ML16021A459

Pilgrim - Proposed License Amendment Request to Modify Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Training for the On-Shift Chemistry Technician

ML16021A459
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	01/14/2016
From:	Dent J A Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2.16.001
Download: ML16021A459 (94)

Text

Entegyi Nuclear OPoer SationsIc

• 600 Rocky Hill RoadPyotMA 02360John A. Dent, Jr.Site Vice President January 14, 2016U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Docuriient Control DeskWashington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Proposed License Amendment Request to Modify Emergency ResponseOrganization (ERO) Training for the On-shift Chemistry Technician Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationDocket No. 50-293License No. DPR-35LETTER NUMBER: 2.16.001

Reference:

1. PNPS Letter to NRC,

Subject:

"Emergency Plan Changes to the MinimumStaffing Requirements for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO)", dated July 14, 2006 (2.06.062).

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) hereby proposesto amend Operating License No. DPR-35 for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS).The proposed license amendment reflects a change in the Emergency ResponseOrganization (ERO) as it relates to staff training requirements applicable to the on-shiftChemistry Technician identified in Table B-I of the Site Emergency Plan (SEP). Thischange was reviewed by Entergy and determined to b.e a reduction in effectiveness ofthe PNPS SEP. This change i~s submitted to the NRC Staff in accordance with 10 CER50.54(q).

The proposed change has been evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 (a)(1).using criteria specified in 10 CFR 50.92(c),

and Entergy has determined that thischange involves no significant hazards consideration.

The bases for this determination are included in Attachment 1, which provides a description of the proposed change, abackground discussion, a technical

analysis, a regulatory

analysis, and anenvironmental consideration review. Attachment 2 provides a copy of the current SEPTable B-I, "Minimum Staffing Requirements for the Emergency ResponseOrganization."

Attachment 3 provides a comparison of proposed training and trainingpreviously proposed in letter Reference

1. Attachment 4 provides the current PNPSEmergency Response On-shift Staffing Analysis (OSA).

Letter 2.16.001Page 2Entergy requests approval of the proposed amendment by January 14, 2017. Onceapproved, Entergy will implement this amendment days.If you have any questions regarding the subject matter, please contact Everett P.Perkins at (508) 830-8323.

This letter contains no new or revised regulatory commitments.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Executed on the /'4" day of (_/2,j z ~,2016.A. Dent, Jr.;ite Vice President Attachment 1: Analysis of Proposed License Amendment Attachment 2: PNPS Emergency Plan Table B-I, "Minimum Staffing Requirements forthe Emergency Response Organization."

Attachment 3: Chemistry Technician

Training, 2006 Submittal vs 2016 Submittal Attachment 4: PNPS Emergency Response Organization On-shift Staffing Analysiscc: Ms. Booma Venkataraman, Project ManagerDivision of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission one White Flint North O-8C2-A11555 Rockville PikeRockville, MD 20852Regional Administrator, Region 1U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2100 Renaissance Blvd, Suite 100King of Prussia, PA 19406-2713 NRC Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationJohn Priest, Director, Massachusetts Department of Public HealthRadiation Control ProgramCommonwealth of Massachusetts 529 Main Street, Suite 1 M2ACharlestown, MA 02129-1121 John Giarrusso, Jr.Planning and Preparedness Section ChiefMass Emergency Management Agency400 Worcester RoadFramingham, MA 01702 ATTACHMENT 1To Entergy Letter No. 2.16.001Analysis of Proposed License Amendment (10 Pages)

Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS1.0 DESCRIPTION 2.0 PROPOSED CHANGE3.0 BACKGROUND 4.0 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS5.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW5.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria 5.2 No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination 5.3 Environmental Consideration

6.0 REFERENCES

1 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT

1.0 DESCRIPTION

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, "Amendment of License or Construction Permit at Requestof Holder,"

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) requests Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff review and approval of a revision to the Pilgrim Nuclear PowerPlant (PNPS) Site Emergency Plan (SEP) to decrease the Emergency ResponseOrganization (ERO) staff training provided for the "on-site" Chemistry Technician.

Entergy has reviewed the proposed changes against the standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)and requirements in 10 CER 50, Appendix E, "Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities."

2.0 PROPOSED CHANGEEntergy is proposing to revise the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) stafftraining requirements identified for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician.

Attachment 3identifies the proposed staff training requirements and provides a comparison to thetraining requirements previously identified in our 2006 submittal to the NRC Staff, datedJuly 14, 2006 (Reference 6.1).Subsequent review of the Pilgrim On-shift Staffing Analysis (OSA) dated December2012 (Reference 6.3) and the job performance requirements for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician indicate that previously identified training tasks and task qualification functions listed in the 2006 ERO submittal are not necessary for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician to support the "on-shift" RP Technician function/position at the onset of anERO event._Proposed Trainingc ChancieWe are proposing that the scope of the Chemistry Technician job training that isneeded to support initial "on-shift" RP Technician functions be limited to thefollowing general RP support tasks:o Perform on-site radiation surveyso Perform on-site contamination surveyso Set up the Operations Support Center (RP Technician work area)o Issue dosimetry A list of plant specific training to support these functions is provided in Attachment

3.3.0 BACKGROUND

The specific standard for establishing a shift emergency organization to respond toemergency events appears in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) which states, in part, "On-shift facility2 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001licensee responsibilities for emergency response are unambiguously

defined, adequatestaffing to provide initial facility accident response in key functional areas is maintained at all times..."

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV, requires licensee emergency plans to contain,in part, the organization for coping with radiological emergencies and the activation ofthe emergency organization.

NUREG-0654 (Reference 6.2),Section II.B, "Onsite Emergency Organization,"

presentsguidance for meeting these requirements.

The guidance describes the onsiteemergency organization, including the staffing requirements found in Table B-I,"Minimum Staffing Requirements for NRC Licensees for Nuclear Power PlantEmergencies."

This table specifies a minimum of ten on-shift responders in four MajorFunctional Areas. It also specifies seven on-shift response tasks where the duties maybe performed by shift personnel who are assigned other tasks (i.e., there are nodedicated responders to perform these tasks). -The on-shift staff must be able to cope with a spectrum of events until augmenting EROpersonnel arrive in accordance with the site's emergency plan commitments.

Theaugmenting ERO responders assume many managerial, engineering, andadministrative duties from the on-shift personnel, allowing on-shift personnel to focusmore fully on plant operations.

NUREG-0654 guidance recommends that there be, inaddition to on-shift personnel, 30 and 60-minute responders.

On November 23, 2011, the NRC published a final rule in the Federal Registeramending certain' emergency preparedness (EP) requirements in its regulations thatgovern domestic licensing of production and utilization facilities (Reference 6.5). Thisfinal rule amended 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.A, "Organization,"

toaddress the assignment of tasks or responsibilities to on-shift ERO personnel that couldpotentially overburden them and prevent the timely performance of their emergency plan functions.

Specifically,Section IV.A.9 states that licensees shall perform "... adetailed analysis demonstrating that on-shift personnel assigned emergency planimplementation functions are not assigned responsibilities that would prevent the timelyperformance of their assigned functions as specified in the emergency plan."Coincident with the rule change in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.A.9, the NRCissued NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, "Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for NuclearPower Plants" (Reference 6.6). This Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) provides information relevant to performing the on-shift staffing analysis.

The ISG states that the NuclearEnergy Institute (NEI) developed the document NEI 10-05, "Assessment of On-ShiftEmergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities,"

to establish a standardmethodology for a licensee to perform the required staffing

analysis, and that the NRCreviewed NEI 10-05 and found it to be an acceptable methodology for this purpose.The ISG also indicates that the completed staffing analyses are required to be part ofthe emergency plan and the results documented and submitted to the NRC inaccordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q)(5).

3 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.0014.0 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS4.1 Pilgrim-Specific Background Information The Pilgrim SEP (Rev 0) was originally issued in 1983. The SEP Table B-I plantstaffing figure, indicated that one (1) "on-shift" RP Technician and one (1) "on-shift" 1Chemistry Technician would be available for ERO response to support in-plant surveysand radio chemistry tasks under the Radiological Accident Assessment functional area.The SEP Table B-I was updated in 1990 (rev 10) and indicated a staff change from one(1) to two (2) "on-shift" RP Technicians in the Accident Assessment Support functional area. The purpose of the revision was identified as an editorial table change to creditthe additional RP Technician that was listed in the Protective Action(s)

(in Plant)functional area of the table and "to better reflect the format" of NUREG 0654. This SEPrevision was submitted to the NRC (Reference 6.7).In a letter dated July 14, 2006 (Reference 6.1), Entergy proposed to the NRC Staff tosubstitute the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician for the second "on-shift" RP Technician tohandleERO responsibilities during the first thirty (30) minutes of an event. As part ofthat proposal, Entergy stated that PNPS would (1) provide additional training for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician(s);

and (2) remove the second "on-shift" RP Technician from the shift when appropriate training was provided for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technicians.

This prior SEP submittal supported the removal of one (1) of two (2) "on-shift" RP Technicians listed in SEP, Table B-I, "Minimum Staffing Requirements for theEmergency Response Organization."

This Table B-i change was consistent with ouroriginal 1983 SEP and the guidance contained in NUREG 0654/FEMA-REP-I.,

Rev. 1,dated November 1980 (Reference 6.2).In a letter dated February 5, 2007 (Reference 6.4), the NRC Staff responded to our July14, 2006 request.

The letter stated "The NRC staff has concluded that incorporation ofthe proposed changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the PNPS Emergency Planand the plan, as changed, continues to meet the standards of Section 50.47(b) and therequirements of Appendix E to Title 10 Part 50 of the Code of federal Regulations.

Thebasis for our conclusion is contained in the enclosed safety evaluation.

In light of theabove, no NRC approval is necessary."

On the top of Page 3, the NRC Staff's SErestates the conclusion that the incorporation of the proposed changes do not decreasethe effectiveness of the PNPS Emergency Plan and the plan, as changed, continues tomeet standards of Section 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.At Pilgrim Station since 2007, an on-shift Chemistry Technician supplements the on-shift Radiation Protection (RP) Technician in fulfilling the RP duties of the ERO duringthe early phase of ERO activation.

Four (4) additional RP Technicians are currently required to report to the site within 30 minutes, with the addition of four (4) more RPTechnicians reporting to the site in 60 minutes.

These additional RP Technicians provide support roles in the ERO Accident Assessment functional area after the first 304 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001minutes.

In Reference 6.1, Entergy outlined to the NRC Staff the specific training to beprovided to the Chemistry Technicians to support their fulfillment of the RP role for theearly phase of ERG activation.

Recently, Entergy discovered we were not providing the in-depth training for the on-shiftChemistry Technicians as documented in our letter dated July 14, 2006. A condition report was written and immediate actions were taken to address the issue. Specifically, a second RP Technician was added to each shift to restore the staffing levels that weredefined prior to F'ebruary 5, 2007 Table B-I revision.

Subsequently, Entergy has determined we could provide a reduced scope of RPtraining for the on-shift Chemistry Technicians from that previously proposed in our2006 ERG submittal.

The reduction in training is supported by the 2012 SEP On-shiftStaffing An alysis (GSA) which is provided in Attachment 4 (Reference 6.3). The OSAevaluated the on-shift ERG staff positions and verified that assigned personnel cancomplete required ERG functions/tasks in a timely manner; The GSA does not rely onthe on-shift Chemistry Technician to perform the required ERG functions/tasks specifically assigned to the on-shift RP Technician.

Entergy is proposing to reduce the level of training provided to the "on-shift" Chemistry Technicians who may be relied on to perform an initial ERG RP Technician supportrole.*The scope of training proposed in 2006 is documented in Reference 6.1 andsummarized in Attachment 3.*The scope of training proposed in 2016 is identified in Attachment 3 and involvestraining in the following specific task areas.o Perform on-site radiation surveyso Perform on-site contamination surveyso Set up the Operations Support Center (RP Technician work area)o Issue dosimetry This revised training scope is consistent with the responsibilities and actions that wouldbe required of the on-shift Chemistry Technician during the first 30 minutes of an ERGevent consistent with the Gn-shift Staffing Analysis.

4.2 Analysis of Reduced ERG Training Requirements for the "On-shift" Chemistry Technician The GSA provides the basis for a proposed reduction in on-site Chemistry Technician Training.

Section 2.14 of NEI 10-05 states "Although developed to meet therequirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.A.9, the staffing assessment methodology may be used to evaluate proposed changes to on-shift staffing levels oraugmented ERG response times. For example, an analysis could be performed with adesired response time for the augmenting ERG (e.g., 90 minutes),

and the results thenused to support the basis for changing a staffing or augmentation time commitment."

5 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001The OSA indicates that the primary responsibility of the on-shift Chemistry Technician ischemistry/radiochemistry sampling; however no chemistry sampling tasks were notedas being time critical in the first 90 minutes of~any of the analyzed events. As such, theChemistry Technician is available to assist the RP Technician in performance ofdirected RP task work in the Operations Accident Assessment or Protective Actionfunctional areas as determined appropriate by the Shift Manager.The OSA has ensured that the PNPS ERO team members can accomplish the requiredmission in the first 90 minutes of ERO activation with the staffing and training of on-shiftstaff members proposed herein. The OSA assumed that the RP and Chemistry Technicians are qualified to perform the range of tasks expected of their position.

TheOSA does not credit additional RP training for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician inorder to ensure that the "on-shift" RP Technician can complete assigned emergency plan functions in a timely manner. As such, assignment of any additional RP training tothe "on-shift" Chemistry Technician is not necessary and is considered to be anenhancement to the overall ERO organization.

The OSA is included in this submittal as Attachment

4. Based on the OSA, theproposed reduction in "on-shift Chemistry Technician training is acceptable and doesnot adversely affect the effectiveness of the PNPS Emergency Plan or the ability ofassigned on-shift personnel to perform their assigned functions.

5.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW5.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria The regulatory standards, requirements and guidance involving ERO staffing andaugmentation are as follows:,

• 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2)

-On-shift facility licensee responsibilities for emergency response are unambiguously

defined, adequate staffing to provide initial facilityaccident response in key functional areas is maintained at all times, timelyaugmentation of response capabilities is available and the interfaces amongvarious onsite response activities and offsite support and response activities arespecified.

• 10 CFR 50, Appendix E,Section IV.A (in part) -The organization for coping withradiological emergencies shall be described, including definition of authorities, responsibilities, and duties of individuals assigned to the licensee's emergency organization and the means for notification of such individuals in the event of anemergency.

• NRC Regulatory Guide 1.101, "Emergency Response Planning andPreparedness for Nuclear Power Reactors,"

Revision 5, Section C, stated in part"The criteria and recommendations in this regulatory guide are methods that the6 Attachment 1Ito PNPS Letter 2.16.001NRC staff considers acceptable for complying with the requirements in AppendixE to 10 CFR Part 50 and the planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) that must be*met in onsite and offsite emergency response plans. These criteria provide abasis for NRC licensees and State and local governments to develop acceptable radiological emergency plans and improve emergency preparedness."

In NUREG-0654,Section II, "Planning Standards and Evaluation Criteria,"

Evaluation Criteria ll.B.1 and ll.B.5 address the 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) planning standard.

Evaluation Criteria ll.B. 1 specifies the on-site emergency organization of plant staff personnel forall shifts, and its relation to the responsibilities and duties of the normal shiftcomplement.

Evaluation Criteria l1.B.5 states, in part, that:Each licensee shall specify the positions or title and major tasks to be performed by the persons to be assigned to the functional areas of emergency activity.

Foremergency situations, specific assignments shall be made for all shifts and forplant staff members, both onsite and away from the site. These assignments shall cover the emergency functions in Table B-1 entitled, "Minimum StaffingRequirements for Nuclear Power Plant Emergencies."

Regulatory Guide 1.219, "Guidance on Making Changes to Emergency Plans forNuclear Power Reactors,"

November 2011, describes a method that the NRC considers to be acceptable to implement the requirements in 10 CFR 50.54(q).

In SectionC.2.a.(2),

the NRC encourages licensees to arrange a conference call with the NRCstaff to clarify 10 CFR 50.54(q) requirements and guidance within this regulatory guidefor EP changes to ERO staffing that reduce the licensee's capability to staff positions.

Entergy completed and issued an OSA to satisfy the requirements in 10 CFR 50,Appendix E,Section IV.A.9 and standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2).

The OSA wasperformed using the guidance in NEI 10-05, which has been reviewed by the NRC andfound to be an acceptable methodology to satisfy the regulatory requirement.

As aresult of the OSA, Revision 44 of the SEP increased the minimum on-shift staffing levelto fourteen (14). There were no changes implemented to revise the current on-shift RPand Chemistry Technician staffing listed in Table B-I. The OSA was conducted assuming a response time of 90 minutes for the augmented ERO to allow the use of thisanalysis for a possible future extension in ERO augmentation times as addressed inSection 2.14 of NEI 10-05. No specific emergency response tasks requiring theaugmented ERO were identified in the OSA prior to the 90-minute period following theemergency declaration.

Based on the considerations above, (1) there is reasonable assurance that the healthand safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner,(2) such activities will continue to be conducted in accordance with the site licensing basis, and (3) the approval of the proposed change will not be inimical to the health andsafety of the public.7 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001In conclusion, Entergy has determined that the proposed training requirement changedoes not require any exemptions or relief from regulatory requirements, and does notaffect conformance with any regulatory requirements or criteria.

5.2 No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Entergy has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involvedwith the proposed amendment by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR50.92, "Issuance of amendment,"

as discussed below:1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability orconsequences of an accident previously evaluated?

Response:

No.The proposed training requirements change has no effect on normal plant operation or on any accident initiator.

The change affects the response to radiological emergencies addressed in the SEP. The ability of the emergency responseorganization to respond adequately to radiological emergencies has been evaluated.

Changes in the training provided to the on-shift organization, such as thereassignment of key on-shift emergency personnel to perform related RP functions, provide assurance of an effective emergency response without competing orconflicting duties. An analysis was also performed on the effect of the proposedchange on the timeliness of performing major tasks for the major functional areas ofthe SEP. The analysis concluded that the reduction in training requirements for the"on-shift" Chemistry Technician to support the initial RP support tasks does not affectthe ability to perform the required RP Technician or Chemistry Technician tasks.Therefore, the change in ERG staff training does not increase the probability orconsequences of an accident previously evaluated.

2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accidentfrom any accident previously evaluated?

Response:

No.The proposed change affects the training requirements for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician and for supplementing onsite personnel in response to a radiological emergency.

It has been evaluated and determined not to significantly affect the abilityto perform required or related functions.

It has no effect on the plant design or on thenormal operation of the plant and does not affect how the plant is physically operatedunder emergency conditions.

The reduction in ERG training requirements for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician in the SEP does not affect the plant operating procedures which are performed by plant staff during all plant conditions.

8 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001No new or different accidents are postulated to occur and there are no changes inany of the accidents previously evaluated.

3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?Response:

No.The proposed change does not affect plant design or method of operation.

10 CFR 50.47 (b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E establish emergency planningstandards and requirements that require adequate

staffing, satisfactory performance of key functional areas and critical tasks, and timely augmentation of the responsecapability.

Since the SEP was originally developed, there have been improvements inthe technology used to support the SEP functions and in the capabilities of onsitepersonnel.

A functional analysis was performed on the effect of the proposed changeon the timeliness of performing major tasks for the functional areas of the SEP. Theanalysis concluded that a reduction in training requirements for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician would not significantly affect the ability to perform the requiredSEP tasks. Thus, the proposed change has been determined not to adversely affectthe ability to meet the emergency planning standards as described in 10 CER 50.47(b) and requirements in 10 CFR 50 Appendix E.The proposed ERO staff training change does not involve a reduction in any marginof safety. The proposed change is consistent with the original and current EROstaffing levels implemented at PNPS.Based on the above, Entergy concludes that the proposed amendment presents nosignificant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c),

and,accordingly, a finding of "no significant hazards consideration" is justified.Environmental Consideration The proposed changes do not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) anychanges in the types or any increase in the amounts of any effluent that may bereleased

offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

Accordingly, the proposed amendment meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51 .22(c)(9).

Therefore, pursuant to 10CFR 51.22(b),

no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needsto be prepared in connection with the proposed amendment.

9 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.0016. REFERENCES 6.1. Entergy Letter to the NRC, "Emergency Plan Changes to the Minimum StaffingRequirements for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO)", dated July 14,2006 (Ltr 2.06.062) 6.2. NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation ofRadiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support ofNuclear Power Plants,"

Revision 1, published November 1980.6.3. Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, 10 CFR 50 Appendix E, On-Shift Staffing AnalysisFinal Report, dated December 20, 2012. Incorporated by reference inEmergency Plan Rev 40, submitted to NRC on January 14, 2013 (Ltr 2.13.001).

6.4. James Kim (USNRC) Letter to Mr. Michael Kansler (Entergy),

"Pilgrim NuclearPower Station -Revision to Emergency Plan to Change Emergency SupportO~rganizatiOn Staffing",

(TAC No. MD2814) dated February 5, 20076.5. Federal Register Volume 76, Number 226, Wednesday, November 23, 2011,Rules and Regulations, "Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations; Final Rule."6.6. NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, "Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for NuclearPower Plants,"

Revision 0, November 2011 (ADAMS Accession NumberML1l13010523).

6.7. Entergy Letter to the NRC, "10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section V,: Submittal ofRevised Emergency Plan or Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures",

datedJanuary 30, 1991 (Ltr 2.91 .007)10 ATTACHMENT 2To Entergy Letter No. 2.16.001PNPS Emergency Plan Table B-I, "Minimum StaffingRequirements for the Emergency Response Organization" (1 Page)

Attachment 2 to PNP.S Letter 2.16.001PNPS EMERGENCY PLANTable B-1i:Minimum Staffino Renuirements for the PNPS ERO-(1)Functional Area Major Task TOnshift Position Title Rs+/-Pos.No.

________________

ponsePlant. Operations Plant Stabilization

+/- 1 Shift Manager On Shift#Assessment of Operational Accident Mitigation 2 Control Room Supervisor On Shift#Aspects 3,4 Lic. Nuc. Plant Operator (2) On Shift#______________________

5.6 Unlic. Nuc. Prant Operator (2)**FB On Shift#"Emerg'ency Direction Emergency Classification j1) Shift Manager On Shift#Emergency Control PARs t (1) Shift Manager On Shift#IEmergency Director 60 mai.

Plant Ops Supv 60 min.Notification and Notification of PNPS, Local, (1) Shift Manager On Shift#Communications Commonwealth, and Federal personnel 7 Unlic. Nuc. Plant Operator On Shift#and Maintain Communications Offsite Communicator 30 min.EOF Communicator 60 min.ENS Communicator 60 mai.Rad Accident Assessment!....

EOF Direction EOF Managter, 60 mai.Ops Accident Assessment Offsite Dose Assessment (8) RP Technician***

On Shift#Support (9) Radio Chem. Technician**"

On Shift#Radiolog:ical Assessment Coord 30 mai.Offsite Surveys OMT Member (2) 30 mai.OMT Member (2) 60 min.Onsite and'ln-plan't Surveys 8 RP Technician On Shift#RP Technician (2) 30 min.RP Technician (2) 60 mmn.Chemistry

/ Radiochemistry 9 Radio Chem. Technician On Shlft#_____Radio Chem. Technician 60 mai.Plant System Engineering TSC / OSC Direction Emergency Plant Manager 60 mai.Repair and Corrective Actions Technical Support 10 Engineer (Shift Control Rm)* On Shift#Engineer (Reactor) 30 mai.Engineer (Mechanical) 60 mai._________________________Englineer (Electrical) 60 min.Eguipment Repairs _____Nuclear Maint. Technician 30 min.Corrective Actions Nuclear Maint, Technician 60 main11 Unlic. Nuc. Plant Operator On Shift#12 Nuc. Plant Reactor Operatorm*FB On Shift#Nuc. Plant Reactor Operator 60 min.Nuclear Maint. (ElectnicalX2) 30 mai.Nuclear Maint. (Electrical) 60 min.___________________

________________________________Nuclear Control Technician(2) 30 mai.Protective Actions (In Plant) Radiation Protection, Access Control, (8), (9) RP Technician (2)*0 On Shift#RP Coverage, Personnel Monitoring, RP Technician (2) 30 mai.and Dosimetry

_____RP Technician (2) 60 mai.Fire Fighting 13, 14 Fire Brigade*,

(3 **, 2 [NLO or Sec]) On Shift#____________________

_____Plymouth Fire Dept. On CallRescue Ops and First Aid On Shitt#___________________

________________________Ambulance Service ... On CallSite Access Control and Security Security Force* On Shift#Personnel Accountability

_____________________un onirt -person as saiu ro oe on snurt wnen, ounng normar or au~nonrzeo oventime nours, that person is witnin tiePNPS owner controlled areas or on the connecting roads between them with Station Management approval.

• Position staffed In accordance with technical specifications.

• • Position staffed in accordance with technical specifications and station procedures.

• • May be provided by shift personnel assigned other functions.

.. .(EMP) Emergency Medical Personnel:

individuals qualified as EMPs, RNs, First Responders, and Paramedics.

NOTES: Response times are based on optimum travel conditions.

On Shift Position

1. 7 is Assistant to Offsite Communicator and can be replaced by an SRO that is qualified for the task.On Shift Position

1. 11 can be filled by an RO or SRO that is gualified for the taskOn Shift Positions

1. 13 and #14 are available to support Shift Manager, where qualified, in non-fire events.(1) Thls table B-i is incorporated Into the Emergency Plan In accordance with USNRC Generic Letter 82-33 dated 12/17/82 andIncorporates within 30 days of approval the conclusions of the PNPS On Shift Staffing Analysis Report which is a part of theEmergency Plan in accordance with 10CFR5O Appendix E,Section IV. A. 9 and maintained as a separate document.

B-7Revision 44 ATTACHMENT 3To Entergy Letter No. 2.16.001Chemistry Technician Training2006 Submittal vs 2016 Submittal (3 Pages)

Attachment 3 to PNPS Letter 2.16.001Augmented Radiological Protection (RP) Training needed for the "On-Shift" Chemistry Technician to Support Initial ERO Duties (during first 30 minutes)NUREG0654 Chemistry Technician Training Chemistry Technician Training Justification for Reduced Training ITable B-I Identified in 2006 Submittal Identified in 2016 Comments"On-Shift" (See OSA Analysis notes below)TaskOn-site

• Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool *The 2012 OSA ensured that PNPSand In- Member Qualification Member Qualification ERO team members can accomplish Plant

• Respirator User Qualification

• Perform Radiation Surveys the required mission in the first 90Surveys

• Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus

• Perform Contamination Surveys minutes of ERO activation with theUser Qualification

• Operate Basic Dose Rate Meters current on-shift ERO staff defined in* Walkdown EOP-4 survey point * -Operate Basic Count Rate Meters Table B-I.locations

• Perform Radiation Surveys* Perform Contamination Surveys* Collect an Airborne Radioactivity Sample* Analyze Smears for contamination levels* Analyze Air Samples* Operate Basic Dose Rate Meters* Operate Basic Count Rate Meters* Operate the Scintillation AlphaCounter* Operate the Beta Counter* Operate the Gamma Spec System* Operate the Regulated Air SamplePump* Operate the Radeco Air Sampler1 Attachment 3 to PNPS Letter 2.16.001Augmented Radiological Protection (RP) Training needed for the "On-Shift" Chemistry Technician to Support Initial ERO Duties (during first 30 minutes)NUREG0654 Chemistry Technician Training Chemistry Technician Training Justification for Reduced Training

/Table B-I Identified in 2006 Submittal Identified in 2016 Comments"On-Shift" (See OSA Analysis notes below)TaskAccess *Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool *The 2012 OSA ensured that PNPSControl Member Qualification Member Qualification ERO team members can accomplish

• Control High Radiation Areas the required mission in the first 90* RWP Briefing minutes of ERO activation with the* Perform Stay Time Calculations current on-shift ERO staff defined in* Issue and Return Respirators Table B-i.RP .Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool *The 2012 OSA ensured that PNPSCoverage Member Qualification Member Qualification ERO team members can accomplish for repair,

• Respirator User Qualification

• Perform Radiation Surveys the required mission in the first 90corrective

• SCBA User Qualification

• Perform Contamination Surveys minutes of ERO activation with theactions,

• RP Job Coverage

• Operate Basic Dose Rate Meters current on-shift ERO staff defined insearch and

• Control High Radiation Areas

• Operate Basic Count Rate Meters Table B-I.rescue first

• RWP Briefingaid & Perform Stay Time Calculations firefighting

• Perform Radiation Surveys* Perform Contamination Surveys* Collect an Airborne Sample* Analyze Smears* Analyze Air Samples* Operate Basic Dose Rate Meters* Operate Basic Count Rate Meters* Operate the SAC-4* Operate the BC-4* Operate the Gamma Spec System* Operate the RAS Pump* Operate the Radeco* Perform RP Duties in Response to aPlant Fire___________________

2 Attachment 3 to PNPS Letter 2.16.001Augmented RadiologQical Protection (RP) Training needed for the "On-Shift" Chemistry Technician to SupDport Initial ERO Duties (during first 30 minutes)NUREG0654 Chemistry Technician Training Chemistry Technician Training Justification for Reduced Training

/Table B-I Identified in 2006 Submittal Identified in 2016 Comments"On-Shift" (See OSA Analysis notes below)TaskPersonnel

• Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool

• The 2012 OSA ensured that PNPSMonitoring Member Qualification Member Qualification ERO team members can accomplish

• RP Job Coverage the required mission in the first 90* RWP Briefing minutes of ERO activation with the* Perform Personnel Decontamination current on-shift ERO staff defined inTable B-I.Dosimetry

• Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool

• No effective change is identified Member Qualification Member Qualification

• Issue and Control Personnel

• Issue Dosimetry Dosimetry OSA Notes:1. The 2012 OSA satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Section IV.A.9. A structured approach was utilized to perform this analysis using the guidance found in NEI10-05, Rev. 0, Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities.

This analysis examined the capability of the minimum staff listed in TableB-i of the PNPS Emergency Plan (E-Plan) to perform the actions for the key functional areas of events described in NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, until augmenting Emergency Response Organization (ERO) staff arrives in accordance with the E-plan.2. The OSA review team determined that an on-shift staff of fourteen (14) is required to respond to the most limiting accident scenario

reviewed, main control room fire andshutdown at the remote shutdown panel.3. NEI 10-05 staffing analysis of on-shift personnel to perform the required emergency planning functions and the licensing basis requirement for each on-shift position.

NEI 10-05recommends one (1) on-shift RP Technician and one (1) on-shift Chemistry Technician.

The PNPS SEP is consistent with the NEI guidance.

4. The primary responsibility for the Chemistry Technician is chemistry/radiochemistry sampling; however no chemistry job tasks were noted as being time critical or requiredduring the first 90 minutes of any of the analyzed events.5. The 2012 OSA analysis included a review of the implementation of the requirement to maintain continuous communications with the notification source during an aircraft threatin accordance with 10CFR50.54(hh) and Reg. Guide 1.214. There are no specific qualifications required to perform this task and the function is not required to be assigned inadvance.

The review of the Aircraft Threat Accident identified that there are sufficient personnel on-shift to perform this action during the event, Specifically, a licensed or non-licensed nuclear plant operator, the rad protection technician, and chemistry technician were all available to fill this function.

6. Augmentation time for some ERO positions is 30 minutes.

The OSA analysis was completed for the 90 minute period since the emergency response facilities are required to beoperational in 60 minutes.

No credit was taken for current 30 minute responders.

Tasks for event response were reviewed for 90 minutes following the declaration.

No specificemergency response tasks requiring the augmented ERO were identified during the 90 minutes following the emergency declaration.

7. The 2012 OSA assumed individuals holding the position of RP technician or Chemistry technician are qualified to perform the range of tasks expected of their position.

ATTACHMENT 4To Entergy Letter No. 2.16.001PNPS Emergency Response Organization On-Shift Staffing Analysis(74 Pages)

PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTENTERGYPILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION10CFR5O APPENDIX EON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSISFINAL REPORTDecember 20, 2012Prepared by:Myra JonesFred Guynn PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTTABLE OF CONTENTSI. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................

4II. ANALYSIS SUMMARY .............................................................................

4A. Emergency Plan Minimum Staffing....................................................................

5B. Other Commitments to Shift Staffing...........................................................

....... 6C. Staffing Exceptions and Time Motion Studies (TMS) ..............................................

6D. Emergency Plan Tasks Not Analyzed

................................................................

7III. ANALYSIS PROCESS ..............................................................................

8IV. ACCIDENT SCENARIOS

...... .....................................................................

9A. Accident Selection........................................................................................

9B. Accident Scenarios included in the Analysis

,......................................................

..9C. Accident Scenarios Not Included in the Analysis

..................................................

10V. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS................................................

11A. Notes and Assumptions Applicable to Pilgrim OSA: ..............................................

11B. NEI 10-05 Assumptions

..................

.........

...................................................

11VI. APPENDIX A -ANALYZED EVENTS AND ACCIDENTS

.....................................

14Vii APPENDIX B -ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS.............................................

16A. Accident Analysis

1. 1 -Design Basis Threat (DBT)...............................................

16B. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 2 -Control Rod Drop Accident..............................

21C. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 4 -Loss of Coolant Accident................................

27D. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 5 -Main Steam Line Break ..................................

33E. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 6 -Fuel Handling Accident

..................................

39F. Accident Analysis

1. 8 -Aircraft Probable Threat ..................................................

45G. Accident Analysis

1. 9 -Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown..................

51H. Accident Analysis

1. 10 -Station Blackout...........................................................

57I. Accident Analysis

1. 11 -LOCA/General Emergency with Release and PAR ................

63VIIIAPPENDIX C TIME MOTIONS STUDIES.......................................................

69A. TMS Shift Manager Safe Shutdown Task...........................................................

69PNPS Page 2 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTIX. OVERLAP OF TASKS ACTIVITIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS IDENTIFIED

...............

73A. Overlap Requiring Compensatory Measures

.....................................................

73X. REFERENCES

...................................................................................

74XI. STAFFING ANALYIS TEAM ....................................................................

74PNPS Page 3PNPSPage 3 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTI. INTRODUCTION This report is the finai report for the On-shift Staffing Analysis (OSA) that commenced at PilgrimNuclear Power Station (PNPS) during the week of March 19 -22, 2012. This OSA satisfies therequirement of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Section IV.A.9, which states that nuclear power licensees shall perform "a detailed analysis demonstrating that on-shift personnel assigned emergency planimplementation functions are not assigned responsibilities that would prevent the timelyperformance of their assigned functions as specified in the emergency plan. "A structured approach was utilized to perform this analysis using the guidance found in NEI 10-05, Rev. 0,Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities.

Thisanalysis examined the capability of the minimum staff listed in Table B-I of the PNPS Emergency Plan (E-Plan) to perform the actions for the key functional areas of events described inNSIRIDPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, untilaugmenting Emergency Response Organization (ERO) staff arrives in accordance with the E-plan.I. ANALYSIS SUMMARYThe OSA team determined that an on-shift staff of fourteen (14) is required to respond to themost limiting accident scenario

reviewed, main control room fire and shutdown at the remoteshutdown panel. The on-shift staff consists of individuals necessary to support each of the E-Planfunctional areas or tasks:* Emergency Direction and Control* Plant Operations and Safe Shutdown (SSD)* Fire Fighting (FB)* Accident Assessment

• Radiation Protection and Chemistry

• Notification/Comnmunication

• Technical Support* Accountability NEI 10-05 states it is acceptable for certain functions or tasks to be assigned to personnel already assigned other primary functions/tasks.

These include Repair and Corrective Action,Rescue Operations and First Aid.PNPS Page 4PNPSPage 4 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTA. Emergency Plan Minimum StaffingPer 10 CFR 50.54 (q)(1)(iii),

Emergency planning function means a capability or resourcenecessary to prepare for and respond to a radiological emergency, as set forth in theelements of section IV of Appendix E and, for nuclear power reactor licensees, theplanning standards of § 50.47(b).

The following table indicates the result of the NEI 10-05 staffing analysis of on-shift-personnel to perform the required emergency planning functions and the licensing basisrequirement for each on-shift position.

Licensing Basis On-ShiftPosition4 Requirement E-Plan Functional Area StaffingAnalysisResults50.54m Emergency Direction andShift Manager (SM) E-plan Table B-I ControlSSD (TMS for SSD1actions)Control Room Supervisor 50.54m(CRS) E-plan Table B-I1SShift Control Room E-plan Table B-I1ehia uprEngineer (STA)Licensed Nuclear Plant 50.54m SSD -Operator (RO #1 ) E-plan Table B-iLicensed Nuclear Plant 50.54m SSD1Operator (RO #2) E-plan Table B-iNon-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i SSD2Plant Operator (NLO #1")1Non-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i E-Plan Communicator Plant Operator (NLO #2)______

Notifications 31Non-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i1BPlant Operator (NLO #3)Non-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i1BPlant Operator (NLO #4)Non-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i1BPlantOperator_(NLO_#5)

_________

Chemist E-plan Table B-1 Accident1 Assessment/Chemistry1 RP #1 E-plan Table B-i Radiation Protection 1Fire Brigade #11 E-plan Table B-i FB 1Fire Brigade #21 E-plan Table B-i FB 1E-plan Table B-i Per SecuritySecurity Security Accountability Contingency

_____________

Contingency Plan _____________

PlanTOTAL 141Fire Brigade #1 and Fire Brigade #2 positions did not have any actions or tasks identified in thisOSA other than Fire Brigade.

These on-shift members (e.g., NLO, Security) are available tosupport the Shift Manager, where qualified, in non-fire events.2SSD NLO can be filled by RO or SRO.3E-Plan Communicator can be replaced by SRO that is qualified for the task.4One of the 5 NLOs is a Radwaste OperatorPNPSPage 5 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTI-7B. Other Commitments to Shift StaffingNoneC. Staffing Exceptions and Time Motion Studies (TMS)1. The primary responsibility for the Chemistry Technician ischemistry/radiochemistry sampling; however no chemistry job tasks were notedas being time critical or required during the first 90 minutes of any of theanalyzed events. It is therefore acceptable to assign the Chemistry Technician the E-Plan function of dose assessment.

In addition, the RP Technician sharesthe responsibility for dose assessment.

It is recognized,

however, that the ShiftManager will prioritize and utilize the on-shift staff as needed for RP, Chemistry and dose assessment.

No further analysis or TMS is required.

2. The Shift Manager is assigned the responsibility to make some notifications perprocedure 1.3.12. The notifications by phone are considered communications that are approximately one minute in length and are acceptable tasks for the ShiftManager.

No further analysis or TMS is required.

3. The analysis included a review of the implementation of the requirement tomaintain continuous communications with the notification source during anaircraft threat in accordance with 10OCFR50.54(hh) and Reg. Guide 1.214. Thereare no specific qualifications required to perform this task and the function is notrequired to be assigned in advance.

The review of the Aircraft Threat Accidentidentified that there are sufficient personnel on-shift to perform this action duringthe event. Specifically, a licensed or non-licensed nuclear plant operator, the radprotection technician, and chemistry technician were all available to fill thisfunction.

No further analysis TMS is required.

4. A time motion study was completed for the Shift Manager action to perform thesafe shutdown actions to initiate a scram and close the MSIVs by manipulating RPS breakers and pulling fuses. The Shift Manager leaves the control room andpasses the equipment on the way to the Technical Support Center. The ShiftManager demonstrated the safe shutdown actions can be completed inapproximately six (6) minutes while maintaining emergency direction and controlthrough radio contact with other operators aligning safe shutdown equipment.

Details of the TMS are found in section VIII Appendix C.PNPS Page 6PNPSPage 6 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTD. Emergency Plan Tasks Not Analyzed:' 1. Repair and Corrective Action -Per the guidance of NUREG-0654, Table B-I,repair and corrective action tasks may be performed by dedicated shift personnel or qualified shift personnel assigned other functions/tasks.

Repair and corrective action is defined as:*An action that can be performed promptly to restore a non-functional component to functional status (e.g., resetting a breaker),

or to place acomponent in a desired configuration (e.g., open a valve), and which doesnot require work planning or implementation of lockout/tagout controls tocomplete.

In accordance with NEI 10-05 section 2.5, the analysis included a review of therepair and corrective action tasks. For the purpose of this analysis, the taskswere considered to fall into two broad categories:

• Unplanned/unexpected actions that address equipment failures.

Theseactions are contingent in nature and cannot be specified in advance.* Planned/expected actions performed in support of operating procedure implementation, including severe accident management guidelines.

At PNPS, a Nuclear Plant Reactor Operator on shift will primarily be available tothe Shift Manager to perform actions to assist in controlling/mitigating the event.Initial corrective actions are contained in and controlled by plant operating procedures.

The Nuclear Plant Operators have been trained to perform specificactions within the Abnormal and Emergency Operating Procedures andmaintenance support is not required.

Maintenance is not included in the on-shiftstaff. Repair and Corrective Action is an acceptable collateral duty per theguidance of NEI 10-05 and was not analyzed2. Rescue Operations and First Aid: in accordance with NEI 10-05 section 2.6, theanalysis also included a review of rescue operations and first aid response.

Perthe guidance of NUREG-0654, Table B-i, rescue operations and first aid may beperformed by shift personnel assigned other functions/tasks.

The fire brigademembers (NLOs) are trained to perform rescue operations and are assigned thetask should the need arise. Additionally, select Security staff members aretrained to First Responder standards and meet the basic requirements to renderfirst aid and CPR. Should first aid be required during a hostile action securityevent, first aid actions will be performed after the security threat is neutralized and the site is secure. Rescue operations and first aid were not required in any ofthe accident scenarios reviewed.

Rescue operation and first aid are acceptable collateral duties per the guidance of NEI 10-05 and was not analyzed.

PNPS Page 7PNPSPage 7 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTIll. ANALYSIS PROCESSThis analysis was conducted by a joint team of corporate Emergency Preparedness (EP)personnel and station personnel from the Operations, Operations

Training, EP Training, Radiation Protection, Chemistry and Emergency Preparedness (EP) departments.

Additionally, personnel from Security provided input to the analysis when necessary.

The team members areidentified in Section Xl of this report.The emergency response to each event scenario was determined by conducting a tabletop of theevent using the emergency plan and procedures and the applicable department procedures suchas Operations emergency and abnormal operating procedures.

Each scenario was reviewed by the cross disciplinary team to determine what plant actions andemergency plan implementation actions were required based on plant procedures prior to staffaugmentation.

These actions were then compared to the minimum staffing for Emergency Planimplementation as described in the Emergency Plan Table B-I, ensuring that no actions wereassigned to staff members that conflicted with either their dedicated emergency plan role or theirdedicated operational role as appropriate.

In cases where multiple tasks were assigned to anindividual in their role, the team evaluated timing of the' tasks to ensure that they could beperformed by the individual in series within any specified time requirements.

The results of the analysis for each of the scenarios are included in Section VII, APPENDIX B -ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS.

Note that NSIR DPR-ISG-01 states that only DBA accidents "which would result in an emergency declaration" should be evaluated in the staffing assessment.

Each of PNPS DBA's were evaluated and classified according to its FSAR Chapter 14description.

If the accident description alone did not result in a classification, the projected accident EAB dose found in the ESAR was utilized to determine if an EAL threshold would beexceeded within the first 60 minutes using the Abnormal Rad Level EAL thresholds.

In caseswhere several projected dose rates were provided or release data was not detailed significantly todetermine an EAL, the assessment used the radiological consequences associated with therealistic case in accordance with NEI 10-05.PNPS Page 8PNPSPage 8 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTIV. ACCIDENT SCENARIOS A. Accident Selection

1. The OSA scenarios were chosen using the guidance of NE1 10-05 andNSIR/DPR-ISG-01, "interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for NuclearPower Plants."

The evaluation considered the station Design Basis Accidents (DBA) described in the FSAR along with additional scenarios specified by theguidance documents.

The scenarios considered were:* Design Basis Threat (DBT) ground assault* DBA Control Rod Drop Accident* DBA Loading Error Accident* DBA Loss of Coolant Accident* DBA Main Steam Line Break Accident* DBA Fuel Handling Accident* DBA Radwaste System Accident* Aircraft Probable Threat* Fire Requiring Evacuation of the Control Room and Plant ShutdownFrom Alternate

Location,

• Station Blackout, (SBO)* LOCA/General Emergency with release and PARa LOCA with entry into Severe Accident Management

• Fire Resulting in Reactor Trip (Appendix R fire)B. Accident Scenarios included in the Analysis1. Design Basis Threat as described in NE! 10-05* Land and/or waterborne Hostile Action directed against the Protected Area by a Hostile Force. This event assumes the threat is neutralized immediately when inside the protected area fence, no significant damageto equipment or systems that require corrective actions before the EROis staffed, no radiological

release, and no fire that requires firefighting response before the ERO is staffed2. Control Rod Drop Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.1* One control rod drops and reactor trips on APRM 120% flux scram.Credit is not taken for MSIV closure.

Release pathway is throughcondenser, turbine building then to environment.

EAL is based oncondenser release information in FSAR.3. Loss of Coolant Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.3* Double ended guillotine break of a recirculation line. All ECCS operate-as designed.

EAL is based on fission product barrier EALs.4. Main Steam Line Break Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.4* Break of one main steam line and followed by MSIV closure.

Release isto the atmosphere through the top of the turbine building (puff release).

PNPSPage 9 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTReactor coolant activity at TS limit. No EAL On the accident but on theUSAR EAB 2-hr dose.5. Fuel Handling Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.5* The accident involves a dropped fuel bundle on top of the core. InitialEAL is based on the event.6. Aircraft Probable Threat (50.54hh)

• Notification is received from the NRC that a probable aircraft threat exists(>5 minutes,

<30 minutes)7. Control Room Fire and Alternate Shutdown* A fire occurs in the main control room requiring the evacuation and theprocedure implemented to perform shutdown from the alternate shutdown panels.8. Station Blackout* A loss of all offsite AC power occurs and the failure of the emergency diesel generators.

9. General Emergency with release and "PAR* Assume GE condition with dose projection indication of a release greaterthan the protective action guideline (PAG).C. Accident Scenarios Not Included in the Analysis1. Loading Error Accident as described in ESAR 14.1.5.2* Misloaded bundle in the core. No EAL condition is met.2. Radwaste System Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.6* No EAL condition is met.3. Implement SAMG* A review of the SAMGs associated with the initial site-specific Candidate High Level Actions concluded that no actions would require on-shiftpersonnel other than licensed and non-licensed operators.

No analysisrequired.

4. Appendix R Fire* Fire leading to reactor trip with complications.

The control room fire andalternate shutdown requires more resources and actions outside thecontrol room than this fire. The team concluded the control room firebounds the fire analysis.

No additional analysis required.

PNPS Page 10PNPSPage 10 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTV. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS A. Notes and Assumptions Applicable to Pilgrim OSA:1. The RP and Chemistry tasks reviewed were those directed by the Shift Managerto support actions in Abnormal Operating Procedures (AOP), Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP), and Emergency Implementing Procedures (EIP).Any additional tasks directed by the Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support Center (OSC), or Emergency Operations Facility (EOF') procedures werenot reviewed.

2. The augmentation time for some ERO positions is 30 minutes.

The analysis wascompleted for the 90 minute period since the emergency response facilities arerequired to be operational in 60 minutes.

No credit was taken for 30 minuteresponders.

Tasks for event response were reviewed for 90 minutes following thedeclaration.

No specific emergency response tasks requiring the augmented ERO were identified during the 90 minutes following the emergency declaration.

3. The OSA team determined there are no time critical RP and Chemistry tasks andthat task performance is directed and prioritized by the Shift Manager.

The timeRP or Chemistry is directed to perform a task and the amount of time taken tocomplete tasks are estimated.

No Chemistry samples are required by TechSpecs within the 90 minute period after a declaration.

Since the Shift Managerdirects when the tasks are performed, there are no overlapping RP or chemistry tasks.4. All crews have one individual filling the SM and one individual filling the STAroles therefore the analysis did not consider using a dual-role individual.

B. NEI 10-05 Assumptions

1. Response time used for this analysis was the maximum acceptable number ofminutes elapsed between emergency declaration and the augmented EROposition holder at a location necessary to relieve an on-shift position of theemergency response task. (60 mmn.)2. On-shift personnel complement was limited to the minimum required number andcomposition as described in the site emergency plan. If the plan commitments allow for different minimum staffing levels (e.g., a variance between a normaldayshift and a backshift),

use the staffing with the smallest total number ofpersonnel.

3. Although the temporary absence of a position may be allowed by Tech Specs,the analysis was performed assuming that all required on-shift positions arefilled.4. Event occurred during off-normal work hours where ERO was offsite and allrequired minimum on-shift positions were filled.5. On-shift personnel reported to their assigned response locations withintimeframes sufficient to allow for performance of assigned actions.PNPSPage 11 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT6. On-shift staff has necessary Radiation Worker qualification to obtain normaldosimetry and enter the RCA (but not locked high or very high radiation areas)without the aid of a RP technician.

7. Personnel assigned plant operations and safe shutdown meets the requirements and guidance (analyzed through other programs such as operator training) andwas evaluated as part of this assessment unless a role/function/task fromanother major response area was assigned as collateral duty.8. In-plant (manual) safety related operator actions to manipulate components andequipment from locations outside the control room to achieve and maintain safeshutdown was done by a member of the on-shift staff as defined in the unit'sTech Specs.9. Fire brigade (FB) staff performance is analyzed through other station programs(e.g., fire drills) and was not evaluated as part of this assessment unless arole/function/task from another major response area was assigned as a collateral duty.10. Individuals holding the position of RP technician or Chemistry technician arequalified to perform the range of tasks expected of their position.

11. Security was not evaluated unless a role or function from another major responsearea was assigned as a collateral duty.12. Communications, briefings, and peer checks are acceptable collateral duties.13. All on-shift staff positions were evaluated, even if they had no known collateral duties, to ensure they can perform the tasks assigned to them. [Ref NSIRIDPR-ISG-01]14. The Staffing Analysis specified the resources available to perform "Repair andCorrective Actions" and "Rescue Operations and First Aid" but these may beassigned as collateral duty to a designated on-shift responder.

15. For assessment

purposes, NRC notifications were treated as a continuous actionper 10OCFR50.72(c)(3) and 73.71 (b)(1). This means once the initial NRCcommunications are established, the NRC will request an open line bemaintained with the NRC Operations Center.16. DBA (postulated

accident, Condition IV event, or limiting fault) is considered as"Unanticipated occurrences that are postulated for accident analysis purposesbut not expected to occur during the life of the plant. A postulated accident couldresult in sufficient damage to preclude resumption of plant operation.

As a result,a greater number and variety of actions would need to be implemented by plantpersonnel."

17. Unless otherwise specified in NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, or by the FSAR initial conditions of a DBA analysis, it was assumed that the unit was in Mode 1, Power.PNPSPage 12 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT18. DBT assumed a hostile force breached the protected area fence but wasneutralized with no adverse consequen~ces to plant safety. Damage inflicted onplant systems, structures and components was not sufficient to prevent safeshutdown or cause a radiological release.

There was no fire significant enough towarrant firefighting efforts prior to arrival of offsite resources and/or theaugmented ERO.19. The Staffing Analysis used DBA analysis assumptions, inputs, and timing ofevents as documented in the FSAR.20. In cases where a DBA analysis included a radiological

release, and the startingpoint of the release was not clearly defined, the staffing analysis assumed thatthe release began at the time of declaration of the initiating event.21. Severe Accident Management Guideline (SAMG) -It is sufficient to simplyassume that the accident progressed to conditions requiring a severe accidentresponse; it is not necessary to determine specific failures and the accidentsequence.

22. SAMG -The actions to be analyzed include those that implement the initial site-specific actions assuming the core is no ex-vessel (i.e., no reactor vessel failure),

and there is not actual or imminent challenge to containment integrity.

PNPS Page 13PNPSPage 13 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTVI. APPENDIX A -ANALYZED EVENTS AND ACCIDENTS E e t E e t S~ummary Descriptioniof~i Plant...

.... ...... '"== ..:I ....:* : Refe~rence = ......' "= '

iEn t ype- ::::::: :;:, Event.Mode..Document:s)

Event ECL.1 DBT Land and/or waterborne 1 NEI 10-05 Site Area YesHOSTILE ACTION Emergency directed against the ISG IV.CProtected Area by aHOSTILE FORCE.2 DBA Control Rod Drop Accident 1 FSAR 14.5.1 Site Area YesEmergency 3 DBA Loading Error Accident 1 FSAR 14.5.2 None Noz(misloaded bundle in the______core) 4 DBA Loss of Coolant Accident 1 FSAR 14.5.3 General Yes______Emergency 5 DBA Main Steam Line Break 1 FSAR 14.5.4 Site Area YesEmergency 6 DBA Fuel Handling Accident 5 FSAR 14.5.5 Site Area YesEmergency 7 DBA Radwaste System 1 FSAR 14.5.6 None Accident8 Assumed Aircraft Probable Threat 1 10CFR50.54hh Alert Yesfor (1)analysispurpose RG 1.2149 Assumed Control Room Evacuation 1 FSAR 14.6.1 Alert Yesfor and Alternate ShutdownAnalysis (fire in main control room) I0CFR50Purpose Appendix RFire HazardAnalysis10 Assumed Station Blackout 1 ISG IV.C Site Area Yesfor Emergency analysispurpose11 Assumed LOCA -General 1 ISG IV.C General Yesfor Emergency with Emergency Analysis radiological release and____Purpose PAR12 Assumed LOCA with entry into 1 ISG IV.C General for severe accident Emergency Analysis procedures.

Purpose ________________________

_____PNPS Page 14PNPSPage 1.4 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT13 Assumed Appendix R Fire I ISG IV.C AlertNoforAnalysis____ Purpose _____________

____ _______1Plant mode per FSAR or assumed for anaiysis purpose2No EAL met on plant condition or dose.3pNPS does not meet the NEI110-05 intent for the analysis of implementing SAMG. NEI 10-05 Section2.11 states that the analysis of the ability to implement SAMG focuses on the reasonably expected initialmitigation action that would be performed by on-shift personnel other than licensed and non-licensed operators.

The actions assessed by NEI 10-05 are those which implement the initial site-specific Candidate High Level Action assuming the core is not ex-vessel (i.e., no reactor vessel failure),

and thereis no actual or imminent challenge to containment integrity.

PNPS does include maintenance qualified toperform maintenance job tasks in minimum staffing and does not have contingency actions that must becompleted by maintenance in the severe accident procedures.

4Appendix R Fire is bound by the Control Room Fire and Alternate Shutdown.

Analysis is not required.

PNPS Page 15PNPSPage 15 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTVII. APPENDIX B] -ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSISA. Accident Analysis

1. 1 -Design Basis Threat (DBT)1. Accident Summary* Land and/or waterborne HOSTILE ACTION directed against theProtected Area by a HOSTILE FORCE. Assume adversary characteristics defined by the Design Basis Threat. Security Code Redcondition

2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* This event assumes the threat is neutralized immediately when insidethe protected area fence, no significant damage to equipment or systemsthat require corrective actions before the ERO is staffed, no radiological

release, and no fire that requires firefighting response before the ERO isstaffed.* Assume at power in Mode 1* Security notifies the Shift Manager of condition Security Code RED.* Assume all non-security staff is located inside the protected area at theirnormal work station when the event occurs.* Assume all systems function and the core remains covered.

No fueldamage and no release.3. Procedures Reviewed for Accident Response* Procedure 5.3.14, Security Incident* EP-IP-1 00, Classification and Notifications

• EP-IP-1 00.1, EAL* EP-IP-410, Evacuation and Assembly* Procedure 2.1.6, Reactor ScramPNPS Page 16PNPSPage 16 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesPNPS TABLE V-ON-SHIFT POSITIONT2/L1T5/L1T5/L31 Shift Manager Emergency Plan 60 T5/L5. No YesTable B-i T5/L6T5/L8T5/L10________________

_______________T5/L 14 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _2Control Room Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo Supervisor Table B-IShift Technical EegnyPa 2L3 Advisor/Shift Engineer ablrenc B-i n 60 T2/L3 No No(3rd SRO) Table_____B-1

___T5___L__

Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L oN4 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B-iN/ 24NoNLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa5 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B lai N/A T2/L5 No No*Non-Licensed 6 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A T2/L6 No NoO)perator (NLO #1) abe-Nlon-Licensed T5/L97 .cea lat Emergency Plan 60 T5/L1 1 No NoNuclea Plant able B-iOperator (NLO #2) _______ T5/L1 3 ____Non-Licensed 8 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed 9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #f4) al -Non-Licensed 10 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #5) al -ii Fire Brigade #1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No______________

Table B-I1________

_____12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No______________

Table B-I1________

_____13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 N/A No NoTechnician Table B-I1________

_____14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60 N/A No No_____ _____ ____ Table B-I1________

_____Security Contingenc) 15 Security Plan / E-Plan Table 60 T5/Li15 No No_____ _____ ____ B-i1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _PNPSPage 17 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNPS TABLE 2-~ PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN.

~ One Unit-One Control RoomAnalysis

1. 1 beT Security Thr~atMinimuin~Operat;ons Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and ~9~s orSAMGs if Applicable

Licensed Operator Training1 Shift Manager Shift Manager ProgramSuperisoricensed Operator Training2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Sprio ProgramLicensed Operator Training3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Program4Licensed Nuclear Plant ~Licensed Operator TrainingRatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Program5Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator TrainingRatrOeao#2Operator

1. 2 Program6 uiliry pertor#1Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator6___ Auxi___iary

___Operator_______Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 IOther needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_______________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A Nl/A13 I&C Technician N/A Nl/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A Nl/APNPS Page 18PNPSPage 18 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLinAFie PeromdbrakAayi ontetoProligramehd 1 N/A Fire Protection Program2 N/A Fire Protection Program3 N/A Fire Protection ProgramNote: This accident does not include the need for firefighting, first aid or search & rescue.1n-#ntSrvy DBTiThreati 2 n-it Srvy1 In-lan SurveyaeN/A25On-site SRveyN/A3 Ptersonnelseii Monitosring):

N/AN/A6 Othermistey spectific task #1 (describe)

N/__ A__Note: No chemistry or RP job function tasks for the conditions described in the DBT assumptions.

RP andChemistry take cover as directed.

I:.. PNSTAL~5-EMERGENCY

PLAN I:MPLEMENTATION

, :: .PNPSPage 19 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTDeclare the emergency classification level Shift Manager Emergency Planning Training1 ECL)Program

/ EP DrillsApprove Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning TrainingN/AcmenaiosProgram 3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Pmrogram Plnin rannEmergency Planning Training4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A ProgramLicensed Operator TrainingNotification and direction to on-shift staff SitMngr Porm/EegnyPann

( e.g., to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) SitMngr .raiigra P mrogram ,PnnnEmergency Planning Training6 ERO notification Shift Manager ProgramAbbreviated NRC notification for DBT SALicensed Operator Training7event TAProgram 8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Pmrogram Plnin rannEmrogenyPlninarann 9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Pmrogram Plnin rannProgram11 Ativae EDS NO#2Emergency Planning Training11 civae ERS NO#2Program N/A (per scenario Emergency Planning Training12 Offsite radiological assessment asmtos rgaEmemtns rogenyPlninarann 13 Perform NRC notifications NLO#2 Pmrogram Plnin rannPerform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, Shift Manager PrgaINPO, ANI, etc.) Program_________________

15 Iersnne Accuntbilty SecuityOffcer Security Training Program / EP15 Prsonel ccontablit Secrit Offcer DrillsPNPS Page 20PNPSPage 20 (PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTB. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 2 -Control Rod Drop Accident1. Accident Summary* The control rod drop accident (CRDA) results from an assumed failure ofthe control rod-to-drive mechanism coupling after the control rod (veryreactive rod) becomes stuck in its fully inserted position.

It is assumedthat the control rod drive is then fully withdrawn before the stuck rod fallsout of the core. The control rod velocity

limiter, an engineered safeguard, limits the control rod drop velocity.

The resultant radioactive materialrelease is maintained far below the guideline values of 10OCFR50.67.

• The worst case CRDA occurs during mechanical vacuum pumpoperation.

The mechanical vacuum pump trips and the radionuclides aretrapped in the condenser at atmospheric pressure to leak directly to theenvironment.

The condenser leakage scenario is bounding for PNPS.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* The FSAR assumes the MSIVs, MSL drains, and reactor water samplevalves remain open.* The OSA assumes a realistic case of an immediate release from thecondenser to the environment via the turbine building roof resulting in thecondenser leakage EAB dose.* The EAL is based on 1-hr (1/2) of the FSAR EAB dose.3. Procedures Reviewed for Accident Response* 2.4.40, Rapid Increase in main Steam Line or Offgas Activity* EIP-IP-1 00, Classification and Notification

• EIP-100.1, EALs* EIP-EP-410, Evacuation and Assembly* 2.1.6, Reactor Scram* EOP-5, Radiological Release Control* 6.1-220, Radiological Controls for Risk Evolutions

• ARP-C904LC Alarm Response Procedure

• 7.4.64, PRM Alarm Response* 7.3.11, Reactor and Hotwell Water Analysis Preparation PNPS Page 21PNPSPage 21 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesT5/L3T5/L5Emergency Plan 60 No5YesI Shift Manager Table B-I T5/L6 NoYeT5/L8T5/L 10______ ______ ___ __ ______ ______T5/L14

______2Control Room Emergency PlanN/T/LNoo Supervisor Table B-IShift Technical EegnyPa 2L oN3 Advisor/Shift EmrecPan6T2L NooEng]ineer (3rd SRO) Table B-I16Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa /4 Plant Operator (RO Emrec lnNAT2/L4 No NoI) ~~~~able B-I1______

Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa /5 Plant Operator (RO Emrec lnNAT2/L5 No No2)Table B-iNon-Licensed EegnyPa /6 Nuclear Plant Emrec lnNAT2/L6 No No'O p e ra to r (N L O # 1 ) T a b le B -I1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Nlon-Licensed Emrec lnT5/L97 Nluclear Plant Emrec ln60 T5/L11I No NoFable B-IOperator (NLO #2) _________T5/L13 Nlon-Licensed EegnyPa / / oN8 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / / oNOperator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed Emergency PlanN/NANoo 9 Nuclear Plant aeB-N/NA NooOperator (NLO #4) al -Non-Licensed IEmergency PlanN/Noo 10 Nuclear PlantN/NA NooOperator (NLO #5) beB- /11 Fire Brigade #1 Emergency PlanN/NANoo

_______ _______ able B-i1/ / oN12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No______________

Fable B-I1________

13 RP / Chemistry IEmergency Plan 60 T5/L12 No NoTechnician B-i1________

_____14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60 T4/L1 No No_____ _____ _____ able B-I1_ _ _ __ _ _ _Security Contingencyl 15 Security / E-Plan Table 60 T5/L1 5 No NoL PNP TABLE E2 -PLANT p OE RkTIQNS SH

° IPNPSPage 22 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT%

e nit ne Control R oom :,".....

..........

= = =::; 2Anlyis#1Control Robd DroD Accident iLine # Generic TitlelRole On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling MethodLicensed Operator Training1 Shift Manager Shift Manager ProgramSuperisorLicensed Operator Training2 U~nit Supervisor Control Room SuevsrProgram 3 Shft echicalAdvsorLicensed Operator Training3 Sif Tchica AviorShift Engineer/STA ProgramLicensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator Training4 Reactor Operator

1. 1Oprtr#Prga Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator Training5 Reactor Operator

1. 2Oprtr2Poga 6 uiliry pertor#1Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator6 uxliryOpraor#1Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 &uxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic TitlelRole On-Shift Position Task Analysis________________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 l&C Technician N/A N/A,14 O3ther N/A N/A15 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 23PNPSPage 23 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade:;: : ::::} :.: i , Analysis~#

2 Control Rod Drop

=, ;= i¢ J:1 N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A5 N/A N/ANote: The CRDA does not include the need for firefighting.

PNS ag 2PNPSPage 24 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPostio Prfomig Aalyis#2 onrolRo DrpAccid I In-Plant Survey:_RP#1X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X2 On-site Survey:_-

NI/A3 Personnel Mlonitoring:

N/A _T Job Coverage:

N/A5 Offsite Rad,ssessment:

(Included in Table ,56 Other site specificRP (describe):

N/A7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

N/A8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

N/A*Performance Times are estimated Notes: The following RP and Chemistry tasks are performed as prioritized by the Shift Manager and arenot time critical for the first 120 minutes.* Post scram in plant surveys (6.1.-220 Att 1.0) directed by the CRS (2.1.6) RB in area of scramheaders and tanks. =3 hours to complete*Onsite surveys after enter EOP-5* As directed by SM from checklist (EP-IP-100),

RP techs assume the responsibility for onsiteradiological controls using RP coordinators procedure EP-IP-261 Att 9.6.* Chemistry secure oxygen injection to condensate pumps as directed by the CRS (2.1.6)* Rx coolant sample (7.4.64, 7.3.11) directed in 2.1.6'as one of the methods to confirm radincrease,

however, ARP-C904LC directs operators to close the sample valves because ofradiation indication (MSL hi-hi rad). Coolant sample cannot be obtained until conditions allowopening the sample valves. T.S coolant sample is not required until 2-6 hours after shutdown.

Takes =30 minutes to complete.

• Procedure2.1.6 directs Offgas sample (not time critical) but it isolates.

Sample not requiredduring the 60 minutes.PNPS Page 25PNPSPage 25 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT~.NSTBE5EMRECPLNIMPLEMENTATIOQN

-:: -i: 'Declre he mergncyclasifiatin lvelEmergency PlanningDelr1h megnycasfiainivlShift Manager ' raining Program / EP(ECL) Drills2 pprove Offsite Protective Action N/ .Emergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Eraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A Eraining ProgamnnLicensed OperatorINotification and direction to on-shift staff Training Program /5 Shift Manager EegnyPann (e.g., to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) TingmrenYoralang Emergency Planning6 ERO notification Shift ManagerrangPorm Licensed Operator7 ,bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/ArangPorm Emergency Planning8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Tann rgaEmrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLricnsed OPeraogra 10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift Manager raiicnge POgeramo11 EnS Planning11 ctvateERDS LO#Training Program12 Offsite radiological assessment Chemistry Tcnia Eeraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NILO#2 Eraining ProgamnnPerform other site-specific event Licensed Operator14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, Shift Manager Training ProgramINPO, ANI, etc.) __________

15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 26PNPSPage 26 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTC. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 4 -Loss of Coolant Accident1. Accident Summary* This event involves the postulation of a spectrum of piping breaks insidecontainment varying in size, type, and location.

Break of a large .recirculation pipe represents the limiting pipe break inside thecontainment.

Reactor scram, MSIVs isolate, ECCS initiates and injects.* Radiological release to the atmosphere was assumed to occur viadrywell leakage, MSIV leakage, and ECCS leakage.

DW and ECCS flowthrough SGTS and released to the environment through the main stack.MSIV leakage is ground level, unfiltered release through the condenser and high pressure turbine.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* No operator action for the first 10 minutes when they initiate one RHR inContainment Cooling.* EAL is based on FSAR EAB dose.3. Procedures for Accident Response* EP-IP-1 00, Emergency Classification and Notification

• EP-IP-100.1.

Emergency Action Levels* EP-IP-300, Offsite Radiological Dose Assessment

• EOP-01, RPV Control* EOP-3, Primary Containment Control* EOP-4, Secondary Containment Control* EOP-5, Radiological Release* 2.1.6, Reactor Scram* EP-IP-240, Emergency Security Organization Activation and Response* 6.3-064, EOP-4 Surveys* EP-I P-400, Protective Action Recommendation PNPS Page 27PNPSPage 27 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesT2/LIT5/L1T5/L3T5/L41 Shift Manager Emergency Plan Table 60 T5/L5 No YesB-i T51L6T5/L8T5/L10____ ____ ____ ___ ___ ____ ____ ___ ____ ___ T5/L14_ _ _ _ _ _2 ontrol Room Emergency Plan Table N/T2LNooSupervisor B-iShift Technical EmrecPlnTbe 6T2LNoo3 EmrecPlnTbe 6T2LNoo__ _Engineer (3rd SRO) B-iLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa al / 2L oNLiceanse Nueratr(R Emergency Plan Table N/A T2/L4 No NoNnLicensedNula 65 ula Plant Oeao R Emergency Plan Table N/A T2/L6 No NoOperatr (NL #1) -iNon-LicensedT5L 6 Nucler Plant Emergency Plan Table NAT2LNooOperator (NLO #2) ______ TL1 ______Non-Licensed Emrgnc/PanTal 8 Nuclear Plant B-ignc N/ATale 6 N5/A1 No NoOperator (NLO #3) T5/L13____

_____________

Non-Licensed 9 ula ln Emergency Plan Table N/A N/A No NoNuclar Pant B-iOperator (NLO #4) ______Non-Licensed EegnyPa al10 Nuclear Plant B-igny la abe N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #4)______

10 FireBiade

1. 1an Emergency Plan Table N/A N/A No No_____ _____ ____ B-i1_ _ _ _ _ _12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan Table N/A N/A No No13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan Table 60 T5/L12 No NoTechnician B-i1______

______14 RP Technician Emergency Plan Table 60 T4/L1 No NoB-i1______

T4/L2 __ ____ ______15 Security Security Contingency 60 T5/L1 5 No No______________Plan

/ E-Plan Table B-i1 ______ _______ ____________

PNPSPage 28 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLine # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis1 Shift Manager Shift Manager raiicnge POperamo______ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ __ TrainingProg~ram 3 Licensed OperatorShift TuehialAvisor Shiftro Engine uer/STA r Trainingl ProgramLicesed uclar Pant Licensed Operator4 SReato Operhiat dior #Shperto

1. 1inerSTraining Prog~ram5 eco prtr# Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#2Operator

1. 12 Training Program6 uxiciary Operator

1. 1 NnLicensed Nuclear Pl n on-Licensed OperatorPln Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 21/8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A X/9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A X/10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A /Other (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic TitlelRole On-Shift Position Task AnalysisControlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 I&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 29PNPSPage 29 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade5 N/A N/ANote: The LOCA does not include a fire.PNPS Page 30PNPSPage 30 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLRP#1(ositionPromen requirements)

& asdirected by SM _2 On-site Survey:X X X X X X X X3 Personnel Monitoring:

N/AT Job Coverage:

N/A__50Offsite RadAssessment:

(Included in Table56 Other site specificRP (describe):

N/A7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

N/A8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

.__N/A*Prorac Times are estimated PNPS Page 31PNPSPage 31 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTi ! Func ion. Task O rrS it i P A nalysis:................

Emergency Planning1 Declare the emergency classification level Shift Manager Training Program / EP(ECL) Drills2 pprove Offsite Protective Action SitMngrEmergency Planning2 Recommendations ShfTangrraining ProgramEmergency Planning3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift ManagerrangPorm Emrgencyg Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnNotiicaionand iretio to n-siftstaf (eg.,Licensed Operator Trainingto assembleio evacuaireten etc.) siftff(.

Shift Manager Program I Emergency

_____assemb

_____e,__evacuate,______et___.___Planning Training ProgramEmergency Planning6 ERO notification Shift Manager Training Program7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A Lcne prtrTann____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ rogramEmergency Planning8 Complete State/local notification form Shift ManagerrangPorm Emrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civat ERD raiingProgram 11 AciTechnicianO#2Emergency Planning12' Offsite radiological assessment Chemistry ehnca Emraining Progamnn13 Prfom NR noifiatios NO#2Emergency Planning13 Prfom NR noifiatios NO#2Training Program14Perform other site-specific event notifications SitMngrLicensed Operator Training(e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Program__________________

15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 32PNPSPage 32 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTD. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 5 -Main Steam Line Break1. Accident Summary* This event involves the postulation of a large steam line pipe breakoutside containment.

It is assumed that the largest steam lineinstantaneously and circumferentially breaks at a location downstream ofthe outermost isolation valve. The plant is designed to detectimmediately such an occurrence, initiate isolation of the broken line, andactuate the necessary protective features.

This postulated eventrepresents the envelope evaluation of steam line failures outsidecontainment.

2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* Emergency Classification is not required based on the break of the mainsteam line. This analysis EAL is based on the FSAR MSLB accident EABdose.3. Procedures for Accident Response* EP-IP-IO00, Emergency Classification and Notification

• EP-IP-1 00.1. Emergency Action Levels* EP-IP-300, Offsite Radiological Dose Assessment

• EOP-01, RPV Control* EOP-3, Primary Containment Control* EOP-5, Radiological Release* 2.1.6, Reactor Scram* EP-IP-300, Offsite Radiological Dose Assessment

• 6.3-064, EOP-4 SurveysPNPS Page 33PNPSPage 33 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. Tablesi

,,

= A P PE.N D IX B =:=:, i ::'On-shift Pos =itin E-Pan:= Reference..

=Augnmertation Role In Tlable Unana...................yzed............

T2/LIT5/L1T5/L31 SitMngr Emergency Plan 60 TISNo YesShf aae able B-I T5/L6T5/L8T5/L10T5/L 142 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No NoSupervisor Table B-iShift Technical 3 Advisor/Shift Emergency Plan 6 2L oN____Engineer,_(

3rd SRO) Table B-I 0T/L oNLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L4 Plant Operator (RO Tablgenc B-I/AT2L No No______ 1)Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L5 lant Operator (RO Emrec ln NAT/5No No____2) Table B-INon-Licensed 6 Nuclear Plant Emergenc Plan N/A T2/L6 No No____Operator (NLO #1)TalB-Non-Licensed T5/L97 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 6 5L oNOperator (NLO #2)al -T5/L1 3 _____Non-Licensed 8 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #3)TalB-Non-Licensed 9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A NIA No No____Operator (NLO #4) al -Non-Licensed 10 NcerPat Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No____Operator (NLO #5 al -11 Fire Brigade #1 Emergency Plan NIA N/A No No_____ _____________

Table B-i1______

______12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No_____ _____________

Table B-I1______

______13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 T5/L12 No No____echnician Table B-I14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60 T4/L1 No NoT____________able B-I T4/L2Security15 Security Contingency Plan 60 T5/L15 No No___________________

/ E-Plan Table B-i1 _____________

_____________

PNPS Page 34PNPSPage 34 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNPS TABLE 2- =PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN=

i : ;i;i Analysis

1. 5 MaIn SteamrLneBak(LB Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AQPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line =# Generic Titl~elRole

'!:: : = On-Shift i :i Tsk Anialysisl ,1 Shft anaer SiftMangerLicensed OperatorShiftManagerShiftManager raining Program2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator_______Training Program3 Licensed OperatorShift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Training Program4 RatrOeao#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Training Program5 RatrOeao#2Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#2Operator

1. 2 Training Program6 Auxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed OperatorPlant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 jOther needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line'# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_________________________

_______________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 l&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A Nl/APNPS Page 35PNPSPage 35 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade1 N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A5 N/A N/ANote: The MSLB analysis does not include a fire.PNPS Page 36PNPSPage 36 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT: ......... ,.,:,;Analysis

1. 5 M ain Steam : Line ,Break: M

.... ..........

...I Function

/ Task __ __ ___;____!

N 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85-E 010 15 20 25 30 35 4045 50 55 60 65 70 75 8085 901 In-Plant Survey:_RP#1 X X X X X X2 On-site Survey:X X X X X X X X XRP#13 Personnel Monitoring:

N/A_4 Job Coverage:

N/A.50Offsite RadAssessment:

Tabie 56 Other site specificRP (describe):

N/A7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

_N/A_8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

N/A___*Performance times are estimated Notes: RP Survey RX bldg. around scram valves (6.2-064) then performs onsite surveysChemistry secure oxygen injection as directed by SMPNPS Page 37PNPSPage 37 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNPS TABLEIF 5-TEMERGNCY PANAMLYSISREPORT I a;I~ plI QLine#iucto

.......OnShif PostionTask AnalysEmergency PlanningDeclare the emergency classification level Shift Manager Training Program / EP(ECL) Drills2 pprove Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Eraining ProgamnnI Emergency Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose IN/ArangPorm Licensed Operator TrainingNotification and direction to on-shift staff Shift Manager Program /Emergency

,(e.g., to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) Planning Training Program6 IEO ntifcaton SiftMangerEmergency Planning6 ER notficaionShif Mangerraining ProgramLicensed Operator Training7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event NI/APrgaEmrogenya lnnn8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Eeraining Progamnn9 P)erform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emergency Planning_____________________________

________________

Training Program" Licensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 EDS NO#2Emergency Planning11 ctvateERDS LO#Training ProgramTechncian Emergency Planning12 Offsite radiological assessment Chemistryi Tcnia Training Program13 Prfom NR noifiatios NO#2Emergency Planning13 Prfom NR noifiatios NO#Training Program14 Perform other site-specific event notifications Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training(e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) ___________Program 15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 38PNPSPage 38 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTE. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 6 -Fuel Handling Accident1. Accident Summary* The fuel handling accident is assumed to occur as a consequence of afailure of the fuel assembly lifting mechanism, resulting in the dropping ofa raised fuel assembly onto the core. The drop causes mechanical damage to the bundle being dropped.* The drywell and reactor building are open with ventilation running.

Allreleases to the environment are through the reactor building ventilation.

• The drop of a fuel bundle in containment over the reactor pressurevessel bounds a drop of a fuel bundle in the fuel building due to thegreater drop height.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* Onsite personnel will be in accordance with the refuel outage staffingplan that includes additional SROs, ROs, NLOs, RP Techs, andMaintenance.

3. Procedures for Accident Response* EOP-5, Radioactive Release Control* 5.4.3, Refueling Floor High Radiation PNPS Page 39PNPSPage 39 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesAPPENDX B! TABL I N-SHIFT POSITIONS; inel Au m naio... ... ....Ro....l in.. Unana..yzed TMSIIT2/L1T5/L1T5/L3Emergency Plan 60T5/L5 No YesI Shift Manager Table B-i16 T5/L6T51L8T5/L1 0____ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ T5/L 142 Control Room Supervisor Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No NoTable B-iShift Technical EegnyPa3 Advisor/Shift Engineer Table B-i2/ / / /___(3rd SRO)__ ______4Licensed Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A T21L4 No NoOperator (RO #1) Table B-i1_________

_____Licensed Nuclear Plant Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo Operator (RO #2) Table B-i1____

______ _____6Non-Licensed Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A T21L6 No NoPlant Operator (NLO #1) Table B-i______

__________

_____T5/L97Non-Licensed Nuclear Emergency Plan 60 T5/L11I No NoPlant Operator (NLO #2) 'able B-i T5/L1 3_____ ____8 Nlon-Licensed Nuclear iEmergency Plan N/A N/A No NoPlant Operator (NLO #3) Fable B-i1________

____ ___________

Non-Licensed Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoPl:)ant Operator (NLO #4) B-i1________

___________

10 Non-Licensed Nuclear IEmergency Plan N/A N/A No NoPlant Operator (NLO #5) rable B-i1________

____ ___________

11 Fire Brigade #1 Emergenc Plan N/A N/A No No12Fr rgd 2Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No__2 __ire _Brigade_#2_Table B-i1________

_ _ _ _ ______ _____13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 T5/L12 No NoTechnician Iable B-i_________

_____ ___ ____ _____14 RPTechnician Emergenfcy Plan 60 T4/L3 No Noable B-i1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Security15 Security Contingency Plan / 60 T5/L1 5 No No_________________E-Plan Table B-I_______

_____PNPS Page 40PNPSPage 40 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNS.A.E2-PLN OPERATION

& SAF SHU.TDOWN " .........

.. ...I J.. ........

.. ...................

........I LO neI ...UItI -l O n e.. n tro R o o m. ..... ....I ...... .... ...I [. .:::: ::,,:...

...

1. 8 -F elH nd ig.c id nLine # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position task Analysis_________________________________________

ontrolling MethodLicensed OperatorI Shift Manager Shift Manager Training Program2 Unt Speriso CotrolRoo SuervsorLicensed Operator___ nit Supervisor______ontrol__Roo__

Supervisor_____

Training Program3 Licensed OperatorShift Technical Advisor ]Shift Engineer/STA Training Program4 Ractr Oeraor 1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator4 RatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Training Program.5 Leco prtr# icensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#2Operator

1. 2 Training Program6 ,uxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator_____ _______________________Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 ,uxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other' needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis________________________

_______________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 l&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 41PNPSPage 41 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade:i:~~~~PNPS

,TABLE :3'-:FIREFIGHTING::I,

.:,I N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A-5 N/A N/ANote: FHA does not include a fire.PNPS Page 42PNPSPage 42 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTN ; 5 30-: 35 45- 50-" 55-' 60 :70 80- I In-Plant Survey:N/A___2 On-site Survey:N/A3 Personnel Monitoring:

RP#1X X X X XT Job Coverage:

N/A50Offsite RadAssessment:

(Included in Table6 IOther site specific RP(,describe):N/A

.7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

N/A8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

N/A _*Times are estimated Note: RP#1 assist in monitoring and decon Of building evacuees at the Green Line.Additional RP on shift for refueling/outage to assist with tasksPNPSPage 43

.PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTi =iio: PN=: PS TABLE EMERGENCY IM PLEM ENTATION~i:; iLieFuncto I Tsk*I On-Shift Positio 1 Declare the emergency classification level ShftMaagrraining ProgamnniEP (ECL) Drills2 ,pprove Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program3 &pprove content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning4 &pprove extension to allowable dose N/A Emraining ProgamnnLcneOprtrTrainingPrga Notification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g., ShitcanaerProra OpEergerrancy gt o assemble,

evacuate, etc.) SitMngrPlanigTra inin Pmrogramy EegnyPlanning Tann rga6 ERO notification Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training7 /bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/APrgaEmrogenya lnnn8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 raningProgram 11 Planning12 Offsite radiological assessment Chemistry Tcnia Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NLO#2 Emraining Progamnn14Perform other site-specific event notifications SitMngrLicensed Operator Training(e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) rga15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 44PNPSPage 44 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTF. Accident Analysis

1. 8 -Aircraft Probable Threat1. Accident Summary* The analysis includes all emergency response actions taken prior to anaircraft impact in accordance with RG 1.214 for an aircraft threat that isgreater than 5 minutes, but less than 30 minutes from the site, andconsiders the dispersal of the site fire brigade away from target areas forfirefighting.

• The analysis does not include a scenario or response actions takenduring or after a crash.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* The Shift Manager receives the call from the NRC of probable aircraftthreat.* All non-security on-shift personnel are inside the protected area fence attheir normal workstation.

3. Procedures for Accident Response* 5.3.1 4.1, Airborne ThreatPNP Pae 4PNPSPage 45 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. Tables i ,:-________Aayi

_________

,.

; : :: ::: A ugme:ntation Role :in Table # !

i TMS Required?

Line # On-shift Position E-Plan Reference

Time I

:Line #:I T :;:ask? ' :,, T2/L1T5/LIT5/L31Shift Manager Emergency Plan 60 T15No YesTable B-I T5/L6T5/L8._ T5/L1 0________________

T5/L14 _ _ _ _ _ _2 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No No__ _Supervisor Table B-i _______ _______ ______Shift Technical EegnyPa3 Advisor/Shift Emrec ln60 T2/L3 No No___Engineer (3rd SRO) TaleB-Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L4 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B-I/AT2L No NoLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L5 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B-i /AT2 No No#___ 2) _________

Non-Licensed EegnyPa oN6 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 2L oN___Operator (NLO #1) al -/ 2LNon-Licensed T5/L97 lant Emergency Plan60T/1Noo 7 Nucler Plant Table B-i10T/I oN___)perator (NLO #2) ________T5/L1 3 _____ _____Non-Licensed EegnyPa / 3L oN8 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 3L oN___Operator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa / 3L oN9 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 3L oN___Operator (NLO #4) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa10 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 3L oNOperator (NLO #5 al -/ 3L oN11Fr rgd 1 Emergency Plan N/A T3/L4 No No11 _FireBrigade#1 Table B-i1______

______12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A T3/L5 "No NoT________

able B-i _______ _ __ _ _ _13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 N/A No NoTechnician Table B-i1______

14 RPehiin Emergency Plan 60 T4/L6 No NoRP Technician able B-I1______

______Security Contingency 15 Security Plan / E-Plan Table 60 N/A No No____ _______________

EB-I__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _PNPS Page 46PNPSPage 46 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLine # Generic TitlelRole

'On-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ _________________________

________________Controlling Method1 Ishift Manager Ishift Manager Licensed Operator______ __________________________

________________Training Program2 Jnit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Lricnsed OPeraogra 3 hitTechnical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Licensed OperatorShiftTraining Program4 Ractr pertor#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator4 ecorOeatr#

perator #1 Training Program5 Reactor Operator

1. 2 Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator____uiiayOeao Operator

1. 2 Nuler raining Program6 uxliryOpraor#1Non-licensed Ncer Non-Licensed OperatorP~lant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis____ _ _ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A NI/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 I&C Technician N/A N,/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A Nl/APNPS Page 47PNPSPage 47 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigadei!

PN

, :ii!':ii:

B LEicr f:: :: 3 -..... rob beEFaIG HT........

.IN G: ....:i == : ,.' :=' :,;: :...:::::..

',: ' ..1 NLO #3 Fire Brigade Training2 NLO #4 Fire Brigade Training3 NLO #5 Fire Brigade Training4 FB #1 Fire Brigade Training5 FB #2 Fire Brigade TrainingNote: FB goes to hardened facility outside the reactor building after performing tasks directed by theCRS.PNPS Page 48PNPSPage 48 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLv PoitonPefomance Time Period After. Emergency Declarato (mnte)I In-Plant Survey:2 On-site Survey:3 Personnel Monitoring:

____T Job Coverage:

5 Offsite RadAssessment:

(Included inTable 56Other site specificRP#1 goes tooutside PATChemistry Function task #1(,describe) 8Chemistry Function task #2(describe)

Note: RP relocates to outside the protected area but stays on PNPS property and Chemistry evacuates the process building and takes cover in a secure area.PNPS Page 49PNPSPage 49 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT'I!"i;:~PN PS TABLE 5- E MERGENCY PLAN IMPLEM ENTATION!

i !,.: =.' :;Function.ITask*

Position:

! l i"Task

" " ....

Co tr lln M ethodEmergency PlanningDeclare the emergency classification level SitMngrriigPormIE (ECL)Drills 2 Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program] Emergency Planning3 &pprove content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program4 &prov exenson o alowale oseN/AEmergency Planning4 ppove xtesionto llowbledoseN/Araining ProgramLicensed Operator Training5 Notification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g., Shift Manager Program I Emergency to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) Planning Training Program6 ER notficaionShif MangerEmergency Planning6 ER notficaionShif Mangerraining ProgramLicensed Operator Training7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/APrgaEmergency Planning8 Complete State/local notification form Shift ManagerrangPorm Emrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Eraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civae EDS NO#2raiingProgram ChemistryteTechnician#2Emergency Planning12 Ofsie raiolgicl asessentraining ProgramEmergency Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NILO#2 Emraining ProgamnnPerform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator Training14 Shift ManagerPrga (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etC.) Program_____

____________

15 Personnel Accountability N/A Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 50PNPSPage 50 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTG. Accident Analysis

1. 9 -Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown1. Accident Summary* Fire in the Main Control occurs that requires control room evacuation.

• Station personnel evacuate the control room taking time only for thoseimmediate actions within the control room that can be accomplished inseconds.

Station personnel take all subsequent action required to bringthe reactor to a cold shutdown condition using controls and equipment located outside the control room.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* The ATC operator will perform the immediate actions of the procedure toinitiate a manual scram and verify all rods in before evacuating thecontrol room.* Subsequent actions are performed from outside the control room.3. N Procedures for Accident Response* 2.4.143, Shutdown From Outside the Main Control Room* EP-IP-1 00, Classification and .Notifications

• EP-IP-1 00.1, EALsPNPS Page 51PNPSPage 51 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesILine # On-shift Reference Elapsed Yim+e!.

1. i Task?,:;::

T2/LIT5/LlT5/L31 Shift Manager Emergency Plan 60T5/L5 N eTable B-I 6 T5/L6 N eT5/L8T5/LI10________________

~~~T5/L 14 __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _2Control Room Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo Supervisor Table B-i / 2L oNShift Technical EegnyPa3 Advisor/Shift EegnyPa___Tnier(r R) able B-i 60 T2/L3 No NoLicensed Nuclear4 Plant Operator (RO Emrec lnNAT/4No No#1 ) able B-iLicensed Nuclear5 Plant Operator (RO Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo Table B-1i/ 2L oNNon-Licensed 6 Nuclear Plant Emergency PlanN/T26Noo

___Operator (NLO #1) al -Non-Licensed T51L97 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan60T/iNoo Table B-i 0T/1 oNOperator (NLO #2) _______T5/L13______

Non-Licensed 8 Nuclear Plant Emergency PlanN/T3LNoo Operator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed 9 Nuclear Plant Emergency PlanN/T32Noo

___Operator (NLO #/4) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa10 Nuclear Plant NoegecNola

___Operator (NLO #5) al -/ 3L11 Fire Brigade #1 Emergency PlanNAT34Noo T_________

able B-i N__AT3/L4

_ No______

No_____12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A T3/L5 No No_____ _____ ___ Table B-I1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 6 / oNTechnician Table B-i 60______

N/A_____

No____No

_14 RP Technician Emergenc Plan 60 T4/L4 No NoSecurity15 Security Contingency Plan/I 60 N/A No No______________E-Plan Table B-1 _______ ______ ______ ______PNPSPage 52 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT*PNPS TABLE 2 _-: PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN

, i:: : :i illAnalysis

1. 9- CR,,Evacuation

&Alternate Minimu'm Operations Crew Necessary to Im plemnent AOPs :an~d EOs o=r =SAMGs !if Applicable

,= Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_________________________Controlling MethodLicensed Operator1 Shift Manager Shift Manager Training ProgramSuperisorLicensed Operator2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Sprio Training ProgramShift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Lricnsed OPeraogra 4 Ractr pertor#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator4 eco peao 1Operator

1. 1 Training Program5 Ractr pertor#2Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator5 eco peao 2Operator

1. 2 Training Program6 Auxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator_______________________Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role IOn-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ __________________________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 I&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 53PNPSPage 53 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade: .. ..i: :': : ::.... ...i : : : P : NPS TABLE .. .. ...C ~~3:- FIREFIGHTIT NG : at n it r te$ " ' : ::o. :., ::L .. ...ne ..... Per......

fo iirmed llllil by ' i Taski A ay is Co toln Method1 NLO#3 Fire Brigade Training2 NO4Fire Brigade Training5 FB2Fire Brigade TrainingPNPS Page 54PNPSPage 54 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT:: .....PNPS.TABLE 4- RADIATION PROTECTION ANDi CHEMISTRY/,,:,=

.. ,:=,=..... Analysis

1. 9 CR Evacuation

& Alternate E 0-5atigfas:i:

2.:: 10- :i 1'5- 20-.125. 35 '45- 50-~ 55 i65- 70-1"75-180- ______.___

"., 101::f5.20.'25;-30=:

35: '40 4:5: :50: 55 :601 6570 ,o:75'80 o/85,:90:

1 In-Plant Survey:2 On-site Survey:3 Personnel Monitoring:

___4 Job Coverage:

RP#lSupport X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XFB50Offsite RadAssessment:

(Included inTable 56 Other site specificRP (describe):

7 Chemistry Function task #1(describe) 8 Chemistry-Function task #2(describe)

PNPSPage 55 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT! ":PN PS 5- ERGEN CYi PLEAN I1M PLEM ENTATI O i,Declre he mergncyclasifiatin lvelEmergency PlanningDECLar)h mrec lasfcto ee Shift Manager Training Program i EP(ECL)Drills

,pprove Offsite Protective Action Emergency Planning2 Recommendations N/A Training Program3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A Emraining ProgamnnNotiicaionand iretio to n-siftstaf.(eg.,Licensed Operator TrainingNoiia5naddrcin oo-hf tf egShift Manager Program / Emergency to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) Planning Training ProgramEmergency Planning6 ERO notification Shift ManagerrangPorm Licensed Operator Training7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/APrga8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Emraining Progamnn9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emergency PlanningLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civae EDS NO#2raiingProgram 11 Ativae EDS NO#2Emergency Planning12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NLO#2 Emraining Progamnn14Perform other site-specific event notifications SitMngrLicensed Operator Training(e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) _______rogram____________

15 Personnel Accountability N/A Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 56PNPSPage 56 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTH. Accident Analysis

1. 10 -Station Blackout1. Accident Summary* At power, normal lineups and no additionai events* RCIC starts to restore level and SRVs lift in the relief mode to controlpressure2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* Assume the Shift Manager recognizes power cannot be restored within15 minutes after the loss before the 15 minute SBO EAL period hasexpired.3. Procedures for Accident Response* 5.3.31, Station Blackout* EP-IP-1 00, Classification and Notifications

• EP-IP-1 00.1, EALs* EP-IP-410, Evacuation and AssemblyPNPS Page 57PNPSPage 57 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. Tablesi

,: PN PS:; :)i E ON DS I :

i:; ':-___________

Anaysis#10 Staton BackoT2/L1___

T5/L5T5/L8T5/L31T5/L142 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No NoSupervisor Table B-I3AvsrShiftTehia Emergency Plan 60 T2/L3 No, NoEngineer (3rd SRO) Table B-IiLcensed Nuclear4 Plant Operator (RO Emergency Plan N/A T2/L4 No No-~Table B-iLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa5 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B-i n N/A T2/L5 No NoNon-Licensed EegnyPa /6 Nluclear Plant Emrec lnNAT2/L6 No NoOperator (NLO #1) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa60T5/L9 7 Nuclear Plant -EegnyPa60T5/LI I No NoTable B-IOperator (NLO #2) T5/L13_____

Non-Licensed EegnyPa / / oN8 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / / oNOperator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa / oN9 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / / oNOperator (NLO #4) al -/Non-Licensed 10 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #5) al -11Fr rgd 1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No12 Fire Brigade #2 ,Emergency PlanN/NANoo

_______ _____ Table B-I1/ / oN13RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 N/A No No13 Technician Fable B-I1________

____ _____14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60 N/A No No_____________

TableB-I1_____________

Security15 Security Contingency Plan / 60 T5/L15 No No______________E-Plan Table B-i1 ________

_____ ______ _____PNPSPage 58 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNPS TABLE 2 ~- PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAPE SHUTPOWNOne Unit -One Control RoomAnalysis

1. 10 -Station Blackout.

Mnim~um Oper#ations Cirew N e essary: to Imple6m ent: AO Ps .and EOPs or .SA Ms Iif

i;Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis________________Controlling Method1 Shft anaer SiftMangerLicensed OperatorI Shft Mnage Shit Maagerraining Program2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Licensed OperatorTraining ProgramLicensed Operator3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Training Program4 Ractr pertor#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator4 RatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Program,5 RatrOperator

1. 2 Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOperator

1. 2 Training Program6 Auxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator_____ _______________________Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ _______________

ontrolling Method1 1 Mechanic N/A N/A1 2 Electrician N/A N/A1 3 l&C Technician N/A N/A1 4 Other N/A N/A1 5 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 59PNPSPage 59 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade TABLE

L:f¸ilG 1 N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A5 N/A N/ANote: The Station Blackout Analysis does not include the need for firefighting.

PNPS Page 60PNPSPage 60 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTE -, :10 ,:15i i25 30: 35!: 40 4:5 150' :55; 75 80 :85': 90,-1 In-Plant Survey:N/A2 On-site Survey:N/A3 Personnel Monitoring:

_N/AT Job Coverage:

N/A__50Offsite RadAssessment:

._Included inTable 56 Other site specificRP (describe):

N/A7 Chemistry----------------------------

---

Function task #1(describe)

N/A___8 Chemistry Function task #2(describe)

N/A__Note: RP and Chemistry do not have an assigned task for SBO. Chemistry is available for doseassessment if a release occurs.PNPSPage 61 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTDeclre te emrgeny ca nsfialyisn

1. 10e EmStationBlackout Delr1h megnycasfiainlvl Shift Manager Training Program I EP(ECL) D:rills2 pprove Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmergencyg Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A Emraining ProgamnnLricnsed OPeraorgra innNotification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g., ShitcanaerProra

/OEergerrancy g5 to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) SitMngrPlanigTra inin Pmrogramy EegnyPlanning Tann rga6 ERO notification Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/APrgaEmrogenya lnnn8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civae EDS NO#2raiingProgram 11 EDS kLO#2Emergency Planning12 Offsite radiological assessment Nl/A Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NiLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnPerform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator Training(4re.g.,

Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) __hift ____Manager_____Program___

15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 62PNPSPage 62 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTAccident Analysis

1. 11 -LOCA/General Emergency with Release and PAR1. Accident Summary (Assumed for Staffing Analysis Purpose)* The unit is in a Site Area Emergency ASI when the Shift Manager isgiven a dose assessment update that projects

>1 Rem TEDE dose at thesite boundary.

2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* All actions for SAE are complete.

• No transients other than LOCA are considered.

• The ERO would be activated at an Alert or SAE. For Staffing Analysispurpose, the T=0 clock is used for the emergency plan actions toevaluate the capability to implement the GE classification, PAR andnotification functions before the ERO arrives.3. Procedures for Accident Response* EP-IP-1 00, Emergency Classification and Notification

• EP-IP-1 00.1, Emergency Action Levels* EP-IP-300, Offsite Radiological Dose Assessment

• EOP-05, Radiological Release* EOP-01, RPV Control* EOP-03, Primary Containment Control* EOP-04, Secondary Containment Control* EP-IP-400, PARPNPS Page 63PNPSPage 63 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. Tables::' : * !:

!I P EN I B !: : :: : APPENDIX

Role inTable #

TMS Req'uired?

T2/L1T5/L1T5/L2T5/L31 Shift Manager Emergency Plan 60 T5/L4 No NoFable B-i T5/L5T5/L8T5/LI10____ ____ ____ __ _ ____ ____ ___ ____ ____ ___ T5/L14 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _2 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No No____Supervisor Fable B-I1______

______Shift Technical EegnyPa oN3 Advisor/Shift EerecPan6T2LNoo

___Eng]ineer (3rd SRO) 'able B-i10T2LLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L4 Plant Operator (RO Emrec lnNAT/4No No_____ 1)able B-ILicensed Nuclear5 Plant Operator (RO Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo T__ )able B-I / 2L oNNon-Licensed EegnyPa / 2L oN6 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 2L oN___Operator (NLO #1) al -Non-Licensed

-mrec lnT5/L97 EmergencyPPlan 60 T5/L1 1 No NoNuclear Plantable B-i15L3 _______ _________Operator (NLO #2) TS/L13_________________

Non-Licensed 8 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No___Operator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed 9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No'O p e ra to r (N L O # 4 ) _ __ab le_ _ _ _ _ __B-1_ _ _Non-Licensed EegnyPa10 Nuclear Plant Emrec lnNANANo No___Operator (NLO #5) ___able_

_ __ _ __ __ _ ___-1_ __ _Emergency PlanN/NANoo 11 Fire Brigade #1 Nobl No" ~~~Emergency PlanNAN/Noo 12 Fire Brigade #2 Nobl No13RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 6T5L2No No13 rechnician Table B-i1______

______ ______14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60T4/L2Noo

___able____

B-1_____

________

T4/L6Noo15 Security Contingency Plan / 60 N/A No No______________E-Plan Table B-i1 _______PNPS Page 64PNPSPage 64 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT: ......

PNPS.- T.ABLE 2- IPL'ANT OPERATIONS SAFE SHUTDOWN:i ":: :*i : ,M.nim m .Opeation Crew. Ne.essar to....mpl........e.....

..A.. ..... a ....d EO " ...r ......fA plcal.. .. ....ILine # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ ________________________________________Controlling Method1 Shft anaer SiftMangerLicensed Operator1__ iftMange Shift_______________

Manager_______Training Program2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Lricnsed OPeraogra 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Lricnsed OPeraogra 4 RatrOeao#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Training Program5 Reactor Operator

1. 2 Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator______________________Operator

1. 2 Nuler raining Program6 &uxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Ncer Non-Licensed OperatorPlant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 &uxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ _______________Controlling Method11 IMechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 l&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 O:ther N/A N/APNPS Page 65PNPSPage 65 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade..........

'" ...... ... "..... "' ... PN , 3 -. F REFIGHTiNG.':::

1 N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A5 N/A N/ANote: The LOCA/GE with PAR Analysis does not include the need for firefighting.

PNPS Page 66PNPSPage 66 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNP TBLE4-RADIATION PROTECTION AND'CHEI'ASTRY,

':I In-Plant Survey:N/A___2 On-site Survey:RP#1 onsite & XX XX XX XX X__SB surveys3 'Personnel Monitoring:

N/AT Job Coverage:

_N/A5 Offsite RadSsessment:

Se._eTble 56 Other site specific RP(describe):

RP#1 Issue X X X X XKI7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

N/A8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

N/A*Times are estimated.

Note: RP tasks are as directed by the Shift Manager and are not time critical.

Chemistry does not have an assigned chemistry task for LOCA with PAR. Chemistry is available for dose assessment.

PNPS Page 67PNPSPage 67 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTL ine

On-Shift

ii'!:Task Analysis'

,Emergency Planning1 Declare the emergency classification level Shift Manager Training Program / EP(ECL) Drills2 ,pprove Ofisite Protective Action SitMngrEmergency Planning2 Recommendations ShfTangrraining ProgramEmergency Planning3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training ProgramEmergency Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose Shift ManagerrangPorm Licensed Operator Training5 Notification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g., Shift Manager Program / Emergency to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) Planning Training Program6 ER notfictionN/AEmergency Planning6 ER notfictionN/Araining Program7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A Lcne prtrTannProgramEmergency Planning8 Complete State/local notification form Shift ManagerrangPorm Emrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civae ERS NO#2 ainng rogramChemAcstrytTechnician#2Emergency Planning12 Ofsie raiolgicl asessentraining Program12 Ofsie rdiolgicl asessentCheistr Tehniian Emergency Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnPerform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator Training14 (,e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Shift Manager Program15 Personnel Accountability N/A Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 68PNPSPage 68 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTVIII, APPENDIX C TIME MOTIONS STUDIESA. TMS Shift Manager Safe Shutdown TaskPILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATIONTIME MOTION STUDY OF OVERLAPPING TASKSTASK 1: PERFORM THE ASSIGNED SAFE SHUTDOWN ACTIONSJOB: SHIFT MANAGERTASK 2: PERFORM EMERGENCY DIRECTION AND CONTROLJOB: SHIFT MANAGERPNPS Page 69PNPSPage 69 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPURPOSE:Perform a Time Motion Study to evaluate whether the performance of safe shutdown actionsassigned to the Shift Manager is an acceptable task overlap to the Shift Manager's primaryemergency plan function of emergency direction and control.NOTEThe Time Motion Study should be completed by simulation ofperforming the safe shutdown steps while the Shift Manager isdemonstrating the Emergency Director function.

LOCATION:

Control Room to TB 23' RPS MG room to 23' Cable Spreading Room to TSCREQUIRED TOOLS/EQUIPMENT:

A. Procedure 2.4.143, Shutdown from Outside Control RoomB. Stopwatch or watch to time actionsPNPS Page 70PNPSPage 70 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTAPPENDIX D (NEI 10-05)Function I Responsibility (Task) Analysis TemplateEvent: #9 Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown Site: PNPSPosition:

Shift Mana~qer Line #: 1Function jResponsibility (Task) Action Step ]Duration 1 .SafeShutdown1.1 Perform the procedure steps assigned the ShiftManager in procedure 2.4.143 Rev 48, Shutdownfrom Outside the ControlRoom.T=0SM leaves the CR and directs hisstaff to implement assignedshutdown tasks[step 16(a), (b)] SM arrives at 1 minutepower supply panel C511I (TB 23' (T=+I)RPS MG Room) and* Opens Reactor Protection System (RPS) logicChannel A, breaker A3* Opens RPS Channel B,breaker B3* Closes RPS Channel A,breaker A3* Closes RPS Channel B,breaker B3+2 -SM leaves 23' RPS MG 1 minuteRoom and obtains fuse pullers (T=+2)and safety equipment from the 23'Switchgear Room-SM leaves 23' Switchgear Room 1 minute________________________

(T=+3)[Step 16(d)] T+3 -SM arrives at23' Cable Spreading Room.Opens panels C941 and C942* Removes fuse 1 6A-F10OA* Removes fuse 16A-F11A* Removes fuse 1 6A-FI12A* Removes fuse 16A-F10B* Removes fuse 16A-F11B* Removes fuse 1 6A-F1 2BSM verbalizes all fuses removed,reactor scrammed and MSIV'sclosed[step 16(g)] SM arrives and gainsaccess to the TSC. SM confirmsstatus of HCU scram valveposition from field reports or EPIC.TASK : :,, :,1 minute(T=+4)PNPS Page 71PNPSPage 71 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTTOTAL TASK DURATION:

6 minutesFunction Responsibility (Task) Action Step Duration2.Emergency 2.1 Maintain emergency 1 The ShiftDirection and direction and control of the Oversight of the emergency ManagerControl event response.

response.

maintains radio2 contact with crewInitiate any emergency

actions, for updates andNOTE directions The TMS is for the overlap period.The total time considered for thistask should be concurrent withTask 1.....D..FEMERGENCY

.......

TASK DURATION 6 MiueRESULT:Explain why it is acceptable or not acceptable for the Shift Manager to perform the safe shutdowntasks:The procedure Subsequent Action step 13(a) states that the performance of the procedure is an Alertclassification and to activate the ERO per EP-IP-100 from the TSC. In step 13(e), the Shift Manager isassigned the tasks to initiate scram, EAL notifications, MSIV closure, and verify scram valve positions.

The Shift Manager passes the RPS panels to initiate the scram and close MSIVs when traveling to theTSC from the control room. The Shift Manager performs steps 16(a), 16(c), 16(d), and 16(g) which takeapproximately 6 minutes.

Verification of control rod position may be verified from the TSC using EPIC.The performance of the SSD steps does not delay the classification of the emergency and the ShiftManager is able to maintain emergency direction and control by communicating with the crew by radiowhile they are aligning the alternate shutdown panels. Therefore, performing the safe shutdown steps isan acceptable overlapping task.Task Performer Richard Probasco Shift Manager August 23, 2012Evaluators Stephen Reid Operations Training August 23, 2012Fred Guynn Fleet EP Project August 23, 2012S______________________

Manager ___________

SThomas Diorio Pilgrim I&C (EP) August 23, 2012PNPS Page 72PNPSPage 72 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTIX. OVERLAP OF TASKS ACTIVITIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS IDENTIFIED A. Overlap Requiring Compensatory Measures1. The Shift Engineer

/ STA has a collateral duty to fill out the notification messageforms and to make all notifications which may detract the STA from theperformance of his/her primary STA function.

It is acceptable for the STA tomake the abbreviated NRC notification in a Design Basis Threat but may notmaintain the open line with the NRC.2. The Shift Engineer has a collateral task to perform safe shutdown actions whichmay detract from the capability to perform the primary STA function.

3. The Shift Engineer has a collateral task to perform dose assessment which maydetract from the capability to perform the primary STA function.

PNPS Page 73PNPSPage 73 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTX. " REFERENCES

• NEI 10-05, Rev 0, Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffingand Capabilities

• NSIR DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for Nuclear PowerPlants* PNPS Emergency Plan, Rev 39XI. STAFFING ANALYIS TEAM* Fred Guynn, Entergy ECH Sr Project Manager, EP* Myra Jones, CMCG Contractor

• Tom White, PNPS Manager -EP* Mike McDonnell, PNPS AOM, Operations Support* Barbara Nadeau, PNPS Radiation Protection

• Kenneth Sejkora, PNPS Chemistry

• Ashley Ohrenberger, PNPS Ops Training* Karen Sullivan, PNPS EP Planner* Robert Emmitt, PNPS ERO TrainingPNPS Page 74PNPSPage 74 Entegyi Nuclear OPoer SationsIc

• 600 Rocky Hill RoadPyotMA 02360John A. Dent, Jr.Site Vice President January 14, 2016U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Docuriient Control DeskWashington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Proposed License Amendment Request to Modify Emergency ResponseOrganization (ERO) Training for the On-shift Chemistry Technician Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationDocket No. 50-293License No. DPR-35LETTER NUMBER: 2.16.001

Reference:

1. PNPS Letter to NRC,

Subject:

"Emergency Plan Changes to the MinimumStaffing Requirements for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO)", dated July 14, 2006 (2.06.062).

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) hereby proposesto amend Operating License No. DPR-35 for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS).The proposed license amendment reflects a change in the Emergency ResponseOrganization (ERO) as it relates to staff training requirements applicable to the on-shiftChemistry Technician identified in Table B-I of the Site Emergency Plan (SEP). Thischange was reviewed by Entergy and determined to b.e a reduction in effectiveness ofthe PNPS SEP. This change i~s submitted to the NRC Staff in accordance with 10 CER50.54(q).

The proposed change has been evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 (a)(1).using criteria specified in 10 CFR 50.92(c),

and Entergy has determined that thischange involves no significant hazards consideration.

The bases for this determination are included in Attachment 1, which provides a description of the proposed change, abackground discussion, a technical

analysis, a regulatory

analysis, and anenvironmental consideration review. Attachment 2 provides a copy of the current SEPTable B-I, "Minimum Staffing Requirements for the Emergency ResponseOrganization."

Attachment 3 provides a comparison of proposed training and trainingpreviously proposed in letter Reference

1. Attachment 4 provides the current PNPSEmergency Response On-shift Staffing Analysis (OSA).

Letter 2.16.001Page 2Entergy requests approval of the proposed amendment by January 14, 2017. Onceapproved, Entergy will implement this amendment days.If you have any questions regarding the subject matter, please contact Everett P.Perkins at (508) 830-8323.

This letter contains no new or revised regulatory commitments.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Executed on the /'4" day of (_/2,j z ~,2016.A. Dent, Jr.;ite Vice President Attachment 1: Analysis of Proposed License Amendment Attachment 2: PNPS Emergency Plan Table B-I, "Minimum Staffing Requirements forthe Emergency Response Organization."

Attachment 3: Chemistry Technician

Training, 2006 Submittal vs 2016 Submittal Attachment 4: PNPS Emergency Response Organization On-shift Staffing Analysiscc: Ms. Booma Venkataraman, Project ManagerDivision of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission one White Flint North O-8C2-A11555 Rockville PikeRockville, MD 20852Regional Administrator, Region 1U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2100 Renaissance Blvd, Suite 100King of Prussia, PA 19406-2713 NRC Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationJohn Priest, Director, Massachusetts Department of Public HealthRadiation Control ProgramCommonwealth of Massachusetts 529 Main Street, Suite 1 M2ACharlestown, MA 02129-1121 John Giarrusso, Jr.Planning and Preparedness Section ChiefMass Emergency Management Agency400 Worcester RoadFramingham, MA 01702 ATTACHMENT 1To Entergy Letter No. 2.16.001Analysis of Proposed License Amendment (10 Pages)

Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS1.0 DESCRIPTION 2.0 PROPOSED CHANGE3.0 BACKGROUND 4.0 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS5.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW5.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria 5.2 No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination 5.3 Environmental Consideration

6.0 REFERENCES

1 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT

1.0 DESCRIPTION

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, "Amendment of License or Construction Permit at Requestof Holder,"

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) requests Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff review and approval of a revision to the Pilgrim Nuclear PowerPlant (PNPS) Site Emergency Plan (SEP) to decrease the Emergency ResponseOrganization (ERO) staff training provided for the "on-site" Chemistry Technician.

Entergy has reviewed the proposed changes against the standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)and requirements in 10 CER 50, Appendix E, "Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities."

2.0 PROPOSED CHANGEEntergy is proposing to revise the Emergency Response Organization (ERO) stafftraining requirements identified for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician.

Attachment 3identifies the proposed staff training requirements and provides a comparison to thetraining requirements previously identified in our 2006 submittal to the NRC Staff, datedJuly 14, 2006 (Reference 6.1).Subsequent review of the Pilgrim On-shift Staffing Analysis (OSA) dated December2012 (Reference 6.3) and the job performance requirements for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician indicate that previously identified training tasks and task qualification functions listed in the 2006 ERO submittal are not necessary for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician to support the "on-shift" RP Technician function/position at the onset of anERO event._Proposed Trainingc ChancieWe are proposing that the scope of the Chemistry Technician job training that isneeded to support initial "on-shift" RP Technician functions be limited to thefollowing general RP support tasks:o Perform on-site radiation surveyso Perform on-site contamination surveyso Set up the Operations Support Center (RP Technician work area)o Issue dosimetry A list of plant specific training to support these functions is provided in Attachment

3.3.0 BACKGROUND

The specific standard for establishing a shift emergency organization to respond toemergency events appears in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) which states, in part, "On-shift facility2 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001licensee responsibilities for emergency response are unambiguously

defined, adequatestaffing to provide initial facility accident response in key functional areas is maintained at all times..."

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV, requires licensee emergency plans to contain,in part, the organization for coping with radiological emergencies and the activation ofthe emergency organization.

NUREG-0654 (Reference 6.2),Section II.B, "Onsite Emergency Organization,"

presentsguidance for meeting these requirements.

The guidance describes the onsiteemergency organization, including the staffing requirements found in Table B-I,"Minimum Staffing Requirements for NRC Licensees for Nuclear Power PlantEmergencies."

This table specifies a minimum of ten on-shift responders in four MajorFunctional Areas. It also specifies seven on-shift response tasks where the duties maybe performed by shift personnel who are assigned other tasks (i.e., there are nodedicated responders to perform these tasks). -The on-shift staff must be able to cope with a spectrum of events until augmenting EROpersonnel arrive in accordance with the site's emergency plan commitments.

Theaugmenting ERO responders assume many managerial, engineering, andadministrative duties from the on-shift personnel, allowing on-shift personnel to focusmore fully on plant operations.

NUREG-0654 guidance recommends that there be, inaddition to on-shift personnel, 30 and 60-minute responders.

On November 23, 2011, the NRC published a final rule in the Federal Registeramending certain' emergency preparedness (EP) requirements in its regulations thatgovern domestic licensing of production and utilization facilities (Reference 6.5). Thisfinal rule amended 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.A, "Organization,"

toaddress the assignment of tasks or responsibilities to on-shift ERO personnel that couldpotentially overburden them and prevent the timely performance of their emergency plan functions.

Specifically,Section IV.A.9 states that licensees shall perform "... adetailed analysis demonstrating that on-shift personnel assigned emergency planimplementation functions are not assigned responsibilities that would prevent the timelyperformance of their assigned functions as specified in the emergency plan."Coincident with the rule change in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.A.9, the NRCissued NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, "Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for NuclearPower Plants" (Reference 6.6). This Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) provides information relevant to performing the on-shift staffing analysis.

The ISG states that the NuclearEnergy Institute (NEI) developed the document NEI 10-05, "Assessment of On-ShiftEmergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities,"

to establish a standardmethodology for a licensee to perform the required staffing

analysis, and that the NRCreviewed NEI 10-05 and found it to be an acceptable methodology for this purpose.The ISG also indicates that the completed staffing analyses are required to be part ofthe emergency plan and the results documented and submitted to the NRC inaccordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q)(5).

3 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.0014.0 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS4.1 Pilgrim-Specific Background Information The Pilgrim SEP (Rev 0) was originally issued in 1983. The SEP Table B-I plantstaffing figure, indicated that one (1) "on-shift" RP Technician and one (1) "on-shift" 1Chemistry Technician would be available for ERO response to support in-plant surveysand radio chemistry tasks under the Radiological Accident Assessment functional area.The SEP Table B-I was updated in 1990 (rev 10) and indicated a staff change from one(1) to two (2) "on-shift" RP Technicians in the Accident Assessment Support functional area. The purpose of the revision was identified as an editorial table change to creditthe additional RP Technician that was listed in the Protective Action(s)

(in Plant)functional area of the table and "to better reflect the format" of NUREG 0654. This SEPrevision was submitted to the NRC (Reference 6.7).In a letter dated July 14, 2006 (Reference 6.1), Entergy proposed to the NRC Staff tosubstitute the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician for the second "on-shift" RP Technician tohandleERO responsibilities during the first thirty (30) minutes of an event. As part ofthat proposal, Entergy stated that PNPS would (1) provide additional training for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician(s);

and (2) remove the second "on-shift" RP Technician from the shift when appropriate training was provided for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technicians.

This prior SEP submittal supported the removal of one (1) of two (2) "on-shift" RP Technicians listed in SEP, Table B-I, "Minimum Staffing Requirements for theEmergency Response Organization."

This Table B-i change was consistent with ouroriginal 1983 SEP and the guidance contained in NUREG 0654/FEMA-REP-I.,

Rev. 1,dated November 1980 (Reference 6.2).In a letter dated February 5, 2007 (Reference 6.4), the NRC Staff responded to our July14, 2006 request.

The letter stated "The NRC staff has concluded that incorporation ofthe proposed changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the PNPS Emergency Planand the plan, as changed, continues to meet the standards of Section 50.47(b) and therequirements of Appendix E to Title 10 Part 50 of the Code of federal Regulations.

Thebasis for our conclusion is contained in the enclosed safety evaluation.

In light of theabove, no NRC approval is necessary."

On the top of Page 3, the NRC Staff's SErestates the conclusion that the incorporation of the proposed changes do not decreasethe effectiveness of the PNPS Emergency Plan and the plan, as changed, continues tomeet standards of Section 50.47(b) and the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50.At Pilgrim Station since 2007, an on-shift Chemistry Technician supplements the on-shift Radiation Protection (RP) Technician in fulfilling the RP duties of the ERO duringthe early phase of ERO activation.

Four (4) additional RP Technicians are currently required to report to the site within 30 minutes, with the addition of four (4) more RPTechnicians reporting to the site in 60 minutes.

These additional RP Technicians provide support roles in the ERO Accident Assessment functional area after the first 304 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001minutes.

In Reference 6.1, Entergy outlined to the NRC Staff the specific training to beprovided to the Chemistry Technicians to support their fulfillment of the RP role for theearly phase of ERG activation.

Recently, Entergy discovered we were not providing the in-depth training for the on-shiftChemistry Technicians as documented in our letter dated July 14, 2006. A condition report was written and immediate actions were taken to address the issue. Specifically, a second RP Technician was added to each shift to restore the staffing levels that weredefined prior to F'ebruary 5, 2007 Table B-I revision.

Subsequently, Entergy has determined we could provide a reduced scope of RPtraining for the on-shift Chemistry Technicians from that previously proposed in our2006 ERG submittal.

The reduction in training is supported by the 2012 SEP On-shiftStaffing An alysis (GSA) which is provided in Attachment 4 (Reference 6.3). The OSAevaluated the on-shift ERG staff positions and verified that assigned personnel cancomplete required ERG functions/tasks in a timely manner; The GSA does not rely onthe on-shift Chemistry Technician to perform the required ERG functions/tasks specifically assigned to the on-shift RP Technician.

Entergy is proposing to reduce the level of training provided to the "on-shift" Chemistry Technicians who may be relied on to perform an initial ERG RP Technician supportrole.*The scope of training proposed in 2006 is documented in Reference 6.1 andsummarized in Attachment 3.*The scope of training proposed in 2016 is identified in Attachment 3 and involvestraining in the following specific task areas.o Perform on-site radiation surveyso Perform on-site contamination surveyso Set up the Operations Support Center (RP Technician work area)o Issue dosimetry This revised training scope is consistent with the responsibilities and actions that wouldbe required of the on-shift Chemistry Technician during the first 30 minutes of an ERGevent consistent with the Gn-shift Staffing Analysis.

4.2 Analysis of Reduced ERG Training Requirements for the "On-shift" Chemistry Technician The GSA provides the basis for a proposed reduction in on-site Chemistry Technician Training.

Section 2.14 of NEI 10-05 states "Although developed to meet therequirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.A.9, the staffing assessment methodology may be used to evaluate proposed changes to on-shift staffing levels oraugmented ERG response times. For example, an analysis could be performed with adesired response time for the augmenting ERG (e.g., 90 minutes),

and the results thenused to support the basis for changing a staffing or augmentation time commitment."

5 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001The OSA indicates that the primary responsibility of the on-shift Chemistry Technician ischemistry/radiochemistry sampling; however no chemistry sampling tasks were notedas being time critical in the first 90 minutes of~any of the analyzed events. As such, theChemistry Technician is available to assist the RP Technician in performance ofdirected RP task work in the Operations Accident Assessment or Protective Actionfunctional areas as determined appropriate by the Shift Manager.The OSA has ensured that the PNPS ERO team members can accomplish the requiredmission in the first 90 minutes of ERO activation with the staffing and training of on-shiftstaff members proposed herein. The OSA assumed that the RP and Chemistry Technicians are qualified to perform the range of tasks expected of their position.

TheOSA does not credit additional RP training for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician inorder to ensure that the "on-shift" RP Technician can complete assigned emergency plan functions in a timely manner. As such, assignment of any additional RP training tothe "on-shift" Chemistry Technician is not necessary and is considered to be anenhancement to the overall ERO organization.

The OSA is included in this submittal as Attachment

4. Based on the OSA, theproposed reduction in "on-shift Chemistry Technician training is acceptable and doesnot adversely affect the effectiveness of the PNPS Emergency Plan or the ability ofassigned on-shift personnel to perform their assigned functions.

5.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW5.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria The regulatory standards, requirements and guidance involving ERO staffing andaugmentation are as follows:,

• 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2)

-On-shift facility licensee responsibilities for emergency response are unambiguously

defined, adequate staffing to provide initial facilityaccident response in key functional areas is maintained at all times, timelyaugmentation of response capabilities is available and the interfaces amongvarious onsite response activities and offsite support and response activities arespecified.

• 10 CFR 50, Appendix E,Section IV.A (in part) -The organization for coping withradiological emergencies shall be described, including definition of authorities, responsibilities, and duties of individuals assigned to the licensee's emergency organization and the means for notification of such individuals in the event of anemergency.

• NRC Regulatory Guide 1.101, "Emergency Response Planning andPreparedness for Nuclear Power Reactors,"

Revision 5, Section C, stated in part"The criteria and recommendations in this regulatory guide are methods that the6 Attachment 1Ito PNPS Letter 2.16.001NRC staff considers acceptable for complying with the requirements in AppendixE to 10 CFR Part 50 and the planning standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) that must be*met in onsite and offsite emergency response plans. These criteria provide abasis for NRC licensees and State and local governments to develop acceptable radiological emergency plans and improve emergency preparedness."

In NUREG-0654,Section II, "Planning Standards and Evaluation Criteria,"

Evaluation Criteria ll.B.1 and ll.B.5 address the 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) planning standard.

Evaluation Criteria ll.B. 1 specifies the on-site emergency organization of plant staff personnel forall shifts, and its relation to the responsibilities and duties of the normal shiftcomplement.

Evaluation Criteria l1.B.5 states, in part, that:Each licensee shall specify the positions or title and major tasks to be performed by the persons to be assigned to the functional areas of emergency activity.

Foremergency situations, specific assignments shall be made for all shifts and forplant staff members, both onsite and away from the site. These assignments shall cover the emergency functions in Table B-1 entitled, "Minimum StaffingRequirements for Nuclear Power Plant Emergencies."

Regulatory Guide 1.219, "Guidance on Making Changes to Emergency Plans forNuclear Power Reactors,"

November 2011, describes a method that the NRC considers to be acceptable to implement the requirements in 10 CFR 50.54(q).

In SectionC.2.a.(2),

the NRC encourages licensees to arrange a conference call with the NRCstaff to clarify 10 CFR 50.54(q) requirements and guidance within this regulatory guidefor EP changes to ERO staffing that reduce the licensee's capability to staff positions.

Entergy completed and issued an OSA to satisfy the requirements in 10 CFR 50,Appendix E,Section IV.A.9 and standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2).

The OSA wasperformed using the guidance in NEI 10-05, which has been reviewed by the NRC andfound to be an acceptable methodology to satisfy the regulatory requirement.

As aresult of the OSA, Revision 44 of the SEP increased the minimum on-shift staffing levelto fourteen (14). There were no changes implemented to revise the current on-shift RPand Chemistry Technician staffing listed in Table B-I. The OSA was conducted assuming a response time of 90 minutes for the augmented ERO to allow the use of thisanalysis for a possible future extension in ERO augmentation times as addressed inSection 2.14 of NEI 10-05. No specific emergency response tasks requiring theaugmented ERO were identified in the OSA prior to the 90-minute period following theemergency declaration.

Based on the considerations above, (1) there is reasonable assurance that the healthand safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner,(2) such activities will continue to be conducted in accordance with the site licensing basis, and (3) the approval of the proposed change will not be inimical to the health andsafety of the public.7 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001In conclusion, Entergy has determined that the proposed training requirement changedoes not require any exemptions or relief from regulatory requirements, and does notaffect conformance with any regulatory requirements or criteria.

5.2 No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Entergy has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involvedwith the proposed amendment by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR50.92, "Issuance of amendment,"

as discussed below:1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability orconsequences of an accident previously evaluated?

Response:

No.The proposed training requirements change has no effect on normal plant operation or on any accident initiator.

The change affects the response to radiological emergencies addressed in the SEP. The ability of the emergency responseorganization to respond adequately to radiological emergencies has been evaluated.

Changes in the training provided to the on-shift organization, such as thereassignment of key on-shift emergency personnel to perform related RP functions, provide assurance of an effective emergency response without competing orconflicting duties. An analysis was also performed on the effect of the proposedchange on the timeliness of performing major tasks for the major functional areas ofthe SEP. The analysis concluded that the reduction in training requirements for the"on-shift" Chemistry Technician to support the initial RP support tasks does not affectthe ability to perform the required RP Technician or Chemistry Technician tasks.Therefore, the change in ERG staff training does not increase the probability orconsequences of an accident previously evaluated.

2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accidentfrom any accident previously evaluated?

Response:

No.The proposed change affects the training requirements for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician and for supplementing onsite personnel in response to a radiological emergency.

It has been evaluated and determined not to significantly affect the abilityto perform required or related functions.

It has no effect on the plant design or on thenormal operation of the plant and does not affect how the plant is physically operatedunder emergency conditions.

The reduction in ERG training requirements for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician in the SEP does not affect the plant operating procedures which are performed by plant staff during all plant conditions.

8 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.001No new or different accidents are postulated to occur and there are no changes inany of the accidents previously evaluated.

3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?Response:

No.The proposed change does not affect plant design or method of operation.

10 CFR 50.47 (b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E establish emergency planningstandards and requirements that require adequate

staffing, satisfactory performance of key functional areas and critical tasks, and timely augmentation of the responsecapability.

Since the SEP was originally developed, there have been improvements inthe technology used to support the SEP functions and in the capabilities of onsitepersonnel.

A functional analysis was performed on the effect of the proposed changeon the timeliness of performing major tasks for the functional areas of the SEP. Theanalysis concluded that a reduction in training requirements for the "on-shift" Chemistry Technician would not significantly affect the ability to perform the requiredSEP tasks. Thus, the proposed change has been determined not to adversely affectthe ability to meet the emergency planning standards as described in 10 CER 50.47(b) and requirements in 10 CFR 50 Appendix E.The proposed ERO staff training change does not involve a reduction in any marginof safety. The proposed change is consistent with the original and current EROstaffing levels implemented at PNPS.Based on the above, Entergy concludes that the proposed amendment presents nosignificant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c),

and,accordingly, a finding of "no significant hazards consideration" is justified.Environmental Consideration The proposed changes do not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) anychanges in the types or any increase in the amounts of any effluent that may bereleased

offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

Accordingly, the proposed amendment meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51 .22(c)(9).

Therefore, pursuant to 10CFR 51.22(b),

no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needsto be prepared in connection with the proposed amendment.

9 Attachment I to PNPS Letter 2.16.0016. REFERENCES 6.1. Entergy Letter to the NRC, "Emergency Plan Changes to the Minimum StaffingRequirements for the Emergency Response Organization (ERO)", dated July 14,2006 (Ltr 2.06.062) 6.2. NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation ofRadiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support ofNuclear Power Plants,"

Revision 1, published November 1980.6.3. Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, 10 CFR 50 Appendix E, On-Shift Staffing AnalysisFinal Report, dated December 20, 2012. Incorporated by reference inEmergency Plan Rev 40, submitted to NRC on January 14, 2013 (Ltr 2.13.001).

6.4. James Kim (USNRC) Letter to Mr. Michael Kansler (Entergy),

"Pilgrim NuclearPower Station -Revision to Emergency Plan to Change Emergency SupportO~rganizatiOn Staffing",

(TAC No. MD2814) dated February 5, 20076.5. Federal Register Volume 76, Number 226, Wednesday, November 23, 2011,Rules and Regulations, "Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations; Final Rule."6.6. NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, "Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for NuclearPower Plants,"

Revision 0, November 2011 (ADAMS Accession NumberML1l13010523).

6.7. Entergy Letter to the NRC, "10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section V,: Submittal ofRevised Emergency Plan or Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures",

datedJanuary 30, 1991 (Ltr 2.91 .007)10 ATTACHMENT 2To Entergy Letter No. 2.16.001PNPS Emergency Plan Table B-I, "Minimum StaffingRequirements for the Emergency Response Organization" (1 Page)

Attachment 2 to PNP.S Letter 2.16.001PNPS EMERGENCY PLANTable B-1i:Minimum Staffino Renuirements for the PNPS ERO-(1)Functional Area Major Task TOnshift Position Title Rs+/-Pos.No.

________________

ponsePlant. Operations Plant Stabilization

+/- 1 Shift Manager On Shift#Assessment of Operational Accident Mitigation 2 Control Room Supervisor On Shift#Aspects 3,4 Lic. Nuc. Plant Operator (2) On Shift#______________________

5.6 Unlic. Nuc. Prant Operator (2)**FB On Shift#"Emerg'ency Direction Emergency Classification j1) Shift Manager On Shift#Emergency Control PARs t (1) Shift Manager On Shift#IEmergency Director 60 mai.

Plant Ops Supv 60 min.Notification and Notification of PNPS, Local, (1) Shift Manager On Shift#Communications Commonwealth, and Federal personnel 7 Unlic. Nuc. Plant Operator On Shift#and Maintain Communications Offsite Communicator 30 min.EOF Communicator 60 min.ENS Communicator 60 mai.Rad Accident Assessment!....

EOF Direction EOF Managter, 60 mai.Ops Accident Assessment Offsite Dose Assessment (8) RP Technician***

On Shift#Support (9) Radio Chem. Technician**"

On Shift#Radiolog:ical Assessment Coord 30 mai.Offsite Surveys OMT Member (2) 30 mai.OMT Member (2) 60 min.Onsite and'ln-plan't Surveys 8 RP Technician On Shift#RP Technician (2) 30 min.RP Technician (2) 60 mmn.Chemistry

/ Radiochemistry 9 Radio Chem. Technician On Shlft#_____Radio Chem. Technician 60 mai.Plant System Engineering TSC / OSC Direction Emergency Plant Manager 60 mai.Repair and Corrective Actions Technical Support 10 Engineer (Shift Control Rm)* On Shift#Engineer (Reactor) 30 mai.Engineer (Mechanical) 60 mai._________________________Englineer (Electrical) 60 min.Eguipment Repairs _____Nuclear Maint. Technician 30 min.Corrective Actions Nuclear Maint, Technician 60 main11 Unlic. Nuc. Plant Operator On Shift#12 Nuc. Plant Reactor Operatorm*FB On Shift#Nuc. Plant Reactor Operator 60 min.Nuclear Maint. (ElectnicalX2) 30 mai.Nuclear Maint. (Electrical) 60 min.___________________

________________________________Nuclear Control Technician(2) 30 mai.Protective Actions (In Plant) Radiation Protection, Access Control, (8), (9) RP Technician (2)*0 On Shift#RP Coverage, Personnel Monitoring, RP Technician (2) 30 mai.and Dosimetry

_____RP Technician (2) 60 mai.Fire Fighting 13, 14 Fire Brigade*,

(3 **, 2 [NLO or Sec]) On Shift#____________________

_____Plymouth Fire Dept. On CallRescue Ops and First Aid On Shitt#___________________

________________________Ambulance Service ... On CallSite Access Control and Security Security Force* On Shift#Personnel Accountability

_____________________un onirt -person as saiu ro oe on snurt wnen, ounng normar or au~nonrzeo oventime nours, that person is witnin tiePNPS owner controlled areas or on the connecting roads between them with Station Management approval.

• Position staffed In accordance with technical specifications.

• • Position staffed in accordance with technical specifications and station procedures.

• • May be provided by shift personnel assigned other functions.

.. .(EMP) Emergency Medical Personnel:

individuals qualified as EMPs, RNs, First Responders, and Paramedics.

NOTES: Response times are based on optimum travel conditions.

On Shift Position

1. 7 is Assistant to Offsite Communicator and can be replaced by an SRO that is qualified for the task.On Shift Position

1. 11 can be filled by an RO or SRO that is gualified for the taskOn Shift Positions

1. 13 and #14 are available to support Shift Manager, where qualified, in non-fire events.(1) Thls table B-i is incorporated Into the Emergency Plan In accordance with USNRC Generic Letter 82-33 dated 12/17/82 andIncorporates within 30 days of approval the conclusions of the PNPS On Shift Staffing Analysis Report which is a part of theEmergency Plan in accordance with 10CFR5O Appendix E,Section IV. A. 9 and maintained as a separate document.

B-7Revision 44 ATTACHMENT 3To Entergy Letter No. 2.16.001Chemistry Technician Training2006 Submittal vs 2016 Submittal (3 Pages)

Attachment 3 to PNPS Letter 2.16.001Augmented Radiological Protection (RP) Training needed for the "On-Shift" Chemistry Technician to Support Initial ERO Duties (during first 30 minutes)NUREG0654 Chemistry Technician Training Chemistry Technician Training Justification for Reduced Training ITable B-I Identified in 2006 Submittal Identified in 2016 Comments"On-Shift" (See OSA Analysis notes below)TaskOn-site

• Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool *The 2012 OSA ensured that PNPSand In- Member Qualification Member Qualification ERO team members can accomplish Plant

• Respirator User Qualification

• Perform Radiation Surveys the required mission in the first 90Surveys

• Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus

• Perform Contamination Surveys minutes of ERO activation with theUser Qualification

• Operate Basic Dose Rate Meters current on-shift ERO staff defined in* Walkdown EOP-4 survey point * -Operate Basic Count Rate Meters Table B-I.locations

• Perform Radiation Surveys* Perform Contamination Surveys* Collect an Airborne Radioactivity Sample* Analyze Smears for contamination levels* Analyze Air Samples* Operate Basic Dose Rate Meters* Operate Basic Count Rate Meters* Operate the Scintillation AlphaCounter* Operate the Beta Counter* Operate the Gamma Spec System* Operate the Regulated Air SamplePump* Operate the Radeco Air Sampler1 Attachment 3 to PNPS Letter 2.16.001Augmented Radiological Protection (RP) Training needed for the "On-Shift" Chemistry Technician to Support Initial ERO Duties (during first 30 minutes)NUREG0654 Chemistry Technician Training Chemistry Technician Training Justification for Reduced Training

/Table B-I Identified in 2006 Submittal Identified in 2016 Comments"On-Shift" (See OSA Analysis notes below)TaskAccess *Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool *The 2012 OSA ensured that PNPSControl Member Qualification Member Qualification ERO team members can accomplish

• Control High Radiation Areas the required mission in the first 90* RWP Briefing minutes of ERO activation with the* Perform Stay Time Calculations current on-shift ERO staff defined in* Issue and Return Respirators Table B-i.RP .Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool *The 2012 OSA ensured that PNPSCoverage Member Qualification Member Qualification ERO team members can accomplish for repair,

• Respirator User Qualification

• Perform Radiation Surveys the required mission in the first 90corrective

• SCBA User Qualification

• Perform Contamination Surveys minutes of ERO activation with theactions,

• RP Job Coverage

• Operate Basic Dose Rate Meters current on-shift ERO staff defined insearch and

• Control High Radiation Areas

• Operate Basic Count Rate Meters Table B-I.rescue first

• RWP Briefingaid & Perform Stay Time Calculations firefighting

• Perform Radiation Surveys* Perform Contamination Surveys* Collect an Airborne Sample* Analyze Smears* Analyze Air Samples* Operate Basic Dose Rate Meters* Operate Basic Count Rate Meters* Operate the SAC-4* Operate the BC-4* Operate the Gamma Spec System* Operate the RAS Pump* Operate the Radeco* Perform RP Duties in Response to aPlant Fire___________________

2 Attachment 3 to PNPS Letter 2.16.001Augmented RadiologQical Protection (RP) Training needed for the "On-Shift" Chemistry Technician to SupDport Initial ERO Duties (during first 30 minutes)NUREG0654 Chemistry Technician Training Chemistry Technician Training Justification for Reduced Training

/Table B-I Identified in 2006 Submittal Identified in 2016 Comments"On-Shift" (See OSA Analysis notes below)TaskPersonnel

• Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool

• The 2012 OSA ensured that PNPSMonitoring Member Qualification Member Qualification ERO team members can accomplish

• RP Job Coverage the required mission in the first 90* RWP Briefing minutes of ERO activation with the* Perform Personnel Decontamination current on-shift ERO staff defined inTable B-I.Dosimetry

• Operations Support Center Pool

• Operations Support Center Pool

• No effective change is identified Member Qualification Member Qualification

• Issue and Control Personnel

• Issue Dosimetry Dosimetry OSA Notes:1. The 2012 OSA satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Section IV.A.9. A structured approach was utilized to perform this analysis using the guidance found in NEI10-05, Rev. 0, Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities.

This analysis examined the capability of the minimum staff listed in TableB-i of the PNPS Emergency Plan (E-Plan) to perform the actions for the key functional areas of events described in NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, until augmenting Emergency Response Organization (ERO) staff arrives in accordance with the E-plan.2. The OSA review team determined that an on-shift staff of fourteen (14) is required to respond to the most limiting accident scenario

reviewed, main control room fire andshutdown at the remote shutdown panel.3. NEI 10-05 staffing analysis of on-shift personnel to perform the required emergency planning functions and the licensing basis requirement for each on-shift position.

NEI 10-05recommends one (1) on-shift RP Technician and one (1) on-shift Chemistry Technician.

The PNPS SEP is consistent with the NEI guidance.

4. The primary responsibility for the Chemistry Technician is chemistry/radiochemistry sampling; however no chemistry job tasks were noted as being time critical or requiredduring the first 90 minutes of any of the analyzed events.5. The 2012 OSA analysis included a review of the implementation of the requirement to maintain continuous communications with the notification source during an aircraft threatin accordance with 10CFR50.54(hh) and Reg. Guide 1.214. There are no specific qualifications required to perform this task and the function is not required to be assigned inadvance.

The review of the Aircraft Threat Accident identified that there are sufficient personnel on-shift to perform this action during the event, Specifically, a licensed or non-licensed nuclear plant operator, the rad protection technician, and chemistry technician were all available to fill this function.

6. Augmentation time for some ERO positions is 30 minutes.

The OSA analysis was completed for the 90 minute period since the emergency response facilities are required to beoperational in 60 minutes.

No credit was taken for current 30 minute responders.

Tasks for event response were reviewed for 90 minutes following the declaration.

No specificemergency response tasks requiring the augmented ERO were identified during the 90 minutes following the emergency declaration.

7. The 2012 OSA assumed individuals holding the position of RP technician or Chemistry technician are qualified to perform the range of tasks expected of their position.

ATTACHMENT 4To Entergy Letter No. 2.16.001PNPS Emergency Response Organization On-Shift Staffing Analysis(74 Pages)

PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTENTERGYPILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION10CFR5O APPENDIX EON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSISFINAL REPORTDecember 20, 2012Prepared by:Myra JonesFred Guynn PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTTABLE OF CONTENTSI. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................

4II. ANALYSIS SUMMARY .............................................................................

4A. Emergency Plan Minimum Staffing....................................................................

5B. Other Commitments to Shift Staffing...........................................................

....... 6C. Staffing Exceptions and Time Motion Studies (TMS) ..............................................

6D. Emergency Plan Tasks Not Analyzed

................................................................

7III. ANALYSIS PROCESS ..............................................................................

8IV. ACCIDENT SCENARIOS

...... .....................................................................

9A. Accident Selection........................................................................................

9B. Accident Scenarios included in the Analysis

,......................................................

..9C. Accident Scenarios Not Included in the Analysis

..................................................

10V. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS................................................

11A. Notes and Assumptions Applicable to Pilgrim OSA: ..............................................

11B. NEI 10-05 Assumptions

..................

.........

...................................................

11VI. APPENDIX A -ANALYZED EVENTS AND ACCIDENTS

.....................................

14Vii APPENDIX B -ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS.............................................

16A. Accident Analysis

1. 1 -Design Basis Threat (DBT)...............................................

16B. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 2 -Control Rod Drop Accident..............................

21C. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 4 -Loss of Coolant Accident................................

27D. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 5 -Main Steam Line Break ..................................

33E. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 6 -Fuel Handling Accident

..................................

39F. Accident Analysis

1. 8 -Aircraft Probable Threat ..................................................

45G. Accident Analysis

1. 9 -Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown..................

51H. Accident Analysis

1. 10 -Station Blackout...........................................................

57I. Accident Analysis

1. 11 -LOCA/General Emergency with Release and PAR ................

63VIIIAPPENDIX C TIME MOTIONS STUDIES.......................................................

69A. TMS Shift Manager Safe Shutdown Task...........................................................

69PNPS Page 2 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTIX. OVERLAP OF TASKS ACTIVITIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS IDENTIFIED

...............

73A. Overlap Requiring Compensatory Measures

.....................................................

73X. REFERENCES

...................................................................................

74XI. STAFFING ANALYIS TEAM ....................................................................

74PNPS Page 3PNPSPage 3 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTI. INTRODUCTION This report is the finai report for the On-shift Staffing Analysis (OSA) that commenced at PilgrimNuclear Power Station (PNPS) during the week of March 19 -22, 2012. This OSA satisfies therequirement of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Section IV.A.9, which states that nuclear power licensees shall perform "a detailed analysis demonstrating that on-shift personnel assigned emergency planimplementation functions are not assigned responsibilities that would prevent the timelyperformance of their assigned functions as specified in the emergency plan. "A structured approach was utilized to perform this analysis using the guidance found in NEI 10-05, Rev. 0,Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities.

Thisanalysis examined the capability of the minimum staff listed in Table B-I of the PNPS Emergency Plan (E-Plan) to perform the actions for the key functional areas of events described inNSIRIDPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, untilaugmenting Emergency Response Organization (ERO) staff arrives in accordance with the E-plan.I. ANALYSIS SUMMARYThe OSA team determined that an on-shift staff of fourteen (14) is required to respond to themost limiting accident scenario

reviewed, main control room fire and shutdown at the remoteshutdown panel. The on-shift staff consists of individuals necessary to support each of the E-Planfunctional areas or tasks:* Emergency Direction and Control* Plant Operations and Safe Shutdown (SSD)* Fire Fighting (FB)* Accident Assessment

• Radiation Protection and Chemistry

• Notification/Comnmunication

• Technical Support* Accountability NEI 10-05 states it is acceptable for certain functions or tasks to be assigned to personnel already assigned other primary functions/tasks.

These include Repair and Corrective Action,Rescue Operations and First Aid.PNPS Page 4PNPSPage 4 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTA. Emergency Plan Minimum StaffingPer 10 CFR 50.54 (q)(1)(iii),

Emergency planning function means a capability or resourcenecessary to prepare for and respond to a radiological emergency, as set forth in theelements of section IV of Appendix E and, for nuclear power reactor licensees, theplanning standards of § 50.47(b).

The following table indicates the result of the NEI 10-05 staffing analysis of on-shift-personnel to perform the required emergency planning functions and the licensing basisrequirement for each on-shift position.

Licensing Basis On-ShiftPosition4 Requirement E-Plan Functional Area StaffingAnalysisResults50.54m Emergency Direction andShift Manager (SM) E-plan Table B-I ControlSSD (TMS for SSD1actions)Control Room Supervisor 50.54m(CRS) E-plan Table B-I1SShift Control Room E-plan Table B-I1ehia uprEngineer (STA)Licensed Nuclear Plant 50.54m SSD -Operator (RO #1 ) E-plan Table B-iLicensed Nuclear Plant 50.54m SSD1Operator (RO #2) E-plan Table B-iNon-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i SSD2Plant Operator (NLO #1")1Non-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i E-Plan Communicator Plant Operator (NLO #2)______

Notifications 31Non-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i1BPlant Operator (NLO #3)Non-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i1BPlant Operator (NLO #4)Non-Licensed Nuclear E-plan Table B-i1BPlantOperator_(NLO_#5)

_________

Chemist E-plan Table B-1 Accident1 Assessment/Chemistry1 RP #1 E-plan Table B-i Radiation Protection 1Fire Brigade #11 E-plan Table B-i FB 1Fire Brigade #21 E-plan Table B-i FB 1E-plan Table B-i Per SecuritySecurity Security Accountability Contingency

_____________

Contingency Plan _____________

PlanTOTAL 141Fire Brigade #1 and Fire Brigade #2 positions did not have any actions or tasks identified in thisOSA other than Fire Brigade.

These on-shift members (e.g., NLO, Security) are available tosupport the Shift Manager, where qualified, in non-fire events.2SSD NLO can be filled by RO or SRO.3E-Plan Communicator can be replaced by SRO that is qualified for the task.4One of the 5 NLOs is a Radwaste OperatorPNPSPage 5 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTI-7B. Other Commitments to Shift StaffingNoneC. Staffing Exceptions and Time Motion Studies (TMS)1. The primary responsibility for the Chemistry Technician ischemistry/radiochemistry sampling; however no chemistry job tasks were notedas being time critical or required during the first 90 minutes of any of theanalyzed events. It is therefore acceptable to assign the Chemistry Technician the E-Plan function of dose assessment.

In addition, the RP Technician sharesthe responsibility for dose assessment.

It is recognized,

however, that the ShiftManager will prioritize and utilize the on-shift staff as needed for RP, Chemistry and dose assessment.

No further analysis or TMS is required.

2. The Shift Manager is assigned the responsibility to make some notifications perprocedure 1.3.12. The notifications by phone are considered communications that are approximately one minute in length and are acceptable tasks for the ShiftManager.

No further analysis or TMS is required.

3. The analysis included a review of the implementation of the requirement tomaintain continuous communications with the notification source during anaircraft threat in accordance with 10OCFR50.54(hh) and Reg. Guide 1.214. Thereare no specific qualifications required to perform this task and the function is notrequired to be assigned in advance.

The review of the Aircraft Threat Accidentidentified that there are sufficient personnel on-shift to perform this action duringthe event. Specifically, a licensed or non-licensed nuclear plant operator, the radprotection technician, and chemistry technician were all available to fill thisfunction.

No further analysis TMS is required.

4. A time motion study was completed for the Shift Manager action to perform thesafe shutdown actions to initiate a scram and close the MSIVs by manipulating RPS breakers and pulling fuses. The Shift Manager leaves the control room andpasses the equipment on the way to the Technical Support Center. The ShiftManager demonstrated the safe shutdown actions can be completed inapproximately six (6) minutes while maintaining emergency direction and controlthrough radio contact with other operators aligning safe shutdown equipment.

Details of the TMS are found in section VIII Appendix C.PNPS Page 6PNPSPage 6 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTD. Emergency Plan Tasks Not Analyzed:' 1. Repair and Corrective Action -Per the guidance of NUREG-0654, Table B-I,repair and corrective action tasks may be performed by dedicated shift personnel or qualified shift personnel assigned other functions/tasks.

Repair and corrective action is defined as:*An action that can be performed promptly to restore a non-functional component to functional status (e.g., resetting a breaker),

or to place acomponent in a desired configuration (e.g., open a valve), and which doesnot require work planning or implementation of lockout/tagout controls tocomplete.

In accordance with NEI 10-05 section 2.5, the analysis included a review of therepair and corrective action tasks. For the purpose of this analysis, the taskswere considered to fall into two broad categories:

• Unplanned/unexpected actions that address equipment failures.

Theseactions are contingent in nature and cannot be specified in advance.* Planned/expected actions performed in support of operating procedure implementation, including severe accident management guidelines.

At PNPS, a Nuclear Plant Reactor Operator on shift will primarily be available tothe Shift Manager to perform actions to assist in controlling/mitigating the event.Initial corrective actions are contained in and controlled by plant operating procedures.

The Nuclear Plant Operators have been trained to perform specificactions within the Abnormal and Emergency Operating Procedures andmaintenance support is not required.

Maintenance is not included in the on-shiftstaff. Repair and Corrective Action is an acceptable collateral duty per theguidance of NEI 10-05 and was not analyzed2. Rescue Operations and First Aid: in accordance with NEI 10-05 section 2.6, theanalysis also included a review of rescue operations and first aid response.

Perthe guidance of NUREG-0654, Table B-i, rescue operations and first aid may beperformed by shift personnel assigned other functions/tasks.

The fire brigademembers (NLOs) are trained to perform rescue operations and are assigned thetask should the need arise. Additionally, select Security staff members aretrained to First Responder standards and meet the basic requirements to renderfirst aid and CPR. Should first aid be required during a hostile action securityevent, first aid actions will be performed after the security threat is neutralized and the site is secure. Rescue operations and first aid were not required in any ofthe accident scenarios reviewed.

Rescue operation and first aid are acceptable collateral duties per the guidance of NEI 10-05 and was not analyzed.

PNPS Page 7PNPSPage 7 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTIll. ANALYSIS PROCESSThis analysis was conducted by a joint team of corporate Emergency Preparedness (EP)personnel and station personnel from the Operations, Operations

Training, EP Training, Radiation Protection, Chemistry and Emergency Preparedness (EP) departments.

Additionally, personnel from Security provided input to the analysis when necessary.

The team members areidentified in Section Xl of this report.The emergency response to each event scenario was determined by conducting a tabletop of theevent using the emergency plan and procedures and the applicable department procedures suchas Operations emergency and abnormal operating procedures.

Each scenario was reviewed by the cross disciplinary team to determine what plant actions andemergency plan implementation actions were required based on plant procedures prior to staffaugmentation.

These actions were then compared to the minimum staffing for Emergency Planimplementation as described in the Emergency Plan Table B-I, ensuring that no actions wereassigned to staff members that conflicted with either their dedicated emergency plan role or theirdedicated operational role as appropriate.

In cases where multiple tasks were assigned to anindividual in their role, the team evaluated timing of the' tasks to ensure that they could beperformed by the individual in series within any specified time requirements.

The results of the analysis for each of the scenarios are included in Section VII, APPENDIX B -ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS.

Note that NSIR DPR-ISG-01 states that only DBA accidents "which would result in an emergency declaration" should be evaluated in the staffing assessment.

Each of PNPS DBA's were evaluated and classified according to its FSAR Chapter 14description.

If the accident description alone did not result in a classification, the projected accident EAB dose found in the ESAR was utilized to determine if an EAL threshold would beexceeded within the first 60 minutes using the Abnormal Rad Level EAL thresholds.

In caseswhere several projected dose rates were provided or release data was not detailed significantly todetermine an EAL, the assessment used the radiological consequences associated with therealistic case in accordance with NEI 10-05.PNPS Page 8PNPSPage 8 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTIV. ACCIDENT SCENARIOS A. Accident Selection

1. The OSA scenarios were chosen using the guidance of NE1 10-05 andNSIR/DPR-ISG-01, "interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for NuclearPower Plants."

The evaluation considered the station Design Basis Accidents (DBA) described in the FSAR along with additional scenarios specified by theguidance documents.

The scenarios considered were:* Design Basis Threat (DBT) ground assault* DBA Control Rod Drop Accident* DBA Loading Error Accident* DBA Loss of Coolant Accident* DBA Main Steam Line Break Accident* DBA Fuel Handling Accident* DBA Radwaste System Accident* Aircraft Probable Threat* Fire Requiring Evacuation of the Control Room and Plant ShutdownFrom Alternate

Location,

• Station Blackout, (SBO)* LOCA/General Emergency with release and PARa LOCA with entry into Severe Accident Management

• Fire Resulting in Reactor Trip (Appendix R fire)B. Accident Scenarios included in the Analysis1. Design Basis Threat as described in NE! 10-05* Land and/or waterborne Hostile Action directed against the Protected Area by a Hostile Force. This event assumes the threat is neutralized immediately when inside the protected area fence, no significant damageto equipment or systems that require corrective actions before the EROis staffed, no radiological

release, and no fire that requires firefighting response before the ERO is staffed2. Control Rod Drop Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.1* One control rod drops and reactor trips on APRM 120% flux scram.Credit is not taken for MSIV closure.

Release pathway is throughcondenser, turbine building then to environment.

EAL is based oncondenser release information in FSAR.3. Loss of Coolant Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.3* Double ended guillotine break of a recirculation line. All ECCS operate-as designed.

EAL is based on fission product barrier EALs.4. Main Steam Line Break Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.4* Break of one main steam line and followed by MSIV closure.

Release isto the atmosphere through the top of the turbine building (puff release).

PNPSPage 9 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTReactor coolant activity at TS limit. No EAL On the accident but on theUSAR EAB 2-hr dose.5. Fuel Handling Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.5* The accident involves a dropped fuel bundle on top of the core. InitialEAL is based on the event.6. Aircraft Probable Threat (50.54hh)

• Notification is received from the NRC that a probable aircraft threat exists(>5 minutes,

<30 minutes)7. Control Room Fire and Alternate Shutdown* A fire occurs in the main control room requiring the evacuation and theprocedure implemented to perform shutdown from the alternate shutdown panels.8. Station Blackout* A loss of all offsite AC power occurs and the failure of the emergency diesel generators.

9. General Emergency with release and "PAR* Assume GE condition with dose projection indication of a release greaterthan the protective action guideline (PAG).C. Accident Scenarios Not Included in the Analysis1. Loading Error Accident as described in ESAR 14.1.5.2* Misloaded bundle in the core. No EAL condition is met.2. Radwaste System Accident as described in FSAR 14.5.6* No EAL condition is met.3. Implement SAMG* A review of the SAMGs associated with the initial site-specific Candidate High Level Actions concluded that no actions would require on-shiftpersonnel other than licensed and non-licensed operators.

No analysisrequired.

4. Appendix R Fire* Fire leading to reactor trip with complications.

The control room fire andalternate shutdown requires more resources and actions outside thecontrol room than this fire. The team concluded the control room firebounds the fire analysis.

No additional analysis required.

PNPS Page 10PNPSPage 10 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTV. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS A. Notes and Assumptions Applicable to Pilgrim OSA:1. The RP and Chemistry tasks reviewed were those directed by the Shift Managerto support actions in Abnormal Operating Procedures (AOP), Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP), and Emergency Implementing Procedures (EIP).Any additional tasks directed by the Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support Center (OSC), or Emergency Operations Facility (EOF') procedures werenot reviewed.

2. The augmentation time for some ERO positions is 30 minutes.

The analysis wascompleted for the 90 minute period since the emergency response facilities arerequired to be operational in 60 minutes.

No credit was taken for 30 minuteresponders.

Tasks for event response were reviewed for 90 minutes following thedeclaration.

No specific emergency response tasks requiring the augmented ERO were identified during the 90 minutes following the emergency declaration.

3. The OSA team determined there are no time critical RP and Chemistry tasks andthat task performance is directed and prioritized by the Shift Manager.

The timeRP or Chemistry is directed to perform a task and the amount of time taken tocomplete tasks are estimated.

No Chemistry samples are required by TechSpecs within the 90 minute period after a declaration.

Since the Shift Managerdirects when the tasks are performed, there are no overlapping RP or chemistry tasks.4. All crews have one individual filling the SM and one individual filling the STAroles therefore the analysis did not consider using a dual-role individual.

B. NEI 10-05 Assumptions

1. Response time used for this analysis was the maximum acceptable number ofminutes elapsed between emergency declaration and the augmented EROposition holder at a location necessary to relieve an on-shift position of theemergency response task. (60 mmn.)2. On-shift personnel complement was limited to the minimum required number andcomposition as described in the site emergency plan. If the plan commitments allow for different minimum staffing levels (e.g., a variance between a normaldayshift and a backshift),

use the staffing with the smallest total number ofpersonnel.

3. Although the temporary absence of a position may be allowed by Tech Specs,the analysis was performed assuming that all required on-shift positions arefilled.4. Event occurred during off-normal work hours where ERO was offsite and allrequired minimum on-shift positions were filled.5. On-shift personnel reported to their assigned response locations withintimeframes sufficient to allow for performance of assigned actions.PNPSPage 11 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT6. On-shift staff has necessary Radiation Worker qualification to obtain normaldosimetry and enter the RCA (but not locked high or very high radiation areas)without the aid of a RP technician.

7. Personnel assigned plant operations and safe shutdown meets the requirements and guidance (analyzed through other programs such as operator training) andwas evaluated as part of this assessment unless a role/function/task fromanother major response area was assigned as collateral duty.8. In-plant (manual) safety related operator actions to manipulate components andequipment from locations outside the control room to achieve and maintain safeshutdown was done by a member of the on-shift staff as defined in the unit'sTech Specs.9. Fire brigade (FB) staff performance is analyzed through other station programs(e.g., fire drills) and was not evaluated as part of this assessment unless arole/function/task from another major response area was assigned as a collateral duty.10. Individuals holding the position of RP technician or Chemistry technician arequalified to perform the range of tasks expected of their position.

11. Security was not evaluated unless a role or function from another major responsearea was assigned as a collateral duty.12. Communications, briefings, and peer checks are acceptable collateral duties.13. All on-shift staff positions were evaluated, even if they had no known collateral duties, to ensure they can perform the tasks assigned to them. [Ref NSIRIDPR-ISG-01]14. The Staffing Analysis specified the resources available to perform "Repair andCorrective Actions" and "Rescue Operations and First Aid" but these may beassigned as collateral duty to a designated on-shift responder.

15. For assessment

purposes, NRC notifications were treated as a continuous actionper 10OCFR50.72(c)(3) and 73.71 (b)(1). This means once the initial NRCcommunications are established, the NRC will request an open line bemaintained with the NRC Operations Center.16. DBA (postulated

accident, Condition IV event, or limiting fault) is considered as"Unanticipated occurrences that are postulated for accident analysis purposesbut not expected to occur during the life of the plant. A postulated accident couldresult in sufficient damage to preclude resumption of plant operation.

As a result,a greater number and variety of actions would need to be implemented by plantpersonnel."

17. Unless otherwise specified in NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, or by the FSAR initial conditions of a DBA analysis, it was assumed that the unit was in Mode 1, Power.PNPSPage 12 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT18. DBT assumed a hostile force breached the protected area fence but wasneutralized with no adverse consequen~ces to plant safety. Damage inflicted onplant systems, structures and components was not sufficient to prevent safeshutdown or cause a radiological release.

There was no fire significant enough towarrant firefighting efforts prior to arrival of offsite resources and/or theaugmented ERO.19. The Staffing Analysis used DBA analysis assumptions, inputs, and timing ofevents as documented in the FSAR.20. In cases where a DBA analysis included a radiological

release, and the startingpoint of the release was not clearly defined, the staffing analysis assumed thatthe release began at the time of declaration of the initiating event.21. Severe Accident Management Guideline (SAMG) -It is sufficient to simplyassume that the accident progressed to conditions requiring a severe accidentresponse; it is not necessary to determine specific failures and the accidentsequence.

22. SAMG -The actions to be analyzed include those that implement the initial site-specific actions assuming the core is no ex-vessel (i.e., no reactor vessel failure),

and there is not actual or imminent challenge to containment integrity.

PNPS Page 13PNPSPage 13 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTVI. APPENDIX A -ANALYZED EVENTS AND ACCIDENTS E e t E e t S~ummary Descriptioniof~i Plant...

.... ...... '"== ..:I ....:* : Refe~rence = ......' "= '

iEn t ype- ::::::: :;:, Event.Mode..Document:s)

Event ECL.1 DBT Land and/or waterborne 1 NEI 10-05 Site Area YesHOSTILE ACTION Emergency directed against the ISG IV.CProtected Area by aHOSTILE FORCE.2 DBA Control Rod Drop Accident 1 FSAR 14.5.1 Site Area YesEmergency 3 DBA Loading Error Accident 1 FSAR 14.5.2 None Noz(misloaded bundle in the______core) 4 DBA Loss of Coolant Accident 1 FSAR 14.5.3 General Yes______Emergency 5 DBA Main Steam Line Break 1 FSAR 14.5.4 Site Area YesEmergency 6 DBA Fuel Handling Accident 5 FSAR 14.5.5 Site Area YesEmergency 7 DBA Radwaste System 1 FSAR 14.5.6 None Accident8 Assumed Aircraft Probable Threat 1 10CFR50.54hh Alert Yesfor (1)analysispurpose RG 1.2149 Assumed Control Room Evacuation 1 FSAR 14.6.1 Alert Yesfor and Alternate ShutdownAnalysis (fire in main control room) I0CFR50Purpose Appendix RFire HazardAnalysis10 Assumed Station Blackout 1 ISG IV.C Site Area Yesfor Emergency analysispurpose11 Assumed LOCA -General 1 ISG IV.C General Yesfor Emergency with Emergency Analysis radiological release and____Purpose PAR12 Assumed LOCA with entry into 1 ISG IV.C General for severe accident Emergency Analysis procedures.

Purpose ________________________

_____PNPS Page 14PNPSPage 1.4 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT13 Assumed Appendix R Fire I ISG IV.C AlertNoforAnalysis____ Purpose _____________

____ _______1Plant mode per FSAR or assumed for anaiysis purpose2No EAL met on plant condition or dose.3pNPS does not meet the NEI110-05 intent for the analysis of implementing SAMG. NEI 10-05 Section2.11 states that the analysis of the ability to implement SAMG focuses on the reasonably expected initialmitigation action that would be performed by on-shift personnel other than licensed and non-licensed operators.

The actions assessed by NEI 10-05 are those which implement the initial site-specific Candidate High Level Action assuming the core is not ex-vessel (i.e., no reactor vessel failure),

and thereis no actual or imminent challenge to containment integrity.

PNPS does include maintenance qualified toperform maintenance job tasks in minimum staffing and does not have contingency actions that must becompleted by maintenance in the severe accident procedures.

4Appendix R Fire is bound by the Control Room Fire and Alternate Shutdown.

Analysis is not required.

PNPS Page 15PNPSPage 15 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTVII. APPENDIX B] -ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSISA. Accident Analysis

1. 1 -Design Basis Threat (DBT)1. Accident Summary* Land and/or waterborne HOSTILE ACTION directed against theProtected Area by a HOSTILE FORCE. Assume adversary characteristics defined by the Design Basis Threat. Security Code Redcondition

2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* This event assumes the threat is neutralized immediately when insidethe protected area fence, no significant damage to equipment or systemsthat require corrective actions before the ERO is staffed, no radiological

release, and no fire that requires firefighting response before the ERO isstaffed.* Assume at power in Mode 1* Security notifies the Shift Manager of condition Security Code RED.* Assume all non-security staff is located inside the protected area at theirnormal work station when the event occurs.* Assume all systems function and the core remains covered.

No fueldamage and no release.3. Procedures Reviewed for Accident Response* Procedure 5.3.14, Security Incident* EP-IP-1 00, Classification and Notifications

• EP-IP-1 00.1, EAL* EP-IP-410, Evacuation and Assembly* Procedure 2.1.6, Reactor ScramPNPS Page 16PNPSPage 16 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesPNPS TABLE V-ON-SHIFT POSITIONT2/L1T5/L1T5/L31 Shift Manager Emergency Plan 60 T5/L5. No YesTable B-i T5/L6T5/L8T5/L10________________

_______________T5/L 14 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _2Control Room Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo Supervisor Table B-IShift Technical EegnyPa 2L3 Advisor/Shift Engineer ablrenc B-i n 60 T2/L3 No No(3rd SRO) Table_____B-1

___T5___L__

Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L oN4 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B-iN/ 24NoNLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa5 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B lai N/A T2/L5 No No*Non-Licensed 6 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A T2/L6 No NoO)perator (NLO #1) abe-Nlon-Licensed T5/L97 .cea lat Emergency Plan 60 T5/L1 1 No NoNuclea Plant able B-iOperator (NLO #2) _______ T5/L1 3 ____Non-Licensed 8 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed 9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #f4) al -Non-Licensed 10 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #5) al -ii Fire Brigade #1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No______________

Table B-I1________

_____12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No______________

Table B-I1________

_____13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 N/A No NoTechnician Table B-I1________

_____14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60 N/A No No_____ _____ ____ Table B-I1________

_____Security Contingenc) 15 Security Plan / E-Plan Table 60 T5/Li15 No No_____ _____ ____ B-i1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _PNPSPage 17 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNPS TABLE 2-~ PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN.

~ One Unit-One Control RoomAnalysis

1. 1 beT Security Thr~atMinimuin~Operat;ons Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and ~9~s orSAMGs if Applicable

Licensed Operator Training1 Shift Manager Shift Manager ProgramSuperisoricensed Operator Training2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Sprio ProgramLicensed Operator Training3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Program4Licensed Nuclear Plant ~Licensed Operator TrainingRatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Program5Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator TrainingRatrOeao#2Operator

1. 2 Program6 uiliry pertor#1Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator6___ Auxi___iary

___Operator_______Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 IOther needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_______________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A Nl/A13 I&C Technician N/A Nl/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A Nl/APNPS Page 18PNPSPage 18 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLinAFie PeromdbrakAayi ontetoProligramehd 1 N/A Fire Protection Program2 N/A Fire Protection Program3 N/A Fire Protection ProgramNote: This accident does not include the need for firefighting, first aid or search & rescue.1n-#ntSrvy DBTiThreati 2 n-it Srvy1 In-lan SurveyaeN/A25On-site SRveyN/A3 Ptersonnelseii Monitosring):

N/AN/A6 Othermistey spectific task #1 (describe)

N/__ A__Note: No chemistry or RP job function tasks for the conditions described in the DBT assumptions.

RP andChemistry take cover as directed.

I:.. PNSTAL~5-EMERGENCY

PLAN I:MPLEMENTATION

, :: .PNPSPage 19 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTDeclare the emergency classification level Shift Manager Emergency Planning Training1 ECL)Program

/ EP DrillsApprove Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning TrainingN/AcmenaiosProgram 3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Pmrogram Plnin rannEmergency Planning Training4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A ProgramLicensed Operator TrainingNotification and direction to on-shift staff SitMngr Porm/EegnyPann

( e.g., to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) SitMngr .raiigra P mrogram ,PnnnEmergency Planning Training6 ERO notification Shift Manager ProgramAbbreviated NRC notification for DBT SALicensed Operator Training7event TAProgram 8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Pmrogram Plnin rannEmrogenyPlninarann 9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Pmrogram Plnin rannProgram11 Ativae EDS NO#2Emergency Planning Training11 civae ERS NO#2Program N/A (per scenario Emergency Planning Training12 Offsite radiological assessment asmtos rgaEmemtns rogenyPlninarann 13 Perform NRC notifications NLO#2 Pmrogram Plnin rannPerform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, Shift Manager PrgaINPO, ANI, etc.) Program_________________

15 Iersnne Accuntbilty SecuityOffcer Security Training Program / EP15 Prsonel ccontablit Secrit Offcer DrillsPNPS Page 20PNPSPage 20 (PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTB. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 2 -Control Rod Drop Accident1. Accident Summary* The control rod drop accident (CRDA) results from an assumed failure ofthe control rod-to-drive mechanism coupling after the control rod (veryreactive rod) becomes stuck in its fully inserted position.

It is assumedthat the control rod drive is then fully withdrawn before the stuck rod fallsout of the core. The control rod velocity

limiter, an engineered safeguard, limits the control rod drop velocity.

The resultant radioactive materialrelease is maintained far below the guideline values of 10OCFR50.67.

• The worst case CRDA occurs during mechanical vacuum pumpoperation.

The mechanical vacuum pump trips and the radionuclides aretrapped in the condenser at atmospheric pressure to leak directly to theenvironment.

The condenser leakage scenario is bounding for PNPS.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* The FSAR assumes the MSIVs, MSL drains, and reactor water samplevalves remain open.* The OSA assumes a realistic case of an immediate release from thecondenser to the environment via the turbine building roof resulting in thecondenser leakage EAB dose.* The EAL is based on 1-hr (1/2) of the FSAR EAB dose.3. Procedures Reviewed for Accident Response* 2.4.40, Rapid Increase in main Steam Line or Offgas Activity* EIP-IP-1 00, Classification and Notification

• EIP-100.1, EALs* EIP-EP-410, Evacuation and Assembly* 2.1.6, Reactor Scram* EOP-5, Radiological Release Control* 6.1-220, Radiological Controls for Risk Evolutions

• ARP-C904LC Alarm Response Procedure

• 7.4.64, PRM Alarm Response* 7.3.11, Reactor and Hotwell Water Analysis Preparation PNPS Page 21PNPSPage 21 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesT5/L3T5/L5Emergency Plan 60 No5YesI Shift Manager Table B-I T5/L6 NoYeT5/L8T5/L 10______ ______ ___ __ ______ ______T5/L14

______2Control Room Emergency PlanN/T/LNoo Supervisor Table B-IShift Technical EegnyPa 2L oN3 Advisor/Shift EmrecPan6T2L NooEng]ineer (3rd SRO) Table B-I16Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa /4 Plant Operator (RO Emrec lnNAT2/L4 No NoI) ~~~~able B-I1______

Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa /5 Plant Operator (RO Emrec lnNAT2/L5 No No2)Table B-iNon-Licensed EegnyPa /6 Nuclear Plant Emrec lnNAT2/L6 No No'O p e ra to r (N L O # 1 ) T a b le B -I1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Nlon-Licensed Emrec lnT5/L97 Nluclear Plant Emrec ln60 T5/L11I No NoFable B-IOperator (NLO #2) _________T5/L13 Nlon-Licensed EegnyPa / / oN8 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / / oNOperator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed Emergency PlanN/NANoo 9 Nuclear Plant aeB-N/NA NooOperator (NLO #4) al -Non-Licensed IEmergency PlanN/Noo 10 Nuclear PlantN/NA NooOperator (NLO #5) beB- /11 Fire Brigade #1 Emergency PlanN/NANoo

_______ _______ able B-i1/ / oN12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No______________

Fable B-I1________

13 RP / Chemistry IEmergency Plan 60 T5/L12 No NoTechnician B-i1________

_____14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60 T4/L1 No No_____ _____ _____ able B-I1_ _ _ __ _ _ _Security Contingencyl 15 Security / E-Plan Table 60 T5/L1 5 No NoL PNP TABLE E2 -PLANT p OE RkTIQNS SH

° IPNPSPage 22 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT%

e nit ne Control R oom :,".....

..........

= = =::; 2Anlyis#1Control Robd DroD Accident iLine # Generic TitlelRole On-Shift Position Task Analysis Controlling MethodLicensed Operator Training1 Shift Manager Shift Manager ProgramSuperisorLicensed Operator Training2 U~nit Supervisor Control Room SuevsrProgram 3 Shft echicalAdvsorLicensed Operator Training3 Sif Tchica AviorShift Engineer/STA ProgramLicensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator Training4 Reactor Operator

1. 1Oprtr#Prga Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator Training5 Reactor Operator

1. 2Oprtr2Poga 6 uiliry pertor#1Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator6 uxliryOpraor#1Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 &uxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic TitlelRole On-Shift Position Task Analysis________________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 l&C Technician N/A N/A,14 O3ther N/A N/A15 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 23PNPSPage 23 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade:;: : ::::} :.: i , Analysis~#

2 Control Rod Drop

=, ;= i¢ J:1 N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A5 N/A N/ANote: The CRDA does not include the need for firefighting.

PNS ag 2PNPSPage 24 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPostio Prfomig Aalyis#2 onrolRo DrpAccid I In-Plant Survey:_RP#1X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X2 On-site Survey:_-

NI/A3 Personnel Mlonitoring:

N/A _T Job Coverage:

N/A5 Offsite Rad,ssessment:

(Included in Table ,56 Other site specificRP (describe):

N/A7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

N/A8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

N/A*Performance Times are estimated Notes: The following RP and Chemistry tasks are performed as prioritized by the Shift Manager and arenot time critical for the first 120 minutes.* Post scram in plant surveys (6.1.-220 Att 1.0) directed by the CRS (2.1.6) RB in area of scramheaders and tanks. =3 hours to complete*Onsite surveys after enter EOP-5* As directed by SM from checklist (EP-IP-100),

RP techs assume the responsibility for onsiteradiological controls using RP coordinators procedure EP-IP-261 Att 9.6.* Chemistry secure oxygen injection to condensate pumps as directed by the CRS (2.1.6)* Rx coolant sample (7.4.64, 7.3.11) directed in 2.1.6'as one of the methods to confirm radincrease,

however, ARP-C904LC directs operators to close the sample valves because ofradiation indication (MSL hi-hi rad). Coolant sample cannot be obtained until conditions allowopening the sample valves. T.S coolant sample is not required until 2-6 hours after shutdown.

Takes =30 minutes to complete.

• Procedure2.1.6 directs Offgas sample (not time critical) but it isolates.

Sample not requiredduring the 60 minutes.PNPS Page 25PNPSPage 25 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT~.NSTBE5EMRECPLNIMPLEMENTATIOQN

-:: -i: 'Declre he mergncyclasifiatin lvelEmergency PlanningDelr1h megnycasfiainivlShift Manager ' raining Program / EP(ECL) Drills2 pprove Offsite Protective Action N/ .Emergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Eraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A Eraining ProgamnnLicensed OperatorINotification and direction to on-shift staff Training Program /5 Shift Manager EegnyPann (e.g., to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) TingmrenYoralang Emergency Planning6 ERO notification Shift ManagerrangPorm Licensed Operator7 ,bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/ArangPorm Emergency Planning8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Tann rgaEmrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLricnsed OPeraogra 10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift Manager raiicnge POgeramo11 EnS Planning11 ctvateERDS LO#Training Program12 Offsite radiological assessment Chemistry Tcnia Eeraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NILO#2 Eraining ProgamnnPerform other site-specific event Licensed Operator14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, Shift Manager Training ProgramINPO, ANI, etc.) __________

15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 26PNPSPage 26 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTC. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 4 -Loss of Coolant Accident1. Accident Summary* This event involves the postulation of a spectrum of piping breaks insidecontainment varying in size, type, and location.

Break of a large .recirculation pipe represents the limiting pipe break inside thecontainment.

Reactor scram, MSIVs isolate, ECCS initiates and injects.* Radiological release to the atmosphere was assumed to occur viadrywell leakage, MSIV leakage, and ECCS leakage.

DW and ECCS flowthrough SGTS and released to the environment through the main stack.MSIV leakage is ground level, unfiltered release through the condenser and high pressure turbine.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* No operator action for the first 10 minutes when they initiate one RHR inContainment Cooling.* EAL is based on FSAR EAB dose.3. Procedures for Accident Response* EP-IP-1 00, Emergency Classification and Notification

• EP-IP-100.1.

Emergency Action Levels* EP-IP-300, Offsite Radiological Dose Assessment

• EOP-01, RPV Control* EOP-3, Primary Containment Control* EOP-4, Secondary Containment Control* EOP-5, Radiological Release* 2.1.6, Reactor Scram* EP-IP-240, Emergency Security Organization Activation and Response* 6.3-064, EOP-4 Surveys* EP-I P-400, Protective Action Recommendation PNPS Page 27PNPSPage 27 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesT2/LIT5/L1T5/L3T5/L41 Shift Manager Emergency Plan Table 60 T5/L5 No YesB-i T51L6T5/L8T5/L10____ ____ ____ ___ ___ ____ ____ ___ ____ ___ T5/L14_ _ _ _ _ _2 ontrol Room Emergency Plan Table N/T2LNooSupervisor B-iShift Technical EmrecPlnTbe 6T2LNoo3 EmrecPlnTbe 6T2LNoo__ _Engineer (3rd SRO) B-iLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa al / 2L oNLiceanse Nueratr(R Emergency Plan Table N/A T2/L4 No NoNnLicensedNula 65 ula Plant Oeao R Emergency Plan Table N/A T2/L6 No NoOperatr (NL #1) -iNon-LicensedT5L 6 Nucler Plant Emergency Plan Table NAT2LNooOperator (NLO #2) ______ TL1 ______Non-Licensed Emrgnc/PanTal 8 Nuclear Plant B-ignc N/ATale 6 N5/A1 No NoOperator (NLO #3) T5/L13____

_____________

Non-Licensed 9 ula ln Emergency Plan Table N/A N/A No NoNuclar Pant B-iOperator (NLO #4) ______Non-Licensed EegnyPa al10 Nuclear Plant B-igny la abe N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #4)______

10 FireBiade

1. 1an Emergency Plan Table N/A N/A No No_____ _____ ____ B-i1_ _ _ _ _ _12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan Table N/A N/A No No13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan Table 60 T5/L12 No NoTechnician B-i1______

______14 RP Technician Emergency Plan Table 60 T4/L1 No NoB-i1______

T4/L2 __ ____ ______15 Security Security Contingency 60 T5/L1 5 No No______________Plan

/ E-Plan Table B-i1 ______ _______ ____________

PNPSPage 28 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLine # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis1 Shift Manager Shift Manager raiicnge POperamo______ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ __ TrainingProg~ram 3 Licensed OperatorShift TuehialAvisor Shiftro Engine uer/STA r Trainingl ProgramLicesed uclar Pant Licensed Operator4 SReato Operhiat dior #Shperto

1. 1inerSTraining Prog~ram5 eco prtr# Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#2Operator

1. 12 Training Program6 uxiciary Operator

1. 1 NnLicensed Nuclear Pl n on-Licensed OperatorPln Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 21/8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A X/9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A X/10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A /Other (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic TitlelRole On-Shift Position Task AnalysisControlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 I&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 29PNPSPage 29 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade5 N/A N/ANote: The LOCA does not include a fire.PNPS Page 30PNPSPage 30 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLRP#1(ositionPromen requirements)

& asdirected by SM _2 On-site Survey:X X X X X X X X3 Personnel Monitoring:

N/AT Job Coverage:

N/A__50Offsite RadAssessment:

(Included in Table56 Other site specificRP (describe):

N/A7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

N/A8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

.__N/A*Prorac Times are estimated PNPS Page 31PNPSPage 31 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTi ! Func ion. Task O rrS it i P A nalysis:................

Emergency Planning1 Declare the emergency classification level Shift Manager Training Program / EP(ECL) Drills2 pprove Offsite Protective Action SitMngrEmergency Planning2 Recommendations ShfTangrraining ProgramEmergency Planning3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift ManagerrangPorm Emrgencyg Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnNotiicaionand iretio to n-siftstaf (eg.,Licensed Operator Trainingto assembleio evacuaireten etc.) siftff(.

Shift Manager Program I Emergency

_____assemb

_____e,__evacuate,______et___.___Planning Training ProgramEmergency Planning6 ERO notification Shift Manager Training Program7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A Lcne prtrTann____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ rogramEmergency Planning8 Complete State/local notification form Shift ManagerrangPorm Emrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civat ERD raiingProgram 11 AciTechnicianO#2Emergency Planning12' Offsite radiological assessment Chemistry ehnca Emraining Progamnn13 Prfom NR noifiatios NO#2Emergency Planning13 Prfom NR noifiatios NO#2Training Program14Perform other site-specific event notifications SitMngrLicensed Operator Training(e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Program__________________

15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 32PNPSPage 32 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTD. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 5 -Main Steam Line Break1. Accident Summary* This event involves the postulation of a large steam line pipe breakoutside containment.

It is assumed that the largest steam lineinstantaneously and circumferentially breaks at a location downstream ofthe outermost isolation valve. The plant is designed to detectimmediately such an occurrence, initiate isolation of the broken line, andactuate the necessary protective features.

This postulated eventrepresents the envelope evaluation of steam line failures outsidecontainment.

2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* Emergency Classification is not required based on the break of the mainsteam line. This analysis EAL is based on the FSAR MSLB accident EABdose.3. Procedures for Accident Response* EP-IP-IO00, Emergency Classification and Notification

• EP-IP-1 00.1. Emergency Action Levels* EP-IP-300, Offsite Radiological Dose Assessment

• EOP-01, RPV Control* EOP-3, Primary Containment Control* EOP-5, Radiological Release* 2.1.6, Reactor Scram* EP-IP-300, Offsite Radiological Dose Assessment

• 6.3-064, EOP-4 SurveysPNPS Page 33PNPSPage 33 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. Tablesi

,,

= A P PE.N D IX B =:=:, i ::'On-shift Pos =itin E-Pan:= Reference..

=Augnmertation Role In Tlable Unana...................yzed............

T2/LIT5/L1T5/L31 SitMngr Emergency Plan 60 TISNo YesShf aae able B-I T5/L6T5/L8T5/L10T5/L 142 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No NoSupervisor Table B-iShift Technical 3 Advisor/Shift Emergency Plan 6 2L oN____Engineer,_(

3rd SRO) Table B-I 0T/L oNLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L4 Plant Operator (RO Tablgenc B-I/AT2L No No______ 1)Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L5 lant Operator (RO Emrec ln NAT/5No No____2) Table B-INon-Licensed 6 Nuclear Plant Emergenc Plan N/A T2/L6 No No____Operator (NLO #1)TalB-Non-Licensed T5/L97 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan 6 5L oNOperator (NLO #2)al -T5/L1 3 _____Non-Licensed 8 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #3)TalB-Non-Licensed 9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A NIA No No____Operator (NLO #4) al -Non-Licensed 10 NcerPat Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No____Operator (NLO #5 al -11 Fire Brigade #1 Emergency Plan NIA N/A No No_____ _____________

Table B-i1______

______12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No_____ _____________

Table B-I1______

______13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 T5/L12 No No____echnician Table B-I14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60 T4/L1 No NoT____________able B-I T4/L2Security15 Security Contingency Plan 60 T5/L15 No No___________________

/ E-Plan Table B-i1 _____________

_____________

PNPS Page 34PNPSPage 34 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNPS TABLE 2- =PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN=

i : ;i;i Analysis

1. 5 MaIn SteamrLneBak(LB Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AQPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line =# Generic Titl~elRole

'!:: : = On-Shift i :i Tsk Anialysisl ,1 Shft anaer SiftMangerLicensed OperatorShiftManagerShiftManager raining Program2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator_______Training Program3 Licensed OperatorShift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Training Program4 RatrOeao#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Training Program5 RatrOeao#2Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#2Operator

1. 2 Training Program6 Auxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed OperatorPlant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 jOther needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line'# Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_________________________

_______________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 l&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A Nl/APNPS Page 35PNPSPage 35 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade1 N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A5 N/A N/ANote: The MSLB analysis does not include a fire.PNPS Page 36PNPSPage 36 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT: ......... ,.,:,;Analysis

1. 5 M ain Steam : Line ,Break: M

.... ..........

...I Function

/ Task __ __ ___;____!

N 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85-E 010 15 20 25 30 35 4045 50 55 60 65 70 75 8085 901 In-Plant Survey:_RP#1 X X X X X X2 On-site Survey:X X X X X X X X XRP#13 Personnel Monitoring:

N/A_4 Job Coverage:

N/A.50Offsite RadAssessment:

Tabie 56 Other site specificRP (describe):

N/A7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

_N/A_8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

N/A___*Performance times are estimated Notes: RP Survey RX bldg. around scram valves (6.2-064) then performs onsite surveysChemistry secure oxygen injection as directed by SMPNPS Page 37PNPSPage 37 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNPS TABLEIF 5-TEMERGNCY PANAMLYSISREPORT I a;I~ plI QLine#iucto

.......OnShif PostionTask AnalysEmergency PlanningDeclare the emergency classification level Shift Manager Training Program / EP(ECL) Drills2 pprove Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Eraining ProgamnnI Emergency Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose IN/ArangPorm Licensed Operator TrainingNotification and direction to on-shift staff Shift Manager Program /Emergency

,(e.g., to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) Planning Training Program6 IEO ntifcaton SiftMangerEmergency Planning6 ER notficaionShif Mangerraining ProgramLicensed Operator Training7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event NI/APrgaEmrogenya lnnn8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Eeraining Progamnn9 P)erform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emergency Planning_____________________________

________________

Training Program" Licensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 EDS NO#2Emergency Planning11 ctvateERDS LO#Training ProgramTechncian Emergency Planning12 Offsite radiological assessment Chemistryi Tcnia Training Program13 Prfom NR noifiatios NO#2Emergency Planning13 Prfom NR noifiatios NO#Training Program14 Perform other site-specific event notifications Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training(e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) ___________Program 15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 38PNPSPage 38 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTE. Design Basis Accident Analysis

1. 6 -Fuel Handling Accident1. Accident Summary* The fuel handling accident is assumed to occur as a consequence of afailure of the fuel assembly lifting mechanism, resulting in the dropping ofa raised fuel assembly onto the core. The drop causes mechanical damage to the bundle being dropped.* The drywell and reactor building are open with ventilation running.

Allreleases to the environment are through the reactor building ventilation.

• The drop of a fuel bundle in containment over the reactor pressurevessel bounds a drop of a fuel bundle in the fuel building due to thegreater drop height.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* Onsite personnel will be in accordance with the refuel outage staffingplan that includes additional SROs, ROs, NLOs, RP Techs, andMaintenance.

3. Procedures for Accident Response* EOP-5, Radioactive Release Control* 5.4.3, Refueling Floor High Radiation PNPS Page 39PNPSPage 39 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesAPPENDX B! TABL I N-SHIFT POSITIONS; inel Au m naio... ... ....Ro....l in.. Unana..yzed TMSIIT2/L1T5/L1T5/L3Emergency Plan 60T5/L5 No YesI Shift Manager Table B-i16 T5/L6T51L8T5/L1 0____ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ T5/L 142 Control Room Supervisor Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No NoTable B-iShift Technical EegnyPa3 Advisor/Shift Engineer Table B-i2/ / / /___(3rd SRO)__ ______4Licensed Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A T21L4 No NoOperator (RO #1) Table B-i1_________

_____Licensed Nuclear Plant Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo Operator (RO #2) Table B-i1____

______ _____6Non-Licensed Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A T21L6 No NoPlant Operator (NLO #1) Table B-i______

__________

_____T5/L97Non-Licensed Nuclear Emergency Plan 60 T5/L11I No NoPlant Operator (NLO #2) 'able B-i T5/L1 3_____ ____8 Nlon-Licensed Nuclear iEmergency Plan N/A N/A No NoPlant Operator (NLO #3) Fable B-i1________

____ ___________

Non-Licensed Nuclear Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoPl:)ant Operator (NLO #4) B-i1________

___________

10 Non-Licensed Nuclear IEmergency Plan N/A N/A No NoPlant Operator (NLO #5) rable B-i1________

____ ___________

11 Fire Brigade #1 Emergenc Plan N/A N/A No No12Fr rgd 2Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No__2 __ire _Brigade_#2_Table B-i1________

_ _ _ _ ______ _____13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 T5/L12 No NoTechnician Iable B-i_________

_____ ___ ____ _____14 RPTechnician Emergenfcy Plan 60 T4/L3 No Noable B-i1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Security15 Security Contingency Plan / 60 T5/L1 5 No No_________________E-Plan Table B-I_______

_____PNPS Page 40PNPSPage 40 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNS.A.E2-PLN OPERATION

& SAF SHU.TDOWN " .........

.. ...I J.. ........

.. ...................

........I LO neI ...UItI -l O n e.. n tro R o o m. ..... ....I ...... .... ...I [. .:::: ::,,:...

...

1. 8 -F elH nd ig.c id nLine # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position task Analysis_________________________________________

ontrolling MethodLicensed OperatorI Shift Manager Shift Manager Training Program2 Unt Speriso CotrolRoo SuervsorLicensed Operator___ nit Supervisor______ontrol__Roo__

Supervisor_____

Training Program3 Licensed OperatorShift Technical Advisor ]Shift Engineer/STA Training Program4 Ractr Oeraor 1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator4 RatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Training Program.5 Leco prtr# icensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#2Operator

1. 2 Training Program6 ,uxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator_____ _______________________Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 ,uxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other' needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis________________________

_______________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 l&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 41PNPSPage 41 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade:i:~~~~PNPS

,TABLE :3'-:FIREFIGHTING::I,

.:,I N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A-5 N/A N/ANote: FHA does not include a fire.PNPS Page 42PNPSPage 42 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTN ; 5 30-: 35 45- 50-" 55-' 60 :70 80- I In-Plant Survey:N/A___2 On-site Survey:N/A3 Personnel Monitoring:

RP#1X X X X XT Job Coverage:

N/A50Offsite RadAssessment:

(Included in Table6 IOther site specific RP(,describe):N/A

.7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

N/A8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

N/A _*Times are estimated Note: RP#1 assist in monitoring and decon Of building evacuees at the Green Line.Additional RP on shift for refueling/outage to assist with tasksPNPSPage 43

.PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTi =iio: PN=: PS TABLE EMERGENCY IM PLEM ENTATION~i:; iLieFuncto I Tsk*I On-Shift Positio 1 Declare the emergency classification level ShftMaagrraining ProgamnniEP (ECL) Drills2 ,pprove Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program3 &pprove content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning4 &pprove extension to allowable dose N/A Emraining ProgamnnLcneOprtrTrainingPrga Notification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g., ShitcanaerProra OpEergerrancy gt o assemble,

evacuate, etc.) SitMngrPlanigTra inin Pmrogramy EegnyPlanning Tann rga6 ERO notification Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training7 /bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/APrgaEmrogenya lnnn8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 raningProgram 11 Planning12 Offsite radiological assessment Chemistry Tcnia Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NLO#2 Emraining Progamnn14Perform other site-specific event notifications SitMngrLicensed Operator Training(e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) rga15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 44PNPSPage 44 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTF. Accident Analysis

1. 8 -Aircraft Probable Threat1. Accident Summary* The analysis includes all emergency response actions taken prior to anaircraft impact in accordance with RG 1.214 for an aircraft threat that isgreater than 5 minutes, but less than 30 minutes from the site, andconsiders the dispersal of the site fire brigade away from target areas forfirefighting.

• The analysis does not include a scenario or response actions takenduring or after a crash.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* The Shift Manager receives the call from the NRC of probable aircraftthreat.* All non-security on-shift personnel are inside the protected area fence attheir normal workstation.

3. Procedures for Accident Response* 5.3.1 4.1, Airborne ThreatPNP Pae 4PNPSPage 45 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. Tables i ,:-________Aayi

_________

,.

; : :: ::: A ugme:ntation Role :in Table # !

i TMS Required?

Line # On-shift Position E-Plan Reference

Time I

:Line #:I T :;:ask? ' :,, T2/L1T5/LIT5/L31Shift Manager Emergency Plan 60 T15No YesTable B-I T5/L6T5/L8._ T5/L1 0________________

T5/L14 _ _ _ _ _ _2 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No No__ _Supervisor Table B-i _______ _______ ______Shift Technical EegnyPa3 Advisor/Shift Emrec ln60 T2/L3 No No___Engineer (3rd SRO) TaleB-Licensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L4 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B-I/AT2L No NoLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L5 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B-i /AT2 No No#___ 2) _________

Non-Licensed EegnyPa oN6 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 2L oN___Operator (NLO #1) al -/ 2LNon-Licensed T5/L97 lant Emergency Plan60T/1Noo 7 Nucler Plant Table B-i10T/I oN___)perator (NLO #2) ________T5/L1 3 _____ _____Non-Licensed EegnyPa / 3L oN8 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 3L oN___Operator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa / 3L oN9 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 3L oN___Operator (NLO #4) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa10 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 3L oNOperator (NLO #5 al -/ 3L oN11Fr rgd 1 Emergency Plan N/A T3/L4 No No11 _FireBrigade#1 Table B-i1______

______12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A T3/L5 "No NoT________

able B-i _______ _ __ _ _ _13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 N/A No NoTechnician Table B-i1______

14 RPehiin Emergency Plan 60 T4/L6 No NoRP Technician able B-I1______

______Security Contingency 15 Security Plan / E-Plan Table 60 N/A No No____ _______________

EB-I__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _PNPS Page 46PNPSPage 46 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLine # Generic TitlelRole

'On-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ _________________________

________________Controlling Method1 Ishift Manager Ishift Manager Licensed Operator______ __________________________

________________Training Program2 Jnit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Lricnsed OPeraogra 3 hitTechnical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Licensed OperatorShiftTraining Program4 Ractr pertor#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator4 ecorOeatr#

perator #1 Training Program5 Reactor Operator

1. 2 Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator____uiiayOeao Operator

1. 2 Nuler raining Program6 uxliryOpraor#1Non-licensed Ncer Non-Licensed OperatorP~lant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis____ _ _ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A NI/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 I&C Technician N/A N,/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A Nl/APNPS Page 47PNPSPage 47 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigadei!

PN

, :ii!':ii:

B LEicr f:: :: 3 -..... rob beEFaIG HT........

.IN G: ....:i == : ,.' :=' :,;: :...:::::..

',: ' ..1 NLO #3 Fire Brigade Training2 NLO #4 Fire Brigade Training3 NLO #5 Fire Brigade Training4 FB #1 Fire Brigade Training5 FB #2 Fire Brigade TrainingNote: FB goes to hardened facility outside the reactor building after performing tasks directed by theCRS.PNPS Page 48PNPSPage 48 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTLv PoitonPefomance Time Period After. Emergency Declarato (mnte)I In-Plant Survey:2 On-site Survey:3 Personnel Monitoring:

____T Job Coverage:

5 Offsite RadAssessment:

(Included inTable 56Other site specificRP#1 goes tooutside PATChemistry Function task #1(,describe) 8Chemistry Function task #2(describe)

Note: RP relocates to outside the protected area but stays on PNPS property and Chemistry evacuates the process building and takes cover in a secure area.PNPS Page 49PNPSPage 49 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT'I!"i;:~PN PS TABLE 5- E MERGENCY PLAN IMPLEM ENTATION!

i !,.: =.' :;Function.ITask*

Position:

! l i"Task

" " ....

Co tr lln M ethodEmergency PlanningDeclare the emergency classification level SitMngrriigPormIE (ECL)Drills 2 Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program] Emergency Planning3 &pprove content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training Program4 &prov exenson o alowale oseN/AEmergency Planning4 ppove xtesionto llowbledoseN/Araining ProgramLicensed Operator Training5 Notification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g., Shift Manager Program I Emergency to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) Planning Training Program6 ER notficaionShif MangerEmergency Planning6 ER notficaionShif Mangerraining ProgramLicensed Operator Training7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/APrgaEmergency Planning8 Complete State/local notification form Shift ManagerrangPorm Emrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Eraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civae EDS NO#2raiingProgram ChemistryteTechnician#2Emergency Planning12 Ofsie raiolgicl asessentraining ProgramEmergency Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NILO#2 Emraining ProgamnnPerform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator Training14 Shift ManagerPrga (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etC.) Program_____

____________

15 Personnel Accountability N/A Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 50PNPSPage 50 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTG. Accident Analysis

1. 9 -Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown1. Accident Summary* Fire in the Main Control occurs that requires control room evacuation.

• Station personnel evacuate the control room taking time only for thoseimmediate actions within the control room that can be accomplished inseconds.

Station personnel take all subsequent action required to bringthe reactor to a cold shutdown condition using controls and equipment located outside the control room.2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* The ATC operator will perform the immediate actions of the procedure toinitiate a manual scram and verify all rods in before evacuating thecontrol room.* Subsequent actions are performed from outside the control room.3. N Procedures for Accident Response* 2.4.143, Shutdown From Outside the Main Control Room* EP-IP-1 00, Classification and .Notifications

• EP-IP-1 00.1, EALsPNPS Page 51PNPSPage 51 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. TablesILine # On-shift Reference Elapsed Yim+e!.

1. i Task?,:;::

T2/LIT5/LlT5/L31 Shift Manager Emergency Plan 60T5/L5 N eTable B-I 6 T5/L6 N eT5/L8T5/LI10________________

~~~T5/L 14 __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _2Control Room Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo Supervisor Table B-i / 2L oNShift Technical EegnyPa3 Advisor/Shift EegnyPa___Tnier(r R) able B-i 60 T2/L3 No NoLicensed Nuclear4 Plant Operator (RO Emrec lnNAT/4No No#1 ) able B-iLicensed Nuclear5 Plant Operator (RO Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo Table B-1i/ 2L oNNon-Licensed 6 Nuclear Plant Emergency PlanN/T26Noo

___Operator (NLO #1) al -Non-Licensed T51L97 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan60T/iNoo Table B-i 0T/1 oNOperator (NLO #2) _______T5/L13______

Non-Licensed 8 Nuclear Plant Emergency PlanN/T3LNoo Operator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed 9 Nuclear Plant Emergency PlanN/T32Noo

___Operator (NLO #/4) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa10 Nuclear Plant NoegecNola

___Operator (NLO #5) al -/ 3L11 Fire Brigade #1 Emergency PlanNAT34Noo T_________

able B-i N__AT3/L4

_ No______

No_____12 Fire Brigade #2 Emergency Plan N/A T3/L5 No No_____ _____ ___ Table B-I1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______13 RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 6 / oNTechnician Table B-i 60______

N/A_____

No____No

_14 RP Technician Emergenc Plan 60 T4/L4 No NoSecurity15 Security Contingency Plan/I 60 N/A No No______________E-Plan Table B-1 _______ ______ ______ ______PNPSPage 52 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT*PNPS TABLE 2 _-: PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN

, i:: : :i illAnalysis

1. 9- CR,,Evacuation

&Alternate Minimu'm Operations Crew Necessary to Im plemnent AOPs :an~d EOs o=r =SAMGs !if Applicable

,= Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_________________________Controlling MethodLicensed Operator1 Shift Manager Shift Manager Training ProgramSuperisorLicensed Operator2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Sprio Training ProgramShift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Lricnsed OPeraogra 4 Ractr pertor#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator4 eco peao 1Operator

1. 1 Training Program5 Ractr pertor#2Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator5 eco peao 2Operator

1. 2 Training Program6 Auxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator_______________________Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role IOn-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ __________________________Controlling Method11 Mechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 I&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 53PNPSPage 53 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade: .. ..i: :': : ::.... ...i : : : P : NPS TABLE .. .. ...C ~~3:- FIREFIGHTIT NG : at n it r te$ " ' : ::o. :., ::L .. ...ne ..... Per......

fo iirmed llllil by ' i Taski A ay is Co toln Method1 NLO#3 Fire Brigade Training2 NO4Fire Brigade Training5 FB2Fire Brigade TrainingPNPS Page 54PNPSPage 54 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT:: .....PNPS.TABLE 4- RADIATION PROTECTION ANDi CHEMISTRY/,,:,=

.. ,:=,=..... Analysis

1. 9 CR Evacuation

& Alternate E 0-5atigfas:i:

2.:: 10- :i 1'5- 20-.125. 35 '45- 50-~ 55 i65- 70-1"75-180- ______.___

"., 101::f5.20.'25;-30=:

35: '40 4:5: :50: 55 :601 6570 ,o:75'80 o/85,:90:

1 In-Plant Survey:2 On-site Survey:3 Personnel Monitoring:

___4 Job Coverage:

RP#lSupport X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XFB50Offsite RadAssessment:

(Included inTable 56 Other site specificRP (describe):

7 Chemistry Function task #1(describe) 8 Chemistry-Function task #2(describe)

PNPSPage 55 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT! ":PN PS 5- ERGEN CYi PLEAN I1M PLEM ENTATI O i,Declre he mergncyclasifiatin lvelEmergency PlanningDECLar)h mrec lasfcto ee Shift Manager Training Program i EP(ECL)Drills

,pprove Offsite Protective Action Emergency Planning2 Recommendations N/A Training Program3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A Emraining ProgamnnNotiicaionand iretio to n-siftstaf.(eg.,Licensed Operator TrainingNoiia5naddrcin oo-hf tf egShift Manager Program / Emergency to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) Planning Training ProgramEmergency Planning6 ERO notification Shift ManagerrangPorm Licensed Operator Training7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/APrga8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Emraining Progamnn9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emergency PlanningLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civae EDS NO#2raiingProgram 11 Ativae EDS NO#2Emergency Planning12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NLO#2 Emraining Progamnn14Perform other site-specific event notifications SitMngrLicensed Operator Training(e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) _______rogram____________

15 Personnel Accountability N/A Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 56PNPSPage 56 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTH. Accident Analysis

1. 10 -Station Blackout1. Accident Summary* At power, normal lineups and no additionai events* RCIC starts to restore level and SRVs lift in the relief mode to controlpressure2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* Assume the Shift Manager recognizes power cannot be restored within15 minutes after the loss before the 15 minute SBO EAL period hasexpired.3. Procedures for Accident Response* 5.3.31, Station Blackout* EP-IP-1 00, Classification and Notifications

• EP-IP-1 00.1, EALs* EP-IP-410, Evacuation and AssemblyPNPS Page 57PNPSPage 57 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. Tablesi

,: PN PS:; :)i E ON DS I :

i:; ':-___________

Anaysis#10 Staton BackoT2/L1___

T5/L5T5/L8T5/L31T5/L142 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No NoSupervisor Table B-I3AvsrShiftTehia Emergency Plan 60 T2/L3 No, NoEngineer (3rd SRO) Table B-IiLcensed Nuclear4 Plant Operator (RO Emergency Plan N/A T2/L4 No No-~Table B-iLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa5 Plant Operator (RO ablrenc B-i n N/A T2/L5 No NoNon-Licensed EegnyPa /6 Nluclear Plant Emrec lnNAT2/L6 No NoOperator (NLO #1) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa60T5/L9 7 Nuclear Plant -EegnyPa60T5/LI I No NoTable B-IOperator (NLO #2) T5/L13_____

Non-Licensed EegnyPa / / oN8 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / / oNOperator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed EegnyPa / oN9 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / / oNOperator (NLO #4) al -/Non-Licensed 10 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No NoOperator (NLO #5) al -11Fr rgd 1 Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No12 Fire Brigade #2 ,Emergency PlanN/NANoo

_______ _____ Table B-I1/ / oN13RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 60 N/A No No13 Technician Fable B-I1________

____ _____14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60 N/A No No_____________

TableB-I1_____________

Security15 Security Contingency Plan / 60 T5/L15 No No______________E-Plan Table B-i1 ________

_____ ______ _____PNPSPage 58 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNPS TABLE 2 ~- PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAPE SHUTPOWNOne Unit -One Control RoomAnalysis

1. 10 -Station Blackout.

Mnim~um Oper#ations Cirew N e essary: to Imple6m ent: AO Ps .and EOPs or .SA Ms Iif

i;Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis________________Controlling Method1 Shft anaer SiftMangerLicensed OperatorI Shft Mnage Shit Maagerraining Program2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Licensed OperatorTraining ProgramLicensed Operator3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Training Program4 Ractr pertor#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator4 RatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Program,5 RatrOperator

1. 2 Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOperator

1. 2 Training Program6 Auxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Nuclear Non-Licensed Operator_____ _______________________Plant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 Auxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ _______________

ontrolling Method1 1 Mechanic N/A N/A1 2 Electrician N/A N/A1 3 l&C Technician N/A N/A1 4 Other N/A N/A1 5 Other N/A N/APNPS Page 59PNPSPage 59 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade TABLE

L:f¸ilG 1 N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A5 N/A N/ANote: The Station Blackout Analysis does not include the need for firefighting.

PNPS Page 60PNPSPage 60 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTE -, :10 ,:15i i25 30: 35!: 40 4:5 150' :55; 75 80 :85': 90,-1 In-Plant Survey:N/A2 On-site Survey:N/A3 Personnel Monitoring:

_N/AT Job Coverage:

N/A__50Offsite RadAssessment:

._Included inTable 56 Other site specificRP (describe):

N/A7 Chemistry----------------------------

---

Function task #1(describe)

N/A___8 Chemistry Function task #2(describe)

N/A__Note: RP and Chemistry do not have an assigned task for SBO. Chemistry is available for doseassessment if a release occurs.PNPSPage 61 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTDeclre te emrgeny ca nsfialyisn

1. 10e EmStationBlackout Delr1h megnycasfiainlvl Shift Manager Training Program I EP(ECL) D:rills2 pprove Offsite Protective Action NAEmergency Planning2 Recommendations N/Araining Program3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmergencyg Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A Emraining ProgamnnLricnsed OPeraorgra innNotification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g., ShitcanaerProra

/OEergerrancy g5 to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) SitMngrPlanigTra inin Pmrogramy EegnyPlanning Tann rga6 ERO notification Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/APrgaEmrogenya lnnn8 Complete State/local notification form Shift Manager Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civae EDS NO#2raiingProgram 11 EDS kLO#2Emergency Planning12 Offsite radiological assessment Nl/A Emraining ProgamnnEmrgencyg Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NiLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnPerform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator Training(4re.g.,

Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) __hift ____Manager_____Program___

15 Personnel Accountability Security Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 62PNPSPage 62 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTAccident Analysis

1. 11 -LOCA/General Emergency with Release and PAR1. Accident Summary (Assumed for Staffing Analysis Purpose)* The unit is in a Site Area Emergency ASI when the Shift Manager isgiven a dose assessment update that projects

>1 Rem TEDE dose at thesite boundary.

2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made* All actions for SAE are complete.

• No transients other than LOCA are considered.

• The ERO would be activated at an Alert or SAE. For Staffing Analysispurpose, the T=0 clock is used for the emergency plan actions toevaluate the capability to implement the GE classification, PAR andnotification functions before the ERO arrives.3. Procedures for Accident Response* EP-IP-1 00, Emergency Classification and Notification

• EP-IP-1 00.1, Emergency Action Levels* EP-IP-300, Offsite Radiological Dose Assessment

• EOP-05, Radiological Release* EOP-01, RPV Control* EOP-03, Primary Containment Control* EOP-04, Secondary Containment Control* EP-IP-400, PARPNPS Page 63PNPSPage 63 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT4. Tables::' : * !:

!I P EN I B !: : :: : APPENDIX

Role inTable #

TMS Req'uired?

T2/L1T5/L1T5/L2T5/L31 Shift Manager Emergency Plan 60 T5/L4 No NoFable B-i T5/L5T5/L8T5/LI10____ ____ ____ __ _ ____ ____ ___ ____ ____ ___ T5/L14 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _2 Control Room Emergency Plan N/A T2/L2 No No____Supervisor Fable B-I1______

______Shift Technical EegnyPa oN3 Advisor/Shift EerecPan6T2LNoo

___Eng]ineer (3rd SRO) 'able B-i10T2LLicensed Nuclear EegnyPa / 2L4 Plant Operator (RO Emrec lnNAT/4No No_____ 1)able B-ILicensed Nuclear5 Plant Operator (RO Emergency PlanN/T2LNoo T__ )able B-I / 2L oNNon-Licensed EegnyPa / 2L oN6 Nuclear Plant EegnyPa / 2L oN___Operator (NLO #1) al -Non-Licensed

-mrec lnT5/L97 EmergencyPPlan 60 T5/L1 1 No NoNuclear Plantable B-i15L3 _______ _________Operator (NLO #2) TS/L13_________________

Non-Licensed 8 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No___Operator (NLO #3) al -Non-Licensed 9 Nuclear Plant Emergency Plan N/A N/A No No'O p e ra to r (N L O # 4 ) _ __ab le_ _ _ _ _ __B-1_ _ _Non-Licensed EegnyPa10 Nuclear Plant Emrec lnNANANo No___Operator (NLO #5) ___able_

_ __ _ __ __ _ ___-1_ __ _Emergency PlanN/NANoo 11 Fire Brigade #1 Nobl No" ~~~Emergency PlanNAN/Noo 12 Fire Brigade #2 Nobl No13RP / Chemistry Emergency Plan 6T5L2No No13 rechnician Table B-i1______

______ ______14 RP Technician Emergency Plan 60T4/L2Noo

___able____

B-1_____

________

T4/L6Noo15 Security Contingency Plan / 60 N/A No No______________E-Plan Table B-i1 _______PNPS Page 64PNPSPage 64 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORT: ......

PNPS.- T.ABLE 2- IPL'ANT OPERATIONS SAFE SHUTDOWN:i ":: :*i : ,M.nim m .Opeation Crew. Ne.essar to....mpl........e.....

..A.. ..... a ....d EO " ...r ......fA plcal.. .. ....ILine # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ ________________________________________Controlling Method1 Shft anaer SiftMangerLicensed Operator1__ iftMange Shift_______________

Manager_______Training Program2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Lricnsed OPeraogra 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Engineer/STA Lricnsed OPeraogra 4 RatrOeao#1Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed OperatorRatrOeao#1Operator

1. 1 Training Program5 Reactor Operator

1. 2 Licensed Nuclear Plant Licensed Operator______________________Operator

1. 2 Nuler raining Program6 &uxiliary Operator

1. 1 Non-licensed Ncer Non-Licensed OperatorPlant Operator

1. 1 Training Program7 &uxiliary Operator

1. 2 N/A N/A8 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/AOther (non-Operations)

Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Line # Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Task Analysis_____ _______________Controlling Method11 IMechanic N/A N/A12 Electrician N/A N/A13 l&C Technician N/A N/A14 Other N/A N/A15 O:ther N/A N/APNPS Page 65PNPSPage 65 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTFire Brigade..........

'" ...... ... "..... "' ... PN , 3 -. F REFIGHTiNG.':::

1 N/A N/A2 N/A N/A3 N/A N/A4 N/A N/A5 N/A N/ANote: The LOCA/GE with PAR Analysis does not include the need for firefighting.

PNPS Page 66PNPSPage 66 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPNP TBLE4-RADIATION PROTECTION AND'CHEI'ASTRY,

':I In-Plant Survey:N/A___2 On-site Survey:RP#1 onsite & XX XX XX XX X__SB surveys3 'Personnel Monitoring:

N/AT Job Coverage:

_N/A5 Offsite RadSsessment:

Se._eTble 56 Other site specific RP(describe):

RP#1 Issue X X X X XKI7 Chemistry Functiontask #1 (describe)

N/A8 Chemistry Functiontask #2 (describe)

N/A*Times are estimated.

Note: RP tasks are as directed by the Shift Manager and are not time critical.

Chemistry does not have an assigned chemistry task for LOCA with PAR. Chemistry is available for dose assessment.

PNPS Page 67PNPSPage 67 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTL ine

On-Shift

ii'!:Task Analysis'

,Emergency Planning1 Declare the emergency classification level Shift Manager Training Program / EP(ECL) Drills2 ,pprove Ofisite Protective Action SitMngrEmergency Planning2 Recommendations ShfTangrraining ProgramEmergency Planning3 Approve content of State/local notifications Shift Manager Training ProgramEmergency Planning4 Approve extension to allowable dose Shift ManagerrangPorm Licensed Operator Training5 Notification and direction to on-shift staff (e.g., Shift Manager Program / Emergency to assemble,

evacuate, etc.) Planning Training Program6 ER notfictionN/AEmergency Planning6 ER notfictionN/Araining Program7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A Lcne prtrTannProgramEmergency Planning8 Complete State/local notification form Shift ManagerrangPorm Emrgencyg Planning9 Perform State/local notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnLicensed Operator Training10 Complete NRC event notification form Shift ManagerPrga 11 civae ERS NO#2 ainng rogramChemAcstrytTechnician#2Emergency Planning12 Ofsie raiolgicl asessentraining Program12 Ofsie rdiolgicl asessentCheistr Tehniian Emergency Planning13 Perform NRC notifications NLO#2 Emraining ProgamnnPerform other site-specific event notifications Licensed Operator Training14 (,e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Shift Manager Program15 Personnel Accountability N/A Security Training ProgramPNPS Page 68PNPSPage 68 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTVIII, APPENDIX C TIME MOTIONS STUDIESA. TMS Shift Manager Safe Shutdown TaskPILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATIONTIME MOTION STUDY OF OVERLAPPING TASKSTASK 1: PERFORM THE ASSIGNED SAFE SHUTDOWN ACTIONSJOB: SHIFT MANAGERTASK 2: PERFORM EMERGENCY DIRECTION AND CONTROLJOB: SHIFT MANAGERPNPS Page 69PNPSPage 69 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTPURPOSE:Perform a Time Motion Study to evaluate whether the performance of safe shutdown actionsassigned to the Shift Manager is an acceptable task overlap to the Shift Manager's primaryemergency plan function of emergency direction and control.NOTEThe Time Motion Study should be completed by simulation ofperforming the safe shutdown steps while the Shift Manager isdemonstrating the Emergency Director function.

LOCATION:

Control Room to TB 23' RPS MG room to 23' Cable Spreading Room to TSCREQUIRED TOOLS/EQUIPMENT:

A. Procedure 2.4.143, Shutdown from Outside Control RoomB. Stopwatch or watch to time actionsPNPS Page 70PNPSPage 70 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTAPPENDIX D (NEI 10-05)Function I Responsibility (Task) Analysis TemplateEvent: #9 Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown Site: PNPSPosition:

Shift Mana~qer Line #: 1Function jResponsibility (Task) Action Step ]Duration 1 .SafeShutdown1.1 Perform the procedure steps assigned the ShiftManager in procedure 2.4.143 Rev 48, Shutdownfrom Outside the ControlRoom.T=0SM leaves the CR and directs hisstaff to implement assignedshutdown tasks[step 16(a), (b)] SM arrives at 1 minutepower supply panel C511I (TB 23' (T=+I)RPS MG Room) and* Opens Reactor Protection System (RPS) logicChannel A, breaker A3* Opens RPS Channel B,breaker B3* Closes RPS Channel A,breaker A3* Closes RPS Channel B,breaker B3+2 -SM leaves 23' RPS MG 1 minuteRoom and obtains fuse pullers (T=+2)and safety equipment from the 23'Switchgear Room-SM leaves 23' Switchgear Room 1 minute________________________

(T=+3)[Step 16(d)] T+3 -SM arrives at23' Cable Spreading Room.Opens panels C941 and C942* Removes fuse 1 6A-F10OA* Removes fuse 16A-F11A* Removes fuse 1 6A-FI12A* Removes fuse 16A-F10B* Removes fuse 16A-F11B* Removes fuse 1 6A-F1 2BSM verbalizes all fuses removed,reactor scrammed and MSIV'sclosed[step 16(g)] SM arrives and gainsaccess to the TSC. SM confirmsstatus of HCU scram valveposition from field reports or EPIC.TASK : :,, :,1 minute(T=+4)PNPS Page 71PNPSPage 71 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTTOTAL TASK DURATION:

6 minutesFunction Responsibility (Task) Action Step Duration2.Emergency 2.1 Maintain emergency 1 The ShiftDirection and direction and control of the Oversight of the emergency ManagerControl event response.

response.

maintains radio2 contact with crewInitiate any emergency

actions, for updates andNOTE directions The TMS is for the overlap period.The total time considered for thistask should be concurrent withTask 1.....D..FEMERGENCY

.......

TASK DURATION 6 MiueRESULT:Explain why it is acceptable or not acceptable for the Shift Manager to perform the safe shutdowntasks:The procedure Subsequent Action step 13(a) states that the performance of the procedure is an Alertclassification and to activate the ERO per EP-IP-100 from the TSC. In step 13(e), the Shift Manager isassigned the tasks to initiate scram, EAL notifications, MSIV closure, and verify scram valve positions.

The Shift Manager passes the RPS panels to initiate the scram and close MSIVs when traveling to theTSC from the control room. The Shift Manager performs steps 16(a), 16(c), 16(d), and 16(g) which takeapproximately 6 minutes.

Verification of control rod position may be verified from the TSC using EPIC.The performance of the SSD steps does not delay the classification of the emergency and the ShiftManager is able to maintain emergency direction and control by communicating with the crew by radiowhile they are aligning the alternate shutdown panels. Therefore, performing the safe shutdown steps isan acceptable overlapping task.Task Performer Richard Probasco Shift Manager August 23, 2012Evaluators Stephen Reid Operations Training August 23, 2012Fred Guynn Fleet EP Project August 23, 2012S______________________

Manager ___________

SThomas Diorio Pilgrim I&C (EP) August 23, 2012PNPS Page 72PNPSPage 72 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTIX. OVERLAP OF TASKS ACTIVITIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS IDENTIFIED A. Overlap Requiring Compensatory Measures1. The Shift Engineer

/ STA has a collateral duty to fill out the notification messageforms and to make all notifications which may detract the STA from theperformance of his/her primary STA function.

It is acceptable for the STA tomake the abbreviated NRC notification in a Design Basis Threat but may notmaintain the open line with the NRC.2. The Shift Engineer has a collateral task to perform safe shutdown actions whichmay detract from the capability to perform the primary STA function.

3. The Shift Engineer has a collateral task to perform dose assessment which maydetract from the capability to perform the primary STA function.

PNPS Page 73PNPSPage 73 PNPS ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS REPORTX. " REFERENCES

• NEI 10-05, Rev 0, Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffingand Capabilities

• NSIR DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance

-Emergency Planning for Nuclear PowerPlants* PNPS Emergency Plan, Rev 39XI. STAFFING ANALYIS TEAM* Fred Guynn, Entergy ECH Sr Project Manager, EP* Myra Jones, CMCG Contractor

• Tom White, PNPS Manager -EP* Mike McDonnell, PNPS AOM, Operations Support* Barbara Nadeau, PNPS Radiation Protection

• Kenneth Sejkora, PNPS Chemistry

• Ashley Ohrenberger, PNPS Ops Training* Karen Sullivan, PNPS EP Planner* Robert Emmitt, PNPS ERO TrainingPNPS Page 74PNPSPage 74