ML090130072: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 12/08/2008
| issue date = 12/08/2008
| title = Email Additional Augmentation SE Items
| title = Email Additional Augmentation SE Items
| author name = Norris M B
| author name = Norris M
| author affiliation = NRC/NSIR
| author affiliation = NRC/NSIR
| addressee name = Kalyanam N K
| addressee name = Kalyanam N
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| docket = 05000361, 05000362
| docket = 05000361, 05000362
Line 22: Line 22:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Additional Augmentation SE items I agree with #2, but I have issue with 1 and 3.  
RE: Additional Augmentation SE items I agree with #2, but I have issue with 1 and 3.
: 1. The second paragraph on SE page five under "Offsite Dose Assessment" states, "Three additional personnel with senior HP expertise will assume responsibility for offsite dose assessment and projections upon arrival at the TSC and EOF."  The first paragraph is technically true and the second paragraph discusses the transfer of responsibility of the dose assessment.  
: 1. The second paragraph on SE page five under "Offsite Dose Assessment" states, "Three additional personnel with senior HP expertise will assume responsibility for offsite dose assessment and projections upon arrival at the TSC and EOF."  The first paragraph is technically true and the second paragraph discusses the transfer of responsibility of the dose assessment.
: 3. Page 15 of 20 in Attachment 1 to the original application states, "The HP Supervisor maintains the responsibility for the dose assessment activity until it is turned over to HP personnel in the TSC or EOF."  In addition, Enclosure 1, Attachment 3, page 2 of the 9/24/08 response states, "Thirty (30) minute offsite dose assessment is the responsibility of the on-shift HP Supervisor until it is turned over to HP personnel in the TSC or the EOF."  I don't see any reference to the OSC in these documents.  
: 3. Page 15 of 20 in Attachment 1 to the original application states, "The HP Supervisor maintains the responsibility for the dose assessment activity until it is turned over to HP personnel in the TSC or EOF."  In addition, Enclosure 1, Attachment 3, page 2 of the 9/24/08 response states, "Thirty (30) minute offsite dose assessment is the responsibility of the on-shift HP Supervisor until it is turned over to HP personnel in the TSC or the EOF."  I don't see any reference to the OSC in these documents.  



Revision as of 03:31, 12 July 2019

Email Additional Augmentation SE Items
ML090130072
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/08/2008
From: Mike Norris
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
To: Kalyanam N
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
Kalyanam N, NRR/DLPM, 415-1480
Shared Package
ML090120818 List:
References
TAC MD5837, TAC MD5838
Download: ML090130072 (2)


Text

From: Michael Norris Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 9:27 AM To: Kaly Kalyanam

Subject:

RE: Additional Augmentation SE items I agree with #2, but I have issue with 1 and 3.

1. The second paragraph on SE page five under "Offsite Dose Assessment" states, "Three additional personnel with senior HP expertise will assume responsibility for offsite dose assessment and projections upon arrival at the TSC and EOF." The first paragraph is technically true and the second paragraph discusses the transfer of responsibility of the dose assessment.
3. Page 15 of 20 in Attachment 1 to the original application states, "The HP Supervisor maintains the responsibility for the dose assessment activity until it is turned over to HP personnel in the TSC or EOF." In addition, Enclosure 1, Attachment 3, page 2 of the 9/24/08 response states, "Thirty (30) minute offsite dose assessment is the responsibility of the on-shift HP Supervisor until it is turned over to HP personnel in the TSC or the EOF." I don't see any reference to the OSC in these documents.

We should change the number as reflected in #2 from 23 to 24 on page 4 of the SE, 1st paragraph, but let the rest as writeen.

Mike From: Kaly Kalyanam Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:41 PM To: Michael Norris

Subject:

FW: Additional Augmentation SE items Some additional changes.

Kaly From: Linda.Conklin@sce.com [1] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:40 PM To: Kaly Kalyanam

Subject:

Additional Augmentation SE items We've identified some additional minor corrections for the SE. If you issue another SE these should also be addressed.

Linda T. Conklin Manager, Plant Licensing Office 949 368-9443 Fax 949-368-7575

                                                          • This communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this communication.

Forwarded by LINDA CONKLIN/SONGS/SCE/EIX on 12/04/2008 10:38 AM -----

MARK MORGAN/SONGS/SCE/EIX 12/04/2008 09:51 AM ToLINDA CONKLIN/SONGS/SCE/EIX cc SubjectAdditional Augmentation SE items Linda, There are three additional items that we would like to raise with the NRC regarding the Augmentation Time Safety Evaluation. None of these are as significant as the issue of when to start the 90 minute clock. Please pass these along to Kaly.

Thanks, Mark 86745 1. On page 5 of the SE, the first paragraph under "Offsite Dose Assessment" states that, "The proposed revision provides one on-shift senior HP expert and three additional experts within 90 minutes." While this statement is technically true it does not reflect that, as described in Enclosure 1, Attachment 3, page 2 of our 9/24/08 RAI response, the on-shift HP Supervisor gives up his Offsite Dose Assessment responsibilities upon arrival of the augmented personnel. The on-shift HP Supervisor remains available, but focused on other duties, following augmentation. This is why in Enclosure 1, Attachment 2, page 2 of our 9/24/08 RAI response, we state that there are a total of 3 personnel available at 90 minutes, and that they are the 3 augmented personnel.

2. On page 4 of the SE, 1st paragraph, the SE states that SCE's, "on-shift staffing of 23 members..." is greater than the 10 staff members identified in Table B-1. 23 on-shift personnel was from our original request, but that number changed to 24 in our letter dated 9/24/08 (see Enclosure 1, Attachments 1 and 2 of the 9/24/08 RAI response).
3. On page 5 of the SE, 2nd paragraph under "Offsite Dose Assessment," last sentence. The three additional personnel with senior HP expertise report to the TSC, OSC, and the EOF (not just the TSC and the EOF). E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (21707AE0BEC04F4BB5502E2483D69D6A1F03669F1F)

Subject:

RE: Additional Augmentation SE items Sent Date: 12/8/2008 9:27:11 AM Received Date: 12/8/2008 9:27:11 AM From: Michael Norris

Created By: Michael.Norris@nrc.gov

Recipients:

Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov (Kaly Kalyanam) Tracking Status: None

Post Office:

HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time

MESSAGE 14135 12/8/2008

Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False

Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: