ML19332D349

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NPDES Noncompliance Rept for Third Quarter 1989
ML19332D349
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/21/1989
From: Hairston W
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 8912010049
Download: ML19332D349 (2)


Text

y r

'r

[h

[/ -

p.

, y;:.,, jj Alabama Power Company

^

~

ps.

40 inverness Cent:r ParkwIy.

Post Office Box 1293 4

b;.c$1 Dirmingham, Alabama 3$201

'i'~

. Telephone 205 868 5581 P '

- W. G. Hairston,111 -

S6nior Vice President Nuclear Operations ggg gg.

!ho souttern electic systern.

November 21, 1989 1

y

[

P Docket Nos.

50-348'

'50-364-U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:- Document Control Desk P

Washington, D.-C.

20555 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Ouarterly NPDES Noncomoliance Report 1

Gentlemen:

Enclosed in accordance with Subsection 3.2 of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear P1 ant Environmental Protection Plan (Units.I and 2), Appendix B to facility 10perating-License Nos.:NPF-2 and NPF-8, is a summary of NPDES inoncompliances for the _ third quarter of 1989 as transmitted to the Alabama.

Department of Environmental Management.

.If you have any. questions, please advise.

Respectfully submitted, W

' lb h

W. G..Hairston,Illi d

WGH,III/TCM Enclosure cc: Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. E. A. Reeves Mr. G. F.-Maxwell f6 I, l 8912010049 891121 JDR ADOCK'05000g8

W

=

"'?

<~K'

--v..y.-~g

.p.

' - This tab 12-is submitted t;> fclfill requirements of Part l.d.f;-and Part Ill.J,

C ll

~

,FARLEY NUCLLAR PLANT'ALOO2461).

- ~ -

a-.

a Per1mit

~. Analytical.

Cause of-Test Period 'of Noncompilaac Discharge Point -

' Parameter Limit-Value

' Noncompliance-

' Corrective Measures _

Date Began _

Ended Serage Plant 2B.

Fecal 300 org/100 ml 1,970 org/100 mic No specific cause ' No specific action was 7/14/89

'7/12/89 7/12/89(I) could be deter-

' taken to correct this,-

.j

. (DSN0ll) -

Coliform mined.. Operating. since a specific cause logs were re-could not be identified.

viewed with no in-dication of a chan-ical or operational

. problems.~ Review of daily chlorine

- data indicated ade-quate levels of FAC vere present each day of that week.

Sampling and analytical procedures

-were reviewed and quality control was acceptable.

s (1) Indicates date effluent should have returned within permit Ilmits.

c

- ~ ~

hh,__-

.6.r_

m'

~

r~.-rwy

_