ML061320194: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML061320194
| number = ML061320194
| issue date = 02/22/2006
| issue date = 02/22/2006
| title = E-mail from T. Rice of the State of New York to Dcroule@Entergy.Com and J. Noggle of Usnrc, Regarding Preliminary 2/7 H-3 Results
| title = E-mail from T. Rice of the State of New York to Dcroule@Entergy.Com and J. Noggle of USNRC, Regarding Preliminary 2/7 H-3 Results
| author name = Rice T
| author name = Rice T
| author affiliation = State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation
| author affiliation = State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation

Revision as of 19:18, 13 July 2019

E-mail from T. Rice of the State of New York to Dcroule@Entergy.Com and J. Noggle of USNRC, Regarding Preliminary 2/7 H-3 Results
ML061320194
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/2006
From: Rice T
State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation
To: Croulet D
Entergy Nuclear Operations, NRC/FSME
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0140
Download: ML061320194 (2)


Text

James Noggle -Preliminary 2/7 H-3 results ,.. .-. I 7.,e 2; ..d v ...Page 1 From: To: Date:

Subject:

"Timothy Rice" <tbrice © gw.dec.state.ny.us>

<dcroule @ entergy.com>, <jdn © nrc.gov>2/22/06 11:38AM Preliminary 2/7 H-3 results Hello Jim and Don, Attached is an Excel file with the first of the State's preliminary H-3 results from the 2/7 splits.I compared them to the #s Kathleen sent in her update and was pleasantly surprised at just how well they agreed.The only significant difference was for MW-30.John Frisone, our person there for the sampling, explained that GZA collected that particular sample and did it by consecutively filling the three containers from the well sampling pump output tube. Not a true split sample.The rest of the samples were collected as splits by first filling a single larger container and then filling the three sample containers from that. This appears to explain the difference in precision of results between MW-1l1 and the other sample points.I will provide the other data as soon as I get it from Wadsworth.

If you need to report our results, please preface it with the explanation that the data has not gone through the labs full QA process yet and the final results may vary somewhat from these preliminary values.Tim CC: "Barbara Youngberg" <bayoungb@gw.dec.state.ny.us>, <rpsO2 @ health.state.ny.us>

-.d~i~:, .'s LINC Sample Number 200620865001 200620865002 200620865003 200620865004 200620865005 200620865006 200620865007 200620865008 IPEC NUMBER MW-30 MW-31 MW-32 MW-33 MW-34 MW-35 MW-36 MW-38 Collection Date TRITIUM RESULT 3.76E+05 3.38E+04 1.92E+04 2.02E+05 1.74E+05 8.88E+04 2.1 OE+04 pCi/L+/- 1.14E+04+/- 1.16E+03+/- 7.30E+02+/- 6.19E+03+/- 5.38E+03+/- 2.82E+03+/- 7.73E+02< 1.12E+02