ML15282A474: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.  
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)  
+/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)  
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)
Mic£1Q£)
Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c.  
r 9Lg-J;:;-
: c.  
' --*.  
' --*.  
: d. NRC Supervisor  
: d. NRC Supervisor  
Line 33: Line 30:
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented  
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented  
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)  
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified  
+/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified  
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature  
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature  
: a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1  
: a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1  
Line 46: Line 42:
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:
fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.  
Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)  
+/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"''ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)  
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)
.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)
Mic£1Q£)
Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c.  
r 9Lg-J;:;-
: c.  
' --*.  
' --*.  
: d. NRC Supervisor  
: d. NRC Supervisor  
Line 60: Line 53:
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented  
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented  
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)  
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,  
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified  
+/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified  
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature  
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature  
: a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1  
: a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1  

Revision as of 22:38, 8 July 2018

2015 Fermi Power Plant Initial License Examination Administrative Files
ML15282A474
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/24/2015
From: Beilby M E
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Detroit Edison, Co
Shared Package
ML15268A032 List:
References
Download: ML15282A474 (3)


Text

2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES ES-403 Facility:

fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:

Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)

.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)

Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c.

' --*.

d. NRC Supervisor

(*) /J17!JtiA

  • n _/£3 -.. .Pi/ {/ ..... (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u}

1). Exam Level: Item Description

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature
a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1

/ly6--b. Form ES-403-1 RO DsRo Initials a b c 7" I /H{d{

7"' NPt f'f / tntq .f 'r rJp,. r rJf\ I fl1ti3 Date q{t/15 I FaciliTy Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner(")

If! I tiul el t f5J 'e fb{ir.

d. NRC Supervisor(*)

th//J/' (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6 2015 FERMI POWER PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES ES-403 Facility:

fetcm i Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Date of Exam:

Exam Level: Item Description Form ES-403-1 RO C0'sRO D Initials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading {'I' {>I) 7"' 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented r' rJPr 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ..,.

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 7' tVA-5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified f1f / NA. 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date A.;z a. Grader tni Ke Oo"ti It"' ;, LLf>: ' b. Facility Reviewer(*)

.,...,. 8et!a:T'$ '/'11-5 NRC Chief Examiner(*)

Mic£1Q£) r 9Lg-J;:;-c.

' --*.

d. NRC Supervisor

(*) /J17!JtiA

  • n _/£3 -.. .Pi/ {/ ..... (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: U?. m i Date of Exam:g/u}

1). Exam Level: Item Description

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature
a. Grader tn1 Ke {)()') 1

/ly6--b. Form ES-403-1 RO DsRo Initials a b c 7" I /H{d{

7"' NPt f'f / tntq .f 'r rJp,. r rJf\ I fl1ti3 Date q{t/15 I FaciliTy Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner(")

If! I tiul el t f5J 'e fb{ir.

d. NRC Supervisor(*)

th//J/' (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6