ML070080225: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:iuU11 VVU1iYdiiiy | {{#Wiki_filter:'.3fl iuU11 VVU1iYdiiiy - r11V. OLU11 nt-VWeIU %'.~r, k*'4Uo1 eO)ii rdli-age -age I I From: Pat Gwynn / | ||
-r11V. OLU11 nt-VWeIU %'.~r, | To: C[) -Cupidon, Les; Weerakkody, Sunil Date: Tue, May 9, 2006 9:26 AM | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: Staff Revised CRGR #408 (April 25) Package Sunil -As we discussed via telephone this morning, the change proposed by your staff to the generic letter language is an acceptable approach to the resolution of my concern.>>> Sunil Weerakkody 5/8/2006 12:11:08 PM >>>Pat: We met with individual members (Rich Barrett, Bruce Boger) to fully understand further explain our intentions. | Re: Staff Revised CRGR #408 (April 25) Package Sunil - As we discussed via telephone this morning, the change proposed by your staff to the generic letter language is an acceptable approach to the resolution of my concern. | ||
We would like to do the same with you via a conference call. What is your availability tomorror for a 15 minute call? I would like to fully address your comment, before asking for CRGR endorsement. | >>> Sunil Weerakkody 5/8/2006 12:11:08 PM >>> | ||
Thank you.Sunil>>> Pat Gwynn 05/08/06 12:39 PM >>>Les"However, for Byron Station, Units 1 and | Pat: | ||
As discussed in this GL, the Imposition of the position with respect to multiple spurious actuations is necessary to comply with the (unchanged) staff | We met with individual members (Rich Barrett, Bruce Boger) to fully understand further explain our intentions. We would like to do the same with you via a conference call. What is your availability tomorror for a 15 minute call? I would like to fully address your comment, before asking for CRGR endorsement. | ||
,,,,,,I, h, rt. | Thank you. | ||
* ooert VVOI~gang | Sunil | ||
-me: biT hevisea u-i'.ri u~u k~prni z) raC~age rage z I I Attached is the redline strikeout revised version of the April 25th, CRGR #408 package (GL, comment resolution and Appendix C of CRGR Q&A). Please verify if your concerns and recommendations have been address so that staff may proceed.Thank you Les CC: Bahadur, Sher; Barrett, Richard; Boger, Bruce; Borchardt, Richard; Federline, Margaret; Glitter, Joseph; Markley, Anthony; Quay, Theodore; Wiggins, James; Winsberg, Kathryn;Wolfgang, Robert C op JW}O0OO1.TMP Page 1 [Mail Envelope Properties (44609895.AOE: | >>> Pat Gwynn 05/08/06 12:39 PM >>> | ||
0 :64220) | Les "However,for Byron Station, Units 1 and2 and BraidwoodStation, Units 1 and 2, the staff positions with respect to one spuriousactuationper fire representsa change In staff position, and if appliedto the licensees of these plants, would constitute backfits under 10 CFR 50.109(a)(4)(i). | ||
As discussed in this GL, the Imposition of the position with respect to multiple spurious actuations is necessary to comply with the (unchanged)staff Interpretationof 10 CFR 50.48 and 10 CFR Part50, Appendix A, GDC 3. Staff approvalof the "single spuriousactuationper fire event" for Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 and BraidwoodStation, Units 1 and2 constitutedstaff Inconsistencies with respect to the necessary prerequisitesfor demonstratingcompliance with 10 CFR 50.48 and 10 CFR Part50, Appendix A, GDC 3, and the inconsistencle.' ,,,,,,I, h, rt.ifiedby any backfittinaImaosed by the NRC in accordancewith this GL. | |||
MD 8.4, Management of Facility-specific Backfitting and Information Collection, Handbook Part I. B. | |||
"Information Collection Requests", says "The provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f) require the nuclear power reactor licensees to respond to both generic and facility-specific information requests from the staff. This rule stipulates that except for information sought to verify licensee compliance with the current licensing basis, NRC must prepare the reasons for the information request to ensure that the burden imposed on licensees is justified in view of the potential safety (or security) significance of the issue to be addressed." | |||
V/>>> Les Cupidon 5/4/2006 6:59:30 AM >>> | |||
CRGR, Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions A-EOIA- | |||
* ooert VVOI~gang - me: biT hevisea u-i'.ri u~u k~prni z) raC~age rage z I I | |||
Attached is the redline strikeout revised version of the April 25th, CRGR #408 package (GL, comment resolution and Appendix C of CRGR Q&A). Please verify if your concerns and recommendations have been address so that staff may proceed. | |||
Thank you Les CC: Bahadur, Sher; Barrett, Richard; Boger, Bruce; Borchardt, Richard; Federline, Margaret; Glitter, Joseph; Markley, Anthony; Quay, Theodore; Wiggins, James; Winsberg, Kathryn; Wolfgang, Robert | |||
C op JW}O0OO1.TMP Page 1 [ | |||
Mail Envelope Properties (44609895.AOE: 0 :64220) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: Staff Revised CRGR #408 (April 25) Package Creation Date Tue, May 9, 2006 8:26.AM From: Pat Gwynn Created By: TPGO~nrc.fov Recipients Action Date & Time nrc.gov BAB2 CC (Bruce Boger) Delivered 05/09/06 8:26 AM Opened 05/09/06 9:02 AM Deleted 05/09/06 9:02 AM LRC (Les Cupidon) Opened 05/09/06 8:27 AM RJB3 CC (Richard Barrett) Opened 05/09/06 9:09 AM Deleted 05/09/06 9:09 AM Emptied 05/14/06 12:28 AM RWB1 CC (Richard Borchardt) Opened 05/09/06 9:35 AM Deleted 05/09/06 9:35 AM SXB CC (Sher Bahadur) Opened 05/09/06 9:04 AM Deleted 05/15/06 9:27 AM nrc.gov JGG CC (Joseph Giitter) Delivered 05/09/06 8:27 AM Opened 05/09/06 9:00 AM MVF CC (Margaret Federline) nrc.gov AWM CC (Anthony Markley) Delivered 05/09/06 8:26 AM Opened 05/09/06 9:20 AM TRQ CC (Theodore Quay) Opened 05/09/06 11:57 AM Deleted 05/09/06 12:25 PM Emptied 05/14/06 1:17 AM nrc.gov JTW1 CC (James Wiggins) Delivered 05/09/06 8:26 AM Opened 05/09/06 1:56 PM KLW CC (Kathryn Winsberg) Deleted 05/09/06 1:56 PM Opened 05/09/06 9:05 AM RJWI CC (Robert Wolfgang) Opened 05/09/06 8:54 AM Emptied 05/09/06 11:50 AM SDWl (Sunil Weerakkody) Opened 05/09/06 8:27 AM Replied 05/09/06 8:28 AM Deleted 05/09/06 12:10 PM | |||
.pk.jWJ00001.TMP Page 2 1 Page 2 1 p~~W}OOOQ1 .TMP | |||
.pk.jWJ00001.TMP Page 2 1 1 p~~W}OOOQ1 .TMP | ) ° L "t, Emptied 05/14/06 12:53 AM Post Office Delivered Route nrc.gov nrc.gov nrc.gov nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 5094 Tuesday, May 9, 2006 8:26 AM Pat Gwynn.vcf 685 Tuesday, May 9, 2006 8:26 AM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: No Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | ||
Priority: ReplyRequested: | |||
Return Notification: | |||
Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Security: To Be Delivered: | No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: All Information | ||
Status Tracking: | |||
NRC FORM SC (7-94) | |||
NRCMD 3.57 COVER SHEET FOR CORRESPONDENCE USE THIS COVER SHEET TO PROTECT ORIGINALS OF MULTI-PAGE CORRESPONDENCE}} |
Latest revision as of 10:48, 23 November 2019
ML070080225 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Byron, Braidwood |
Issue date: | 05/09/2006 |
From: | Gwynn P NRC Region 4 |
To: | Les Cupidon, Sunil Weerakkody Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2007-0018 | |
Download: ML070080225 (5) | |
Text
'.3fl iuU11 VVU1iYdiiiy - r11V. OLU11 nt-VWeIU %'.~r, k*'4Uo1 eO)ii rdli-age -age I I From: Pat Gwynn /
To: C[) -Cupidon, Les; Weerakkody, Sunil Date: Tue, May 9, 2006 9:26 AM
Subject:
Re: Staff Revised CRGR #408 (April 25) Package Sunil - As we discussed via telephone this morning, the change proposed by your staff to the generic letter language is an acceptable approach to the resolution of my concern.
>>> Sunil Weerakkody 5/8/2006 12:11:08 PM >>>
Pat:
We met with individual members (Rich Barrett, Bruce Boger) to fully understand further explain our intentions. We would like to do the same with you via a conference call. What is your availability tomorror for a 15 minute call? I would like to fully address your comment, before asking for CRGR endorsement.
Thank you.
Sunil
>>> Pat Gwynn 05/08/06 12:39 PM >>>
Les "However,for Byron Station, Units 1 and2 and BraidwoodStation, Units 1 and 2, the staff positions with respect to one spuriousactuationper fire representsa change In staff position, and if appliedto the licensees of these plants, would constitute backfits under 10 CFR 50.109(a)(4)(i).
As discussed in this GL, the Imposition of the position with respect to multiple spurious actuations is necessary to comply with the (unchanged)staff Interpretationof 10 CFR 50.48 and 10 CFR Part50, Appendix A, GDC 3. Staff approvalof the "single spuriousactuationper fire event" for Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 and BraidwoodStation, Units 1 and2 constitutedstaff Inconsistencies with respect to the necessary prerequisitesfor demonstratingcompliance with 10 CFR 50.48 and 10 CFR Part50, Appendix A, GDC 3, and the inconsistencle.' ,,,,,,I, h, rt.ifiedby any backfittinaImaosed by the NRC in accordancewith this GL.
MD 8.4, Management of Facility-specific Backfitting and Information Collection, Handbook Part I. B.
"Information Collection Requests", says "The provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(f) require the nuclear power reactor licensees to respond to both generic and facility-specific information requests from the staff. This rule stipulates that except for information sought to verify licensee compliance with the current licensing basis, NRC must prepare the reasons for the information request to ensure that the burden imposed on licensees is justified in view of the potential safety (or security) significance of the issue to be addressed."
V/>>> Les Cupidon 5/4/2006 6:59:30 AM >>>
CRGR, Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions A-EOIA-
- ooert VVOI~gang - me: biT hevisea u-i'.ri u~u k~prni z) raC~age rage z I I
Attached is the redline strikeout revised version of the April 25th, CRGR #408 package (GL, comment resolution and Appendix C of CRGR Q&A). Please verify if your concerns and recommendations have been address so that staff may proceed.
Thank you Les CC: Bahadur, Sher; Barrett, Richard; Boger, Bruce; Borchardt, Richard; Federline, Margaret; Glitter, Joseph; Markley, Anthony; Quay, Theodore; Wiggins, James; Winsberg, Kathryn; Wolfgang, Robert
C op JW}O0OO1.TMP Page 1 [
Mail Envelope Properties (44609895.AOE: 0 :64220)
Subject:
Re: Staff Revised CRGR #408 (April 25) Package Creation Date Tue, May 9, 2006 8:26.AM From: Pat Gwynn Created By: TPGO~nrc.fov Recipients Action Date & Time nrc.gov BAB2 CC (Bruce Boger) Delivered 05/09/06 8:26 AM Opened 05/09/06 9:02 AM Deleted 05/09/06 9:02 AM LRC (Les Cupidon) Opened 05/09/06 8:27 AM RJB3 CC (Richard Barrett) Opened 05/09/06 9:09 AM Deleted 05/09/06 9:09 AM Emptied 05/14/06 12:28 AM RWB1 CC (Richard Borchardt) Opened 05/09/06 9:35 AM Deleted 05/09/06 9:35 AM SXB CC (Sher Bahadur) Opened 05/09/06 9:04 AM Deleted 05/15/06 9:27 AM nrc.gov JGG CC (Joseph Giitter) Delivered 05/09/06 8:27 AM Opened 05/09/06 9:00 AM MVF CC (Margaret Federline) nrc.gov AWM CC (Anthony Markley) Delivered 05/09/06 8:26 AM Opened 05/09/06 9:20 AM TRQ CC (Theodore Quay) Opened 05/09/06 11:57 AM Deleted 05/09/06 12:25 PM Emptied 05/14/06 1:17 AM nrc.gov JTW1 CC (James Wiggins) Delivered 05/09/06 8:26 AM Opened 05/09/06 1:56 PM KLW CC (Kathryn Winsberg) Deleted 05/09/06 1:56 PM Opened 05/09/06 9:05 AM RJWI CC (Robert Wolfgang) Opened 05/09/06 8:54 AM Emptied 05/09/06 11:50 AM SDWl (Sunil Weerakkody) Opened 05/09/06 8:27 AM Replied 05/09/06 8:28 AM Deleted 05/09/06 12:10 PM
.pk.jWJ00001.TMP Page 2 1 Page 2 1 p~~W}OOOQ1 .TMP
) ° L "t, Emptied 05/14/06 12:53 AM Post Office Delivered Route nrc.gov nrc.gov nrc.gov nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 5094 Tuesday, May 9, 2006 8:26 AM Pat Gwynn.vcf 685 Tuesday, May 9, 2006 8:26 AM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: No Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: All Information
NRC FORM SC (7-94)
NRCMD 3.57 COVER SHEET FOR CORRESPONDENCE USE THIS COVER SHEET TO PROTECT ORIGINALS OF MULTI-PAGE CORRESPONDENCE