ML17194A850: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material | | document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
}} | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201Examination Outline Quality ChecklistFacility: Fermi 2Date of Examination: 312012017ItemTask Descriptionlnitialsab*c#1.RITTENa.Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES'401N'Nç+9Wb. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared n accordance withSection D.'1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all llA categories are appropriately sampled.n4pv{d,c. Assess whether the outlineevolutionsor.\{toüqtd. Assesswhetherthens for deselected orK/A statements areriate,nút,f,ltw2.sIMULAToRa.Usng Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ofnorml evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and majortransients@ûqøb.Assesswhetherthereareenoughscenariosets(andspares)totesttheprojectednumberandmtxofapplicantsnaccordancewiththeexpectedcrewcompositionndrotationschedulewthoutcompromising exam isignificantlyntegrltyandenSUrethateachapplicantcanbetestedusingatleastonenewormodifiedscenano,thatnoscenanosareduplicatedfromtheaudit test(s), and that scenarios will not beonn*çf$.tbc. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative andquantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described inDte'{fnh3,WALKTHRoUGHVerify that the systems walk{hrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301'2:(t ) ifre outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributedamong the safety functions as specified on the form(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within ihe limits specified on the form(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) )(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form(Sl the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria onthe form.s\*\tfr4b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the crteria specifed on Form ES-30'1-'1(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specifed on the format least one task is new or significano more than one task is repeatedntly modifiedfrom the last two NRC licensing examinationsS\P{$\opc. Determine if there are enough different outlnes to test the projected number and mix ofand ensure that no items are duonsnt${ll\ctf)4.(tENERALa. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in theriate exam sections.rPút$@b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45tstP'$rD$\@c. Ensure that KAratinforat least 2.5.$\D0J!?$f\qd. Check for duplication andexam sectionsn,taú>$.qf'e. Check the entire exam for balance of covens^ûtnøf. Assess whether the exam fits the alevelorngncdbPrintedreDateill sltL,, I t/ry.tU t //b?/e/r¿a. Authorb. Facility Reviewer (-)c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)d. NRC SupervisorR0Note:# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.* tÅ):ff r*rrie, c.*¿;+ tect ahen quai (c\blt 'nçq | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 20:15, 26 April 2018
| ML17194A850 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 04/03/2017 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Detroit Edison, Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17061A779 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML17194A850 (1) | |
Text
ES-201Examination Outline Quality ChecklistFacility: Fermi 2Date of Examination: 312012017ItemTask Descriptionlnitialsab*c#1.RITTENa.Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES'401N'Nç+9Wb. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared n accordance withSection D.'1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all llA categories are appropriately sampled.n4pv{d,c. Assess whether the outlineevolutionsor.\{toüqtd. Assesswhetherthens for deselected orK/A statements areriate,nút,f,ltw2.sIMULAToRa.Usng Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ofnorml evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and majortransients@ûqøb.Assesswhetherthereareenoughscenariosets(andspares)totesttheprojectednumberandmtxofapplicantsnaccordancewiththeexpectedcrewcompositionndrotationschedulewthoutcompromising exam isignificantlyntegrltyandenSUrethateachapplicantcanbetestedusingatleastonenewormodifiedscenano,thatnoscenanosareduplicatedfromtheaudit test(s), and that scenarios will not beonn*çf$.tbc. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative andquantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described inDte'{fnh3,WALKTHRoUGHVerify that the systems walk{hrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301'2:(t ) ifre outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributedamong the safety functions as specified on the form(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within ihe limits specified on the form(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) )(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form(Sl the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria onthe form.s\*\tfr4b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the crteria specifed on Form ES-30'1-'1(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specifed on the format least one task is new or significano more than one task is repeatedntly modifiedfrom the last two NRC licensing examinationsS\P{$\opc. Determine if there are enough different outlnes to test the projected number and mix ofand ensure that no items are duonsnt${ll\ctf)4.(tENERALa. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in theriate exam sections.rPút$@b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45tstP'$rD$\@c. Ensure that KAratinforat least 2.5.$\D0J!?$f\qd. Check for duplication andexam sectionsn,taú>$.qf'e. Check the entire exam for balance of covens^ûtnøf. Assess whether the exam fits the alevelorngncdbPrintedreDateill sltL,, I t/ry.tU t //b?/e/r¿a. Authorb. Facility Reviewer (-)c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)d. NRC SupervisorR0Note:# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.* tÅ):ff r*rrie, c.*¿;+ tect ahen quai (c\blt 'nçq