|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:}} | | {{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/9/18 9:56 AM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 , PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-gtgt Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0065 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 I. ---S.ubmitter Information ~* fJ. FR 5J Cfl/1/ Name: Edward Hopkins Address: 4978 Niagara Ave #9 |
| | * San Diego, CA, 92107 Email: edwardehopkins@yahoo.com 11 /1,1" /tf(0/7 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 . Add= J~~~m,#t C..Y<s 5.J **---*---------------**------------------*-**--*--------~--------*-*--*--*-~--------------~--*-----*----' General Comment As a Dartmoth College trained scientist and engineer with 20 years of experience I am completely shocked by the decision to use light walled steel cases in such close vicinity to salt water which degrades metal at a very fast rate, not. to mention the earthquake and tsunami risk. Clearly the Yucca Mountain project would have been the most intelligent long term storage option and it is unfortunate that bipartisan bickering has destroyed a national resource. The danger with this project is not only the risk of a radiation leak that could affect tens of millions if Southern California residents, but that it also will set legal precedence for all other reactor waste storage sites across the nation. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 This is a poorly planned project that does not even meet minimum military standards even though it is on leased Navy property, and is a political boondoggle that will continue to significantly degrade the reputation of anyone who chooses to fight for it until some reasonable and intelligent optJon is at least considered. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 |
| | }} |
Revision as of 07:56, 20 April 2018
|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML20161A0122020-06-0808 June 2020
Comment (48) of Martin Kral on Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project
ML20115E5482020-04-24024 April 2020
Comment (23) of Pam and Greg Nelson on Holtec International HI-STORE Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project
ML18155A3262018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (49) of Eva M. O'Keefe on Very Low-Level Radioactive Waste Scoping Study
ML18158A1872018-06-0101 June 2018
Comment (51) of Gayle Smith Concerning Nuclear Waste in San Onofre Research and Action Is Needed to Protect the Public
ML18158A1862018-05-29029 May 2018
Comment (50) of Joanna Mathews Concerning San Onofre Nuclear Station to Find a Permanent Solution for the Nuclear Waste
ML18155A3252018-05-29029 May 2018
Comment (48) of Quentin De Bruyn Opposing to San Onofre Waste Situation
ML18066A5612018-03-0707 March 2018
Comment (161) of Matt Collins Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5552018-03-0707 March 2018
Comment (157) of Kathleen Morris Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5582018-03-0707 March 2018
Comment (159) of Anonymous on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5292018-01-22022 January 2018
Comment (140) of Patricia Martz Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5262018-01-22022 January 2018
Comment (139) of Abell Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5252018-01-22022 January 2018
Comment (138) of Michelle Schumacher Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5532018-01-22022 January 2018
Comment (155) of Jan Boudart on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5302018-01-16016 January 2018
Comment (141) of Erin Koch on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5322018-01-10010 January 2018
Comment 142 of Dave Rice on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5372018-01-0808 January 2018
Comment (146) of Carey Strombotne on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5392018-01-0404 January 2018
Comment 147 of Phoebe Sorgen on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5512018-01-0303 January 2018
Comment (153) of Alexander Bay Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5562018-01-0303 January 2018
Comment (158) of Lee Mclendon Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5492018-01-0303 January 2018
Comment (152) of Shari Horne Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18066A5242018-01-0303 January 2018
Comment (137) of Joseph Gildner Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A5962018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (60) of Matthew Stein Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18032A1932018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (44) of Mha Atma S. Khalsa Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A5952018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (59) of Chelsea Anonymous Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18032A1952018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (45) of T. Strohmeier on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A5932018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (57) of Patrick Bosold Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A5702018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (56) of Katya Gaynor on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A5692018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (55) of Robert Hensley on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A5672018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (54) of Angela Sarich Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18032A1972018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (46) of Cheryl Harding Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A5632018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (52) of Viraja Prema on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A5622018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (51) of Larisa Stow-Norman Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A4982018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (66) of Nancy Alexander Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18033A4962018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (65) of Lorna Farnun Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18032A2002018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (49) of Starr Cornwall Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18032A1992018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (48) of Daryl Gale on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18037A6822018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (94) of Jennifer Quest on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18032A1922018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (43) of Frances Howard Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18037A6992018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (108) from Anonymous Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG
ML18037A6972018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (107) of Diana Dehm on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18037A6922018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (104) of Ari Marsh on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18037A6912018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (103) Christina Koppisch Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG
ML18037A6902018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (102) of Helen Hanna on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18037A6892018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (100) of Cindy Koch Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18037A6882018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (101) Angela Ravenwood Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG
ML18037A6872018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (99) of Melissa Brizzie Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18036A1912018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (72) of J. C. Chernicky Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18037A6812018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (93) of Ricardo Toro Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18037A6802018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (92) of Stan Weber Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18036A2082018-01-0202 January 2018
Comment (89) of B. Grace on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
2020-06-08
[Table view] |
Text
As of: 1/9/18 9:56 AM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of2 , PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pf-gtgt Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0065 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 I. ---S.ubmitter Information ~* fJ. FR 5J Cfl/1/ Name: Edward Hopkins Address: 4978 Niagara Ave #9
- San Diego, CA, 92107 Email: edwardehopkins@yahoo.com 11 /1,1" /tf(0/7 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 . Add= J~~~m,#t C..Y<s 5.J **---*---------------**------------------*-**--*--------~--------*-*--*--*-~--------------~--*-----*----' General Comment As a Dartmoth College trained scientist and engineer with 20 years of experience I am completely shocked by the decision to use light walled steel cases in such close vicinity to salt water which degrades metal at a very fast rate, not. to mention the earthquake and tsunami risk. Clearly the Yucca Mountain project would have been the most intelligent long term storage option and it is unfortunate that bipartisan bickering has destroyed a national resource. The danger with this project is not only the risk of a radiation leak that could affect tens of millions if Southern California residents, but that it also will set legal precedence for all other reactor waste storage sites across the nation. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018 Page 2 of2 This is a poorly planned project that does not even meet minimum military standards even though it is on leased Navy property, and is a political boondoggle that will continue to significantly degrade the reputation of anyone who chooses to fight for it until some reasonable and intelligent optJon is at least considered. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90853&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018
