ML15057A220: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Render, DianeSent:Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:59 AMTo:'sprussm@entergy.com'Cc:Jackson, Christopher; Hardgrove, Matthew; Beasley, Benjamin; Pickett, DouglasSubject:INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT 2 - ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO CHANGE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT 3.1.4.2 FOR CONTROL ROD G-3 (TAC NO. MF5747) By letter dated February 12, 2015 (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No(s). ML15044A471 and ML15050A169), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a license amendment request for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Render, DianeSent:Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:59 AMTo:'sprussm@entergy.com'Cc:Jackson, Christopher; Hardgrove, Matthew; Beasley, Benjamin; Pickett, Douglas
 
==Subject:==
INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT 2 - ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO CHANGE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT 3.1.4.2 FOR CONTROL ROD G-3 (TAC NO. MF5747) By letter dated February 12, 2015 (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No(s). ML15044A471 and ML15050A169), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a license amendment request for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact Douglas Pickett at (301) 415-1364. Sincerely,  Diane Render, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA  Email Number:  1902  Mail Envelope Properties  (Diane.Render@nrc.gov20150226095800)   
If you have any questions, please contact Douglas Pickett at (301) 415-1364. Sincerely,  Diane Render, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA  Email Number:  1902  Mail Envelope Properties  (Diane.Render@nrc.gov20150226095800)   

Revision as of 06:04, 5 April 2018

2015/02/26 NRR E-mail Capture - Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 Acceptance of Amendment to Change Surveillance Requirement 3.1.4.2 for Control Rod G-3 (TAC No. MF5747)
ML15057A220
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/26/2015
From: Render D L
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To:
Entergy Nuclear Operations
References
TAC MF5747
Download: ML15057A220 (2)


Text

1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Render, DianeSent:Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:59 AMTo:'sprussm@entergy.com'Cc:Jackson, Christopher; Hardgrove, Matthew; Beasley, Benjamin; Pickett, Douglas

Subject:

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT 2 - ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO CHANGE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT 3.1.4.2 FOR CONTROL ROD G-3 (TAC NO. MF5747) By letter dated February 12, 2015 (Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No(s). ML15044A471 and ML15050A169), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a license amendment request for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact Douglas Pickett at (301) 415-1364. Sincerely, Diane Render, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1902 Mail Envelope Properties (Diane.Render@nrc.gov20150226095800)

Subject:

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT 2 - ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO CHANGE SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT 3.1.4.2 FOR CONTROL ROD G-3 (TAC NO. MF5747)

Sent Date: 2/26/2015 9:58:50 AM Received Date: 2/26/2015 9:58:00 AM From: Render, Diane Created By: Diane.Render@nrc.gov Recipients: "Jackson, Christopher" <Christopher.Jackson@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Hardgrove, Matthew" <Matthew.Hardgrove@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Beasley, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Beasley@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Pickett, Douglas" <Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "'sprussm@entergy.com'" <sprussm@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None

Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1902 2/26/2015 9:58:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: