ML17024A402: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:SECURITY-RELATED | {{#Wiki_filter:SECURITY-RELATED | ||
INFORMATION | INFORMATION | ||
-WITHHOLD | -WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED | ||
UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED | FROM ENCLOSURE, THIS TRANSMITTAL | ||
FROM ENCLOSURE, | DOCUMENT IS DECONTROLLED | ||
THIS TRANSMITTAL | |||
DOCUMENT | |||
IS DECONTROLLED | |||
Serial: RNP-RA/16-0100 | Serial: RNP-RA/16-0100 | ||
JAN 2' 2017 United States Nuclear Regulatory | JAN 2' 2017 United States Nuclear Regulatory | ||
Commission | Commission | ||
ATTN: Document | ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 | ||
Control Desk Washington, | H. 8. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED | ||
DC 20555-0001 | LICENSE NO. DPR-23 RESPONSE TO APPARENT VIOLATION | ||
H. 8. ROBINSON | |||
STEAM ELECTRIC | |||
PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED | |||
LICENSE NO. DPR-23 RESPONSE | |||
TO APPARENT | |||
VIOLATION | |||
IN NRC INSPECTION | IN NRC INSPECTION | ||
REPORT 0500026112016404, | REPORT 0500026112016404, EA-16-227 | ||
EA-16-227 | |||
Ernest J. Kapopou/os | Ernest J. Kapopou/os | ||
Jr. H B Robinson | Jr. H B Robinson Steam Electnc Plant Unit 2 Site V i ce President | ||
Steam Electnc Plant Unit 2 Site | Duke Energy Progress 3581 West Entrance Road Harlsvt 1/e , SC 29550 0 843 857 1701 F 843 8571319 Ernie..Kapopoulu | ||
Duke Energy Progress | l(i, Ju.kt!*ettergy.com 10 CFR 2.201 Reference: | ||
3581 West Entrance | |||
Road | |||
l(i,Ju.kt!*ettergy.com 10 CFR 2.201 Reference: | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | ||
Commission | Commission | ||
Letter to Duke Energy Progress, | Letter to Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Office of Investigations | ||
LLC, Office of Investigations | |||
Report 2-2016-001; | Report 2-2016-001; | ||
H.B. Robinson | H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2-NRG Inspection | ||
Steam Electric | Report 0500026112016404, Dated December 27, 2016 Ladies and Gentlemen: | ||
Plant, Unit No. 2-NRG Inspection | |||
Report 0500026112016404, | |||
Dated December | |||
27, 2016 Ladies and Gentlemen: | |||
By the referenced | By the referenced | ||
letter, the Nuclear Regulatory | letter, the Nuclear Regulatory | ||
Commission | Commission (NRC) notified Duke Energy Progress, LLC, of an Apparent Violation (AV) 0500026112016404-01, Security Safeguards | ||
(NRC) notified | Control, associated | ||
Duke Energy Progress, | with a security incident at the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 (RNP). The letter states the AV is being considered | ||
LLC, of an Apparent | |||
Violation | |||
(AV) 0500026112016404-01, | |||
Security | |||
Safeguards | |||
Control, | |||
associated | |||
with a security | |||
incident | |||
at the H. B. Robinson | |||
Steam Electric | |||
Plant, Unit No. 2 (RNP). The letter states the AV is being considered | |||
for an escalated | for an escalated | ||
enforcement | enforcement | ||
action in accordance | action in accordance | ||
with the NRC Enforcement | with the NRC Enforcement | ||
Policy. RNP accepts the apparent | Policy. RNP accepts the apparent violation | ||
violation | |||
and agrees with the conclusion | and agrees with the conclusion | ||
reached in the investigation | reached in the investigation | ||
Line 88: | Line 57: | ||
(01) concerning | (01) concerning | ||
activities | activities | ||
at RNP. The letter allows for a response | at RNP. The letter allows for a response to the AV in writing prior to the NRC making its final enforcement | ||
to the AV in writing prior to the NRC making its final enforcement | |||
decision. | decision. | ||
The response | The response to the violation | ||
to the violation | |||
is presented | is presented | ||
in the enclosure | in the enclosure | ||
to this letter. It is noted, the enclosure contains Security-Related | to this letter. It is noted, the enclosure contains Security-Related | ||
Information, | Information, withhold from public disclosure | ||
withhold | |||
from public disclosure | |||
under 10 CFR 2.390, in accordance | under 10 CFR 2.390, in accordance | ||
with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1). | with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1). | ||
SECURITY-RELATED | SECURITY-RELATED | ||
INFORMATION | INFORMATION | ||
-WITHHOLD | -WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED | ||
UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED | FROM ENCLOSURE, THIS TRANSMITTAL | ||
FROM ENCLOSURE, | DOCUMENT IS DECONTROLLED | ||
THIS TRANSMITTAL | |||
DOCUMENT | |||
IS DECONTROLLED | |||
SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION | ||
-WITHHOLD | -WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED | ||
UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED | FROM ENCLOSURE, THIS TRANSMITTAL | ||
FROM ENCLOSURE, | DOCUMENT IS DECONTROLLED | ||
THIS TRANSMITTAL | |||
DOCUMENT | |||
IS DECONTROLLED | |||
United States Nuclear Regulatory | United States Nuclear Regulatory | ||
Commission | Commission | ||
Line 121: | Line 80: | ||
Page 2 of 2 The identified | Page 2 of 2 The identified | ||
deficiencies | deficiencies | ||
related to the security | related to the security incident at RNP were entered in the station corrective | ||
incident | |||
at RNP were entered in the station corrective | |||
action program and a root cause evaluation | action program and a root cause evaluation | ||
was performed. | was performed. | ||
Based on this evaluation, | Based on this evaluation, the enclosure | ||
the enclosure | contains the response details which includes; | ||
contains | |||
the response | |||
details which includes; | |||
(1) restatement | (1) restatement | ||
of the apparent | of the apparent violation, (2) the reason for the apparent violation, (3) the date when full compliance | ||
violation, | was restored, and (4) the prompt and comprehensive | ||
(2) the reason for the apparent | |||
violation, | |||
(3) the date when full compliance | |||
was restored, | |||
and (4) the prompt and comprehensive | |||
corrective | corrective | ||
actions. Duke Energy acknowledges | actions. Duke Energy acknowledges | ||
Line 144: | Line 93: | ||
of the issue and the need for lasting and effective | of the issue and the need for lasting and effective | ||
corrective | corrective | ||
actions. | actions. We further acknowledge | ||
We further acknowledge | |||
and align with the significance | and align with the significance | ||
of the issue previously | of the issue previously | ||
Line 153: | Line 101: | ||
act with integrity | act with integrity | ||
and communicate | and communicate | ||
with candor. Any careless | with candor. Any careless disregard | ||
disregard | |||
for requirements | for requirements | ||
or deliberate | or deliberate | ||
violation | violation | ||
of requirements | of requirements | ||
are not to be tolerated | are not to be tolerated. Duke Energy acknowledges | ||
. Duke Energy acknowledges | |||
the willful aspects of this issue and understands | the willful aspects of this issue and understands | ||
that the regulatory | that the regulatory | ||
program is based on licensee | program is based on licensee employees | ||
employees | |||
acting with integrity | acting with integrity | ||
and further acknowledges | and further acknowledges | ||
the need for lasting and effective | the need for lasting and effective | ||
corrective | corrective | ||
actions. | actions. There are no regulatory | ||
There are no regulatory | |||
commitments | commitments | ||
associated | associated | ||
Line 176: | Line 120: | ||
regarding | regarding | ||
this matter, please contact Mr. Tony Pila, Nuclear Regulatory | this matter, please contact Mr. Tony Pila, Nuclear Regulatory | ||
Affairs, | Affairs, at (843) 857-1409. | ||
at (843) 857-1409. | |||
Ernest J. Kapopoulos | Ernest J. Kapopoulos | ||
Jr. Site Vice President | Jr. Site Vice President | ||
EJK/am Enclosure: | EJK/am Enclosure: | ||
RESPONSE | RESPONSE TO APPARENT VIOLATION | ||
TO APPARENT | |||
VIOLATION | |||
IN NRC INSPECTION | IN NRC INSPECTION | ||
REPORT 05000261/2016404, | REPORT 05000261/2016404, EA-16-227 | ||
EA-16-227 | cc: NRC Resident Inspector, HBRSEP Unit No. 2 Anthony T. Gady, Director of Reactor Safety, NRC , Region II NRC Regional Administrator, NRC, Region II Dennis Galvin, NRC Project Manager, NRR SECURITY-RELATED | ||
cc: NRC Resident | |||
Inspector, | |||
HBRSEP Unit No. 2 Anthony T. Gady, Director | |||
of Reactor Safety, NRC, Region II NRC Regional | |||
Administrator, | |||
NRC, Region II Dennis Galvin, NRC Project Manager, | |||
NRR SECURITY-RELATED | |||
INFORMATION | INFORMATION | ||
-WITHHOLD | -WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED | ||
UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED | FROM ENCLOSURE, THIS TRANSMITTAL | ||
FROM ENCLOSURE, | DOCUMENT IS DECONTROLLED | ||
THIS TRANSMITTAL | |||
DOCUMENT | |||
IS DECONTROLLED | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 02:34, 8 July 2018
ML17024A402 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Robinson |
Issue date: | 01/24/2017 |
From: | Kapopoulos E J Duke Energy Progress |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Shared Package | |
ML17024A401 | List: |
References | |
EA-16-227, RNP-RA/16-0100 | |
Download: ML17024A402 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000261/2016404
Text
SECURITY-RELATED
INFORMATION
-WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED
FROM ENCLOSURE, THIS TRANSMITTAL
DOCUMENT IS DECONTROLLED
Serial: RNP-RA/16-0100
JAN 2' 2017 United States Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
H. 8. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED
LICENSE NO. DPR-23 RESPONSE TO APPARENT VIOLATION
IN NRC INSPECTION
REPORT 0500026112016404, EA-16-227
Ernest J. Kapopou/os
Jr. H B Robinson Steam Electnc Plant Unit 2 Site V i ce President
Duke Energy Progress 3581 West Entrance Road Harlsvt 1/e , SC 29550 0 843 857 1701 F 843 8571319 Ernie..Kapopoulu
l(i, Ju.kt!*ettergy.com 10 CFR 2.201 Reference:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Letter to Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Office of Investigations
Report 2-2016-001;
H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2-NRG Inspection
Report 0500026112016404, Dated December 27, 2016 Ladies and Gentlemen:
By the referenced
letter, the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) notified Duke Energy Progress, LLC, of an Apparent Violation (AV)0500026112016404-01, Security Safeguards
Control, associated
with a security incident at the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 (RNP). The letter states the AV is being considered
for an escalated
enforcement
action in accordance
with the NRC Enforcement
Policy. RNP accepts the apparent violation
and agrees with the conclusion
reached in the investigation
completed
by the NRC Office of Investigations
(01) concerning
activities
at RNP. The letter allows for a response to the AV in writing prior to the NRC making its final enforcement
decision.
The response to the violation
is presented
in the enclosure
to this letter. It is noted, the enclosure contains Security-Related
Information, withhold from public disclosure
under 10 CFR 2.390, in accordance
with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1).
SECURITY-RELATED
INFORMATION
-WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED
FROM ENCLOSURE, THIS TRANSMITTAL
DOCUMENT IS DECONTROLLED
SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
-WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED
FROM ENCLOSURE, THIS TRANSMITTAL
DOCUMENT IS DECONTROLLED
United States Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Serial: RNP-RN16-0100
Page 2 of 2 The identified
deficiencies
related to the security incident at RNP were entered in the station corrective
action program and a root cause evaluation
was performed.
Based on this evaluation, the enclosure
contains the response details which includes;
(1) restatement
of the apparent violation, (2) the reason for the apparent violation, (3) the date when full compliance
was restored, and (4) the prompt and comprehensive
corrective
actions. Duke Energy acknowledges
the significance
of the issue and the need for lasting and effective
corrective
actions. We further acknowledge
and align with the significance
of the issue previously
discussed
with the NRC and members of Duke Energy staff. Duke Energy demands employees
and contractors
act with integrity
and communicate
with candor. Any careless disregard
for requirements
or deliberate
violation
of requirements
are not to be tolerated. Duke Energy acknowledges
the willful aspects of this issue and understands
that the regulatory
program is based on licensee employees
acting with integrity
and further acknowledges
the need for lasting and effective
corrective
actions. There are no regulatory
commitments
associated
with this letter. Should you have any questions
regarding
this matter, please contact Mr. Tony Pila, Nuclear Regulatory
Affairs, at (843) 857-1409.
Ernest J. Kapopoulos
Jr. Site Vice President
EJK/am Enclosure:
RESPONSE TO APPARENT VIOLATION
IN NRC INSPECTION
REPORT 05000261/2016404, EA-16-227
cc: NRC Resident Inspector, HBRSEP Unit No. 2 Anthony T. Gady, Director of Reactor Safety, NRC , Region II NRC Regional Administrator, NRC, Region II Dennis Galvin, NRC Project Manager, NRR SECURITY-RELATED
INFORMATION
-WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR 2.390 WHEN SEPARATED
FROM ENCLOSURE, THIS TRANSMITTAL
DOCUMENT IS DECONTROLLED