3 -No Change. RCDT pressure normally maintained less than 2 psig to ensure seal leakage is not routed to the RB sump. F 2 X E 007EA2.02 Question appears to match KIA. Not sure if C is plausible. Does EOP-02 ever direct 11 the operator to open these breakers? If not this is not plausible (lAW EOP-2.0) MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -Changed number of control rods stuck out. Breakers in distractor "C" may be . opened in the previous step of EOP-02. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 007 A4.09 Not sure if the question meets the KJ A. Are the RCDT parameters higher than 10 normal operating parameters? It appears from your distractor analysis that they are, but with pressurizer level not changing (I understand tha level control is in automatic and would mask a leak of this magnitude) and all others beside the RB sump stable I need to verify that the RCDT parameters have changed from normal operating parameters. BANK S CR3 -No Change. RCDT pressure normally maintained less than 2 psig to ensure seal leakage is not routed to the RB sump. F 2 X E 007EA2.02 Question appears to match KJ A. Not sure if C is plausible. Does EOP-02 ever direct 11 the operator to open these breakers? If not this is not plausible (lAW EOP-2.0) MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -Changed number of control rods stuck out. Breakers in distractor "C" may be opened in the previous step of EOP-02.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SAO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U OOSA 1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and 0 do not appear to be 12 plausible.

If NPSH is maintained why would YOL enter an LCO, and if NPSH is not maintained, why would you not enter the LCO? NEW Changed stem to start with conditions, and then changes to conditions. Will continue to work S/13/2009. CR3 -Modified per discussion. The S nitrogen overpressure on the tank is not an NPSH concern. H 2 S 00SAG2.1.23 Question appears to match KIA. Sat 13 NEW S CR3 -Changed "could/should" in stem to "would/will". M 1 S 008K4.02 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating. 14 BANK S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 00SA1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Distractors A and 0 do not appear to be 12 plausible. If NPSH is maintained why would you enter an LCO, and if NPSH is not maintained, why would you not enter the LCO? NEW Changed stem to start with conditions, and then changes to conditions. Will continue to work S/13/2009. CR3 -Modified per discussion. The S nitrogen overpressure on the tank is not an NPSH concern. H 2 S 00SAG2.1.23 Question appears to match KIA. Sat 13 NEW CR3 -Changed "could/should" in stem to S "would/will". M 1 S 008K4.02 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating. 14 BANK S CR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #f Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 1 S 009EK2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.

The cooldown rate should 15 be closer to the limit. Otherwise sat. BANK S CR3 -Changed excessive/acceptable to above/below TS limit to remove subjectivity. F 1 X U 010K5.01 Not sure this matches the KIA. What is the condition of fluid in PZR? We make no 16 mention of this. Not very discriminating. BANK Continue to work question to match KIA including operational implications. (consider general operating procedure actions) 8/13/2009 CR3 -Replaced question. H 2 S 011 EK3.07 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 17 NEW S CR3 -No change. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 1 S 009EK2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating. The cooldown rate should 15 be closer to the limit. Otherwise sat. BANK S CR3 -Changed excessive/acceptable to above/below TS limit to remove subjectivity. F 1 X U 010K5.01 Not sure this matches the KIA. What is the condition of fluid in PZR? We make no 16 mention of this. Not very discriminating. BANK Continue to work question to match KIA including operational implications. (consider general operating procedure actions) 8/13/2009 CR3 -Replaced question. H 2 S 011 EK3.07 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 17 NEW S CR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 1 S 012G2.4.6 Question kind of matches KIA. Low discriminating value. Otherwise SAT. 18 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 S 012K5.01 Question appears to match KIA. Top part of stem is not needed. Need to ensure that 19 b, c, and d are not correct. Otherwise SAT NEW S CR3 -Removed top part of stem. "B", "C" and "0" verified incorrect.

H 2 S 013K2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 20 BANK S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 015/017 AK1.05 Question appears to match KIA. 21 NEW S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SAO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 1 S 012G2.4.6 Question kind of matches KIA. Low discriminating value. Otherwise SAT. 18 NEW S eR3 -No change. F 2 S 012K5.01 Question appears to match KIA. Top part of stem is not needed. Need to ensure that 19 b, c, and d are not correct. Otherwise SAT NEW S eR3 -Removed top part of stem. "8", "C" and "0" verified incorrect. H 2 S 013K2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 20 BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 015/017 AK1.05 Question appears to match KIA. 21 NEW S eR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 015K3.01 Question appears to match KJ A. Add axial to the -6% imbalance in the stem. 22 Otherwise SAT (Why do they need a reference?

MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -Added "axial power" to stem. Removed reference, not needed to answer question. H 2 S 016A4.02 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT 23 BANK S CR3 -No change. ----_ .. _---1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 015K3.01 Question appears to match KIA. Add axial to the -6% imbalance in the stem. 22 Otherwise SAT (Why do they need a reference? MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -Added "axial power" to stem. Removed reference, not needed to answer question. H 2 S 016A4.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 23 BANK S CR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X U 017K5.02 Question kind of matches KIA. Although the applicant can correctly answer the 24 question and not match the KIA. The question has three items being tested in each distractor, 1. How many core exit thermocouples are used , 2. where does the subcooling inputs come from SPDS, and 3. if an inadequate cooling event is in progress.

An applicant need only know that SPDS is the input, and that 8 thermocouples are used and can answer this question without determining if the plant is subcooled, saturated, or superheated. Need to remove one of the items being tested to ensure that the KIA is being adequately tested. BANK Change to highest and average, and subcooled or saturated. 8/13/2009 CR3 -Modified question as discussed. --1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X X X U 017K5.02 Question kind of matches KIA. Although the applicant can correctly answer the 24 question and not match the KIA. The question has three items being tested in each distractor, 1. How many core exit thermocouples are used ,2. where does the subcooling inputs come from SPDS, and 3. if an inadequate cooling event is in progress. An applicant need only know that SPDS is the input, and that 8 thermocouples are used and can answer this question without determining if the plant is subcooled, saturated, or superheated. Need to remove one of the items being tested to ensure that the KIA is being adequately tested. BANK Change to highest and average, and subcooled or saturated. 811312009 CR3 -Modified question as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 022AK1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 25 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Use remain the same/throttled as one of the choices. NEW Will Make changes to a 2 and 2 format. S CR3 -Modified question as discussed.

F 2 S 022K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 26 NEW S eR3 -No change. M 2 S 025AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 27 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X U 022AK1.03 Question appears to match KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 25 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Use remain the same/throttled as one of the choices. NEW Will Make changes to a 2 and 2 format. S eR3 -Modified question as discussed. F 2 S 022K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 26 NEW S eR3 -No change. M 2 S 025AA2.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 27 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S eR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 026A 1.01 Question appears to match the KIA. What position are the BSV -3 &4 valves in with 28 out HPI activation?

Are these valves normally open or closed. I think one of the distractors (or two) should state closed if you think that someone might miss that a manual activation should have been implemented. Will discuss. NEW S CR3-Changed Band D distractors from "throttled" to "closed". F 2 X U 026AK3.02 If this is the equivalent of the CCW system then the question meets the KIA. 29 Reasons on Distractors C and D are not plausible. How would SW be a heat input to the RB? NEW Rewrite to include leakage from RB via the SW system as the correct reason. A.lso need a clearly wrong but plausible reason for the other distractor. Also add times with RBIC and SWT level in the stem. S CR3 -Modified as discussed. _. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E 026A 1.01 Question appears to match the KIA. What position are the SSV-3 &4 valves in with 28 out HPI activation? Are these valves normally open or closed. I think one of the distractors (or two) should state closed if you think that someone might miss that a manual activation should have been implemented. Will discuss. NEW S CR3-Changed Band 0 distractors from "throttled" to "closed". F 2 X U 026AK3.02 If this is the equivalent of the CCW system then the question meets the KIA. 29 Reasons on Distractors C and 0 are not plausible. How would SW be a heat input to the RS? NEW Rewrite to include leakage from RB via the SW system as the correct reason. Also need a clearly wrong but plausible reason for the other distractor. Also add times with RBIC and SWT level in the stem. S CR3 -Modified as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 027 AK3.04 Question appears to match the KIA. Change distractor C to read lower because all 30 pressurizer heaters must be manually reset to energize.

BANK S eR3 -No change. Two banks of heaters will automatically reset once level rises above 40". F 2 S 027K1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 31 NEW S eR3 -No change. F 2 X J1 028A2.02 Question as written meets only the S first part of the KIA. There are not any 32 procedure usage steps to control correct, or mitigate the consequences. The b part of the KIA must be met. NEW Not operationally valid for an RO, no actions in current procedures. Gerry to supply New KIA. NEW KIA Number 001A2.12 eR3 -New question written. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 X E 027 AK3.04 Question appears to match the KIA. Change distractor C to read lower because all 30 pressurizer heaters must be manually reset to energize. BANK S eR3 -No change. Two banks of heaters will automatically reset once level rises above 40". F 2 S 027K1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 31 NEW S eR3 -No change. F 2 X ;1 028A2.02 Question as written meets only the S first part of the KIA. There are not any 32 procedure usage steps to control correct, or mitigate the consequences. The b part of the KIA must be met. NEW Not operationally valid for an RO, no actions in current procedures. Gerry to supply New KIA. NEW KIA Number 001A2.12 eR3 -New question written.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S M 2 X U 029EA 1.12 Question kind of matches KIA. Can reactor trip breakers be manually opened? If 33 3305 and 3312 did not open from the control room, would it not be prudent to go to step 2.3? I am not sure that we should test ROs on what is in the cross-step document We should be testing them on the procedure being used. Will Discuss. What is incorrect about distractor 8? NEW Determined that the question does meet the KIA. Licensee will look at changing to remove so much of the information in the distractors to simplify the answer. eR3 -No change yet. H 2 S 033A 1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 34 BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 034G2.2.40 Question appears to match KIA. SAT. Reference OK. TS-3.7.15 35 NEW S eR3 -No change. 1-2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S M 2 X U 029EA1.12 Question kind of matches KIA. Can reactor trip breakers be manually opened? If 33 3305 and 3312 did not open from the control room, would it not be prudent to go to step 2.3? I am not sure that we should test ROs on what is in the cross-step document.
We should be testing them on the procedure being used. Will Discuss. What is incorrect about distractor B? NEW Determined that the question does meet the KIA. Licensee will look at changing to remove so much of the information in the distractors to simplify the answer. eR3 -No change yet. H 2 S 033A1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 34 BANK S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 034G2.2.40 Question appears to match KIA. SAT. Reference OK. TS-3.7.15 35 NEW S CR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 038EG2.1.28 Question appears to match KIA. Isn't C always correct? Will discuss otherwise 36 SAT. NEW S CR3 -No chanSJe. C is correct only if ADVs are open. F 1 S 039K3.05 Question appears to match KIA. Low discriminatory value. Otherwise SAT. 37 BANK S CR3 -No change. H 2 E 041 K6.03 Question appears to match KIA. how the failure affects Turbine control and TBV 38 should be included.

i.e. ICS will lower header pressure and the plant will trip if no actions are taken. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -No change. Plant will not trip. Only controlling setpoint for turbine control will be 15 psig higher. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #f Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 038EG2.1.28 Question appears to match KIA. Isn't C always correct? Will discuss otherwise 36 SAT. NEW 5 CR3 -No change. C is correct only if ADVs are open. F 1 S 039K3.05 Question appears to match KIA. Low discriminatory value. Otherwise SAT. 37 BANK 5 CR3 -No change. H 2 E 041 K6.03 Question appears to match KIA. how the failure affects Turbine control and TBV 38 should be included. i.e. ICS will lower header pressure and the plant will trip if no actions are taken. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). 5 CR3 -No change. Plant will not trip. Only controlling setpoint for turbine control will be 15 psig higher.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LCD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KJA Only S F 2 S 054AA 1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 39 BANK S eR3 -No change. F 2 S 055EK3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 40 BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 056AA 1.05 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT 41 eR3 -Deleted some fluff from stem. Not S needed to answer question.

42 F 2 S 056Kl.03 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK 5 eR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #f Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S 054AA 1.01 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT 39 BANK S eR3 -No change. F 2 S 055EK3.02 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT 40 BANK S eR3 -No change . .. H 2 S 056AA 1.05 Question appears to match the KIA. SAT 41 eR3 -Deleted some fluff from stem. Not S needed to answer question. 42 F 2 S 056K1.03 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT BANK S eR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 058AK1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 43 NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 059A3.04 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 44 NEW S CR3 a No change. H 2 S 059K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. Might want to add directly cause a EFW 45 actuation.

Otherwise SAT NEW CR3 -Does not directly cause and EFW actuation. Valve stroking causes the booster pump to trip which in turn causes the main FW pumps to trip which then actuates EFIC. S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 058AK1.01 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 43 NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 059A3.04 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 44 NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 059K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. Might want to add directly cause a EFW 45 actuation. Otherwise SAT NEW CR3 -Does not directly cause and EFW actuation. Valve stroking causes the booster pump to trip which in turn causes the main FW pumps to trip which then actuates EFIC. S CR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S 061 AG2.1.12 Question appears to match KIA. SAT Question was listed as CIA, but appears to 46 be a memory level question.

NEW S CR3-No change in question content. Changed CIA to MEM. H 2 S 061 K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 47 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 062A2.16 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 48 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -No change. 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FfH) (1-5) Stem Cues TfF Credo Partial Job-Minutia #f Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S 061 AG2.1.12 Question appears to match KIA. SAT Question was listed as C/ A, but appears to 46 be a memory level question. NEW S CR3-No change in question content. Changed CIA to MEM. H 2 S 061 K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 47 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -No change. H 2 S 062A2.16 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 48 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 063A3.01 Question appear to match KIA. Distractor D may be considered a correct 49 statement.

For the light to go out batt volts must be less than 72 volts, if it is less than 72 volts, and the battery charger is till aligned then it too would be less than 72 volts, and battery charger voltage would be less than 124 volts. Will discuss NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 E 064G2.4.45 Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 50 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. NEW S CR3 -Modified to test only 2 items per distractor.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 063A3.01 Question appear to match KIA. Distractor D may be considered a correct 49 statement.

For the light to go out batt volts must be less than 72 volts, if it is less than 72 volts, and the battery charger is till aligned then it too would be less than 72 volts, and battery charger voltage would be less than 124 volts. Will discuss NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 E 064G2.4.4S Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, and 50 the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. NEW S CR3 -Modified to test only 2 items per distractor.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 0# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-0= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 064K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. However, the first two distractors are electrical 51 trips and very few electrical trips will trip the engine. If the imbalance is enough, enough torque could be generated to damage the engine, and the engine would trip then. Would this make any of these correct? Need to work on this question some to make it more clear and tight. NEW S CR3 -Only other electrical engine trip is the 87DG -generator differential OC. Changed distractors A and B to relay actuations that will trip the breaker, but not the engine. H 2 E 06SAG2.4.8 Question appears.to match KIA. Fire protection is only listed in one distractor 52 along with the SSO procedure, and AP -880 with a fire in place why would I not pick this one. Need to add Fire protection to one of the other choices as well. May also want to Take EOP 12 out of some of the distractors.

Will discuss. NEW S CR3-AP-880 listed in 2 distractors. Added .. names of procedures to stem and removed* from distractors.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 E 064K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. However, the first two distractors are electrical 51 trips and very few electrical trips will trip the engine. If the imbalance is enough, enough torque could be generated to damage the engine, and the engine would trip then. Would this make any of these correct? Need to work on this question some to make it more clear and tight. NEW S CR3 -Only other electrical engine trip is the 87DG -generator differential oe. Changed distractors A and B to relay actuations that will trip the breaker, but not the engine. H 2 E 06SAG2.4.8 Question appears to match KIA. Fire protection is only listed in one distractor 52 along with the SSO procedure, and AP -880 with a fire in place why would I not pick this one. Need to add Fire protection to one of the other choices as well. May also want to Take EOP 12 out of some of the distractors.

Will discuss. NEW S CR3-AP-880 listed in 2 distractors. Added names of procedures to stem and removed from distractors.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ 8ack-Q= SRO u/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 068K4.01 Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, 53 and the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Will discuss. S NEW eR3 -No change. F 2 S 073A4.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating.

54 BANK 5 eR3 -No change. H 2 S 074EA2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Very little discriminating value. Reference is 55 okay. BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 076G2.4.8 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 56 NEW S eR3 -No change. ---1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO UlEi Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 E 068K4.01 Question appears to match the KIA. Again the question is testing three items, 53 and the applicant need only know two of the items to arrive at a correct answer. Need to lower the number of items being tested to two. Will discuss. S NEW eR3 -No change. F 2 S 073A4.03 Question appears to match KIA. Not very discriminating. 54 BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 074EA2.03 Question appears to match KIA. Very little discriminating value. Reference is 55 okay. BANK S eR3 -No change. H 2 S 076G2.4.8 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 56 NEW S eR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 077 AK2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 57 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 S 078K1.04 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT If the high temperature is 125°F will the 58 compressor ever get to 130°F? May want to change this number. BANK S CR3 -Slightly modified all temperatures.

Changed B distractor to CDP-1 A from FWP-2A for plausibility. H 2 E 103A2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. What is wrong with diverse containment isolation? 8 59 could be argued as correct. NEW S CR3 -No change. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S H 2 S 077 AK2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT 57 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 S 078K1.04 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT If the high temperature is 125°F will the 58 compressor ever get to 130°F? May want to change this number. BANK S CR3 -Slightly modified all temperatures. Changed B distractor to CDP-1 A from FWP-2A for plausibility. H 2 E 103A2.03 Question kind of matches KIA. What is wrong with diverse containment isolation? 8 59 could be argued as correct. NEW S CR3 -No change.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 U 103K1.01 Question does not meet the KIA. The KIA is asking for the physical connections 60 and/or cause effect relationships between the reactor building and the containment cooling system, not the containment spray system. Unless the only cooling for the RS is containment spray) BANK Develop a question on RB coolers/fans.

Cause and effect. 8/13/2009 CR3 -Replaced question. H 2 S BW/A02AG2.2.12 Question Kind of matches KIA. SAT 61 NEW 5 eR3 -No change. H 2 E BW/A06AK1.3 Question kind of matches KIA. 15 there anything wrong with using MUV-31 62 locally? If not you should state in the stem lAW AP-990. BANK 5 CR3 -Added lAW AP-990 to stem. --1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 U 103K1.01 Question does not meet the KIA. The KIA is asking for the physical connections 60 and/or cause effect relationships between the reactor building and the containment cooling system, not the containment spray system. Unless the only cooling for the RS is containment spray) BANK Develop a question on RB coolers/fans. Cause and effect. 8/13/2009 CR3 -Replaced question. H 2 S BW/A02AG2.2.12 Question Kind of matches KIA. SAT 61 NEW S CR3 -No change. H 2 E BW/A06AK1.3 Question kind of matches KIA. Is there anything wrong with using MUV-31 62 locally? If not you should state in the stem lAW AP-990. BANK S CR3 -Added lAW AP-990 to stem.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U BW/A07AK2.1 Question may not meet KIA. Asked for another opinion. Determined that 63 question did not meet KIA. CR3 -Wrote new question.

H 2 E BW/E04EA2.1 Question appears to match KIA. Very similar to # 25 on the SRO examination. 64 BANK S CR3 -No change. Compared with SRO #25 on 8/13/09 and determined to be SAT. F 2 X X X )( BW/E08EA1.1 Question kind of matches KIA. Some cueing in stem. Distractors Band 0 do 65 not appear to be plausible. How could SW temperatures exceed design limits if the coolers were degraded / fouled? Which ONE of the following describes the reason for ensuring only 1 ES selected RB cooling unit is running in low speed per EOP-8A ... MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -Modified stem slightly. Determined SAT with this change on 8-13-09. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X U BW/A07AK2.1 Question may not meet KIA. Asked for another opinion. Determined that 63 question did not meet KIA. eR3 -Wrote new question. H 2 E BW/E04EA2.1 Question appears to match KIA. Very similar to # 25 on the SRO examination. 64 BANK S CR3 -No change. Compared with SRO #25 on 8/13/09 and determined to be SAT. F 2 X X X Y BW/E08EA1.1 Question kind of matches KIA. Some cueing in stem. Distractors Band D do 65 not appear to be plausible. How could SW temperatures exceed design limits if the coolers were degraded / fouled? Which ONE of the following describes the reason for ensuring only 1 ES selected RB cooling unit is running in low speed per EOP-SA ... MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). S CR3 -Modified stem slightly. Determined SAT with this change on 8-13-09.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #/ Back-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.1.3 Question appears to match KIA. Distractor 0 is not plausible.

What kind of 66 turnover between the OAG and BOP is required? Need to add this to make better choices. (better discriminating value) NEW Gerry to write new distractor for D. 8-19-09 CR3-H 2 X E G2.1.36 Question appears to match KIA. Distractor C does not make sense. Cease 67 insertion of fuel assembly? What will the crew do with it? Stop and hold it in place. Please explain why this is plausible. BANK 5 CR3 -Modified C distractor. F 2 S G2.1.40 Question appears to match KIA. SAT 68 MOD (need to see original question to 5 ensure it is modified). CR3 -No change 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.1.3 Question appears to match K/ A. Distractor 0 is not plausible. What kind of 66 turnover between the OAC and BOP is required? Need to add this to make better choices. (better discriminating value) NEW Gerry to write new distractor for D. 8-19-09 CR3-H 2 X E G2.1.36 Question appears to match K/ A. Distractor C does not make sense. Cease 67 insertion of fuel assembly? What will the crew do with it? Stop and hold it in place. Please explain why this is plausible. BANK 5 CR3 -Modified C distractor. F 2 S G2.1.40 Question appears to match K/ A. SAT 68 MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified). 5 CR3 -No change

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (FIH) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-0= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.2.20 Question kind of matches KIA. Not sure if distractor D is plausible.

Did not see in AI-500 69 where this was an option at any time. BANK S eR3 -No change. F 2 S G2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. Place wide range and narrow range in front of RS 70 sump level (Le. wide range RS sump level and ... ) Otherwise SAT. BANK S eR3 -Modified as requested. F 2 X U G2.3.11 May not meet KIA. How are operators I plant controlling the release? Asked for a 71 second opinion. Distractors Sand C do not appear to be plausible. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified. Will write a containment release (RMA 1) that does not totally isolate. eR3 -Modified as discussed. -1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws s. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-S) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SAO utE! Explanation Focus Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 X E G2.2.20 Question kind of matches KIA. Not sure if distractor D is plausible. Did not see in AI-500 69 where this was an option at any time. BANK 5 eR3 -No change. F 2 S G2.2.38 Question appears to match KIA. Place wide range and narrow range in front of RB 70 sump level (Le. wide range RB sump level and ... ) Otherwise SAT. BANK 5 eR3 -Modified as requested. F 2 X U G2.3.11 May not meet KIA. How are operators / plant controlling the release? Asked for a 71 second opinion. Distractors Band C do not appear to be plausible. MOD (need to see original question to ensure it is modified. Will write a containment release (RMA1) that does not totally isolate. eR3 -Modified as discussed.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 8ack-Q= SRO U/EI Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S G2.3.12 Question appears to match K/ A. SAT 72 BANK S CR3 -Modified stem to remove fluff. No change in intent. F 2 S 2.3.14 Question appears to match K/ A. SAT Not very discriminating.

73 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 X U 2.4.35 Question kind of matches KIA. Distractors B &0 are not plausible. Do the 74 480V switchgear rooms have DC knife switches located in them? BANK Will work on another angle to make better distractors. CR3 -Removed "knife switch" from stem and modified C and D distractors. --1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia #1 Back-Q= SRO utE! Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA Only S F 2 S G2.3.12 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT 72 BANK S CR3 -Modified stem to remove fluff. No change in intent. F 2 S 2.3.14 Question appears to match KJ A. SAT Not very discriminating. 73 NEW S CR3 -No change. F 2 X U 2.4.35 Question kind of matches KJ A. Distractors B &D are not plausible. Do the 74 480V switchgear rooms have DC knife switches located in them? BANK Will work on another angle to make better distractors. CR3 -Removed "knife switch" from stem and modified C and 0 distractors.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia Focus Dist. Link F 2 75 40 Sats, J4 Unsats, and 21 Enhancements 10 #1 8ack-units ward 5. Other 6. 7. Q= SRO U/EI Explanation KIA Only S E G2.4.8 Question appears to match KIA. Could the shift manager also be the procedure director?

NEW S eR3 -Not unless aU the other SROs were unavailable. The SM could, but lAW AI-505, he would not due to other duties. Generic Comments: All bank or modified questions should have the answers rotated from original (i.e. if the answer was originally A, swap the correct answer to B, C, or D. Need to see the original questions for all modified questions.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia Focus Dist. Link F 2 75 40 Sats, J4 Unsats, and 21 Enhancements 10 #1 Back-units ward 5. Other 6. 7. Q= SRO U/EI Explanation KIA Only S E G2.4.8 Question appears to match KIA. Could the shift manager also be the procedure director?

NEW S eR3 -Not unless all the other SROs were unavailable. The SM could, but lAW AI-50S, he would not due to other duties. Generic Comments: All bank or modified questions should have the answers rotated from original (i.e. if the answer was originally A, swap the correct answer to B, C, or D. Need to see the original questions for all modified questions. ES-403, Rev. 9 Facility: Crystal River 3 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam: 09/22/2009 Item Description

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on theSRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 6. are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants

a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor

(*) Form ES-403-1 Exam Level: RO/SRO Initials a b c MA IJ /i/{ f/ 9t :/ f , 1#/, (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required . . . ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist I Facility: Crystal River 3 Date of Exam: 09/22/2009

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Item Description Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on theSRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature

a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor

(*) Form ES-403-1 Exam Level: RO/SRO I Initials a b c 1/ If Date (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist J:1:3 Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO Item Descri tion 1. 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature

a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor

(*) Initials a b Date c (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired. ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ( ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facili

lt3 Date of Exam:

Exam Level: RO 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Item Descri tion Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature

a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor

(*) Initials a b Date c (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired. ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}

ML093270191

Text

= s.Ardi?.£7

Navigation menu

Search