ML20234B577: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _
                                                                                                                                          )
)
            . c.       g",7A" " ''           (
c.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT                     ,
g",7A" " ''
Memorandum                                                                                                       i l
(
To
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum i
* Files                                            DATE:    h 2 7 h57                                     j I
h 2 7 h57 j
FROM . R. H. E an Chief Researc       rower Reactor Safety Branch                                                                 ,
To Files DATE:
Division of Licensing and Regulation SUBJECr: P.G.&E.     BODEGA, DOCKET No. 50-205                                                                     l l
FROM.
Mr. Welchel of P.G.&E. called ,to ask advice as to whether                                                 !
R. H. E an Chief Researc rower Reactor Safety Branch Division of Licensing and Regulation SUBJECr:
P.G.&E. should attempt to supply answers in writing to the quertions which were propounded by the ACRS subcommittee.
P.G.&E.
Copies of these questions were distributed at a subcommittee meeting on March 13. Mr. Welchel indicated that he was                                                   J i                        willing to prepare and submit answers in writing at the coming ACRS Meeting April 11 to 13. He was advised that the submission of information at such a late. date would not allow the usual time for review to which both the staff and the                                               !
BODEGA, DOCKET No. 50-205 Mr. Welchel of P.G.&E. called,to ask advice as to whether P.G.&E. should attempt to supply answers in writing to the quertions which were propounded by the ACRS subcommittee.
ACRS are accustomed. I expressed the opinion also that it was better to submit the information late than not to sub-mit it at all,                                                                                           j Mr. Welchel suggested, and I agreed, that some of the comittee's questions were of such significance that they                                                 ]
Copies of these questions were distributed at a subcommittee meeting on March 13.
deserved a response from P.G.&E. in writing. He stated                                                   j further that they intended to respond to all of the sub-                                               I committee's questions rather than to risk overlooking scme point which the subcommittee might consider significant.
Mr. Welchel indicated that he was J
cc: R. Lowenstein E. G. Case                                                                                         I N. Watson 1
willing to prepare and submit answers in writing at the i
coming ACRS Meeting April 11 to 13.
He was advised that the submission of information at such a late. date would not allow the usual time for review to which both the staff and the ACRS are accustomed. I expressed the opinion also that it was better to submit the information late than not to sub-mit it at all, j
Mr. Welchel suggested, and I agreed, that some of the comittee's questions were of such significance that they
]
deserved a response from P.G.&E. in writing. He stated j
further that they intended to respond to all of the sub-I committee's questions rather than to risk overlooking scme point which the subcommittee might consider significant.
cc:
R. Lowenstein E. G. Case N. Watson 1
9 1
9 1
8709100472 851217E PDR     FOIA FIRESTOBS-665 PDR m-- -       ,--,m-.,_ _ .n.,.,..._.__,,.,..
8709100472 851217E PDR FOIA FIRESTOBS-665 PDR m-- -
                                                          .                  , , , , , . _ .      . _ , _ , ,_.. .                    ,.}}
,--,m-.,_ _.n.,.,..._.__,,.,..
.}}

Latest revision as of 07:01, 3 December 2024

Summarizes Welchel of PG&E Telcon Re Whether Util Should Attempt to Supply Answers in Writing to ACRS Subcommittee Questions.Agreed That Some Questions Deserve Response from Util in Writing
ML20234B577
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date: 03/27/1963
From: Bryan R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20234A767 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709180472
Download: ML20234B577 (1)


Text

_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _

)

c.

g",7A" "

(

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum i

h 2 7 h57 j

To Files DATE:

FROM.

R. H. E an Chief Researc rower Reactor Safety Branch Division of Licensing and Regulation SUBJECr:

P.G.&E.

BODEGA, DOCKET No. 50-205 Mr. Welchel of P.G.&E. called,to ask advice as to whether P.G.&E. should attempt to supply answers in writing to the quertions which were propounded by the ACRS subcommittee.

Copies of these questions were distributed at a subcommittee meeting on March 13.

Mr. Welchel indicated that he was J

willing to prepare and submit answers in writing at the i

coming ACRS Meeting April 11 to 13.

He was advised that the submission of information at such a late. date would not allow the usual time for review to which both the staff and the ACRS are accustomed. I expressed the opinion also that it was better to submit the information late than not to sub-mit it at all, j

Mr. Welchel suggested, and I agreed, that some of the comittee's questions were of such significance that they

]

deserved a response from P.G.&E. in writing. He stated j

further that they intended to respond to all of the sub-I committee's questions rather than to risk overlooking scme point which the subcommittee might consider significant.

cc:

R. Lowenstein E. G. Case N. Watson 1

9 1

8709100472 851217E PDR FOIA FIRESTOBS-665 PDR m-- -

,--,m-.,_ _.n.,.,..._.__,,.,..

.