ML15282A474: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam: | fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam: | ||
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,. | Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,. | ||
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, | : 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*) | ||
+/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*) | |||
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*) | .,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*) | ||
Mic£1Q£) | Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c. | ||
r 9Lg-J;:;- | |||
' --*. | ' --*. | ||
: d. NRC Supervisor | : d. NRC Supervisor | ||
Line 33: | Line 30: | ||
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented | : 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented | ||
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) | : 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) | ||
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, | : 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified | ||
+/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified | |||
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature | : 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature | ||
: a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1 | : a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1 | ||
Line 46: | Line 42: | ||
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam: | fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam: | ||
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,. | Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,. | ||
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, | : 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*) | ||
+/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*) | |||
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*) | .,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*) | ||
Mic£1Q£) | Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c. | ||
r 9Lg-J;:;- | |||
' --*. | ' --*. | ||
: d. NRC Supervisor | : d. NRC Supervisor | ||
Line 60: | Line 53: | ||
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented | : 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented | ||
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) | : 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) | ||
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, | : 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified | ||
+/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified | |||
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature | : 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature | ||
: a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1 | : a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1 |
Revision as of 22:38, 8 July 2018
ML15282A474 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Fermi ![]() |
Issue date: | 08/24/2015 |
From: | Beilby M E NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
To: | Detroit Edison, Co |
Shared Package | |
ML15268A032 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML15282A474 (3) | |
Text
2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES ES-403 Facility:
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)
Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c.
' --*.
- d. NRC Supervisor
(*) /J17!JtiA
- n _/£3 -.. .Pi/ {/ ..... (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u}
1). Exam Level: Item Description
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature
- a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1
/ly6--b. Form ES-403-1 RO DsRo Initials a b c 7" I /H{d{
7"' NPt f'f / tntq .f 'r rJp,. r rJf\ I fl1ti3 Date q{t/15 I FaciliTy Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(")
If! I tiul el t f5J 'e fb{ir.
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
th//J/' (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6 2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES ES-403 Facility:
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)
Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c.
' --*.
- d. NRC Supervisor
(*) /J17!JtiA
- n _/£3 -.. .Pi/ {/ ..... (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u}
1). Exam Level: Item Description
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature
- a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1
/ly6--b. Form ES-403-1 RO DsRo Initials a b c 7" I /H{d{
7"' NPt f'f / tntq .f 'r rJp,. r rJf\ I fl1ti3 Date q{t/15 I FaciliTy Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(")
If! I tiul el t f5J 'e fb{ir.
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
th//J/' (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6