ML19332D349

NPDES Noncompliance Rept for Third Quarter 1989

ML19332D349
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	11/21/1989
From:	Hairston W ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 8912010049
Download: ML19332D349 (2)

Text

y r

'r

[h , [/ -

p. , y;: ., , jj Alabama Power Company

^ ~

ps. 40 inverness Cent:r ParkwIy .

, 4  %'

'i'~

Post Office Box 1293 b;.c$1 Dirmingham, Alabama 3$201 P ' . Telephone 205 868 5581

- W. G. Hairston,111 -

S6nior Vice President Nuclear Operations ggg gg .

!ho souttern electic systern.

November 21, 1989 1 y

[

P Docket Nos. 50-348'

'50-364- .

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:- Document Control Desk P Washington, D.-C. 20555 ,

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Ouarterly NPDES Noncomoliance Report '

1 Gentlemen:

Enclosed in accordance with Subsection 3.2 of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear P1 ant Environmental Protection Plan (Units .I and 2), Appendix B to facility ';

10perating-License Nos.:NPF-2 and NPF-8, is a summary of NPDES inoncompliances for the _ third quarter of 1989 as transmitted to the Alabama. ,

Department of Environmental Management.

.If you have any. questions, please advise.

Respectfully submitted, W ' lb W. G..Hairston,Illi d h

WGH,III/TCM Enclosure  :

cc: Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. E. A. Reeves Mr. G. F.-Maxwell f6 I,

, l 8912010049 891121 JDR ADOCK'05000g8

W - -

= , . - . . ." .

"'?

<~K' --v..y.-~g , ,. .p. .,,_ __,_ _ _

• - ~

' - This tab 12-is submitted t;> fclfill requirements of Part l.d.f;-and Part Ill.J, ll

- ~ -

..... ;C

,FARLEY NUCLLAR PLANT'ALOO2461). ,

a-. . -

a Test Period 'of Noncompilaac Per1mit ~. Analytical. Cause of- .

Began _ Ended *-

' Noncompliance- ' Corrective Measures _ Date

' Parameter Limit- Value Discharge Point -

7/14/89 '7/12/89 7/12/89(I)

Serage Plant 2B. Fecal 300 org/100 ml 1,970 org/100 mic No specific cause ' 'No specific action was taken to correct this,- - .j Coliform could be deter-

. (DSN0ll) - mined. . Operating. since a specific cause logs were re- could not be identified.

viewed with no in-dication of a chan-ical or operational

. problems.~ Review -

of daily chlorine

- data indicated ade-quate levels of FAC vere present each

day of that week.

Sampling and analytical procedures

-were reviewed and -

quality control was acceptable.

s (1) Indicates date effluent should have returned within permit Ilmits.

c .

.6.r_ _, _,

hh,__-

- ~ ~

m' ~ r~.-rwy . . _ , . , , _