ML18032A192: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/8/18 4:51 PM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pe-hj8w Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0044 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Name: Frances Howard Address: Submitter Information 4346 Campus Ave Unit 202 San Diego, CA, 92103-2456 Email: fjhoward@att.net @ i;. p~ 52 7t/C( ll/15/~017 -"*-------.. -**-----*------**-**-----------------------*-----*-*-**-*-***--*-* ---*--------~----*-***-----------_________ ,, ____ ****----~----*-------*-------*---**-**----*--------**--------------***-*--*--*-------_______ .) General Comment Please consider the possibility of oceanic problems ( especially Tsunami's , erosion, etc.,) These time bombs (the nuclear wastes) should be in a much more secluded and weather/water proof space, not subject to such _ powerful sources of danger and erosion. These discards should be much further from human populations. Thank you for your studied attention to this formidable problem. SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= -J ~r.a~5!11,J)f// lJct15J https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectid=0900006482d90287&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018 
}}

Revision as of 02:40, 21 April 2018

Comment (43) of Frances Howard Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18032A192
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/2018
From: Howard F
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00043, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18032A192 (1)


Text

As of: 1/8/18 4:51 PM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pe-hj8w Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0044 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Name: Frances Howard Address: Submitter Information 4346 Campus Ave Unit 202 San Diego, CA, 92103-2456 Email: fjhoward@att.net @ i;. p~ 52 7t/C( ll/15/~017 -"*-------.. -**-----*------**-**-----------------------*-----*-*-**-*-***--*-* ---*--------~----*-***-----------_________ ,, ____ ****----~----*-------*-------*---**-**----*--------**--------------***-*--*--*-------_______ .) General Comment Please consider the possibility of oceanic problems ( especially Tsunami's , erosion, etc.,) These time bombs (the nuclear wastes) should be in a much more secluded and weather/water proof space, not subject to such _ powerful sources of danger and erosion. These discards should be much further from human populations. Thank you for your studied attention to this formidable problem. SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= -J ~r.a~5!11,J)f// lJct15J https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectid=0900006482d90287&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018