ML101170840: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Guzman, Richard Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:25 PM To: Dosa, John J  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                     Guzman, Richard Sent:                     Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:25 PM To:                       Dosa, John J


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review of LAR - ME3737 Nine Mile Point U1 - Rev to Containment Spray System Nozzle Surveillance Frequency  
Acceptance Review of LAR - ME3737 Nine Mile Point U1 - Rev to Containment Spray System Nozzle Surveillance Frequency
 
: John, By letter dated March 22, 2010, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC (NMPNS) submitted a license amendment for Nine Mile Point, Unit No. 1 (NMP1). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review.
John, By letter dated March 22, 2010, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC (NMPNS) submitted a license amendment for Nine Mile Point, Unit No. 1 (NMP1). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff=s detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff=s detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (F5A4366DF596BF458646C9D433EA37D72923FE6E82)  
Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (F5A4366DF596BF458646C9D433EA37D72923FE6E82)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review of LAR - ME3737 Nine Mile Point U1 - Rev to Containment Spray System Nozzle Surveillance Frequency Sent Date:       4/27/2010 3:25:31 PM Received Date:        4/27/2010 3:25:32 PM From:               Guzman, Richard Created By:        Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov
Acceptance Review of LAR - ME3737 Nine Mile Point U1 - Rev to Containment Spray System Nozzle Surveillance Frequency Sent Date:       4/27/2010 3:25:31 PM Received Date:        4/27/2010 3:25:32 PM From:             Guzman, Richard


Recipients:
Created By:      Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov Recipients:
John.Dosa@cengllc.com (Dosa, John J)
John.Dosa@cengllc.com (Dosa, John J)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
 
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files         Size     Date & Time MESSAGE         9285     4/27/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Post Office:
Priority:             olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:     False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov  
 
Files               Size       Date & Time  
 
MESSAGE       9285       4/27/2010  
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                       olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:       False  
 
Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 19:21, 13 November 2019

Acceptance Review of LAR - Revision to Containment Spray System Nozzle Surveillance Frequency
ML101170840
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/27/2010
From: Richard Guzman
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Dosa J
Nine Mile Point
Guzman R, NRR/DORL, 415-1030
References
TAC ME3737
Download: ML101170840 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Guzman, Richard Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:25 PM To: Dosa, John J

Subject:

Acceptance Review of LAR - ME3737 Nine Mile Point U1 - Rev to Containment Spray System Nozzle Surveillance Frequency

John, By letter dated March 22, 2010, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC (NMPNS) submitted a license amendment for Nine Mile Point, Unit No. 1 (NMP1). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review.

The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.

Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff=s detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030 Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (F5A4366DF596BF458646C9D433EA37D72923FE6E82)

Subject:

Acceptance Review of LAR - ME3737 Nine Mile Point U1 - Rev to Containment Spray System Nozzle Surveillance Frequency Sent Date: 4/27/2010 3:25:31 PM Received Date: 4/27/2010 3:25:32 PM From: Guzman, Richard

Created By: Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov Recipients:

John.Dosa@cengllc.com (Dosa, John J)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 9285 4/27/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML101170840&oldid=2134037"