L-2009-076, Submittal of Core Operating Limits Report: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:0 FPL.POWERING TODAY.EMPOWERING TOMORROW.0 APR 0 7.2009 L-2009-076 10 CFR 50.36 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-00001 Re: Turkey Point Unit 3 Docket No. 50-250 Core Operating Limits Report In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.7, the attached Core Operating Limits Report is provided for Turkey Point Unit 3. These curves are applicable for Unit 3 Cycle 24.Should there be any questions, please contact Robert J. Tomonto, Licensing Manager, at 305-246-7327.Site Vice rresidentL-/
{{#Wiki_filter:0   FPL.
Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Attachment cc: Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant A A-J~an FPL Group company Attachment to L-2009-076 Page 1 of 3 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT -UNIT 3 CYCLE 24 The Technical Specifications (TS) affected by this report are: 3.1.3.2 Analog Rod Position Indication System 3.1.3.6 Control Rod Insertion Limits 3.2.1 Axial Flux Difference (AFD)3.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor -FQ(Z)3.2.3 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor -FAH The Control Rod Insertion Limits, AFD, FQ(Z), K(Z), and FAH have been developed using the NRC approved methodology specified in TS 6.9.1.7.TS 3.1.3.2 Analog Rod Position Indication System The All Rods Out position for all Shutdown Banks and Control Banks is defined to be 229 steps withdrawn.
POWERING TODAY.
TS 3.1.3.6 Control Rod Insertion Limits The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown on Figure 1 for All Rods Out = 229 steps withdrawn.
EMPOWERING TOMORROW.0                                         APR 0 7.2009 L-2009-076 10 CFR 50.36 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-00001 Re:       Turkey Point Unit 3 Docket No. 50-250 Core Operating Limits Report In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.7, the attached Core Operating Limits Report is provided for Turkey Point Unit 3. These curves are applicable for Unit 3 Cycle 24.
TS 3.2.1 Axial Flux Difference The AFD limits are provided on Figure 2.TS 3.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor -FQ(Z)FQIL =2.5 0 K(Z) = 1.0 for 0 ft. < Z < 12 ft. where Z =,core height.TS 3.2.3 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor RTP FAH =1.70 PFAH = 0.3 Attachment to L-2009-076 Page 2 of 3 Turkey Figure 1 Point Unit 3 -Cycle 24 Rod Insertion Limits vs Thermal Power 41*0 0.a..230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0--U OL.pS VVILIlUrdWII, Overlap IU I QLe s 64.0, 29)(5!.221 _;_; ( 00,1O 01)Ban D 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent Reactor Power 70 80 90 100 Attachment to L-2009-076 Page 3 of 3 120 100 e 0 3.,-J I--0 Ul'6 2 2 4-.80 60 40 Figure 2 Axial Flux Difference as a Function of Rated Thermal Power Turkey Point Unit 3 -We 24 (-1,,100)
Should there be any questions, please contact Robert J. Tomonto, Licensing Manager, at 305-246-7327.
(+7,10()UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE OP RATION OPERATION ACCEPT BLE (-30,50) ION (+25,50)20 0-50-40 20-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Axial Flux Difference
Site Vice rresidentL-/
(%)}}
Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Attachment cc:       Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant AA-J~
an FPL Group company
 
Attachment to L-2009-076 Page 1 of 3 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT - UNIT 3 CYCLE 24 The Technical Specifications (TS) affected by this report are:
3.1.3.2       Analog Rod Position Indication System 3.1.3.6       Control Rod Insertion Limits 3.2.1         Axial Flux Difference (AFD) 3.2.2         Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - FQ(Z) 3.2.3         Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - FAH The Control Rod Insertion Limits, AFD, FQ(Z), K(Z), and FAH have been developed using the NRC approved methodology specified in TS 6.9.1.7.
TS 3.1.3.2     Analog Rod Position Indication System The All Rods Out position for all Shutdown Banks and Control Banks is defined to be 229 steps withdrawn.
TS 3.1.3.6     Control Rod Insertion Limits The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown on Figure 1 for All Rods Out = 229 steps withdrawn.
TS 3.2.1       Axial Flux Difference The AFD limits are provided on Figure 2.
TS 3.2.2       Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - FQ(Z)
FQIL = 2 .5 0 K(Z) = 1.0 for 0 ft. < Z < 12 ft. where Z =,core height.
TS 3.2.3       Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor RTP FAH =1.70 PFAH = 0.3
 
Attachment to L-2009-076 Page 2 of 3 Figure 1 Turkey Point Unit 3 - Cycle 24 Rod Insertion Limits vs Thermal Power
                                  - - U *-.4Z? OL.pS VVILIlUrdWII,   Overlap   IU I QLe s 230 64.0, 29) 220                                          (5!.221       _*
210 200 190 180 170
_;_;                                                                   ( 00,1O 01) 41  160
*0  150 140
: 0. 130 a..
120 Ban D 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
0        10       20       30         40       50         60       70       80 90     100 Percent Reactor Power
 
Attachment to L-2009-076 Page 3 of 3 Figure 2 Axial Flux Difference as a Function of Rated Thermal Power 120 Turkey Point Unit 3 -       We 24
(-1,,100)           (+7,10()
100 e
0
: 3. 80
,-J UNACCEPTABLE                                                           UNACCEPTABLE OP RATION                                                             OPERATION I--  60 Ul 0
ACCEPT BLE
(-30,50)                     ION             (+25,50)
'6 2    40 2
4-.
20 0
        -50       -40   -30          -20   -10         0         10       20     30       40 50 Axial Flux Difference (%)}}

Latest revision as of 07:53, 14 November 2019

Submittal of Core Operating Limits Report
ML091120332
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/07/2009
From: Jefferson W
Florida Power & Light Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2009-076
Download: ML091120332 (4)


Text

0 FPL.

POWERING TODAY.

EMPOWERING TOMORROW.0 APR 0 7.2009 L-2009-076 10 CFR 50.36 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-00001 Re: Turkey Point Unit 3 Docket No. 50-250 Core Operating Limits Report In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.7, the attached Core Operating Limits Report is provided for Turkey Point Unit 3. These curves are applicable for Unit 3 Cycle 24.

Should there be any questions, please contact Robert J. Tomonto, Licensing Manager, at 305-246-7327.

Site Vice rresidentL-/

Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Attachment cc: Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant AA-J~

an FPL Group company

Attachment to L-2009-076 Page 1 of 3 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT - UNIT 3 CYCLE 24 The Technical Specifications (TS) affected by this report are:

3.1.3.2 Analog Rod Position Indication System 3.1.3.6 Control Rod Insertion Limits 3.2.1 Axial Flux Difference (AFD) 3.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - FQ(Z) 3.2.3 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor - FAH The Control Rod Insertion Limits, AFD, FQ(Z), K(Z), and FAH have been developed using the NRC approved methodology specified in TS 6.9.1.7.

TS 3.1.3.2 Analog Rod Position Indication System The All Rods Out position for all Shutdown Banks and Control Banks is defined to be 229 steps withdrawn.

TS 3.1.3.6 Control Rod Insertion Limits The control rod banks shall be limited in physical insertion as shown on Figure 1 for All Rods Out = 229 steps withdrawn.

TS 3.2.1 Axial Flux Difference The AFD limits are provided on Figure 2.

TS 3.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor - FQ(Z)

FQIL = 2 .5 0 K(Z) = 1.0 for 0 ft. < Z < 12 ft. where Z =,core height.

TS 3.2.3 Nuclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor RTP FAH =1.70 PFAH = 0.3

Attachment to L-2009-076 Page 2 of 3 Figure 1 Turkey Point Unit 3 - Cycle 24 Rod Insertion Limits vs Thermal Power

- - U *-.4Z? OL.pS VVILIlUrdWII, Overlap IU I QLe s 230 64.0, 29) 220 (5!.221 _*

210 200 190 180 170

_;_; ( 00,1O 01) 41 160

  • 0 150 140
0. 130 a..

120 Ban D 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Reactor Power

Attachment to L-2009-076 Page 3 of 3 Figure 2 Axial Flux Difference as a Function of Rated Thermal Power 120 Turkey Point Unit 3 - We 24

(-1,,100) (+7,10()

100 e

0

3. 80

,-J UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE OP RATION OPERATION I-- 60 Ul 0

ACCEPT BLE

(-30,50) ION (+25,50)

'6 2 40 2

4-.

20 0

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Axial Flux Difference (%)