ML110460119: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000326/2010201]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNIVERSITY  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE BERKELEY -DAVIS -IRVINE -LOS ANGELES -MERCED -RIVERSIDE
OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE BERKELEY -DAVIS -IRVINE -LOS ANGELES -MERCED -RIVERSIDE  
* SAN DIEGO
* SAN DIEGO * SAN FRANCISCO  
* SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA. SANTACRUZ Office of the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost 509 Aldrich Hall Irvine, CA 92697-1000 (949)824-6296 (949)824-2438 FAX February 2, 2011 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555  
SANTA BARBARA. SANTACRUZ Office of the Executive  
 
Vice Chancellor  
==References:==
and Provost 509 Aldrich Hall Irvine, CA 92697-1000
 
(949)824-6296
Docket 50-326. License R-1 16 UC Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility NRC Inspection Report 50-326/2010-201 Notice of Violation We are pleased that the recent inspection report cited concluded that our operation of the nuclear research reactor was generally found acceptable and within compliance.
(949)824-2438  
In one area your inspectors determined a violation of regulations had occurred: "Contrary to Section 10.2 "Drills and Exercises" of the Emergency Plan for the University of California, Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility, the licensee failed to conduct the required annual onsite emergency drill; the last record for an on-site drill was in 2007." As requested, we respond to the Notice of Violation as follows.1. Discussion of Violation.
FAX February 2, 2011 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
We regret that this has been seen as a violation of regulations or of our plan. Further we are concerned that this is seen as a "more than minor safety significance", since we believe firmly that adequate emergency response continues to be assured.Annual training exercises for response personnel were conducted with the objective of assuring appropriate emergency response to a radiologically related emergency at the facility.
Commission
As explained below we are convinced our response team is adequately prepared to meet anticipated emergency incidents at the facility even though the exercise was conducted at an on-campus location that was not within the confines of the reactor facility itself. Records of these exercises were made available to your inspectors.
ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 References:  
The University of California Irvine (UCI) maintains a comprehensive emergency response plan designed to provide effective 24/7 response by trained personnel to emergencies or disasters anywhere on campus.Rapidly available support is provided from off-campus
Docket 50-326. License R-1 16 UC Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility NRC Inspection  
("off-site")
Report 50-326/2010-201  
personnel (including Orange County Fire Authority, Irvine and Newport Beach Police Departments).
Notice of Violation We are pleased that the recent inspection  
The plan anticipates the use of other specialized groups to assist, when necessary, especially with clean-up and recovery operations.
report cited concluded  
This is detailed in our ERT Response Plan "Red Book" that was made available to inspectors.
that our operation  
A sub-group of ERT is highly experienced and trained to handle emergencies with potential radiological impact since these could occur at a large number of sites on campus only one of which is the nuclear reactor laboratory.
of the nuclear research reactor was generally  
This group is familiar through frequent visits and through membership on the Reactor Operations Conmmittee (ROC), with the detailed specifics of the facility.
found acceptable  
Training emphasizes that these ,I/&
and within compliance.  
21Page NRC Inspection Report 50-326/2010-201 Notice of Violation February 3, 2011 individuals will provide guidance to other responding personnel entering the reactor or other laboratory facilities where radioisotopes are used.Training and practice may therefore occur at a number of locations.
In one area your inspectors
Suitable locations are selected based on incident likelihood, space available for the size of the group to be trained, and the availability of facilities for table-top exercises (seemingly now favored for better rehearsing responses).
determined  
The nuclear reactor facility has not always been favored since its space is quite restricted and it has no conference accommodation.
a violation  
The reactor staff itself is extremely small at our facility and relies on the rapid and properly equipped support from the ERT for effective action in the event of any incident needing emergency response.We would further comment on the specific language concerning "on-site".
of regulations  
The licensee of the UCI nuclear reactor is the "Regents of the University of California".
had occurred: "Contrary  
They have designated responsibility to the Irvine campus Chancellor, with further designation to the Executive Vice-Chancellor and Provost. These individuals have the authority, in an emergency, to declare the entire campus, including all facilities and access roads, "closed" and to direct all emergency operations therein. Thus it is not unreasonable for us to have interpreted "onsite" to imply "the Irvine campus" and to plan exercises and drills based on our campus-wide approach to emergency response.
to Section 10.2 "Drills and Exercises" of the Emergency  
We perhaps should consider modifying the language in our reactor facility emergency plan to clarify this approach.2. Corrective Steps Taken We have noted the concerns and will, pending a re-interpretation as noted above, assure that an emergency exercise/drill be conducted annually within the confines of Rowland Hall at the reactor facility.
Plan for the University  
Planning personnel will design and designate this as the "site".3. Further Corrective Steps We believe that our commitment to this change needs no further corrective action.4. Full Compliance We will implement this exercise on our normal schedule, which is during the first half of the calendar year 2011, so it should be completed by June 3 0 th of this year. The previous exercise on campus (which did not meet your on-site criterion) was held in May 2010. Subsequent exercises will be conducted each year on this schedule.Sincerely Michael R. Gottfredson Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost C: Mr. Greg Schoenbeck, NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mr. Craig Bassett, NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dean Ken Janda, UCI School of Physical Sciences Members, UCI Reactor Operations Committee}}
of California, Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility, the licensee failed to conduct the required annual onsite emergency  
drill; the last record for an on-site drill was in 2007." As requested, we respond to the Notice of Violation  
as follows.1. Discussion  
of Violation.
We regret that this has been seen as a violation  
of regulations  
or of our plan. Further we are concerned that this is seen as a "more than minor safety significance", since we believe firmly that adequate emergency  
response continues  
to be assured.Annual training exercises  
for response personnel  
were conducted  
with the objective  
of assuring appropriate  
emergency  
response to a radiologically  
related emergency  
at the facility.  
As explained  
below we are convinced  
our response team is adequately  
prepared to meet anticipated  
emergency  
incidents  
at the facility even though the exercise was conducted  
at an on-campus  
location that was not within the confines of the reactor facility itself. Records of these exercises  
were made available  
to your inspectors.
The University  
of California  
Irvine (UCI) maintains  
a comprehensive  
emergency  
response plan designed to provide effective  
24/7 response by trained personnel  
to emergencies  
or disasters  
anywhere on campus.Rapidly available  
support is provided from off-campus  
("off-site")  
personnel (including  
Orange County Fire Authority, Irvine and Newport Beach Police Departments).  
The plan anticipates  
the use of other specialized  
groups to assist, when necessary, especially  
with clean-up and recovery operations.  
This is detailed in our ERT Response Plan "Red Book" that was made available  
to inspectors.  
A sub-group  
of ERT is highly experienced  
and trained to handle emergencies  
with potential  
radiological  
impact since these could occur at a large number of sites on campus only one of which is the nuclear reactor laboratory.  
This group is familiar through frequent visits and through membership  
on the Reactor Operations  
Conmmittee (ROC), with the detailed specifics  
of the facility.  
Training emphasizes  
that these ,I/&  
21Page NRC Inspection  
Report 50-326/2010-201  
Notice of Violation February 3, 2011 individuals  
will provide guidance to other responding  
personnel  
entering the reactor or other laboratory
facilities  
where radioisotopes  
are used.Training and practice may therefore  
occur at a number of locations.  
Suitable locations  
are selected based on incident likelihood, space available  
for the size of the group to be trained, and the availability  
of facilities  
for table-top  
exercises (seemingly  
now favored for better rehearsing  
responses).  
The nuclear reactor facility has not always been favored since its space is quite restricted  
and it has no conference
accommodation.
The reactor staff itself is extremely  
small at our facility and relies on the rapid and properly equipped support from the ERT for effective  
action in the event of any incident needing emergency  
response.We would further comment on the specific language concerning "on-site".  
The licensee of the UCI nuclear reactor is the "Regents of the University  
of California".  
They have designated  
responsibility  
to the Irvine campus Chancellor, with further designation  
to the Executive  
Vice-Chancellor  
and Provost. These individuals  
have the authority, in an emergency, to declare the entire campus, including  
all facilities  
and access roads, "closed" and to direct all emergency  
operations  
therein. Thus it is not unreasonable  
for us to have interpreted "onsite" to imply "the Irvine campus" and to plan exercises  
and drills based on our campus-wide  
approach to emergency  
response.  
We perhaps should consider modifying  
the language in our reactor facility emergency  
plan to clarify this approach.2. Corrective  
Steps Taken We have noted the concerns and will, pending a re-interpretation  
as noted above, assure that an emergency  
exercise/drill  
be conducted  
annually within the confines of Rowland Hall at the reactor facility.  
Planning personnel  
will design and designate  
this as the "site".3. Further Corrective  
Steps We believe that our commitment  
to this change needs no further corrective  
action.4. Full Compliance
We will implement  
this exercise on our normal schedule, which is during the first half of the calendar year 2011, so it should be completed  
by June 3 0 th of this year. The previous exercise on campus (which did not meet your on-site criterion)  
was held in May 2010. Subsequent  
exercises  
will be conducted  
each year on this schedule.Sincerely Michael R. Gottfredson
Executive  
Vice Chancellor  
and Provost C: Mr. Greg Schoenbeck, NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Mr. Craig Bassett, NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Dean Ken Janda, UCI School of Physical Sciences Members, UCI Reactor Operations  
Committee
}}

Revision as of 08:34, 20 August 2019

UC Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility - Response to NRC Inspection Report 50-326-10-201 Notice of Violation
ML110460119
Person / Time
Site: University of California - Irvine
Issue date: 02/02/2011
From: Gottfredson M
University of California - Irvine
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
IR-10-201
Download: ML110460119 (2)


Text

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE BERKELEY -DAVIS -IRVINE -LOS ANGELES -MERCED -RIVERSIDE

  • SAN DIEGO
  • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA. SANTACRUZ Office of the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost 509 Aldrich Hall Irvine, CA 92697-1000 (949)824-6296 (949)824-2438 FAX February 2, 2011 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

References:

Docket 50-326. License R-1 16 UC Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility NRC Inspection Report 50-326/2010-201 Notice of Violation We are pleased that the recent inspection report cited concluded that our operation of the nuclear research reactor was generally found acceptable and within compliance.

In one area your inspectors determined a violation of regulations had occurred: "Contrary to Section 10.2 "Drills and Exercises" of the Emergency Plan for the University of California, Irvine Nuclear Reactor Facility, the licensee failed to conduct the required annual onsite emergency drill; the last record for an on-site drill was in 2007." As requested, we respond to the Notice of Violation as follows.1. Discussion of Violation.

We regret that this has been seen as a violation of regulations or of our plan. Further we are concerned that this is seen as a "more than minor safety significance", since we believe firmly that adequate emergency response continues to be assured.Annual training exercises for response personnel were conducted with the objective of assuring appropriate emergency response to a radiologically related emergency at the facility.

As explained below we are convinced our response team is adequately prepared to meet anticipated emergency incidents at the facility even though the exercise was conducted at an on-campus location that was not within the confines of the reactor facility itself. Records of these exercises were made available to your inspectors.

The University of California Irvine (UCI) maintains a comprehensive emergency response plan designed to provide effective 24/7 response by trained personnel to emergencies or disasters anywhere on campus.Rapidly available support is provided from off-campus

("off-site")

personnel (including Orange County Fire Authority, Irvine and Newport Beach Police Departments).

The plan anticipates the use of other specialized groups to assist, when necessary, especially with clean-up and recovery operations.

This is detailed in our ERT Response Plan "Red Book" that was made available to inspectors.

A sub-group of ERT is highly experienced and trained to handle emergencies with potential radiological impact since these could occur at a large number of sites on campus only one of which is the nuclear reactor laboratory.

This group is familiar through frequent visits and through membership on the Reactor Operations Conmmittee (ROC), with the detailed specifics of the facility.

Training emphasizes that these ,I/&

21Page NRC Inspection Report 50-326/2010-201 Notice of Violation February 3, 2011 individuals will provide guidance to other responding personnel entering the reactor or other laboratory facilities where radioisotopes are used.Training and practice may therefore occur at a number of locations.

Suitable locations are selected based on incident likelihood, space available for the size of the group to be trained, and the availability of facilities for table-top exercises (seemingly now favored for better rehearsing responses).

The nuclear reactor facility has not always been favored since its space is quite restricted and it has no conference accommodation.

The reactor staff itself is extremely small at our facility and relies on the rapid and properly equipped support from the ERT for effective action in the event of any incident needing emergency response.We would further comment on the specific language concerning "on-site".

The licensee of the UCI nuclear reactor is the "Regents of the University of California".

They have designated responsibility to the Irvine campus Chancellor, with further designation to the Executive Vice-Chancellor and Provost. These individuals have the authority, in an emergency, to declare the entire campus, including all facilities and access roads, "closed" and to direct all emergency operations therein. Thus it is not unreasonable for us to have interpreted "onsite" to imply "the Irvine campus" and to plan exercises and drills based on our campus-wide approach to emergency response.

We perhaps should consider modifying the language in our reactor facility emergency plan to clarify this approach.2. Corrective Steps Taken We have noted the concerns and will, pending a re-interpretation as noted above, assure that an emergency exercise/drill be conducted annually within the confines of Rowland Hall at the reactor facility.

Planning personnel will design and designate this as the "site".3. Further Corrective Steps We believe that our commitment to this change needs no further corrective action.4. Full Compliance We will implement this exercise on our normal schedule, which is during the first half of the calendar year 2011, so it should be completed by June 3 0 th of this year. The previous exercise on campus (which did not meet your on-site criterion) was held in May 2010. Subsequent exercises will be conducted each year on this schedule.Sincerely Michael R. Gottfredson Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost C: Mr. Greg Schoenbeck, NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mr. Craig Bassett, NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dean Ken Janda, UCI School of Physical Sciences Members, UCI Reactor Operations Committee