|
|
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | page count = 8 | | | page count = 8 |
| }} | | }} |
| {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-OpO1August 21, 1997NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 97-67: FAILURE TO SATISFY REQUIREMENTS FORSIGNIFICANT MANIPULATIONS OF THE CONTROLSFOR POWER REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSING | | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY |
| | |
| | COMMISSION |
| | |
| | ===OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION=== |
| | WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-OpO1 August 21, 1997 NRC INFORMATION |
| | |
| | NOTICE 97-67: FAILURE TO SATISFY REQUIREMENTS |
| | |
| | FOR SIGNIFICANT |
| | |
| | MANIPULATIONS |
| | |
| | OF THE CONTROLS FOR POWER REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSING |
|
| |
|
| ==Addressees== | | ==Addressees== |
| All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removedfrom the reactor vessel. | | All holders of operating |
| | |
| | licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have permanently |
| | |
| | ceased operations |
| | |
| | and have certified |
| | |
| | that fuel has been permanently |
| | |
| | removed from the reactor vessel. |
|
| |
|
| ==Purpose== | | ==Purpose== |
| The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alertaddressees that operator license applicants are required to perform at least five significantcontrol manipulations on the facility for which a license Is sought (Section 55.31 (a)(5) of Title10 of the Code of Federal Regulations [10 CFR 55.31(a)(5)]). Licensees have erred on theinterpretation of the requirements of this section of 10 CFR Part 55. It is expected thatrecipients will review information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, asappropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this informationnotice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response isrequired. | | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory |
| | |
| | Commission (NRC) is issuing this information |
| | |
| | notice to alert addressees |
| | |
| | that operator license applicants |
| | |
| | are required to perform at least five significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations |
| | |
| | on the facility for which a license Is sought (Section 55.31 (a)(5) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations |
| | |
| | [10 CFR 55.31(a)(5)]). |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | have erred on the interpretation |
| | |
| | of the requirements |
| | |
| | of this section of 10 CFR Part 55. It is expected that recipients |
| | |
| | will review information |
| | |
| | for applicability |
| | |
| | to their facilities |
| | |
| | and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. |
| | |
| | However, suggestions |
| | |
| | contained |
| | |
| | in this information |
| | |
| | notice are not NRC requirements; |
| | therefore, no specific action or written response is required.Description |
| | |
| | of Circumstances |
| | |
| | Operator license applicants |
| | |
| | are required to provide evidence that they, as trainees, have successfully |
| | |
| | manipulated |
| | |
| | the controls of the facility for which an operator or senior operator license is sought. At a minimum, applicants |
| | |
| | must perform five significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations |
| | |
| | which affect reactivity |
| | |
| | or power level on the facility for which the license is sought (10 CFR 55.31(a)(5)). |
| | |
| | Controls as defined in 10 CFR 55 are apparatus |
| | |
| | and mechanisms, the manipulation |
| | |
| | of which directly affects the reactivity |
| | |
| | or power level of the reactor. Licensees |
| | |
| | have erred on the interpretation |
| | |
| | of what constitutes |
| | |
| | a significant |
| | |
| | control manipulation. |
| | |
| | During a review of operator license applications |
| | |
| | for the Pilgrim facility, NRC inspectors |
| | |
| | determined |
| | |
| | that the requirements |
| | |
| | for operator and senior operator applicants |
| | |
| | to perform at least five significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations |
| | |
| | on the facility were not satisfied. |
| | |
| | The Pilgrim licensee incorrectly |
| | |
| | assumed that a single 30 percent decrease in power with recirculation |
| | |
| | pumps was equivalent |
| | |
| | to three 10 percent or greater power reductions |
| | |
| | and counted this as three of the five required significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations. |
| | |
| | The licensee contacted |
| | |
| | other licensees |
| | |
| | regarding |
| | |
| | the practice at their facilities |
| | |
| | and reported that there was a wide range of interpretations |
| | |
| | by the other licensees |
| | |
| | contacted. |
| | |
| | I I_pDp4 rceq -01 1101'2¢Q05020 Hills r, .'Y 4 IN 97-67 August 21, 1997 The NRC administered |
| | |
| | examinations |
| | |
| | to the individuals |
| | |
| | but did not issue operator licenses until the facility submitted |
| | |
| | revised applications |
| | |
| | and provided details of how the applicants |
| | |
| | satisfied |
| | |
| | the requirements |
| | |
| | to perform the required significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations. |
| | |
| | As documented |
| | |
| | in "Pilgrim Examination |
| | |
| | Report 50-293/97-006 and Notice of Violation," (Accession |
| | |
| | No. 9707290261), dated July 18, 1997, the NRC determined |
| | |
| | that a violation |
| | |
| | of NRC requirements |
| | |
| | had occurred because two applicants |
| | |
| | had not completed |
| | |
| | the five significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations |
| | |
| | required by 10 CFR 55.31 (a)(5) in an acceptable |
| | |
| | manner.Discussion |
| | |
| | Before 1987, the operator license application |
| | |
| | required the licensee to certify that the applicant |
| | |
| | had learned to operate the facility and also to provide the details of the training and experience |
| | |
| | of the applicant. |
| | |
| | A 1987 NRC rule changed the requirement |
| | |
| | to provide the details of the applicant's |
| | |
| | training and experience |
| | |
| | and requested |
| | |
| | instead a simple check mark in the boxes on the application |
| | |
| | form (NRC-398) |
| | to indicate that the applicant |
| | |
| | has successfully |
| | |
| | completed |
| | |
| | an Institute |
| | |
| | of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) accredited |
| | |
| | operator training program that is based on a systems approach to training, and that a certified |
| | |
| | simulation |
| | |
| | facility is used in the operator training program.During rule making, the nuclear industry requested |
| | |
| | clarification |
| | |
| | of the phrase "leamed to operate" (Federal Register Vol. 52, No. 57 Wednesday, March 25, 1987, page 9456) and NRC added 10 CFR 55.31 (a)(5) to specify the minimum number of control manipulations |
| | |
| | that the applicant |
| | |
| | had to conduct on the facility.Examples of significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations |
| | |
| | are contained |
| | |
| | In Regulatory |
| | |
| | Guide (RG) 1.8, Revision 2, "Qualification |
| | |
| | and Training of Personnel |
| | |
| | for Nuclear Power Plants." Paragraph |
| | |
| | C.1.h. of RG 1.8 states in part that: Control room operating |
| | |
| | experience |
| | |
| | ...should include manipulation |
| | |
| | of controls of the facility during a minimum of five reactivity |
| | |
| | changes. Every effort should be made to have a diversity |
| | |
| | of reactivity |
| | |
| | changes for each applicant. |
| | |
| | Startups, shutdowns, large load changes, and changes in rod programming |
| | |
| | are some examples and could be accomplished |
| | |
| | by manually using such systems as rod control, chemical shim control, or recirculation |
| | |
| | flow.Additional |
| | |
| | examples of significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations |
| | |
| | include, but are not limited to, items A-F of 10 CFR 55.59(c)(3) (on-thejob |
| | |
| | training for requalification): |
| | IN 97-67 August 21, 1997 A. Plant or reactor startups to include a range that reactivity |
| | |
| | feedback from nuclear heat addition is noticeable |
| | |
| | and heatup rate is established. |
| | |
| | B. Plant shutdown.C. Manual control of steam generators |
| | |
| | or feedwater |
| | |
| | or both during startup and shutdown.D. Boration or dilution during power operation. |
| | |
| | E. Significant ( 10 percent) power changes in manual control or recirculation |
| | |
| | flow.F. Reactor power change of 10 percent or greater where load change is performed |
| | |
| | with load limit control or where flux, temperature, or speed control is on manual (for HTGR).As defined in 10 CFR 55.59(c)(3)(E), a 10 percent or greater power change is considered |
| | |
| | to be a significant |
| | |
| | control manipulation. |
| | |
| | Additional |
| | |
| | clarification |
| | |
| | was provided in NUREG-1262,"Answers to Questions |
| | |
| | at Public Meetings Regarding |
| | |
| | Implementation |
| | |
| | of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 55 on Operators' |
| | Licenses," dated November 1987, which was transmitted |
| | |
| | to all licensees |
| | |
| | on November 12, 1987, as an attachment |
| | |
| | to Generic Letter 87-16 (Accession |
| | |
| | No. 8712030029). |
| | |
| | Some of the guidance included in NUREG 1262 is reiterated |
| | |
| | below; licensees |
| | |
| | should refer to NUREG 1262 for additional |
| | |
| | details.The situation |
| | |
| | in which an applicant |
| | |
| | performs a 30 percent change in power in a short period (i.e., on the same shift) with no diversity |
| | |
| | of controls would be evaluated |
| | |
| | as one significant |
| | |
| | control manipulation. |
| | |
| | The situation |
| | |
| | in which an applicant |
| | |
| | reduces power from 100 percent to 95 percent and then increases |
| | |
| | power from 95 percent to 100 percent would be evaluated |
| | |
| | as one significant |
| | |
| | control manipulation. |
| | |
| | The situation |
| | |
| | when an applicant |
| | |
| | performs a 50 percent change in power in a short period of time with diversity |
| | |
| | of controls (recirculation |
| | |
| | flow and control rods, or chemical shim and controls rods) can be evaluated |
| | |
| | as two significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations. |
| | |
| | The situations |
| | |
| | when an applicant |
| | |
| | reduces power by 10 percent then holds there for performance |
| | |
| | of other work or testing and then later in the shift increases |
| | |
| | power by 10 percent can be evaluated |
| | |
| | as two significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations. |
| | |
| | Diversity |
| | |
| | of significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations |
| | |
| | on the plant are expected; |
| | however, it is not required. |
| | |
| | If the applicant |
| | |
| | does not have experience |
| | |
| | in diverse significant |
| | |
| | control manipulations, this fact should be noted in the comments section of NRC form 398. |
| | |
| | .I IN 97-67 August 21, 1997 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please contact one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Maryle on, Fiting Director Division of Reactor Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: Brian Hughes, NRR 301-415-1096 E-mail: bxhl@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | John Pellet, RIV (817) 860-8159 E-mail: jlp@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Donald Florek, RI (610) 337-5185 E-mail: djfl@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Thomas Peebles, RII (404) 562-4638 E-mail: tap@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Mel Leach, Rill (630) 829-9705 E-mail: mnl@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachment: |
| | List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices ,5 A ge Tech Editor has reveiwed and concurred |
| | |
| | on 7/8/97 DOCUMENT NAME: G:ICDPIN95X7A.BXH |
| | |
| | *See previous concurrence |
| | |
| | To receive a copy of this document. |
| | |
| | hIdlcate hI the box: C -Copy without ettachment/enclosure |
| | |
| | 'E -Copy with attachmentfenclosure |
| | |
| | 'N' -No copy OFFICE HOLB/DRCH |
| | |
| | I HOLB/DRCH |
| | |
| | I PECB [__ PECB/NRR NAME BHughes:rc/bh |
| | |
| | RGallo Cpetrone AChaffee G us{DATE 08/06/97* |
| | 08/07/97* |
| | 08/14/97* |
| | 08/14/97* |
| | 0819797 lOFFICIAL |
| | |
| | RECORD COPY |
| | |
| | I -Attachment |
| | |
| | IN 97-66 August 20, 1997 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED NRC INFORMATION |
| | |
| | NOTICES Information |
| | |
| | Date of Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to 97-66 Failures to Provide 08/20/97 All holders of oDeratir ia licenses Special Lenses for Operators |
| | |
| | Using Respirator |
| | |
| | or Self-Contained |
| | |
| | Breathing Apparatus |
| | |
| | During Emergency |
| | |
| | Operations |
| | |
| | or construction |
| | |
| | permits for nuclear power and non-power reactors and all licensed reactor operators |
| | |
| | and senior operators 97-65 Failures of High-Dose- Rate (HDR) Remote After-loading Device Source Guide Tubes, Catheters, and Applicators |
| | |
| | 08/15/97 All high-dose-rate (HDR)remote afterloader |
| | |
| | licensees 97-64 97-63 97-62 97-61 Potential |
| | |
| | Problems Associated |
| | |
| | with Loss of Electrical |
| | |
| | ===Power in Certain Teletherapy=== |
| | Units Status of NRC Staff's Review of BWRVIP-05 Unrecognized |
| | |
| | Reactivity |
| | |
| | Addition During Plant Shutdown U.S. Department |
| | |
| | of Health and Human Services Letter, to Medical Device Manu-facturers, on the Year 2000 Problem 08/13/97 08/07/97 08/06/97 08/06/97 All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory |
| | |
| | Commission |
| | |
| | medical tele-therapy licensees All holders of OLs or CPs for boiling water reactors All holders of OLs or CPs*for nuclear power reactors All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory |
| | |
| | Commission |
| | |
| | medical licensees, veterinarians, and manu-facturers/distributors |
| | |
| | of medical devices OL = Operating |
| | |
| | License CP = Construction |
| | |
| | Permit |
| | |
| | IN 97-XX August XX, 1997 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please contact one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Dir ctor Division of Reactor ProgramWianagement |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor egulation Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: |
| | Brian Hughes, NRR John Pellet, RIV 301-415-1096 |
| | (817) 860-8159 E-mail: bxhl@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | E-mail: jlp@nrc. v Donald Florek, RI Thomas P les, RI1 (610) 337-1585 (404) 56 638 E-mail: djfl@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | E-mailf pnrc.gov Mel Leach, Rill (630) 829-9705 E-mail: mnl@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachment: |
| | List of Recently Issued N Information |
| | |
| | Notices DOCUMENT NAME: G:1CDP1lN9pX7A.BXH |
| | |
| | *See previous concurrence |
| | |
| | /To receive a copy of this document. |
| | |
| | Indicate hI the box: *C -Copy without attachmentlenclosure |
| | |
| | E -Copy with attachment/enclosure |
| | |
| | N' -No copy 4 A OFFICE HOLB/DRCH |
| | |
| | ' HOLB/DRCH |
| | |
| | PEC &NAME BHughes:rc/bh |
| | |
| | RGallo Cpet'rone |
| | |
| | kc-hafftee |
| | |
| | DATE 08/06/97*, 08/07/97* |
| | 08/)cf/97 |
| | 08/ #( /97 (A) DRPM 11slosson 08/ /97 UV-VILIAL |
| | |
| | KtLUUV LUFY'y9'Y% 1V I |
| | |
| | IN 97-XX July XX. 1997 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response.you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice. please c act (one of) the technical |
| | |
| | contact(s) |
| | listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | ice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Jack Roe. Acting rector Division of Rea or Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office of Nuc ar Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contact(s): |
| | Brian Hughes. NRR/HOL (301) 415-1096 E-Mail: BXH1@NRC. |
| | |
| | V Donald Florek, egion I Thomas Peebles. Region II (610) 337-158 (404) 562-4638 E-Mail: DJ @NRC.GOV E-Mail: TAP@NRC.GOV |
| | |
| | Mel Leac .Region III John Pellet. Region IV (630) 29-9705 (817) 860-8159 E-Mai. MNL@NRC.GOV |
| | |
| | E-Mail: JLP@NRC.GOV |
| | |
| | Attachment: |
| | List of Recen y Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices*See previous concurrence |
| | |
| | To receive a copy of this document. |
| | |
| | Indlicate |
| | |
| | In the bo C -Copy without attachment/enclosure |
| | |
| | E -Copy with attachment/enclosure |
| | |
| | 'N' -No copy OFFICE HOLB/DRCH |
| | |
| | TECH/EDITOR |
| | |
| | l PECB/NRR DRPM/NRR NAME BHughes:rc/bht. |
| | |
| | RGallo'f DCalureA d AChaffee JRoe DATE 08/06/97* |
| | 08 /97 07/08/97* |
| | 08/ /97 08/ /97 I ..INFORMATION |
| | |
| | NOTICE FORMAT This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written res onse. If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please ntact (one of)the technical |
| | |
| | contact(s) |
| | listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Marylee M. osson, Director Division Reactor Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office Nuclear Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contact(s): |
| | Brian ghes, NRR/HOLB 301- 5-1096 E- 11: BXH1@NRC.GOV |
| | |
| | onald Florek, Region I Thomas Peebles, Region II 610-337-1585 |
| | 404-562-4638 E-Mail: DJF1@NRC.GOV |
| | |
| | E-Mail: TAP@NRC.GOV |
| | |
| | Mel Leach, Region III John Pellet. Region IV--- --- ----eS no o a 63U-829-9/Ub |
| | |
| | E-Mail: MNL@NRC.GOV |
| | |
| | E/-MaJU-iJb |
| | |
| | G E-Mail: JLP@NRC.GOV |
| | |
| | Attachment: |
| | List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices To receive a copy of this document, hIdicate hi the box: 'C -Copy without attachmentlenclosure |
| | |
| | WE' -Copy with attachment/enclosure |
| | |
| | 'N" -No copy OFFICE HOLB/DRCH |
| | |
| | I HOLB/DRCH |
|
| |
|
| ==Description of Circumstances==
| | I TECH/EDITOR |
| Operator license applicants are required to provide evidence that they, as trainees, havesuccessfully manipulated the controls of the facility for which an operator or senior operatorlicense is sought. At a minimum, applicants must perform five significant controlmanipulations which affect reactivity or power level on the facility for which the license issought (10 CFR 55.31(a)(5)). Controls as defined in 10 CFR 55 are apparatus andmechanisms, the manipulation of which directly affects the reactivity or power level of thereactor. Licensees have erred on the interpretation of what constitutes a significant controlmanipulation.During a review of operator license applications for the Pilgrim facility, NRC inspectorsdetermined that the requirements for operator and senior operator applicants to perform atleast five significant control manipulations on the facility were not satisfied. The Pilgrimlicensee incorrectly assumed that a single 30 percent decrease in power with recirculationpumps was equivalent to three 10 percent or greater power reductions and counted this asthree of the five required significant control manipulations. The licensee contacted otherlicensees regarding the practice at their facilities and reported that there was a wide range ofinterpretations by the other licensees contacted. I I_pDp4 rceq -01 1101'2¢Q05020Hills r, .'Y 4 IN 97-67August 21, 1997 The NRC administered examinations to the individuals but did not issue operator licensesuntil the facility submitted revised applications and provided details of how the applicantssatisfied the requirements to perform the required significant control manipulations. Asdocumented in "Pilgrim Examination Report 50-293/97-006 and Notice of Violation,"(Accession No. 9707290261), dated July 18, 1997, the NRC determined that a violation ofNRC requirements had occurred because two applicants had not completed the fivesignificant control manipulations required by 10 CFR 55.31 (a)(5) in an acceptable manner.DiscussionBefore 1987, the operator license application required the licensee to certify that theapplicant had learned to operate the facility and also to provide the details of the training andexperience of the applicant. A 1987 NRC rule changed the requirement to provide the detailsof the applicant's training and experience and requested instead a simple check mark in theboxes on the application form (NRC-398) to indicate that the applicant has successfullycompleted an Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) accredited operator trainingprogram that is based on a systems approach to training, and that a certified simulationfacility is used in the operator training program.During rule making, the nuclear industry requested clarification of the phrase "leamed tooperate" (Federal Register Vol. 52, No. 57 Wednesday, March 25, 1987, page 9456) andNRC added 10 CFR 55.31 (a)(5) to specify the minimum number of control manipulations thatthe applicant had to conduct on the facility.Examples of significant control manipulations are contained In Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.8,Revision 2, "Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants."Paragraph C.1.h. of RG 1.8 states in part that:Control room operating experience ...should include manipulation of controls of thefacility during a minimum of five reactivity changes. Every effort should be made tohave a diversity of reactivity changes for each applicant. Startups, shutdowns, largeload changes, and changes in rod programming are some examples and could beaccomplished by manually using such systems as rod control, chemical shim control,or recirculation flow.Additional examples of significant control manipulations include, but are not limited to, itemsA-F of 10 CFR 55.59(c)(3) (on-thejob training for requalification):
| |
| IN 97-67August 21, 1997 A. Plant or reactor startups to include a range that reactivityfeedback from nuclear heat addition is noticeable and heatuprate is established.B. Plant shutdown.C. Manual control of steam generators or feedwater or both during startupand shutdown.D. Boration or dilution during power operation.E. Significant ( 10 percent) power changes in manual control or recirculationflow.F. Reactor power change of 10 percent or greater where load change isperformed with load limit control or where flux, temperature, or speed control ison manual (for HTGR).As defined in 10 CFR 55.59(c)(3)(E), a 10 percent or greater power change is considered tobe a significant control manipulation. Additional clarification was provided in NUREG-1262,"Answers to Questions at Public Meetings Regarding Implementation of Title 10, Code ofFederal Regulations, Part 55 on Operators' Licenses," dated November 1987, which wastransmitted to all licensees on November 12, 1987, as an attachment to Generic Letter 87-16(Accession No. 8712030029). Some of the guidance included in NUREG 1262 is reiteratedbelow; licensees should refer to NUREG 1262 for additional details.The situation in which an applicant performs a 30 percent change in power in a shortperiod (i.e., on the same shift) with no diversity of controls would be evaluated as onesignificant control manipulation. The situation in which an applicant reduces powerfrom 100 percent to 95 percent and then increases power from 95 percent to100 percent would be evaluated as one significant control manipulation.The situation when an applicant performs a 50 percent change in power in a shortperiod of time with diversity of controls (recirculation flow and control rods, orchemical shim and controls rods) can be evaluated as two significant controlmanipulations. The situations when an applicant reduces power by 10 percent thenholds there for performance of other work or testing and then later in the shiftincreases power by 10 percent can be evaluated as two significant controlmanipulations.Diversity of significant control manipulations on the plant are expected; however, it isnot required. If the applicant does not have experience in diverse significant controlmanipulations, this fact should be noted in the comments section of NRC form 398.
| |
|
| |
|
| .IIN 97-67August 21, 1997 I -AttachmentIN 97-66August 20, 1997 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICESInformation Date ofNotice No. Subject Issuance Issued to97-66 Failures to Provide 08/20/97 All holders of oDeratiria licensesSpecial Lenses forOperators UsingRespirator or Self-Contained BreathingApparatus DuringEmergency Operationsor construction permits fornuclear power and non-powerreactors and all licensed reactoroperators and senior operators97-65Failures of High-Dose-Rate (HDR) Remote After-loading Device SourceGuide Tubes, Catheters,and Applicators08/15/97All high-dose-rate (HDR)remote afterloader licensees97-6497-6397-6297-61Potential ProblemsAssociated with Lossof Electrical Powerin Certain TeletherapyUnitsStatus of NRC Staff'sReview of BWRVIP-05Unrecognized ReactivityAddition During PlantShutdownU.S. Department ofHealth and HumanServices Letter, toMedical Device Manu-facturers, on theYear 2000 Problem08/13/9708/07/9708/06/9708/06/97All U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission medical tele-therapy licenseesAll holders of OLs or CPsfor boiling water reactorsAll holders of OLs or CPs*for nuclear power reactorsAll U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission medical licensees,veterinarians, and manu-facturers/distributors ofmedical devicesOL = Operating LicenseCP = Construction Permit
| | I PECB/NRR I DRPM/NRR l l INAME BHughes:rc/bh |
|
| |
|
| IN 97-XXAugust XX, 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have anyquestions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contactslisted below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Dir ctorDivision of Reactor ProgramWianagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor egulationTechnical contacts: Brian Hughes, NRR John Pellet, RIV301-415-1096 (817) 860-8159E-mail: bxhl@nrc.gov E-mail: jlp@nrc. vDonald Florek, RI Thomas P les, RI1(610) 337-1585 (404) 56 638E-mail: djfl@nrc.gov E-mailf pnrc.govMel Leach, Rill(630) 829-9705E-mail: mnl@nrc.govAttachment: List of Recently Issued N Information NoticesDOCUMENT NAME: G:1CDP1lN9pX7A.BXH*See previous concurrence /To receive a copy of this document. Indicate hI the box: *C -Copy without attachmentlenclosure E -Copy with attachment/enclosureN' -No copy 4 AOFFICE HOLB/DRCH ' HOLB/DRCH PEC &NAME BHughes:rc/bh RGallo Cpet'rone kc-haffteeDATE 08/06/97*, 08/07/97* 08/)cf/97 08/ #( /97(A) DRPM11slosson08/ /97UV-VILIAL KtLUUV LUFY'y9'Y% 1VI
| | RGallo DCalure4UPP |
|
| |
|
| IN 97-XXJuly XX. 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response.you have any questions about the information in this notice. please c act(one of) the technical contact(s) listed below or the appropriate ice ofNuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Jack Roe. Acting rectorDivision of Rea or Program ManagementOffice of Nuc ar Reactor RegulationTechnical contact(s): Brian Hughes. NRR/HOL(301) 415-1096E-Mail: BXH1@NRC. VDonald Florek, egion I Thomas Peebles. Region II(610) 337-158 (404) 562-4638E-Mail: DJ @NRC.GOV E-Mail: TAP@NRC.GOVMel Leac .Region III John Pellet. Region IV(630) 29-9705 (817) 860-8159E-Mai. MNL@NRC.GOV E-Mail: JLP@NRC.GOVAttachment: List of Recen y Issued NRC Information Notices*See previous concurrenceTo receive a copy of this document. Indlicate In the bo C -Copy without attachment/enclosure E -Copy with attachment/enclosure 'N' -No copyOFFICE HOLB/DRCH TECH/EDITOR l PECB/NRR DRPM/NRRNAME BHughes:rc/bht. RGallo'f DCalureA d AChaffee JRoeDATE 08/06/97* 08 /97 07/08/97* 08/ /97 08/ /97 I ..INFORMATION NOTICE FORMATThis information notice requires no specific action or written res onse. If youhave any questions about the information in this notice, please ntact (one of)the technical contact(s) listed below or the appropriate fice of NuclearReactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Marylee M. osson, DirectorDivision Reactor Program ManagementOffice Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contact(s): Brian ghes, NRR/HOLB301- 5-1096E- 11: BXH1@NRC.GOVonald Florek, Region I Thomas Peebles, Region II610-337-1585 404-562-4638E-Mail: DJF1@NRC.GOV E-Mail: TAP@NRC.GOVMel Leach, Region III John Pellet. Region IV--- --- ----eS no o a63U-829-9/UbE-Mail: MNL@NRC.GOVE/-MaJU-iJb GE-Mail: JLP@NRC.GOVAttachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesTo receive a copy of this document, hIdicate hi the box: 'C -Copy without attachmentlenclosure WE' -Copy with attachment/enclosure 'N" -No copyOFFICE HOLB/DRCH I HOLB/DRCH I TECH/EDITOR I PECB/NRR I DRPM/NRR l lINAME BHughes:rc/bh RGallo DCalure4UPP AChaffee MSlossonDATE 08/6 /97 08/ /97 08/ /97 08/ /97 07/ /97OFFICIAL RECORD COPYIssue Date: 03/21/94E20-50720, Exhibit 20
| | AChaffee MSlosson DATE 08/6 /97 08/ /97 08/ /97 08/ /97 07/ /97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Issue Date: 03/21/94 E20-5 0720, Exhibit 20}} |
| }} | |
|
| |
|
| {{Information notice-Nav}} | | {{Information notice-Nav}} |
Failure to Satisfy Requirements for Significant Manipulations of the Controls for Power Reactor Operation LicensingML031050127 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant |
---|
Issue date: |
08/21/1997 |
---|
From: |
Slosson M M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
---|
To: |
|
---|
References |
---|
IN-97-067, NUDOCS 9708150270 |
Download: ML031050127 (8) |
|
Similar Documents at Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant |
---|
Category:NRC Information Notice
MONTHYEARInformation Notice 2020-02, Flex Diesel Generator Operational Challenges2020-09-15015 September 2020 Flex Diesel Generator Operational Challenges ML20225A0322020-09-0303 September 2020 NRC Choice Letter to NAC International with Attached Safety Inspection Report, IR 0721015/2020201, February 24-27, 2020 and July 22, 2020, Inspection of NAC International in Norcross, Georgia Information Notice 2012-09, PWROG-16043-NP-A, Revision 2, PWROG Program to Address NRC Information Notice 2012-09: Irradiation Effects on Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Crush Strength for Westinghouse and CE PWR Fuel Designs.2019-11-30030 November 2019 PWROG-16043-NP-A, Revision 2, PWROG Program to Address NRC Information Notice 2012-09: Irradiation Effects on Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Crush Strength for Westinghouse and CE PWR Fuel Designs. Information Notice 2011-20, NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011)2019-07-24024 July 2019 NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011) ML19196A2452019-07-15015 July 2019 Public Notice - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - Exigent Amendment to Facility Operating License Information Notice 2019-01, Inadequate Evaluation of Temporary Alterations2019-03-12012 March 2019 Inadequate Evaluation of Temporary Alterations ML16028A3082016-04-27027 April 2016 NRC Information Notice; IN 2016-05: Operating Experience Regarding Complications From a Loss of Instrumentation Air Information Notice 2015-05, Inoperability of Auxiliary and Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits on Loss of Main Feedwater Pumps2015-05-12012 May 2015 Inoperability of Auxiliary and Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits on Loss of Main Feedwater Pumps Information Notice 2015-05, Inoperability Of Auxiliary And Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits On Loss Of Main Feedwater Pumps2015-05-12012 May 2015 Inoperability Of Auxiliary And Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits On Loss Of Main Feedwater Pumps Information Notice 2013-20, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143)2013-10-0303 October 2013 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143) Information Notice 2013-20, Official Exhibit - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143)2013-10-0303 October 2013 Official Exhibit - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143) Information Notice 2013-11, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013)2013-07-0303 July 2013 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013) Information Notice 2013-11, Official Exhibit - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013)2013-07-0303 July 2013 Official Exhibit - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013) Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Contain2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Con2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notic2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2012-13, Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs and Corrective Actions in the Spent Fuel Pool2012-08-10010 August 2012 Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs and Corrective Actions in the Spent Fuel Pool Information Notice 2012-13, Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs And Corrective Actions In The Spent Fuel Pool2012-08-10010 August 2012 Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs And Corrective Actions In The Spent Fuel Pool Information Notice 2012-11, Age Related Capacitor Degradation2012-07-23023 July 2012 Age Related Capacitor Degradation ML12031A0132012-02-0606 February 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Investigation Report No. 2-2010-058, Cpn International, Inc Information Notice 2011-19, Licensee Event Reports Containing Information Pertaining to Defects to Basic Components2011-09-26026 September 2011 Licensee Event Reports Containing Information Pertaining to Defects to Basic Components Information Notice 2011-15, Steel Containment Degradation and Associated License Renewal Aging Management Issues2011-08-0101 August 2011 Steel Containment Degradation and Associated License Renewal Aging Management Issues Information Notice 2011-17, Calculation Methodologies for Operability Determinations of Gas Voids in Nuclear Power Plant Piping2011-07-26026 July 2011 Calculation Methodologies for Operability Determinations of Gas Voids in Nuclear Power Plant Piping Information Notice 2011-13, Official Exhibit - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 Official Exhibit - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-13, Official Exhibit - Nys000329-00-Bd01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (Nrc in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 Official Exhibit - Nys000329-00-Bd01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (Nrc in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-13, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-04, IN: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 IN: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2011-04, In: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 In: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2011-04, in: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 in: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2010-26, New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-2010-12-30030 December 2010 New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 Information Notice 2010-26, New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review2010-12-30030 December 2010 New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 Information Notice 2010-26, 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-262010-12-21021 December 2010 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 ML13066A1872009-12-16016 December 2009 Draft NRC Information Notice 2009-xx - Underestimate of Dam Failure Frequency Used in Probabilistic Risk Assessments ML1007804482009-11-23023 November 2009 Email from Peter Bamford, NRR to Pamela Cowan, Exelon on TMI Contamination Control Event Information Notice 2009-11, NSP000059-Revised Prefiled Testimony of Northard/Petersen/Peterson-NRC Information Notice 2009-112009-07-0707 July 2009 NSP000059-Revised Prefiled Testimony of Northard/Petersen/Peterson-NRC Information Notice 2009-11 Information Notice 2009-10, Official Exhibit - NYS000019-00-BD01- NRC Information Notice 2009-10, Transformers Failures - Recent Operating Experience (Jul. 7, 2009) (NRC in 2009-10)2009-07-0707 July 2009 Official Exhibit - NYS000019-00-BD01- NRC Information Notice 2009-10, Transformers Failures - Recent Operating Experience (Jul. 7, 2009) (NRC in 2009-10) Information Notice 2009-09, Improper Flow Controller Settings Renders Injection Systems Inoperable and Surveillance Did Not Identify2009-06-19019 June 2009 Improper Flow Controller Settings Renders Injection Systems Inoperable and Surveillance Did Not Identify Information Notice 2008-12, Reactor Trip Due to Off-Site Power Fluctuation2008-07-0707 July 2008 Reactor Trip Due to Off-Site Power Fluctuation Information Notice 2008-11, Service Water System Degradation at Brunswicksteam Electric Plant Unit 12008-06-18018 June 2008 Service Water System Degradation at Brunswicksteam Electric Plant Unit 1 Information Notice 2008-04, Counterfeit Parts Supplied to Nuclear Power Plants2008-04-0707 April 2008 Counterfeit Parts Supplied to Nuclear Power Plants Information Notice 1991-09, Counterfeiting of Crane Valves2007-09-25025 September 2007 Counterfeiting of Crane Valves Information Notice 2007-28, Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Due to Inadequate Chemistry Controls2007-09-19019 September 2007 Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Due to Inadequate Chemistry Controls Information Notice 2007-29, Temporary Scaffolding Affects Operability of Safety-Related Equipment2007-09-17017 September 2007 Temporary Scaffolding Affects Operability of Safety-Related Equipment Information Notice 2007-14, Loss of Offsite Power and Dual-Unit Trip at Catawba Nuclear Generating Station2007-03-30030 March 2007 Loss of Offsite Power and Dual-Unit Trip at Catawba Nuclear Generating Station Information Notice 2007-06, Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems2007-02-0909 February 2007 Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Information Notice 2007-05, Vertical Deep Draft Pump Shaft and Coupling Failures2007-02-0909 February 2007 Vertical Deep Draft Pump Shaft and Coupling Failures Information Notice 2006-31, Inadequate Fault Interrupting Rating of Breakers2006-12-26026 December 2006 Inadequate Fault Interrupting Rating of Breakers Information Notice 2006-29, Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves as a Result of Stem Nut Wear2006-12-14014 December 2006 Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves as a Result of Stem Nut Wear Information Notice 2006-29, Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves As a Result of Stem Nut Wear2006-12-14014 December 2006 Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves As a Result of Stem Nut Wear Information Notice 2006-13, E-mail from M. Mclaughlin on NRC, Regarding NRC Information Notice 2006-13: Groundwater Contamination2006-07-13013 July 2006 E-mail from M. Mclaughlin on NRC, Regarding NRC Information Notice 2006-13: Groundwater Contamination 2020-09-03 The following query condition could not be considered due to this wiki's restrictions on query size or depth: <code> [[:Beaver Valley]] OR [[:Millstone]] OR [[:Hatch]] OR [[:Monticello]] OR [[:Calvert Cliffs]] OR [[:Dresden]] OR [[:Davis Besse]] OR [[:Peach Bottom]] OR [[:Browns Ferry]] OR [[:Salem]] OR [[:Oconee]] OR [[:Mcguire]] OR [[:Nine Mile Point]] OR [[:Palisades]] OR [[:Palo Verde]] OR [[:Perry]] OR [[:Indian Point]] OR [[:Fermi]] OR [[:Kewaunee]] OR [[:Catawba]] OR [[:Harris]] OR [[:Wolf Creek]] OR [[:Saint Lucie]] OR [[:Point Beach]] OR [[:Oyster Creek]] OR [[:Watts Bar]] OR [[:Hope Creek]] OR [[:Grand Gulf]] OR [[:Cooper]] OR [[:Sequoyah]] OR [[:Byron]] OR [[:Pilgrim]] OR [[:Arkansas Nuclear]] OR [[:Three Mile Island]] OR [[:Braidwood]] OR [[:Susquehanna]] OR [[:Summer]] OR [[:Prairie Island]] OR [[:Columbia]] OR [[:Seabrook]] OR [[:Brunswick]] OR [[:Surry]] OR [[:Limerick]] OR [[:North Anna]] OR [[:Turkey Point]] OR [[:River Bend]] OR [[:Vermont Yankee]] OR [[:Crystal River]] OR [[:Haddam Neck]] OR [[:Ginna]] OR [[:Diablo Canyon]] OR [[:Callaway]] OR [[:Vogtle]] OR [[:Waterford]] OR [[:Duane Arnold]] OR [[:Farley]] OR [[:Robinson]] OR [[:Clinton]] OR [[:South Texas]] OR [[:San Onofre]] OR [[:Cook]] OR [[:Comanche Peak]] OR [[:Yankee Rowe]] OR [[:Maine Yankee]] OR [[:Quad Cities]] OR [[:Humboldt Bay]] OR [[:La Crosse]] OR [[:Big Rock Point]] OR [[:Rancho Seco]] OR [[:Zion]] OR [[:Midland]] OR [[:Bellefonte]] OR [[:Fort Calhoun]] OR [[:FitzPatrick]] OR [[:McGuire]] OR [[:LaSalle]] OR [[:Fort Saint Vrain]] OR [[:Shoreham]] OR [[:Satsop]] OR [[:Trojan]] OR [[:Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant]] </code>.
[Table view]The following query condition could not be considered due to this wiki's restrictions on query size or depth: <code> [[:Beaver Valley]] OR [[:Millstone]] OR [[:Hatch]] OR [[:Monticello]] OR [[:Calvert Cliffs]] OR [[:Dresden]] OR [[:Davis Besse]] OR [[:Peach Bottom]] OR [[:Browns Ferry]] OR [[:Salem]] OR [[:Oconee]] OR [[:Mcguire]] OR [[:Nine Mile Point]] OR [[:Palisades]] OR [[:Palo Verde]] OR [[:Perry]] OR [[:Indian Point]] OR [[:Fermi]] OR [[:Kewaunee]] OR [[:Catawba]] OR [[:Harris]] OR [[:Wolf Creek]] OR [[:Saint Lucie]] OR [[:Point Beach]] OR [[:Oyster Creek]] OR [[:Watts Bar]] OR [[:Hope Creek]] OR [[:Grand Gulf]] OR [[:Cooper]] OR [[:Sequoyah]] OR [[:Byron]] OR [[:Pilgrim]] OR [[:Arkansas Nuclear]] OR [[:Three Mile Island]] OR [[:Braidwood]] OR [[:Susquehanna]] OR [[:Summer]] OR [[:Prairie Island]] OR [[:Columbia]] OR [[:Seabrook]] OR [[:Brunswick]] OR [[:Surry]] OR [[:Limerick]] OR [[:North Anna]] OR [[:Turkey Point]] OR [[:River Bend]] OR [[:Vermont Yankee]] OR [[:Crystal River]] OR [[:Haddam Neck]] OR [[:Ginna]] OR [[:Diablo Canyon]] OR [[:Callaway]] OR [[:Vogtle]] OR [[:Waterford]] OR [[:Duane Arnold]] OR [[:Farley]] OR [[:Robinson]] OR [[:Clinton]] OR [[:South Texas]] OR [[:San Onofre]] OR [[:Cook]] OR [[:Comanche Peak]] OR [[:Yankee Rowe]] OR [[:Maine Yankee]] OR [[:Quad Cities]] OR [[:Humboldt Bay]] OR [[:La Crosse]] OR [[:Big Rock Point]] OR [[:Rancho Seco]] OR [[:Zion]] OR [[:Midland]] OR [[:Bellefonte]] OR [[:Fort Calhoun]] OR [[:FitzPatrick]] OR [[:McGuire]] OR [[:LaSalle]] OR [[:Fort Saint Vrain]] OR [[:Shoreham]] OR [[:Satsop]] OR [[:Trojan]] OR [[:Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant]] </code>. |
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-OpO1 August 21, 1997 NRC INFORMATION
NOTICE 97-67: FAILURE TO SATISFY REQUIREMENTS
FOR SIGNIFICANT
MANIPULATIONS
OF THE CONTROLS FOR POWER REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSING
Addressees
All holders of operating
licenses for nuclear power reactors except those who have permanently
ceased operations
and have certified
that fuel has been permanently
removed from the reactor vessel.
Purpose
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing this information
notice to alert addressees
that operator license applicants
are required to perform at least five significant
control manipulations
on the facility for which a license Is sought (Section 55.31 (a)(5) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
[10 CFR 55.31(a)(5)]).
Licensees
have erred on the interpretation
of the requirements
of this section of 10 CFR Part 55. It is expected that recipients
will review information
for applicability
to their facilities
and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.
However, suggestions
contained
in this information
notice are not NRC requirements;
therefore, no specific action or written response is required.Description
of Circumstances
Operator license applicants
are required to provide evidence that they, as trainees, have successfully
manipulated
the controls of the facility for which an operator or senior operator license is sought. At a minimum, applicants
must perform five significant
control manipulations
which affect reactivity
or power level on the facility for which the license is sought (10 CFR 55.31(a)(5)).
Controls as defined in 10 CFR 55 are apparatus
and mechanisms, the manipulation
of which directly affects the reactivity
or power level of the reactor. Licensees
have erred on the interpretation
of what constitutes
a significant
control manipulation.
During a review of operator license applications
for the Pilgrim facility, NRC inspectors
determined
that the requirements
for operator and senior operator applicants
to perform at least five significant
control manipulations
on the facility were not satisfied.
The Pilgrim licensee incorrectly
assumed that a single 30 percent decrease in power with recirculation
pumps was equivalent
to three 10 percent or greater power reductions
and counted this as three of the five required significant
control manipulations.
The licensee contacted
other licensees
regarding
the practice at their facilities
and reported that there was a wide range of interpretations
by the other licensees
contacted.
I I_pDp4 rceq -01 1101'2¢Q05020 Hills r, .'Y 4 IN 97-67 August 21, 1997 The NRC administered
examinations
to the individuals
but did not issue operator licenses until the facility submitted
revised applications
and provided details of how the applicants
satisfied
the requirements
to perform the required significant
control manipulations.
As documented
in "Pilgrim Examination
Report 50-293/97-006 and Notice of Violation," (Accession
No. 9707290261), dated July 18, 1997, the NRC determined
that a violation
of NRC requirements
had occurred because two applicants
had not completed
the five significant
control manipulations
required by 10 CFR 55.31 (a)(5) in an acceptable
manner.Discussion
Before 1987, the operator license application
required the licensee to certify that the applicant
had learned to operate the facility and also to provide the details of the training and experience
of the applicant.
A 1987 NRC rule changed the requirement
to provide the details of the applicant's
training and experience
and requested
instead a simple check mark in the boxes on the application
form (NRC-398)
to indicate that the applicant
has successfully
completed
an Institute
of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) accredited
operator training program that is based on a systems approach to training, and that a certified
simulation
facility is used in the operator training program.During rule making, the nuclear industry requested
clarification
of the phrase "leamed to operate" (Federal Register Vol. 52, No. 57 Wednesday, March 25, 1987, page 9456) and NRC added 10 CFR 55.31 (a)(5) to specify the minimum number of control manipulations
that the applicant
had to conduct on the facility.Examples of significant
control manipulations
are contained
In Regulatory
Guide (RG) 1.8, Revision 2, "Qualification
and Training of Personnel
for Nuclear Power Plants." Paragraph
C.1.h. of RG 1.8 states in part that: Control room operating
experience
...should include manipulation
of controls of the facility during a minimum of five reactivity
changes. Every effort should be made to have a diversity
of reactivity
changes for each applicant.
Startups, shutdowns, large load changes, and changes in rod programming
are some examples and could be accomplished
by manually using such systems as rod control, chemical shim control, or recirculation
flow.Additional
examples of significant
control manipulations
include, but are not limited to, items A-F of 10 CFR 55.59(c)(3) (on-thejob
training for requalification):
IN 97-67 August 21, 1997 A. Plant or reactor startups to include a range that reactivity
feedback from nuclear heat addition is noticeable
and heatup rate is established.
B. Plant shutdown.C. Manual control of steam generators
or feedwater
or both during startup and shutdown.D. Boration or dilution during power operation.
E. Significant ( 10 percent) power changes in manual control or recirculation
flow.F. Reactor power change of 10 percent or greater where load change is performed
with load limit control or where flux, temperature, or speed control is on manual (for HTGR).As defined in 10 CFR 55.59(c)(3)(E), a 10 percent or greater power change is considered
to be a significant
control manipulation.
Additional
clarification
was provided in NUREG-1262,"Answers to Questions
at Public Meetings Regarding
Implementation
of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 55 on Operators'
Licenses," dated November 1987, which was transmitted
to all licensees
on November 12, 1987, as an attachment
to Generic Letter 87-16 (Accession
No. 8712030029).
Some of the guidance included in NUREG 1262 is reiterated
below; licensees
should refer to NUREG 1262 for additional
details.The situation
in which an applicant
performs a 30 percent change in power in a short period (i.e., on the same shift) with no diversity
of controls would be evaluated
as one significant
control manipulation.
The situation
in which an applicant
reduces power from 100 percent to 95 percent and then increases
power from 95 percent to 100 percent would be evaluated
as one significant
control manipulation.
The situation
when an applicant
performs a 50 percent change in power in a short period of time with diversity
of controls (recirculation
flow and control rods, or chemical shim and controls rods) can be evaluated
as two significant
control manipulations.
The situations
when an applicant
reduces power by 10 percent then holds there for performance
of other work or testing and then later in the shift increases
power by 10 percent can be evaluated
as two significant
control manipulations.
Diversity
of significant
control manipulations
on the plant are expected;
however, it is not required.
If the applicant
does not have experience
in diverse significant
control manipulations, this fact should be noted in the comments section of NRC form 398.
.I IN 97-67 August 21, 1997 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please contact one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Maryle on, Fiting Director Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
contacts: Brian Hughes, NRR 301-415-1096 E-mail: bxhl@nrc.gov
John Pellet, RIV (817) 860-8159 E-mail: jlp@nrc.gov
Donald Florek, RI (610) 337-5185 E-mail: djfl@nrc.gov
Thomas Peebles, RII (404) 562-4638 E-mail: tap@nrc.gov
Mel Leach, Rill (630) 829-9705 E-mail: mnl@nrc.gov
Attachment:
List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices ,5 A ge Tech Editor has reveiwed and concurred
on 7/8/97 DOCUMENT NAME: G:ICDPIN95X7A.BXH
To receive a copy of this document.
hIdlcate hI the box: C -Copy without ettachment/enclosure
'E -Copy with attachmentfenclosure
'N' -No copy OFFICE HOLB/DRCH
I HOLB/DRCH
I PECB [__ PECB/NRR NAME BHughes:rc/bh
RGallo Cpetrone AChaffee G us{DATE 08/06/97*
08/07/97*
08/14/97*
08/14/97*
0819797 lOFFICIAL
RECORD COPY
I -Attachment
IN 97-66 August 20, 1997 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED NRC INFORMATION
NOTICES Information
Date of Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to 97-66 Failures to Provide 08/20/97 All holders of oDeratir ia licenses Special Lenses for Operators
Using Respirator
or Self-Contained
Breathing Apparatus
During Emergency
Operations
or construction
permits for nuclear power and non-power reactors and all licensed reactor operators
and senior operators 97-65 Failures of High-Dose- Rate (HDR) Remote After-loading Device Source Guide Tubes, Catheters, and Applicators
08/15/97 All high-dose-rate (HDR)remote afterloader
licensees 97-64 97-63 97-62 97-61 Potential
Problems Associated
with Loss of Electrical
Power in Certain Teletherapy
Units Status of NRC Staff's Review of BWRVIP-05 Unrecognized
Reactivity
Addition During Plant Shutdown U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services Letter, to Medical Device Manu-facturers, on the Year 2000 Problem 08/13/97 08/07/97 08/06/97 08/06/97 All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
medical tele-therapy licensees All holders of OLs or CPs for boiling water reactors All holders of OLs or CPs*for nuclear power reactors All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
medical licensees, veterinarians, and manu-facturers/distributors
of medical devices OL = Operating
License CP = Construction
Permit
IN 97-XX August XX, 1997 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please contact one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Dir ctor Division of Reactor ProgramWianagement
Office of Nuclear Reactor egulation Technical
contacts:
Brian Hughes, NRR John Pellet, RIV 301-415-1096
(817) 860-8159 E-mail: bxhl@nrc.gov
E-mail: jlp@nrc. v Donald Florek, RI Thomas P les, RI1 (610) 337-1585 (404) 56 638 E-mail: djfl@nrc.gov
E-mailf pnrc.gov Mel Leach, Rill (630) 829-9705 E-mail: mnl@nrc.gov
Attachment:
List of Recently Issued N Information
Notices DOCUMENT NAME: G:1CDP1lN9pX7A.BXH
/To receive a copy of this document.
Indicate hI the box: *C -Copy without attachmentlenclosure
E -Copy with attachment/enclosure
N' -No copy 4 A OFFICE HOLB/DRCH
' HOLB/DRCH
PEC &NAME BHughes:rc/bh
RGallo Cpet'rone
kc-hafftee
DATE 08/06/97*, 08/07/97*
08/)cf/97
08/ #( /97 (A) DRPM 11slosson 08/ /97 UV-VILIAL
KtLUUV LUFY'y9'Y% 1V I
IN 97-XX July XX. 1997 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.you have any questions
about the information
in this notice. please c act (one of) the technical
contact(s)
listed below or the appropriate
ice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Jack Roe. Acting rector Division of Rea or Program Management
Office of Nuc ar Reactor Regulation
Technical
contact(s):
Brian Hughes. NRR/HOL (301) 415-1096 E-Mail: BXH1@NRC.
V Donald Florek, egion I Thomas Peebles. Region II (610) 337-158 (404) 562-4638 E-Mail: DJ @NRC.GOV E-Mail: TAP@NRC.GOV
Mel Leac .Region III John Pellet. Region IV (630) 29-9705 (817) 860-8159 E-Mai. MNL@NRC.GOV
E-Mail: JLP@NRC.GOV
Attachment:
List of Recen y Issued NRC Information
Notices*See previous concurrence
To receive a copy of this document.
Indlicate
In the bo C -Copy without attachment/enclosure
E -Copy with attachment/enclosure
'N' -No copy OFFICE HOLB/DRCH
TECH/EDITOR
l PECB/NRR DRPM/NRR NAME BHughes:rc/bht.
RGallo'f DCalureA d AChaffee JRoe DATE 08/06/97*
08 /97 07/08/97*
08/ /97 08/ /97 I ..INFORMATION
NOTICE FORMAT This information
notice requires no specific action or written res onse. If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please ntact (one of)the technical
contact(s)
listed below or the appropriate
fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Marylee M. osson, Director Division Reactor Program Management
Office Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
contact(s):
Brian ghes, NRR/HOLB 301- 5-1096 E- 11: BXH1@NRC.GOV
onald Florek, Region I Thomas Peebles, Region II 610-337-1585
404-562-4638 E-Mail: DJF1@NRC.GOV
E-Mail: TAP@NRC.GOV
Mel Leach, Region III John Pellet. Region IV--- --- ----eS no o a 63U-829-9/Ub
E-Mail: MNL@NRC.GOV
E/-MaJU-iJb
G E-Mail: JLP@NRC.GOV
Attachment:
List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices To receive a copy of this document, hIdicate hi the box: 'C -Copy without attachmentlenclosure
WE' -Copy with attachment/enclosure
'N" -No copy OFFICE HOLB/DRCH
I HOLB/DRCH
I TECH/EDITOR
I PECB/NRR I DRPM/NRR l l INAME BHughes:rc/bh
RGallo DCalure4UPP
AChaffee MSlosson DATE 08/6 /97 08/ /97 08/ /97 08/ /97 07/ /97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Issue Date: 03/21/94 E20-5 0720, Exhibit 20
|
---|
|
list | - Information Notice 1997-01, Improper Electrical Grounding Results in Simultaneous Fires in the Control Room and the Safe-Shutdown Equipment Room (8 January 1997, Topic: Safe Shutdown, Emergency Lighting)
- Information Notice 1997-02, Cracks Found in Jet Pump Riser Assembly Elbows at Boiling Water Reactors (6 February 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-03, Defacing of Labels to Comply with 10 CFR 20.1904(b) (20 February 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-04, Implementation of a New Constraint on Radioactive Air Effluents (24 February 1997, Topic: Backfit)
- Information Notice 1997-05, Offsite Notification Capabilities (27 February 1997, Topic: Earthquake)
- Information Notice 1997-06, Weaknesses in Plant-Specific Emergency Operating Procedures for Refilling the Secondary Side of Dry Once-Through Steam Generators (4 March 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-07, Problems Identified During Generic Letter 89-10 Closeout Inspections (6 March 1997, Topic: Hot Short, Safe Shutdown, Weak link)
- Information Notice 1997-08, Potential Failures of General Electric Magne-Blast Circuit Breaker Subcomponents (12 March 1997, Topic: Coatings, Weak link)
- Information Notice 1997-09, Inadequate Main Steam Safety Valve (MSSV) Setpoints and Performance Issues Associated with Long MSSV Inlet Piping (12 March 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-10, Liner Plate Corrosion in Concrete Containments (13 March 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-11, Cement Erosion from Containment Subfoundations at Nuclear Power Plants (21 March 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-12, Potential Armature Binding in General Electric Type Hga Relays (24 March 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-13, Deficient Conditions Associated with Protective Coatings at Nuclear Power Plants (24 March 1997, Topic: Coatings)
- Information Notice 1997-14, Assessment of Spent Fuel Pool Cooling (28 March 1997, Topic: Time to boil, Coatings)
- Information Notice 1997-15, Reporting of Errors and Changes in Large-Break Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Models of Fuel Vendors and Compliance with 10 CFR 50. 46(a)(3) (4 April 1997, Topic: Coatings, Fuel cladding)
- Information Notice 1997-16, Preconditioning of Plant Structures, Systems, and Components Before ASME Code Inservice Testing or Technical Specification Surveillance Testing (4 April 1997, Topic: Stroke time, Coatings)
- Information Notice 1997-17, Cracking of Vertical Welds in the Core Shroud and Degraded Repair (4 April 1997, Topic: Coatings)
- Information Notice 1997-18, Problems Identified During Maintenance Rule Baseline Inspections (14 April 1997, Topic: Probabilistic Risk Assessment, Coatings, Emergency Lighting)
- Information Notice 1997-19, Safety Injection System Weld Flaw at Sequcyah Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 (18 April 1997, Topic: Boric Acid)
- Information Notice 1997-20, Identification of Certain Uranium Hexafluoride Cylinders That Do Not Comply with ANSI N14.1 Fabrication Standards (17 April 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-21, Availability of Alternate AC Power Source Designed for Station Blackout Event (18 April 1997, Topic: Main transformer failure)
- Information Notice 1997-22, Failure of Welded-Steel Moment Resisting Frames During Northridge Earthquake (25 April 1997, Topic: Earthquake)
- Information Notice 1997-23, Evaluation and Reporting of Fires and Unplanned Chemical Reaction Events at Fuel Cycle Facilities (7 May 1997, Topic: Earthquake)
- Information Notice 1997-24, Failure of Packing Nuts on One-Inch Uranium Hexafluoride Cylinder Valves (8 May 1997, Topic: Uranium Hexafluoride)
- Information Notice 1997-25, Dynamic Range Uncertainties in the Reactor Vessel Level Instrumentation (9 May 1997, Topic: Earthquake)
- Information Notice 1997-26, Degradation in Small-Radius U-Bend Regions of Steam Generator Tubes (19 May 1997, Topic: Earthquake)
- Information Notice 1997-27, Effect of Incorrect Strainer Pressure Drop on Available Net Positive Suction Head (16 May 1997, Topic: Earthquake)
- Information Notice 1997-28, Elimination of Instrument Response Time Testing Under the Requirements of 10 CFR 50.59 (30 May 1997, Topic: Enforcement Discretion)
- Information Notice 1997-29, Containment Inspection Rule (30 May 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-30, Control of Licensed Material During Reorganizations, Employee-Management Disagreements, and Financial Crises (3 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-31, Failures of Reactor Coolant Pump Thermal Barriers and Check Valves in Foreign Plants (3 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-32, Defective Worm Shaft Clutch Gears in Limitorque Motor-Operated Valve Actuators (10 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-33, Unanticipated Effect of Ventilation System on Tank Level Indications and Engineering Safety Features Actuation System Setpoint (11 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-34, Deficiencies in Licensee Submittals Regarding Terminology for Radiological Emergency Action Levels in Accordance with the New Part 20 (12 June 1997, Topic: Deep Dose Equivalent)
- Information Notice 1997-34, Deficiencies in Licensee Submittals Regarding Terminology for Radiological Emergency Action Levels In Accordance with the New Part 20 (12 June 1997, Topic: Deep Dose Equivalent)
- Information Notice 1997-35, Retrofit to Industrial Nuclear Company (Inc) IR100 Radiography Camera to Correct Inconsistency in 10 CFR Part 34 Compatibility (18 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-35, Retrofit to Industrial Nuclear Company (INC) Ir100 Radiography Camera to Correct Inconsistency in 10 CFR Part 34 Compatibility (18 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-36, Unplanned Intakes by Worker of Transuranic Airborne Radioactive Materials and External Exposure Due to Inadequate Control of Work (20 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-37, Main Transformer Fault with Ensuing Oil Spill Into Turbine Building (20 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-38, Level-Sensing System Initiates Common-Mode Faulure of High-Pressure-Injection Pumps (24 June 1997, Topic: Hydrostatic)
- Information Notice 1997-39, Inadequate 10 CFR 72.48 Safety Evaluations of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (26 June 1997, Topic: Uranium Hexafluoride)
- Information Notice 1997-40, Potential Nitrogen Accumulation Resulting from Backleakage from Safety Injection Tanks (26 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-41, Revised - Potentially Undersized Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Oil Coolers (27 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-42, Management Weaknesses Resulting in Failure to Comply with Shipping Requirements for Special Nuclear Material (27 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-43, License Condition Compliance (1 July 1997, Topic: Ultimate heat sink)
- Information Notice 1997-44, Failures of Gamma Metrics Wide-Range Linear Neutron Flux Channels (1 July 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-45, Environmental Qualification Deficiency for Cables & Containment Penetration Pigtails (2 July 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-46, Unisolable Crack in High-Pressure Injection Piping (9 July 1997, Topic: Flow Induced Vibration)
- Information Notice 1997-47, Inadequate Puncture Tests for Type B Packages Under 10 CFR 71.73(c)(3) (27 June 1997)
- Information Notice 1997-48, Inadequate or Inappropriate Interim Fire Protection Compensatory Measures (9 July 1997, Topic: Safe Shutdown, Unanalyzed Condition, Fire Barrier, Emergency Lighting, Continuous fire watch, Fire Protection Program, Fire Watch)
... further results |
---|