ML15210A115: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Saba, FaridehSent:Tuesday, July 28, 2015 4:44 PMTo:Williams, Gordon Robert (grwilliams1@tva.gov)Cc:Schrull, Edward Dustin (edschrull@tva.gov); Hauser, Jennifer; bjhammargren@tva.gov; RidsNRRLIC109 | {{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Saba, FaridehSent:Tuesday, July 28, 2015 4:44 PMTo:Williams, Gordon Robert (grwilliams1@tva.gov)Cc:Schrull, Edward Dustin (edschrull@tva.gov); Hauser, Jennifer; bjhammargren@tva.gov; RidsNRRLIC109 Resource | ||
==Subject:== | |||
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: RELIEF REQUEST 1-ISI-27 (TAC NO. MF6401)(CNL-15-125) Importance:HighGordon, By letter dated June 26, 2015, (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15181A448), Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) submitted Relief Request for Alternative ISI-27 (RR ISI-27) for the use of alternatives to certain American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Section XI Inservice Inspection Program requirements at Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Unit No. 1. The proposed alternative would provide relief from reactor vessel circumferential weld examinations. | |||
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(z)(1) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the licensee shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety. | Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(z)(1) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the licensee shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety. |
Revision as of 05:43, 5 April 2018
ML15210A115 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Browns Ferry ![]() |
Issue date: | 07/28/2015 |
From: | Saba F E Plant Licensing Branch II |
To: | Williams G R Tennessee Valley Authority |
References | |
TAC MF6401 | |
Download: ML15210A115 (2) | |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Saba, FaridehSent:Tuesday, July 28, 2015 4:44 PMTo:Williams, Gordon Robert (grwilliams1@tva.gov)Cc:Schrull, Edward Dustin (edschrull@tva.gov); Hauser, Jennifer; bjhammargren@tva.gov; RidsNRRLIC109 Resource
Subject:
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: RELIEF REQUEST 1-ISI-27 (TAC NO. MF6401)(CNL-15-125) Importance:HighGordon, By letter dated June 26, 2015, (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15181A448), Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) submitted Relief Request for Alternative ISI-27 (RR ISI-27) for the use of alternatives to certain American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Section XI Inservice Inspection Program requirements at Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Unit No. 1. The proposed alternative would provide relief from reactor vessel circumferential weld examinations.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the relief request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(z)(1) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the licensee shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your relief request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1447 or via an email at farideh.saba@nrc.gov. Thanks, Farideh
Farideh E. Saba, P.E. Senior Project Manager NRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL 301-415-1447 Mail Stop O-8G9A Farideh.Saba@NRC.GOV Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2254 Mail Envelope Properties (Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov20150728164300)
Subject:
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: RELIEF REQUEST 1-ISI-27 (TAC NO. MF6401)(CNL-15-125) Sent Date: 7/28/2015 4:43:58 PM Received Date: 7/28/2015 4:43:00 PM From: Saba, Farideh Created By: Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov Recipients: "Schrull, Edward Dustin (edschrull@tva.gov)" <edschrull@tva.gov> Tracking Status: None "Hauser, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Hauser@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "bjhammargren@tva.gov" <bjhammargren@tva.gov>
Tracking Status: None "RidsNRRLIC109 Resource" <RidsNRRLIC109.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Williams, Gordon Robert (grwilliams1@tva.gov)" <grwilliams1@tva.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2419 7/28/2015 4:43:00 PM Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: Yes Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: ZZZ