NL-15-048, 2014 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 260: | Line 260: | ||
20 8.0 SITE SPECIFIC COM M ITM ENTS ...................................... | 20 8.0 SITE SPECIFIC COM M ITM ENTS ...................................... | ||
21 9.0 ATTACHM ENTS .................................................................. | 21 9.0 ATTACHM ENTS .................................................................. | ||
21 | 21 1.0 PURPOSE The Process Control Program (PCP) requires formulas, sampling, analyses, test and determinations to be made to ensure that the processing and packing of solid radioactive wastes based on demonstrated processing of actual or simulated wet solid wastes will be accomplished in such a way as to assure compliance with 10 CFR Parts 20, 61 and 71, State Regulations, burial ground requirements, and other requirements governing the disposal of solid radioactive waste. The scope of a PCP is to assure that radioactive waste will be handled, shipped, and disposed of in a safe manner in accordance with approved site or vendor procedures, whichever is applicable. | ||
The Process Control Program (PCP) requires formulas, sampling, analyses, test and determinations to be made to ensure that the processing and packing of solid radioactive wastes based on demonstrated processing of actual or simulated wet solid wastes will be accomplished in such a way as to assure compliance with 10 CFR Parts 20, 61 and 71, State Regulations, burial ground requirements, and other requirements governing the disposal of solid radioactive waste. The scope of a PCP is to assure that radioactive waste will be handled, shipped, and disposed of in a safe manner in accordance with approved site or vendor procedures, whichever is applicable. | |||
[GGNS UFSAR, Chapter 16B.1 I TRM -7.6.3.8 paragraph 1]1.1 The purpose of this document is to provide a description of the solid radioactive waste Process Control Program (PCP) at all the Entergy fleet sites. The PCP describes the methods used for processing, classification and packaging low-level wet radioactive waste into a form acceptable for interim on-site storage, shipping and disposal, in accordance with 10 CFR Part 61 and current disposal site criteria.1.2 To ensure the safe operation of the solid radwaste system, the solid radwaste system will be used in accordance with this Process Control Program to process radioactive wastes to meet interim on-site storage, shipping and burial ground requirements. | [GGNS UFSAR, Chapter 16B.1 I TRM -7.6.3.8 paragraph 1]1.1 The purpose of this document is to provide a description of the solid radioactive waste Process Control Program (PCP) at all the Entergy fleet sites. The PCP describes the methods used for processing, classification and packaging low-level wet radioactive waste into a form acceptable for interim on-site storage, shipping and disposal, in accordance with 10 CFR Part 61 and current disposal site criteria.1.2 To ensure the safe operation of the solid radwaste system, the solid radwaste system will be used in accordance with this Process Control Program to process radioactive wastes to meet interim on-site storage, shipping and burial ground requirements. | ||
1.3 This document addresses the process control program in the context of disposal criteria, on-site processing and vendor processing requirements. | 1.3 This document addresses the process control program in the context of disposal criteria, on-site processing and vendor processing requirements. | ||
Line 281: | Line 278: | ||
[11] NRC Information and Enforcement Bulletins (continued) | [11] NRC Information and Enforcement Bulletins (continued) | ||
NRC Information Notice 89-27: Limitations on the Use of Waste Forms and High Integrity Containers for the Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste* NRC Information Notice 92-62: Emergency Response Information Requirements for Radioactive Material Shipments* NRC Information Notice 92-72: Employee Training and Shipper Registration Requirements for Transporting Radioactive Materials NRC Generic Letter 89-01, "Implementation of Programmatic Controls for Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications in the Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications and the Relocation of Procedural Details of RETS to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual or to the Process Control Program".[12] Nureg-0800 Standard Review Plan Section 11.4 Revision 2, Solid Waste Management Systems.[13] NRC Waste Form Technical Position, Revision 1 Jan 24 1991.[14] NRC SECY 94-198 Review of Existing Guidance Concerning the Extended Storage of Low-Level Radioactive Waste.[15] EPRI TR-106925 Rev-1, Interim On-Site Storage of Low Level Waste: Guidelines for Extended Storage -October1996 | NRC Information Notice 89-27: Limitations on the Use of Waste Forms and High Integrity Containers for the Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste* NRC Information Notice 92-62: Emergency Response Information Requirements for Radioactive Material Shipments* NRC Information Notice 92-72: Employee Training and Shipper Registration Requirements for Transporting Radioactive Materials NRC Generic Letter 89-01, "Implementation of Programmatic Controls for Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications in the Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications and the Relocation of Procedural Details of RETS to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual or to the Process Control Program".[12] Nureg-0800 Standard Review Plan Section 11.4 Revision 2, Solid Waste Management Systems.[13] NRC Waste Form Technical Position, Revision 1 Jan 24 1991.[14] NRC SECY 94-198 Review of Existing Guidance Concerning the Extended Storage of Low-Level Radioactive Waste.[15] EPRI TR-106925 Rev-1, Interim On-Site Storage of Low Level Waste: Guidelines for Extended Storage -October1996 | ||
[16] NRC Branch Technical Position On Concentration Averaging And Encapsulation Jan 17 1995[17] Commitment Documents (U-2 and U-3)IPN-99-079, "Supplement to Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Incorporating Recommendations of Generic Letter 89-01 and the Revised 10 CFR Part 20 and 10 CFR Part 50.36a.* Appendix B Technical Specifications, Section 4.5 [IP, RECS ODCM Part 1] | [16] NRC Branch Technical Position On Concentration Averaging And Encapsulation Jan 17 1995[17] Commitment Documents (U-2 and U-3)IPN-99-079, "Supplement to Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Incorporating Recommendations of Generic Letter 89-01 and the Revised 10 CFR Part 20 and 10 CFR Part 50.36a.* Appendix B Technical Specifications, Section 4.5 [IP, RECS ODCM Part 1] | ||
3.0 DEFINITIONS | |||
[1] Batch -A quantity of waste to be processed having essentially consistent physical and chemical characteristics as determined through past experience or system operation knowledge by the Radwaste Shipping Specialist. | [1] Batch -A quantity of waste to be processed having essentially consistent physical and chemical characteristics as determined through past experience or system operation knowledge by the Radwaste Shipping Specialist. | ||
A batch could be a waste tank, several waste tanks grouped together or a designated time period such as between outages as with the DAW waste stream. An isolated quantity of feed waste to be processed having essentially constant physical and chemical characteristics.(The addition or removal of water will not be considered to create a new batch).[2] Certificate of Compliance | A batch could be a waste tank, several waste tanks grouped together or a designated time period such as between outages as with the DAW waste stream. An isolated quantity of feed waste to be processed having essentially constant physical and chemical characteristics.(The addition or removal of water will not be considered to create a new batch).[2] Certificate of Compliance | ||
Line 326: | Line 322: | ||
* Designating other approved procedures (if required) to be implemented in the packaging of any specific batch of waste.* Providing a designated regulatory point of contact between the Plant and the NRC, volume reduction facility or disposal site.* Maintaining records of on-site and off-site waste stream sample analysis and Plant evaluations. | * Designating other approved procedures (if required) to be implemented in the packaging of any specific batch of waste.* Providing a designated regulatory point of contact between the Plant and the NRC, volume reduction facility or disposal site.* Maintaining records of on-site and off-site waste stream sample analysis and Plant evaluations. | ||
* Suspending shipments of defectively processed or defectively packaged radioactive wastes from the site when the provisions of this process control program are not satisfied. | * Suspending shipments of defectively processed or defectively packaged radioactive wastes from the site when the provisions of this process control program are not satisfied. | ||
5.0 DETAILS An isotopic analysis SHALL be performed on every batch for each waste stream so that the waste can be classified in accordance with 10CFR61. The isotopic and curie content of each shipping container SHALL be determined in accordance with 49CFR packaging requirements. | |||
An isotopic analysis SHALL be performed on every batch for each waste stream so that the waste can be classified in accordance with 10CFR61. The isotopic and curie content of each shipping container SHALL be determined in accordance with 49CFR packaging requirements. | |||
The total activity in the container may be determined by either isotopic analysis or by dose-rate-to-curie conversion. | The total activity in the container may be determined by either isotopic analysis or by dose-rate-to-curie conversion. | ||
5.1. Precautions and Limitations | |||
and Limitations | |||
[1] Precautions (a) Radioactive materials SHALL be handled in accordance with applicable radiation protection procedures.(b) All radioactive waste processed on-site OR off-site by vendors must be processed or packaged to meet the minimum requirements listed in 10CFR Part 61.56 (a) (1) through (8). | [1] Precautions (a) Radioactive materials SHALL be handled in accordance with applicable radiation protection procedures.(b) All radioactive waste processed on-site OR off-site by vendors must be processed or packaged to meet the minimum requirements listed in 10CFR Part 61.56 (a) (1) through (8). | ||
: 5. 11], continued (c) If the provisions of the Process Control Program are not satisfied, suspend shipment of the defectively processed or defectively packaged waste from the site. Shipment may be accomplished when the waste is processed | : 5. 11], continued (c) If the provisions of the Process Control Program are not satisfied, suspend shipment of the defectively processed or defectively packaged waste from the site. Shipment may be accomplished when the waste is processed | ||
/ packaged in accordance with the Process Control Program.(d) The generation of combustible gases is dependent on the waste form, radioactive concentration and accumulated dose in the waste. Changes to organic inputs (e.g. oil) to waste stream may change biogas generation rates.[2] Limitations (a) Only qualified personnel will characterize OR package radioactive waste OR radioactive materials for transportation or disposal.(b) All site personnel that have any involvement with radioactive waste management computer software SHALL be familiar with its functions, operation and maintenance. | / packaged in accordance with the Process Control Program.(d) The generation of combustible gases is dependent on the waste form, radioactive concentration and accumulated dose in the waste. Changes to organic inputs (e.g. oil) to waste stream may change biogas generation rates.[2] Limitations (a) Only qualified personnel will characterize OR package radioactive waste OR radioactive materials for transportation or disposal.(b) All site personnel that have any involvement with radioactive waste management computer software SHALL be familiar with its functions, operation and maintenance. | ||
5.2. Waste Management Practices[1] Waste processing methods include the following: (a) Present and planned practice is NOT to solidify or encapsulate any waste streams.(b) Waste being shipped directly for burial in a HIC (High Integrity Container) is dewatered to less than 1 percent by volume prior to shipment.(c) Waste being shipped directly for burial in a container other than a HIC is dewatered to less than 0.5 percent by volume prior to shipment.(d) IF solidification is required in the future, THEN at least one representative test specimen from at least every 10th batch of each type of radioactive waste will be checked to verify solidification. | |||
Management Practices[1] Waste processing methods include the following: (a) Present and planned practice is NOT to solidify or encapsulate any waste streams.(b) Waste being shipped directly for burial in a HIC (High Integrity Container) is dewatered to less than 1 percent by volume prior to shipment.(c) Waste being shipped directly for burial in a container other than a HIC is dewatered to less than 0.5 percent by volume prior to shipment.(d) IF solidification is required in the future, THEN at least one representative test specimen from at least every 10th batch of each type of radioactive waste will be checked to verify solidification. | |||
(1) IF any specimen fails to verify solidification, THEN the solidification of the batch under test SHALL be suspended until such time as additional test specimens can be obtained, alternative solidification parameters can be determined, and a subsequent test verifies solidification. | (1) IF any specimen fails to verify solidification, THEN the solidification of the batch under test SHALL be suspended until such time as additional test specimens can be obtained, alternative solidification parameters can be determined, and a subsequent test verifies solidification. | ||
If alternative parameters are determined, the subsequent tests shall be verified using the alternative parameters determined. | If alternative parameters are determined, the subsequent tests shall be verified using the alternative parameters determined. | ||
Line 348: | Line 337: | ||
* Sustained, unexplained, changes in the routinely monitored Beta/Alpha ratios, as determined by Radiation Protection,* When there is an extended reactor shutdown (> 90 days).* When there are changes to liquid waste processing, such as bypassing filters, utilizing filters or a change in ion exchange media.* When there are changes to the waste stream that could change the biogas generation rate.[3] The following requirements apply to infrequent or abnormal waste types: (a) Infrequent OR abnormal waste types that may be generated must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.(b) The RP Department Supervisor | * Sustained, unexplained, changes in the routinely monitored Beta/Alpha ratios, as determined by Radiation Protection,* When there is an extended reactor shutdown (> 90 days).* When there are changes to liquid waste processing, such as bypassing filters, utilizing filters or a change in ion exchange media.* When there are changes to the waste stream that could change the biogas generation rate.[3] The following requirements apply to infrequent or abnormal waste types: (a) Infrequent OR abnormal waste types that may be generated must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.(b) The RP Department Supervisor | ||
/ Specialist responsible for processing AND shipping will determine if the waste can be correlated to an existing waste stream.(c) IF the radioactive waste cannot be correlated to an existing waste stream, THEN the RP Department Supervisor | / Specialist responsible for processing AND shipping will determine if the waste can be correlated to an existing waste stream.(c) IF the radioactive waste cannot be correlated to an existing waste stream, THEN the RP Department Supervisor | ||
/ Specialist responsible for processing and shipping SHALL determine specific off-site sampling and analysis requirements necessary to properly classify the material.[4] Specific sampling methods and data evaluation criteria are detailed in EN-RW-104 for specific waste streams. | / Specialist responsible for processing and shipping SHALL determine specific off-site sampling and analysis requirements necessary to properly classify the material.[4] Specific sampling methods and data evaluation criteria are detailed in EN-RW-104 for specific waste streams. | ||
5.4. Waste Classification | |||
Classification | |||
[1] General requirements for scaling factors include the following: (a) The Plant has established an inferential measurement program whereby concentrations of radionuclides which cannot be readily measured are estimated through ratio-ing with radionuclides which can be readily measured.(b) Scaling factor relationships are developed on a waste stream-specific basis.These relationships are periodically revised to reflect current independent lab data from direct measurement of samples. The scaling factor relationships currently used by the sites are as follows: " Hard to detect ACTIVATION product radionuclides and C-14 are estimated by using scaling factors with measured Co-60 activities. | [1] General requirements for scaling factors include the following: (a) The Plant has established an inferential measurement program whereby concentrations of radionuclides which cannot be readily measured are estimated through ratio-ing with radionuclides which can be readily measured.(b) Scaling factor relationships are developed on a waste stream-specific basis.These relationships are periodically revised to reflect current independent lab data from direct measurement of samples. The scaling factor relationships currently used by the sites are as follows: " Hard to detect ACTIVATION product radionuclides and C-14 are estimated by using scaling factors with measured Co-60 activities. | ||
* Hard to detect FISSION product radionuclides and H-3, Tc-99 and 1-129 are estimated by using scaling factors with measured Cs-1 37 activities. | * Hard to detect FISSION product radionuclides and H-3, Tc-99 and 1-129 are estimated by using scaling factors with measured Cs-1 37 activities. | ||
Line 359: | Line 346: | ||
[2] General requirements for the determination of total activity and radionuclide concentrations include the following: (a) The activity for the waste streams is estimated by using either Gross Radioactivity Measurement OR Direct Measurement of Radionuclides. | [2] General requirements for the determination of total activity and radionuclide concentrations include the following: (a) The activity for the waste streams is estimated by using either Gross Radioactivity Measurement OR Direct Measurement of Radionuclides. | ||
Current specific practices are as follows:* DAW -Gross radioactivity measurement in conjunction with the RADMAN computer codes, other approved computer codes or hand calculation. | Current specific practices are as follows:* DAW -Gross radioactivity measurement in conjunction with the RADMAN computer codes, other approved computer codes or hand calculation. | ||
* Filters -Gross radioactivity measurement in conjunction with the FILTRK computer code, other approved computer codes or hand calculation." All Other Waste Streams -Direct measurement of radionuclides in conjunction with the RADMAN computer codes, other approved computer codes or hand calculation.(b) Determination of the NRC waste classification is performed by comparing the measured or calculated concentrations of significant radionuclides in the final waste form to those listed in 10CFR Part 61.55. | * Filters -Gross radioactivity measurement in conjunction with the FILTRK computer code, other approved computer codes or hand calculation." All Other Waste Streams -Direct measurement of radionuclides in conjunction with the RADMAN computer codes, other approved computer codes or hand calculation.(b) Determination of the NRC waste classification is performed by comparing the measured or calculated concentrations of significant radionuclides in the final waste form to those listed in 10CFR Part 61.55. | ||
5.5. Quality Control[1] The RADMAN computer code provides a mechanism to assist the Plant in conducting a quality control program in accordance with the waste classification requirements listed in 10CFR Part 61.55. All waste stream sample data changes are written to a computer data file for future review and reference. | |||
Control[1] The RADMAN computer code provides a mechanism to assist the Plant in conducting a quality control program in accordance with the waste classification requirements listed in 10CFR Part 61.55. All waste stream sample data changes are written to a computer data file for future review and reference. | |||
[2] Audits and Management Review includes the following: (a) Appendix G to 10CFR20 requires conduct of a QC program which must include management review of audits.(b) Management audits of the Plant Sampling and Classification Program SHALL be periodically performed to verify the adequacy of maintenance sampling and analysis.(c) Audits and assessments are performed and documented by any of the following: | [2] Audits and Management Review includes the following: (a) Appendix G to 10CFR20 requires conduct of a QC program which must include management review of audits.(b) Management audits of the Plant Sampling and Classification Program SHALL be periodically performed to verify the adequacy of maintenance sampling and analysis.(c) Audits and assessments are performed and documented by any of the following: | ||
* Radiation Protection Department | * Radiation Protection Department | ||
Line 368: | Line 353: | ||
* Qualified Vendors (d) Certain elements of the Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual are applied to the Process Control Program. [QAPM, Section A.1.c]5.6. Dewaterina Operations | * Qualified Vendors (d) Certain elements of the Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual are applied to the Process Control Program. [QAPM, Section A.1.c]5.6. Dewaterina Operations | ||
[1] Processing requirements during dewatering operations include the following: (a) All dewatering operations are performed per approved Plant or vendor operating procedures and instructions.(b) Dewatering limitations and capabilities are verified by vendor Topical Reports or Operating and Testing Procedures. | [1] Processing requirements during dewatering operations include the following: (a) All dewatering operations are performed per approved Plant or vendor operating procedures and instructions.(b) Dewatering limitations and capabilities are verified by vendor Topical Reports or Operating and Testing Procedures. | ||
[2] Dewatered resin activity limitations include the following: (a) Dewatered resins will not be shipped off-site that have activities which will produce greater than 1.0E+8 rads total accumulated dose over 300 years. This is usually verified by comparing the container specific activity at the time of shipment to the following concentration limits for radionuclides with a half-life greater than five years:* 10 Ci (0.37 TBq) per cubic foot.* 350 uCi (12.95 MBq) per cubic centimeter | [2] Dewatered resin activity limitations include the following: (a) Dewatered resins will not be shipped off-site that have activities which will produce greater than 1.0E+8 rads total accumulated dose over 300 years. This is usually verified by comparing the container specific activity at the time of shipment to the following concentration limits for radionuclides with a half-life greater than five years:* 10 Ci (0.37 TBq) per cubic foot.* 350 uCi (12.95 MBq) per cubic centimeter 5.7. Waste Packaging Waste in final form will be packaged in accordance with Title 10 and Title 49 of the Code of federal regulations and in accordance with current burial site criteria as is detailed in EN-RW-102. | ||
5.8. Administrative Controls[1] Information on solid radioactive waste shipped off-site is reported annually to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report as specified by the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) or Technical Specification. | |||
Packaging Waste in final form will be packaged in accordance with Title 10 and Title 49 of the Code of federal regulations and in accordance with current burial site criteria as is detailed in EN-RW-102. | |||
Controls[1] Information on solid radioactive waste shipped off-site is reported annually to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report as specified by the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) or Technical Specification. | |||
[ANO1 Technical Specifications | [ANO1 Technical Specifications | ||
-5.6.3] [ANO2 Technical Specifications | -5.6.3] [ANO2 Technical Specifications | ||
Line 407: | Line 386: | ||
5.10[2] continued (e) Cyclic training is defined as within three years for DOT & within two years for IATA.Copies of training records are required for as long as a person is employed and 90 days thereafter. | 5.10[2] continued (e) Cyclic training is defined as within three years for DOT & within two years for IATA.Copies of training records are required for as long as a person is employed and 90 days thereafter. | ||
The records should include, as a minimum, the following: | The records should include, as a minimum, the following: | ||
* Trainee's name and signature" Training dates* Training material or source reference* Trainer's information | * Trainee's name and signature" Training dates* Training material or source reference* Trainer's information 6.0 INTERFACES | ||
[I] EN-LI-1 00, "Process Applicability Determination"[2] EN-RW-104, "Scaling Factors"[3] EN-QV-I 04, "Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual Control" 7.0 RECORDS[1] Documentation of pertinent data required to classify waste and verify solidification will be maintained on each batch of processed waste as required by approved procedures. | [I] EN-LI-1 00, "Process Applicability Determination"[2] EN-RW-104, "Scaling Factors"[3] EN-QV-I 04, "Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual Control" 7.0 RECORDS[1] Documentation of pertinent data required to classify waste and verify solidification will be maintained on each batch of processed waste as required by approved procedures. | ||
[2] Documentation will also be maintained to ensure that containers, shipping casks, and methods of packaging wastes meet applicable Federal regulations and disposal site criteria. | [2] Documentation will also be maintained to ensure that containers, shipping casks, and methods of packaging wastes meet applicable Federal regulations and disposal site criteria. | ||
Line 422: | Line 399: | ||
* VY VY ODCM 10.1 5.8 [1] VY VYTRM 6.12 5.8(3) VY QAPM Section A.1.c | * VY VY ODCM 10.1 5.8 [1] VY VYTRM 6.12 5.8(3) VY QAPM Section A.1.c | ||
* All* Covered by directive as a whole or by various paragraphs of the directive. | * All* Covered by directive as a whole or by various paragraphs of the directive. | ||
9.0 ATTACHMENTS None}} | |||
None}} |
Revision as of 14:15, 7 May 2019
ML15124A715 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Indian Point ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/28/2015 |
From: | Coyle L Entergy Nuclear Northeast |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
References | |
NL-15-048 | |
Download: ML15124A715 (95) | |
Text
=Entergy Enterav Nuclear Northeast Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Tel (914) 254-6700 Lawrence Coyle Site Vice President NL-15-048 April 28, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
SUBJECT:
2014 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos.50-003, 50-247 and 50-286 License Nos. DPR-5, DPR-26 and DPR-64
Dear Sir or Madam:
The enclosures to this letter provide Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 2014. Enclosure 1 provides the report while Enclosure 2 provides the Process Control Program which is discussed in Section G of the report. This report is submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.3 and Regulatory Guide 1.21.There are no new commitments being made in this submittal.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Robert W. Walpole, Regulatory Assurance Manager at (914) 254-6710.7Sincerely, LC/rl
Enclosure:
- 1) Radioactive Effluent Release Report: 2014 2) Process Control Program cc: Mr. Daniel H. Dorman, Regional Administrator, NRC Region I Mr. Douglas Pickett, NRC, Sr. Project Manager, Division of Reactor Licensing Mr. Kimberly A. Conway, IPEC NRC Unit 1 Project Manager NRC Resident Inspector's Office Mr. John B. Rhodes, President and CEO, NYSERDA (w/o enclosure)
Ms. Bridget Frymire, New York State Department of Public Service (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Timothy Rice, Bureau of Hazardous Waste & Radiation Mgmt. NYSDEC Mr. Robert Snyder, NYS Department of Health Mr. Chuck Nieder, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Mr. Jason Martinez, American Nuclear Insurers Chief, Compliance Section, New York State DEC Division of Water Regional Water Engineer, New York State DEC ENCLOSURE 1 TO NL-15-048 Radioactive Effluent Release Report: 2014 ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS.50-003, 50-247 AND 50-286 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 1 of 70 Radioactive Effluent Release Report: 2014 Facility Indian Point Energy Center (Indian Point Units 1, 2, and 3)Licensee Enter-gy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)This information is provided in accordance with the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.21. The numbered sections of this report reference corresponding sections of the subject Guide, pages 10 to 12.This report includes effluent information from Indian Point Units 1, 2, and 3. Units 1 and 2 share effluent processing equipment and Technical Specifications.
In this site report, releases from Unit 1 are included with Unit 2, while Unit 3 releases are calculated and shown separately.
A. Supplemental Information
- 1. Regulatory Limits Indian Point Energy Center is subject to limits on radioactive waste releases that are set forth in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), Parts I and II, as defined in the Technical Specifications.
ODCM Part I, also known as the Radiological Effluent Controls (or RECS) contains the specific requirements and controls, while ODCM Part II (calculational methodologies) contains the details necessary to perform offsite dose calculations from the sampling and monitoring outlined in the RECS.2. Maximum Permissible Concentration a) Airborne Releases Maximum concentrations and compliance with 10CFR20 release rate limits are controlled by the application of Radiation Monitor setpoints, preliminary grab sampling, and conservative procedural guidance for batch and continuous releases.
These measures, in conjunction with plant design, preclude approaching release rate limits, per the ODCM.b) Liquid Effluents Proximity to release rate and total release limits is controlled through the application of a calculated Allowed Diluted Concentration (ADC) and ALARA guidance with regard to dilution flow and maximum tank concentration.
The ADC is used to determine a Radiation Monitor setpoint associated with an estimated amount of non-gamma activity (H-3, Ni-63, Fe-55, Sr-89/90 etc.), as well as the measured gamma activity.
ADC is defined in the station ODCM as a means of assuring compliance with the release rate limits of 10CFR20, as defined by the application of ten times the Effluent Concentrations of the new 10CFR20.Liquid effluents are further controlled by the application of proceduralized ALARA limits such as a MINIMUM dilution flow of 100,000 gpm required for batch discharges, a maximum gamma concentration of 5E-5 uCi/ml (without gas) for routine effluents, and procedural guidance for optimizing decay and treatment of liquid waste.3. Average Energy This information is no longer used. It is available on site.
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 2 of 70 4. Measurements and Approximations of Total Radioactivity a) Fission and Activation Gases Analyses of effluent gases are performed in compliance with the requirements of the RECS (ODCM Part I). In the case of isolated tanks (batch releases), the total activity discharged is based on an isotopic analysis of each batch with the volume of gas in the batch corrected to standard temperature and pressure.Vapor containment purge and pressure relief (vent) discharges, which routinely total less than 150 hour0.00174 days <br />0.0417 hours <br />2.480159e-4 weeks <br />5.7075e-5 months <br />s/quarter in duration, have been treated as batch releases.
However, both types of releases from the Vapor Containment are performed randomly with regard to time of day and duration (release periods were not dependent solely on time of day or atmospheric condition).
Therefore, determination of doses due to Vapor Containment releases includes the use of annual average dispersion data, as defined in NUREG 0133, Section 3.3.At least one complete isotopic concentration analysis of containment air is performed monthly and compared to a process monitor's reading. Pressure reliefs are quantified by scaling subsequent releases with the monitor's reading, applying the mixture from the grab sample. In this fashion, the base grab sample defines the mixture and the activity released.
The monitor scales the release up or down and provides continuous indication of potential leaks.Isotopic analyses for each vapor containment purge are taken prior to and during the purge. This information is combined with the volume of air in each discharge to calculate the quantity of activity released from these discharges.
The continuous building discharges are based on weekly samples of ventilation air analyzed for isotopic content. This information is combined with total air volume discharged and the process radiation monitor readings to determine the quantity of activity from continuous discharges.
b/c) lodines and Particulates Iodine and particulate releases are quantified by collecting a continuous sample of ventilation air on a Triethylenediamine (TEDA) impregnated, activated charcoal cartridge and a glass-fiber filter paper. These samples are changed weekly as required in the RECS. The concentration of isotopes found by analysis of these samples is combined with the volume of air discharged during the sampling period to calculate the quantity of activity discharged.
If no 1-131 is identified in weekly vent samples, "-" is entered in Table 1A. A typical Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA) for weekly 1-131 analyses is 1.OE-13 uCi/cc, which is 100 times lower than ODCM requirements.
If 1-131 is identified in any routine weekly sample, it is added to the table and other iodine isotopic concentrations (1-133, 1-135) are then determined on a 24-hour sample at least once per month. The concentration of each isotope is analytically determined by ratioing the activities with weekly media for 1-131. This activity is combined with the volume of air discharged during the sampling period to calculate the quantity of activity discharged.
A compositing method of analyzing for gross alpha, Sr-89, and Sr-90 is used per the station ODCMs. An absence of any positive activity is identified as "-".
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 3 of 70 d) Carbon-14 C-14 release quantification details are discussed in Section E.e) Liquid Effluents A sample of each batch discharge is taken and an isotopic analysis is performed in compliance with requirements specified in the ODCM. Proportional composite samples of continuous discharges are taken and analyzed per the ODCM, as well. Isotopic concentration data are combined with the information on volume discharged to determine the amount of each isotope discharged.
A compositing method of analyzing for non-gamma emitters is used per the station ODCM (Gross Alpha, Sr-89, Sr-90, Fe-55 and Ni-63). When there has been no positive activity, "-" is entered.Liquid Effluent volumes of waste released on Table 2A are differentiated between processed fluids (routine liquid waste and Unit l's North Curtain Drain), and water discharged through monitored pathways identified in the ODCM, but NOT processed (SG Blowdown and Unit l's Sphere Foundation Drain Sump). The unprocessed water may still contain trace levels of contamination (generally only tritium) and as such, is identified as liquid waste. Curie and dose data from unprocessed fluid is included in the following tables, along with all other liquid effluent, continuous or batch, processed or not. Processed and unprocessed water is differentiated only to prevent confusion with regard to measures undertaken to convert liquid to solid waste (resin cleanup).
Therefore, volumes of processed and unprocessed liquid waste are reported separately on Table 2A.
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 4 of 70 5. Batch Releases Airborne: Unit I and 2 Airborne Releases.
Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 2014 Number of Batch Releases 72 64 59 61 256 Total Time Period (min) 4050 3340 3460 3470 14300 Maximum Time Period (min) 180 86 95 98 180 Average Time Period (min) 56.2 52.2 58.6 56.9 55.9 Minimum Time Period (min) 1 9 6 1 1 Unit 3 Airborne Releases Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 2014 Number of Batch Releases 17 18 20 23 78 Total Time Period (min) 2070 2070 2140 1970 8240 Maximum Time Period (min) 197 168 253 203 253 Average Time Period (min) 122 115 107 85.6 106 Minimum Time Period (min) 1 2 2 3 1 Liquid: Unit I and 2 Liquid Releases Qtr I Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 2014 Number of Batch Releases 34 18 4 11 67 Total Time Period (min) 6790 1950 373 1050 10200 Maximum Time Period (min) 1240 124 104 105 1240 Average Time Period (min) 200 108 93.3 95.5 152 Minimum Time Period (min) 94 43 75 87 43 Unit 3 Liquid Releases Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 2014 Number of Batch Releases 9 8 8 12 37 Total Time Period (min) 978 869 877 1320 4040 Maximum Time Period (min) 114 115 115 115 115 Average Time Period (min) 109 109 110 110 109 Minimum Time Period (min) 104 100 104 104 100 Average Stream Flow: Regulatory Guide 1.21 includes a section to report average stream flows. This data, for some plants, is used to determine dilution volume. However, at IPEC, the Hudson River stream flow is not applied to dilution calculations, in favor of the more conservative method of using only the dilution in the discharge canal, running north to south, parallel to the river, and servicing the plant.This conservative dilution volume is determined quarterly, applied for liquid offsite dose calculations (and all other determinations of diluted effluent), and reported on Tables 2A, in Section B of this report.Hudson River flow information remains available, however, from the Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey (USGS), or from web sites such as: http://nvywater.usgs,.ov/proiects/dialer plots/Hudson R at Poughkeepsie Freshwater Discharqe~htm Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 5 of 70 6. Abnormal Releases a) Liqu General Groundwater IPEC's groundwater quantification model involves a verification/calibration such that the annual release to the environment remains a function of annual precipitation and source term. The 2014 effluent dose was similar to that of 2013.The offsite dose associated with the groundwater pathway remains small. The total routine liquid effluent inclusive of the groundwater pathway contributes
<0.1% of the annual limit.Groundwater and storm water effluent flow rates and source term data are further described in Section H of this report. A breakdown of the total dose from the groundwater and storm water pathways is provided in Section E of this report (Radiological Impact on Man).Site Sewaqe System On 2/13/14, as part of routine monitoring, water containing H-3 was detected in the site sewer system. Although this event did involve the release of radiologically contaminated liquid indirectly into the environment, it was not an unmonitored release. The source was due to a leak in the liquid waste distillate system piping. This leakage was collected in the utility tunnel sump which had been previously rerouted to sewage to address an issue with sump pump operation.
As soon as this problem with rerouting was discovered, it was promptly addressed and input to the sewage system terminated.
Both the sewage and the utility tunnel sump are monitored points and part of the NRC IE 80-10 program. The estimated total number of curies of H-3 released was 3.8 Curies (from 1/13/14 to 2/26/14)with an estimated dose consequence of approximately 0.00004 mRem.b) Airborne-None 7. ODCM Reporting Requirements ODCM Part I requires reporting of various conditions during the year. These include effluent monitoring equipment out of service for periods exceeding 30 consecutive days, notification of any changes in the land use census, changes in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP), any time total curie content limitations in outdoor tanks is exceeded, or any other changes in the ODCM or Process Control Program (PCP).During this reporting period, the following ODCM required effluent monitoring equipment was out of service (OOS) for periods greater than 30 consecutive days: Instrument Effected Details Interval Eight pinhole leaks were discovered on the Unit 2 Radiation Monitoring System piping in the Service Water pipe chase.Unit 2 S/G & Affected piping was isolated for repair. Since the piping was Service 9/11/13 isolated, RMs 49, 46 and 53 were declared non-functional.
Initial Water to 1/19/15 piping repairs were completed in March during the 2014 refueling Monitors outage; additional repairs were noted and due to their location and R-49, R-46, & 463 days difficulty of repair, additional out of service time was experienced.
R-53 Further delays were experienced when another leak was discovered on the R-53 heat exchanger.
All leaks were ultimately repaired and the monitors were tested and returned to service.
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 6 of 70 10/18/13 to The vendor was brought in to repair the instrumentation.
Several 3/16/14 attempts to repair this instrument were unsuccessful.
The entire monitor detection circuit was replaced, including the power Unit 2 148 days supplies.
The detector was replaced and recalibrated.
The initial Condenser long outage and a follow-up outage were due the difficulty of Off-gas & diagnosis and repair and the fact that the failure appeared to be Monitor, intermittent.
Further complicating the repair was the fact that the R-45 5/27/14 ultimate cause of the spiking, the detector, was passing initial to 7/8/14 testing each time related components in the detection loop were replaced.
This cause was ultimately found and repaired with no 41 days further incidents.
Unit 2 5/22/14 Liquid Waste to Transmitter was replaced and verified tracking on 7/8/14. Work Level 9/18/14 order complete on 7/10/14. Final testing not completed until 13 Transmitter, Waste Distillate Tank was available for discharge.
CT-967 118 days Unit 2 Liquid Waste 10/16/14 Flow Rate to Difficulty was experienced in finding spare parts. Flow Measurement 1/23/15 measurement devices replaced and calibration completed on Devices, 1/13/15.CT971-FRE 99 days& FIE Unit 1 11/12/14 Stack Vent to Flow meter failed 2 year calibration.
Flow meter replaced and Gaseous 12/16/14 calibrated on 12/12/14.
Difficulties experienced with finding Effluent available parts and I&C resource issues.Monitor, R-60 34 days As required, compensatory sampling was performed for the above OOS monitors.Other Reporting Criteria: Tank Curie Limits During this reporting period, no tank curie limits in outdoor tanks were exceeded.Land Use Census During this reporting period, there were no changes to the Land Use Census.PCP changes: The Process Control Program document is a fleet procedure for Entergy.An editorial change to this procedure was completed in 2014. See details in Section G.ODCM changes: During this reporting period, there were no changes to the ODCM.
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 7 of 70 Indian Point Energy Center (Units 1, 2, and 3)RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT B. GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 2014 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 8 of 70 TABLE 1A INDIAN POINT I and 2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014)GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES A. Fission & Activation Gasesl i I Units Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Year :Est. Total 2014 % Error Qtr I Qtr 2 1. Total Release Ci 3.50E-01 3.97E-02 6.11E-02 6.04E-02 5.11E-01 J 25 2. Average release rate uCi/sec 4.50E-02 5.05E-03 7.69E-03 7.60E-03 =1.62E-02 B. lodines ___1. Total Iodine-131 Ci J0.00E+00
+/-25 2. AMerage release rate uCi/sec 0.00E+00 C. Particulates
_1. Total Release, with Ci -0.OOE+00 +/- 25 half-life
> 8 days 2. Average release rate uCi/sec -0.OOE+00 3. Gross Alpha Ci -0.OOE+00 +/- 25 i u. Intium _1. Total release Ci 2.93E+00 4.39E+00 4.56E+00 3.46E+00 1.53E+01 2. Average release rate uCi/sec 3.77E-01 5.58E-01 5.74E-01 4.35E-01 4.86E-01 E. Carbon-14 1. Total release Ci 2.60E+00 2.60E+00 2.60E+00 2.60E+00 1.04E+01 2. Average release rate uCi/sec 3.34E-01 3.31 E-01 3.27E-01 3.27E-01 3.30E-01-Indicates
< MDA Qtr I Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4..............
... .........2014 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 9 of 70 TABLE IC INDIAN POINT 1 and 2 CONTINUOUS GASEOUS EFFLUENTS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014)es Released ................
Year ission Gases Ya ]Units Qtr I Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 2014 IX -133 Ci O.OOE+00 1 Nuclid 1) F... .Total for Period.
- Ci_ 0..O E+00 O.0E+ 0 0.0E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00....... ... .......................
............
......... ............
.... ... ..... .. ....... ... .. ......... ..... ....... .........
....................
.. ..... .... ..... ...... ..... .. ........ ............
.... , 2) lodines 1-131 Ci ---O.OOE+00-133 Ci ---O.OOE+00 1-135 Ci -O.OOE+00 Total for Period Ci O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 3) Particulates Co-58 Ci --O.OOE+00Ci 0.00E+00 0.001E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.00E+00.........
.......... ........ ..... .. .... .. ..........
..........
..... .... ..Indicates
< MDA Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 10 of 70 TABLE IC INDIAN POINT 1 and 2 -BATCH GASEOUS EFFLUENTS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014).Nuclides Released 1) Fission Gases Units QtrlI Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Year Qtr 4 2014 Ar-41 Ci 5.84E-02 3.18E-02 3.49E-02 4.31E-02 1.68E-01 Kr-85 Ci 0.OOE+00 Kr-85m Ci 2.20E-04 1.45E-04 2.98E-04 6.63E-04 Kr-87 Ci 1.75E-04 -9.52E-05 2.23E-04 4.93E-04 Kr-88 Ci 3.87E-04 -2.40E-04 5.43E-04 1.17E-03 Xe-1 31 m Ci 2.37E-04 -2.37E-04 Xe-133 Ci 2.55E-01 7.92E-03 2.32E-02 1.15E-02 2.98E-01 XA-i 33m Ci 2.OOE-04 -2.OOE-04 Xe-135 Ci 3.48E-02 -2.32E-03 4.17E-03 4.13E-02 X)e-135m Ci 4.84E-04 -2.08E-04 5.50E-04 1.24E-03 Xe-1 38 Ci 1.16E-04 1. 16E-04 Total for Period
- Ci 3.50E-01 3.97E-02 6.11E-02 6.05E-02 5.11E-01 2) lodines! ....... .........
... i ... ... ...... ..... .. .... .............................
...Not Applicable for Batch Releases.... ] ... .. ....... ...... ....... i .... ... ... .... ....3) Particulates Not Applicable for Batch Releases-indicates
< MDA Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 11 of 70 TABLE 1A INDIAN POINT 3 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014)GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES S............
... .. ..........
...................
.......................
........ ..........................A. Fission & Activation Gases, U~nits Qtr 1 Q tr .....Q ......... .... .. .... ..... ............
... .... ... I .. ..................
...... ............
Year Est. Total 2014 % Error r3 i Otr 4 1. Total Release Ci 1.67E-02 1.63E-02 3.11E-02 3.55E-02 9.96E-02 +/-25 2. Average release rate uCi/sec 2.15E-03 2.07E-03 3.91 E-03 4.47E-03 3.16E-03.B. lodines 1. Total Iodine-1 31 Ci -0.OOE+00 +/-25 2. Average release rate uCi/sec -0.00E+00.C. Particulates
- 1. Total Release, with Ci --.00E+00 +/- 25 half-life
> 8 days 2. Average release rate uCi/sec -0.OOE+00 3. Gross Alpha Ci -0.00E+00 +/- 25 D. Tritium _ _1. Total release Ci 1.53E+00 1.92E+00 2.72E+00 1.67E+00 7.84E+00 +/-25 2. Average release rate uCi/sec 1.97E-01 2.44E-01 3.42E-01 2.10E-01 2.49E-01 E. Carbon-14
_ _1. Total release Ci 2.73E+00 2.73E+00 2.73E+00 2.73E+00 1.09E+01 2. Average release rate uCi/sec 3.50E-01 3.47E-01 3.43E-01 3.43E-01 3.46E-01 Qtr 1 1 Qtr 2-IndA............-Indicates
< MVDA Qtr 3 Qtr 4 2014.... ....... .... ..... .........i Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 12 of 70 TABLE IC INDIAN POINT 3 -CONTINUOUS GASEOUS EFFLUENTS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014).7... .. ..Nuclides Released 1) Fission Gases Qtr I Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Year 2014 Units Qtr 2 Ar-41 Ci -O.OOE+00 Xe-133 Ci -0.OOE+00 Xe-i 35 Ci 0.OOE+00 Total for Period Ci O0OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00.. .. ... .. ... .. ....... .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. ......................
..... ... .... ...... ...... ..... ........... ..................
........ ......... ... .. .............. ..... ..............
- 2) lodines 1-131 Ci --- 0.OOE+00 1-133 Ci -0.OOE+00 1-135 Ci -0.OOE+00 Total for Period Ci 0.00E+O0 0.00E÷00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00.. ............ ..........
.... .. ........... ..............
..... .. ...... ..............
... ...... .... .......................
..... .. ... .. ..... ... ..........
...........................
..... ..... .. ....3) Particulates Total for Period Jt j001 +00 O.0OOE+0O O.O0O 0.OOE+00I 0.OOE+00 I-indicates
< MDA............... ........ .. ..
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 13 of 70 TABLE IC INDIAN POINT 3 -BATCH GASEOUS EFFLUENTS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014)Nuclides Released 1) Fission Gases Qtr 1 Qtr 3 Year Qtr 4 2014 Units Qtr 2-.4.Ar-41 Ci 1.30E-02 1.39E-02 1.29E-02 1.53E-02 5.51E-02 Kr-85 Ci --. 0.OOE+00 Kr-85m Ci --1.16E-05 1.45E-05 2.61 E-05 Kr-87 Ci --. 0.OOE+00 Kr-88 Ci --. 0.OOE+00 Xe-131m Ci --6.21E-05 6.21E-05 Xe-1 33 Ci 3.64E-03 2.45E-03 1.72E-02 1.95E-02 4.28E-02 Xe-133m Ci 8.71E -06 1.37E-04 1.36E-04 2.82E-04 Xe-135 Ci 3.17E-05 8.65E-04 5.53E-04 1.45E-03 Xe-135m Ci 0.OOE+00 Total for Period Ci 1.67E-02 1.64E-02 3.11I-02 3.565-02 9.97E-02 2) lodines. -:-.. ........ .... .... ........ .... ......... ............................... -". ......... ... ... .... .... ..... ... .... ... .... ......!.. .. .......'Not Applicable for Batch Releases... .. .............
- 3) Particulates Not Applicable for Batch Releases....-... ........... ........... .. ..........
..... ......... .... ........ .... ..... ... ......t-Indicates
< MIDA Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 14 of 70 Indian Point Energy Center (Units 1, 2, and 3)RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT C. LIQUID EFFLUENTS 2014 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 15 of 70 TABLE 2A INDIAN POINT 1 and 2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014)LIQUID EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES A. Fission & Activation Products!1. Total Release (not including Tritium, Gr Alpha, & Gases)2. Average Diluted Conc Units Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Ci 8.08E-03 1.32E-02 uCi/ml 1.91E-11 1.74E-11 Qtr 3 1.92E-03 2.22E-12 Year Est. Total Qtr 4 2014 % Error 9.16E-03 3.24E-02 + 25 1.22E-11 1.16E-11 I h I &B. Tritium 1. Total Release 2. Average Dilutei Ci 3.16E+02 5.00E+01 1.5 d Conc uCi/ml 7.45E-07 6.61E-08 1.8 5E+01 OE-08 4-9.07E+01 4.72E+02 1.20E-07 1.69E-07+ 25+/- 25 1 I _______________
I D. Gross Alpha..1. Total Release [YCi X70 -"llI " E+000 +/-25 ).. .... ... j .. ....... ...... .... ... .... .. ........ .. .... ...... ... .. ..... .........................
...... ... ..........
...... .... ..........
.... ... ... ... ... ..........
....... ..... .... ... ....... .............................
.......... ...... .. .. ......... ... ... ...... ....... ....... ... .... ......E. Volume of Waste Released .1. Processed Waste (LW& NCD) liters 3.65E+06 3.20E+06 1.28E+06 1.99E+06 1.01E+07 +/- 10 2. Unprocessed (SGBD, SFDS, U1FD) liters 4.53E+07 4.63E+07 4.26E+07 4.14E+07 1.76E+08 +/- 10 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 4.24E+ 11 7.57E+ 11 8.63E+ 11 7.53E +11 2.80E+12 1 diA.... ... ... ...... ....-Indicates
< MDA Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 16 of 70 TABLE 2B LIQUID RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014)CONTINUOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT INDIAN POINT 1 and 2 Nuclides Release(d Units Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Year 2014 Qtr 4 Cs-137 Ci 6.34E-04 1.93E-03 1.52E-03 2.20E-03 6.29E-03 Ni-63 Ci , O.OOE+00 Sr-89 Ci ... O.E+00 Sr-90 Ci 1.30E-04 9.48E-05 8.41 E-05 2.86E-05 I 3.38E-04-.I I *I* 9 9 9...I Total for Period Ci 7.64E-04 2.02E-03 1.60E-03 2.23E-03 I 6.63E-03-. I I I .5. ~ -I £...... .. ........I H-3 (only) I Ci 6.16E-02 3.83E-02I 896E-02 1.07E-01 2.97E-01...............
...........
... ............ .... ..... ....................
.........
... ..........
.... ...........................
........ .... .... ............
...... .. ..........
..... .. ... .............
IDA.. ....... .........................
.. ..A.-......-Indicates
< M...............
......... ..... ....... .. ...... .... .. .. ..... .. .. ...... ..... .i.. ... , ..... ..........
.... ..... .. ....................
.... ... .... .. .-... ...... ... .. ... ... ... .. ..-
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 17 of 70 TABLE 2B INDIAN POINT 1 and 2 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014)BATCH RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT Nuclides Released Year 2014 Units Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Ag-11 Oin Ci 2.40E-04 4.77E-05 -2.88E-04 Co-58 Ci 1.23E-03 3.24E-03 2.83E-05 4.58E-04 4.96E-03 Co-60 Ci 2.71 E-03 2.78E-04 -8.88E-05 3.08E-03 Cs-137 Ci 1.04E-03 8.06E-06 4.41E-06 1.05E-03 Fe-55 Ci -1.50E-03 1.77E-04 1.01E-03 2.69E-03 Mn-54 Ci 6.14E-05 -6.14E-05 Ni-63 Ci 1.53E-03 4.54E-03 1.05E-04 2.49E-03 8.67E-03 Sb-125 Ci 4.92E-04 4.17E-04 -2.89E-03 3.80E-03 Te-123m Ci 1.96E-05 2.19E-05 -4.15E-05 Te-125m Ci 1.09E-03 1.09E-03 Total for Period T Ci 17.32E-03 1.11E-02 3.15E-04 6.94E-03 2.57E-02 IDissolved
& Entrained Gas Kr-85 Ci J 0.OOE+00 1)Xe-133 Ci 1.83E-0 4 -- 1.83E-04[ oal for Period Ci 1.83E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +00 1.83E-04 Indicates
< MDA..F..... ... .... .... .... ... ..... ................ ....... .......-.~.J ..... ... ..... ............
.... .. ...... .. ... .. .... ....... ...................
..... ......... ..............
.. ....... ........ ..... ..i Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 18 of 70 TABLE 2A INDIAN POINT 3 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014)LIQUID EFFLUENTS
-SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES Year i Est. TotalýA. Fission & Activation Products!A"_Fission&_Actiatio PdtUnits Qtr I Qtr2 Qtrtr4 2013 % Error 1. Total Release (not including Ci 8.08E-04 7.61E-04 2.65E-03 3.75E-03 7.97E-03 25 Tritium, Gr Alpha, & Gases) Ci 8.08E-04 7.61E-04 2.65E-03 3.75E-03 7.97E-03 +_25 2. Average Diluted Conc uCi/ml 1.91E-12 1.01E-12 3.07E-12 4.98E-12 2.85E-12 ,B. Tritium 1. Total Release Ci 7.62E+01 1.17E+01 7.07E+00 7.32E+01 1.68E+02 + 25 2. Average Diluted Conc uCi/ml 1.80E-07 1.55E-08 8.19E-09 9.72E-08 6.01 E-08 C. Dissolved
& Entrained Gases 1. Total Release Ci 1.OOE-05 2.89E-05 9.82E-06 6.27E-05 1.11E-04 +/- 25 2. AverageDiluted Conc uCi/ml 2.36E-14 3.82E-14 0.OOE+00 8.33E-14 3.98E-14 D. Gross Alpha 1."Total Release ci 1 I I000E+00 25 L.. V J~I f %A/ t.1 0 1 4O~I~IO vl-- V IUIVI Ul 0 a l !u 1. Processed Fluids (Mon Tanks) liters 2.32E+05 2.08E+05 2.08E+05 3.14E+05 9.62E+05 2. Unprocessed Fluids (SGs) liters 3.43E+06 1.62E+06 2.61E+06 1.64E+06 9.30E+06 F. Volume of Dilution Water liters 14.24E+11 7.11 8.63E+11 7.53E+11 2.80E+12 I 10-indicates
< MDA i!i Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 19 of 70 TABLE 2B INDIAN POINT 3 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT (Jan -Dec 2014)BATCH and CONTINUOUS RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT 1 Batc h F-}.. ...I.ission/Activation Products Units Qtr 1 Qtr 4 2013 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Ag-11im Ci 1.43E-05 --1.43E-05 Co-58 Ci 5.78E-05 4.46E-05 4.56E-05 3.82E-05 1.86E-04 Co-60 Ci 7.74E-05 3.04E-04 2.62E-04 3.57E-04 1.OOE-03 Cs-137 Ci 1.99E-05 6.07E-05 -8.06E-05 Fe-55 Ci 1.22E-04 2.60E-04 7.35E-04 1.12E-03 Mn-54 Ci 1.34E-06 --1.34E-06 Ni-63 Ci 4.61 E-04 2.47E-04 1.43E-03 1.53E-03 3.67E-03 Sb-125 Ci 8.27E-05 1.29E-04 5.96E-04 1.09E-03 1.90E-03 Te-123m Ci 8.01E-06 2.49E-06 1.05E-05 Total orPed Ci 8.09E-04 7.63E-04 2.65E-03 3.75E-03 7.98E-03 Dissolved and Entrained Gas (Batch ....Xe-1 33 Ci 1.OOE-05 2.89E-05 9.82E-06 6.27E-05 1.11 E-04 Xe-135 Ci -0.OOE+00[ Total for Period Ci 1.OOE-05 2.89E-05 9.82E-06 6.27E-05 1.11 E-04 Contin~iou... ... .. ... ... .(S( RIov.dnv.n)
- i. -H-3 (only) Ci 6.28E-03 38E0 6.403 2.62E-03...... ....i.. .... .. ... ....... .............
i ...... ....... .. ... .... .. .... ...... ...... 2 .... .... ....... ..... .... ........ ......... .... ..i ..'- indicates
< mda.....................
....... ... .. ....... ........ ...... ... ..... .... ..... .........
.. ... ... ........... ....... .-........ ................
..........2 ..... .. ... ..~ ~ ~~.. : ... ..... ... ................ ................
... .... .. ..... .................
.............
...............
...... ..................
........ ..... ..... ......................I Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 20 of 70 Indian Point Energy Center (Units 1, 2, and 3)RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT D. SOLID WASTE 2014 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 21 of 70 Units 1 and 2 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 (all identified isotopes are included)Waste Stream: Resins, Filters, and Evap Bottoms LWS Resin Waste Volume Curies % Error (Ci)Class ft 3 m 3 Shipped A 2.32E+02 6.57E+00 1.17E+00 +/- 25%B 1.15E+02 3.26E+00 2.80E+01 +/- 25%C 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/- 25%All 3.47E+02 9.83E+00 2.92E+01 +/- 25%Waste Stream : Dry Active Waste Soil / Bebris Intermodal DAW 40' Sea Land DAW/Dirt; B-25 Box DAW 20' Sea Land Waste Volume Curies % Error (Ci)Class ft 3 m 3 Shipped A 4.38E+04 1.24E+03 1.26E+00 +/-25%B 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%C 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%All 4.38E+04 1.24E+03 1.26E+00 +/-25%Waste Stream : Irradiated Components Waste Volume Curies % Error (Ci)Class ft 3 m 3 Shipped A 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%B O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%C 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%All 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%Waste Stream: Other Waste Waste Volume Curies % Error (Ci)Class ft 3 m 3 Shipped A 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%B 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OE+00 +/-25%C 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%All O.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%Waste Stream: Sum of All 4 Categories LWS Resin DAW / Dirt; B-25 Box DAW 20' Sea Land DAW 40' Sea Land Soil / Debris -Intermodal Waste Volume Curies % Error (Ci)Class ft 3 m 3 Shipped A 4.40E+04 1.25E+03 2.43E+00 +/-25%B 1.1 5E+02 3.26E+00 2.80E+01 +1-25%C 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%All 4.41 E+04 1.25E+03 3.04E+01 +1-25%Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major Volume Waste Type Shown Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 22 of 70 Units 1 and 2 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination 17 70 Hittman Transport Hittman Transport R & R Trucking Inc.Energy Solutions
-Bear Creek Energy Solutions
-GRF Memphis Processing Facility 1 Resins, Filters, and Evaporator Bottoms Waste Class A Nuclide Name Percent Abundance H-3 0.53%C-1 4 0.15%Mn-54 0.77%Fe-55 3.18%Co-57 0.17%Co-58 1.17%Co-60 24.39%Ni-59 0.25%Ni-63 46.89%Sr-90 0.10%Ag-110m 2.02%Sb-1 25 12.79%Cs-1 34 0.25%Cs-1 37 6.96%Ce-144 0.25%Pu-238 0.01%Pu-239 0.00%Pu-241 0.14%Am-241 0.00%Cm-242 0.00%Cm-243 0.00%Curies 6.15E-03 1.78E-03 8.95E-03 3.71 E-02 1.99E-03 1.36E-02 2.84E-01 2.93E-03 5.47E-01 1.18E-03 2.36E-02 1.49E-01 2.87E-03 8.12E-02 2.90E-03 5.56E-05 2.13E-06 1.57E-03 1.15E-05 9.83E-07 3.51 E-05 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 23 of 70 Units 1 and 2 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Resins, Filters, and Evaporator Bottoms Waste Class B Nuclide Name H-3 C-1 4 Mn-54 Fe-55 Fe-59 Co-57 Co-58 Co-60 Ni-63 Zn-65 Sr-90 Zr-95 Nb-94 Ag-11Orn Sb-1 25 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Percent Abundance 0.04%4.07%0.16%17.36%0.00%0.07%0.14%13.66%58.53%0.00%0.11%0.00%0.03%0.74%3.02%0.10%1.97%Curies 1.19E-02 1.14E+00 4.36E-02 4.87E+00 6.72E-06 1.90E-02 3.90E-02 3.83E+00 1.64E+01 2.41 E-05 3.07E-02 8.83E-06 8.93E-03 2.09E-01 8.48E-01 2.72E-02 5.53E-01 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 24 of 70 Units 1 and 2 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Resins, Filters, and Evaporator Bottoms Waste Class All Nuclide Name Percent Abundance H-3 C-14 Mn-54 Fe-55 Fe-59 Co-57 Co-58 Co-60 Ni-59 Ni-63 Zn-65 Sr-90 Zr-95 Nb-94 Ag-11im Sb-125 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Ce-144 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243 0.062%3.92%0.18%16.79%0.00%0.07%0.18%14.09%0.01%58.06%0.00%0.11%0.00%0.03%0.80%3.41%0.10%2.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%Curies 1.81 E-02 1.14E+00 5.26E-02 4.90E+00 6.72E-06 2.09E-02 5.26E-02 4.11E+00 2.93E-03 1.70E+01 2.41 E-05 3.18E-02 8.83E-06 8.93E-03 2.32E-01 9.97E-01 3.01 E-02 6.34E-01 2.90E-03 5.56E-05 2.13E-06 1.57E-03 1.15E-05 9.83E-07 3.51 E-05 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 25 of 70 Units 1 and 2 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Dry Active Waste Waste Class A Nuclide Name Percent Abundance H-3 C-14 Mn-54 Fe-55 Co-57 Co-58 Co-60 Ni-63 Tc-99 Ag-110m Sb-1 25 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ce-144 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243 0.07%0.00%0.50%34.15%0.11%5.81%38.30%14.12%0.11%1.64%3.14%0.00%1.84%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%Curies 8.87E-04 5.24E-05 6.33E-03 4.30E-01 1.41 E-03 7.31 E-02 4.82E-01 1.78E-01 1.32E-03 2.06E-02 3.95E-02 1.30E-05 2.31 E-02 2.27E-03 1.50E-05 4.55E-06 4.53E-04 1.37E-05 1.39E-06 1.49E-05 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 26 of 70 Units 1 and 2 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Dry Active Waste Waste Class All Nuclide Name Percent Abundance H-3 C-14 Mn-54 Fe-55 Co-57 Co-58 Co-60 Ni-63 Tc-99 Ag-11im Sb-1 25 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ce-144 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243 0.07%0.00%0.50%34.15%0.11%5.81%38.30%14.12%0.11%1.64%3.14%0.00%1.84%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%Curies 8.87E-04 5.24E-05 6.33E-03 4.30E-01 1.41 E-03 7.31 E-02 4.82E-01 1.78E-01 1.32E-03 2.06E-02 3.95E-02 1.30E-05 2.31 E-02 2.27E-03 1.50E-05 4.55E-06 4.53E-04 1.37E-05 1.39E-06 1.49E-05 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 27 of 70 Units I and 2 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Sum of All 4 Categories Waste Class A Nuclide Name H-3 C-1 4 Mn-54 Fe-55 Co-57 Co-58 Co-60 Ni-59 Ni-63 Sr-90 Tc-99 Ag-11Orn Sb-1 25 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ce-144 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243 Percent Abundance 0.29%0.08%0.63%19.25%0.14%3.58%31.61%0.12%29.88%0.05%0.05%1.82%7.78%0.12%4.30%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%Curies 7.04E-03 1.83E-03 1.53E-02 4.67E-01 3.40E-03 8.67E-02 7.67E-01 2.93E-03 7.25E-01 1.18E-03 1.32E-03 4.42E-02 1.89E-01 2.88E-03 1.04E-01 5.16E-03 7.06E-05 6.68E-06 2.02E-03 2.52E-05 2.37E-06 5.OOE-05 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 28 of 70 Units I and 2 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Sum of All 4 Categories Waste Class B Nuclide Name Percent Abundance Curies H-3 0.04% 1.19E-02 C-14 4.07% 1.14E+00 Mn-54 0.16% 4.36E-02 Fe-55 17.36% 4.87E+00 Fe-59 0.00% 6.72E-06 Co-57 0.07% 1.90E-02 Co-58 0.14% 3.90E-02 Co-60 13.66% 3.83E+00 Ni-63 58.53% 1.64E+01 Zn-65 0.00% 2.41 E-05 Sr-90 0.11% 3.07E-02 Zr-95 0.00% 8.83E-06 Nb-94 0.03% 8.93E-03 Ag-11Orn 0.74% 2.09E-01 Sb-125 3.02% 8.48E-01 Cs-I 34 0.10% 2.72E-02 Cs-137 1.97% 5.53E-01 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 29 of 70 Units I and 2 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Sum of All 4 Categories Waste Class All Nuclide Name Percent Abundance Curies H-3 C-14 Mn-54 Fe-55 Fe-59 Co-57 Co-58 Co-60 Ni-59 Ni-63 Zn-65 Sr-90 Zr-95 Nb-94 Tc-99 Ag-11im Sb-1 25 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Ce-144 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243 0.06%3.76%0.19%17.51%0.00%0.07%0.41%15.09%0.01%56.25%0.00%0.11%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.83%3.40%0.10%2.16%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.89E-02 1.14E+00 5.89E-02 5.33E+00 6.72E-06 2.24E-02 1.26E-01 4.60E+00 2.93E-03 1.71 E+01 2.41 E-05 3.18E-02 8.83E-06 8.93E-03 1.32E-03 2.53E-01 1.04E+00 3.01 E-02 6.57E-01 5.16E-03 7.06E-05 6.68E-06 2.02E-03 2.52E-05 2.37E-06 5.OOE-05 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 30 of 70 Unit 3 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 (all identified isotopes are included)Waste Stream : Resins, Filters, and Evaporator Bottoms Primary Resin 14-190 Volume Curies % Error (Ci)Class ft 3 m 3 Shipped A ..............................
I ..........
0 + 0 ... 0 .0 E 0 .. ............
.... ..0 ..........5 A .QE+Q0. E+'00 0.OOE+0Q +14-25%........................
..... .... .1 3 5 0 ....... ....... ..........0 ...........
...9.O 1 .... .. ....I2 5 ....B 1.35E+'02 3.82E+00O 6.92E+01 /-25%0 0OOE+0O _ .OOE-'-0 0-.OOE+00 -f-- 25%All 1.35E+02 3.82E+00 6.92E+01 +/-25%Waste Stream Dry Active Waste U-nit 3-DAW- 20 SeaIand 'U3 DAW B-25 20 Intermodal Sil Waste Volume Curies % Error (Ci)Class t 3 m 3 Shipped..............
.. C ~ .... .... t 3 h p e A _ 1.05E+04 2.97E+02 .I 2.62E-01 +1-25%B 0.OOE+0O j Q.OOE+00 0.OOE+QQ +/-25%.........
.... .. .... .... ... ...... .. ....O ' O 0.. 0 0 ...... .... .... i 0 .... ¥ 0 I...........
-0 0 E + ( 0 ... .. ..+ i 2 .. .C 0.OOE+0Q 0.O0E+00 O.OOE+00 +/-25%i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~- .........
Aii ........ .-050- .... ............
........... ...
....All 1.05E+04 2.97E+02 2.62E-01. /25% __Waste Stream : Irradiated Components
.........
... ..... .. ...... ... ............ ........ ............
........... ...............................
..... ... ....... ......................
... ................
.. i ............. ...... .........
... ......... .. ............
..... .. ...............
... .... ........Waste Volume Curies %Error (Ci)Cl'a-ss- .m 3 Shipped 0.00E+00~~~~~~~~~~
... .... 0.0+0 ...... ..... °66-: ...-S O.OOE+0O O.QQE+00 O.OOE+00 +/-25%..B.................
.O.OOE+O0 Q O.00E+00 i0.OOE+00
+/-25%C 0.OOE+O0 0.OOE-+00 0.OOE+OO +/-25%. ......All .0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 +/-25%Waste Stream .__.Other Waste i Waste Volume_ Curies %Error (C)Class f 3 m 3 Shipped.....W ~ s e ...- ...........
..... .~ m ... ..........
.
.... .... .... .... C u r..s .. ... .. o .........)B6 O.00E+00 0.00E+00 +/-25%B 0.OOE+O0 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 +/-25%.. ...........................
.... .............
...... .. ............
.... .......... .... ........ .... ..... .............. ..............
.... ..... ...All O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 +1-25%Waste Stream : Sum of All 4 Categories
!Primary Resin 14-190 .. ..Unit 3 DAW-20' Sealand U3 DAW B-25 !20' Intermodal Soil.... .. ._ ....i I I ........ .. .. _L.... .. .... .... .. .. ... .i..... ..ii ..-._ o l io ...... .i ....i. i i. i .ii........
....... ....................
...... .... ..... .... ..... .............
........ ........ ..S o i Waste _ Volume Curies % Error (Ci)Class ft 3 m 3 Shipped A 1.05E+04 2.97E-+o02--
.2.62E-01 +/-25%B 1.35E+02 I 3.82E+00 6.92E+01 +/-25%C 0.OOE+00 ..00E+00 -0.OOE+00
+/-25%All 1.06E+04 3.01 E+02 6.95E+01 +/-25%Combined Waste Type Shipment, Major Volume Waste Type Shown Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 31 of 70 Unit 3 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination 3 7 1 Hittman Transport Hittman Transport Hittman Transport Energy Solutions Gallagher Road Energy Solutions Bear Creek Energy Solutions Services, Inc.Resins, Filters, and Evaporator Bottoms Waste Class B Nuclide Name C-1 4 Mn-54 Fe-55 Co-57 Co-58 Co-60 Ni-59 Ni-63 Sr-90 Sb-125 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ce-144 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243 Percent Abundance 0.30%0.19%4.41%0.04%0.05%10.63%0.88%70.71%0.04%1.46%0.74%10.22%0.04%0.01%0.00%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%Curies 2.1OE-01 1.33E-01 3.05E+00 2.43E-02 3.16E-02 7.35E+00 6.08E-01 4.89E+01 2.70E-02 1.01E+00 5.12E-01 7.07E+00 2.66E-02 3.25E-03 5.96E-04 2.04E-01 1.24E-04 1.55E-05 1.53E-04 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 32 of 70 Unit 3 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Resins, Filters, and Evaporator Bottoms Waste Class All Nuclide Name Percent Abundance C-14 0.30%Mn-54 0.19%Fe-55 4.41%Co-57 0.04%Co-58 0.05%Co-60 10.63%Ni-59 0.88%Ni-63 70.71%Sr-90 0.04%Sb-1 25 1.46%Cs-1 34 0.74%Cs-1 37 10.22%Ce-1 44 0.04%Pu-238 0.01%Pu-239 0.00%Pu-241 0.30%Am-241 0.00%Cm-242 0.00%Cm-243 0.00%Dry Active Waste Waste Class A Nuclide Name Percent Abundance C-14 3.00%Mn-54 0.17%Fe-55 5.78%Co-60 20.92%Ni-63 62.76%Sr-90 0.26%Cs-1 34 0.36%Cs-1 37 6.75%Curies 2.1 OE-01 1.33E-01 3.05E+00 2.43E-02 3.16E-02 7.35E+00 6.08E-01 4.89E+01 2.70E-02 1.01 E+00 5.12E-01 7.07E+00 2.66E-02 3.25E-03 5.96E-04 2.04E-01 1.24E-04 1.55E-05 1.53E-04 Curies 7.84E-03 4.44E-04 1.51 E-02 5.48E-02 1.64E-01 6.84E-04 9.32E-04 1.77E-02 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 33 of 70 Unit 3 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Dry Active Waste Waste Class All Nuclide Name C-14 Mn-54 Fe-55 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Sum of All 4 Categories Waste Class A Nuclide Name C-14 Mn-54 Fe-55 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Cs-134 Cs-137 Sum of All 4 Categories Waste Class B Nuclide Name C-14 Mn-54 Fe-55 Co-57 Co-58 Co-60 Ni-59 Ni-63 Sr-90 Sb-1 25 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ce-144 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243 Percent Abundance 3.00%0.17%5.78%20.92%62.76%0.26%0.36%6.75%Percent Abundance 3.00%0.17%5.78%20.92%62.76%0.26%0.36%6.75%Percent Abundance 0.30%0.19%4.41%0.04%0.05%10.63%0.88%70.71%0.04%1.46%0.74%1O.22%0.04%0.01%0.00%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%Curies 7.84E-03 4.44E-04 1.51 E-02 5.48E-02 1.64E-01 6.84E-04 9.32E-04 1.77E-02 Curies 7.84E-03 4.44E-04 1.51 E-02 5.48E-02 1.64E-01 6.84E-04 9.32E-04 1.77E-02 Curies 2.1OE-01 1.33E-01 3.05E+00 2.43E-02 3.16E-02 7.35E+00 6.08E-01 4.89E+01 2.70E-02 1.01 E+00 5.12E-01 7.07E+00 2.66E-02 3.25E-03 5.96E-04 2.04E-01 1.24E-04 1.55E-05 1.53E-04 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 34 of 70 Unit 3 Solid Waste Shipped Offsite for Disposal and Estimates of Major Nuclides by Waste Class and Stream 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2014 Percent Cutoff: 0 Sum of All 4 Categories Waste Class All Nuclide Name C-14 Mn-54 Fe-55 Co-57 Co-58 Co-60 Ni-59 Ni-63 Sr-90 Sb-1 25 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ce-1 44 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Am-241 Cm-242 Cm-243 Percent Abundance 0.31%0.19%4.42%0.04%0.05%10.67%0.88%70.68%0.04%1.45%0.74%10.20%0.04%0.01%0.00%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%Curies 2.18E-01 1.33E-01 3.07E+00 2.43E-02 3.16E-02 7.40E+00 6.08E-01 4.91 E+01 2.77E-02 1.01 E+00 5.12E-01 7.08E+00 2.66E-02 3.25E-03 5.96E-04 2.04E-01 1.24E-04 1.55E-05 1.53E-04 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 35 of 70 Indian Point Energy Center (Units 1, 2, and 3)RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT E. RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN Jan 1, 2014 -Dec 31, 2014 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 36 of 70 RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN Routine Effluent Dose Calculations:
The Radiological Impact on Man due to radioactive effluent from the site is determined from NRC approved modeling, per Regulatory Guide 1.109 and NUREG 0133. Calculations are divided into 3 categories:
Noble Gases, Particulates and Iodine, and Liquid Releases (fish and invertebrate consumption).
This modeling involves conservative dose calculations to Adult, Teen, Child, and Infant age groups. Furthermore, dose modeling is performed for six separate organs as well as the total body dose. This well-established industry model provides doses (as a result of plant effluent) to a hypothetical maximally exposed individual offsite. While ALL age groups and organs are considered, it is this maximum value that is provided in the tables that follow.An approved computer code is used to perform liquid and gaseous dose calculations according to the models and parameters presented in the Indian Point Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). This information is stored in a database on site to enhance dose tracking and information management.
Site airborne effluent dose calculations include annual average dispersion and deposition factors, averaged from data collected over approximately ten year periods. When new data is averaged (approximately every ten years)the modeling is updated and used in subsequent airborne effluent calculations.
Liquid offsite dose calculations involve fish and invertebrate consumption pathways only, as determined appropriate in the ODCM. While the ODCM identified some site-specific dose factors, the bulk of this information is obtained directly from Regulatory Guide 1.109 and NUREG 0133.Details of the calculations, site-specific data, and their bases are presented in the ODCM.Carbon-14 (C-14): Concentrations and offsite dose from C-14 were determined from sampling at Indian Point #3 from August 1980 to June 1982, during a study conducted by the NY State Department of Health (C. Kunz, later published and incorporated into NCRP 81). The annual C-14 curies released, as determined from this study, were consistent with NUREG 0017, Rev. 1. Data was then normalized to a maximum expected annual total, based on rated electrical capacity, (approximately 1000 MW(e) maintained for the entire year). Once the curies released were established, dose calculations were performed per the station ODCM, which uses all C-14 released to determine inhalation doses, and 26% of the total (determined to be Carbon Dioxide form), to determine the ingestion doses, in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.109.In 2010, IPEC and other facilities combined historical data with the application of an EPRI model designed to estimate C-14 releases, given some key site-specific plant parameters (mass of the primary coolant, average thermal neutron cross section, rated MW, etc.). The estimates from this model, for IPEC, closely match the measured observations of 1982.The maximum annual C-14 release information is as follows: Maximum (Bounding)
Annual C-14 releases from IPEC I " [.4 1 .., I UIIIL d[, r I.Liquid Effluent C'4 Released Curies 0.07 0.07 Total Airborne C14 Released Curies 11.19 11.05 Airborne C14 as C02 Curies 2.91 2.87 Airborne Effluent Child TB Dose, C14 mrem 0.0690 0.0675 Airborne Effluent Child Bone Dose, C14 mrem 0.346 0.338 Liquid Effluent Child TB Dose, C14 mrem 0.00117 0.00116 Liquid Effluent Child Bone Dose, C14 mrem 0.00583 0.00577 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 37 of 70 The bounding values were then normalized with actual effective full power days (EFFD) to yield more accurate year to year annual airborne curies and mrem for each unit. A small liquid effluent component is maintained at IPEC as a result of data accumulated in the 1983 study (Kunz). Tables 1A (shown earlier) include the airborne curie data for the current year. The following section (Radiological Impact on Man) includes the dose information.
C-14 doses are grouped with "Iodine and Particulate" and reported in Table D in the following Radiological Impact on Man tables, for each unit. Table "C" provides doses from this category excluding C-14, to facilitate historical comparisons.
However, since C-14 is grouped as a particulate, the total dose for this isotope needs to be added to all other lodines and Particulates, for comparison of the singular dose limit for this category.Therefore, table "D" includes dose from all categories of this group (Iodine, Particulate, Tritium, and Carbon-14), for appropriate comparison of the dose limits.C-14 doses (alone) for the current year are provided (for information) in the following table: Calculated Annual C-14 releases from IPEC, 2014 Unit 2 1 Unit 3 Airborne Effluent Child TB Dose, C14 mrem 0.0642 0.0665 Airborne Effluent Child Bone Dose, c 1 4 mrem 0.322 0.333 The airborne effluent dose from C-14 is distributed evenly over the year and applied to a total Iodine and Particulate dose in Table "D" following this section.Members of the Public: Members of the public visiting the site receive minimal dose as a result of onsite releases because of the relatively insignificant total amount of time they are on site, as well as the immeasurably low levels of dose at the critical receptors.
Their doses can be calculated from standard ODCM methodology, with typical occupancy factors employed.
These factors are determined by comparing a conservative assumption for their expected hours on site, to 8760 hours0.101 days <br />2.433 hours <br />0.0145 weeks <br />0.00333 months <br /> (the number of hours in a year, used in calculations in the ODCM).example 1: Several students visit the site for an 8-hour guided tour.Their occupancy factor is: 8 / 8760 or 0.0009.example 2: A man drives his wife to work and drops her off at the security gate each morning, with a total stay-time on site for 2 minutes per day. His occupancy factor is calculated as follows: 2 min/60 min/hr =0.0333 hr; 0.0333 / 8760 = 3.8E-6.While onsite meteorological factors (dispersion and deposition) may be as high as a factor of ten higher than those used by the ODCM for routine effluents, these occupancy factors, when multiplied by doses calculated per the ODCM, demonstrate that dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC within the site boundary is negligible.
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 38 of 70 Groundwater:
Curies and dose contribution from activity discovered in onsite groundwater and storm drain pathways during the year are discussed in more detail in Section H. The offsite dose calculation involves multiple source term measurements, as well as computations for release and dilution flow. A summary of the quantification methodology, and the resulting calculated doses, is provided at the end of Section H. The Total Dose table below provides a means to compare ground water doses with those of other components making up the total offsite dose.Total Dose: Unit and pathway-specific dose data can be found on the Radiological Impact on Man tables following this discussion.
For simplicity and to demonstrate compliance with 40CFR190, the following table indicates the maximum hypothetical Total Dose to an individual from operation of the facility, including any measured direct shine component from the site property: Year: 2014 U Total Body Max Organ 40 CFR 190 limit === IPEC 25 mrem 75 mrem Routine Airborne Effluents' Units 1 and 2 2.65E-03 2.65E-03 Routine Liquid Effluents Units 1 and 2 4.18E-04 9.30E-04 Liquid Releases of C14 Units 1 and 2 1.17E-03 5.83E-03 Airborne Releases of C14 Units 1 and 2 6.42E-02 3.22E-01 Routine Airborne Effluents' Unit 3 1.32E-03 1.32E-03 Routine Liquid Effluents Unit 3 4.09E-05 1.88E-04 Liquid Releases of C14 Unit 3 1.17E-03 5.83E-03 Airborne Releases of C14 Unit 3 6.65E-02 3.33E-01 Ground Water & Storm Drain Totals IPEC 2 1.91 E-05 7.70E-05 Direct Shine from areas such as dry cask storage, radwaste storage, SG IPEC 3 2.10E-01 2.10E-01 Mausoleum, etc.Indian Point Energy Center IPEC 3.47E-01 8.82E-01 Total Dose, per 40 CFR 190 Note 1: Routine airborne dose in this table is conservatively represented as a sum of Iodine, Particulate, and Tritium dose (excluding C-14, in mrem) with a mrem term added from noble gas gamma air energy (mrad, expressed as mrem). This 'addition' does not represent a real dose and is listed here solely to help demonstrate compliance with 40CFR190. (Doses by type of release and comparison to the specific limits of 10CFR50 Appendix I are summarized on the following pages.)Note 2: Groundwater curie and dose calculations are provided in Section H.Note 3: 40CFR190 requires the reporting of total dose, including that of direct shine. Direct shine dose from sources other than dry cask are indistinguishable from background.
Direct shine dose is determined from TLDs near the dry cask area and site boundary, compared with REMP TLDs and historical values, and corrected with occupancy factors to determine a bounding, worst case assessment of direct shine dose to a real individual.
These doses are slightly higher than those of the previous year due to additional storage on the Independent Spent fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). Details of each year's dose evaluation are available on site from Radiation Protection.
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 39 of 70 INDIAN POINT UNITS 1 and 2 NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN JANUARY -DECEMBER 2014 Maximum exposed individual doses in mrem or mrad A. LIQUID DOSES Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 ANNUAL Organ Dose (mrem) 2.92E-04 3.27E-04 8.39E-05 2.27E-04 9.30E-04 Applicable Limit (mrem) 5 5 5 5 10 Percent of Limit 5.83E-03 6.54E-03 1.68E-03 4.54E-03 9.30E-03 Age Group Child Child Child Child Child Critical Organ Bone bone Bone Bone Bone I Adult Total Body (mrem) 2.06E-04 8.15E-05 4.64E-05 8.48E-05 4.18E-04 J Applicable Limit (mrem) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 3.0 Percent of Limit 1.37E-02 5.43E-03 3.09E-03 5.66E-03 1.39E-02j B. AIRBORNE NOBLE GAS DOSES_ ...........
_. ....... Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 ANNUAL Gamma Air (mrad) 3.21E-05 1.24E-05 1.44E-05 1.78E-05 7.67E-05 I.Applicable Limit (mrad) 5 5 5 5 10 -Percent of Limit (%) 6.42E-04 2.48E-04 2.88E-04 3.56E-04 7.67E-04 Beta Air (mrad) 3.86E-05 7.92E-06 1.03E-05 1.19E-05 6.87E-05 Applicable Limit (mrad) 10 10 10 10 20 J Percent of Limit (%) 3.86E-04 7.92E-05 1.03E-04 1.19E-04 3.44E-04 ]C. AIRBORNE IODINE, PARTICULATE, & TRITIUM DOSES (excluding C-14, for info only)I I wir I td/t 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 ANNUAL Iodine/Part (mrem) 4.92E-04 7.35E-04 7.64E-04 5.79E-04 2.57E-03 Applicable Limit (mrem) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 15 Percent of Limit (%) 6.56E-03 9.80E-03 1.02E-02 7.72E-03 1.71E-02 Age Group Child Child Child Child Child Critical Organ Liver Liver Liver Liver Liver D. AIRBORNE IODINE, PARTICULATE, TRITIUM, and CARBON-14 DOSES Child TB Dose (mrem) 1.65E-02 1.68E-02 1.68E-02 1.66E-02 6.68E-02 Applicable Limit (mrem) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 15 Percent of Limit (%) 2.21 E-01 2.24E-01 2.24E-01 2.22E-01 4.45E-01"Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 ANNUAL Child Bone Dose (mrem) 8.05E-02 8.05E-02 8.05E-02 8.05E-02 3.22E-01.Applicable Limit (mrem) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 15 Percent of Limit (%) 1.07E+00 1.07E+00 1.07E+00 1.07E+00 2.15E+00 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 40 of 70 INDIAN POINT 3 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN JANUARY -DECEMBER 2014 Maximum exposed individual doses in mrem or mrad A. LIQUID DOSES ANNUAL Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr4 Organ Dose (mrem) 3.79E-05 1.06E-05 5.83E-05 8.1OE-05 1.88E-04 Applicable Limit (mrem) 5 5 5 5 10 i Percent of Limit (%) 7.57E-04 2.12E-04 1.17E-03 1.62E-03 1.88E-03 Age Group Child Child Child Child Child ,Critical Organ Bone Bone Bone Bone Bone ......Adult Total Body (mrem) 2.37E-05 3.92E-06 4.88E-06 1.66E-05 4.90E-05 Applicable Limit (mrem) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 3.0 Percent of Limit (%) 1.58E-03 2.61E-04 3.26E-04 1.1OE-03 1.63E-03 B. AIRBORNE NOBLE GAS DOSES _,_ _Qtr I Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 ANNUAL Gamma Air (mrad) 3.79E-06 3.99E-06 4.26E-06 4.94E-06 1.70E-05 Applicable Limit (mrad) 5 5 5 5 10 __.1 Percent of Limit 7.58E-05 7.98E-05 8.52E-05 9.88E-05 1.70E-04 Beta Air (mrad) 6.62E-06 6.83E-06 8.90E-06 1.02E-05 3.26E-05 Applicable Limit (mrad) 10 10 10 10 20 Percent of Limit 6.62E-05 6.83E-05 8.90E-05 1.02E-04 1.63E-04 ,C. AIRBORNE IODINE, PARTICULATE, & TRITIUM DOSES (excluding C-14, for info only)__ _ _ Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 ANNUAL Iodine/Part (mrem) 2.53E-04 3.17E-04 4.49E-04 2.76E-04 1.30E-03 Applicable Limit (mrem) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 15 Percent of Limit 3.37E-03 4.23E-03 5.99E-03 3.68E-03 8.63E-03 Age Group Child Child Child Child Child Critical Organ Liver Liver Liver Liver Liver i ........... ..... ......... .. .. .... ..... .. ....... ....... ........ .... ... ..... .. .......... "....... ....... ..... .... ..... ........ ... ... .... ...: .D. AIRBORNE IODINE, PARTICULATE, TRITIUM, and CARBON-14 DOSES I Child TB Dose (mrem) 1.69E-02 1.69E-02 1.71E-02 1.69E-02 6.78E-02 Applicable Limit (mrem) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 15 Percent of Limit 2.25E-01 2.26E-01 2.28E-01 2.25E-01 4.52E-01 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 ANNUAL Child Bone Dose (mrem) 8.33E-02 8.33E-02 8.33E-02 8.33E-02 3.33E-01 Applicable Limit (mrem) 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 15..Percent of Limit (%) 1.11E+00 1.11E+00 1.11E+00 1.11E+00 2.22E+001 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 41 of 70 Indian Point Energy Center (Units 1, 2, and 3)RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT REPORT F. METEOROLOGICAL DATA Jan 1, 2014 -Dec 31, 2014 This data is stored onsite and is available in printed or electronic form.
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 42 of 70 Indian Point Energy Center (Units 1, 2, and 3)RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT G. OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL, REMP SAMPLING LOCATIONS, PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM, OR LAND USE CENSUS LOCATION CHANGES 2014 There were no changes to the REMP Sampling Locations in 2014.There were no changes in the Land Use Census in 2014.The Process Control Program (PCP) was updated in 2014 An editorial change was made to this procedure.
See the attached document for a complete copy of this fleet procedure.
There were no changes to the IPEC ODCM in 2014 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 43 of 70 Indian Point Energy Center (Units 1, 2, and 3)RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT REPORT H. GROUNDWATER and STORM WATER REPORT ACTIVITY ON SITE and OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION FOR THE PERIOD: Jan 1, 2014 -Dec 31, 2014 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 44 of 70 Summary of IPEC Groundwater and Storm Water Activity, 2014 The precipitation mass balance model applied in previous years was applied for offsite dose calculations in 2014, with some minor calibration updates performed by the contractor with regard to the distribution of groundwater flow through the site. Groundwater elevation readings continued to validate the model throughout the year.As defined in the ODCM, a conservative method of source term selection is used for determining offsite dose from Groundwater and Storm Water. If a result is below MDC (whether positive or negative) it is not included in the computed average. This computed average is therefore biased high (more conservative from a dose computation perspective) relative to an average computed using all of the data (many of which indicate no activity).
In cases where all the sampling locations assigned to a given stream tube provided results below the MDC, then an average activity value of zero was assigned to the effected portion of the stream tube. (This mathematically allows the calculation to proceed in the absence of positive detections).
Historical average precipitation at IPEC has been approximately 3 feet per year. In 2011, precipitation was unusually high (over 6 feet). In 2014, precipitation was measured at 2.62 feet per year (or inches per month, as an average).
Doses from Groundwater/Storm water are dependent on two factors: source term and precipitation during the effected year.Results of 2014 Groundwater and Storm water offsite dose evaluation The results of the assessment are shown on the following table. These dose values are a small portion of the annual limits (<0.1%), and were added to the Total Dose table in the opening summary of the Dose to Man section of this report (Section E).Groundwater (GW) and storm water tritium released from IPEC in 2014 totaled approximately 0.13 curies, resulting in a total body dose of significantly less than 0.1 mrem (1.9E-7 mrem). It is evident that tritium alone, whether from ground water or routine effluents, does not arithmetically contribute to integrated offsite dose.Sampling near the effluent points identified only trace levels of Cesium-137, Tritium and Strontium-90.
These data, as part of the Monitored Natural Attenuation analyses, show a continuation of the decreasing trends established with the termination of the identified Unit 2 SFP leaks (tritium plume) and the defueling and draining of Unit 1 SFPs (strontium plume).Strontium-90, a legacy isotope from Unit 1, contributed approximately 0.000011 curies to site effluent from the groundwater pathway. Combined GW releases from IPEC in 2014 (all radionuclides) resulted in a calculated annual dose of less than 0.00077% of the annual limits for whole body and critical organ: IPEC Groundwater and Storm Water Effluent Dose, 2014 0.0000191 mrem to the total body (0.00064%
limit)0.0000770 mrem to the critical organ, adult bone (0.00077%
limit)The annual dose from combined groundwater and storm water pathways remains well below applicable limits. When combined with routine liquid effluents (Section E), the total dose also remains significantly below ALARA limits of 3 mrem total body, and 10 mrem to the critical organ.
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 45 of 70 IPEC Summary for Storm & Ground Water releases (H-3, Co-60, Ni-63, Sr-90, and Cs.137)Mdnrtharn Prla2n 7nn.mrm,, ISOTOPES+, i BONE LIVER TOT BODY THYROID :- KIDNEY. ., LUNG.? .. :GI-LLI H-3 0 0OE+00 3.44E-09 3.44E-09 3.44E-09 3 44E-09 .3.44E-09 3 44E-09 Co-60 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.004E00 0.008=+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+O0 0.002E+0 Ni-63 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 O.0E0+0 0,00E+00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 Sr-90 0.00E+00 0.0OE+00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Cs.137 0.00E400 0.00.+00 0.00200+00 000+OO 0.02+00 0.002E+00 0.E+00 totals 0.00E-00 73.44E209 3.44E-09 3.44E-09 3.44E209 3.44E-09 3.44E-09 Unit 2 North ISOTOPE .BONE .. LIVER :TOT BODY THYROID: KIDNEY , LUNG. GI-LLI H 3 0.00E+00 1.47E208 1.47E-08 1.47E-08 1.47E-08 1.47E-08 1.47E-08 Co-60 0.00E+00 0.002E-00 0.00E+O0 0.002E00 0.002+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Ni-63 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.002+00 .0.00E+00 0 00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Sr-90 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 O.00E+O0 0a00E+CO 0.00E+00 Cs-137 0,002+00 .., 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Q00E+00 O.00E+O0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 totals 0.00E+00 1.47E-08 1.47E-08 1,472-08 1.47E-08 1.47E-08 1.472-08 Unit 12 ISOTOPE.ý
..BONE: .LIVER TOT BODY THYROID KIDNEY,....
LUNG GI-LLI'H-3 0,00E+00 4.70E-08 4.70E-08 4,70E-08 4.70E-08 4.70E-08 4.70E-08 Co-60 000+E00 .000E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Ni-63 0.00-+00 0.002+00 0.00+0 0 0.00E+0O 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E.*00 Sr-g0 7.702-05 0.002E00 1.89E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.22E-06 Cs-1 37 .00E+00 0.000+00 0.002+00 0.OOE+O0 000E+O0 0.002+E00 0.0E+0 totals 7.70E-05 4.702-08 1.892-05 4.70E-08 4.702-08 4.70E-08 2.27E-06 Unit 3 North ISOTOPE .. BONE%, LIVER TOT BODY- THYROID' KIDNEY,..
LUNG:- _______H-3 0.00E+00 6.71E-08 6.71E-08 6.712-08 6,71E-08 6. 71E-08 6.71E-08 ..Co-60 0.00E+00 0.0OE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 O.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Ni-63 0.00+E00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+O0 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.009+00 Sr-90 0,00E+00 0..00 E+00 0.002+00 0.002+0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Cs-137 0.002E000 0.002+00 0.002+00 0.00+E00 0.OOE+OO 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 totals 0.00E+00 6.71E-08 6.712-08 6,71E-08 6.71E-08 6.71E-08 6.712-08 Unit 3 South __to____t____.ISOTOPE BONE LIVER TOT BODY THYROID KIDNEY [ LUNG .GI-LLI H-3 0.00E+00 5.332.08 5.33E-08 5.33E-08 5.33E-08 5.33E-08 5.33E-08 Co-60 0. OE+00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 0.002E00 ,00+O0 0 .00E+00. 0.00E+00 Ni-63 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0,00E+00 O.00E+00 Sr-90 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.008E+0 0 00E+00 0.00E+00 0. 02+00 0.00E+00 Cs-137 0.0OE200 0.002E00 O,00.E00 .0.00.-00 0.00E+00 0,00E+00 0.00E+00 totals 0.00E+00 5.33E-08 5.33E-08 5,33E-08 5.33E-08 5.33E-08 5.332.08 Southern Clean Zone ISOTOPE :, BONE; I ".LIVER' TOT BODY .THYROID KIDNEY LUNG..:. GI-LLI.H-3 0.00E+00 3.14E-09 3.14E-09 3.14E-09 3,142.09 3.14E-09 3.14E-09 C0o60 O .OOE+00 0.0E0+00 0002+00 0.002+00 O0.0E+00 0.0E+00 Ol0.EI00 Ni-63 O.OOE+O0 0.00+O 0. O.OOE+0O 0002+00 0.0+00 0.00+00 0.OOE+00 I Sr.90 [ 0.001200 0.000+00 0.00.EO , 0.00E&00 0.002+00 0.002+00 0.002+0 Cs-1 37 0.00E+00 j o.OOE+OO O.0OE+00 0.00E+00 0,002E+0 0.00+E00 0.00E+00 I totals 0.00+E00 3.142-09 3.14E-09 3.14E-09 3.14E-09 3.142-09 3.142-09 Totals: Adult Doses, in inrern H-3 only 10 002+00 I1.89E-07 I 1.89E-07 I1.89E-07 I1.89E-07 I1.892-07 I1 89E-07.., BONE.. LIVER .. TOT BODy Y THYROID. KIDNEY :. LUNG GI-LLr all isotopes 7.702-06 1.89E-07 1.916.06 1.89E-07 1.89E-07 1.89E-07 I 2.41E-06%nAdult Doses0 I AnisjaUml 0.0007 I 0.000 I 0OO8 I 0O0O00 0.00 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 2014 yea 3.08E+ 02 7 500&04 m.OE+0 0,E0020 0002E+00 0002E+00 70004+00 7.78EE 03.0002+00 7,79E+03[3.f00E 00 O.E00C Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, & 50-286 Page 46 of 70 INDIAN POINT RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM 2014 Summary of Results The following pages represent the isotopic radio-analytical data for all onsite groundwater testing performed at Indian Point in 2014, as required per the ODCM and NEI 07-07.
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 47 of 70." " ..:' Analysis Res6lts* : Well I DaeH3 .(pCi/) Sr-. Cs-"37 (1CiIL) ::].I Co-60. (pOlL) NI-63 ""P " : :Ret I 3,a0 : :Result J 3 c Result 3 Results 3a Result [ 30]B-6 2/4/14 -1.08E+02 3.42E+02 -1.1 1.6 3.9 7.8 2.0 5.9 B-6 5/5/14 1.31E+02 3.72E+02 0.3 1.6 -3.3 10.9 0.5 9.5 B-6 7/14/14 -8.81E+01 3.45E+02 -0.1 1.5 3.2 7.2 1.5 7.1 B-6 10/8/14 -5.87E+01 3.99E+02 1.5 1.7 -3.0 6.8 1.8 6.0 1-2 1/29/14 3.48E+02 3.45E+02 1.1 1.8 0.8 13.1 0.7 6.9 1-2 4/23/14 -7.81E+01 3.51E+02 -0.1 1.4 2.6 9.6 5.3 7.1 1-2 7/29/14 1.87E+02 3.72E+02 1.4 1.6 -2.5 6.2 -2.8 5.6 1-2 10/13/14 -1.13E+02 3.84E+02 0.0 1.4 1.1 5.6 0.0 5.5 LAF-002 6/6/14 4.52E+01 3.60E+02 -1.0 1.4 0.2 5.6 -4.8 6.8 -11.9 17.3 LAF-002 11/14/14 1.06E+02 4.02E+02 0.3 1.0 -3.5 8.1 1.8 8.4 3.2 17.2 MH-5 1/17/14 5.62E+03 7.86E+02 0.8 1.7 -1.4 8.7 2.5 6.9 MH-5 4/10/14 5.31E+03 7.47E+02 1.3 1.8 2.0 8.1 -4.7 8.6 MH-5 7/15/14 5.26E+03 7.89E+02 -0.8 1.3 0.1 8.0 2.0 6.6 MH-5 10/14/14 1.79E+03 5.64E+02 0.9 1.4 2.8 8.0 2.5 4.2 MW-107 5/23/14 1.34E+02 3.66E+02 -0.5 1.6 -1.1 6.2 4.1 7.7 MW-111 5/12/14 2.38E+03 5.70E+02 0.6 1.5 3.5 8.6 -0.6 8.3 MW-111 6/23/14 5.80E+03 MW-111 7/15/14 6.87E+03 8.85E+02 1.0 1.7 2.5 8.4 9.8 9.2 MW-11i 8/25/14 1.29E+04 MW-111 9/17/14 1.44E+04 MW-111 10/15/14 1.54E+04 1.23E+03 0.2 1.0 0.2 7.2 2.9 7.8 MW-111 11/11/14 8.60E+03 MW-111 12/12/14 2.60E+03 I MW-30-69 1/23/14 5.04E+04 2.06E+03 0.6 1.1 0.8 10.4 4.6 10.1 MW-30-69 4/5/14 9.76E+04 3.24E+03 -0.5 0.6 -1.7 9.2 2.6 9.0 MW-30-69 4/14/14 1.19E+05 3.57E+03 0.1 0.6 4.4 10.9 2.9 6.7 MW-30-69 4/22/14 1.13E+05 3.48E+03 0.7 0.7 -6.3 11.9 2.7 9.4 MW-30-69 4/29/14 1.15E+05 MW-30-69 5/6/14 1.03E+05 MW-30-69 6/2/14 1.51E+05 MW-30-69 6/10/14 1.86E+05 3.66E+03 1.3 1.4 -1.9 9.1 -0.4 8.0 MW-30-69 6/18/14 l.78E+05 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 48 of 70__ Analysis Results*Well ID Date H3 (pCi/L) ISr-90 (pCi/L) 6Cs-137 (pCi/L) .Co-60 (pCi/L) Ni-63 (pCi/L)Result 3 Result 3a Result*I 3a0., Result 130 Result I3a MW-30-69 6/24/14 1.69E+05 4.59E+03 1.7 1.8 -0.5 7.8 -0.1 7.8 MW-30-69 7/3/14 2.94E+05 5.28E+03 0.2 1.5 -2.2 8.3 -3.8 7.0 MW-30-69 7/9/14 1.53E+05 MW-30-69 7/17/14 1.51E+05 MW-30-69 7/22/14 1.55E+05 MW-30-69 7/31/14 2.78E+05 4.74E+03 -0.5 8.3 -5.3 7.7 MW-30-69 8/5/14 4.16E+O5 MW-30-69 8/13/14 5.52E+O5 MW-30-69 8/18/14 4.30E+05 1.30E+04 -0.1 1.5 2.5 7.8 -0.8 9.4 MW-30-69 8/29/14 5.56E+05 MW-30-69 9/5/14 5.12E+05 MW-30-69 9/10/14 5.66E+05 MW-30-69 9/15/14 5.55E+05 MW-30-69 9/24/14 4.49E+05 MW-30-69 10/1/14 3.98E+05 MW-30-69 10/10/14 3.08E+05 9.12E+03 0.0 0.7 -4.1 8.3 2.6 9.9 MW-30-69 10/15/14 4.45E+05 MW-30-69 10/22/14 3.05E+05 MW-30-69 10/27/14 3.11E+05 MW-30-69 11/5/14 5.25E+05 MW-30-69 11/10/14 5.53E+05 MW-30-69 11/21/14 5.03E+05 MW-30-69 11/24/14 4.93E+05 MW-30-69 12/5/14 3.18E+05 MW-30-69 12/9/14 2.49E+05 MW-30-69 12/17/14 2.22E+05 MW-30-69 12/22/14 2.98E+05 MW-30-69 12/30/14 3.52E+05 MW-30-84 1/23/14 4.69E+03 7.26E+02 0.0 0.7 4.3 9.6 3.9 9.6 MW-30-84 4/5/14 4.59E+03 8.07E+02 0.8 1.5 -2.8 9.7 -2.9 7.1 MW-30-84 4/14/14 5.94E+03 8.55E+02 -0.2 0.7 -2.5 7.0 0.3 7.6 MW-30-84 4/22/14 9.50E+03 1.19E+03 -0.2 0.7 3.7 9.1 5.4 9.6 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 49 of 70.. I. ..Analysis Results*Well ID Date H3 (pCI/L) Sr-90 (pCi/L) Cs-137 (pCi/L) Co-60 (pCI/L) -Ni-63 (pCI/L)"______ _____ Result. 3 " Result J 3a Result ." 3 I Result 1 3a' Result 3a MW-30-84 4/29/14 8.80E+03 MW-30-84 5/6/14 9.OOE+03 MW-30-84 6/2/14 1.14E+04 MW-30-84 6/10/14 1.57E+04 1.14E+03 -0.7 1.6 0.0 7.8 3.1 9.2 MW-30-84 6/18/14 1.13E+04 MW-30-84 6/24/14 1.12E+04 9.42E+02 0.0 1.5 -3.0 9.4 -2.9 6.6 MW-30-84 7/3/14 2.49E+04 1.57E+03 -0.2 1.5 0.4 5.9 -3.3 5.9 MW-30-84 7/9/14 1.26E+04 MW-30-84 7/17/14 1.63E+04 MW-30-84 7/22/14 1.54E+04 MW-30-84 7/31/14 1.47E+04 1.19E+03 1.8 8.7 -4.3 10.3 MW-30-84 8/5/14 1.56E+04 MW-30-84 8/13/14 1.58E+04 MW-30-84 8/18/14 1.47E+04 1.16E+03 -0.3 1.2 -2.1 6.2 -0.2 7.1 MW-30-84 10/10/14 1.99E+04 1.95E+03 -0.3 1.1 2.4 5.5 3.4 6.1 MW-31-49 1/13/14 2.94E+02 4.11E+02 0.8 0.8 0.0 6.9 1.4 7.2 MW-31-49 2/20/14 <MDC**MW-31-49 3/27/14 2.15E+04 1.32E+03 1.5 0.7 -3.2 8.1 1.7 7.4 MW-31-49 4/9/14 2.37E+03 6.09E+02 0.5 1.3 2.6 6.5 -0.4 6.0 MW-31-49 4/19/14 2.22E+03 5.49E+02 -0.2 0.7 -0.2 8.9 3.2 8.5 MW-31-49 4/28/14 9.75E+03 MW-31-49 5/5/14 <MDC MW-31-49 6/3/14 1.21E+05 3.15E+03 -0.8 1.0 -2.7 9.4 -2.1 6.5 MW-31-49 6/12/14 3.03E+04 MW-31-49 6/20/14 6.50E+03 MW-31-49 6/27/14 6.86E+04 2.54E+03 0.7 1.7 1.8 6.4 4.1 6.5 MW-31-49 7/2/14 5.73E+04 2.36E+03 -0.5 1.4 3.9 8.3 0.5 6.5 MW-31-49 7/11/14 3.10E+03 MW-31-49 7/18/14 1.20E+03 MW-31-49 7/23/14 <MDC MW-31-49 7/30/14 8.88E+04 2.79E+03 2.2 7.7 -1.1 7.3 MW-31-49 8/6/14 1.07E+05 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 50 of 70." ... .. ...... ..... ..". .:A nalysis Results* ..... * .... ."..Well lDb Date, Sr-90 (pCi/HL) (Cs-137 6C-60 (pCi/L) Ni-63 (pCiIL)I _____ _ I __..... Result I o I Result I 3o I Result 3o I Result 3a Result] 3G MW-31-49 8/12/14 1.04E+05 MW-31-49 8/18/14 2.23E+05 6.60E+03 0.5 1.6 3.8 5.6 2.8 7.0 MW-31-49 8/29/14 1.74E+05 MW-31-49 9/3/14 1.86E+05 MW-31-49 9/8/14 1.96E+05 MW-31-49 9/15/14 1.72E+05 MW-31-49 9/24/14 1.96E+05 MW-31-49 10/1/14 1.14E+05 MW-31-49 10/7/14 1.50E+05 3.63E+03 0.3 1.5 -0.5 6.9 -1.0 6.6 MW-31-49 10/13/14 2.05E+05 MW-31-49 10/20/14 1.90E+04 MW-31-49 10/27/14 1.43E+05 MW-31-49 11/7/14 2.35E+05 MW-31-49 11/11/14 1.75E+O5 MW-31-49 11/18/14 6.08E+04 MW-31-49 11/24/14 2.54E+04 MW-31-49 12/1/14 3.20E+03 MW-31-49 12/11/14 2.80E+03 MW-31-49 12/17/14 1.20E+03 MW-31-49 12/22/14 6.03E+04 MW-31-49 12/30/14 4.11E+04 MW-31-63 1/13/14 2.79E+04 1.58E+03 -0.3 0.6 -0.6 7.8 3.6 8.1 MW-31-63 2/20/14 1.81E+04 MW-31-63 3/27/14 2.33E+05 4.32E+03 0.7 0.7 -2.9 10.4 1.5 12.0 MW-31-63 4/9/14 1.68E+05 4.20E+03 -0.3 1.1 2.1 4.0 2.3 4.3 MW-31-63 4/19/14 1.22E+05 3.63E+03 -0.5 1.4 0.9 6.8 1.3 4.7 MW-31-63 4/28/14 1.01E+05 MW-31-63 5/5/14 8.83E+04 MW-31-63 6/3/14 6.13E+04 2.26E+03 0.4 1.4 2.6 10.2 0.9 6.6 MW-31-63 6/12/14 5.51E+04 MW-31-63 6/20/14 8.94E+04 MW-31-63 6/27/14 6.40E+04 2.12E+03 -0.7 1.3 0.9 9.8 3.3 7.7 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 51 of 70* 2i .. : Analysis Results* ._. __:_ _-... ..,.Well ID Date H3 (pCI/L) Sr-90 (p0l/I)FCs73 (pCi/I) Co-60 (pCi/L) N1463 (pCI/I)IeO llH CI, II -U_1 I Result 3o. Result 3,u Result .3a Result 3 a .Result 3a MW-31-63 7/2/14 6.79E+04 2.16E+03 0.8 1.5 -1.8 7.1 0.3 6.6 MW-31-63 7/11/14 8.27E+04 MW-31-63 7/18/14 7.67E+04 MW-31-63 7/23/14 6.74E+04 MW-31-63 7/30/14 6.43E+04 2.33E+03 -2.5 6.4 -2.4 6.8 MW-31-63 8/6/14 7.39E+04 MW-31-63 8/12/14 6."4E+04 MW-31-63 8/18/14 1.37E+O5 4.02E+03 1.0 1.3 2.8 7.7 -0.2 6.7 MW-31-63 8/29/14 1.19E+05 MW-31-63 9/3/14 1.45E+05 MW-31-63 9/8/14 1.20E+05 MW-31-63 9/15/14 9.15E+04 MW-31-63 9/24/14 1.68E+05 MW-31-63 10/1/14 1.11E+05 MW-31-63 10/7/14 1.50E+05 3.72E+03 0.4 1.4 1.7 5.7 -0.2 5.9 MW-31-63 10/13/14 1.97E+05 MW-31-63 10/20/14 3.04E+05 MW-31-63 10/27/14 3.01E+05 MW-31-63 11/7/14 2.55E+05 MW-31-63 11/11/14 2.37E+05 MW-31-63 11/18/14 2.63E+05 MW-31-63 11/24/14 1.85E+05 MW-31-63 12/1/14 1.70E+05 MW-31-63 12/11/14 2.85E+05 MW-31-63 12/17/14 1.89E+05 MW-31-63 12/22/14 1.85E+05 MW-31-63 12/30/14 1.41E+05 MW-31-85 1/13/14 1.19E+03 4.89E+02 -0.7 0.7 -1.0 8.3 -1.4 7.7 MW-31-85 2/20/14 6.60E+03 MW-31-85 3/27/14 5.18E+04 2.10E+03 0.5 0.5 -1.0 8.4 -3.0 10.1 MW-31-85 4/9/14 9.42E+03 1.07E+03 -0.3 0.5 7.3 10.1 -3.3 10.8 MW-31-85 4/19/14 1.04E+04 1.12E+03 1.8 1.8 1.8 10.5 -1.1 7.4-Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 52 of 70 Analysis Results* _ _ __: _ _*Well ID Date H3 (pCi/L) Sr-90 (pCi/L) " Cs-137 (pCI/L) Co-60 (pCi/L) Ni-63 (pCi/L)Result 3 esult 30 Result,.:..
30 Result:"j, 30 Result.l 3 MW-31-85 4/28/14 2.39E+04 MW-31-85 5/5/14 5.10E+03 MW-31-85 6/3/14 4.10E+04 1.82E+03 0.3 0.9 -1.7 5.6 3.2 5.5 MW-31-85 6/12/14 2.67E+04 MW-31-85 6/20/14 1.65E+04 MW-31-85 6/27/14 2.96E+04 1.45E+03 -0.5 1.5 -4.2 7.6 1.2 8.3 MW-31-85 7/2/14 5.38E+04 1.96E+03 -0.4 1.4 2.0 6.3 1.2 8.0 MW-31-85 7/11/14 8.90E+03 MW-31-85 7/18/14 1.29E+04 MW-31-85 7/23/14 4.60E+03 MW-31-85 7/30/14 5.27E+04 2.14E+03 2.6 9.0 1.0 8.0 MW-31-85 8/6/14 6.93E+04 MW-31-85 8/12/14 4.65E+04 MW-31-85 8/18/14 4.38E+04 0.4 1.6 0.8 6.5 -1.1 5.7 MW-31-85 10/7/14 4.56E+04 2.12E+03 0.8 1.5 0.7 7.7 3.6 6.2 MW-32-149 1/13/14 1.40E+02 3.84E+02 -0.5 0.6 -0.1 7.4 2.6 9.8 MW-32-149 2/20/14 <MDC MW-32-149 3/28/14 1.56E+02 3.93E+02 -0.7 1.3 -5.7 9.1 -0.4 8.7 MW-32-149 4/8/14 2.28E+02 3.87E+02 0.3 1.6 -0.8 9.0 4.6 9.8 MW-32-149 4/15/14 3.32E+02 1.OOE+02 1.5 1.9 -5.8 10.4 0.8 7.6 MW-32-149 4/23/14 -3.52E+01 3.45E+02 -0.9 1.0 -4.0 10.4 -1.8 8.0 MW-32-149 5/2/14 <MDC MW-32-149 5/12/14 <MDC MW-32-149 6/3/14 9.28E+01 4.17E+02 1.8 1.9 -0.5 7.3 4.3 5.2 MW-32-149 6/11/14 <MDC MW-32-149 6/20/14 <MDC MW-32-149 6/26/14 3.69E+01 3.42E+02 0.0 1.0 -0.3 6.9 -0.5 7.4 MW-32-149 7/2/14 1.80E+02 3.54E+02 0.8 1.7 -1.1 7.3 6.5 10.6 MW-32-149 7/11/14 <MDC MW-32-149 7/18/14 <MDC MW-32-149 7/23/14 <MDC MW-32-149 7/30/14 -1.S0E+02 3.99E+02 I -1.2 10.3 -5.6 10.1 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 53 of 70."Analysis Results*Well 10 [ Result 3 (pCI/I). Sr-90 (pOI/L)ILi Cs-137 (pC/I) C~omO (pCiII) IF Ni-63 (pCI/I).Result I 3o Result 3___ Result R itIResult lRsl MW-32-149 8/6/14 <MDC MW-32-149 8/12/14 <MDC MW-32-149 8/17/14 2.88E+02 4.26E+02 1.5 1.7 -3.4 6.7 1.2 6.3 MW-32-149 10/7/14 1.27E+02 3.90E+02 1.3 1.5 3.7 7.9 0.1 S.6 MW-32-173 1/13/14 1.31E+02 3.81E+02 1.3 1.7 0.0 14.1 -1.2 7.8 MW-32-173 2/20/14 <MDC I I I MW-32-173 3/28/14 1.47E+02 3.90E+02 -0.7 1.4 0.5 7.2 4.4 6.9 MW-32-173 4/15/14 3.21E+02 3.84E+02 0.4 1.5 3.5 10.2 5.4 8.3 MW-32-173 4/23/14 2.15E+02 3.69E+02 -0.3 1.4 8.6 12.1 3.7 10.3 MW-32-173 6/11/14 3.36E+03 MW-32-173 8/17/14 1.97E+02 3.99E+02 -0.8 1.5 -1.2 8.8- -1.3 10.8 1 MW-32-173 10/7/14 -3.39E+01 3.72E+02 1.6 1.6 0.7 6.2 1.0 5.8 MW-32-190 1/13/14 8.73E+02 4.59E+02 0.6 1.6 0.9 6.6 -1.1 8.1 MW-32-190 2/20/14 4.68E+02 MW-32-190 3/28/14 8.15E+02 4.56E+02 -0.8 1.3 1.3 7.9 5.8 9.2 MW-32-190 4/15/14 7.26E+02 4.35E+02 0.8 1.6 5.6 13.5 2.7 7.4 MW-32-190 4/23/14 7.21E+02 4.38E+02 0.0 1.5 -3.9 12.3 -1.9 7.7 MW-32-190 6/11/14 <MDC MW-32-190 8/17/14 5.56E+02 4.41E+02 -1.1 1.4 0.0 13.0 -0.6 5.9 MW-32-190 10/7/14 6.11E+02 4.41E+02 1.4 1.7 4.5 6.5 -0.8 5.7 MW-32-59 1/13/14 2.25E+03 5.76E+02 1.4 1.8 -0.3 8.8 -1.6 6.8 MW-32-59 2/20/14 2.31E+04 MW-32-59 3/28/14 6.72E+05 7.35E+03 1.8 0.7 3.0 8.0 -2.4 7.4 MW-32-59 4/8/14 2.17E+05 4.77E+03 -1.0 1.2 -1.7 8.9 2.3 9.6 MW-32-59 4/15/14 4.33E+05 6.69E+03 -0.1 1.4 3.3 9.2 4.5 8.5 MW-32-59 4/23/14 2.15E+05 4.77E+03 1.3 1.6 -3.7 10.3 -0.6 9.8 MW-32-59 5/2/14 5.55E+04 MW-32-59 5/12/14 1.35E+04 MW-32-59 6/3/14 4.68E+05 6.03E+03 -0.3 0.7 0.7 7.2 -0.6 5.5 MW-32-59 6/10/14 2.50E+05 MW-32-59 6/11/14 2.56E+05 MW-32-59 6/20/14 2.OOE+05 t U Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 54 of 70 I P_____________________ " Analysis Results*Well ID Date H3 (p(pC/I) Cs-137 (pCI/) Co-60 (pCi/L) Ni-63 (pCi/L)Da Resut Result I 3o Resut 3a Result 3.' Result J 30 MW-32-59 6/26/14 4.24E+05 1.19E+04 0.8 1.7 -0.3 6.0 -0.9 6.2 MW-32-59 7/2/14 3.47E+05 9.72E+03 0.3 1.7 -0.5 6.2 3.0 7.1 MW-32-59 7/11/14 9.06E+04 MW-32-59 7/18/14 1.89E+04 MW-32-59 7/23/14 5.56E+04 MW-32-59 7/30/14 4.16E+05 5.97E+03 -1.2 7.7 -4.9 8.9 MW-32-59 8/6/14 4.54E+05 MW-32-59 8/12/14 4.23E+05 MW-32-59 8/17/14 4.67E+05 1.38E+04 -0.4 1.5 -0.8 6.8 2.1 7.5 MW-32-59 8/29/14 5.02E+05 MW-32-59 9/3/14 5.14E+05 MW-32-59 9/8/14 5.20E+05 MW-32-59 9/15/14 5.96E+05 MW-32-59 9/24/14 5.88E+05 MW-32-59 10/2/14 3.72E+O5 MW-32-59 10/7/14 5.49E+05 8.07E+03 0.7 1.4 -3.9 8.1 2.3 7.2 MW-32-59 10/13/14 5.88E+05 MW-32-59 10/20/14 1.98E+05 MW-32-59 10/27/14 3.08E+05 MW-32-59 11/7/14 6.02E+05 MW-32-59 11/11/14 6.03E+05 MW-32-59 11/18/14 5.72E+05 MW-32-59 11/24/14 5.14E+05 MW-32-59 12/1/14 6.46E+04 MW-32-59 12/11/14 2.72E+04 MW-32-59 12/17/14 2.75E+04 MW-32-59 12/22/14 2.53E+05 MW-32-59 12/30/14 2.37E+05 MW-32-85 1/13/14 8.49E+03 9.21E+02 0.2 0.8 -3.6 8.2 -1.1 7.9 MW-32-85 2/20/14 7.90E+03 MW-32-85 3/28/14 9.33E+03 8.76E+02 -1.1 0.7 5.4 8.2 -3.9 8.4 1W-32-85 4/8/14 9.49E+03 1.07E+03 0.4 1.5 1.8 9.6 3.7 8.9 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 55 of 70 Analysis Results* "_- __-"._..iWell ID Date H3 (pCi/L) Sr-90 (pCi/L) J Cs-137 (pCi/L) Co-60 (pCi/L) NI-63 (pCi/L)Result I 3 Result 1 3a Result I 3o ResultJ 3'a Result I 3 MW-32-85 4/15/14 1.OSE+04 1.1OE+03 0.2 1.3 -0.8 8.0 -4.4 8.6 MW-32-85 4/23/14 1.26E+04 1.25E+03 0.0 1.3 -0.1 11.0 -4.4 7.0 MW-32-85 5/2/14 1.67E+04 MW-32-85 5/12/14 1.84E+04 MW-32-85 6/3/14 2.04E+04 1.32E+03 -1.3 1.6 1.4 6.7 4.5 5.3 MW-32-85 6/10/14 2.02E+04 MW-32-85 6/11/14 1.87E+04 MW-32-85 6/20/14 2.05E+04 MW-32-85 6/26/14 1.72E+04 1.13E+03 -0.3 1.4 -1.0 6.8 0.6 6.9 MW-32-85 7/2/14 1.73E+04 1.14E+03 -0.2 1.6 -0.9 8.9 -1.0 9.5 MW-32-85 7/11/14 1.77E+04 MW-32-85 7/18/14 1.81E+04 MW-32-85 7/23/14 1.64E+04 MW-32-85 7/30/14 1.74E+04 1.26E+03 -0.7 10.2 4.3 8.7 MW-32-85 8/6/14 1.77E+04 MW-32-85 8/12/14 1.78E+04 MW-32-85 8/17/14 1.76E+04 1.23E+03 0.2 1.3 -2.0 5.9 -1.8 6.0 MW-32-85 10/7/14 1.96E+04 1.41E+03 -1.0 1.3 1.3 5.6 -2.6 7.2 MW-33 5/12/14 5.42E+03 7.68E+02 1.2 1.8 4.5 8.8 0.6 9.5 MW-33 6/18/14 1.54E+04 MW-33 7/16/14 1.12E+04 MW-33 8/25/14 4.31E+03 MW-33 9/17/14 7.50E+03 MW-33 10/15/14 9.83E+03 9.96E+02 -0.9 1.3 2.6 7.7 3.3 5.3 1 MW-33 11/5/14 1.10E+04 MW-33 12/12/14 2.09E+04 MW-35 5/12/14 2.96E+02 3.42E+02 -0.3 0.8 8.6 11.1 3.5 10.3 MW-35 6/18/14 1.60E+03 MW-35 7/16/14 <MDC MW-35 8/25/14 6.17E+03 MW-35 9/17/14 7.40E+03 MW-35 10/15/14 8.83E+03 9.72E+02 0.5 1.3 -2.5 7.7 1.4 5.6 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 56 of 70_________
Analysis Results* -_ _Well ID Date H3 Sr-S(ppCi/L) , Cs-137 (pCi/L) Coý60 (pCi/L) NI-63 (pCi/L)Result 3 co Result l 3 ° _ Result, '°Result 3a I Result 3a MW-35 11/5/14 1.20E+03 MW-35 12/12/14 <MDC MW-36-24 1/28/14 4.18E+02 4.11E+02 1.5 1.8 3.7 4.8 -0.6 9.9 MW-36-24 5/1/14 2.53E+03 6.21E+02 0.3 1.3 1.9 7.9 5.4 10.5 1 MW-36-24 6/19/14 3.70E+03 MW-36-24 7/21/14 2.82E+03 6.30E+02 0.0 1.6 -2.4 6.5 0.4 6.6 MW-36-24 8/22/14 4.41E+03 MW-36-24 10/16/14 2.45E+03 6.03E+02 0.9 1.5 -1.6 5.9 4.4 6.9 MW-36-41 1/28/14 4.82E+03 7.35E+02 3.3 2.2 0.1 7.7 -2.9 8.4 MW-36-41 5/1/14 6.29E+03 8.52E+02 5.6 2.2 1.2 8.0 4.6 6.5 MW-36-41 6/19/14 5.40E+03 I -_I MW-36-41 7/21/14 6.15E+03 8.37E+02 5.5 2.4 -1.8 8.6 -1.2 7.9 MW-36-41 8/22/14 7.35E+03 MW-36-41 9/16/14 9.30E+03 MW-36-41 10/16/14 1.21E+04 1.11E+03 3.0 1.7 -2.8 7.8 -3.9 7.7 MW-36-41 11/6/14 9.30E+03 MW-36-41 12/10/14 9.OOE+03 MW-36-52 1/28/14 4.23E+03 6.93E+02 4.6 2.3 -2.4 7.8 -2.3 7.0 MW-36-52 5/1/14 5.00E+03 7.86E+02 4.0 2.1 1.1 5.5 -2.0 5.8 MW-36-52 6/19/14 5.10E+03 MW-36-52 7/21/14 4.82E+03 7.35E+02 1.9 2.0 0.0 6.1 1.2 6.3 MW-36-52 8/22/14 5.13E+03 MW-36-52 10/16/14 4.81E+03 7.71E+02 2.4 1.4 -6.0 6.6 1.9 6.0 MW-37-22 1/24/14 1.65E+03 5.28E+02 7.0 2.8 -1.3 6.4 0.4 7.3 MW-37-22 5/1/14 3.60E+03 6.36E+02 6.6 2.4 -1.7 6.3 1.1 8.2 MW-37-22 6/19/14 3.90E+03 MW-37-22 7/25/14 3.14E+03 6.42E+02 6.2 2.6 2.1 7.2 2.4 7.4 MW-37-22 8/22/14 3.84E+03 MW-37-22 10/16/14 3.59E+03 6.75E+02 8.2 2.2 2.8 5.3 0.5 6.1 MW-37-32 1/24/14 2.82E+03 6.06E+02 10.3 3.2 -1.3 8.2 3.2 8.6 MW-37-32 5/1/14 3.68E+03 6.72E+02 14.8 3.5 1.6 9.9 5.5 9.4 MW-37-32 6/19/14 4.30E+03 1_ ___
Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 57 of 70[......___
_____ ____ ____ _____ ____ Analysis Results* " _"__ __ _"_" __" _*_......Well ID Date H3 (PCI/L) Sr-90(pCi/L), Cs-137 (pCI/L) Co-60 (pCI/LI) Ni-63 (pCI/L Result 3a ] Result.. 3a Result I 30 Result J 3 Result.. 3a MW-37-32 7/25/14 3.86E+03 7.14E+02 13.2 2.6 0.7 5.6 1.0 7.0 MW-37-32 8/22/14 4.07E+03 MW-37-32 10/16/14 4.12E+03 7.38E+02 19.7 3.4 -1.7 6.2 3.0 7.1 MW-37-40 1/24/14 3.29E+03 6.36E+02 12.3 1.3 -1.1 8.0 -0.4 7.5 MW-37-40 5/1/14 2.77E+03 6.15E+02 19.1 3.4 -0.5 7.3 2.4 9.5 MW-37-40 6/19/14 4.30E+03 I MW-37-40 7/25/14 3.63E+03 6.90E+02 19.0 4.3 -0.3 8.2 -2.6 8.3 MW-37-40 8/22/14 3.95E+03 MW-37-40 10/16/14 4.19E+03 7.35E+02 16.6 2.9 0.6 6.1 -0.2 6.9 MW-37-57 1/24/14 3.23E+03 6.42E+02 15.8 1.6 7.5 13.1 1.9 7.6 MW-37-57 5/1/14 3.OOE+03 6.33E+02 20.3 2.9 -0.8 8.3 -1.8 11.2 MW-37-57 6/19/14 5.10E+03 MW-37-57 7/25/14 4.OOE+03 7.20E+02 24.5 3.5 1.4 6.2 -2.0 7.5 MW-37-57 8/22/14 4.18E+03 MW-37-57 10/16/14 4.02E+03 7.29E+02 18.8 3.2 3.4 7.4 -2.5 7.1 MW-39-102 5/13/14 3.36E+02 3.81E+02 -0.8 1.3 -1.6 7.1 -1.3 6.7 MW-39-102 10/31/14 2.14E+01 2.96E+02 0.6 0.7 0.6 6.6 0.2 6.5 MW-39-124 5/13/14 1.14E+02 4.23E+02 0.0 1.1 1.8 9.1 -1.8 9.1 MW-39-124 10/31/14 1.98E+02 3.51E+02 0.1 0.6 6.9 10.8 -3.3 11.2 MW-39-183 5/13/14 -3.64E+01 4.14E+02 0.2 1.3 1.5 7.0 1.7 7.7 MW-39-183 10/31/14 8.66E+01 3.18E+02 0.1 1.4 -0.2 7.2 0.9 6.7 MW-39-195 5/13/14 4.64E+02 4.56E+02 0.1 1.4 -1.1 6.9 1.7 7.0 MW-39-195 10/31/14 2.61E+02 3.66E+02 0.0 0.7 -4.1 9.8 -4.7 8.3 MW-39-67 5/13/14 3.87E+02 3.87E+02 1.3 1.6 3.0 9.1 1.5 9.0 MW-39-67 10/31/14 3.47E+02 3.87E+02 0.7 0.9 3.5 6.5 -2.0 6.9 MW-39-84 5/13/14 3.63E+02 4.59E+02 0.1 1.3 -2.9 7.2 -1.3 5.5 MW-39-84 10/31/14 2.21E+01 2.98E+02 0.5 0.7 0.1 6.7 -5.5 11.9 MW-40-100 2/7/14 3.58E+01 3.81E+02 -0.9 1.5 4.2 18.9 -0.9 11.0 MW-40-100 5/22/14 -3.74E+00 3.87E+02 0.3 1.6 1.7 8.7 -0.9 8.3 MW-40-100 8/15/14 3.75E+01 3.87E+02 0.4 1.5 -0.5 7.9 -0.5 7.1 MW-40-100 11/12/14 6.33E+01 3.09E+02 -0.6 0.8 -3.3 7.4 0.0 7.1 MW-40-127 2/7/14 3.35E+01 3.78E+02 -0.4 1.5 0.0 14.6 6.1 8.2 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 58 of 70 Analysis Results* _,_ : " WellD 0 Date H3 (pCi/L) Sr-90 (pCi/L) Cs-137 (pCi/L) Co-60 (pCI/L),..
N 1-63 (pCI/L)Result H 3 Result _ _3 Result J 3 o Reiult .3"b ResultJ 3o MW-40-127 5/22/14 2.23E+02 3.99E+02 0.5 1.7 2.3 8.6 -0.5 6.5 MW-40-127 8/15/14 1.96E+01 3.90E+02 -0.5 0.9 1.0 7.0 -1.0 7.6 MW-40-127 11/12/14 -2.81E+00 2.82E+02 0.0 0.5 -4.5 9.1 -1.6 8.0 MW-40-162 2/7/14 -1.12E+02 3.57E+02 -0.6 1.5 -1.4 9.6 2.6 17.3 MW-40-162 5/22/14 1.27E+02 3.81E+02 0.2 1.6 -1.8 8.4 -0.7 5.7 MW-40-162 8/15/14 -1.15E+02 3.75E+02 0.8 1.8 0.9 7.7 0.2 8.4 MW-40-162 11/12/14 1.79E+01 2.86E+02 1.1 1.1 2.7 6.6 0.4 7.2 MW-40-27 2/7/14 -4.04E+01 3.66E+02 -0.2 1.6 1.8 7.9 0.7 8.0 MW-40-27 5/22/14 2.76E+02 3.81E+02 0.7 1.7 -3.3 8.9 -0.6 7.2 MW-40-27 8/15/14 -4.32E-01 4.05E+02 1.2 1.8 2.1 5.9 0.0 8.3 MW-40-27 11/12/14 -6.53E+01 2.65E+02 0.6 0.7 -1.5 7.1 -2.5 7.1 MW-40-46 2/7/14 2.32E+01 3.78E+02 -0.3 1.6 8.0 10.1 -0.8 9.3 MW-40-46 5/22/14 3.OOE+02 3.96E+02 -0.7 1.3 -1.2 8.0 0.8 8.5 MW-40-46 8/15/14 -3.17E+01 3.87E+02 -0.3 1.5 -6.6 8.2 -1.3 6.0 MW-40-46 11/12/14 2.07E+01 2.94E+02 -0.1 0.6 1.2 5.9 -0.6 5.4 MW-40-81 2/7/14 -5.73E+01 3.72E+02 0.6 1.7 0.4 8.1 -0.1 7.1 MW-40-81 5/22/14 3.14E+02 3.87E+02 0.9 1.7 5.0 8.4 1.2 7.1 MW-40-81 8/15/14 1.57E+02 4.08E+02 0.2 1.7 -2.6 6.1 0.4 5.9 MW-40-81 11/12/14 1.65E+02 3.30E+02 -0.3 0.6 -2.7 7.2 7.0 7.8 MW-41-40 1/31/14 3.54E+03 6.60E+02 1.2 1.8 3.1 8.6 0.4 7.9 MW-41-40 5/15/14 -6.11E+00 3.48E+02 -0.1 1.3 2.6 6.8 1.6 7.3 MW-41-40 8/4/14 3.55E+03 6.87E+02 -0.6 1.4 1.2 6.0 1.8 6.2 MW-41-40 10/30/14 2.13E+02 3.96E+02 0.6 0.9 -4.4 7.0 -0.9 5.7 MW-41-63 1/31/14 6.81E+02 4.47E+02 1.6 1.0 -0.9 7.5 -0.1 9.7 MW-41-63 5/15/14 2.78E+01 3.51E+02 0.9 1.4 0.2 8.0 -0.5 7.9 MW-41-63 8/4/14 3.OSE+02 3.90E+02 2.5 2.0 -1.8 7.9 4.2 8.7 MW-41-63 10/30/14 3.07E+02 3.81E+02 1.8 1.8 1.0 6.5 -2.3 5.6 MW-42-49 1/31/14 2.34E+04 1.26E+03 24.5 1.9 56500 480 -2.0 9.3 433 34 MW-42-49 4/2/14 7.84E+02 4.08E+02 2.4 1.7 50400 453 -1.6 12.1 422 37 MW-42-49 7/14/14 5.96E+02 4.50E+02 3.8 2.2 27600 242 2.6 4.9 358 34 MW-42-49 10/28/14 6.24E+02 4.62E+02 3.9 1.4 46900 330 2.4 8.8 306 35 MW-42-78 1/31/14 3.32E+02 4.05E+02 0.4 0.7 0.8 6.8 -1.8 8.2 0.9 17.6 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 59 of 70 Analysis Results* ...._ __ ___" _ __, __ ___" Well ID Date H3 (pCi/L) Sr-90 (pCi/L) dI Cs-137 (pCi/L) ". .Co-60 (pCi/L) Ni-63 (pCi/L)Result I 3 Result I30 Result I 3a.. Result:,I.
3a Result J 3 MW-42-78 4/2/14 6.29E+02 3.90E+02 1.1 1.6 -0.5 7.6 4.4 6.9 1.0 23.1 MW-42-78 7/14/14 6.74E+02 4.32E+02 0.1 1.5 -1.9 8.6 -1.7 6.9 -1.2 20.9 MW-42-78 10/28/14 3.25E+03 6.60E+02 1.1 1.6 1.5 7.7 -5.0 8.2 -12.0 19.9 MW-43-28 1/30/14 8.11E+01 3.66E+02 0.3 1.4 3.1 8.5 -3.0 7.7 MW-43-28 5/6/14 4.50E+01 4.02E+02 -0.2 1.0 -1.9 9.0 3.1 7.3 MW-43-28 8/4/14 1.14E+02 3.99E+02 0.4 1.7 -3.2 7.1 -0.5 7.0 MW-43-28 10/21/14 -4.48E+01 3.78E+02 -0.3 1.2 1.1 6.3 3.5 6.3 MW-43-62 1/30/14 1.53E+02 3.75E+02 -1.0 1.3 -2.0 10.0 6.7 8.2 MW-43-62 5/6/14 -8.05E+01 3.87E+02 1.1 1.7 0.9 9.0 3.6 8.9 MW-43-62 8/4/14 5.37E+01 3.96E+02 -0.2 1.6 1.7 7.8 1.3 8.9 MW-43-62 10/21/14 3.02E+01 3.69E+02 0.1 1.5 -1.2 8.4 1.0 6.9 MW-44-102 1/30/14 7.05E+02 4.20E+02 -0.8 1.4 -3.6 7.7 3.9 7.3 MW-44-102 5/13/14 3.10E+02 3.75E+02 -0.2 1.3 -2.7 7.4 0.4 10.6 MW-44-102 8/11/14 2.49E+02 4.26E+02 -0.1 0.8 5.3 11.3 -0.3 6.8 MW-44-102 11/4/14 3.15E+02 3.75E+02 0.4 0.6 1.6 8.1 0.8 5.7 MW-44-66 1/30/14 3.74E+02 3.81E+02 0.4 1.6 3.2. 8.5 1.2 8.2 MW-44-66 5/13/14 2.96E+02 4.26E+02 0.3 1.4 -4.7 7.8 -2.5 7.7 MW-44-66 8/11/14 3.04E+02 4.23E+02 -0.2 1.7 2.8 6.8 1.7 5.7 MW-44-66 11/4/14 4.85E+02 4.20E+02 0.2 0.7 1.1 8.5 5.0 8.8 MW-45-42 2/4/14 5.91E+02 4.41E+02 0.7 1.5 -0.1 7.9 2.6 8.3 MW-45-42 5/16/14 7.88E+02 4,98E+02 0.6 1.4 5.9 11.1 2.0 6.6 MW-45-42 8/11/14 6.03E+02 4.77E+02 0.5 1.2 -3.7 7.7 3.4 6.3 MW-45-42 11/4/14 2.03E+03 5.40E+02 0.1 0.8 2.4 9.1 3.1 6.9 MW-45-61 2/4/14 4.92E+02 4.14E+02 0.3 0.9 7.5 7.8 0.7 7.0 MW-45-61 5/15/14 5.74E+02 4.11E+02 1.2 1.8 -1.4 7.2 -2.4 7.4 MW-45-61 8/11/14 6.44E+02 4.68E+02 0.4 1.0 -0.1 6.1 2.0 6.3 MW-45-61 11/4/14 9.05E+02 4.95E+02 0.3 0.6 -0.1 6.3 1.4 6.9 MW-46 2/6/14 1.77E+03 5.19E+02 -0.3 1.6 0.3 7.8 2.7 7.1 MW-46 5/19/14 1.63E+03 5.67E+02 -0.4 1.1 1.8 6.4 0.3 8.6 MW-46 8/8/14 1.12E+03 4.74E+02 0.4 1.0 -2.0 7.2 1.3 5.6 MW-46 11/3/14 1.61E+03 5.49E+02 0.2 1.3 8.0 7.3 -1.2 7.6 MW-47-56 1/27/14 1.11E+03 4.74E+02 -0.2 1.6 2.6 10.3 0.7 9.2 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 60 of 70 S1 " _ _* _ _.__...:_:Analysis Results* ..
- _ _ _ P Well ID Date Heu 3 (pCi/L) .Sr-90 (pa/L) Cs-137 (pCl/L) : R:T t*6 (pCI/I) IF Ni-63 (pCi/L)Re. sult 3a Result 3a Relt 3a Resul 1 3a H ReIslt1 3 MW-47-56 4/3/14 1.48E+04 1.17E+03 -0.9 1.2 4.5 8.7 -1.1 7.5 MW-47-80 1/27/14 1.15E+04 1.04E+03 2.2 1.9 -6.3 10.4 -2.7 7.4 MW-47-80 4/3/14 7.37E+03 8.55E+02 0.6 1.7 -1.1 8.0 -0.4 8.4 MW-49-26 1/9/14 2.84E+03 5.58E+02 18.7 3.4 0.8 7.9 -3.6 7.2 8.0 18.8 MW-49-26 5/9/14 2.60E+03 5.94E+02 12.5 3.0 -0.8 8.8 -5.2 8.4 5.1 18.8 MW-49-26 7/15/14 2.64E+03 6.18E+02 10.4 3.1 1.8 8.6 -0.5 5.3 -4.3 20.9 MW-49-26 8/19/14 2.57E+03 MW-49-26 10/20/14 2.43E+03 6.03E+02 11.9 2.5 1.7 7.3 -3.2 7.1 -11.2 18.2 MW-49-42 1/9/14 3.65E+03 6.06E+02 13.8 3.8 6.3 11.1 3.7 8.0 -0.1 17.9 MW-49-42 5/9/14 3.69E+03 6.75E+02 14.3 3.2 -0.1 9.1 -2.7 6.7 11.5 19.5 MW-49-42 7/15/14 4.10E+03 7.05E+02 11.5 3.3 -0.9 7.6 -1.5 7.3 4.0 20.9 MW-49-42 8/19/14 3.97E+03 MW-49-42 10/20/14 3.46E+03 6.60E+02 15.9 2.9 -0.4 6.2 3.3 6.3 -12.1 18.2 MW-49-65 1/9/14 4.15E+03 6.39E+02 7.8 2.8 -1.7 8.3 3.4 9.4 15.3 17.4 MW-49-65 5/9/14 3.53E+03 6.66E+02 8.6 2.7 6.7 4.9 -1.5 10.0 6.5 22.3 MW-49-65 7/15/14 3.84E+03 6.84E+02 9.9 2.8 1.5 5.8 -2.0 5.5 -4.7 20.2 MW-49-65 8/19/14 3.86E+03 MW-49-65 10/20/14 3.92E+03 7.20E+02 11.2 2.6 0.4 6.1 -1.4 7.1 -4.7 18.4 MW-50-42 1/8/14 5.20E+02 3.99E+02 5.1 2.5 -0.4 7.3 8.3 6.6 15.0 19.0 MW-50-42 4/30/14 3.67E+03 6.45E+02 16.7 3.5 0.3 8.6 1.1 7.5 0.6 23.0 MW-50-42 7/15/14 2.11E+03 6.27E+02 7.6 2.8 -1.6 6.5 1.6 6.1 -14.2 21.5 MW-50-42 8/19/14 5.14E+03 MW-50-42 9/16/14 1.70E+03 MW-50-42 10/16/14 2.39E+03 5.58E+02 14.0 3.0 1.7 6.0 0.4 6.1 -5.6 19.0 MW-50-42 11/6/14 1.90E+03 MW-50-42 12/10/14 6.70E+03 MW-50-66 1/8/14 4.08E+03 6.39E+02 21.0 4.5 -4.5 9.5 3.1 8.2 1.9 18.1 MW-50-66 4/30/14 3.79E+03 6.84E+02 20.1 3.6 -1.5 8.8 10.4 10.7 14.1 20.4 MW-50-66 7/15/14 4.23E+03 7.11E+02 15.2 3.9 0.0 11.8 -3.6 7.1 -1.0 20.2 MW-50-66 8/19/14 4.29E+03 MW-50-66 10/16/14 5.15E+03 6.87E+02 20.7 3.1 3.2 6.0 0.4 6.8 -16.3 18.5 MW-51-104 2/10/14 2.52E+02 4.02E+02 -0.2 1.5 -1.2 7.0 3.5 9.0 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 61 of 70[________Analysis Results* _ _ _ _ ,__Result IDae HResult 1 33 Resul7 t J 3 Result 3 u FResult F. 3 a.MW-51-104 5/23/14 8.42E+01 4.29E+02 0.8 1.4 -2.1 8.9 -0.3 7.1 MW-51-104 8/14/14 -4.81E+00 3.99E+02 0.9 1.2 -2.5 7.9 -0.6 7.6 MW-51-104 11/13/14 2.87E+02 4.26E+02 0.0 1.6 0.1 8.4 0.0 7.4 MW-51-135 2/10/14 -6.62E+01 3.60E+02 -1.3 1.5 -2.3 8.9 3.5 9.0 MW-51-135 5/23/14 1.46E+02 3.75E+02 0.1 1.6 -1.6 7.3 1.4 5.2 MW-51-135 8/14/14 3.28E+02 4.35E+02 -0.2 1.2 0.1 9.0 -0.2 7.6 MW-51-135 11/13/14 2.67E+02 4.29E+02 0.6 1.1 5.6 8.6 -6.0 7.8 MW-51-163 2/10/14 -1.62E+02 3.48E+02 -0.6 1.4 -7.3 11.8 -3.3 12.0 MW-51-163 5/23/14 1.06E+02 3.84E+02 -1.6 1.6 -4.5 7.2 1.9 7.6 MW-51-163 8/14/14 -5.63E+00 3.96E+02 -0.5 1.4 3.6 7.7 -0.8 7.4 MW-51-163 11/13/14 9.27E+01 3.99E+02 0.1 0.9 3.1 8.1 2.3 7.4 MW-51-189 2/10/14 -3.70E+01 3.72E+02 0.0 1.6 1.0 9.3 -6.9 9.6 MW-51-189 5/23/14 1.75E+02 3.78E+02 -0.7 1.1 2.6 11.4 -5.2 7.7 MW°51-189 8/14/14 1.36E+02 4.08E+02 -0.5 1.4 -1.7 6.5 -0.6 6.4 MW-51-189 11/13/14 6.75E+01 4.05E+02 0.4 1.6 1.3 6.9 4.0 8.8 MW-51-40 2/10/14 2.51E+02 4.08E+02 0.3 1.6 0.1 5.9 8.1 9.4 MW-51-40 5/23/14 4.49E+01 4.11E+02 1.3 1.6 -2.2 7.0 4.4 6.5 MW-51-40 8/14/14 7.75E+01 4.14E+02 -0.9 1.0 0.3 7.4 -3.3 8.9 MW-51-40 11/13/14 3.71E+02 4.35E+02 0.2 1.4 6.8 11.1 2.0 7.5 MW-51-79 2/10/14 -9.42E+01 3.54E+02 0.4 1.6 -3.4 8.3 -0.9 8.2 MW-51-79 5/23/14 1.08E+02 4.11E+02 1.9 1.9 -2.7 6.5 1.9 5.3 MW-51-79 8/14/14 1.01E+02 4.23E+02 0.2 1.5 -5.2 7.1 1.1 6.3 MW-51-79 11/13/14 3.76E+02 4.38E+02 0.4 1.0 -4.7 9.1 0.4 10.0 MW-52-11 5/29/14 4.02E+02 3.93E+02 -0.4 1.1 -5.6 8.0 -1.6 7.5 MW-52-122 5/20/14 -1.33E+01 3.66E+02 -0.9 1.4 -0.9 8.2 1.9 7.2 MW-52-162 5/20/14 3.55E+02 4.02E+02 1.1 1.4 1.1 8.3 0.8 7.6 MW-52-18 5/20/14 9.69E+01 3.69E+02 0.7 0.9 -3.1 7.9 -0.7 9.1 MW-52-181 5/20/14 3.60E+02 3.93E+02 -0.7 0.8 1.9 6.3 0.8 6.8 MW-52-48 5/20/14 2.09E+02 3.90E+02 0.4 1.4 -1.2 8.4 4.7 7.6 MW-52-64 5/20/14 -6.03E+01 3.60E+02 0.5 0.8 -0.6 7.7 2.2 7.6 MW-53-120 1/31/14 5,SSE+03 7.74E+02 36.4 5.6 -0.7 8.7 -2.7 6.5 5.0 16.8 MW-53-120 4/10/14 4.77E+03 7.20E+02 30.7 4.4 1.9 8.5 -0.5 8.1 15.5 22.1 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 62 of 70_ Analysis Results*Well ID Date H3 (pCi/L) Sr-90 (pDOL) Cs-137(pCO/L)
Co-60 (pCI/IL) NI-63 (pCi/L)Result N3 Result 3 3" Result 3- Result :.::3ua..
Result .30" MW-53-120 7/14/14 5.21E+03 7.86E+02 17.9 3.5 0.3 6.9 0.9 5.8 5.2 20.0 MW-53-120 10/28/14 5.42E+03 6.84E+02 23.6 3.6 -1.3 7.7 -2.1 8.7 1.5 19.1 MW-53-82 1/31/14 1.14E+03 4.68E+02 1.7 1.8 6.6 12.2 -2.3 6.8 1.8 18.0 MW-53-82 4/10/14 7.19E+02 4.65E+02 0.7 1.2 2.3 9.0 1.9 8.8 5.4 21.7 MW-53-82 7/14/14 9.61E+02 4.50E+02 0.9 1.7 1.5 7.1 -0.5 6.8 0.5 20.0 MW-53-82 10/28/14 1.1OE+03 4.38E+02 1.2 1.8 2.3 6.1 2.5 7.4 -10.2 19.1 MW-54-123 1/21/14 7.53E+03 8.70E+02 1.3 1.8 -0.4 8.6 0.2 10.7 4.2 17.5 MW-54-123 4/11/14 7.31E+03 1.19E+03 0.2 1.5 -0.9 6.9 3.9 8.0 15.7 23.8 MW-54-123 8/1/14 6.90E+03 8.52E+02 -1.2 1.4 -2.4 7.2 6.9 7.0 0.7 21.0 MW-54-123 10/23/14 7.34E+03 7.80E+02 1.1 1.2 -2.6 8.7 2.1 7.9 -15.4 18.2 MW-54-144 1/21/14 6.01E+03 7.83E+02 6.1 2.8 -0.9 9.1 -1.5 6.9 -2.6 17.0 MW-54-144 4/11/14 5.55E+03 1.07E+03 6.8 2.2 2.5 9.7 1.3 7.1 20.9 20.4 MW-54-144 8/1/14 5.90E+03 8.04E+02 5.8 2.5 0.2 6.2 2.0 7.6 -4.0 19.9 MW-54-144 10/23/14 5.80E+03 7.17E+02 9.0 2.3 -1.5 7.6 -1.9 6.0 -15.1 18.2 MW-54-173 1/21/14 5.79E+03 7.77E+02 2.2 2.0 -1.7 7.7 3.1 8.3 -4.9 17.0 MW-54-173 4/11/14 4.97E+03 1.02E+03 4.9 2.1 -1.8 8.6 1.6 8.4 4.8 21.4 MW-54-173 8/1/14 5.24E+03 7.59E+02 2.1 1.9 2.4 7.4 2.1 7.2 4.0 20.0 MW-54-173 10/23/14 4.85E+03 6.66E+02 4.3 1.8 0.1 7.6 5.1 5.4 -18.2 18.3 MW-54-190 1/21/14 5.11E+03 7.44E+02 14.2 3.4 0.9 8.8 3.1 7.6 1.9 16.7 MW-54-190 4/11/14 5.19E+03 1.04E+03 14.0 3.5 0.1 7.3 -1.9 11.3 -0.7 20.8 MW-54-190 8/1/14 5.49E+03 7.80E+02 13.2 3.3 0.0 7.9 -1.1 6.3 14.9 18.1 MW-54-190 10/23/14 4.56E+03 6.42E+02 15.9 2.7 -2.3 8.3 -0.6 8.8 -14.7 18.4 MW-54-37 1/21/14 4.33E+03 6.99E+02 2.1 2.0 -2.5 8.1 1.1 7.0 7.1 17.4 MW-54-37 4/11/14 4.45E+03 7.23E+02 3.7 1.8 -7.0 7.7 0.2 6.8 7.9 22.5 MW-54-37 8/1/14 4.32E+03 7.14E+02 3.5 2.1 3.9 6.7 5.3 7.0 8.0 22.2 MW-54-37 10/23/14 3.82E+03 6.18E+02 3.4 1.8 -2.1 6.1 0.9 7.6 -8.8 18.3 MW-54-58 1/21/14 6.71E+03 8.19E+02 0.1 1.5 5.3 14.3 -0.8 7.0 1.7 17.6 MW-54-58 4/11/14 6.98E+03 1.17E+03 0.0 1.4 3.9 6.7 0.8 7.8 14.6 24.6 MW-54-58 8/1/14 6.43E+03 8.16E+02 -0.1 1.4 -2.0 8.8 -0.7 9.1 -8.0 20.3 MW-54-58 10/23/14 5.70E+03 7.08E+02 0.6 1.4 2.6 7.1 1.2 7.1 -13.1 18.3 MW-55-24 1/16/14 1.13E+03 4.71E+02 17.6 4.1 9.7 12.3 0.5 7.6 0.6 16.5 MW-55-24 5/21/14 1.46E+03 4.56E+02 23.5 4.3 2.4 5.7 1.0 6.4 -14.6 17.9 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 63 of 70 I 3o -_,___________, -: Analysis Results* ,_______, _ ,_ ....Well ID Dat H3 (pCi/I) Sr-90 (pCi/I) Cs-137 (pCI/I) ir Co-60 (pCi/I) N 1-63 (pCi/I)Dt Result 3 Iesult i 3 Result 3 o Result 3 Ia Result i 3 o MW-55-24 6/23/14 6.10E+03 MW-55-24 7/21/14 1.68E+03 5.34E+02 16.1 3.8 1.0 7.8 -0.7 6.7 6.4 18.8 MW-55-24 8/25/14 1.29E+03 MW-55-24 10/17/14 2.84E+03 6.30E+02 15.1 3.0 0.1 5.6 -2.4 5.6 -20.0 21.6 MW-55-35 1/16/14 1.42E+03 4.95E+02 16.1 3.9 3.2 6.4 -0.2 8.4 0.3 17.6 MW-55-35 5/21/14 1.80E+03 4.95E+02 28.8 4.5 4.3 8.9 0.3 8.7 2.8 19.3 MW-55-35 6/23/14 1.80E+03 MW-55-35 7/21/14 2.63E+03 5.76E+02 22.3 4.0 -1.5 6.2 2.7 9.9 -0.3 19.0 MW-55-35 8/25/14 2.84E+03 MW-55-35 10/17/14 5.12E+03 7.74E+02 33.2 3.9 -1.3 6.5 1.9 6.5 -7.4 19.4 MW-55-54 1/16/14 4.21E+03 6.90E+02 16.2 3.9 -6.7 8.3 -2.3 7.1 1.7 17.5 MW-55-54 5/21/14 5.66E+03 7.26E+02 17.3 3.8 1.7 7.0 4.2 7.4 -11.8 17.4 MW-55-54 6/23/14 1.17E+04 MW-55-54 7/21/14 6.42E+03 8.19E+02 14.5 3.3 -1.6 6.6 1.2 8.6 12.3 20.9 MW-55-54 8/25/14 6.62E+03 MW-55-54 9/17/14 7.70E+03 MW-55-54 10/17/14 1.22E+04 1.11E+03 12.2 2.7 1.5 5.3 3.0 4.9 13.3 19.5 MW-55-54 11/5/14 9.90E+03 II MW-55-54 12/12/14 1.16E+04 MW-56-53 1/27/14 3.94E+02 4.29E+02 -0.6 1.3 0.9 11.7 -3.1 11.0 MW-56-53 4/3/14 3.50E+03 6.30E+02 0.6 1.5 -0.6 7.0 -7.0 9.8 MW-56-53 10/28/14 9.27E+02 4.89E+02 1.3 1.8 17.3 13.4 2.0 7.2 MW-56-83 1/27/14 8.17E+03 8.91E+02 0.0 1.6 1.1 8.6 -1.5 9.6 MW-56-83 4/3/14 9.42E+03 1.34E+03 0.4 1.4 -1.4 8.5 -0.7 10.0 1 MW-56-83 10/28/14 3.93E+03 7.05E+02 -0.3 1.5 2.8 7.0 2.6 7.6 MW-57-11 4/30/14 7.08E+03 1.18E+03 34.4 4.1 -1.0 8.6 1.1 7.6 10.4 18.2 MW-57-20 4/30/14 5.19E+03 1.04E+03 0.8 1.7 -1.2 7.1 3.2 8.9 15.6 20.1 MW-57-45 4/30/14 4.77E+03 9.90E+02 0.9 1.2 1.9 8.0 0.7 7.4 6.4 19.7 MW-58-26 5/5/14 3.42E+03 6.27E+02 -0.9 1.4 1.1 7.4 -3.1 11.1 MW-58-26 10/8/14 1.67E+03 5.49E+02 1.2 1.8 -1.7 9.8 4.8 7.1 MW-58-65 5/5/14 1.27E+03 6.27E+02 0.3 1.3 -3.5 9.2 -1.2 9.1 MW-58-65 10/8/14 1.22E+03 5.07E+02 -0.3 1.4 -2.4 5.9 -2.1 6.8 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 64 of 70.... ._ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ Analysis Results* .... _Well ID Date H3 (pCi/I) Sr-90 (pC[/L) Cs-137'(pCI/L)
Co-60 (pCI/L) 11 Ni-63 (pCI/L)Result F 3a Result 3a. Result .3 .Result.. J 3o Result a3.MW-59-32 3/27/14 2.71E+03 6.54E+02 -1.0 1.3 -7.6 9.2 -1.7 8.5 MW-59-45 3/27/14 2.78E+03 6.63E+02 0.6 1.7 -2.4 11.4 -0.5 11.0 MW-59-68 3/27/14 9.85E+02 4.95E+02 -1.1 1.2 0.2 7.5 -1.2 6.8 MW-60-135 1/17/14 6.37E+00 3.96E+02 0.0 1.2 -6.9 10.4 2.2 6.7 MW-60-135 5/16/14 1.69E+02 3.54E+02 0.5 1.6 -2.9 7.7 1.6 6.5 MW-60-135 8/7/14 2.25E+02 4.50E+02 0.2 1.2 1.7 8.7 -0.1 6.1 MW-60-135 10/9/14 1.15E+02 3.60E+02 0.5 1.7 -0.5 6.4 6.4 8.1 MW-60-154 1/17/14 5.12E+02 4.53E+02 0.2 1.2 2.4 6.0 1.8 9.6 MW-60-154 5/16/14 5.07E+02 4.02E+02 1.9 2.0 0.3 5.8 0.1 6.5 MW-60-154 8/7/14 5.32E+02 3.93E+02 0.4 1.2 0.7 6.3 -2.3 5.7 MW-60-154 10/9/14 4.53E+02 4.08E+02 -0.2 1.6 2.4 10.8 2.2 8.2 MW-60-176 1/17/14 7.64E+02 4.71E+02 0.6 1.0 3.7 7.5 -1.0 7.8 MW-60-176 5/16/14 1.09E+03 4.62E+02 0.0 1.6 2.4 7.1 -0.5 7.8 MW-60-176 8/7/14 1.23E+03 4.89E+02 -0.4 1.4 0.0 10.5 1.5 5.6 MW-60-176 10/9/14 1.03E+03 4.92E+02 -0.6 1.6 0.2 7.7 0.2 8.9 MW-60-35 1/17/14 8.21E+01 3.99E+02 0.5 1.2 0.8 6.4 3.8 7.2 MW-60-35 5/16/14 2.90E+02 3.63E+02 -1.3 1.3 -0.5 6.6 5.4 4.5 MW-60-35 8/7/14 -9.OOE+00 3.90E+02 -0.9 1.1 -1.5 8.7 -1.2 10.1 MW-60-35 10/9/14 3.53E+01 4.02E+02 -0.4 1.6 1.5 8.8 -2.2 7.1 MW-60-53 1/17/14 9.17E+01 4.02E+02 -0.4 1.1 4.5 9.5 -0.4 8.8 5.5 24.1 MW-60-53 5/16/14 2.16E+02 3.63E+02 -0.5 1.2 0.0 9.3 0.6 6.4 -4.3 18.5 MW-60-53 8/7/14 1.21E+02 4.23E+02 -0.3 1.0 0.6 7.5 2.7 7.9 -7.8 22.6 MW-60-53 10/9/14 2.82E+01 3.66E+02 0.6 1.6 2.1 5.7 3.6 6.5 -13.8 18.7 MW-60-72 1/17/14 1.01E+02 4.02E+02 0.0 1.1 -3.9 8.5 0.4 6.6 MW-60-72 5/16/14 2.42E+02 3.69E+02 -0.4 1.5 1.5 6.4 2.7 6.5 MW-60-72 8/7/14 1.71E+02 4.41E+02 -0.4 1.0 0.8 6.5 2.0 5.5 MW-60-72 10/9/14 1.24E+02 3.72E+02 0.3 1.5 0.5 6.4 -1.2 7.1 MW-62-138 1/15/14 2.71E+03 6.30E+02 0.1 0.7 1.6 6.3 -1.9 6.6 MW-62-138 5/7/14 3.31E+03 8.73E+02 0.5 1.5 0.7 7.4 -1.1 6.8 MW-62-138 7/27/14 2.50E+03 5.88E+02 -0.8 1.2 0.6 9.1 3.0 6.1.MW-62-138 8/20/14 1.10E+03 MW-62-138 9/16/14 2.20E+03 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 65 of 70*T .______:.__
Analvsis Results**[ Well ID Dat. 3 (pC/L) Sr-90 (pCiIL) Cs4137 (pCI/L) C60(pCi/L)
NI-63 (pCI/I)i.: ... ..Result I a. Result I3o .esl Result ReutI30 Result I3 MW-62-138 10/17/14 2.36E+03 5.49E+02 1.5 1.6 2.4 6.8 0.8 5.9 MW-62-138 11/7/14 1.90E+03 MW-62-138 12/16/14 3.80E+03 MW-62-18 1/15/14 8.28E+01 3.90E+02 0.4 1.0 0.7 9.5 -1.8 6.7 MW-62-18 5/7/14 1.82E+01 3.15E+02 0.6 1.4 2.3 7.1 6.6 8.1 MW-62-18 7/26/14 4.65E+01 4.23E+02 -0.2 1.5 -0.5 7.8 -0.3 6.3 MW-62-18 8/20/14 <MDC MW-62-18 10/17/14 -7.79E+00 3.90E+02 0.3 1.2 0.2 6.2 1.1 5.6 MW-62-182 1/15/14 1.16E+03 4.86E+02 1.3 1.2 1.6 7.2 1.8 8.0 MW-62-182 5/7/14 1.38E+03 4.89E+02 0.2 1.2 -0.2 9.0 2.6 6.9 MW-62-182 7/27/14 1.41E+03 4.98E+02 -0.6 1.5 -2.0 6.6 0.0 7.1 MW-62-182 8/20/14 2.70E+03 MW-62-182 10/17/14 1.65E+03 5.25E+02 0.9 1.8 -0.4 7.3 0.3 8.4 MW-62-37 1/15/14 7.58E+02 4.80E+02 -0.5 1.4 -2.3 8.3 1.1 6.8 MW-62-37 5/7/14 1.02E+03 5.94E+02 0.2 1.3 8.7 8.5 2.3 6.7 MW-62-37 7/26/14 1.36E+03 4.71E+02 -1.2 1.3 4.2 7.0 2.2 7.8 MW-62-37 8/20/14 6.OOE+02 I I MW-62-37 10/17/14 6.70E+02 4.62E+02 0.1 1.6 2.4 8.2 4.4 5.3 MW-62-53 1/15/14 9.38E+02 4.89E+02 0.4 1.7 4.7 9.6 -2.7 8.4 MW-62-53 5/7/14 1.11E+03 6.06E+02 0.8 1.7 1.9 9.5 3.8 9.0 MW-62-53 7/27/14 1.10E+03 4.89E+02 -0.6 1.4 0.0 5.9 -0.8 6.5 MW-62-53 8/20/14 1.10E+03 MW-62-53 10/17/14 1.16E+03 5.07E+02 0.6 1.2 2.0 6.5 0.6 7.8 MW-62-71 1/15/14 1.65E+03 5.43E+02 -0.4 1.4 -3.6 9.9 3.4 7.1 MW-62-71 5/7/14 2.03E+03 7.29E+02 1.3 1.5 2.1 7.4 2.3 9.4 MW-62-71 7/27/14 2.03E+03 5.40E+02 0.8 1.8 0.8 8.2 -2.0 10.7 MW-62-71 8/20/14 1.90E+03 MW-62-71 10/17/14 1.93E+03 5.70E+02 0.1 1.1 -3.9 7.7 4.4 7.1 MW-62-92 1/15/14 1.61E+03 5.43E+02 -0.5 1.4 0.9 7.4 -0.3 6.2 MW-62-92 5/7/14 2.25E+03 7.59E+02 1.5 1.6 -4.0 7.3 -2.1 8.2 MW-62-92 7/27/14 1.73E+03 5.28E+02 0.6 1.7 2.4 6.5 1.8 8.0 MW-62-92 8/20/14 1.70E+03 1 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 66 of 70*____. ____'.__"_____"____
Analysis Results* _ _.__.". _ ..well ID Date H3 (pCi/L) Sr-90 (pCi/L) Cs-137 (pCi/L) Co-60 (pCi/1) Ni-63 (pCI/L)Result 3 I Result 3 a0 Result I 30 ResultI 30 J Result .3a MW-62-92 9/16/14 1.70E+03 MW-62-92 10/17/14 1.65E+03 5.01E+02 1.2 1.8 0.4 5.5 0.8 6.5 MW-62-92 11/7/14 1.30E+03 MW-62-92 12/16/14 2.20E+03 MW-63-112 1/14/14 1.50E+03 4.53E+02 -0.1 0.8 -2.8 9.1 1.2 5.2 MW-63-112 4/24/14 1.37E+03 4.62E+02 0.8 1.2 3.3 6.7 4.8 10.5 MW-63-112 7/28/14 1.75E+03 4.98E+02 0.0 1.5 1.5 8.6 -2.4 7.2 MW-63-112 10/21/14 2.39E+03 6.06E+02 0.0 1.5 -0.6 8.3 2.1 5.9 MW-63-121 1/14/14 2.17E+03 5.13E+02 0.4 1.6 2.9 8.8 -0.3 6.7 MW-63-121 4/24/14 1.83E+03 5.31E+02 1.5 1.8 1.9 9.1 -9.0 10.9 MW-63-121 7/28/14 2.36E+03 5.55E+02 0.8 1.7 -0.8 6.7 -4.9 9.9_MW-63-121 10/21/14 1.68E+03 5.52E+02 -0.2 1.4 -7.7 9.2 -1.9 8.4 MW-63-163 1/14/14 1.23E+03 4.35E+02 0.0 0.7 1.5 7.7 1.3 7.3 MW-63-163 4/24/14 8.36E+02 4.08E+02 -0.1 1.5 3.4 7.7 -1.4 7.2 MW-63-163 7/28/14 9.69E+02 4.38E+02 0.2 1.4 -2.5 6.6 1.2 5.9 MW-63-163 10/21/14 1.04E+03 4.92E+02 -0.6 0.9 1.0 6.0 1.4 6.1 MW-63-174 1/14/14 1.18E+03 4.32E+02 0.5 1.7 8.0 12.1 -4.4 12.4 MW-63-174 4/24/14 6.87E+02 4.26E+02 -0.5 1.0 7.9 17.0 -1.3 6.5 MW-63-174 7/28/14 1.08E+03 4.80E+02 -0.6 1.2 1.0 7.5 6.5 7.6 MW-63-174 10/21/14 7.81E+02 4.50E+02 -0.4 0.9 -0.6 5.6 3.9 5.9 MW-63-18 1/14/14 2.42E+01 3.90E+02 -0.5 0.9 -2.1 9.2 0.9 6.8 MW-63-18 4/24/14 2.94E+02 3.96E+02 0.1 1.6 0.0 13.7 -0.9 8.3 MW-63-18 7/28/14 1.75E+02 4.38E+02 0.3 1.6 2.2 6.1 1.0 6.3 MW-63-18 10/21/14 7.92E+01 3.99E+02 0.4 1.6 4.0 8.9 -1.9 7.1 MW-63-34 1/14/14 4.27E+02 4.29E+02 -0.4 0.8 -1.7 7.1 -1.2 6.9 MW-63-34 4/24/14 4.03E+02 4.11E+02 1.6 1.9 0.0 8.9 0.1 9.0 MW-63-34 7/28/14 3.51E+02 4.53E+02 -0.5 1.5 2.4 5.2 2.1 6.3 MW-63-34 10/21/14 8.25E+02 4.71E+02 1.4 1.8 1.0 7.6 1.1 8.2 1 MW-63-50 1/14/14 7.33E+02 3.87E+02 0.0 0.9 -0.9 6.6 1.1 7.3 1 MW-63-50 4/24/14 6.89E+02 4.26E+02 0.6 1.5 -0.1 8.6 2.7 8.9 MW-63-50 7/28/14 1.07E+03 4.44E+02 -0.3 1.5 -1.8 6.9 0.7 5.0 MW-63-50 10/21/14 6.08E+02 4.59E+02 -0.1 1.0 -2.7 8.S 1.8 6.8 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 67 of 70:. * .......__ ___ ___ ___ ____ " Analysis Results* .__:_._ " _*_*W ell 10 Date H3 pCi/L) Sr-90 (p~iL). Cs-137 (pCI/L) Co-60 (pCi/i) NI-63 (pCI/L):.Result 3a :.Result T o3___ Result, 3 or Result..:
..3oG. Result- 3a: MW-63-93 1/14/14 7.37E+02 3.90E+02 0.6 1.6 -4.9 8.7 -1.5 8.8 MW-63-93 4/24/14 6.93E+02 4.35E+02 -0.2 1.4 0.6 7.1 1.6 8.5 MW-63-93 7/28/14 1.04E+03 5.19E+02 -0.1 1.6 1.9 6.3 -0.7 6.0 MW-63-93 10/21/14 8.73E+02 4.86E+02 0.5 1.2 2.1 8.1 -4.0 8.4 MW-66-21 2/11/14 5.84E+01 3.84E+02 -0.3 1.6 -2.2 8.4 2.2 8.5 3.9 19.7 MW-66-21 5/14/14 1.41E+02 4.0SE+02 0.9 1.8 -1.0 9.2 0.0 7.0 -13.2 17.3 MW-66-21 7/26/14 1.85E+02 3.84E+02 -0.7 1.0 -0.2 5.9 -2.1 7.9 1.0 20.4 MW-66-21 8/21/14 8.OOE+02 MW-66-21 10/13/14 4.26E+02 4.41E+02 0.2 1.2 2.8 7.1 0.5 4.9 -11.0 19.6 MW-66-36 2/11/14 1.12E+03 5.10E+02 9.9 3.1 -3.4 8.1 2.1 8.1 -0.9 21.0 MW-66-36 5/14/14 1.35E+03 4.71E+02 7.5 2.4 4.5 7.4 -2.2 7.0 -4.8 19.1 MW-66-36 7/26/14 9.15E+02 4.68E+02 8.0 2.7 0.0 6.0 0.2 6.4 8.4 19.0 MW-66-36 8/21/14 1.20E+03 MW-66-36 10/13/14 9.97E+02 4.92E+02 8.1 2.5 -1.8 6.2 1.5 7.0 -7.1 21.1 MW-67-105 1/20/14 2.95E+03 5.70E+02 0.0 1.0 3.3 8.4 2.6 6.8 0.7 21.5 MW-67-105 5/14/14 3.40E+03 6.09E+02 0.1 1.6 3.9 13.7 2.8 7.9 -11.0 22.2 MW-67-105 7/25/14 2.76E+03 6.45E+02 0.5 1.5 1.0 9.1 2.1 7.9 12.9 20.1 MW-67-105 8/21/14 2.50E+03 MW-67-105 9/16/14 2.60E+03 MW-67-105 10/14/14 2.45E+03 5.52E+02 1.0 1.5 -2.8 7.2 0.4 7.7 3.4 21.4 MW-67-105 11/11/14 4.60E+03 MW-67-105 12/16/14 2.70E+03 MW-67-173 1/20/14 8.92E+02 4.02E+02 0.6 1.3 -0.1 8.0 1.0 7.6 -3.4 16.7 MW-67-173 5/14/14 8.79E+02 4.65E+02 -0.4 1.4 -1.2 7.7 -4.8 7.0 -14.3 17.9 MW-67-173 7/25/14 5.81E+02 4.32E+02 -0.6 1.6 4.3 5.3 -1.4 7.7 15.0 17.7 MW-67-173 8/21/14 8.OOE+02 MW-67-173 10/14/14 8.83E+02 4.89E+02 0.3 1.5 -0.6 8.0 -0.8 6.2 -10.7 19.7 MW-67-219 1/20/14 1.16E+03 4.23E+02 -0.5 1.0 -1.4 6.8 -1.8 6.2 5.7 21.1 MW-67-219 5/14/14 1.26E+03 4.83E+02 1.6 1.7 3.2 6.9 3.0 6.9 14.5 18.8 MW-67-219 7/25/14 8.55E+02 4.65E+02 -1.0 1.1 -1.4 6.8 -1.2 7.0 3.7 21.7 MW-67-219 8/21/14 9.OOE+02 MW-67-219 10/14/14 1.02E+03 5.04E+02 0.3 1.2 -2.5 6.9 -0.6 5.5 4.2 23.2 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 68 of 70: ~~~Analysis Results* '; : v Well 16 DateH3piL Iso .i________ ___j H____ ~ I-________
nlssRsls elI ae3 (pC i/I) Sr-90 (pCI/I)1 71 Cs-137 (pC /I, ) Co-60 (pCi/Lf NI-63 (pCI/I)Resutsult 1 33 Result [ " 3o Result. I 3 Resultl 3a MW-67-276 1/20/14 9.02E+02 4.02E+02 -0.2 1.5 -0.5 8.9 2.3 10.0 4.4 22.1 MW-67-276 5/14/14 8.97E+02 4.56E+02 1.0 1.6 1.3 7.4 -2.9 7.3 -3.3 18.3 MW-67-276 7/25/14 8.47E+02 4.53E+02 0.1 1.5 -1.6 5.8 3.0 6.7 13.0 20.0 MW-67-276 8/21/14 9.OOE+02 MW-67-276 10/14/14 7.83E+02 4.80E+02 -0.5 1.2 0.0 6.6 1.0 5.4 -15.3 19.7 MW-67-323 1/20/14 4.15E+02 3.51E+02 -0.2 0.7 -0.1 6.2 2.3 7.8 4.5 18.4 MW-67-323 5/14/14 3.92E+02 4.08E+02 0.4 1.5 2.2 5.9 0.0 6.2 -11.5 19.1 MW-67-323 7/25/14 3.57E+02 3.93E+02 0.9 1.6 1.0 5.7 0.3 6.5 -5.6 20.1 MW-67-323 8/21/14 <MDC MW-67-323 10/14/14 4.48E+02 4.50E+02 0.3 1.3 -0.3 6.5 0.2 6.7 -7.5 21.9 MW-67-340 1/20/14 6.31E+02 3.75E+02 -0.1 0.9 -0.9 9.0 1.1 7.6 -4.3 15.0 MW-67-340 5/14/14 6.86E+02 4.38E+02 0.8 1.7 -1.8 8.1 2.8 7.2 -2.8 13.3 MW-67-340 7/25/14 3.98E+02 4.56E+02 -1.0 1.1 2.3 10.2 -1.9 7.1 3.7 21.7 MW-67-340 8/21/14 <MDC MW-67-340 10/14/14 6.85E+02 4.68E+02 -0.7 1.3 -0.3 7.4 1.9 7.9 -5.2 17.6 MW-67-39 1/20/14 7.43E+02 3.84E+02 9.0 1.4 5.3 8.6 -0.2 9.3 -5.8 25.1 MW-67-39 5/14/14 1.24E+03 4.77E+02 5.7 2.3 -2.7 7.4 1.9 6.2 -1.3 20.6 MW-67-39 7/25/14 2.45E+02 4.44E+02 4.6 2.2 -2.0 7.2 -4.5 4.6 9.4 21.8 MW-67-39 8/21/14 4.50E+03 MW-67-39 9/16/14 <MDC MW-67-39 10/14/14 2.73E+02 4.08E+02 7.1 2.2 2.6 8.1 0.7 8.6 -3.2 21.4 MW-67-39 11/11/14 2.90E+03 MW-67-39 12/16/14 6.OOE+02 MW-68-103 3/25/14 3.02E+03 6.21E+02 0.5 1.6 -2.2 7.7 -1.2 8.8 MW-68-103 5/19/14 2.73E+03 5.61E+02 -0.5 1.5 -1.2 6.7 -0.5 5.6 MW-68-103 8/8/14 2.15E+03 5.55E+02 -0.8 1.2 -3.2 8.3 3.1 10.3 MW-68-103 10/30/14 3.06E+03 6.57E+02 0.4 0.9 5.4 11.4 -0.1 8.4 MW-68-132 3/25/14 2.46E+03 5.88E+02 -0.3 1.5 2.7 9.5 -3.1 8.5 MW-68-132 5/19/14 2.97E+03 5.91E+02 0.5 1.6 1.7 7.9 -1.7 8.8 MW-68-132 8/8/14 2.52E+03 5.91E+02 0.7 1.3 2.3 6.6 0.7 7.2 MW-68-132 10/30/14 2.19E+03 5.97E+02 -0.2 0.9 -0.7 6.9 -2.5 5.8 MW-68-19 3/25/14 2.98E+03 6.24E+02 0.1 1.6 0.0 20.2 2.0 7.4 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 69 of 70.... Analysis Results* ..... : ,.W H3 (pCi/L) teSr9 (pa/L), Cs-137 (POCI/L) Co-60 (pCi/L) Ni-63 (pCi/L)RI ResutI eesult I 3o. Reslt I 3a Result ' 3a MW-68-19 5/19/14 2.67E+03 5.70E+02 0.9 1.7 1.2 8.8 -0.3 9.5 MW-68-19 8/8/14 1.72E+03 5.40E+02 0.8 0.9 -0.7 6.7 -0.5 6.1 MW-68-19 10/30/14 2.00E+03 5.82E+02 0.7 1.0 3.9 7.4 4.1 7.3 MW-68-29 3/25/14 1.78E+03 5.70E+02 0.1 1.6 3.1 10.5 2.0 9.5 MW-68-29 5/19/14 1.89E+03 5.22E+02 0.2 0.8 8.0 8.2 -7.2 9.3 MW-68-29 8/8/14 1.38E+03 5.01E+02 1.0 1.5 1.1 5.2 -2.8 6.6 MW-68-29 10/30/14 1.24E+03 5.07E+02 0.5 1.6 -0.6 7.9 1.7 7.7 MW-68-57 3/25/14 1.57E+03 5.61E+02 1.6 1.9 1.6 8.2 1.2 10.2 MW-68-57 5/19/14 1.85E+03 5.19E+02 0.5 1.6 -2.9 8.3 -0.3 8.9 MW-68-57 8/8/14 1.93E+03 5.49E+02 -0.2 0.8 3.9 8.2 1.0 8.1 MW-68-57 10/30/14 1.93E+03 5.76E+02 0.9 1.0 -0.5 7.6 -2.4 8.9 uI-CSS 1/21/14 1.85E+03 4.86E+02 16.3 1.9 4.9 7.6 0.7 6.7 -14.8 20.3 U1-CSS 4/30/14 5.81E+03 7.74E+02 6.0 2.2 3.0 7.1 -5.3 9.3 16.7 18.9 uI-CSS 10/23/14 4.91E+03 7.68E+02 8.7 2.3 -2.1 7.7 -3.3 8.0 -11.0 21.5 U1-NCD 2/20/14 4.63E+03 6.90E+02 35.6 5.1 16900 256 3.0 8.4 277 33 U1-NCD 3/3/14 5.41E+03 7.68E+02 69.2 6.8 25000 183 0.7 5.3 268 34 U1-NCD 5/26/14 3.41E+03 6.03E+02 32.1 5.1 14300 174 0.9 6.2 258 34 U1-NCD 8/18/14 1.49E+04 1.15E+03 49.3 5.6 13400 181 7.2 7.8 392 36 U1-SFDS 2/19/14 7.80E+03 9.OOE+02 5.0 2.4 2.0 7.1 -0.5 7.5 0.2 19.2 U1-SFDS 3/5/14 9.94E+02 4.41E+02 3.6 2.2 6.1 6.7 5.0 6.0 -5.8 17.4 U1-SFDS 5/28/14 1.47E+02 3.57E+02 2.5 1.9 2.7 5.7 1.5 7.2 17.6 21.0 U1-SFDS 8/20/14 2.07E+02 4.08E+02 3.9 2.1 3.5 6.3 -1.2 5.9 -3.7 21.6 U1-SFDS 11/12/14 1.79E+02 3.93E+02 3.3 1.8 4.0 5.8 -0.8 5.2 -3.7 14.6 U3-4D 1/29/14 1.14E+03 4.26E+02 0.2 1.1 -0.3 6.9 -1.3 5.9 U3-4D 4/28/14 6.91E+02 4.32E+02 -0.1 1.2 -3.3 9.1 0.2 10.2 U3-4D 7/29/14 1.01E+03 4.62E+02 -0.3 1.6 3.5 7.1 4.5 7.6 U3-4D 10/8/14 1.22E+03 5.19E+02 0.0 1.4 0.4 5.8 -1.6 6.9 U3-4S 1/29/14 8.30E+02 3.96E+02 -0.4 0.9 -0.1 7.1 1.6 7.7 U3-4S 4/28/14 1.12E+03 4.77E+02 0.9 1.7 6.5 7.9 -1.6 7.3 U3-4S 7/29/14 6.64E+02 4.32E+02 -0.5 1.3 2.9 7.0 -3.0 7.7 U3-4S 10/8/14 8.63E+02 4.83E+02 1.2 1.2 1.6 11.4 -3.2 6.3 LU3-T1 1/7/14 2.84E+03 5.91E+02 -0.3 1.5 -1.7 8.0 3.6 8.2 Docket No. 50-3, 50-247, 50-286 Page 70 of 70..___ __.._ __...._ _.___*_ _*.__ Analysis Results* _. _ .__* _ _Well ID Date H3 (pCi/L) 3Sr-90 (pCilL) Cs-137 (pCl/L) Co-60 (pCi/L) Ni-63 (pCi/L)Result___
I 3lt* Result::,.
Result. 33 1..e.sult7J c*~1 3a Result ..:3 I eul"I 3 U3-T1 5/8/14 1.55E+03 4.74E+02 -0.4 1.3 4.4 11.7 3.6 5.7 U3-T1 8/13/14 1.26E+03 4.92E+02 0.5 1.7 -1.0 6.0 2.3 5.1 U3-T1 10/22/14 1.55E+03 5.52E+02 0.2 1.4 -3.2 6.9 0.6 7.5 U3-T2 1/7/14 1.44E+03 4.80E+02 0.5 1.6 -1.0 7.6 -3.2 9.8 U3-T2 5/8/14 1.24E+03 4.50E+02 0.6 1.1 3.8 11.2 0.4 10.1 U3-T2 8/13/14 1.78E+03 5.40E+02 -0.9 1.3 2.7 9.5 2.5 10.1 1 U3-T2 10/22/14 1.86E+03 5.70E+02 0.4 1.3 0.1 7.8 -1.8 7.8-3T 10221 t1 is -1. 7.8 Samples With Other Positive Well ID Date." Co-58 (pCI/L) Cr-51 (pCi/L)*__ ..,. Result 3 o
- Result .. 3 o( .MW-31-63 3/27/14 25 16.9 374 222 MW-31-63 4/9/14 12.8 7.9 101 82 MW-31-63 4/19/14 4.1 11.0 69 70 MW-31-85 3/27/14 6.0 9.9 146 129 MW-32-59 3/28/14 51.5 18.9 1340 193 MW-32-59 4/8/14 13.4 19.2 274 166 MW-32-59 4/15/14 44.1 15.2 380 219 MW-32-59 4/23/14 10.2 9.9 272 136 MW-32-59 6/3/14 18.6 14.6 69 154 MW-32-59 6/26/14 18.1 11.5 18 87 MW-32-59 7/2/14 18.1 15.4 99 196 MW-32-59 8/17/14 16.9 11.5 -85 127* Positive results are in bold.** <MDC -Minimum Detectable activity, these were non positive values H-3 positive results without any 3 a value or values < MDC were extra analyses performed onsite ENCLOSURE 2 TO NL-15-048 Process Control Program ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS.50-003, 50-247 AND 50-286 Procedure Contains NMM ECH eB REFLIB Forms: YES NO HQN Effective Procedure Owner: Donnie Marvel Governance Owner: David Moore Date Title: Manager, RP Title: Manager, Fleet RP 3/25/14 Site: ANO Site: HQN Site Site Procedure Champion Title ANO Donnie Marvel Manager, RP BRP N/A N/A CNS Bob Beilke Manager, RP GGNS Roy Miller Manager, RP IPEC Frank Mitchell Manager, RP JAF Robert Brown Manager, RP PLP Doug Watkins Manager, RP PNPS Steven Brewer Manager, RP RBS Jim Hogan Manager, RP (acting)VY David Tkatch Manager, RP W3 Daniel Frey Manager, RP HQN David Moore Manager, Fleet RP For site implementation dates see ECH eB REFLIB using site tree view (Navigation panel).Site and NMM Procedures Canceled or Superseded By This Revision None Process Aoplicability Exclusion:
All Sites: 1-1 Specific Sites: ANO El BRP EL CNS El GGNS EL IPEC-I JAF EL PLP LI PNPS-I RBS EL VY EL W3 EL Change Statement Editorial revision to address the issue identified in CR-HQN-2013-00858, CA-02 (Develop a draft procedure that includes instructions for vendors processing waste still owned by Entergy to comply with the PCP program.)Reworded Step 5.1[11](b) to improve clarity: inserted text "processed on-site OR off-site by vendors" Associated PRHQN #: PR-PRHQN-2014-00048 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Paae 1.0 PURPOSE ............................................................................
3
2.0 REFERENCES
.....................................................................
3 3.0 DEFINITIO NS ........................................................................
6 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
.............................................................
9 5.0 DETAILS .............................................................................
10 6.0 INTERFACES
......................................................................
20 7.0 RECORDS .........................................................................
20 8.0 SITE SPECIFIC COM M ITM ENTS ......................................
21 9.0 ATTACHM ENTS ..................................................................
21 1.0 PURPOSE The Process Control Program (PCP) requires formulas, sampling, analyses, test and determinations to be made to ensure that the processing and packing of solid radioactive wastes based on demonstrated processing of actual or simulated wet solid wastes will be accomplished in such a way as to assure compliance with 10 CFR Parts 20, 61 and 71, State Regulations, burial ground requirements, and other requirements governing the disposal of solid radioactive waste. The scope of a PCP is to assure that radioactive waste will be handled, shipped, and disposed of in a safe manner in accordance with approved site or vendor procedures, whichever is applicable.
[GGNS UFSAR, Chapter 16B.1 I TRM -7.6.3.8 paragraph 1]1.1 The purpose of this document is to provide a description of the solid radioactive waste Process Control Program (PCP) at all the Entergy fleet sites. The PCP describes the methods used for processing, classification and packaging low-level wet radioactive waste into a form acceptable for interim on-site storage, shipping and disposal, in accordance with 10 CFR Part 61 and current disposal site criteria.1.2 To ensure the safe operation of the solid radwaste system, the solid radwaste system will be used in accordance with this Process Control Program to process radioactive wastes to meet interim on-site storage, shipping and burial ground requirements.
1.3 This document addresses the process control program in the context of disposal criteria, on-site processing and vendor processing requirements.
1.4 The Process Control Program implements the requirements of 1 0CFR50.36a and General Design Criteria 60 of Appendix A to 10CFR Part 50. The process parameters included in the Process Control Program may include but are not limited to waste type, waste pH, waste/liquid/solidification agent/catalyst ratios, waste oil content, waste principal chemical constituents, and mixing and curing times.1.5 This document does NOT address the requirements for 1 0CFR Part 61.56 (waste characteristics) for material sent to intermediate processors, because the final treatment and packaging is performed at the vendor facilities.
2.0 REFERENCES
[1] EN-QV-1 04, "Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual Control"[2] Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations
[3] Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 20
- 2. 0 continued[4] Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 61[5] Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 71, Appendix H [QAPM, Section A.1.c][6] Low-Level Waste Licensing Branch Technical Position on Radioactive Waste Classification, 11 May 1983[7] Disposal Site Criteria and License[8] Waste Processor Acceptance Criteria[9] EN-LI-100, "Process Applicability Determination"[10] NRC Information and Enforcement Bulletins* NRC Information Notice 79-19: Packaging of Low-Level Radioactive Waste for Transport and Burial.* NRC Information Notice 80-24: Low-Level Radioactive Waste Burial Criteria.* NRC Information Notice 80-32: Clarification of Certain Requirements for Exclusive-Use Shipments of Radioactive Materials.
- NRC Information Notice 80-32, Rev. 1: Clarification of Certain Requirements for Exclusive-Use Shipments of Radioactive Materials.
- NRC Information Notice 83-05: Obtaining Approval for Disposing of Very-Low-Level Radioactive Waste -1OCFR Section 20.302.* NRC Information Notice 83-10: Clarification of Several Aspects Relating to Use of NRC-Certified Transport Packages.* NRC Information Notice 83-33: Non-Representative Sampling of Contaminated Oil.* NRC Information Notice 84-50: Clarification of Scope of Quality Assurance Programs for Transport Packages Pursuant to 1OCFR 50 Appendix B.* NRC Information Notice 84-72: Clarification of Conditions for Waste Shipments Subject to Hydrogen Gas Generation.
- NRC Information Notice 85-92: Surveys of Wastes Before Disposal from Nuclear Reactor Facilities.
- NRC Information Notice 86-20: Low-Level Radioactive Waste Scaling Factors, 10CFR 61.* NRC Information Notice 86-90: Requests to Dispose of Very Low-Level Radioactive Waste Pursuant 1OCFR 20.302
- 2. 0[10], continued* NRC Information Notice 87-03: Segregation of Hazardous and Low-Level Radioactive Wastes* NRC Information Notice 87-07: Quality Control of On-Site Dewatering/
Solidification Operations by Outside Contractors
[11] NRC Information and Enforcement Bulletins (continued)
NRC Information Notice 89-27: Limitations on the Use of Waste Forms and High Integrity Containers for the Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste* NRC Information Notice 92-62: Emergency Response Information Requirements for Radioactive Material Shipments* NRC Information Notice 92-72: Employee Training and Shipper Registration Requirements for Transporting Radioactive Materials NRC Generic Letter 89-01, "Implementation of Programmatic Controls for Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications in the Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications and the Relocation of Procedural Details of RETS to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual or to the Process Control Program".[12] Nureg-0800 Standard Review Plan Section 11.4 Revision 2, Solid Waste Management Systems.[13] NRC Waste Form Technical Position, Revision 1 Jan 24 1991.[14] NRC SECY 94-198 Review of Existing Guidance Concerning the Extended Storage of Low-Level Radioactive Waste.[15] EPRI TR-106925 Rev-1, Interim On-Site Storage of Low Level Waste: Guidelines for Extended Storage -October1996
[16] NRC Branch Technical Position On Concentration Averaging And Encapsulation Jan 17 1995[17] Commitment Documents (U-2 and U-3)IPN-99-079, "Supplement to Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Incorporating Recommendations of Generic Letter 89-01 and the Revised 10 CFR Part 20 and 10 CFR Part 50.36a.* Appendix B Technical Specifications, Section 4.5 [IP, RECS ODCM Part 1]
3.0 DEFINITIONS
[1] Batch -A quantity of waste to be processed having essentially consistent physical and chemical characteristics as determined through past experience or system operation knowledge by the Radwaste Shipping Specialist.
A batch could be a waste tank, several waste tanks grouped together or a designated time period such as between outages as with the DAW waste stream. An isolated quantity of feed waste to be processed having essentially constant physical and chemical characteristics.(The addition or removal of water will not be considered to create a new batch).[2] Certificate of Compliance
-Document issued by the USNRC regulating use of a NRC licensed cask or issued by (SCDHEC) South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Conservation regulating a High Integrity Container.
[3] Chelating Agents -EDTA, DTPA, hydroxy-carboxylic acids, citric acid, carbolic acid and glucinic acid.[4] Compaction
-The process of volume reducing solid waste by applying external pressure.[5] Confirmatory Analysis -The practice of verifying that gross radioactivity measurements using MCA are reasonably consistent with independent laboratory sample data.[6] Dewatered Waste -Wet waste that has been processed by means other than solidification, encapsulation, or absorption to meet the free standing liquid requirements of 1 CFR Part 61.56 (a)(3) and (b)(2).[7] De-watering
-The removal of water or liquid from a waste form, usually by gravity or pumping.[8] Dilution Factor -The RADMAN computer code factor to account for the non-radioactive binder added to the waste stream in the final product when waste is solidified.
[9] Dry Waste -Radioactive waste which exist primarily in a non-liquid form and includes such items as dry materials, metals, resins, filter media and sludges.[10] Encapsulation
-Encapsulation is a means of providing stability for certain types of waste by surrounding the waste by an appropriate encapsulation media.[11] Gamma-Spectral-Analysis
-Also known as IG, MCA, Ge/Li and gamma spectroscopy.
[12] Gross Radioactivity Measurements
-More commonly known as dose to curie conversion for packaged waste characterization and classification.
- 3. 0 continued[13] Homogeneous
-Of the same kind or nature; essentially alike. Most Volumetric waste streams are considered homogeneous for purposes of waste classification.
[14] Incineration
-The process of burning a combustible material to reduce its volume and yield an ash residue.[15] Liquid Waste -Radioactive waste that exist primarily in a liquid form and is contained in other than installed plant systems, to include such items as oil, EHC fluid, and other liquids. This waste is normally processed off-site.[16] Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLW) -Those wastes containing source, special nuclear, or by-product material that are acceptable for disposal in a land disposal facility.
For the purposes of this definition, low-level radioactive waste has the same meaning as in the Low-Level Waste Policy Act, that is, radioactive waste not classified as high-level radioactive waste, transuranic waste, spent nuclear fuel, or by-product material as defined in section 11 e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act (uranium or thorium tailings and waste).[17] Measurement of Specific Radionuclides
-More commonly known as direct sample or container sample using MCA data for packaged waste characterization and classification.
[18] Operable -A system, subsystem, train, component or device SHALL be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified functions(s), and when all necessary attendant instrumentation, controls, electrical power, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component, or device to perform its function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s).
[19] Prequalification Program -The testing program implemented to demonstrate that the proposed method of wet waste processing will result in a waste form acceptable to the land disposal facility and the NRC.[20] Processing
-Changing, modifying, and/or packaging radioactive waste into a form that is acceptable to a disposal facility.[21] Quality Assurance/Quality Control -As used in this document, "quality assurance" comprises all those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a structure, system, or component will perform satisfactorily in service.Quality assurance includes quality control, which comprises those quality assurance actions related to the physical characteristics of a material structure, component, or system to predetermined requirements.
3.0, continued[22] Reportable Quantity Radionuclides (RQ) -Any radionuclide listed in column (1) of Table 2 of 49CFR Part 172.101 which is present in quantities as listed in column (3) of Table 2 of 49CFR Part 172.101.[23] Sampling Plan -A program to ensure that representative samples from the feed waste and the final waste form are obtained and tested for conformance with parameters stated in the PCP and waste form acceptance criteria.[24] Scaling Factor -A dimensionless number which relates the concentration of an easy to measure radionuclide (gamma emitter) to one which is difficult to measure (beta and/or alpha emitters).
[25] Significant Quantity -For purposes of waste classification all the following radionuclide values SHALL be considered significant and must be reported on the disposal manifest.* Any value (real or LLD) for radionuclides listed in Appendix G to 10CFR20 (H-3, C-14,1-129, Tc-99)." Greater than or equal to 1 percent of the concentration limits as listed in 1 OCR Part 61.55 Table 1.* Greater than or equal to 1 percent of the Class A concentration limits listed in 10CFR Part 61.55 Table 2.* Greater than or equal to 1 percent of the total activity.* Greater than or equal to 1 percent of the Reportable Quantity limits listed on 49CFR Part 172.101 Table 2.[26] Solidification
-The conversion of wet waste into a free-standing monolith by the addition of an agent so that the waste meets the stability and free-standing liquid requirements of the disposal site.[27] Special Radionuclides
-The RADMAN computer code term for radionuclides listed in Appendix G to 1OCFR20 (i.e., H-3, C-14, 1-129 & Tc-99)[28] Stability
-Structural stability per 1 OCFR61.2, Waste Form Technical Position, and Waste Form Technical Position Revision 1. This can be provided by the waste form, or by placing the waste in a disposal container or structure that provides stability after disposal.
Stability requires that the waste form maintain its structural integrity under the expected disposal conditions.
3.0, continued[29] Training -A systematic program that ensures a person has knowledge of hazardous materials and hazardous materials regulations.
[30] Type A Package -Is the packaging together with its radioactive contents limited to Al or A2 as appropriate that meets the requirements of 49CFR Part 173.410 and Part 173.412, and is designed to retain the integrity of containment and shielding under normal conditions of transport as demonstrated by the tests set forth in 49CFR Part 173.465 or Part 173.466 as appropriate.
[31] Type B Package -Is the packaging together with its radioactive contents that is designed to retain the integrity of containment and shielding when subjected to the normal conditions of transport and hypothetical accident test conditions set forth in 10CFR Part 71.[32] Volume Reduction
-any process that reduces the volume of waste. This includes but is not limited to, compaction and incineration.
[33] Waste Container
-A vessel of any shape, size, and composition used to contain the waste media.[34] Waste Form -Waste in a waste container acceptable for disposal at a licensed disposal facility.[35] Waste Stream -A Plant specific and constant source of waste with a distinct radionuclide content and distribution.
[36] Waste Type -A single packaging configuration and waste form tied to a specific waste stream.4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
[1] The Vice President Operations Support (VPOS) is responsible for the implementation of this procedure.
[2] Each site Senior Nuclear Executive (SNE) is responsible for ensuring that necessary site staff implements this procedure.
[3] The Low Level RadWaste (LLRW) Focus Group is responsible for evaluating and recommending changes and revisions to this procedure.
4.0, continued[4] Each site RP Department
-Radwaste Supervisor
/ Specialist (title may vary at the site's respectively) has the overall responsibility for implementing the PCP and is responsible for processing and transportation is tasked with the day-to-day responsibilities for the following:
- Implementing the requirements of this document.* Ensuring that radioactive waste is characterized and classified in accordance with 1 OCFR Part 61.55 and Part 61.56.* Ensuring that radioactive waste is characterized and classified in accordance with volume reduction facility and disposal site licenses and other requirements.
- Designating other approved procedures (if required) to be implemented in the packaging of any specific batch of waste.* Providing a designated regulatory point of contact between the Plant and the NRC, volume reduction facility or disposal site.* Maintaining records of on-site and off-site waste stream sample analysis and Plant evaluations.
- Suspending shipments of defectively processed or defectively packaged radioactive wastes from the site when the provisions of this process control program are not satisfied.
5.0 DETAILS An isotopic analysis SHALL be performed on every batch for each waste stream so that the waste can be classified in accordance with 10CFR61. The isotopic and curie content of each shipping container SHALL be determined in accordance with 49CFR packaging requirements.
The total activity in the container may be determined by either isotopic analysis or by dose-rate-to-curie conversion.
5.1. Precautions and Limitations
[1] Precautions (a) Radioactive materials SHALL be handled in accordance with applicable radiation protection procedures.(b) All radioactive waste processed on-site OR off-site by vendors must be processed or packaged to meet the minimum requirements listed in 10CFR Part 61.56 (a) (1) through (8).
- 5. 11], continued (c) If the provisions of the Process Control Program are not satisfied, suspend shipment of the defectively processed or defectively packaged waste from the site. Shipment may be accomplished when the waste is processed
/ packaged in accordance with the Process Control Program.(d) The generation of combustible gases is dependent on the waste form, radioactive concentration and accumulated dose in the waste. Changes to organic inputs (e.g. oil) to waste stream may change biogas generation rates.[2] Limitations (a) Only qualified personnel will characterize OR package radioactive waste OR radioactive materials for transportation or disposal.(b) All site personnel that have any involvement with radioactive waste management computer software SHALL be familiar with its functions, operation and maintenance.
5.2. Waste Management Practices[1] Waste processing methods include the following: (a) Present and planned practice is NOT to solidify or encapsulate any waste streams.(b) Waste being shipped directly for burial in a HIC (High Integrity Container) is dewatered to less than 1 percent by volume prior to shipment.(c) Waste being shipped directly for burial in a container other than a HIC is dewatered to less than 0.5 percent by volume prior to shipment.(d) IF solidification is required in the future, THEN at least one representative test specimen from at least every 10th batch of each type of radioactive waste will be checked to verify solidification.
(1) IF any specimen fails to verify solidification, THEN the solidification of the batch under test SHALL be suspended until such time as additional test specimens can be obtained, alternative solidification parameters can be determined, and a subsequent test verifies solidification.
If alternative parameters are determined, the subsequent tests shall be verified using the alternative parameters determined.
5.2[1](d), continued (2) IF the initial test specimen from a batch of waste fails to verify solidification, THEN provide for the collection and testing of representative test specimens from each consecutive batch of the same type of waste until at least 3 consecutive initial test specimens demonstrates solidification.
The process SHALL be modified as required to assure solidification of subsequent batches of waste.[2] Operation and maintenance of dewatering systems and equipment include the following: (a) Present and planned practice is to utilize plant personnel supplemented by vendor personnel or contracted vendor personnel, to operate AND maintain dewatering systems and equipment (as needed to meet disposal site requirements).(b) All disposal liners are manufactured by and purchased from QA-approved vendors.[3] ALARA considerations are addressed in all phases of the processes involving handling, packaging AND transfer of any type OR form of radioactive waste (dewatered or dry).Resin, charcoal media, spent filter cartridges AND sludges are typically processed within shields. Sluiceable demineralizers are shielded when in service. Radiation exposure and other health physics requirements are controlled by the issuance of a Radiation Work Permit (RWP) for each task.5.3. Waste Stream Sampling Methods and Frequency[1] The following general requirements apply to Plant waste stream sampling: (a) Treat each waste stream separately for classification purposes.(b) Ensure samples are representative of or can be correlated to the final waste form.(c) Determine the density for each new waste stream initially or as needed (not applicable for DAW and filters).(d) Perform an in-house analysis for gamma-emitting radionuclides for each sample sent to an independent laboratory.(e) Periodically perform in-house analysis for gamma emitting radionuclides for comparison to the current data base values for gamma emitters. (The current database is usually based on the most recent independent laboratory results.)(f) Resolve any discrepancies between in-house results AND the independent laboratory results for the same or replicate sample as soon as possible.(g) Maintain records of on-site and off-site waste stream sample analysis and evaluations.
5.3, continued[2] When required, waste stream samples should be analyzed, re-evaluated and if necessary, shipped to a vendor laboratory for additional analysis.
The same is true when there is a reason to believe that an equipment or process change has significantly altered the previously determined scaling factors by a factor of 10.Specific examples include but are not limited to:* Changes in oxidation reduction methods such as zinc, injection, hydrogen water chemistry,* Changes in purification methods including media specialization, media distribution, ion/cation ratios,* Changes in fuel performance criteria including fuel leaks" Other changes in reactor coolant chemistry.
- Sustained, unexplained, changes in the routinely monitored Beta/Alpha ratios, as determined by Radiation Protection,* When there is an extended reactor shutdown (> 90 days).* When there are changes to liquid waste processing, such as bypassing filters, utilizing filters or a change in ion exchange media.* When there are changes to the waste stream that could change the biogas generation rate.[3] The following requirements apply to infrequent or abnormal waste types: (a) Infrequent OR abnormal waste types that may be generated must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.(b) The RP Department Supervisor
/ Specialist responsible for processing AND shipping will determine if the waste can be correlated to an existing waste stream.(c) IF the radioactive waste cannot be correlated to an existing waste stream, THEN the RP Department Supervisor
/ Specialist responsible for processing and shipping SHALL determine specific off-site sampling and analysis requirements necessary to properly classify the material.[4] Specific sampling methods and data evaluation criteria are detailed in EN-RW-104 for specific waste streams.
5.4. Waste Classification
[1] General requirements for scaling factors include the following: (a) The Plant has established an inferential measurement program whereby concentrations of radionuclides which cannot be readily measured are estimated through ratio-ing with radionuclides which can be readily measured.(b) Scaling factor relationships are developed on a waste stream-specific basis.These relationships are periodically revised to reflect current independent lab data from direct measurement of samples. The scaling factor relationships currently used by the sites are as follows: " Hard to detect ACTIVATION product radionuclides and C-14 are estimated by using scaling factors with measured Co-60 activities.
- Hard to detect FISSION product radionuclides and H-3, Tc-99 and 1-129 are estimated by using scaling factors with measured Cs-1 37 activities.
- Hard to detect TRANSURANIC radionuclides are estimated by using scaling factors with measured Ce-144 activities.
Where Ce-144 cannot be readily measured, transuranics are estimated by using scaling factors with measured Cs-137 activities.
Second order scaling of transuranics is acceptable when Cs-137 and Ce-144 are not readily measurable.
[2] General requirements for the determination of total activity and radionuclide concentrations include the following: (a) The activity for the waste streams is estimated by using either Gross Radioactivity Measurement OR Direct Measurement of Radionuclides.
Current specific practices are as follows:* DAW -Gross radioactivity measurement in conjunction with the RADMAN computer codes, other approved computer codes or hand calculation.
- Filters -Gross radioactivity measurement in conjunction with the FILTRK computer code, other approved computer codes or hand calculation." All Other Waste Streams -Direct measurement of radionuclides in conjunction with the RADMAN computer codes, other approved computer codes or hand calculation.(b) Determination of the NRC waste classification is performed by comparing the measured or calculated concentrations of significant radionuclides in the final waste form to those listed in 10CFR Part 61.55.
5.5. Quality Control[1] The RADMAN computer code provides a mechanism to assist the Plant in conducting a quality control program in accordance with the waste classification requirements listed in 10CFR Part 61.55. All waste stream sample data changes are written to a computer data file for future review and reference.
[2] Audits and Management Review includes the following: (a) Appendix G to 10CFR20 requires conduct of a QC program which must include management review of audits.(b) Management audits of the Plant Sampling and Classification Program SHALL be periodically performed to verify the adequacy of maintenance sampling and analysis.(c) Audits and assessments are performed and documented by any of the following:
- Radiation Protection Department
- Quality Assurance Department
- Qualified Vendors (d) Certain elements of the Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual are applied to the Process Control Program. [QAPM, Section A.1.c]5.6. Dewaterina Operations
[1] Processing requirements during dewatering operations include the following: (a) All dewatering operations are performed per approved Plant or vendor operating procedures and instructions.(b) Dewatering limitations and capabilities are verified by vendor Topical Reports or Operating and Testing Procedures.
[2] Dewatered resin activity limitations include the following: (a) Dewatered resins will not be shipped off-site that have activities which will produce greater than 1.0E+8 rads total accumulated dose over 300 years. This is usually verified by comparing the container specific activity at the time of shipment to the following concentration limits for radionuclides with a half-life greater than five years:* 10 Ci (0.37 TBq) per cubic foot.* 350 uCi (12.95 MBq) per cubic centimeter 5.7. Waste Packaging Waste in final form will be packaged in accordance with Title 10 and Title 49 of the Code of federal regulations and in accordance with current burial site criteria as is detailed in EN-RW-102.
5.8. Administrative Controls[1] Information on solid radioactive waste shipped off-site is reported annually to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report as specified by the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) or Technical Specification.
[ANO1 Technical Specifications -5.6.3] [ANO2 Technical Specifications -6.6.3][WF3 Technical Specifications -6.9.18] [GGNS ODCM -5.6.3.c] [JAF Technical Specifications -5.6.3] [PLP ODCM, Appendix A -IV. A].[2] All changes to the PCP SHALL be documented.
All records of reviews performed SHALL be retained as required by the Quality Assurance Program. The documentation of the changes SHALL [GGNS UFSAR, Chapter 16B.1 /TRM -7.6.3.8 paragraph 2]: (a) Contain sufficient information to support the change with appropriate analyses or evaluations justifying the change.(b) Include a determination that the change will maintain the overall conformance of the solidified waste product (if applicable) to existing requirements of Federal, State or other applicable regulations.
[3] All changes in the Process Control Program and supporting documentation are included in each site's next Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[ANO ODCM -L3.2.1.C]
[VTY TRM 6.12][4] The changes to EN-RW-105 SHALL become effective upon review and acceptance by the site's General Plant Manager (equivalent title at Palisades is Plant Superintendent) except as listed below: (a) For Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, the changes to RW-105 SHALL be accomplished as specified in Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) Section 7.6.3.8. The changes SHALL become effective upon review and acceptance by the On-site Safety Review Committee (OSRC) and the approval of the GGNS Plant General Manager. [GGNS UFSAR, Chapter 166B.1 / TRM -7.6.3.8 paragraph 2]
- 5. 8[41, continued (b) For River Bend Nuclear Station, the procedure approval along with changes to RW-105 SHALL be accomplished per the River Bend Nuclear Station Technical Requirements, Section 5.5.14.1.
The changes SHALL become effective upon review and acceptance by approval from the River Bend Nuclear Station Plant Manager or Radiation Protection Manager. [RBS Technical Requirements
-5.5.14.1, 5.5.14.2 & 5.8.2](c) For Waterford 3, the procedure approval along with changes to RW-1 05 SHALL be accomplished per Waterford 3 Technical Specifications 6.13.2. The changes SHALL become effective upon review and acceptance by the Waterford 3 General Plant Manager. [WF3 Technical Specifications -6.13.2.b](d) For James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Station, the procedure approval along with changes to EN-RW-1 05 SHALL be accomplished per the James A. FitzPatrick Station Technical Specifications, Section 5.6.3. The changes SHALL become effective upon review and acceptance through approval from the James A.FitzPatrick Nuclear Station On-Site Safety Review Committee.
[JAF UFSAR, Chapter 11.3.5](e) For Vermont Yankee, Changes to the Process Control Program SHALL become effective after review and acceptance by the (OSRC) On-Site Safety Review Committee and the Site VP.(f) For IPEC, Changes to the Process Control Program SHALL become effective after final review and acceptance by the On-Site Safety Review Committee (OSRC).5.9. Vendor Requirements
[1] Vendors performing radwaste services under 10CFR61 and 10CFR71 requirements will be on the Entergy Qualified Supplier's List (QSL). [QAPM, Section A.1.c][2] Vendors performing radwaste services on-site are to comply with the following: (a) Dewatering and solidification services SHALL have a NRC-approved Topical Report or other form of certification documenting NRC approval of the processes and associated equipment/containers.(b) All vendor procedures utilized for performing on-site radwaste processing services (to assure compliance with 10 CFR Parts 20, 61 and 71, State Regulations, burial ground requirements, and other requirements governing the disposal of solid radioactive waste) will be reviewed per the requirements of EN-LI-100, technically by the applicable site's Radiation Protection organization and only be accepted per the approvals specified in Section 5.8 [4].
5.9[2], continued (c) All changes to vendor procedures for ongoing on-site radwaste services will be reviewed technically by the site's Radiation Protection organization and screened per the requirements of EN-LI-100.
Significant procedural changes will require the approvals specified in Section 5.8 [4]. During screening, the level of significance for procedural changes on equipment and process parameters may warrant the full 1 OCFR50.59 documentation and approval process.(d) Plant management SHALL review vendor(s) topical reports and test procedures per applicable requirements in Section 5.8.NOTE The PCP does not have to include the vendor's Topical Report if it has NRC approval, or has been previously submitted to the NRC.(e) Plant management review will assure that the vendors operations and requirements are compatible with the responsibilities and operation of the Plant.(f) Training requirements and records listed in Section 5.10 also apply to contracted vendors.5.10. Miscellaneous
[1] Special tools and equipment (a) Frequency of Use and Descriptions Required tools and equipment will vary depending on the specific process and waste container that is used. The various tools and equipment which may be required are detailed in specific procedures developed to govern activities described in this document.[2] Pre-requisites (a) Maintenance of Regulatory Material Ensure that a current set of DOT, NRC, EPA and applicable State regulations, vendor processing facility and disposal site regulations and requirements are maintained at the site and are readily available for reference.
The use of web based regulations is acceptable.
5.10[2], continued (b) Representative Radionuclide Sample Data Ensure that representative radionuclide sample data is on file for each active waste stream. Unless operation conditions or changes in processing methods require increased sample frequency, data is considered to be current if it meets the requirements of EN-RW-104.(c) Initial and Cyclic Training" A training program SHALL be developed, implemented and maintained for all personnel involved in processing, packaging, handling and transportation of radioactive waste to ensure radwaste operations are performed within the requirements of NRC Information Bulletin 79-19 and 49CFR Part 172.700 through Part 172.704.* Training requirements and documentation also apply to contracted on-site vendors.NOTE Cyclic training is defined as within three years for DOT, and two years for IATA (d) Specific employee training is required for each person who performs the following job functions
[1 72.702(b)].
- Classifies hazardous materials.
- Packages hazardous materials.
- Fills, loads and/or closes packages.* Marks and labels packages containing hazardous materials.
- Prepares shipping papers for hazardous materials.
- Offers or accepts hazardous materials for transportation.
- Handles hazardous materials.
- Marks or placards transport vehicles.* Operates transport vehicles." Works in a transportation facility and performs functions in proximity to hazardous materials which are to be transported.
- Inspects or tests packages.
5.10[2] continued (e) Cyclic training is defined as within three years for DOT & within two years for IATA.Copies of training records are required for as long as a person is employed and 90 days thereafter.
The records should include, as a minimum, the following:
- Trainee's name and signature" Training dates* Training material or source reference* Trainer's information 6.0 INTERFACES
[I] EN-LI-1 00, "Process Applicability Determination"[2] EN-RW-104, "Scaling Factors"[3] EN-QV-I 04, "Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual Control" 7.0 RECORDS[1] Documentation of pertinent data required to classify waste and verify solidification will be maintained on each batch of processed waste as required by approved procedures.
[2] Documentation will also be maintained to ensure that containers, shipping casks, and methods of packaging wastes meet applicable Federal regulations and disposal site criteria.
The records of reviews performed and documents associated with these reviews will be maintained as QA records.
8.0 SITE SPECIFIC COMMITMENTS Document Document NMM Procedure Site Applicability Section Section ANO ODCM L3.2.1.C 5.8 [3] ANO AN01 Technical Specifications 5.6.3 5.8 [1] ANO ANO2 Technical Specifications 6.6.3 5.8 [1] ANO RBS Technical Requirements 5.5.14
- RBS RBS Technical Requirements 5.5.14.1 5.8 [3] RBS 5.8 [4] (b)RBS Technical Requirements 5.5.14.2 5.8 [4] (b) RBS RBS Technical Requirements 5.8.2 5.8 [4] (b) RBS WF3 Technical Specifications 1.22
- WF3 WF3 Technical Specifications 6.9.18 5.8 [1] WF3 WF3 Technical Specifications 6.13.2.b 5.8 [4] (c) WF3 JAF ODCM 6.2.1 5.8 [1] JAF JAF Technical Specifications 5.6.3 5.8 [1], 5.8 [4] JAF JAF FSAR Chapters 7 and 5.8 [4] JAF 11 11759 -NRC IN 79-19 All
- WF3 GGNS UFSAR, Chapter 16B.1 / 7.6.3.8 1.0 GGNS TRM paragraph 1 GGNS ODCM 5.6.3.c 5.8 [1] GGNS GGNS FSAR 11.4.5.S2 5.9 [2](a) GGNS GGNS FSAR 11.4.2.3AS7 5.9 [2](a) GGNS IPN-99-079 All
- IPEC Appendix B Technical Section 4.5, Specifications RECS ODCM IPEC Part 1 PLP Technical Specifications 5.5.15 5.8 [4] PLP PLP ODCM Appendix A -5.8 [1] PLP IV. A NRC Letter 1.98.091 All
- PNPS NRC Letter 1.88.078 All
- All* Covered by directive as a whole or by various paragraphs of the directive.
9.0 ATTACHMENTS None