Text

2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
	ML23132A176
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	05/12/2023
From:	Strand D; Florida Power & Light Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk
References
	L-2023-061
	Download: ML23132A176 (1)
	v • d • e

May 12, 2023 L-2023-061 10 CFR 50.36b U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Re: Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Enclosed is the 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4, as required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.3.

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Kenneth Mack at 561-904-3635.

Sincerely, vs Dianne Strand General Manager, Regulatory Affairs Florida Power & Light Company

Enclosure:

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (2022) cc: USNRC Regional Administrator, Region II USNRC Project Manager, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant USNRC Resident Inspector, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant

Page 1 of 56 Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 YEAR: 2022 Docket NOS Number: 50-250, 50-251 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 2 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

.............................................................................................................5 1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ...................................................................5 1.2 Reporting Levels ...................................................................................................................6 1.3 Sample Deviations ................................................................................................................6 1.4 Program Modifications...........................................................................................................6

2.0 INTRODUCTION

........................................................................................................................7 2.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ...................................................................7 A. Purpose ............................................................................................................................7 2.2 Pathways Monitored ..............................................................................................................8 2.3 Land Use Census..................................................................................................................8 3.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS ......................9 4.0 INTERPRETATION AND TRENDS OF RESULTS ....................................................................16 4.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results..................................................................16 4.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (TLD) Sample Results ........................................................17 4.3 Waterborne Sample Results................................................................................................17 4.3.1 Surface Water Results ............................................................................................................... 17 4.3.2 Shoreline Sediment Sample Results ......................................................................................... 18 4.4 Ingestion Sample Results ....................................................................................................18 4.4.1 Crustacea and Fish Sample Results ........................................................................................... 18 4.4.2 Broad Leaf Vegetation Sample Results ...................................................................................... 18 4.5 Land Use Census Results ...................................................................................................18 4.6 Interlaboratory Comparison Results ....................................................................................25 5.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

..........................25

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 3 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report ATTACHMENTS - Sample Deviations ........................................................................................................29 - Monitoring Results Tables ............................................................................................31 - Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results ...............................................................48 1.0 Summary.. .....................................................................................................................................48 - Industry Initiative Ground Water Protection Program, 2022 ..........................................51 1.0 Description of Program ..................................................................................................................51 2.0 Discussion.. ...................................................................................................................................51 3.0 Results ...................................................................................................................................51 - ERRATA Data 2022......................................................................................................55 1.0 List of changes from the 2021 AREOR ..........................................................................................55 TABLES Table 1: Exposure Pathway - Airborne ........................................................................................9 Table 2: Exposure Pathway - Direct Radiation ..........................................................................10 Table 3: Exposure Pathway - Waterborne .................................................................................12 Table 4: Exposure Pathway - Ingestion .....................................................................................13 Table 5: Land Use Census - 2022 Nearest Residence, Garden and Milk Animal Within 5 Miles............................................................................................................................19 Table 6: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary .........................................26 Table 7: Sample Deviations Table.............................................................................................29 Table 8: Air Particulate - Gross Beta .........................................................................................32 Table 9: Air Particulate Composite - Gamma ............................................................................33 Table 10: Air Cartridges - Iodine-131 ........................................................................................34 Table 11: Direct Radiation - Indicators ......................................................................................35 Table 12: Direct Radiation- Control ...........................................................................................35 Table 13: Surface Water - Tritium and Gamma .........................................................................36 Table 14: Shoreline Sediment - Gamma ...................................................................................37 Table 15: Crustacea - Gamma ..................................................................................................38

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 4 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TABLES (CONT'D)

Table 16: Fish - Gamma............................................................................................................39 Table 17: Broad Leaf Vegetation - Gamma ...............................................................................40 Table 18: Supplemental Direct Radiation - Indicators ................................................................41 Table 19: Supplemental Air Particulate - Gross Beta.................................................................42 Table 20: Supplemental Air Particulate Composite - Gamma ....................................................43 Table 21: Supplemental Air Cartridges - Iodine-131 ..................................................................44 Table 22: Supplemental Surface Water - Tritium and Gamma ..................................................45 Table 23: Supplemental Shoreline Sediment - Gamma .............................................................46 Table 24: Supplemental Food Crops - Gamma .........................................................................47 Table 25: DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) 46 results .......................................................................................................................................49 Table 26: DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) 47 results .......................................................................................................................................50 Table 27: Ground Water - Tritium ..............................................................................................52 FIGURES Figure 1: Sample Collection Sites - Near Station .......................................................................14 Figure 2: Sample Collection Sites - Distant from Station ...........................................................15 Figure 3: Turkey Point 2022 REMP Gross Beta in Air, pCi/m3 ...................................................16 Figure 4: 2022 PTN Direct Exposure TLDs: Quarterly Collection ..............................................17 Figure 5: Onsite Tritium Monitoring Wells ..................................................................................54

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 5 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1.0 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program The data obtained through the Turkey Point Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples are not increasing. These measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4, during the surveillance year, is well within the limits established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. The sampling period was from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022. Additionally, supplemental samples collected by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH), do not indicate adverse trends in the radiological environment.

All required lower limit of detection (LLD) capabilities were achieved in all sample analyses during 2022, as required by the Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Technical Specifications. No measurable levels of radiation above baseline levels attributable to Turkey Point Nuclear operation were detected in the vicinity of PTN. The 2022 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program thus substantiated the adequacy of source control and effluent monitoring at Turkey Point Nuclear with no observed impact of plant operations on the environment.

Turkey Point Nuclear established the REMP prior to the stations becoming operational to provide data on background radiation and radioactivity normally present in the area. PTN has continued to monitor the environment by sampling air, water, sediment, crustacea, fish and broadleaf vegetation, as well as measuring direct radiation. PTN also samples milk if milk-producing animals used for human consumption are present within five miles (8 km) of the plant.

The REMP includes sampling indicator and control locations within an approximate 20-mile radius of the plant. The REMP utilizes indicator locations near the site to show any increases or buildup of radioactivity that might occur due to station operation and control locations farther away from the site to indicate the presence of only naturally occurring radioactivity. PTN personnel compare indicator results with control results to assess any impact PTN operation might have had on the surrounding environment.

In 2022, environmental samples were collected for radiological analysis. The results of indicator locations were compared with control locations. It was concluded that no significant relationship exists between PTN operation and effect on the area around the plant. The review of 2022 data showed radioactivity levels in the environment were undetectable in many locations and near background levels in significant pathways.

Radiological environmental monitoring for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, DOH. Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel. Samples are analyzed at the DOH Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida. The 2022 Radiological Surveillance Quarterly Report data is provided by the State of Florida Bureau of Radiation Control and is presented in Attachment 2. The State of Florida is not involved in the (Industry Initiative) ground water monitoring program.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 6 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1.2 Reporting Levels No samples equaled or exceeded reporting levels.

1.3 Sample Deviations During 2022, environmental sampling was performed for seven media types addressed in the ODCM and for direct radiation. A total of 770 samples of the 802 scheduled were obtained. Of the scheduled samples, 96 percent were collected and analyzed in accordance with the requirements specified in the ODCM. Attachment 1 contains the listing of sample deviations and actions taken.

1.4 Program Modifications

There were no program modifications during the reporting period.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 7 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

2.0 INTRODUCTION

This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated. This report covers surveillance activities described in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) meeting the requirements of Unit 3 and Unit 4 Technical Specifications.

2.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the Turkey Point Plant is conducted pursuant to Control 5.1 of Turkey Point Unit 3 & 4 ODCM.

A. Purpose The purpose of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation.

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:

Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 23 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.

Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at six locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

Surface water samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

Shoreline sediment samples are collected from three locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations coinciding with two of the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 8 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table 1 through 4 provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types, and frequencies.

Note: Ground Water Protection, NEI Initiative: The program and results are described in Attachment 4.

2.2 Pathways Monitored The airborne, direct radiation, waterborne and ingestion pathways are monitored as required by Control 5.1 of Turkey Point Unit 3 & 4 ODCM. A description of the REMP utilized to monitor the exposure pathways is described in the attached Tables and Figures.

Section 4.0 of this report provides a discussion of 2022 sampling results with Section 5.0 providing a summary of results for the monitored exposure pathways.

2.3 Land Use Census PTN conducts a land use census, as required by Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 ODCM.

The purpose of this census is to identify changes in uses of land within five miles of PTN that would require modifications to the REMP and the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). Section 4.5 on the report contains a narrative on the results of the 2022 land use census.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 9 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 3.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Table 1: Exposure Pathway - Airborne Sample Point Description Sampling and Collection Requirement Type and Frequency Of Analyses Distance and Direction Frequency RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES

T51 (2 mi. NNW) - Entrance Area to Biscayne National Park.

5 sample indicator locations and 1 sample control location.

T57 (4 mi. NW) - Siren Pole 27, intersection of SW 112th Ave and SW 304th St.

T58 (1 mi. NW) - Turkey Point

Radioiodine Canisters - I-131 analysis weekly.

Entrance Road. Continuous sampler operation with sample collection weekly or

Air Particulate - Gross beta radioactivity analysis

T72 (<1 mi. WSW) - Just before more frequently if required by following filter change.

entrance to Land Utilizations dust loading.

access gate.

Air Particulate - Gamma Isotopic analysis quarterly.

T41 (1.6 mi. WNW) - Palm Dr.

West of FPL Satellite School near the site boundary.

T64* (22 mi. NNE) - Natoma Substation, 2475 SW 16 Ct.

Denotes Control sample

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 10 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table 2: Exposure Pathway - Direct Radiation Sample Point Description Distance Sampling and Requirement Type and Frequency Of Analyses and Direction Collection Frequency TLDS

N-2 (2 mi N) - Convoy Point 22 indicator sample locations and 1 control

N-7 (7.1 mi N) - Black Point Marina Quarterly

mR exposure quarterly.

sample location. parking lot on siren pole

N-10 (10.6 mi N) - Old Cutler Rd across from Perdue Med. Ctr. On siren pole.

NNW-2 (2.2 mi NNW) - East End of N. Canal Dr. on siren pole E. of 117th Ave.

NNW-10 (9.2 mi NNW) - Bailes Rd.

E. of US 1 on siren pole.

NW-1 (1.4 mi NW) - Turkey Point Entrance Rd.

NW-5 (3.9 mi NW) - Intersection of Mowry Dr. and 117th Ave. on siren pole.

NW-10 (10 mi NW) - On Newtown Rd. N. of Coconut Palm Drive on siren pole.

W-5 (5.3 mi W) - Palm Drive 0.3 mi west of Tallahassee Rd.

WNW-10 (9.8 mi WNW) - NW 2nd Ave. S. of Campbell Dr. at Hmstd.

Middle School on siren pole.

W-1 (0.7 mi W) - On site north side of Discharge Canal.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 11 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table 2: Exposure Pathway - Direct Radiation Sample Point Description Distance Sampling and Requirement Type and Frequency Of Analyses and Direction Collection Frequency TLDS (Contd)

W-9 (8.6 mi W) - Card Sound Rd. 0.6 mi SSE of US 1 on siren pole.

22 indicator sample locations and 1 control Quarterly

mR exposure quarterly.

sample location.

WSW-8 (7.8 mi WSW) - Card Sound Rd. 3.4 mi. SSE of US 1 on siren Pole.

SW-1 (1 mi SW) - On site near land utilization offices.

SSE-1 (1 mi SSE) - On site South East side of cooling canals at Turtle Point.

SW-8 (8 mi SW) - Card Sound Rd. 5 mi. SSE of US 1 at entrance to Navy facility.

SSW-5 (5 mi SSW) - On site, southwest corner of cooling canals.

SSW-10 (10 mi SSW) - At Card Sound Bridge on siren pole.

S-5 (5 mi S) - On site, south east end of cooling canals.

S-10 (10 mi S) - Card Sound Road at Steamboat Creek.

SSE-10 (9 mi SSE) - Ocean Reef.

NNE-22* (22.6 mi NNE) - Natoma Substation.

WNW2 (1.6 mi WNW) - Palm Dr.

West of FPL Satellite School, near Site Boundary.

Denotes Control sample

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 12 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table 3: Exposure Pathway - Waterborne Sample Point Description Distance Sampling and Requirement Type and Frequency Of Analyses and Direction Collection Frequency

T42 (<1 mi. ENE) - Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point.

SURFACE WATER Grab samples Monthly

Gamma isotopic analysis and tritium analysis

T81 (6 mi. S) - Card Sound, near monthly.

2 indicator sample locations and 1 control Mouth of Old Discharge Canal.

sample location.

T67* (13-18 mi. N, NNE) - Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park SEDIMENT FROM SHORELINE

T42 (<1 mi ENE) - Biscayne Bay at Turkey Point.

2 indicator sample locations and 1 control Semi-annually

Gamma isotopic analysis semi-annually.

sample location. Locations coincide with the

T81 (6 mi. S) - Card Sound, near surface water sample locations. Mouth of Old Discharge Canal.

T67* (13-18 mi. N, NNE) - Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park

Denotes Control sample

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 13 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Denotes Control sample Table 4: Exposure Pathway - Ingestion Sample Point Description Distance Sampling and Collection Requirement Type and Frequency Of Analyses and Direction Frequency CRUSTACEA AND FISH

T81 (6 mi. S) - Card Sound, near Mouth of Old Discharge Canal.

1 indicator sample location and 1 control Semi-annually Gamma isotopic analysis semi-annually.

sample location.

T67* (13-18 mi. N, NNE) - Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park BROADLEAF VEGATATION

T40 (3 mi W) - South of Palm Dr. on S.W. 117th Street Extension.

2 indicator sample locations and 1 control Monthly Gamma isotopic analysis monthly.

sample location.

T41 (2 mi WNW) - Palm Dr. West of FPL Satellite School near the site boundary.

T67* (13-18 mi. N, NNE) - Near Biscayne Bay, Vicinity of Cutler Plant, North to Matheson Hammock Park

Denotes Control sample

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 14 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Figure 1: Sample Collection Sites - Near Station

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 15 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Figure 2: Sample Collection Sites - Distant from Station

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 16 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 4.0 INTERPRETATION AND TRENDS OF RESULTS 4.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results In 2022 there were no samples above the LLD for I-131. Indicator gross beta air particulate results for 2022 were comparable to results obtained from 2019-2021 of the operational REMP. Results are reported in picocuries per cubic meter (pCi/m3).

Monitoring Period Result 2019 - 2021 (Minimum Value) 0.002 2022 Average Value 0.013 2019 - 2021 (Maximum Value) 0.030 Gross beta activity is attributed to naturally occurring radionuclides. Table 6, which include gross beta concentrations and provide a comparison of the indicator and control means and ranges emphasizes the consistent trends seen in this pathway to support the presence of naturally occurring activity. Figure 3 is a comparison of the weekly Gross Beta results for 2022.Therefore, it can be concluded that the airborne pathway continues to be unaffected by Turkey Point Nuclear operations.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 17 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 4.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (TLD) Sample Results Turkey Point Nuclear reports relies on comparison of the indicator locations to the control as a measure of plant impact. Turkey Point Nuclears comparison of the indicator to the control, as seen in Table 6, identified no noticeable trend that would indicate that the ambient radiation levels are being affected by plant operations. In addition, the quarterly indicator averages shown in the TLD radiation dose comparison graph below shows the 2022 indicator results are comparable to control location results. Overall, Turkey Point Nuclear concluded that the ambient radiation levels are not being affected by plant operations.

4.3 Waterborne Sample Results Analytical results for 2022 surface water samples were similar to those reported in previous years. Gamma radionuclides and tritium analytical results for 2022 waterborne samples were below the ODCM-required LLD similar to those reported in previous years. These results are further explained below.

4.3.1 Surface Water Results Samples were collected from two indicator and one control location and analyzed for gamma radionuclides and tritium. Tritium was detected in 1 out of 24 indicator location samples with a concentration of 84 pCi/L which is consistent with results seen in previous operational years. There were no plant related gamma radionuclides detected in any of the control or indicator location samples. Therefore, the operation of Turkey Point Nuclear had no definable impact on this waterborne pathway during 2022.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 18 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 4.3.2 Shoreline Sediment Sample Results Sediment samples were collected from two indicators and one control location in 2022 and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. Plant related gamma radionuclides were below the LLD limits at both indicator and control locations. Turkey Point Nuclear operations had no significant impact on the environment or public by this waterborne pathway.

4.4 Ingestion Sample Results 4.4.1 Crustacea and Fish Sample Results Crustacea and Fish samples were collected from one indicator and one control location and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. In 2022, gamma radionuclides were below detectable limits which are consistent with the results seen in previously operational years. Therefore, based on these measurements, Turkey Point Nuclear operations had no significant radiological impact upon the environment or public by this ingestion pathway.

4.4.2 Broad Leaf Vegetation Sample Results The REMP had detected radionuclides prior to 1990 in vegetation that are attributable to other sources. These include the radioactive plume release due to reactor core degradation at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1986 and atmospheric weapons testing.

In 2022, Broad Leaf Vegetation samples were collected from two indicator and one control locations and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. The 2022 Cs-137 was detected in samples collected from the indicator and control locations. This activity identified could be from weapons fallout testing 30-40 years ago and reactor accidents at Chernobyl and are contributors. Therefore, based on these measurements, Turkey Point Nuclear operations had no significant radiological impact upon the environment or public by this ingestion pathway.

4.5 Land Use Census Results The latest land use census (performed in 2022) did not identify any new locations that yielded a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than those currently calculated (see Table 5).

The land use census identified no changes in the new resident census.

There were no changes in the milk cows/goats or garden census in 2022.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 19 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table 5: Land Use Census -2022 Nearest Residence, Garden, and Milk Animal Within Five Miles SECTOR NEAREST NEAREST NEAREST RESIDENCE/BUSINESS GARDEN (A) MILK ANIMAL N 1.9 mi @ 349° *

1.98 mi @ 349° 2.0 mi @ 354° NNE * *

NE * *

ENE * *

E * *

ESE * *

SE * *

SSE * *

S * *

SSW * *

SW * *

WSW * *

W * *

WNW 1.7 mi @ 302° 4.5 mi @ 303°

3.7 mi @ 302° 6.0 mi @ 295° NW 3.6 mi @ 304° *

3.7 mi @ 311° 3.8 mi @ 316° 3.9 mi @ 314° NNW

4.4 mi @ 333° 4.4 mi @ 332° 4.7 mi @ 328° 4.7 mi @ 328° (A) - Only gardens with an estimated total area of 500 square feet, or more, and producing green leafy vegetables are considered.

- No suitable sites were located within a five-mile range.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 20 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TURKEY POINT RESIDENCE SURVEY RESULTS July 2022 Range Sector Bearing Nearest Residence/Business Location N (A) 1.9 miles Homestead Bayfront Park complex. Contact is Jim Wyath. Office 349° hours are 8:30 to 4:30, 7 days a week. Some occasional overnight recreational occupancy (up to 4 nights) on boats at the marina. Approximately 10 workers, 7 days a week, hours and numbers vary. Some summer weekends can see 1000+ visitors.

There is always someone here 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> with more workers in the summer than the rest of the year (February thru September have the highest peak of workers). LaPlaya restaurant is open at the park weekdays from 11 am to 8:30 pm with 8 to 10 employees.

Weekends open till 10 pm and may have up to 15 employees.

N25° 27.683 W80° 20.200.

N (B) 1.98 miles South Glade Outfitters. Located on opposite side of building from 349° office of Homestead Bayfront Park. Manager is Robert and have 2-3 employees. Weekdays 7 am to 5 pm, Fridays till 6 pm.

Weekends 7 am - 6 pm. Hours may vary depending on weather.

N25° 27.767 W80° 20.206.

N (C) 2.0 miles Biscayne National Park at Convoy Point. Open 7 am to 5:30 pm 354° everyday. There are 65 employees including volunteers and individuals at the institute. The one ranger and two seasonal employees are there all year. There are about 500,000 visitors (more including boaters) per year. Contacts include: Michelle Penick, Chief of Facilities, J. Ernest Jutte, Chief of Administration, 305-242-7721 (office) 202-438-6636 (mobile), and Cindy Holl (administrator) 239-695-1114. N25° 27.817 W80° 20.067.

NNE No residences were located within a five-mile range.

NE No residences were located within a five-mile range.

ENE No residences were located within a five-mile range.

E No residences were located within a five-mile range.

ESE No residences were located within a five-mile range.

SE No residences were located within a five-mile range.

SSE No residences were located within a five-mile range.

S No residences were located within a five-mile range.

SSW No residences were located within a five-mile range.

SW No residences were located within a five-mile range.

WSW No residences were located within a five-mile range.

W No residences were located within a five-mile range.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 21 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TURKEY POINT RESIDENCE SURVEY RESULTS July 2022 (cont.)

Range Sector Bearing Nearest Residence/Business Location WNW (A) 1.7 miles FP&L daycare center and shooting range near the entrance to the 302° Turkey Point Plant. Contact is Yudisvel Judy Diaz, Director.

There are 15 employees with 90 children currently enrolled, ages 6 months to 5 yrs. Occasionally, they will have school aged children. The center is open from 6am to 6pm Monday thru Friday. The number of people and times at the shooting range varies. N25° 26.817 W80° 21.217.

3.7 miles 11790 Canal Drive on the south side of Canal Drive (SW 328 St)

WNW (B) 302° west of SW 117th Ave (no gardens). Next door, to the east, is a makeshift produce stand which sells coconuts, limes, mandarin oranges, flowers, garlic, mangoes, papaya, avocado, honey, melons, sugar cane, ginger, plantains and pumpkins. Is not associated with the house next door. Two employees may be working there from 8 am to 6 pm. N25° 27.767 W80° 22.867.

NW (A) 3.6 miles The Waste Management Homestead Landfill is located north of 304° Canal Drive (SW 328th St) and east of SW 117th Ave. There are 9 full time employees onsite Monday thru Friday from 7 am to 3:30 pm. N25° 27.833 W80° 22.767.

NW (B) 3.7 miles 11000 SW 320th St. Per property records, this house is on land 311° zoned agriculture and the owners live in Texas. Unable to verify if anyone lives there because the gate is locked and the residence is too far from the road to see anything. N25° 28.217 W80° 22.567.

NW (C) 3.8 miles High Hope Nursery at 11400 SW 316th St. Contact is George 316° Sprinkle, Owner and General Manager. This nursery has approximately 35 employees. Hours of operations are 7am to 5pm Monday thru Friday, with some work on Saturdays until noon. A man lives onsite providing security. N25° 28.441 W80° 22.430.

NW (D) 3.9 miles Snapper Creek Nursery at 11600 SW 316th Street. 14 workers 314° that work Monday thru Friday 7 am to 5 pm. Contact is Elmer.

Security is provided by another person who lives onsite.

N25° 28.444 W80° 22.560.

NNW (A) 4.4 miles 29800 SW 107th Ave. Per property records, this is a small one 333° bedroom residence on land zoned as mixed use agricultural. No information on occupants. N25° 29.450 W80° 21.817.

NNW (B) 4.7 miles Mirtica and Sons Dragon Fruit Farm. Entrance at the end of SW 328° 296th St. Contact is Ernesto Gonzalez Abreu. Owner lives off property in Miami.. N25° 29.564 W80° 22.264.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 22 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TURKEY POINT GARDEN SURVEY RESULTS July 2022 Range Nearest Garden Location (with estimated total area of 500 Sector Bearing square feet, or more, and producing green leafy vegetables).

N No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

NNE No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

NE No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

ENE No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

E No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

ESE No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

SE No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

SSE No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

S No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

SSW No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

SW No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

WSW No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

W No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 23 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TURKEY POINT GARDEN SURVEY RESULTS July 2022 (cont.)

Range Nearest Garden Location (with estimated total area of 500 Sector Bearing square feet, or more, and producing green leafy vegetables).

WNW (A) 4.5 miles Thai Farm. South of Mowry Drive (SW 320th St) and about 0.6 303° miles west of Allapattah Rd (SW 117th Ave). Growing guava, dragon fruit, papaya, palm, bamboo, and more. No one present.

N25° 28.217 W80° 23.467.

WNW (B) 6.0 miles Farm Share, Inc at 14125 SW 320th St, where farmers donate 295° locally grown produce to be given to charitable organizations.

Produce donations usually start in November and run through April.

About 20 workers present from 8 am to 4:30 pm Monday thru Friday. The produce donated is usually tomatoes, bananas, squash, green beans, okra, corn, potatoes, watermelon and zucchini.

N25° 28.255 W80° 25.111.

NW No suitable gardens were located within a five-mile range.

NNW (A) 4.4 miles Under the Vine. 11100 SW 296th St. Entrance at SW 107th Ave &

332° SW 296th St just east of SFM Tree Farm/Mirtica Farm. Growing only dragon fruit. Open Mon-Sat 8:00-5:00. 3 employees plus the owner, Cindy, work here. Sometimes they hire extra help. The owners brother, Pepper, sometimes spends the weekends onsite.

N25° 29.464 W80° 21.828.

NNW (B) 4.7 miles Now Mirtica and Sons Dragon Fruit Farm. Entrance at the end of 328° SW 296th St. Noticed bananas, dragon fruit, plantain tress, coconuts and mangoes growing in various areas on the farm.

Also noticed beehives. Owner lives off property in Miami.

N25° 29.564 W80° 22.264.

Note: At the time of our survey, many fields in the area surveyed were bare soil or cover crops. Other than the sites already described above, the only non-ornamental crops known to have been grown in the survey area were: bananas, beans, corn, guava, malanga, papaya, eggplant, sorghum, squash, sugar cane, tambis, okra, and melon.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 24 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report TURKEY POINT MILK ANIMAL SURVEY RESULTS July 2022 Sector Nearest Milk Animals (cows or goats).

N No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

NNE No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

NE No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

ENE No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

E No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

ESE No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

SE No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

SSE No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

S No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

SSW No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

SW No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

WSW No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

W No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

WNW No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

NW No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

NNW No potential milk animals were located within five miles.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 25 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 4.6 Interlaboratory Comparison Results Attachment 3 contains result summary for Interlaboratory Comparison Program for the Department of Energy Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).

These satisfied the requirement of Control 5.3 of the ODCM for the Interlaboratory Comparison Program.

5.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

1. Table 6, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary, summarizes data for the 2022 REMP program.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 26 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table 6: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Indicator Locations Control Number of Sample Type Type / Number Location(4) [Highest Mean (F)(3)

LLD (2)

Mean (F)(3) Locations Mean Non Routine (Units) of Analyses(1) Annual Mean] [Range]

[Range] (F)(3) [Range] Results(5)

GB / 296 0.01 0.0127 (243 / 260) T64 0.0135 (50 / 52) 0.0135 (50 / 52) 0

[0.003 - 0.024] (22 mi. NNE) [0.003 - 0.024] [0.003 - 0.024]

GS / 24 Be-7 -- 0.1076 (20 / 20) T58 0.1204 (4 / 4) 0.1082 (4 / 4) 0

[0.059 - 0.146] (1 mi. NW) [0.0837 - 0.146] [0.0829 - 0.135]

Air Particulate (pCi/m3)

K-40 -- < LLD N/A N/A < LLD 0 Cs-134 0.05 < LLD N/A N/A < LLD 0 Cs-137 0.06 < LLD N/A N/A < LLD 0 Pb-210 -- 0.009 (2 / 20) T58 0.0093 (1 / 4) < LLD 0

[0.0086 - 0.0093] (1 mi. NW) [<LLD - 0.0093]

Airborne Iodine I-131 / 296 0.07 < LLD N/A N/A < LLD 0 (pCi/m3)

Direct Radiation Gamma / 88 (6) 3.8 (88 / 88) NW-10 4.4 (4 / 4) N/A 0 Indicator TLD

[2.8 - 5.1] (10 mi NW) [3.4 - 5.1]

(µR/hour)

Direct Radiation Gamma / 4 (6)

N/A NNE-22 3.7 (4 / 4) 4 (4 / 4) 0 Control TLD (22.6 mi NNE) [3.1 - 4.4] [3.7 - 4.2]

(µR/hour)

LEGEND:

(1)

- GB = Gross beta; I-131 = Iodine-131; H-3 = Tritium; GS = Gamma scan.

(2)

- LLD = Required lower limit of detection based on Turkey Point ODCM.

(3)

- Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parenthesis (F).

(4)

- Locations are specified (1) by name and (2) direction relative to reactor site.

(5)

- Non-routine results are those which exceed ten times the control station value. If no control station value is available, the result is considered non-routine if it exceeds ten times the preoperational value for the location.

(6)

- LLD is not defined in Turkey Point ODCM.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 27 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table 6: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Indicator Locations Control Number of Sample Type Type / Number Location(4) [Highest Mean (F)(3)

LLD (2)

Mean (F)(3) Locations Mean Non Routine (Units) of Analyses(1) Annual Mean] [Range]

[Range] (F)(3) [Range] Results(5)

H-3 / 36 3,000 84 (1 / 24) T42 84 (1 / 12) < LLD 0

[<LLD - 84] (<1 mi. ENE) [<LLD - 84]

Surface Water GS / 36 (pCi/L)

K-40 -- 292 (24 / 24) T81 304 (12 / 12) 213 (12 / 12) 0

[193 - 398] (6 mi S) [237 - 386] [127 - 298]

GS / 6 Be-7 -- 80 (1 / 4) T67 116 (1 / 2) 116 (1 / 2) 0

[<LLD - 80] (13-18 mi N, NNE) [<LLD - 116] [<LLD - 116]

K-40 -- 170 (3 / 4) T67 382 (2 / 2) 382 (2 / 2) 0

[122 - 224] (13-18 mi N, NNE) [102 - 662] [102 - 662]

Cs-137 180 < LLD N/A N/A < LLD 0 Sediment Pb-210 -- < LLD N/A N/A < LLD 0 (pCi/kg dry)

Ra-226 -- 408 (4 / 4) T67 449 (1 / 2) 449 (1 / 2) 0

[332 - 487] (13-18 mi N, NNE) [<LLD - 449] [<LLD - 449]

Th-232 -- <LLD N/A N/A < LLD 0 U-235 -- 42 (3 / 4) T81 50 (2 / 2) 44 (1 / 2) 0

[24 - 75] (6 mi. S) [24 - 75] [<LLD - 44]

U-238 -- 179 (4 / 4) T67 563 (1 / 2) 563 (1 / 2) 0

[132 - 238] (13-18 mi N, NNE) [<LLD - 563] [<LLD - 563]

LEGEND:

(1)

- GB = Gross beta; I-131 = Iodine-131; H-3 = Tritium; GS = Gamma scan.

(2)

- LLD = Required lower limit of detection based on Turkey Point ODCM.

(3)

- Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parenthesis (F).

(4)

- Locations are specified (1) by name and (2) direction relative to reactor site.

(5)

- Non-routine results are those which exceed ten times the control station value. If no control station value is available, the result is considered non-routine if it exceeds ten times the preoperational value for the location.

(6)

- LLD is not defined in Turkey Point ODCM.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 28 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Table 6: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Indicator Locations Control Number of Sample Type Type / Number Location(4) [Highest Mean (F)(3)

LLD (2)

Mean (F)(3) Locations Mean Non Routine (Units) of Analyses(1) Annual Mean] [Range]

[Range] (F)(3) [Range] Results(5)

GS / 4 K-40 -- 1550 (2 / 2) T81 1550 (2 / 2) 1007 (2 / 2) 0 Crustacea [1460 - 1640] (6 mi. S) [1460 - 1640] [693 - 1320]

(pCi/kg wet)

Ra-226 -- <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Ra-228 -- <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 GS / 4 K-40 -- 2400 (2 / 2) T81 2400 (2 / 2) 2400 (2 / 2) 0 Fish (pCi/kg wet) [2150 - 2650] (6 mi. S) [2150 - 2650] [2230 - 2570]

Ra-226 -- < LLD N/A N/A < LLD 0 Ra-228 -- < LLD N/A N/A < LLD 0 GS / 36 Be-7 -- 1553 (24 / 24) T40 1741 (12 / 12) 1110 (12 / 12) 0

[579 - 3060] (3 mi W) [925 - 3060] [535 - 1830]

K-40 -- 4216 (24 / 24) T67 4733 (12 / 12) 4733 (12 / 12) 0

[2070 - 6350] (13-18 mi N, NNE) [3760 - 5680] [3760 - 5680]

Broad Leaf Cs-137 80 40. (13 / 24) T40 43 (10 / 12) <LLD 0 (pCi/kg wet) [10 - 117] (3 mi W) [10 - 117]

Pb-210 -- 408 (6 / 24) T41 716 (3 / 12) 384 (3 / 12) 0

[75 - 1610] (2 mi WNW) [75 - 1610] [47 - 562]

Pb-212 -- < LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Ra-226 -- 295 (1 / 12) T41 295 (1 / 12) 219 (1/12) 0

[<LLD - 295] (2 mi WNW) [<LLD - 295] [<LLD - 219]

LEGEND:

(1)

- GB = Gross beta; I-131 = Iodine-131; H-3 = Tritium; GS = Gamma scan.

(2)

- LLD = Required lower limit of detection based on Turkey Point ODCM.

(3)

- Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parenthesis (F).

(4)

- Locations are specified (1) by name and (2) direction relative to reactor site.

(5)

- Non-routine results are those which exceed ten times the control station value. If no control station value is available, the result is considered non-routine if it exceeds ten times the preoperational value for the location.

(6)

- LLD is not defined in Turkey Point ODCM.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 29 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 1 Page 1 of 2 Sample Deviations Table 7: Sample Deviations Table Sample Comment Sample Media Date Problem Evaluation / Actions No. Location Affected During routine sampling at locations ENE-1, it was discovered that the TLD was 1 TLD ENE-1 2nd Qtr. Sample Missing missing. Replacement TLD was installed. AR# 02444644 During routine sampling at locations NW-8, it was discovered that the TLD was 2 TLD NW-8 2nd Qtr. Sample Missing missing. Replacement TLD was installed. AR# 02444644 Vacuum pump was replaced on June 7, 2022. The sample pump was replaced 3 Air Sample T57 06/07/22 Pump Failure and then returned to service upon recognition of the failing pump. AR# 02444644 Power outage at station T72. The power was restored for weekly collection on 4 Air Sample T72 06/21/22 Power Outage June 21, 2022. AR# 02430654 T41 Sample Points T41, T51, T57, T58, T64 & T72-(Radioiodine and Particulates)

T51 From August 8th - August 12, 2022; These samples were collected and shipped T57 via FedEx by the BRC technician for Turkey Point Nuclear to their laboratory in Samples Lost in 5 Air Samples 08/12/22 Orlando. During transit, the package was damaged, and the filters were lost. The T58 Shipping iodine cartridges were not lost and were not analyzed by the lab. The technician T64 reached out numerous times to FedEx to find the filters, but they were unsuccessful. AR# 02444649/AR# 02456863 T72 T41 T51 Sample Points T41, T51, T57, T58, T64 & T72- (Radioiodine and Particulates) from September 26 - September 30, 2022: These samples were not collected T57 Samples Lost in during the assigned week. They were collected the following week without 6 Air Samples 09/30/22 T58 Shipping incident. The reason for the missed collection was that the BRC technician assigned to Turkey Point resigned unexpectedly and no one was able to collect T64 the samples in a timely fashion. AR# 02444649 T72

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 30 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 1 Page 2 of 2 Sample Deviations Table 7: Sample Deviations Table Sample Comment Sample Media Date Problem Evaluation / Actions No. Location Affected As part of the FPL Miami-Dade Clean Water Recovery Project, two of the sites 7 Groundwater 6s and 6d 4th Qtr. Relocation groundwater monitoring wells were abandoned to avoid damage during CWRC construction. AR# 02438187 Sample Goat milk sample was unavailable this year. The farm has not had any milking 8 Milk T99 2022 Unavailable goats. AR# 02447728

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 31 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report ATTACHMENT 2 Monitoring Results Tables RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT SITE 2022 First Quarter, 2022 Second Quarter, 2022 Third Quarter, 2022 Fourth Quarter, 2022

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 2022 Page 32 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 1 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 8: Air Particulate - Gross Beta Analysis: Gross Beta Units: pCi/m3 T41 T51 T57 T58 T64 End Date T72(1) (Indicator)

(Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Control)

LLD 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 01/06/2022 0.014 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.018 01/12/2022 0.014 0.013 0.018 0.018 0.020 0.016 01/19/2022 0.021 0.014 0.024 0.016 0.015 0.018 01/27/2022 0.009 0.015 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.014 02/02/2022 0.016 0.010 0.016 0.017 0.015 0.014 02/09/2022 0.011 0.013 0.013 0.014 0.011 0.008 02/15/2022 0.017 0.018 0.014 0.021 0.019 0.014 02/24/2022 0.012 0.013 0.012 0.014 0.012 0.016 03/02/2022 0.004 0.011 < 0.183 0.005 0.006 0.010 03/07/2022 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.016 0.010 0.009 03/16/2022 0.005 0.007 0.008 0.010 0.010 0.009 03/23/2022 0.012 0.013 0.009 0.012 0.012 0.009 03/30/2022 0.021 0.017 0.020 0.018 0.020 0.020 04/05/2022 0.012 0.013 0.015 0.016 0.015 0.014 04/13/2022 0.015 0.013 0.013 0.012 0.018 0.014 04/19/2022 0.008 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.007 0.007 04/27/2022 0.013 0.016 0.017 0.014 0.013 0.015 05/02/2022 0.010 0.016 0.017 0.011 0.012 0.015 05/11/2022 0.015 0.013 0.011 0.014 0.011 0.014 05/17/2022 0.011 0.010 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.010 05/24/2022 0.017 0.024 0.012 0.014 0.020 0.011 (3) 05/31/2022 0.020 0.018 0.012 0.021 0.019 (3) 06/06/2022 0.005 0.003 0.005 0.008 0.003 (2) (3) 06/14/2022 0.012 0.013 0.010 0.014 0.013 (3) 06/21/2022 0.011 0.023 0.017 0.018 0.019 06/27/2022 0.017 0.020 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.017 07/04/2022 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.012 0.006 0.010 07/12/2022 0.009 0.013 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.011 07/19/2022 0.007 0.013 0.011 0.014 0.013 0.016 07/26/2022 0.011 0.017 0.012 0.018 0.014 0.015 08/01/2022 0.013 0.012 0.015 0.012 0.012 0.014 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) 08/09/2022 08/16/2022 0.021 0.014 0.015 0.013 0.020 0.023 08/23/2022 0.010 0.011 0.006 0.011 0.017 0.011 09/06/2022 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.008 0.007 09/14/2022 0.004 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.004 09/20/2022 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.015 09/26/2022 0.019 0.019 0.017 0.020 0.022 0.023 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) 09/30/2022 10/04/2022 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.005 0.004 10/11/2022 0.016 0.013 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.012 10/19/2022 0.010 0.010 0.013 0.011 0.016 0.013 10/25/2022 0.015 0.016 0.015 0.017 0.021 0.019 10/31/2022 0.010 0.016 0.010 0.010 0.014 0.014 11/09/2022 0.010 0.015 0.010 0.011 0.013 0.009 11/15/2022 0.006 0.005 0.008 0.006 0.009 < 0.002 11/21/2022 0.006 0.005 0.008 0.007 0.011 < 0.002 11/30/2022 0.011 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.011 12/06/2022 0.009 0.015 0.013 0.013 0.016 0.013 12/13/2022 0.015 0.017 0.018 0.018 0.013 0.016 12/21/2022 0.010 0.016 0.023 0.013 0.024 0.013 12/27/2022 0.019 0.016 0.019 0.016 0.022 0.016 (1)

Station with highest annual mean.

(2)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 3 (3)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 4 (4)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 5 (5)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 6

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 33 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 2 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 9: Air Particulate Composite - Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/m3 Location Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 REQUIRED LLD -- -- 0.05 0.06 --

T41 (Indicator) 03/30/2022 0.1330 < 0.0133 < 0.0011 < 0.0008 0.0086 T51 (Indicator) 03/30/2022 0.1150 < 0.0147 < 0.0009 < 0.0008 < 0.0330 T57 (Indicator) 03/30/2022 0.1270 < 0.0146 < 0.0011 < 0.0010 < 0.0145 T58 (Indicator) 03/30/2022 0.1460 < 0.0133 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0093 T64 (Control) 03/30/2022 0.1350 < 0.0143 < 0.0010 < 0.0008 < 0.0143 T72 (Indicator) 03/30/2022 0.1300 < 0.0163 < 0.0010 < 0.0008 < 0.0327 T41 (Indicator) 06/27/2022 0.1410 < 0.0211 < 0.0010 < 0.0011 < 0.0355 T51 (Indicator) 06/27/2022 0.0996 < 0.0134 < 0.0012 < 0.0011 < 0.0121 T57 (Indicator) 06/27/2022 0.1220 < 0.0149 < 0.0011 < 0.0007 < 0.0351 T58 (Indicator) 06/27/2022 0.1400 < 0.0130 < 0.0014 < 0.0009 < 0.0113 T64 (Control) 06/27/2022 0.1150 < 0.0173 < 0.0011 < 0.0010 < 0.0334 T72 (Indicator) 06/27/2022 0.1210 < 0.0217 < 0.0019 < 0.0014 < 0.0161 T41 (Indicator) 09/30/2022 0.0590 < 0.0126 < 0.0010 < 0.0009 < 0.0096 T51 (Indicator) 09/30/2022 0.0849 < 0.0127 < 0.0010 < 0.0009 < 0.0306 T57 (Indicator) 09/30/2022 0.0709 < 0.0127 < 0.0010 < 0.0009 < 0.0095 T58 (Indicator) 09/30/2022 0.0837 < 0.0150 < 0.0007 < 0.0008 < 0.0310 T64 (Control) 09/30/2022 0.0829 < 0.0125 < 0.0008 < 0.0008 < 0.0105 T72 (Indicator) 09/30/2022 0.0664 < 0.0126 < 0.0011 < 0.0010 < 0.0110 T41 (Indicator) 12/28/2022 0.0801 < 0.0155 < 0.0008 < 0.0007 < 0.0324 T51 (Indicator) 12/28/2022 0.1120 < 0.0172 < 0.0009 < 0.0009 < 0.0095 T57 (Indicator) 12/28/2022 0.1080 < 0.0107 < 0.0007 < 0.0009 < 0.0275 T58 (Indicator) 12/28/2022 0.1120 < 0.0222 < 0.0008 < 0.0010 < 0.0072 T64 (Control) 12/28/2022 0.1000 < 0.0121 < 0.0006 < 0.0008 < 0.0325 T72 (Indicator) 12/28/2022 0.1010 < 0.0194 < 0.0008 < 0.0008 < 0.0056 (2)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 3 (3)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 4 (4)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 5 (5)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 6

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 34 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 3 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 10: Air Cartridges - Iodine-131 Analysis: Iodine-131 Units: pCi/m3 T41 T51 T57 T58 T64 T72 End Date (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

LLD 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 01/06/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 01/12/2022 < 0.020 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.030 < 0.030 01/19/2022 < 0.010 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.020 01/27/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 02/02/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 02/09/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 02/15/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 02/24/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 03/02/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.690 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 03/07/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 03/16/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 03/23/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 03/30/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 04/05/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 04/13/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 04/19/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.030 04/27/2022 < 0.020 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 05/02/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 05/11/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 05/17/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 05/24/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.080 (3) 05/31/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 (3) 06/06/2022 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 (2) (3) 06/14/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.030 (3) 06/21/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 06/27/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 07/04/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 07/12/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.030 < 0.030 07/19/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 07/26/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 08/01/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) 08/09/2022 08/16/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 08/23/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.030 09/06/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 09/14/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.030 09/20/2022 < 0.020 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 09/26/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) 09/30/2022 10/04/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 10/11/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 10/19/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 10/25/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 10/31/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 11/09/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 11/15/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.030 11/21/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 11/30/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 12/06/2022 < 0.030 < 0.040 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 12/13/2022 < 0.020 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.020 < 0.010 < 0.020 12/21/2022 < 0.010 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 12/27/2022 < 0.030 < 0.020 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 < 0.030 (2)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 3 (3)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 4 (4)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 5 (5)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 6

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 35 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 4 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 11: Direct Radiation- Indicators Analysis: Gamma Dose Units: µR/hr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Annual Mean Station 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 N-2 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.9 4.2 N-7 4.1 3.5 4.4 3.4 3.9 N-10 4.5 3.9 4.3 3.7 4.1 NNW-2 4.2 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.9 NNW-10 4.3 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.9 NW-1 4.7 4.2 3.7 3.7 4.1 NW-5 4.0 3.3 4.1 3.9 3.8 (1)

NW-10 5.1 4.7 4.2 3.4 4.4 WNW-2 4.3 3.9 3.6 3.8 3.9 WNW-10 4.7 4.3 3.5 3.5 4.0 W-1 4.6 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.2 W-5 4.3 3.8 4.5 3.4 4.0 W-9 3.9 3.5 3.9 3.5 3.7 WSW-8 4.0 3.6 4.0 3.9 3.9 SW-1 4.3 4.0 4.2 4.0 4.1 SW-8 3.1 3.1 4.4 3.9 3.6 SSW-5 3.6 3.2 4.1 3.7 3.6 SSW-10 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.7 S-5 3.2 3.2 3.9 3.1 3.4 S-10 4.2 3.7 3.2 3.4 3.6 SSE-1 3.5 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.5 SSE-10 3.5 3.3 3.9 2.8 3.4 (1)

Indicator station with highest annual mean.

Table 12: Direct Radiation - Control Analysis: Gamma Dose Units: µR/hr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Annual Mean Station 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 NNE-22 4.4 4.2 3.1 3.1 3.7

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 36 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 5 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 13: Surface Water - Tritium and Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/L Location End Date H-3 K-40 Location End Date H-3 K-40 Location End Date H-3 K-40 REQUIRED LLD 3,000 -- REQUIRED LLD 3,000 -- REQUIRED LLD 3,000 --

T42 T67 T81 01/20/2022 < 137 193 01/19/2022 < 137 269 01/20/2022 < 133 339 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 02/15/2022 84 224 02/14/2022 < 131 282 02/15/2022 < 131 237 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 03/08/2022 < 135 218 03/07/2022 < 135 171 03/08/2022 < 135 252 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 04/05/2022 < 132 304 04/04/2022 < 132 248 04/05/2022 < 132 253 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 05/03/2022 < 139 364 05/02/2022 < 134 298 05/03/2022 < 139 386 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 06/06/2022 < 132 260 06/06/2022 < 132 163 06/06/2022 < 132 309 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 07/05/2022 < 135 243 07/06/2022 < 135 127 07/05/2022 < 135 347 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 08/02/2022 < 137 398 08/03/2022 < 137 194 08/02/2022 < 137 334 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 09/07/2022 < 136 378 09/06/2022 < 133 170 09/07/2022 < 136 342 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 10/04/2022 < 131 222 10/04/2022 < 131 216 10/04/2022 < 131 274 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 11/01/2022 < 129 292 10/31/2022 < 129 149 11/01/2022 < 129 296 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

T42 T67 T81 12/13/2022 < 134 251 12/14/2022 < 134 268 12/13/2022 < 134 284 (Indicator) (Control) (Indicator)

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 37 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 6 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 14: Shoreline Sediment - Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg (dry)

Location Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Th-232 U-235 U-238 REQUIRED LLD -- -- 180 -- -- -- -- --

T42 (Indicator) 01/20/2022 80 < 140 <9 < 322 425 < 39 27 132 T67 (Control) 01/20/2022 116 102 < 10 < 533 449 < 42 44 563 T81 (Indicator) 01/20/2022 < 67 122 <8 < 382 386 < 64 24 133 T42 (Indicator) 07/05/2022 < 121 164 < 10 < 1050 332 < 46 < 23 211 T67 (Control) 07/06/2022 < 93 662 <9 < 838 < 41 < 63 < 18 < 201 T81 (Indicator) 07/05/2022 < 140 224 < 11 < 1060 487 < 52 75 238

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 38 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 7 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 15: Crustacea - Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg (wet)

Collection Location Sample Type K-40 Ra-226 Ra-228 Date REQUIRED LLD -- -- --

T67 (Control) 05/04/2022 Blue Crab 693 < 253 < 69 T81 (Indicator) 05/03/2022 Blue Crab 1460 < 367 < 75 T67 (Control) 11/01/2022 Blue Crab 1320 < 567 < 1320 T81 (Indicator) 11/02/2022 Blue Crab 1640 < 464 < 1640

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 39 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 8 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 16: Fish - Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg (wet)

Collection Location Sample Type K-40 Ra-226 Ra-228 Date REQUIRED LLD -- -- --

Mixed T67 (Control) 04/06/2022 2570 < 23 < 475 Species Mixed T81 (Indicator) 04/05/2022 2650 < 343 < 72 Species Mixed T67 (Control) 07/06/2022 2230 < 337 < 57 Species Mixed T81 (Indicator) 07/05/2022 2150 < 490 < 88 Species

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 40 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 9 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 17: Broad Leaf Vegetation - Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg (wet)

Collection Location Sample Type Be-7 K-40 Cs-137 Pb-210 Pb-212 Ra-226 Date REQUIRED LLD -- -- 80 -- -- --

T40 (Indicator) 01/19/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1210 3640 22 < 110 < 18 < 214 T40 (Indicator) 02/14/2022 Brazilian Pepper 3060 4220 117 84 < 24 < 270 T40 (Indicator) 03/07/2022 Brazilian Pepper 2450 5260 46 125 < 19 < 227 T40 (Indicator) 04/04/2022 Brazilian Pepper 2150 2790 80 < 829 < 26 < 337 T40 (Indicator) 05/03/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1660 2440 10 89 < 16 < 208 T40 (Indicator) 06/06/2022 Brazilian Pepper 925 4650 < 13 < 95 < 23 < 257 T40 (Indicator) 07/06/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1240 3940 46 < 715 < 22 < 258 T40 (Indicator) 08/03/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1840 3870 14 < 657 < 22 < 264 T40 (Indicator) 09/07/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1490 3890 43 < 1050 < 36 < 438 T40 (Indicator) 10/04/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1750 5810 < 12 < 95 < 22 < 239 T40 (Indicator) 11/01/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1810 4540 39 < 667 < 24 < 268 T40 (Indicator) 12/13/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1310 6100 13 < 102 < 24 < 274 T41(Indicator) 01/18/2022 Brazilian Pepper 825 4660 < 13 < 267 < 21 < 247 T41(Indicator) 02/14/2022 Brazilian Pepper 2660 6350 28 < 137 < 25 < 291 T41(Indicator) 03/07/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1690 3160 < 11 75 < 20 < 229 T41(Indicator) 04/04/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1150 2070 < 11 < 99 < 19 < 212 T41(Indicator) 05/03/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1500 5900 < 16 < 130 < 23 < 268 T41(Indicator) 06/06/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1420 2830 < 11 < 886 < 24 < 370 T41(Indicator) 07/06/2022 Brazilian Pepper 579 3390 <9 < 624 < 21 < 244 T41(Indicator) 08/02/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1170 4050 < 11 463 < 20 < 271 T41(Indicator) 09/07/2022 Brazilian Pepper 723 3780 < 16 < 849 < 21 < 366 T41(Indicator) 10/04/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1880 4200 45 1610 < 36 295 T41(Indicator) 11/01/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1230 4060 20 < 81 < 18 < 227 T41(Indicator) 12/13/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1550 5590 < 19 < 1100 < 35 < 431 T67 (Control) 01/19/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1060 5090 < 9 47 < 15 < 181 T67 (Control) 02/14/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1140 5340 < 11 < 303 < 21 < 238 T67 (Control) 03/07/2022 Brazilian Pepper 535 5270 < 16 544 < 29 < 350 T67 (Control) 04/04/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1830 4920 < 14 < 1230 < 27 < 300 T67 (Control) 05/02/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1300 5680 < 16 < 240 < 30 < 348 T67 (Control) 06/06/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1290 4670 < 13 562 < 27 < 329 T67 (Control) 07/06/2022 Brazilian Pepper 641 3760 < 9 < 67 < 15 < 187 T67 (Control) 08/03/2022 Brazilian Pepper 790 3780 < 9 < 587 < 20 219 T67 (Control) 09/06/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1100 4660 < 7 < 86 < 19 < 234 T67 (Control) 10/04/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1270 4600 < 13 < 95 < 22 < 238 T67 (Control) 10/31/2022 Brazilian Pepper 1410 4580 < 17 < 1190 < 32 < 382 T67 (Control) 12/14/2022 Brazilian Pepper 954 4450 < 14 < 685 < 22 < 254

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 41 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 10 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 18: Supplemental Direct Radiation- Indicators Analysis: Gamma Dose Units: µR/hr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Annual Mean Station 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 NNW-6 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 NW-7 4.8 4.1 3.5 3.8 4.1 (1) (2)

NW-8 4.9 4.1 3.5 4.2 WNW-3 4.2 3.9 4.0 3.5 3.9 WNW-6 4.1 4.0 4.2 3.9 4.0 W-8 4.4 3.9 3.9 3.7 4.0 (3)

ENE-1 3.3 3.2 3.0 3.1 T72 4.0 3.6 3.7 3.4 3.7 PTN-1 4.0 3.8 4.0 3.5 3.8 (1)

Indicator station with highest annual mean.

(2)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 2 (3)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 1

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 42 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 11 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 19: Supplemental Air Particulate - Gross Beta Analysis: Gross Beta Units: pCi/m3 End Date T52 (Indicator) T56 (Indicator)

LLD 0.01 0.01 01/06/2022 0.013 0.016 01/12/2022 0.014 0.014 01/19/2022 0.016 0.018 01/27/2022 0.015 0.014 02/02/2022 0.021 0.017 02/09/2022 0.011 0.012 02/15/2022 0.017 0.018 02/24/2022 0.013 0.012 03/02/2022 0.009 0.010 03/07/2022 0.012 0.012 03/16/2022 0.007 0.006 03/23/2022 0.011 0.013 03/30/2022 0.019 0.019 04/05/2022 0.014 0.011 04/13/2022 0.014 0.019 04/19/2022 0.008 0.008 04/27/2022 0.014 0.015 05/02/2022 0.009 0.010 05/11/2022 0.014 0.014 05/17/2022 0.010 0.012 05/24/2022 0.021 0.022 05/31/2022 0.021 0.023 06/06/2022 < 0.001 0.005 06/14/2022 0.012 0.011 06/21/2023 0.016 0.011 06/27/2023 0.015 0.018 07/04/2022 0.007 0.008 07/12/2022 0.011 0.009 07/19/2022 0.011 0.012 07/26/2022 0.012 0.013 08/01/2022 0.012 0.013 (1) (1) 08/09/2022 08/16/2022 0.017 0.015 08/23/2022 0.009 0.011 09/06/2022 0.007 0.002 09/14/2022 0.006 0.005 09/20/2022 0.009 0.008 09/26/2022 0.021 0.015 (2) (2) 09/30/2022 10/04/2022 0.005 0.005 10/11/2022 0.011 0.008 10/19/2022 0.009 0.011 10/25/2022 0.014 0.019 10/31/2022 0.011 0.011 11/09/2022 0.012 0.012 11/15/2022 0.009 0.010 11/21/2022 0.009 0.010 11/30/2022 0.007 0.011 12/06/2022 0.017 0.013 12/13/2022 0.017 0.015 12/21/2022 0.012 0.020 12/27/2022 0.023 0.016 (1)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 5 (2)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 6

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 43 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 12 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 20: Supplemental Air Particulate Composite - Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/m3 Location Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 REQUIRED LLD -- -- 0.05 0.06 --

T52 (Indicator) 03/30/2022 0.1380 < 0.0146 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0153 T56 (Indicator) 03/30/2022 0.1230 < 0.0149 < 0.0009 < 0.0007 < 0.0333 T52 (Indicator) 06/14/2022 0.1240 < 0.0169 < 0.0011 < 0.0010 < 0.0329 T56 (Indicator) 06/14/2022 0.1290 < 0.0079 < 0.0014 < 0.0010 < 0.0114 T52 (Indicator) 09/26/2022 0.0633 < 0.0153 < 0.0013 < 0.0011 < 0.0109 T56 (Indicator) 09/26/2022 0.0633 < 0.0153 < 0.0013 < 0.0011 < 0.0109 T52 (Indicator) 12/28/2022 0.0960 < 0.0119 < 0.0010 < 0.0007 < 0.0315 T56 (Indicator) 12/28/2022 0.1250 < 0.0189 < 0.0012 < 0.0008 < 0.0086

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 44 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Page 13 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 21: Supplemental Air Cartridges - Iodine-131 Analysis: Iodine-131 Units: pCi/m3 End Date T52 (Indicator) T56 (Indicator)

LLD 0.07 0.07 01/06/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 01/12/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 01/19/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 01/27/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 02/02/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 02/09/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 02/15/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 02/24/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 03/02/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 03/07/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 03/16/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 03/23/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 03/30/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 04/05/2022 < 0.030 < 0.020 04/13/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 04/19/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 04/27/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 05/02/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 05/11/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 05/17/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 05/24/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 05/31/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 06/06/2022 < 0.030 < 0.020 06/14/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 06/21/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 06/27/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 07/04/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 07/12/2022 < 0.030 < 0.020 07/19/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 07/26/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 08/01/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 (1) (1) 08/09/2022 08/16/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 08/23/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 09/06/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 09/14/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 09/20/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 09/26/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 (2) (2) 09/30/2022 10/04/2022 < 0.010 < 0.010 10/11/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 10/19/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 10/25/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 10/31/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 11/09/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 11/15/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 11/21/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 11/30/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 12/06/2022 < 0.040 < 0.030 12/13/2022 < 0.020 < 0.010 12/21/2022 < 0.020 < 0.020 12/27/2022 < 0.030 < 0.030 (1)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 5 (2)

See Attachment 1, Table 7, Samples Deviations Table, Comment 6

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 45 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 14 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 22: Supplemental Surface Water - Tritium and Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/L Location End Date H-3 K-40 Location End Date H-3 K-40 Location End Date H-3 K-40 Location End Date H-3 K-40 REQUIRED LLD 3,000 -- REQUIRED LLD 3,000 -- REQUIRED LLD 3,000 -- REQUIRED LLD 3,000 --

T08 T75 T84 T97 01/20/2022 6945 298 01/18/2022 < 133 < 42 01/19/2022 7044 270 01/20/2022 7028 283 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 02/15/2022 5655 248 02/14/2022 < 131 < 68 02/15/2022 5560 283 02/15/2022 5611 311 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 03/08/2022 9063 275 03/07/2022 < 135 < 66 03/07/2022 7944 328 03/08/2022 7876 305 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 04/05/2022 11098 353 04/04/2022 < 133 < 76 04/04/2022 11679 390 04/05/2022 11094 293 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 05/03/2022 8530 416 05/03/2022 < 140 < 42 05/03/2022 8407 370 05/03/2022 8199 352 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 06/06/2022 3310 276 06/06/2022 < 133 < 82 06/06/2022 3142 317 06/06/2022 3219 233 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 07/05/2022 2322 344 07/06/2022 < 135 < 64 07/05/2022 2214 363 07/06/2022 2172 256 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 08/02/2022 1628 400 08/02/2022 < 137 < 73 08/02/2022 1570 298 08/02/2022 1570 272 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 09/07/2022 1049 394 09/07/2022 < 136 < 41 09/07/2022 1084 408 09/07/2022 2322 344 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 10/04/2022 1137 242 10/04/2022 < 131 < 52 10/04/2022 1140 362 10/04/2022 1278 276 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 11/01/2022 1236 357 11/01/2022 < 129 < 73 11/01/2022 1128 300 11/01/2022 1090 240 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

T08 T75 T84 T97 12/13/2022 3234 336 12/13/2022 < 134 41 12/13/2022 3084 312 12/13/2022 2971 320 (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator) (Indicator)

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 46 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 15 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 23: Supplemental Shoreline Sediment - Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg (dry)

Location Collection Date Be-7 K-40 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Th-232 U-235 U-238 REQUIRED LLD -- -- 180 -- -- -- -- --

T01 (Indicator) 01/20/2022 < 62 < 153 <9 343 634 < 43 40 207 T02 (Indicator) 03/08/2022 < 111 385 < 14 307 1060 < 48 67 183 T03 (Indicator) 03/08/2022 < 204 1410 13 2060 2210 < 123 139 < 383 T04 (Indicator) 01/20/2022 106 198 < 10 593 731 < 41 46 311 T07 (Indicator) 03/08/2022 < 116 815 29 < 704 < 494 < 58 58 < 183 T08 (Indicator) 03/08/2022 < 155 < 185 < 15 < 1670 1370 < 73 86 80 T10 (Indicator) 03/08/2022 < 176 700 < 17 < 1660 < 621 < 92 < 39 < 308 T84* (Indicator) 01/20/2022 142 235 < 13 817 1190 < 53 75 405 T85* (Indicator) 01/20/2022 < 111 562 < 14 575 858 < 95 54 198 T84* (Indicator) 07/05/2022 383 931 < 33 < 32 < 14 15 1630 438 T85* (Indicator) 07/06/2022 < 198 560 < 40 < 43 < 18 < 21 < 667 1060

Note that site T48 is the same location as site T05, and site T85 is the same location as site T06.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 47 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 2 Page 16 of 16 Monitoring Results Tables Table 24: Supplemental Food Crops - Gamma Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg (wet)

Collection Location Sample Type Be-7 K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 Date REQUIRED LLD -- -- 80 --

T43 (Indicator) 01/20/2022 Corn & Green Beans < 76 2510 < 11 < 206 T44 (Indicator) 02/14/2022 Corn & Green Beans < 59 2210 <8 < 144 T45 (Indicator) 03/07/2022 Corn & Green Beans < 110 2410 < 13 < 401

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 48 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 3 Page 1 of 3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results 1.0 Summary The Interlaboratory Comparison Program consists of participating in the DOE Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).

This program provides similar testing (matrices, nuclides, and levels) as the former EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program and is referred to as the Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).

The samples are analyzed using the methods applicable to the REMP (gamma spectroscopy, Gross Beta, and Tritium for water).

From the MAPEP handbook:

Acceptance criteria were developed from a review of precision and accuracy data compiled by other performance evaluation programs (PEPs), the analytical methods literature, from several MAPEP pilot studies, and from what is considered reasonable, acceptable, and achievable for routine analyses among the more experienced laboratories.

The State laboratory participated in MAPEP 46 and 47. These satisfied the requirement of Control 5.3 of the ODCM for the Interlaboratory Comparison Program.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 49 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 3 Page 2 of 3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results Table 25: DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) 46 RESULTS Program Ref. Flag Acceptance Result status Radionuclide Value (Evaluation) Range Matrix: RdF Air Filter Bq/filter Required MN54 0.004 A False Positive Test Required CO57 0.018 A False Positive Test Required CO60 0.728 0.72 A 0.50 - 0.94 ZN65 -0.005 A False Positive Test Required CS134 0.852 0.93 A 0.65 - 1.21 Required CS137 0.733 0.726 A 0.508 - 0.944 Matrix: GrF Air Filter Bq/filter Required Gross Beta 0.645 0.681 A 0.341 - 1.022 Gross Required 0.916 1.20 A 0.36 - 2.04 Alpha Matrix: MaS Soil Bq/kg Required K40 568.25 596 A 417 - 775 MN54 1104.17 1140 A 798-1482 CO57 1217.50 1400 A 980 - 1820 CO60 410.83 443 A 310 - 576 ZN65 0.86 A False Positive Test CS134 886.32 890 A 623-1157 Required CS137 335.00 365 A 256 - 475 Matrix: MaW Water Bq/L Required H3 322.92 300 A 210-390 MN54 18.347 18.9 A 13.2 - 24.6 CO57 34.068 36.0 A 25.2 - 46.8 Required CO60 8.778 9.3 A 6.5-12.1 ZN65 26.704 26.2 A 18.3 - 34.1 Required CS134 0.047 A False Positive Test Required CS137 7.469 7.64 A 5.35 - 9.93 SR90 13.6676 12.9 A 9.0 - 16.8 Matrix: RdV Vegetation, Bq/sample MN54 2.895 2.59 A 1.81 - 3.37 CO57 6.153 5.09 W 3.56 - 6.62 Required CO60 0.021 A False Positive Test ZN65 1.718 1.47 A 1.03 - 1.91 CS134 8.082 7.61 A 5.33 - 9.89 Required CS137 1.733 1.52 A 1.06 - 1.98 Evaluation: A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warning, N = Not Acceptable, NR = Not Reported A false positive test with an A designation flag identifies the result as less than the detectable activity, since MAPEP does not report zero values. Sensitivity Evaluation has no acceptance range but an identified value at low activity.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 50 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 3 Page 3 of 3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results Table 26: DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) 47 RESULTS Program Ref. Flag Acceptance Result status Radionuclide Value (Evaluation) Range Matrix: RdF Air Filter Bq/filter Required MN54 2.063 1.88 A 1.32 - 2.44 Required CO57 3.268 3.32 A 2.32 - 4.32 Required CO60 2.06 1.99 A 1.39 - 2.59 ZN65 1.847 1.58 A 1.11 - 2.05 Required CS134 0.02 A False Positive Test Required CS137 1.622 1.53 A 1.07 - 1.99 Matrix: GrF Air Filter Bq/filter Required Gross Beta 1.213 1.31 A 0.66 - 1.97 Gross Required 1.026 0.90 A 0.27 - 1.53 Alpha Matrix: MaS Soil Bq/kg Required K40 523.96 537 A 376 - 698 MN54 831.75 841 A 589 - 1093 CO57 680.83 786 A 550 - 1022 CO60 -0.14 A False Positive Test ZN65 1159.58 1140 A 798 - 1482 CS134 629.95 627 A 439 - 815 Required CS137 0.86 A False Positive Test Matrix: MaW Water Bq/L Required H3 400.44 395 A 277 - 514 MN54 0.175 A False Positive Test CO57 28.828 30.0 A 21.0 - 39.0 Required CO60 16.385 17.0 A 11.9 - 22.1 ZN65 11.827 11.3 A 7.9 - 14.7 Required CS134 16.037 17.1 A 12.0 - 22.2 Required CS137 17.21 16.8 A 11.8 - 21.8 SR90 8.06 7.73 A 5.41 - 10.05 Matrix: RdV Vegetation, Bq/sample:

MN54 2.565 2.43 A 1.70 - 3.16 CO57 0.009 A False Positive Test Required CO60 4.751 4.62 A 3.23 - 6.01 ZN65 8.035 7.49 A 5.24 - 9.74 CS134 -0.02 A False Positive Test Required CS137 1.224 1.083 A 0.758 - 1.408 Evaluation: A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warning, N = Not Acceptable, NR = Not Reported A false positive test with an A designation flag identifies the result as less than the detectable activity, since MAPEP does not report zero values. Sensitivity Evaluation has no acceptance range but an identified value at low activity.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 51 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 4 Page 1 of 4 Industry Initiative Ground Water Protection Program 2022 1.0 Description of Program Turkey Point Nuclear maintains a sampling and analysis program to meet procedural requirements.

The procedures that govern the performance are EV-AA-100-1001, Fleet Ground Water Protection Program Implementing Guideline and 0-ADM-654, Ground Water Protection Program.

The sampling frequency is quarterly; more often if conditions warrant.

Sample assay is performed by a private contractor GEL labs.

2.0 Discussion The Turkey Point Nuclear site is surrounded on three sides by the closed cooling canal system.

This canal system, in addition to being the source of tertiary cooling, is the body of water receiving permitted liquid radiological waste the canal system tritium level averages was 5,005 pCi/L in 2022 with a max concentration of 11,679 pCi/L. This supports the expectation to see tritium in subsurface water collected either on-site or off-site close to the (within the Owner Controlled Area) cooling canal system. Twenty-eight (28) wells were involved in the 2022 monitoring program; some locations have multiple (two or three) depths.

Samples are analyzed for Tritium & Gamma emitters. As conditions warrant, analysis included Fe-55, Ni-63, Sr-89/90 and alpha (all were < LLD).

3.0 Results The tritium results for the groundwater wells were from <MDA to 3,980 pCi/L. All results were less than the limits of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Table 5.1-2, Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples. Storm drain outfalls occasionally are below the tidal mark of the canal and will have ingress of canal water into the storm drain. The higher levels of tritium in the storm drain section are due to the canal water ingress into the storm drain.

Tabular results follow:

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 52 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 4 Page 2 of 4 Monitoring Results Tables Table 27: Ground Water - Tritium Analysis: Tritium Units: pCi/L First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Location 2022 2022 2022 2022 H-3 H-3 H-3 H-3 REQUIRED LLD 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 PTPED-1 299 199 281 409 CD-1 459 0.282 262 559 P-94-2 408 347 P-94-4 867 595 356 843 STP-1 65 92.7 PTN-MW-1s 32 -38.3 PTN-MW-1i 277 343 PTN-MW-1d 1050 1330 PTN-MW-2s 140 -55 PTN-MW-3s 47 170 PTN-MW-4s 96 -7.31 95.3 128 PTN-MW-4i 3510 -7.22 3690 3980 PTN-MW-4d 22 33.3 -29.1 86 PTN-MW-5s 86 -12.1 55.2 108 PTN-MW-5i 97 23.4 -38.6 97 PTN-MW-5d 1050 1170 1120 1560 PTN-MW-6s 51 65.4 -10.5 PTN-MW-6SR 127/-46.4(1)

PTN-MW-6d 1430 1120 1570 PTN-MW-6DR 748/223(1)

PTN-MW-7s 1340 969 1540 2160 PTN-MW-7i 3240 3100 83.3 3560 PTN-MW-7d 159 3.51 103 162 PTN-MW-8s 2750 427 3390 2520 PTN-MW-9s 1120 885 784 843 PTN-MW-10s -35 0.0478 PTN-MW-10i 19 16.3 PTN-MW-10d -39 -0.0245 PTN-MW-11s 151 30.3 139 222 PTN-MW-12s 1120 789 731 1220 NE StrmDrain 431 5700 2550 2370 SE StrmDrain 647 (3) 4940 (2)

W StrmDrain 6150 (3) 1390 (2)

CRF StrmDrain Dry Dry Dry Dry (1)

Replacement wells 6DR & 6SR were sampled twice in Qtr. 4.

(2)

Storm Drain submerged underwater at time of collection.

(3)

Sample inadvertently discarded prior to shipping off for analysis.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 53 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 4 Page 3 of 4 Industry Initiative Ground Water Protection Program 2022 D. List of wells and their locations Well Name Location PTN-MW-1s PTN-MW-1i Northeast of Switch Yard, South of entrance road to Fossil Plant PTN-MW-1d PTN-MW-2s South Switch Yard by parking lot PTN-MW-3s Northeast of new Issues Warehouse PTN-MW-4s PTN-MW-4i SW corner of parking lot South of Training Bldg.

PTN-MW-4d PTN-MW-5s PTN-MW-5i SW of CRF, by canal PTN-MW-5d PTN-MW-6s PTN-MW-6SR PTN-MW-6d NE of site in the berm for fossil oil tanks PTN-MW-6DR PTN-MW-7s PTN-MW-7i NE of RCA, by Neutralization Tank PTN-MW-7d PTN-MW-8s Near U3 RWST PTN-MW-9s Near U4 RWST PTN-MW-10s PTN-MW-10i SE of Radwaste Bldg. by S/G Bldg.

PTN-MW-10d PTN-MW-11s South of truck entrance to Rad Waste Bldg.

PTN-MW-12s West of Condenser Polisher road STP-1 West of Maintenance Bldg. on corner or road into parking lot P-94-4 East of Dressout Building, under delay fence P-94-2 By Neutralization Basin, East of the RCA CD-1 By Neutralization Basin, East of the RCA PTPED-1 By Neutralization Basin, East of the RCA Note: s, i and d refer to well depth: shallow - 20 ft., intermediate - 40 ft. and deep - 60 ft Maps depicting the well locations follow.

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 54 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Page 4 of 4 Industry Initiative Ground Water Protection Program 2022 Figure 5: Onsite Tritium Monitoring Wells

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 55 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Attachment 5 Page 1 of 2 ERRATA Data 2022 Significant errors should be corrected within one year of discovery, and the correction may be submitted with the next (normally scheduled) submittal of the AREOR as follows. A brief narrative explanation of the errors should be included in, Errata/Corrections to Previous AREORs, Supplemental Information. The narrative should include a statement that the affected pages, in their entirety, are included as attachments to the AREOR. Additionally, the affected, corrected pages, in their entirety, should be submitted as an attachment to the AREOR. The corrected pages should reference the affected calendar year and should contain revision bars in the margins of the page to indicate the locations of the changes. If submitting corrections to multiple AREORs, make a separate attachment for each of the affected years.

Other methods of correcting previous AREORs may be used provided the corrections are clearly and completely described.

Significant errors include:

Inaccurate reporting of samples collected and analyzed.

Inaccurate reporting of sample results.

Omissions that impede the NRCs ability to adequately assess the information supplied by the licensee, or other errors that alter the intent of the report.

1.0 List of changes from the 2021 AREOR.

1. Page 30 of 55: The entries that indicated tritium reporting levels exceeded were removed. According to the ODCM this value does not exceed the reporting limit nor level.

2. Page 31 of 55: Comment number 13, now Comment number 8, had the incorrect AR# listed in the Evaluation/Actions box. The AR# was changed from AR#

0422809 to AR# 02422809.

l

Plant: Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 & 4 Year: 2022 Page 56 of 56 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Page 2 of 2 ERRATA Data 2022

3. Page 52 of 55: The value listed for canal systems tritium level average of 7,126 pCi/L was corrected to 7,970 pCi/L.

l

L-2023-061, 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Contents

Text

Enclosure:

SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

L-2023-061, 2022 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Text

Enclosure:

SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search