ML16134A578: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Columbia Generating StationPre-Submittal MeetingLicense Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)
{{#Wiki_filter:Columbia Generating Station Pre-Submittal Meeting License Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)  
Power UprateMay 2, 2016 EN Participants:Dave Kettering -Design Engineering ManagerAlex Javorik -VP EngineeringDave Brown -System Engineering ManagerLisa Williams -Licensing SupervisorDan Moon -MUR Project Technical RepresentativeJim Brownell -MUR Project Manager2 AgendaBackgroundLicense Amendment Request (LAR) overviewLeading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)LAR scheduleConclusions Questions3 Background4Columbia PowerLevelsOriginal Licensed Thermal Power3323 MWtCurrent Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWtColumbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment LAR OverviewLAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power Optimization, May 2003ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM  
 
ŽSystem, March 1997ER-157P-A, Supplement to CaldonTopical Report ER-80P: Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlusSystem, May 20085 LAR Overview (continued)Completeness of information  Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR requestContains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate ApplicationsIncorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals6 Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)Cameron Check PlusŽ Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)One on each feedwater lineUncertainty values determined by Alden LabsCommissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM7 LEFM -Modes of Operation8LEFM Modes of OperationPower LevelLEFM UncertaintyBoth in Check PlusNormal operation at  3544 MWt 0.3%One in Check Plus andone in CheckOR Both in CheckReturn to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%One or more in FailReturn to CheckOR Reduce powerto 3486 MWtN/A LAR ScheduleOutage implementation is preferredLAR Technical Review CompletePre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016Implement during refueling outage (R23) -starts 5/13/2017Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017)9 ConclusionsColumbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changesAll required information is included in LAR submittalIncludes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10 Questions or Feedback?11 Columbia Generating StationPre-Submittal MeetingLicense Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)
Power Uprate May 2, 2016 EN Participants:Dave Kettering -
Power UprateMay 2, 2016 EN Participants:Dave Kettering -Design Engineering ManagerAlex Javorik -VP EngineeringDave Brown -System Engineering ManagerLisa Williams -Licensing SupervisorDan Moon -MUR Project Technical RepresentativeJim Brownell -MUR Project Manager2 AgendaBackgroundLicense Amendment Request (LAR) overviewLeading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)LAR scheduleConclusions Questions3 Background4Columbia PowerLevelsOriginal Licensed Thermal Power3323 MWtCurrent Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWtColumbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment LAR OverviewLAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power Optimization, May 2003ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM  
Design Engineering ManagerAlex Javorik -
ŽSystem, March 1997ER-157P-A, Supplement to CaldonTopical Report ER-80P: Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlusSystem, May 20085 LAR Overview (continued)Completeness of information  Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR requestContains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate ApplicationsIncorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals6 Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)Cameron Check PlusŽ Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)One on each feedwater lineUncertainty values determined by Alden LabsCommissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM7 LEFM -Modes of Operation8LEFM Modes of OperationPower LevelLEFM UncertaintyBoth in Check PlusNormal operation at  3544 MWt 0.3%One in Check Plus andone in CheckOR Both in CheckReturn to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%One or more in FailReturn to CheckOR Reduce powerto 3486 MWtN/A LAR ScheduleOutage implementation is preferredLAR Technical Review CompletePre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016Implement during refueling outage (R23) -starts 5/13/2017Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017)9 ConclusionsColumbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changesAll required information is included in LAR submittalIncludes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10 Questions or Feedback?11}}
VP EngineeringDave Brown -System Engineering ManagerLisa Williams -Licensing SupervisorDan Moon -MUR Project Technical RepresentativeJim Brownell -MUR Project Manager 2
AgendaBackgroundLicense Amendment Request (LAR) overviewLeading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)LAR scheduleConclusions Questions 3
 
===Background===
4Columbia PowerLevelsOriginal Licensed Thermal Power3323 MWtCurrent Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWtColumbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment LAR OverviewLAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power  
 
Optimization, May 2003ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM  
ŽSystem, March 1997ER-157P-A, Supplement to CaldonTopical Report ER-80P: Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlusSystem, May 2008 5
LAR Overview (continued)Completeness of information  Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR requestContains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate ApplicationsIncorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals 6
Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)Cameron Check PlusŽ Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)One on each feedwater lineUncertainty values determined by Alden LabsCommissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM7 LEFM -Modes of Operation 8LEFM Modes of OperationPower Level LEFM UncertaintyBoth in Check PlusNormal operation at  3544 MWt 0.3%One in Check Plus andone in Check OR Both in CheckReturn to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%One or more in FailReturn to Check OR Reduce powerto 3486 MWt N/A LAR ScheduleOutage implementation is preferredLAR Technical Review CompletePre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016Implement during refueling outage (R23) -starts 5/13/2017Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017) 9 ConclusionsColumbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changesAll required information is included in LAR submittalIncludes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10 Questions or Feedback?
11 Columbia Generating Station Pre-Submittal Meeting License Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)  
 
Power Uprate May 2, 2016 EN Participants:Dave Kettering -
Design Engineering ManagerAlex Javorik -
VP EngineeringDave Brown -System Engineering ManagerLisa Williams -Licensing SupervisorDan Moon -MUR Project Technical RepresentativeJim Brownell -MUR Project Manager 2
AgendaBackgroundLicense Amendment Request (LAR) overviewLeading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)LAR scheduleConclusions Questions 3
 
===Background===
4Columbia PowerLevelsOriginal Licensed Thermal Power3323 MWtCurrent Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWtColumbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment LAR OverviewLAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power  
 
Optimization, May 2003ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM  
ŽSystem, March 1997ER-157P-A, Supplement to CaldonTopical Report ER-80P: Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlusSystem, May 2008 5
LAR Overview (continued)Completeness of information  Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR requestContains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate ApplicationsIncorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals 6
Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)Cameron Check PlusŽ Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)One on each feedwater lineUncertainty values determined by Alden LabsCommissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM7 LEFM -Modes of Operation 8LEFM Modes of OperationPower Level LEFM UncertaintyBoth in Check PlusNormal operation at  3544 MWt 0.3%One in Check Plus andone in Check OR Both in CheckReturn to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%One or more in FailReturn to Check OR Reduce powerto 3486 MWt N/A LAR ScheduleOutage implementation is preferredLAR Technical Review CompletePre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016Implement during refueling outage (R23) -starts 5/13/2017Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017) 9 ConclusionsColumbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changesAll required information is included in LAR submittalIncludes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10 Questions or Feedback?
11}}

Revision as of 08:41, 30 June 2018

5/2/16, Meeting Slides for Pre-Submittal Meeting Regarding License Amendment Request Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (Mur) Power Uprate
ML16134A578
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 05/02/2016
From:
Energy Northwest
To: John Klos
Plant Licensing Branch IV
Klos L J
References
Download: ML16134A578 (11)


Text

Columbia Generating Station Pre-Submittal Meeting License Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)

Power Uprate May 2, 2016 EN Participants:Dave Kettering -

Design Engineering ManagerAlex Javorik -

VP EngineeringDave Brown -System Engineering ManagerLisa Williams -Licensing SupervisorDan Moon -MUR Project Technical RepresentativeJim Brownell -MUR Project Manager 2

AgendaBackgroundLicense Amendment Request (LAR) overviewLeading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)LAR scheduleConclusions Questions 3

Background

4Columbia PowerLevelsOriginal Licensed Thermal Power3323 MWtCurrent Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWtColumbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment LAR OverviewLAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power

Optimization, May 2003ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM

ŽSystem, March 1997ER-157P-A, Supplement to CaldonTopical Report ER-80P: Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlusSystem, May 2008 5

LAR Overview (continued)Completeness of information Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR requestContains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate ApplicationsIncorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals 6

Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)Cameron Check PlusŽ Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)One on each feedwater lineUncertainty values determined by Alden LabsCommissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM7 LEFM -Modes of Operation 8LEFM Modes of OperationPower Level LEFM UncertaintyBoth in Check PlusNormal operation at 3544 MWt 0.3%One in Check Plus andone in Check OR Both in CheckReturn to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%One or more in FailReturn to Check OR Reduce powerto 3486 MWt N/A LAR ScheduleOutage implementation is preferredLAR Technical Review CompletePre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016Implement during refueling outage (R23) -starts 5/13/2017Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017) 9 ConclusionsColumbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changesAll required information is included in LAR submittalIncludes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10 Questions or Feedback?

11 Columbia Generating Station Pre-Submittal Meeting License Amendment Request for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)

Power Uprate May 2, 2016 EN Participants:Dave Kettering -

Design Engineering ManagerAlex Javorik -

VP EngineeringDave Brown -System Engineering ManagerLisa Williams -Licensing SupervisorDan Moon -MUR Project Technical RepresentativeJim Brownell -MUR Project Manager 2

AgendaBackgroundLicense Amendment Request (LAR) overviewLeading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)LAR scheduleConclusions Questions 3

Background

4Columbia PowerLevelsOriginal Licensed Thermal Power3323 MWtCurrent Licensed Thermal Power 3486 MWt Proposed MUR Thermal Power 3544 MWtColumbia is a BWR-5, Mark II containment LAR OverviewLAR technical evaluation based on NRC approved Topical Reports:NEDC-32938P-A, Generic Guidelines and Evaluations for General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Thermal Power

Optimization, May 2003ER-80P, Improving Thermal Power Accuracy and Plant Safety While Increasing Operating Power Level Using the LEFM

ŽSystem, March 1997ER-157P-A, Supplement to CaldonTopical Report ER-80P: Basis for Power Uprates with an LEFM Check or an LEFM CheckPlusSystem, May 2008 5

LAR Overview (continued)Completeness of information Addresses the criteria contained in the NRC Safety Evaluations for LEFM Topical Reports that are required to be addressed as part of the MUR requestContains a cross-reference matrix showing the location of information required by Attachment 1 of RIS 2002-03, Guidance on the Content of MUR Uprate ApplicationsIncorporates responses to applicable requests for additional information from other MUR submittals 6

Leading Edge Flow Meter (LEFM)Cameron Check PlusŽ Two LEFM systems installed in R22 (2015)One on each feedwater lineUncertainty values determined by Alden LabsCommissioned through the Cameron Process Columbia specific operating experience using LEFM7 LEFM -Modes of Operation 8LEFM Modes of OperationPower Level LEFM UncertaintyBoth in Check PlusNormal operation at 3544 MWt 0.3%One in Check Plus andone in Check OR Both in CheckReturn to Check Plus OR Reduce power to 3537 MWt 0.5%One or more in FailReturn to Check OR Reduce powerto 3486 MWt N/A LAR ScheduleOutage implementation is preferredLAR Technical Review CompletePre-submittal Meeting 5/2/2016Bonneville Power Administration Grid Stability Report 7/1/2016Submit Amendment Request 7/15/2016Implement during refueling outage (R23) -starts 5/13/2017Request approval prior to R23 (May 2017) 9 ConclusionsColumbia MUR amendment request is based on NRC approved guidance Not accompanied by other (unrelated) requests or changesAll required information is included in LAR submittalIncludes a proposed power level for LEFM Check Mode Outage implementation is preferred Request 10-month NRC review period 10 Questions or Feedback?

11