ML12242A348

University of California - Irvine: Annual Report for July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012

ML12242A348
Person / Time
Site:	University of California - Irvine
Issue date:	08/17/2012
From:	Miller G E University of California - Irvine
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML12242A348 (37)

Text

UNIVERSHTY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE SANTA BARBARA -SANTA CRUZ George E. Miller IRVINE, CA 92697-2025 Senior Lecturer Emeritus (949) 824-6649 Department of Chemistry and FAX: (949) 824-6082 or (949) 824-8571 Director, Nuclear Reactor Facility Internet:

GEMILLER@uci.edu August 17,2012 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Docket 50-326: License R-1 16 Annual Report Submittal, Tech Spec 6.7f Gentlemen:

Please find enclosed three (3) copies of the annual report for the UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility, covering the period July 1st 2011 through June 30th 2012. We regret that this report is delayed owing to our awaiting clarification on dosimetry results from the vendor.Electronic copies are being provided as indicated below.Thank you.Sincerely, George E. Miller Reactor Supervisor Cc.,w/enc

(*electronic copies)American Nuclear Insurance, 95 Glastonbury Blvd, Glastonbury CT 06033, Policy NF-176 Dean of Physical Sciences, Ken Janda*Greg Schoenebeck, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

• Spyros Traiforos, Project Manager, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

• Reactor Operations Committee Members, UCI 00Do IPJO-U. C. IRVINTE Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report for July 1st, 2011 to June 3 0 th "2012 Facility License R- 116 Docket 50-326 Prepared in Accordance writh Part 6.7f of the Facility Technical Specifications by Dr. George E. Miller, Reactor Supervisor and Jonathan Wallick, Staff Nuclear Science Engineer, SRO UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page I Section 1. Operations Narrative Summary .I Operation of this facility supports UCI research and education programs in the Department of Chemistry (CHEM) and the Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Science (ChEMS).Research is being conducted in application of radioisotopes as tracers and radiochemical analytical and separation techniques including applications to nuclear waste separations (ChEMS).Reactor utilization, apart from operator training and maintenance, is for analytical sample irradiation and production of isotopic tracers. Analysis samples come from diverse origins related to forensic science, fossil fuels, geochemistry, art. and archaeological studies, chemical separations in nuclear fuel cycle experiments, chemical synthesis, industrial quality control, enzyme studies, trace element pollution studies, etc. The reactor is also used in class work by undergraduates learning tracer and activation analysis techniques using small quantities of short-lived activated materials.

Enrollment in the Fall Quarter 2011 laboratory course in Radioisotope Techniques using the facility was 44 students with 3 graduate teaching assistants, who also learned these techniques.

A three-week intensive summer course in reactor operations was offered in July, 2011 for 8 individuals.

A two-week repeat of this course is planned for July 2012.Use is also made of the facility by other educational institutions, both for research and for visits/tours.

A modest Nuclear Science Outreach program (NSOP) using UCI students to present talks and a laboratory to middle and high school classes has been continued.

This program has also involved tours, class demonstrations, and analyses of samples submitted by faculty. In this period, NSOP received no direct financial support.A grant from the Department of Energy was awarded to enable refurbishment of some auxiliary equipment (continuous air monitor samplers, automatic sample changer) and construction of a sample irradiation loop for flowing liquids, and a bum-up fuel element monitor instrument.

Operations have continued at the increased level experienced last year. Criticality was achieved for 161.13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br />, and the total energy generated was equivalent to 85.1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> at full steady state power. 129 separate experiments were performed, and over 2200 samples were irradiated (sometimes multiple samples are included in a single capsule and are not always separately logged).5 moderate level mixed isotope shipments were made, all Yellow II category.

Two low level test pulse operations have been performed to assess current instrumentation ability. Three 50.59 changes were approved this year: (i) shorting the terminals on relays 18 and 21 in the control console, (ii)reduction of the air pressure of the fast transient rod from 85 psig to 50 psig, (iii) replacement of a 220 ohm, 2 watt resistor, with 220 ohm. 5 watt resistor.

In addition, a new pumping system for ground water adjacent to the reactor tank was installed.

No unusual surveillance results/activities were conducted during this period.A routine NRC inspection was carried out on December 1 2 th to the 1 4 th of 2011, resulting in two Notices of Violation, both of which have been corrected and reported to the NRC as having been corrected.

An NRC non-routine inspection was carried out from March 140 -1 5 th 2012. No Notices of Violation were received regarding anything at the facility.

In 2011-12, Reactor Operations Committee meetings were held on Sept 7th 2011 and March 7th 2012 in accordance with Technical Specification schedule requirements.

No follow-ups or incidents have been forthcoming regarding security or emergency response.A review of the Emergency Plan was carried out by key personnel on May 4th 2012. As a result wording changes were made to upgrade the E-Plan according to changes made in the UCI Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. UCI is now relying more on contractors to carry out recovery tasks. OCFA remains the primary response team with their HAXMAT group. A training exercise was conducted May 9th 2012 for the 4 SRO's on site to review procedures in response to a CAM alarm. A training exercise involving all qualified SROs was administered on June 1 1 th.- 2012.testing knowledge of high radiation casualty procedures.

An exercise/training is scheduled to be held UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 2 July 2 5 th, 2012 for the UCI EH&S radiological personnel, Orange County Fire Authority, and reactor operators related to response to a laboratory radiation spill event involving personnel injury.Inspections/audits continue to be conducted quarterly by the Radiation Protection staff of EH&S at UCI. These have identified that frequency schedules have been properly maintained, and results continue to show absence of significant levels of contamination or personnel exposure.Operator examinations during the year (February 2012) resulted in the licensing of 1 new individual as an SRO, and 2 RO's. As of June 30th 2012, 5 SRO's and 2 RO's were active.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 3 Section 2. Data Tabulations for the Period July 1st. 2011 to June 30th. 2012 TABLE I.Experiment Approvals on file Experiments performed (including repeats)Samples irradiated Energy generated this period (Megawatt hours)Total, 69 element core = 127.0>74 element core = 1391.0 Total energy generated since initial criticality Pulse operation this period Total reactor pulses to 6/30/2012 129 2264 21.27 1518.0 Mwh 2 980 Hours critical this period Total hours critical to date Inadvertent scrams or unplanned shutdowns or events at power Visitors to reactor -as individuals or in tour groups -Maximum dosimeter recorded for visitors -all less than Visiting researchers (Temporary Self Indicating Dosimeters)

Maximum exposure recorded at one visit Visiting researchers (Thermoluminescent Dosimeters)

Students and teaching assistants in class, badged Exposures reported for quarter (range: 0-10 mrem) average Isotope Shipments this period (mixed act'n products = 0.9 p-curies total)TABLE II Reactor Core Status 6/30/12 (core configuration unchanged 161.13 8851.3 7 238 0.2 mrem 28 3.3 mrem 30 47 0.25 mrem 5 from 6/30/10)Fuel elements in core (including 2 fuel followers)

Fuel elements in storage (reactor tank -used)Fuel elements unused (4 instrumented elements + 1 element + 1 FFCR)Graphite reflector elements in core Graphite reflector elements in reactor tank storage Water filled fuel element positions Experimental facilities in core positions Non-fuel control rods Total core positions accounted for Core excess, cold, no xenon (as of 6/28/2012)

Control rod worths (calibrated 10/4/20111)

REG $2.70 SHIM $3.55 ATR $1.72 FTR $0.65 Total: $8.62 Maximum possible pulse insertion (calculated)

Maximum peak power recorded (no pulse operation during this period)Maximum peak temperature recorded in pulse (B-ring)82 25 6 34 0 5 4 2 127$2.42$2.37-Mw 0 UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 4 Section 3.Inadvertent Scrams, Unplanned Shutdowns.

Events at Power TABLE III.Date Time Power Type and Cause 2011 07/18 16:39 -2.5 w 07/19 16:55 -25 w 07/28 14:42 2.5kw Linear scram. Auto ranging malfunctioned while switching down.skipping past the proper range and resulting in a 106% scram in the 750 mW range. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.Linear scram. Auto ranging feature failed to operate in time to keep up with rate of power increase.

Operators warned to use longer periods.SRO operator.

Restart authorized by alternate SRO. *Linear scram. Auto ranging feature failed to operate in time to keep up with rate of slowed rate of power increase.

SRO Operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.10/04 15:50 -25 mw Linear scram. Instrument left in Manual mode in the 25 mw range.Operator error. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.10/06 17:04 191 kw During power calibration, unexpected Linear scran. Adjustment made to WRLM instrument resulted in second scram at 17:19, Additional adjustment remedied problem. SRO Operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.2012 3/15 9:07 -25 kw Linear scram. Auto ranging feature failed to function when switching from the 25 kw range to the 75 kw range: Trainee .operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012P Page 5 Section 4 Maintenance and Surveillance and Other Incidents The following non-routine maintenance/surveillance activities were carried out during this period.Any reactor operation related items have been included above and are not repeated here.2011 October 5 th 2012 February 1 3 th February 21st February 2 7 th May 17th Power calibration run at 200 kilowatts indicated power (WRLM). Several SCRAMs occurred while making adjustments to the Full Power Gain Adjust on the WRLM instrument.

Proper calibration was achieved and the spurious SCRAM behavior was negated.Reactor Control Console Key switch had maintenance performed to alleviate problems maintaining proper contact. A different set of contacts in better condition on the same wafer of the switch was placed in used and proper contact was achieved.Fast Transient Rod failed to withdraw from the core. Upon further inspection, connecting rod attached to the control rod had uncoupled from the connector located on the rod's drive due to a shearing and stripping of the threads. The connections were re-machined to previous specifications and operating pressure of the FTR in steady state mode was reduced to 50 +/- 5 psig, as documented in a 50.59 change. The repair was successful and performance has been verified to meet previous operational and technical requirements.

Shim rod failed to move upon initial start up of the day. Troubleshooting revealed a 22071 2W resistor had developed an open fault in the rod drive circuitry.

Replacement was made with a 220f2, 5W resistor, documented in a 50.59 change. Another rod drive had the same failure in 1987 and underwent the same repair. Rod drive was repaired and reinstalled successfully, meeting previous operational and technical requirements.

A sample being irradiated in the Delayed Neutron System (Fast Transfer System)broke open on the counting station side of the system. Sample contained 400 mL solution of 320 jtg of Uranium-238, resulting in contamination of the DNS/FTS.Decontamination was carried out by disassembling all parts of the DNS/FTS, including the core terminus that had been in use at the time of contamination, and proceeding to decontaminate with deionized water. Decontamination successful and repair affected to the DNS/FTS, preventing further sample breaches in the future.Performance evaluated to put back in operation.

UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 6 Section 5 Facility Changes and Special Experiments Approved Three 10 CFR 50.59 changes have been implemented during the course of the last year. The first change involved shorting the terminals on relays 18 and 21 in the reactor control console in order to make them available as spares, as they had served no purpose in the console beforehand.

The second change was the reduction in operating pressure of the Fast Transient Rod to reduce the mechanical stresses placed on the rod. which is suspected to be a root cause of the rod's failure earlier in the year.The third change was for the SHIM rod's electrical control system, which had a failed 220 ohm, 2 watt resistor.

The resistor was replaced with a 220 ohm. 5 watt resistor.

An identical replacement had been successfully performed on another rod drive in 1987.No special or unusual experiments were approved or carried out.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 201 1-2012 Page 7 Section 6. Radioactive Effluent Release.(a) Gases.The major direct release to the environs is Argon-41 produced during normal operations.

Very small amounts of other gases may be released from irradiated materials in experiments.

Releases are computed based on original measurements at point of origin within the facility and taking only dilution into account. Since much of the release is from operation of the pneumatic transfer system for samples, this is a conservative estimate in that assumption is made that all use of the PT is at full steady state power level (250 kW) when, in fact, considerable use is with the reactor at a lower power level. In view of the small numbers involved, and the fact that an integrated dose cheek is provided by an environmental dosimeter (CaSO 4-Dy) hanging directly in the exhaust at the point of stack discharge, it is considered unnecessary to provide further checks of these estimates.

The dosimeter data confirm that an individual standing directly in the exhaust flow for one year would receive an additional submersion dose from the exhaust less than the reliability limit of the dosimeters, or less than 20 mrem per year. The dosimeter data are presented separately in Section 7, Table IV. Over the years that data have been collected, the accumulated exposure at the exhaust locations have been lower than for "control" points because of lower masses of concrete structures in the vicinity.

In fact the data have been consistently at 20-25 mnrem per year below background level, so confidence of exposure less than 5 mrem over background seems possible.Release estimates based on operational parameters are as follows: (1) Operation of pneumatic transfer system (7/1/1 1-6/30/12):

a. Minutes of operation:

329 minutes b. Release rate assumed: 6.0 x 10-8 microcuries/mL

c. Flow rate of exhaust air: 1.2 x 10 8 mL/min d. Dilution factor: 0.01 Total release computed: (a x b x c x d) = 2.4 x 101 microcuries (2) Release from pool surface (7/1/11-6/30/12):

a. Total hours of operation at full power (Effective Full Power Hours) = 85.1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> b. Release rate assumed: 1.0 x 10-8 microcuries/mL

c. Flow rate of exhaust air: 1.2 x 108 mL/min d. Dilution factor: 0.01 Total release computed: (a x 60 x b x c x d) = 1.6 x 100 microcuries

e. Total of (1) and (2) emission in 1 year = 1.2 x 102 microcuries

f. Total effluent released in 1 year (525960 minutes/yr.

x c x d) = 6.3 x 1011 mL Concentration averaged over 12 months (d/e) = -< 1.9 x 10-10 microcuries/mL

-9 Since 2 x 10 microcuries/mL provides an annual exposure for constant immersion of 10 mrem, this corresponds to < 1.0 mrem potential additional radiation exposure to an individual standing breathing in the effluent stack for the entire year.Exhaust is diluted by a factor of 100 before release and the mixed plume is released at -100 feet above the roof level (200 feet above surrounding ground).UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 8 (b) Liquids and Solids.Liquid and solid wastes from utilization of by-product materials are disposed through a university contract.

Waste is transferred to the custody of UCI Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S). Disposals to this custody are given below. It is important to note that activity values are estimated at the time of transfer to EH&S control. Since few shipments are being made from campus, decay to negligible levels occurs for all medium-lived radionuclides.

Teaching course items (used for training in liquid scintillation counting techniques) may be a mixture of reactor generated byproducts and purchased materials (exclusively 1 4 C and 3m).DRY WASTES: Three transfers of 2 cubic foot containers of dry waste were disposed during this period (7/1/11 through 6/30/12) estimated at a total quantity in 6 cu ft of 8.72 microcuries of mixed activation products (measured as 6°Co equivalent at time of transfer).

LIQUIDS: One transfer of 500 mL of liquid waste was made this year. Content of the transfer was 320 p~g of U-238 dissolved in 500 mL of deionized water. No 1 4 C was disposed or purchased this year.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 9 Section 7.Environmental Surveillance.

Calcium Sulfate/Dysprosium thermoluminescent dosimeters are in place at 12 locations around the UCI Campus for environmental monitoring purposes.

Starting July 1 2004, these are provided by Global Dosimetry Solutions (GDS), Costa Mesa, California.

The GDS packs have three chips in each pack which are averaged for exposure recording.

GDS runs multiple control samples in addition to the locations listed below. All dosimeters are housed in small metal lock-boxes (except for locations 10 and 12). The table below lists the locations.

An additional dosimeter has been located in Engineering Tower, Room 521 (#12), for a total of 12.Routine contamination surveys consisting of wipe tests and G-M surveys have shown mostly a "clean" facility with significant, removable contamination only in areas coming into direct contact with samples removed from the reactor, and on sample handling tools. Trash is surveyed before disposal and not disposed unless found to be free of removable and fixed contamination.

Table of Locations for Environmental Dosimeter Packs.1. South Reactor Facility Perimeter 2. West Reactor Facility Perimeter 3. North Reactor Facility Perimeter 4. Reactor Facility Main Air Exhaust 5. Rowland Hall. First Floor Hallway Over Reactor Facility 6. McGaugh Hall Top Floor 7. Langson Library Top Floor 8. Reines Hall Top Floor 9. Reactor Facility Emergency Exhaust Duct 10. On-campus Housing 11. Rowland Hall Building Fume Hood Exhaust Duct 12. Engineering Tower Room 521 UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 10 TABLE IV.Environmental Dosimery Data.2011-2012 Average Total Exposures in mrem (including "control background")

Location.1. S. Facility perimeter 2. W. Facility perimeter 3. N Facility perimeter 4. Facility main air exhaust 5. Hallway over facility 6. McGaugh Hall top floor 7. Langson Library top floor 8. Reines Hall top floor 9. Facility emer .exh.10. On-campus housing 11 Facility fume hood exh.12 Engineering Tower 521 Background control (GDS)Quarter Annual Prior 2/11 3/11 4/11 1/12 Total 2011/12 24 35 26 28 113 22 29 24 29 104 23 32 27 31 113 19 25 21 26 91 19 27 23 27 96 21 28 24 28 101 26 3, 3 28 D33 120 24 30 26 30 110 18 24 21 25 88 18 26 21 27 92 16 24 22 26 89 18 28 22 26 84 23 31 25 32 111.Totals 2010/1 110 109 115 101 97 107 122 113 100 100 117 ar Excess(11-12) over control mr 1 ANNUAL+2-7+2-20-15-10+9-1-23-19-22-27 0 Discussion Raw data is presented here, along with controls and prior year comparisons.

Within this range, the data vary with significant consistency.

Locations 1, 3. and 9 are usually the highest, 10 the lowest.Data for this year reflects several issues: " Location 7 is on the top floor of a large building and may experience greater cosmic flux, as well as concrete releases.* Location 3 is on a heavy concrete wall." Location 1 is a hallway with an extremely low occupancy rate. (See additional note below).* In spite of increased operations, levels remain statistically within range of previous year.Exposure estimated to a single individual in an uncontrolled area at this facility is still very minimal.Locations 1 and 2 are in hallways with extremely minimal occupancy or travel, especially since security policy is to maintain permanently locked doors to the hallways on this floor level (access only to individuals with building keys). The rooms overhead (location

4) are casually occupied by very few individuals (one or two at the most) in the space above the reactor core. The air released from the facility/building (measured by locations

1. 5, #6 and #7) continues to give no detectable exposure above background.

Over many years, the data at each specific location has shown remarkable consistency.

The net conclusion is that, within precision of measurement, and compared to distant control areas (numbers 9 and 10), we are operating with very minimal levels (within statistical error of zero) of potential (full 24/7 occupancy) public exposure over normal background levels.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 11 Section 8. Radiation Exposure to Personnel.

Personnel exposure data are summarized in Table V.UCI issued TLD badges to UCI students or researchers regularly utilizing radiation.

Finger dosimetry (TLD) rings are also issued to personnel who might be regularly handling radioactive sources. TLD's are read quarterly by Global Dosimetry Solutions, and results are presented in Table Va. Data are for 4 quarters of operations since April 1. 2011. Reporting categories are DEEP, EYE, and SHALLOW. Other individuals visiting or casually working in the facility were issued DOSIN4AN/R for which results are shown in Table Vb. 30 persons were issued TLD badges on a continual basis; 9 were also issued with finger TLDs. 44 students and 3 teaching assistants in a Radioisotope Techniques class were TLC badged. Reported exposures fell in a narrow range averaging 0.25 mrem each person for the quarter.Table Vb. also lists all visiting individuals that were issued with DOSIMAN/R monitors that record in units of 0.1 mR. In the course of a few hours, a worker can accumulate 0.2 mr. A tour visitor accumulates 0.0 or 0.1 mR during a 45 minute visit to the facility.

Any reading above 0.2 is thus tabulated separately.

TABLE Va.Personnel Exposure Report Summary for 12 months: 4/1/10 to 3/30/11 (in millirem)Individuals Whole Body Finver Ring DEEP EYE SHALLOW (Shallowl 11 0 26 43 351 102 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 0 Totals 0 26 43 351 474 Range 0-16 (mean <1) Range 0-16 (mean <1) Range 0-16 (mean <1) not issued class total 28 28 28 Totals 28 54 71 351 (78 individuals)

(78 individuals)

(78 individuals)

(9 persons)Aggregated non-zero data from self-reading dosimeters issued to researchers or visitors in addition to TLD badges are: Persons Admissions Total Accumulation (per person) I (mrem)1' 4 .6.4 70 other visitors logged 2 each on average 1.2 167 in tour groups I each 0.0 to 0.1 each monitor Total 238 persons Total 320 Total 11.6 mrem 1. Individuals doing extensive or casual activation analysis and radiochemical work at the facility.

Most of the exposure is a result of C]-38 or A1-28 radioactivity production.

2. Individuals receiving exposure as a result of shipping isotopes, and/or calibration activities in the facility.3. Individuals who did enter but not carry out radiation related activities during this period, so any exposure reported is an indication of range of general background/precision where the badges are stored when not in use.4. Reported for students and teaching assistants in Radioisotope Techniques class Jan-Mar 2011. Note badges kept 24/7 in laborator, room. All also ran samples by NAA as well as working with sealed sources.5. Issuing 1 dosimeter each for groups up to 10 and 10 randomly for larger groups. No readings > 0.1 mrem were recorded.Personnel exposures continue to be very low at this facility in keeping with ALARA efforts. Fewer isotope shipments have been made this year, so exposure from that activity is lower.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 12 U. C. IRVINE Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report for July 1st, 2011 to June30th .2012 Facility License R-1 16.Docket 50-326 Prepared in Accordance with Part 6.7f of the Facility Technical Specifications by, Dr. George E. Miller, Reactor Supervisor and Jonathan Wallick, Staff Nuclear Science Engineer., SRO UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page I Section 1. Operations Narrative Summary Operation of this facility supports UCI research and education programs in the Department of Chemistry (CHEM) and the Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Science (ChEMS).Research is being conducted in application of radioisotopes as tracers and radiochemical analytical and separation techniques including applications to nuclear waste separations (ChEMS).Reactor utilization, apart from operator training and maintenance, is for analytical sample irradiation and production of isotopic tracers. Analysis samples come from diverse origins related to forensic science, fossil fuels, geochemistry, art, and archaeological studies, chemical separations in nuclear fuel cycle experiments, chemical synthesis, industrial quality control, enzyme studies, trace element pollution studies, etc. The reactor is also used in class work by undergraduates learning tracer and activation analysis techniques using small quantities of short-lived activated materials.

Enrollment in the Fall Quarter 2011 laboratory course in Radioisotope Techniques using the facility was 44 students with 3 graduate teaching assistants, who also learned these techniques.

A three-week intensive summer course in reactor operations was offered in July, 2011 for 8 individuals.

A two-week repeat of this course is planned for July 2012.Use is also made of the facility by other educational institutions, both for research and for visits/tours.

A modest Nuclear Science Outreach program (NSOP) using UCI students to present talks and a laboratory to middle and high school classes has been continued.

This program has also involved tours, class demonstrations, and analyses of samples submitted by faculty. In this period, NSOP received no direct financial support.A grant from the Department of Energy was awarded to enable refurbishment of some auxiliary equipment (continuous air monitor samplers, automatic sample changer) and construction of a sample irradiation loop for flowing liquids, and a bum-up fuel element monitor instrument.

Operations have continued at the increased level experienced last year. Criticality was achieved for 161.13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br />, and the total energy generated was equivalent to 85.1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> at full steady state power. 129 separate experiments were performed, and over 2200 samples were irradiated (sometimes multiple samples are included in a single capsule and are not always separately logged).5 moderate level mixed isotope shipments were made, all Yellow II category.

Two low level test pulse operations have been performed to assess current instrumentation ability. Three 50.59 changes were approved this year: (i) shorting the terminals on relays 18 and 21 in the control console, (ii)reduction of the air pressure of the fast transient rod from 85 psig to 50 psig, (iii) replacement of a 220 ohm, 2 watt resistor, with 220 ohm, 5 watt resistor.

In addition, a new pumping system for ground water adjacent to the reactor tank was installed.

No unusual surveillance results/activities were conducted during this period.A routine NRC inspection was carried out on December 1 2 th to the 14th of 2011, resulting in two Notices of Violation, both of which have been corrected and reported to the NRC as having been corrected.

An NRC non-routine inspection was carried out from March 1 4 th -15th 2012. No Notices of Violation were received regarding anything at the facility.

In 2011-12, Reactor Operations Committee meetings were held on Sept 7th 2011 and March 7th 2012 in accordance with Technical Specification schedule requirements.

No follow-ups or incidents have been forthcoming regarding security or emergency response.A review of the Emergency Plan was carried out by key personnel on May 4 th 2012. As a result wording changes were made to upgrade the E-Plan according to changes made in the UCI Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. UCI is now relying more on contractors to carry out recovery tasks. OCFA remains the primary response team with their HAXMAT group. A training exercise was conducted May 9th 2012 for the 4 SRO's on site to review procedures in response to a CAM- alarm. A training exercise involving all qualified SROs was administered on June 1 1 th, 2012, testing knowledge of high radiation casualty procedures.

An exercise/training is scheduled to be held UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 2 July 2 5 th, 2012 for the UCI EH&S.radiological personnel, Orange County Fire Authority, and reactor operators related to response to a laboratory radiation spill event involving personnel injury.Inspections/audits continue to be conducted quarterly by the Radiation Protection staff of EH&S at UCI. These have identified that frequency schedules have been properly maintained, and.results continue to show absence of significant levels of contamination or personnel exposure.Operator examinations during the year (February 2012) resulted in the licensing of 1 new individual as an SRO, and 2 RO's. As of June 30th 2012, 5 SRO's and 2 RO's were active.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility .Annual Report 2011-2012 Pagye 3 Section 2. Data Tabulations for the Period July 1st. 2011 to June 30th. 2012 TABLE I.Experiment Approvals on file Experiments performed (including repeats)Samples irradiated Energy generated this period (Megawatt hours)Total, 69 element core = 127.0>74 element core = 1391.0 Total energy generated since initial criticality Pulse operation this period Total reactor pulses to 6/30/2012 129 2264 21.27 Hours critical this period Total hours critical to date Inadvertent scrams or unplanned shutdowns or events at power Visitors to reactor -as individuals or in tour groups -Maximum dosimeter recorded for visitors -all less than Visiting researchers (Temporary Self Indicating Dosimeters)

Maximum exposure recorded at one visit Visiting researchers (Thermoluminescent Dosimeters)

Students and teaching assistants in class, badged Exposures reported for.quarter (range: 0-10 mrem) average Isotope Shipments this period (mixed act'n products = 0.9 ptcuries total)TABLE II Reactor Core Status 6/30/12 (core configuration unchanged 1518.0 Mwh 2 980 161.13 8851.3 7 238 0.2 mrem 28 3.3 mrem 30 47 0.25 mrem 5 from 6/30/1 0'om 6/3 0/ 10)Fuel elements in core (including 2 fuel followers)

Fuel elements in storage (reactor tank -used)Fuel elements unused (4 instrumented elements + 1 element + 1 FFCR)Graphite reflector elements in core Graphite reflector elements in reactor tank storage Water filled fuel element positions Experimental facilities in core po.sitions Non-fuel control rods Total core positions accounted for Core excess, cold, no xenon (as of 6/28/2012)

Control rod worths (calibrated 10/4/2011)

REG $2.70 SHIM $3.55 ATR $1.72 FTR $0.65 Total: $8.62 Maximum possible pulse insertion (calculated)

Maximum peak power recorded (no pulse operation during this period)Maximum peak temperature recorded in pulse (B-ring)82 25 6 34 0 5 4 2 127$2.42 2.3 37-Mw 0 UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility .Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 4 Section 3.Inadvertent Scrams. Unplanned Shutdowns.

Events at Power TABLE III.Date Time Power Type and Cause 2011 07/18 16:39 -2.5 w Linear scram. Auto ranging malfunctioned while switching down, skipping past the proper range and resulting in a 106% scram in the 750 mW range. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.07/19 16:55 -25 w Linear scram. Auto ranging feature failed to operate in time to keep up with rate of power increase.

Operators warned to use longer periods.SRO operator.

Restart authorized by alternate SRO.07/28 14:42 2.5 kw Linear scram. Auto ranging feature failed to operate in time to keep up with rate of slowed rate of power increase.

SRO Operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.10/04 15:50 -25 mw Linear scram. Instrument left in Manual mode in the 25 mw range.Operator error. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.10/06 17:04 191 kw During power calibration, unexpected Linear scram. Adjustment made to WRLM instrument resulted in second scram at 17:19. Additional adjustment remedied problem: SRO Operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.2012 3/15 9:07-25 k-w Linear scram. Auto ranging feature failed to function when switching from the 25 kw range to the 75 "w range. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO. " .;.,, UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 5 Section 4 Maintenance and Surveillance and Other Incidents The following non-routine maintenance/surveillance activities were carried out during this period.Any reactor operation related items have been included above and are not repeated here.2011 October 5 th 2012 February 13th February 2 1s" February 2 7 th Power calibration run at 200 kilowatts indicated power (WRLM). Several SCRAMs occurred while making adjustments to the Full Power Gain Adjust on the WrRLM instrument.

Proper calibration was achieved and the spurious SCRAM behavior was negated.Reactor Control Console Key switch had maintenance performed to alleviate problems maintaining proper contact. A different set of contacts in better condition on the same wafer of the switch was placed in used and proper contact was achieved.Fast Transient Rod failed to withdraw from the core. Upon further inspection, connecting rod attached to the control rod had uncoupled from the connector located on the rod's drive due to a shearing and stripping of the threads. The connections were re-machined to previous specifications and operating pressure of the FTR in steady state mode was reduced to 50 +/- 5 psig, as documented in a 50.59 change. The repair was successful and performance has been verified to meet previous operational and technical requirements.

Shim rod failed to move upon initial start up of the day. Troubleshooting revealed a 220n 2W resistor had developed an open fault in the rod drive circuitry.

Replacement was made with a 220Q, 5W resistor, documented in a 50.59 change. Another rod drive had the same failure in 1987 and underwent the same repair. Rod drive was repaired and reinstalled successfully.

meeting previous operational and technical requirements.

May 17 A sample being irradiated in the Delayed Neutron System (Fast Transfer System)broke open on the counting station side of the system. Sample contained 400 mL solution of 320 [tg of Uranium-238, resulting in contamination of the DNS/FTS.Decontamination was carried out by disassembling all parts of the DNS/FTS, including the core terminus that had been in use at the time of contamination, and proceeding to decontaminate with deionized water. Decontamination successful and repair affected to the DNS/FTS, preventing further sample breaches in the future.Performance evaluated to put back in operation.

UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 6 Section 5 Facility Chanaes and Special Experiments Approved Three 10 CFR 50.59 changes have been implemented during the course of the last year. The first change involved shorting the terminals on relays 18 and 21 in the reactor control console in order to make them available as spares. as they had served no purpose in the console beforehand.

The second change was the reduction in operating pressure of the Fast Transient Rod to reduce the mechanical stresses placed on the rod, which is suspected to be a root cause of the rod's failure earlier in the year.The third change was for the SHIM rod's electrical control system, which had a failed 220 ohm, 2 watt resistor.

The resistor was replaced with a 220 ohm, 5 watt resistor.

An identical replacement had been successfully performed on another rod drive in 1987.No special or unusual experiments were approved or carried out.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012P Pagze 7 Section 6. Radioactive Effluent Release.(a) Gases.The major direct release to the environs is Argon-41 produced during normal operations.

Very small amounts of other gases may be released from irradiated materials in experiments.

Releases are computed based on original measurements at point of origin within the facility and taking only dilution into account. Since much of the release is from operation of the pneumatic transfer system for samples, this is a conservative estimate in that assumption is made that all use of the PT is at full steady state power level (250 kW) when, in fact, considerable use is with the reactor at a lower power level. In view of the small numbers involved, and the fact that an integrated dose check is provided by an environmental dosimeter (CaSO 4-Dy) hanging directly in the exhaust at the point of stack discharge, it is considered unnecessary to provide further checks of these estimates.

The dosimeter data confirm that an individual standing directly in the exhaust flow for one year would receive an additional submersion dose from the exhaust less than the reliability limit of the dosimeters, or less than 20 mrem per year. The dosimeter data are presented separately in Section 7.Table IV. Over the years that data have been collected, the accumulated exposure at the exhaust locations have been lower than for "control" points because of lower masses of concrete structures in the vicinity.

In fact the data have been consistently at 20-25 mrem per year below background level., so confidence of exposure less than 5 mrem over background seems possible.Release estimates based on operational parameters are as follows: (1) Operation of pneumatic transfer system (7/1/11-6/30/12):

a. Minutes of operation:

329 minutes b. Release rate assumed: 6.0 x 10-8 microcuries/mL

c. Flow rate of exhaust air: 1L2 x 108 mL/min d. Dilution factor: 0.01 Total release computed: (a x b x c x d) 2.4 x 101 microcuries (2) Release from pool surface (7/1/11-6/30/12):

a. Total hours of operation at full power (Effective Full Power Hours) = 85.1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> b. Release rate assumed: 1.0 x 10-8 microcuries/mL

c. Flow rate of exhaust air: 1.2 x 108 mL/min d. Dilution factor: 0.01 Total release computed: (a x 60 x b x c x d) = 1.6x 10 0 microcuries

e. Total of (1) and (2) emission in 1 year = 1.2 x 102 microcuries

f. Total effluent released in 1 year (525960 minutes/yr.

x c x d) = 6.3 x 1011 mnL Concentration averaged over 12 months (d/e) = -< 1.9 x 10-10 microcuries/mL Since 2 x 10' microcuries/mL provides an annual exposure for constant immersion of 10 mrem, this corresponds to < 1.0 mrem potential additional radiation exposure to an individual standing breathing in the effluent stack for the entire year.Exhaust is diluted by a factor of 100 before release and the mixed plume is released at -100 feet above the roof level (200 feet above surrounding ground).UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 8 (b) Liquids and Solids.Liquid and solid wastes from utilization of by-product materials are disposed through a university.

contract.

Waste is transferred to the custody of UCI Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S). Disposals to this custody are given below. It is important to note that activity values are estimated at the time of transfer to EH&S control. Since few shipments are being made from campus, decay to negligible levels occurs for all medium-lived radionuclides.

Teaching course items (used for training in liquid scintillation counting techniques) may be a mixture of reactor generated byproducts and purchased materials (exclusively 1 4 C and 3 H).DRY WASTES: Three transfers of 2 cubic foot containers of dry waste were disposed during this period (7/1/11 through 6/30/12) estimated at a total quantity in 6 cu ft of 8.72 microcuries of mixed activation products (measured as 6 0 Co equivalent at time of transfer).

LIQUIDS: One transfer of 500 mL of liquid waste was made this year. Content of the transfer was 320 gg ofU-238 dissolved in 500 mL of deionized water. No 14C was disposed or purchased this year.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 9 Section 7.Environmental Surveillance.

Calcium Sulfate/Dysprosium thermoluminescent dosimeters are in place at 12 locations around the UCI Campus for environmental monitoring purposes.

Starting July 1 2004, these are provided by Global Dosimetry Solutions (GDS), Costa Mesa, California.

The GDS packs have three chips in each pack which are averaged for exposure recording.

GDS runs multiple control samples in addition to the locations listed below. All dosimeters are housed in small metal lock-boxes (except for locations 10 and 12). The table below lists the locations.

An additional dosimeter has been located in Engineering Tower, Room 521 (#12), for a total of 12.Routine contamination surveys consisting of wipe tests and G-M surveys have shown mostly a "clean" facility with significant, removable contamination only in areas coming into direct contact with samples removed from the reactor, and on sample handling tools. Trash is surveyed before disposal and not disposed unless found to be free of removable and fixed contamination.

Table of Locations for Environmental Dosimeter Packs.1. South Reactor Facility Perimeter 2. West Reactor Facility Perimeter 3. North Reactor Facility Perimeter 4. Reactor Facility Main Air Exhaust.5. Rowland Hall, First Floor Hallway Over Reactor Facility 6. McGaugh Hall Top Floor 7. Langson Library Top Floor 8. Reines Hall Top Floor 9. Reactor Facility Emergency Exhaust Duct 10. On-campus Housing 11. Rowland Hall Building Fume Hood Exhaust Duct 12. Engineering Tower Room 521 UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 10 TABLE IV.Environmental Dosimetry Data.2011-2012 Exposures in mnrem. (including "control background")

Averaie Total Location.1. S. Facility perimeter 2. W. Facility perimeter 3. N Facility perimeter 4. Facility main air exhaust 5. Hallway over facility 6. McGaugh Hall top floor 7. Langson Library top floor 8. Reines Hall top floor 9. Facility emer .exh.10. On-campus housing 11 Facility fume hood exh.12 Engineering Tower 521 Background control (GDS)Quarter Annual. Prior year 2/11 3/11 4'11 1/12 Total 2011/12 24 35 26 28 113 22 29 24 29 104 23 32 27 31 113 19 25 21 26 91 19 27 23 27 96 21 28 24 28 101 26 3 3 28 33 120 24 30 26 30 110 18 24 21 25 88 18 26 21 27 92 16 24 22 26 89 18 28 22 26 84 23 31 25 32 111 Totals 2010/11 110 109 115 101 97 107 122 113 100 100 117 Excess(1 1-12)over control mr ANNUAL+2-7+2-20-15-10+9-1-23-19-27 0 Discussion Raw data is presented here, along with controls and prior year comparisons.

Within this range, the data vary with significant consistency.

Locations 1, 3,and 9 are usually the highest, 10 the lowest.Data for this year reflects several issues:* Location 7 is on the top floor of a large building and may experience greater cosmic flux, as well as concrete releases." Location 3 is on a heavy concrete wall." Location 1 is a hallway with an extremely low occupancy rate. (See additional note below).* In spite of increased operations, levels remain statistically within range of previous year.Exposure estimated to a single individual in an uncontrolled area at this facility is still very minimal.Locations 1 and 2 are in hallways with extremely minimal occupancy or travel, especially since security policy is to maintain permanently locked doors to the hallways on this floor level (access only to individuals with building keys). The rooms overhead (location

4) are casually occupied by very few individuals (one or two at the most) in the space above the reactor core. The air released from the facility/building (measured by locations

1. 5, #6 and #7) continues to give no detectable exposure above background.

Over many years, the data at each specific location has shown remarkable consistency.

The net conclusion is that, within precision of measurement, and compared to distant control areas (numbers 9 and 10), we are operating with very minimal levels (within statistical error of zero) of potential (full 24/7 occupancy) public exposure over normal background levels.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page I11 Section 8. Radiation Exposure to Personnel.

Personnel exposure data are summarized in Table V.UCI issued TLD badges to UCI students or researchers regularly utilizing radiation.

Finger dosimetry (TLD) rings are also issued to personnel who might be regularly handling radioactive sources. TLD's are read quarterly by Global Dosimetry Solutions, and results are presented in Table Va. Data are for 4 quarters of operations since April 1, 2011. Reporting categories are DEEP, EYE. and SHALLOW. Other individuals visiting or casually working in the facility were issued DOSIMAN/R for which results are shown in Table Vb. 30 persons were issued TLD badges on a continual basis; 9 were also issued with finger TLDs. 44 students and 3 teaching assistants in a Radioisotope Techniques class were TLC badged. Reported exposures fell in a narrow range averaging 0.25 mrem each person for the quarter.Table Vb. also lists all visiting individuals that were issued with DOSIMAN/R monitors that record in units of 0.1 mR. In the course of a few hours, a worker can accumulate 0.2 mr. A tour visitor accumulates 0.0 or 0.1 mR during a 45 minute visit to the facility.

Any reading above 0.2 is thus tabulated separately.

TABLE Va.Personnel Exposure Report Summary for 12 months: 4/1/10 to 3/30/11 (in millirem)Individuals Whole Body Fingejring DEEP EYE SHALLOW (Shallowl 1' 0 26 43 351 102 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 0 Totals 0 26 43 351 474 Range 0-16 (mean <1) Range 0-16 (mean <1) Range 0-16 (mean <1) not issued class total 28 28 28 _Totals 28 54 71 351 (78 individuals)

(78 individuals)

(78 individuals)

(9 persons)Aggregated non-zero data from self-reading dosimeters issued to researchers or visitors in addition to TLD badges are: Persons Admissions Total Accumulation (per person) (mrem)11 4 6.4 70 other visitors logged 2 each on average L.2 167 in tour oups-~ I each 0.0 to 0.1 each monitor Total 238 persons Total 320 Total 11.6 mrem 1. Individuals doing extensive or casual activation analysis and radiochemical work at the facility.

Most of the exposure is a result of Cl-38 or AI-28 radioactivity production.

2. Individuals receiving exposure as a result of shipping isotopes, and/or calibration activities in the facility.3. Individuals who did enter but not carr, out radiation related activities during this period, so any exposure reported is an indication of range of general background/precision where the badges are stored when not in use.4. Reported for students and teaching assistants in Radioisotope Techniques class Jan-Mar 2011. Note badges kept 24/7 in laboratory room. All also ran samples by NAA as well as working with sealed sources.5. Issuing 1 dosimeter each for groups up to 10 and 10 randomly for larger groups. No readings > 0.1 mrem were recorded.Personnel exposures continue to be very low at this facility in keeping with ALARA efforts. Fewer isotope shipments have been made this year, so exposure from that activity is lower.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 12 U. C. IRVINE Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report for July 1st, 2011 to June 30%t, 2012 Facility License R-1 16 Docket 50-326 Prepared in Accordance With Part 6.7f of the Facility Technical Specifications by.Dr. George E. Miller, Reactor Supervisor and Jonathan Wallick. Staff Nuclear Science Engineer, SRO UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 1 Section 1. Operations Narrative Summary Operation of this facility supports UCI research and education programs in the Department of Chemistry (CHEM) and the Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Science (Ch.EMS).Research is being conducted in application of radioisotopes as tracers and radiochemical analytical and separation techniques including applications to nuclear waste separations (ChEMS).Reactor utilization, apart from operator training and maintenance, is for analytical sample irradiation and production of isotopic tracers. Analysis samples come from diverse origins related to forensic science, fossil fuels, geochemistry, art, and archaeological studies, chemical separations in nuclear fuel cycle experiments, chemical synthesis, industrial quality control, enzyme studies, trace element pollution studies, etc. The reactor is also used in class work by undergraduates learning tracer and activation analysis techniques using small quantities of short-lived activated materials.

Enrollment in the Fall Quarter 2011 laboratory course in Radioisotope Techniques using the facility was 44 students with 3 graduate teaching assistants, who also learned these techniques.

A three-week intensive summer course in reactor operations was offered in July, 2011 for 8 individuals.

A two-week repeat of this course is planned for July 2012.Use is also made of the facility by other educational institutions, both for research and for-visits/tours.

A modest Nuclear Science Outreach program (NSOP) using UCI students to present talks and a laboratory to middle and high school classes has been continued.

This program has also involved tours, class demonstrations, and analyses of samples submitted by faculty. In this period, NSOP received no direct financial support.A grant from the Department of Energy was awarded to enable refurbishment of some auxiliary equipment (continuous air monitor samplers, automatic sample changer) and construction of a sample irradiation loop for flowing liquids, and a burn-up fuel element monitor instrument.

Operations have continued at the increased level experienced last year. Criticality was achieved for 161.13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br />, and the total energy generated was equivalent to 85.1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> at full steady state power. 129 separate experiments were performed, and over 2200 samples were irradiated (sometimes multiple samples are included in a single capsule and are not always separately logged).5 moderate level mixed isotope shipments were made, all Yellow II category.

Two low level test pulse operations have been performed to assess current instrumentation ability. Three 50.59 changes were approved this year: (i) shorting the terminals on relays 18 and 21 in the control console, (ii)reduction of the air pressure of the fast transient rod from 85 psig to 50 psig, (iii) replacement of a 220 ohm, 2 watt resistor, with 220 ohm, 5 watt resistor.

In addition, a new pumping system for ground water adjacent to the reactor tank was installed.

No unusual surveillance results/activities were conducted during this period.A routine NRC inspection was carried out on December 12th to the 1 4 th of 2011, resulting in two Notices of Violation, both of which have been corrected and reported to the NRC as having been corrected.

An NRC non-routine inspection was carried out from March 14th -15th 2012. No Notices of Violation were received regarding anything at the facility.

In 2011-12, Reactor Operations Committee meetings were held on Sept 7th 2011 and March 7th 2012 in accordance with Technical Specification schedule requirements.

No follow-ups or incidents have been forthcoming regarding security or emergency response.A review of the Emergency Plan was carried out by key personnel on May 4 th 2012. As a result wording changes were made to upgrade the E-Plan according to changes made in the UCI Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. UCI is now relying more on contractors to carry out recovery tasks. OCFA remains the primary response team with their HAXMAT group. A training exercise was conducted May 9th 2012 for the 4 SRO's on site to review procedures in response to a CAMv alarm. A training exercise involving all qualified SROs was administered on June 1 1 th, 2012, testing knowledge of high radiation casualty procedures.

An exercise/training is scheduled to be held UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page2 July 2 5 th 2012 for the UCI EH&S radiological personnel, Orange County Fire Authority, and reactor operators related to response to a laboratory radiation spill event involving personnel injury.Inspections/audits continue to be conducted quarterly by the Radiation Protection staff of EH&S at UCI. These have identified that frequency schedules have been properly maintained, and results continue to show absence of significant levels of contamination or personnel exposure.Operator examinations during the year (February 2012) resulted in the licensing of 1 new individual as an SRO. and 2 RO's. As of June 30th 2012, 5 SRO's and 2 RO's were active.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 page 3)

Section 2. Data Tabulations for the Period July 1st. 2011 to June 30th. 2012 TABLE I.Experiment Approvals on file Experiments performed (including repeats)Samples irradiated Energy generated this period (Megawatt hours)Total, 69 element core = 127.0>74 element core = 1391.0 Total energy generated since initial criticality Pulse operation this period Total reactor pulses to 6/30/2012 3 129 2264 21.27 Hours critical this-period Total hours critical to date Inadvertent scrams or unplanned shutdowns or events at power Visitors to reactor -as individuals or in tour groups -Maximum dosimeter recorded for visitors -all less than Visiting researchers (Temporary Self Indicating Dosimeters)

Maximum exposure recorded at one visit Visiting researchers (Thermoluminescent Dosimeters)

Students and teaching assistants in class, badged Exposures reported for quarter (range: 0-10 mrem) average Isotope Shipments this period (mixed act'n products = 0.9 Jicuries total)1518.0 Mwh 980 161.13 8851.3 7 238 0.2 mrem 28 3.3 mrem 47 0.25 mrem 5 TABLE II Reactor Core Status 6/30/12 (core configuration unchanged from 6/30/10)Fuel elements in core (including 2 fuel followers)

Fuel elements in storage (reactor tank -used)Fuel elements unused (4 instrumented elements + 1 element + 1 FFCR)Graphite reflector elements in core Graphite reflector elements in reactor tank storage Water filled fuel element positions Experimental facilities in core positions Non-fuel control rods Total core positions accounted for Core excess, cold. no xenon (as of 6/28/2012)

Control rod worths (calibrated 10/4/2011)

REG $2.70 SHIM $3.55 ATR $1.72 FTR $0.65 Total: $8.62 Maximum possible pulse insertion (calculated)

Maximum peak power recorded (no pulse operation during this period)Maximum peak temperature recorded in pulse (B-ring)82 25 6 34 0 5 4 2 127$2.42$2.37-Mw 0.C UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility .Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 4 Section 3.Inadvertent Scrams. Unplanned Shutdowns.

Events at Power TABLE III.Date Time Power Type and Cause 2011 07/18 16:39 -2.5 w Linear scram. Auto ranging malfunctioned while switching down, skipping past the proper range and resulting in a 106% scram in the 750 mW range. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.07/19 16:55 -25 w Linear scram. Auto ranging feature failed to operate in time to keep up with rate of power increase.

Operators warned to use longer periods.SRO operator.

Restart authorized by alternate SRO.07/28 14:42 2.5 kw Linear scram. Auto ranging feature failed to operate in time to keep up with rate of slowed rate of power increase.

SRO Operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.10/04 15:50 -25 mw Linear scram. Instrument left in Manual mode in the 25 mw range.Operator error. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.10/06 17:04 191 kw During power calibration, unexpected Linear scram. Adjustment made to WRLM instrument resulted in second scram at 17:19.. Additional adjustment remedied problem. SRO Operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.2012 3/15 9:07 -25 kw Linear scram. Auto ranging feature failed to function when switching from the 25 kwn range to -the 75 kw range. Trainee operator.

Restart authorized by SRO.UCI Nuclear. Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 5 Section 4 Maintenance and Surveillance and Other Incidents The following non-routine maintenance/surveillance activities were carried out during this period.Any reactor operation related items have been included above and are, not repeated here.2011 October 5t Power calibration run at 200 kilowatts indicated power (WRLM). Several SCRAMs occurred while making adjustments to the Full Power Gain Adjust on the WRLM instrument.

Proper calibration was achieved and the spurious SCRAM behavior was negated.2012 February 13th Reactor Control Console Key switch had maintenance performed to alleviate problems maintaining proper contact. A different set of contacts in better condition on the same wafer of the switch was placed in used and proper contact was achieved.February 21 st Fast Transient Rod failed to withdraw from the core. Upon further inspection, connecting rod attached to the control rod had uncoupled from the connector located on the rod's drive due to a shearing and stripping of the threads. The connections were re-machined to previous specifications and operating pressure of the FTR in steady state mode was reduced to 50 +/- 5 psig, as documented in a 50.59 change. The repair was successful and performance has been verified to meet previous operational and technical requirements.

February 2 7 th Shim rod failed to move upon initial start up of the day. Troubleshooting revealed a 220n 2W resistor had developed an open fault in the rod drive circuitry.

Replacement was made with a 220f0, 5W resistor, documented in a 50.59 change. Another rod drive had the same failure in 1987 and underwent the same repair. Rod drive was repaired and reinstalled successfully, meeting previous operational and technical requirements.

May 17th A sample being irradiated in the Delayed Neutron System (Fast Transfer System)broke open on the counting station side of the system. Sample contained 400 mL solution of 320 j.tg of Uranium-238, resulting in contamination of the DNS/FTS.Decontamination was carried out by disassembling all parts of the DNS/FTS, including the core terminus that had been in use at the time of contamination, and proceeding to decontaminate with deionized water. Decontamination successful and repair affected to the DNS/FTS, preventing further sample breaches in the future.Performance evaluated to put back in operation.

UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 6 Section 5 Facility Changes and Special Experiments Approved Three 10 CFR 50.59 changes have been implemented during the course of the last year. The first change involved shorting the terminals on relays 18 and 21 in the reactor control console in order to make them available as spares, as they had served no purpose in the console beforehand.

The second change was the reduction in operating pressure of the Fast Transient Rod to reduce the mechanical stresses placed on the rod, which is suspected to be a root cause of the rod's failure earlier in the year.The third change was for the SHIM rod's electrical control system, which had a failed 220 ohm, 2 watt resistor.

The resistor was replaced with a 220 ohm, 5 watt resistor.

An identical replacement had been successfully performed on another rod drive in 1987.No special or unusual experiments were approved or carried out.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 7 Section 6. Radioactive Effluent Release.(a) Gases.The major direct release to the environs is Argon-41 produced during normal operations.

Very small amounts of other gases may be released from irradiated materials in experiments.

Releases are computed based on original measurements at point of origin within the facility and taking only dilution into account. Since much of the release is from operation of the pneumatic transfer system for samples, this is a conservative estimate in that assumption is made that all use of the PT is at full steady state power level (250 kW) when, in fact, considerable use is with the reactor at a lower power level. In view of the small numbers involved, and the fact that an inteorated dose check is provided by an environmental dosimeter (CaSO 4-Dy) hanging directly in the exhaust at the point of stack discharge, it is considered unnecessary to provide further checks of these estimates.

The dosimeter data confirm that an individual standing directly in the exhaust flow for one year would receive an additional submersion dose from the exhaust less than the reliability limit of the dosimeters, or less than 20 mrem per year. The dosimeter data are presented separately in Section 7.Table IV. Over the years that data have been collected, the accumulated exposure at the exhaust locations have been lower than for "control" points because of lower masses of concrete structures in the vicinity.

In fact the data have been consistently at 20-25 mrem per year below background level, so confidence of exposure less than 5 mrem over background seems possible.Release estimates based on operational parameters are as follows: (1) Operation of pneumatic transfer system (7/1/11-6/30/12):

a. Minutes of operation:

329 minutes b. Release rate assumed: 6.0 x 10-8 microcuries/mL

c. Flow rate of exhaust air: 1.2 x 108 mL/min d. Dilution factor: 0.01 Total release computed: (a x b x c x d) 2.4 x 101 microcuries (2) Release from pool surface (7/1/11-6/30/12):

a. Total hours of operation at full power (Effective Full Power Hours) = 85.1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> b. Release rate assumed: 1.0 x 10-8 microcuries/mL

c. Flow rate of exhaust air: 1.2 x 10 8 mL/min d. Dilution factor: 0.01 Total release computed: (a x 60 x b x c x d) = 1.6 x 10 0 microcuries

e. Total of (1) and (2) emission in 1 year = 1.2 x 102 microcuries

f. Total effluent released in 1 year (525960 minutes/yr.

x c x d) = 6.3 x 1011 mL Concentration averaged over 12 months (d/e) = -< 1.9 x 10-10 microcuries/mL

-9 Since 2 x 10 microcuries/mIL provides an annual exposure for constant immersion of 10 mrem, this corresponds to < 1.0 mrem potential additional radiation exposure to an individual standing breathing in the effluent stack for the entire year.Exhaust is diluted by a factor of 100 before release and the mixed plume is released at -100 feet above the roof level (200 feet above surrounding ground).UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012P Page 8 (b) Liquids and Solids.Liquid and solid wastes from utilization of by-product materials are disposed through a university contract.

Waste is transferred to the custody of UCI Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S). Disposals to this custody are given below. It is important to note that activity values are estimated at the time of transfer to EM&S control. Since few shipments are being made from campus, decay to negligible levels occurs for all medium-lived radionuclides.

Teaching course items (used for training in liquid scintillation counting techniques) may be a mixture of reactor generated byproducts and purchased materials (exclusively 14C and 3 H).DRY WASTES: Three transfers of 2 cubic foot containers of dry waste were disposed during this period (7/1/11 through 6/30/12) estimated at a total quantity in 6 cu ft of 8.72 microcuries of mixed activation products (measured as 6 0 Co equivalent at time of transfer).

LIQUIDS: One transfer of 500 mL of liquid waste was made this year. Content of the transfer was 320 gg of U-238 dissolved in 500 mL of deionized water. No 1 4 C was disposed or purchased this year.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 9 Section 7.Environmental Surveillance.

Calcium Sulfate/Dysprosium thermoluminescent dosimeters are in place at 12 locations around the UCI Campus for environmental monitoring purposes.

Starting July 1 2004, these are provided by Global Dosimetry Solutions (GDS), Costa Mesa, California.

The GDS packs have three chips in each pack which are averaged for exposure recording.

GDS runs multiple control samples in addition to the locations listed below. All dosimeters are housed in small metal lock-boxes (except for locations 10 and 12). The table below lists the locations.

An additional dosimeter has been located in Engineering Tower, Room 521 (#12), for a total of 12.Routine contamination surveys consisting of wipe tests and G-M surveys have shown mostly a "clean" facility with significant, removable contamination only in areas coming into direct contact with samples removed from the reactor, and on sample handling tools. Trash is surveyed before disposal and not disposed unless found to be free of removable and fixed contamination.

Table of Locations for Environmental Dosimeter Packs.1. South Reactor Facility Perimeter 2. West Reactor Facility Perimeter 3. North Reactor Facility Perimeter 4. Reactor Facility Main Air Exhaust 5. Rowland Hall, First Floor Hallway Over Reactor Facility 6. McGaugh Hall Top Floor 7. Langson Library Top Floor 8. Reines Hall Top Floor 9. Reactor Facility Emergency Exhaust Duct 10. On-campus Housing 11. Rowland Hall Building Fume Hood Exhaust Duct 12. Engineering Tower Room 521 UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 10 TABLE IV.Environmental Dosimetry Data.2011-2012 posures in nrem (including "control background")

Averane Total Ext Location.1. S. Facility perimeter 2. W. Facility perimeter 3. N Facility perimeter 4. Facility main air exhaust 5. Hallway over facility 6. McGaugh Hall top floor 7. Langson Library top floor 8. Reines Hall top floor 9. Facility emer .exh.10. On-campus housing 11 Facility fume hood exh.12 Engineering Tower 521 Background control (GDS)Quarter Annual Prior year 2/11 3/11 4/11 1/12 Total 2011/12 24 35 26 28 113 22 29 24 29 104, 23 32 27 31 113 19 25 21 26 91 19 27 23. 27 .96 21 28 24 28 101 26 33 28 33 120 24 30 26 30 110 18 24 21 25 88 18 26 21 27 92 16 24 22 26 89 18 28 22 26 84 23 31 25 32 111 Totals 2010/11 110 109 115 101 97 107 122 113 100 100 117 Excess(1 1-12)over control mr ANNUAL+2-7+2-20-15-10+9-1-23-19-27 0 Discussion Raw data is presented here, along with controls and prior year comparisons.

Within this range, the, data vary with significant consistency.

Locations 1, 3, and 9 are usually the highest, 10 the lowest.Data for this year reflects several issues: q" Location 7 is on the top floor of a large building and may experience greater cosmic flux, as well as concrete releases.* Location 3 is on a heavy concrete wall." Location 1 is a hallway with an extremely low occupancy rate. (See additional note below).* In spite of increased operations, levels remain statistically within range of previous year.Exposure estimated to a single individual in an uncontrolled area at this facility is still very minimal.Locations 1 and 2 are in hallways with extremely minimal occupancy or travel, especially since security policy is to maintain permanently locked doors to the hallways on this floor level (access only to individuals with building keys). The rooms overhead (location

4) are casually occupied by very few individuals (one or two at the most) in the space above the reactor core. The air released from the facility/building (measured by locations

1. 5, #6 and #7) continues to give no detectable exposure above background.

Over many years, the data at each specific location has shown remarkable consistency.

The net conclusion is that, within precision of measurement, and compared to distant control areas (numbers 9 and 10), we are operating with very minimal levels (within statistical error of zero) of potential (full 24/7 occupancy) public exposure over normal background levels.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 11 Section 8. Radiation Exposure to Personnel.

Personnel exposure data are summarized in Table V.UCI issued TLD badges to UCI students or researchers regularly utilizing radiation.

Finger dosimetry (TLD) rings are also issued to personnel who might be regularly handling radioactive sources. TLD's are read quarterly by Global Dosimetry Solutions, and results are presented in Table Va. Data are for 4 quarters of operations since April 1, 2011. Reporting categories are DEEP, EYE, and SHALLOW. Other individuals visiting or casually working in the facility were issued DOSIMAN/R for which results are shown in Table Vb. 30 persons were issued TLD badges on a continual basis; 9 were also issued with finger TLDs. 44 students and 3 teaching assistants in a Radioisotope Techniques class were TLC badged. Reported exposures fell in a narrow range averaging 0.25 mrem each person for the quarter.Table Vb. also lists all visiting individuals that were issued with DOSIMAN/R monitors that record in units of 0.1 mR. In the course of a few hours, a worker can accumulate 0.2 mr. A tour visitor accumulates 0.0 or 0.1 mR during a 45 minute visit to the facility.

Any reading above 0.2 is thus tabulated separately.

TABLE Va.Personnel Exposure Report Summary for 12 months: 4/1/10 to 3/30/11 (in millirem)Individuals Whole Body Fnge DEEP EYE SHALLOW (Shallow)11 0 26 43 351 102 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 0 Totals 0 26 43 351 474 Range 0-16 (mean <1) Range 0-16 (mean <1) Range 0-16 (mean <1) not issued class total 28 28 28 Totals 28 54 71 351 (78 individuals)

(78 individuals)

(78 individuals)

(9 persons)Aggegated non-zero data from self-reading dosimeters issued to researchers or visitors in addition to TLD badges are: Persons Admissions Total Accumulation (per person) (mrem)11 4 6.4 70 other visitors logged 2 each on average 1.2 167 in tour groups- I each 0.0 to 0. 1 each monitor Total 238 persons Total 320 Total 11.6 mrem 1. Individuals doing extensive or casual activation analysis and radiochemical work at the facility.

Most of the exposure is a result of CI-38 or A1-28 radioactivity production.

2. Individuals receiving exposure as a result of shipping isotopes, and/or calibration activities in the facility.3. Individuals who did enter but not carry out radiation related activities during this period, so any exposure reported is an indication of range of general background/precision where the badges are stored when not in use.4. Reported for students and teaching assistants in Radioisotope Techniques class Jan-Mar 2011. Note badges kept 24/7 in laboratory room. All also ran samples by NAA as well as working with sealed sources.5. Issuing I dosimeter each for roups up to 10 and 10 randomly for larger groups. No readings > 0.1 mrem were recorded.Personnel exposures continue to be very low at this facility in keeping with ALARA efforts. Fewer isotope shipments have been made this year, so exposure from that activity is lower.UCI Nuclear Reactor Facility Annual Report 2011-2012 Page 12