ML17266A060

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:41, 29 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Environ Radiological Monitoring Rept,1978.
ML17266A060
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/27/1979
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17266A059 List:
References
EMR-781231-1, NUDOCS 7904170291
Download: ML17266A060 (10)


Text

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY St Lucie Plant Unit No. 1 License No. DPR-67 Docket No. 50-335 MMUAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT for The Period: 1-01-78 to 12-31-78 Prepared 3-27-79

~ i'.

Introduction This report is submitted in accordance with St. Lucie Plant Technical Specifications Section 5.6.1.b.

All environmental samples were collected and ana3.yzed during this reporting period in accordance with requirements of St. Lucie Plant's'echnical Specifications. The minimum of frequency of collection and analyses for specific radionuclide species as required by these specifications have been met or exceeded.

No'armful effects or evidence of irreversible damage to the environment or to the health and safety of individuals or population groups in the regions surrounding St. Lucie Plant have been'detected by this monitoring program.

In addition to 'the Environment Radiological Monitoring data, this report includes information about the semi-annual census for 500 ft~ gardens and milk-producing animals.

2. The Moaitorin Pro ram Anal t2.cal Res onsibilit Environmental radiological monitoring at St. Lucie Plant is. carried out by the Orlando Radio1ogical Laboratory of the. Department of Health and Rehabili- .

tative Services of Florida (DHRS) personnel.

Numb'er of Sam@les. Anal zed A. total of. 1,174 analyses on samples collected from 25'ifferent locations were performed during the period of this report. TABLE 1 summarizes the mean and, range values of these analyses.

S lit Sam le Anal ses At least 20 of the samples collected have been analyzed in the DHRS/ERDA Split-Samp'ing Program.

3. Evaluation of Data Except as noted in TABLE 1, none of the sampling locations used. m the environmenta3 radiological monitoring program showed evidence of having significant concentrations of a particular radionuclide. in a specific sample material higher than the observed mean for that radionuclide 'uch at all sampling locations.

Trend plotting of our particulate and direct radiation data reveals no plant-related variations. A'iso, all data have been evaluated with respect to pre-operational data and have been found to be within the +2a 3.imits observed for these pre-operational data. Comparative data obtained in the assay of control samples also appears in TABLE l.

4- Non-Routine Re orted Measurements Following the March Chinese weapons test, a weekly composite of air particulate filters. and a milk sample were collected and analyzed. .I was detected and appeared to be from the Chinese weapons tests.-

5. Dair Herd, Goat,, and.Garden Census A dairy herd census was conducted. in February and in August during this report- period. The nearest aairy is west of the plant site (260'); 14 miles) Data obtained in the assays of samples collected at. this location are reported in TABLE l.

One milk goat has been found, at a location SN of the plant site (220'; 2.2 miles) . It produces negligible amounts of milk.

An aerial garden census in March, '1978 showed that there several 500 ft~ gardens within approximately 5 miles. 'ere of St. Lucia Plant. Collard Greens were sampled at 7609 Indian River Drive; NSH, .2 miles, Results. of these analyses .appear in ABLE l.

6. Conclusions During- this period, the environmental radiological monitoring program chas found no evidence that the operations of PSL

'Unit No. 1 contribute harmful effects or irreversible damage to either the environment= or to the health and safety of individuals and. population groups in the regions surrounding

~

St. Lucie Plant.

TAOLE 1 ENVIRONHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL llOttITORING PROGRAH SUlttORY NAllE OF FACILITY St. Lucie Fiant Unit 1 DOCKET tlO. DPR-67 .

'Hutchinson Island, FL REPORTItlG PERIOD 1-01-78 to 12-31-78 LOCATION OF FACILITY Location with lli hest Hean Control tlumber of All Indicator ~ tlonroutine ttumber of Locations Sample Location Location~ Reported Iledium or Pathway Analysis Samnled Unit for Sites Samples Analyses tlean Range, Distance and Direction tlean Range ttean Range Heasurements 1.0 AIR FllTERS

- 0,05 0.005- 11-32: Entomolo8y Lab, 0.16 0.07- 0.0SI') 0.006- tiasuremcnts 1.1 Air Particu- pCi/m Gtt 474 474

'.23 0.14 cited in their lates 0.27 Vero Beacht Ntnt, 19 miles report 1.1 Air Zodines pCi/m! ! I 474 ND"'one 1.1 ~ Gamttta Scan PCi/me 108 108 ND Nona (ttt on thly composites of filters) deco,

~dt Filter

~e ete ot pci/m'Sr s 0Sr 9

9.

36 36

"'6 36

. ND None None

~Co dotted N-12! FPL Substation, 17-20 (a) 1.2 Direct uRem/le y 72 72 4-20 19 S R dtettoo Stuart, Florida; S, 12 miles

Location with Hi hest Hean Control Humber of All Indicator Honr outine Vedium.or Pathway Humber of Locations Sample Location Location Reported Analysis Sampled Uni t for Sites Samples Analyses Hean Range Distance and Direction lIean Range l<ean Range Heasurements 2.0 . WATER 1.1.1 ~Dtathaa a pCi/1 4ll 12 12 263 <200- II-36: On site, Dis. 263 <200-Canal 960 Canal, Drest of hlh; 960 ESE '0.19 miles 4'sr 1 12 12 None "sr 1 12 12 Hone Z.I. 2 Ocean pCi/I 'H 24 <200 None <200( )

Mater 44sr 24 None

'4sr 24 None 2.1.3 Estaurine pCi/1 4II 4 <200 Hone Mater 2.2 Cround Water Mell pCi/1 4II i <200 None GB-'DS 1 ND 3 ll-30; Residence, <1 W-3 Indian River Drive OB"UDS HD None 2.3 Pa ta ala pCi/i 'll 12 12 Hone Ilatat GB-Ds 12 ND-9 II-11; St. Lucio County 3 ND-9 Health, Dept., Ft; Piercp H, a llone

. r:.

Bj

All Indicator Location with Hl hest Hean Control llumber of of Locations Location>> ~ . Honroutlne Number Samp)e Location lledlum or Pathway Ana)ys)s Reported Samoled Unit for Sites Samples Ana'lyses Hean Range Distance and Dlrectlon lie an Range I<can Range Heasurements

3. 0 BOITOH SEDIMENTS 3.1 ~Dtsahax a Ci/k8 bbst Canal SOS'bCo 1

'

ND ND-}40'one None 1 70 B-36> On Site> Dia, 14O ND-14O Canal, Meet of hlA; ESE, 0.19 tnilea 3.2 Ocean Ci/kG bbs ND None ND(e)

$ 'ND Hone ND~'~

Os'bSr 3.3 Beach Ci/k8 6 ND None ND'>

Sand

$ bshe None

Location with Hi hest Mean Control Husker of All Indicator Honroutine Humber of Locations Sample Location Location>> ~

tledlum or .Pathway Analysis Reported Samaled Unit for Sites Samples Analyses t~iean Range Oistance and Direction lledn Range Mean Range Measurements 4.0 AIIUhYZC DIOTIA ND(')

4.1 Crustacea (c) pCI/kp ~ tsr 3 3 HD Hone 9 ts HD None HD(")

3 3

- stS None ND(")

4.2.1 Fish ~ pCi/kg Carnivore tts ND None ND(')

4.2:2 Fish- (8) pci/kg tts 4 ND None Herbivore t lsr 2 4 '3 ND-13 H-32: Entomology Lab; 13 Vero Beach, NHW, 19 miles

All Indicator Location with Ili hest I!can Control Number of Nonroutine f tedium or Pathway Analysis Number of Locations Sample Location Location~ ~

Reported Samnled Unit for Sites Samples Analyses Hean Range Distance and Direction iiean Range 'ean Range Heasurements 5.0 TERRESTRIAL BIOTA 5.1 Hilk pCi/1 C 3G 36 21.G ND"64 II-40: Contiol-Davis 30('D64 30') ND-64 Dairy; Boynton Beach, SSP., 55.8 iiillee 44S 2 36 >>(I) 2"3 40l 22 II II II 3 "Sr 2 ~

36 32(E) ND None ND')

'I 4 IZ 2 36 32 ND-.91(S II-03: Headowbrook Dairy; <1 ND-.91 HD-.36 14i ciiIee, SSW 5.2.1 road (g) pci/kg "Sr 7 ~

ND Hone Citrus 'ssr 7 22 10-32 I!-22: Lentz Crovce, VS 1 ~ SSW 5a5 iiilles I secs 13 ND-90 H-24i Poster Croves, 90 US I; WIN 5.35 aillde 2.2.2 ~aaad - Ledf pci/kg (h) 'Cs 330 II-41 i 7609 Indian River 30"

~Ve etaelea Drive I WSW, 2 iiiiles 44S 43 7609 Indian River H-41.'rive I WSW, 2 iiiilee

~ sgr ND None

All indicator Location Mlth Hi hest Pean Control '{umber of of location~ Nonroutine Number Locations Sample Location ~

Vediu~ or Pathway Analysis Reported Sampled Unit for Sites San:pl es Analyses ttean Range Distance and Oirection llean Range liean Range Heasureawnts (a) If-32: Depart) cnt oE Health and Rchabil t'ative Se vice , Ento ology,L boratory; East of V.S. 1, Vera Beac , Nnf, 19 mil s (b) ND: Hone det" ctable (c) Blue Crab (d ) Mullet (e) Control samp e is H 40, Davis airy, B ynton Bca h, SSE,."55. miles (E) Two samples d stroye in Lab Ac ident (g) Grapefruit, C trus, (h) Turnip Greens (i) All analysis cra: nAetectab e excep Eor week of March 2 , 1978. Vcckly c posite for that wack gav Iodin concc ration of 0.07+0.02 Ci/m h)1 analysis ut tw were non-d tectabl for Iodi e 131. Th H 03 mi k sample. ha week of 3-10-78 had a concen ration' 0.91. .46 pci/1 ~

($ )