ML18085B128: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 34: Line 34:
(£]2J tcovered that a discrepancy exists between the construction specification and the desigq
(£]2J tcovered that a discrepancy exists between the construction specification and the desigq
  ~            I drawings for a masonry block wall in the Aux Building Elev. 122'.                                                                            The corridor wall
  ~            I drawings for a masonry block wall in the Aux Building Elev. 122'.                                                                            The corridor wall
[Q]]J ion Elev. 100' separating Unit 1 from Unit 2 was found deficient.                                                                                    On 12/1/80, it was
[Q))J ion Elev. 100' separating Unit 1 from Unit 2 was found deficient.                                                                                    On 12/1/80, it was
[QJI] !discovered that the Controlled Facilities Building and its associated walkway exceed
[QJI] !discovered that the Controlled Facilities Building and its associated walkway exceed
[£I2J !the allowable design stress during a site seismic event.                                                                            However, we believe that thej
[£I2J !the allowable design stress during a site seismic event.                                                                            However, we believe that thej
[[]]]I ultimate structural capacity of this building would not be exceeded during a site safej 1        8  s shutdown earthauake.                                                                                                                                                                80 SYSTEM'            CAUSE            CAUSE                                                            COMP.          VALVE CODE              CODE          SUBCODE                  COMPONENT CODE                          SUB CODE          SUBCOOE
(())]I ultimate structural capacity of this building would not be exceeded during a site safej 1        8  s shutdown earthauake.                                                                                                                                                                80 SYSTEM'            CAUSE            CAUSE                                                            COMP.          VALVE CODE              CODE          SUBCODE                  COMPONENT CODE                          SUB CODE          SUBCOOE
[ill]                                  lzlzl@                ~@              L£J@ !zlzlz1z1*z1z1@ 12..J@) ~@
[ill]                                  lzlzl@                ~@              L£J@ !zlzlz1z1*z1z1@ 12..J@) ~@
7        B                          9          10        11              12            13                                    1B          19              20 t;::;\  LE R RO  CVI 8  ENT YE/l.R I 02LI SEQUENTIAL REPORT NO.
7        B                          9          10        11              12            13                                    1B          19              20 t;::;\  LE R RO  CVI 8  ENT YE/l.R I 02LI SEQUENTIAL REPORT NO.

Latest revision as of 18:16, 17 March 2020

LER 80-056/01X-2:on 801107,discovered That Discrepancy Exists Between Const Specs & Design Drawings for Masonry Block Wall in Auxiliary Bldg Elevation 122 Feet.Caused by Conflict Between Specs & Drawings for Walls
ML18085B128
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/24/1981
From: Steele W
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML18085B127 List:
References
IEB-80-11, LER-80-056-01X-01, LER-80-56-1X-1, NUDOCS 8104020587
Download: ML18085B128 (2)


Text

March 27, 1981 TO ALL LER RECIPIENTS LER 80-56/0lX-2 Please replace previously sent LET 80-56/0lX-2 with the attached copy.

Thank you.

LER Coordinator JDP:rp Attachment

(-foo?

5 I~

NRC FORM 366

.!7*77) ~

CONTROL BLOCK: I 1

ft LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 6

10 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY-COMMISSION (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION)

~IN IJ Is I GI sl1 101 ol ol -I oJ oJ ol oJ ol -1 ol ol(Dl4 J 1J 1 l 1l 1l@I I 1© 7 B 9 LICEN!".EE CODE 14 15 LICENSE NUMBER 25 26 LICENSE. TYPE JO 57 CAT SB CON'T (iliJ 7 B

~~~~~ L!J© I 60 61 oI s f oIo I o I 2 I 1 I 2 GI DOCKET l\IUMBER 6B 69 1I l I o I 1 I s I o JG) l oJ 3 I 21 EVENT DATE 74 751 4

REPORT DATE I a 11 10 BO EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLc CONSEQUENCES@

!During an investigation of masonry walls pursuant to NRC Bulletin IE 80-11, it was disj

(£]2J tcovered that a discrepancy exists between the construction specification and the desigq

~ I drawings for a masonry block wall in the Aux Building Elev. 122'. The corridor wall

[Q))J ion Elev. 100' separating Unit 1 from Unit 2 was found deficient. On 12/1/80, it was

[QJI] !discovered that the Controlled Facilities Building and its associated walkway exceed

[£I2J !the allowable design stress during a site seismic event. However, we believe that thej

(())]I ultimate structural capacity of this building would not be exceeded during a site safej 1 8 s shutdown earthauake. 80 SYSTEM' CAUSE CAUSE COMP. VALVE CODE CODE SUBCODE COMPONENT CODE SUB CODE SUBCOOE

[ill] lzlzl@ ~@ L£J@ !zlzlz1z1*z1z1@ 12..J@) ~@

7 B 9 10 11 12 13 1B 19 20 t;::;\ LE R RO CVI 8 ENT YE/l.R I 02LI SEQUENTIAL REPORT NO.

OCCURRENCE CODE REFORT TYPE REVISror.

NC.

1\.:.,1 REPORT NUMBER IOISl61 , ....... , 1°1 1 1 ~ I I l2J 21 23 24 26 27 2B 29 30 31 32 ACTION FUTURE EFFECT SHUTDOWN (':;::;i. ATTACHMENT NPRD-4 PRIME COMP. CO~PONEl\;T TAKE'* ACTION OPll PLANT METHOD HOURS ~ SUBMITTED FORM ~UB. SUPPLIER MANUFACTURER l..LJ@W@)

33 34 W@

3&

~

36 I ol ol 01 ol 37 40 W@

41 W@

, 42 UJ I u Io Is Io I@

43 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS@

!The cause of the incident is a conflict between specifications and drawings for the wa~ls

[I]JJ Ion Elev. 122', continual long term interruptions during construction of the wall on

[III] !Elev. 100' and the wanting design of the walls of the Controlled Facilities Building r:IIIJ I and its associated walkways. The walls on Elev. 100' and 122' in each unit were re-

[II3J I inforced with structural steel. The Controlled Facilities Building was reinforced witl}

1 a .stie rods and gusset plates. The ~lkway was reinforced with cross braces. 80 FACILITY 30 METHOD OF t:;:::..

STATUS 'II. POWER OTHER STATUS DISCOVERV DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION ~

ElIJ l.!!..J@) I 0 I 0 I 0 l@I1'3 7 8 9 10 12 .

N/A 44 f ~@I 45 NRC Observation

~46 ACTIVITY CONTENT C\ 80 RELEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY~ LOCATION OF RELEASE@

Em~@) W@l N/A ,. N/A l 7 8 9 10 11 44 4S 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES r,;;;..

NUMBER ~ TVPE DESCRIPTION~

[ill]

7 8 9 I oI o I oJL!J~I11 12 13

___N,_./..:.:A'--------------------~ 80 PERSONNEL INJURIES ~

NUMBER DESCRIPTION~

~I 7 8 9 ol ol ol~

11 NA

~12::--------=----------------------------------------~8~0 LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACILITY '4J\

TYPE DESCRIPTION ~

D.TIJ L!.J@

7 8 9 N A

~10~-----------..!!l..!!----------------------------------------~

PUBLICITY Q\ 80

~ ISSUEDI.::;\ DESCRIPTION~ NRC USE ONLY .,

~

7 8 9 LliJei~L~~------..!N~/~A-----------~--__.J 10 6B 69 I I I I I I I I I I I I80I~0 B 164 0 2 (f S'f-l PREPARER _ _w_._J_._s_te_e_l_e_ _ _ _ _ _ __ PHONE. _ _6_0_9;_-_9_;3;..:;5~-..:0..:.9..:.9.::.B_ _ __

0 a.

"