ML12241A230: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project = TAC:ME9348, TAC:ME9347, TAC:ME9349
| project = TAC:ME9347, TAC:ME9348, TAC:ME9349
| stage = Acceptance Review
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Gibson, LaurenTo:Russell.Stroud@aps.com
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Gibson, Lauren To: Russell.Stroud@aps.com


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RESULTS FOR CYBER SECURITY IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE DEVIATION LICENSEAMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NO. ME9347, 8, 9)Date:Tuesday, August 28, 2012 9:00:00 AM
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RESULTS FOR CYBER SECURITY IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE DEVIATION LICENSEAMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NO. ME9347, 8, 9)
Date:Tuesday, August 28, 2012 9:00:00 AM


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RESULTS FOR CYBER SECURITY IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE DEVIATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NO. ME9347, 8, 9)
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RESULTS FOR CYBER SECURITY IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE DEVIATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NO. ME9347, 8, 9)


By letter dated August 10, 2012, Arizona Public Service, the licensee, submitted a license amendment for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. The purpose of this e-mail is toprovide the results of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identifywhether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
By letter dated August 10, 2012, Arizona Public Service, the licensee, submitted a license amendment for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
The purpose of this e-mail is toprovide the results of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.
The acceptance review is also intended to identifywhether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.


The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and made an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance reviewas compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed,you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and made an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance reviewas compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review.
If additional information is needed,you will be advised by separate correspondence.


If you have any questions, please contact me.
If you have any questions, please contact me.


Lauren K. GibsonProject ManagerDivision of Operating Reactor LicensingU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission(301) 415-1056  
Lauren K. Gibson Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-1056}}
 
}}

Revision as of 07:46, 26 July 2018

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance Review Email for Cyber Security Implementation Schedule Deviation License Amendment Request (TAC ME9347, ME9348, and ME9349)
ML12241A230
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 08/28/2012
From: Gibson L K
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Russell S
Arizona Public Service Co
Gibson L K
References
TAC ME9347, TAC ME9348, TAC ME9349
Download: ML12241A230 (1)


Text

From:Gibson, Lauren To: Russell.Stroud@aps.com

Subject:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RESULTS FOR CYBER SECURITY IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE DEVIATION LICENSEAMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NO. ME9347, 8, 9)

Date:Tuesday, August 28, 2012 9:00:00 AM

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RESULTS FOR CYBER SECURITY IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE DEVIATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NO. ME9347, 8, 9)

By letter dated August 10, 2012, Arizona Public Service, the licensee, submitted a license amendment for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.

The purpose of this e-mail is toprovide the results of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request.

The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.

The acceptance review is also intended to identifywhether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and made an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.

Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance reviewas compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review.

If additional information is needed,you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Lauren K. Gibson Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-1056