ML20234B577: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ | {{#Wiki_filter:_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ | ||
) | |||
c. | |||
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT | g",7A" " '' | ||
Memorandum | ( | ||
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum i | |||
h 2 7 h57 j | |||
FROM . R. H. E an Chief Researc | To Files DATE: | ||
Division of Licensing and Regulation SUBJECr: P.G.&E. | FROM. | ||
Mr. Welchel of P.G.&E. called ,to ask advice as to whether | R. H. E an Chief Researc rower Reactor Safety Branch Division of Licensing and Regulation SUBJECr: | ||
P.G.&E. should attempt to supply answers in writing to the quertions which were propounded by the ACRS subcommittee. | P.G.&E. | ||
Copies of these questions were distributed at a subcommittee meeting on March 13. Mr. Welchel indicated that he was | BODEGA, DOCKET No. 50-205 Mr. Welchel of P.G.&E. called,to ask advice as to whether P.G.&E. should attempt to supply answers in writing to the quertions which were propounded by the ACRS subcommittee. | ||
ACRS are accustomed. I expressed the opinion also that it was better to submit the information late than not to sub-mit it at all, | Copies of these questions were distributed at a subcommittee meeting on March 13. | ||
deserved a response from P.G.&E. in writing. He stated | Mr. Welchel indicated that he was J | ||
cc: | willing to prepare and submit answers in writing at the i | ||
coming ACRS Meeting April 11 to 13. | |||
He was advised that the submission of information at such a late. date would not allow the usual time for review to which both the staff and the ACRS are accustomed. I expressed the opinion also that it was better to submit the information late than not to sub-mit it at all, j | |||
Mr. Welchel suggested, and I agreed, that some of the comittee's questions were of such significance that they | |||
] | |||
deserved a response from P.G.&E. in writing. He stated j | |||
further that they intended to respond to all of the sub-I committee's questions rather than to risk overlooking scme point which the subcommittee might consider significant. | |||
cc: | |||
R. Lowenstein E. G. Case N. Watson 1 | |||
9 1 | 9 1 | ||
8709100472 851217E PDR | 8709100472 851217E PDR FOIA FIRESTOBS-665 PDR m-- - | ||
,--,m-.,_ _.n.,.,..._.__,,.,.. | |||
.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:01, 3 December 2024
Text
_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _
)
c.
g",7A" "
(
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum i
h 2 7 h57 j
To Files DATE:
FROM.
R. H. E an Chief Researc rower Reactor Safety Branch Division of Licensing and Regulation SUBJECr:
P.G.&E.
BODEGA, DOCKET No. 50-205 Mr. Welchel of P.G.&E. called,to ask advice as to whether P.G.&E. should attempt to supply answers in writing to the quertions which were propounded by the ACRS subcommittee.
Copies of these questions were distributed at a subcommittee meeting on March 13.
Mr. Welchel indicated that he was J
willing to prepare and submit answers in writing at the i
coming ACRS Meeting April 11 to 13.
He was advised that the submission of information at such a late. date would not allow the usual time for review to which both the staff and the ACRS are accustomed. I expressed the opinion also that it was better to submit the information late than not to sub-mit it at all, j
Mr. Welchel suggested, and I agreed, that some of the comittee's questions were of such significance that they
]
deserved a response from P.G.&E. in writing. He stated j
further that they intended to respond to all of the sub-I committee's questions rather than to risk overlooking scme point which the subcommittee might consider significant.
cc:
R. Lowenstein E. G. Case N. Watson 1
9 1
8709100472 851217E PDR FOIA FIRESTOBS-665 PDR m-- -
,--,m-.,_ _.n.,.,..._.__,,.,..
.