ML12172A069

Oyster Creek - Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)

ML12172A069
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	06/13/2012
From:	Exelon Nuclear
To:	D'Antonio J Operations Branch I
Shared Package
ML120230007	List: IR 05000219/2012301 ML120250519 ML12128A224 ML12159A244 ML12159A252 ML12159A258 ML12159A391 ML12165A601 ML12165A609 ML12165A635 ML12172A069
References
TAC U01848
Download: ML12172A069 (15)

Text

-final-forms-IDs doc :

Preparation Checklist Form ES*201*1 Facility:

Oyster Date of Examination:

5/14 5/242012 Developed Written -Facility X NRCD /I Operating

-Facility X NRCD Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference)

Examiner's Initials -180 Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) -120 NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) ,;;

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) [-90] eference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] Oz {-75} Integrated examination outline(s) due. in Forms ES-201-2, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-S, ES -401-1/2, ES-401-3, ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; .a , {-70} Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-4S} Proposed examinations (including written. walk-through JPMs. scenarios.

as applicable).

supporting documentation (including ES-301-3.

ES-301-4.

ES-301-S, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; ;r -30 Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; 0 -14 Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) -14 I Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review ;:7 (C.2.h; C.3.f) -14 xaminations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) /;A -7 Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) -7 Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications 1 eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) -7 Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines with facility licensee !/ -7 Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and distributed to NRC examiners

• Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case basis in coordination with the facility

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility.

Oyster Date of Examination:

5/14112 Initials Item Task Description a b' cll 1. a. Verify that the outIlne(s) fll(s) the appropriate model, In accordance With /,1 III f1 R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared In accordance WIth Section IY I D.1 of eS-401 and whether all KIA categorle$

are appropriately sampled. (I 'Y T Assess whether the outlIne over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 11 T N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. 7 tV Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the requIred numberfI q" of normal evolutions, Instrument and component failures, technical and major transients. S I Assess whether there ere enough scenario sets (and spares) 10 test the projected number M and mix of applicants In accordance WIth the expected crew composition and rotation schedute U without compromising exam Integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using II 'Y l at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

that no scenarios are duplicated A T from the applicants' audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent IY o To the extent possible, assess whether the outIine(s) conform(s)

WIth the qualitative1/ ..y and quentitatlve criteria specified on Form ES*301-4 and described In Appendix rr V43f1fy that the systems walk-through outIIna meets the criteria specified on Form ES*301*2: 3 the outIIne(s}

contaln(s) the required number of control room and In-plant distributed among the safety functions as specified on the W task repetition from the last two NRC examlnalfons Is WIthin the Ilmits specified on the formIf ryno tasks are duplicated from the apptfcants' audit test(s)T the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form the number of alternate path.low*power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria 'Y on the b Verily that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form et least one task is new or slgnWlcantly modified If 1{ no more than one task Is repealed from the last two NRC licensing examinations

¥ Determine W there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no Itams are duplicated on subSequent days. II '1' /' 4. a. Aissess whether plant-specific priorities (Including PM and IPE Insights) are covered r In the appropriate exam f( '7 G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is

{If rg tV N c, Ensure that KIA Importance ratings (except lor plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 /1 tv E '1/R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam 1'1 V A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

II if "'}L f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or /I ,I')" 1-' Printed Name 1

_ ..;./ e, Author Jeffrev z." 'Z.. b. Facility RevhlWer (O) c. NRC Chlell:xarnlner (II) 5 d. NRC tr , NOTE: 1/ Independent NRC Reviewer IIlltial items in Column *c"; chlef exarntner concurrence required.

• Not applicable for NRC-prepared examinatlon outlines.

ES*201, Page 26 of 28 ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES*201*3 1. Pre*Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinaiions scheduled for the week(s) of 5" INk?

of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post*Examination To the best of my knowledge, J did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) oub..,S-/1../,1..

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) SIGNATURE (2) 1. nffp-E.Y .t/o05H 2. etii5 &liJ.?:J

6. l \ <;,.0. S'1j\i eel) ey\ 7.

8.

tYlU6. 10.

Kc;5'S.( bPS Gs 11. I. "ltv'R [,I\,' S'.i i$i 17 i i 1/51</ _'fZ-:::"'

.....O'--_-;---;;--=--->

____7..

f' ....

fi:\.C.".... IT'f tl...c:-P

,,7 13. L\-t..w::.

(::>'1111 c..k,1#I.l oP-' UJO

14. He" t...r \)e. -SO)_ ') "4>(-

15. ft..; t:....'\.,. *..('"$ . \ ...$Jl.1.J..n-NOTES: ES-201, Page 27 of 28 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of J/f{/rz-->IZI It 7.. as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post*Examination To the best of my knowledge, Idid not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of: h-f's/2.I Itt. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized bv the NRC. PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) 1.

'It: 2. ....e\ Lc..,."....c...

3.

D" Ito 4. F,.,.../t.

W"'J-!"IJO

()I'S J(.O 5. Z,iL Jet> 6.

'10\;>1., ',Sf 7.

8. j3>ilJ1/M*ti 9.0ta&S'mfWL ___-I80:!!IIJ.

_____ 1 O. ,j c h .. l:>,,,,,-,,,.. I:;>" ", e s S'&0 11. $rey E M 1,,2. "'ole..

of'!.. 12.

CHi J.N\Jrvdvv:

14. £.___ J C"'J&' 0($ :£nsh"",f..rt

..r 15. CI:\'gcs, l:l i'c;, "i:.J..

NOTES: ES-201, Page 27 of 28

---

---

Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of jas of the date of my signature, I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g" acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been t"'f1mnmmi<::",rl Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC, PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE /

DATE NOTE 1.

A.\ (bout' n 0 Pt.U.lr Q. \J c.. T () J"-.,. _ ... \2.

c:"j iii!! 6h"l! ,r . g,S,e'e PltlfbUC)C

....Ie Gr*, 4, 5, __________________________________________________________

___ 6. __________________________________________________________

___ 7, __________________________________________________________

___ 8, __________________________________________________________

___ 9, _______________________________________________________________________________

_ 11,__________________________________________________________ES-201, Page 27 of 28 Operating Test gualltY Checklist Facility:

Oyster Date of Examination:

Operating Test Number: ll-l 1. GENERAL CRITERIA The operating test conforms with the previously approved ouUlne; changes are COIl$istent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational Importance, safety function distribution). There Is no day-to-clay repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this ex.amlnation. The operating test Shall not duplicate Items from the applicants' audit tast(s)(see Section O. 1.a), OVerlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test Is within acceptable limits. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-\han-competent applicants at the designated license level. 2. WALK*THROUGH CRITERIA Each JPM Includes the foflowlng, as applicable: Initial conditions Initiating cues references and tools. Includlng associated proceduresreasonable end validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation If deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:*

• detailed expected actions with exact crltarla and nomenclature

• systam response and other examiner cues statements describing Important observations to be made by the applicant*

• criteria for successful completion of the task

• identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

-restrictions on the sequence of steps. If applicable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk*through outlines (Forms ES-SOH and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e,g., ltam distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES*201-2.

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed In accordance with Form E5-S01*4 and a copy Is attached.

Prlnfed a, Author Jeffrev b, Facility Reviewer (0) Steven 1IA;;(11JfA.

> r

,.. x.z;:,uWf.._

C, NRC Chief Examiner (#) NRC Supervisor

_I1nAlrl E. JAd<soV\ /rMJ!) -r::/I {'/ NOTE:

• The facility is not applicable for NRC-developed tests # IndeperM;lent RC NMewer inltIaIltams in Cofumn "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27 a b" ry II il r ?' II 9' I'Y' II ry t II 'l I'V'" -. .. ? 11 /1 /)' 1/ .. .. .. 1/ 'l 1" \ r. (t. sl!l!z ,

Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 er Creek Date of Exam: 5/14/2012 Scenario Numbers: 1 12.1 30perating Test Number: 11-1 NRC Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c# The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. I: 'Y (J The scenarios consist mostly of related events. J!t £E Each event description consists of

• the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

• the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the ,y

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the ry M

• the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• the event termination point (if applicable) No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. N .r' The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

y lIY Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

'1f rr If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

111 IJr 1" Cues are given. 8. The simulator modeling is not U 'Y tV The scenarios have been validated.

Pursuant to 1OCFR55.46(d), any open simulator rt 1-'performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

IN Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of '4 'Y1t1-' 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form rr 11 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

i II 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events U ! IV' II specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

¥ ., ,.. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

--1. Total malfunctions 6/6/7 (I IV""-1 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry 1/2/2 /1 .tf I 3. Abnormal events 4 I 2 I 4 1/ I'V'If 4. Majortransients 1 I 1 J 1 II rv An EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 2 / 2 " /LEOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1/1/0 'I Y Ii It 7. Critical tasks 2 / 2 I 2 11 1( 1 ES-301, Page 25 of 27 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 . Oyster Creek Date of Exam: 5/1412012 Scenario Numbers: 41 I Operating Test Number: 11-1 NRC Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c# The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. It l' IV I 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related If 11 r Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 't5'" the expected operator actions (by shift position) tv the event termination point (if applicable)

14. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario tV'II y without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

II L Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

f1 t/ Y If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. If 11 If' The simulator modeling is not altered. Ulr The scenarios have been validated.

Pursuant to 1OCFR55.46(d), any open performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated ri to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified IV" 1;All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of 'V All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

N 1f' IV Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

<< Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)

--1. Total malfunctions 7 I 1 tV'-,.$ 2. Malfunctions atter EOP entry 2 1 1 fQ Itj ,tV 3. Abnormal events 4 I I 1,1 rt tv 4. Major transients 2 1 1 11 IV 1 5. EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions 2 I I (if f)1 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions 1 1 / I'J 1; r 7. Critical tasks 2 I I fr 11]] ES-301, Page 25 of 27

Transient and Event Checklist Form Facility:

Oyster Date of Exam: 5/14/12 Operating Test Number: ILT 11-1 Scenarios A P 1 3 4 (Backup) T MP E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T NT A I C S A B S A B S A B S A B L M A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 U N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*)T P R I URX 1 1 1 0 l8J SRO-I 1 2 2 1 1 1 R01 0 3,5 3,5 6 4 4 2 SRO-U 0 MAJ 7 7 7,8 4 2 2 1 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 1 0 l8J SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 1 R02 0 IIC 4-5 4,6 4 4 4 2 SRO-U 0 MAJ 7 7 2 2 2 1 -TS 0 2 2_ RO RX 1 1 0 l8J SRO-I NOR 1 2 1 1 1 1 R03 0 IIC 4-5 3,5 6 4 4 2 SRO-U 0 MAJ 7 7,8 4 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 1 0 l8J SRO-I NOR I 1 R04 0 I IIC 3,5 SRO-U 0 MAJ 7 TS Instructions:

-Check the a-fglicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event tyrae; are not for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and Aba ance-of-f,ant (8 pr positions.

Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at leas two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC gosition.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited oward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section .5.d) ut must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. Q Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component mal nctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicanfs count toward the mimmum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in e right-hand columns. ES-301, Page 26 of 27 ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form Facility:

Oyster Creek Date of Exam: 5/14112 Operating Test Number: ILT R05 SROl1 SROl2 SROl3 ScenariosA E P 1 3 4 T M P E 0 L N CREW CREW CREW CREW POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T NT A C S A B S A B S A B S A B L M A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 U N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*)T P R I U E RO 1 1 1 SRO-I 1 1 1 0 IIC 4-5 4 4 4 0 MAJ 7 7 2 2 2 TS 0 0 2 RO 0 RX 2 2 1 1 I t=F=f, SRO-I NOR 1 1 1 10 4 4 o 7.8 4 2 2 ---GY 4-5 4 0 2 RO RX 2 2 3 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 2 1 1 IIC 3-6 3-6 10 4 4 0 MAJ 7 7 7.8 4 2 2 TS 4-5 4 0 2 RO 2 2 1 1 C+/-=0 SRO-I 1 2 2 1 1 IIC 3.6 3.5 8 4 4 0 MAJ 7 7 7.8 4 2 2 4.6 EEE=Z Instructions: Check the level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for event are not for RO applicants.

ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls and "ba ance-of-rlant (B pr positions.

Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC including at leas two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the gosmon. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be oward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position. ReactiVito manipulations ma¥ be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer Section .5.d) but must be Significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. r) Reactivity and evolutions may be replaced With additional instrument or component rna unctions on a 1-for-1 Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's com/hetence count the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in e right-hand ES-301, Page 26 of ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility:

Oyster Date of Exam: 5/14/12 Operating Test Number: IL T ScenariosA E p 1 3 4 T M P E 0 L N CREW CREW CREW CREW POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T NT A C S A B S A B S A B S A B L MA T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 U N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P M(*)T P R I U E RO RX 2 2 1 1 0 SRO-I 1 1 2 1 1 0 IIC 3-6 8 4 4 [gI MAJ 7 7 2 2 2 TS 4-5 4 0 2 RO 1 1 1 1 0 SRO-I 2 1 1 1 SROU2 0 4 4 [gI MAJ 7,8 2 2 2 4,6 2 0 2 RX 1 1 NOR 1 1 0 SRO-I 4 4 0 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 0 0 2 RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 4 4 0 SRO-U 2 2 0 0 2 Instructions: Check the applicant level and enter the operatinB test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not aPaPlicable for RO applicants. R s must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-p ant (BOP)" pOSitions.

Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, at least two instrument or component malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC If an Ins ant SRO additionally serves in the BO position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward t e two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC pOSition.

manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section .5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. r> Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced With additional instrument or component ma unctions on a 1-for-1 basis. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that rl?<l.uire verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns. ES-301, Page 26 of ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility:

Oyster Creek Date of Examination:

5/14/2012 Operating Test No.: 11-1 NRC RO-1 RO-2&4 APPLICANTS RO-3&5 RO RO RO RO D Competencies SRO-I SRO-U D D SRO-I SRO-U D D SRO-I SRO-U D D SRO-I SRO-U D SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret}

Diagnose 4-6 4-13 3,5, 3-8 3,5-13 4-6 4-8 7-9 Events and Conditions 2-3,5, Comply With and Use 1,4-8 2.,4-13 2-8 1,3, 1,4-8 2,4-8 7-9 5-8 Procedures (1) Operate Control 1,4-8 2.,4-8 2-h 5 , 2-4,6-13 1'.(-8 5 , 1,4-8 2,4-8 Boards (2) Communicate 2-3,5, 1,3, 1. 4-8 2.,4-8 2-S 1,4-8 2,4-S 7-9 5-8 and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech Specs. (3) Notes: (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility:

Oyster Creek Date of Examination:

5/14/2012 Operating Test No.: 11-1 NRC SROI-1 SROI-2 APPLICANTS SROU-1&2 RO 0 RO 0 RO 0 RO 0 Competencies SRO-I SRO-U [gJ 0 SRO-I SRO-U [gJ 0 SRO-I SRO-U 0 [gJ SRO-I SRO-U 0 0 SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret!

Diagnose 3-8 3-8 4,6-9 3-8 3,5-8 3-9 3-8 3,8 Events and Conditions Comply With and Use 1-8 1-8 1,4, 2-8 1,3, 1-9 1-8 '[-8 6-9 5-8 Procedures (1) Operate Control 1,4, 2-4,6-8 1,3,5, 6-9 7-8 Boards (2) Communicate 1,4, 1,3, 1-8 1-8 2-8 1-9 '-8 'i-8 6-9 5-8 and Interact Demonstrate 1-8 1-8 1-9 1-8 1-8 Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and 4-5 4-5 4,6 4-5 4-5 Use Tech Specs. (3) Notes: (1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility:

Oyster Creek Date of Exam: 5/14/2012 Exam Level: RO 181 SRO 181 Initial Item a b* c' Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

It! 1) (7/ a NRC KlAB are referenced for all questions. t;y tV b. FaclUty learning Objectives are referenced es available. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance wtth Section D.2.d of ES-401 t"; /}""The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were -repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exam, consult the NRR OL program

-Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears

_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was sterted; or II _ the examinations were developed independentfy; rY x.. the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; _ other Modified NewBank use meets limits (no more than 75 from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest or modified);

enter the actual RO I SRO-only question 43112 13/7 19/6 {( 1 dlstributlon(S) at Memorv CIABetween 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the exam are written at the comprehension lanalysis the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent If the 32/4 43121 II II{ tY selected KAs support the higher cognitive levels; the actual RO I SRO question distrlbution(s) at Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers r II or aid in the elimination of 15 Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved outline and Is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned;

/I deviations are Justified Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines In ES Appendix B. 1/ 1; The exam contains the required number of one-point.

multiple choice items; II 11 t7 the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Name I Date a. Jeffrev Ridash .!L...!'c77" b. FaclUty Reviewer (0) Steven

..; 2'l Y!1 ,.J r:7."/jO / l/L." 7./1.c. NRC Chief Examiner (II) d. NRC Regional Supervisor .

ltVU !>rfiZJff:

• The facility reviewer's Initials/Signature are not applicable for NRC-davel""""" -'rninations

/I Independent NRC reviewer Initial items In Column *c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401, Page 29 of 33 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Date of Exam: 5/24/2012 Item Description Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations) Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature

a. Jeffre Ridosh b. Facility Reviewer(*)

Steven Johnston c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)

d. NRC Supervisor(*)

a /4 11 'Y r ?II 1{ r fi 1:5 7 II l' II 0/ Date .r/1..7h z. {2-7111.. 'IrLz

(*) The facility reviewer's Signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5