ML18023A660: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/8/18 4:24 PM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pd-ebwi Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities. Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0024 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 --Submitter Information (?~ tt!J-'r-{( 5;2 9~t/ Name: Colleen Choi II /15) ")tJ/ 7 General Comment I request the window for public comment be extended as the public was not given reasonable notification to review the document and comment. As Southern California Edison received a license from the California Coastal Commission to bury 3.55 million pounds of radioactive nuclear waste, 108 feet from the ocean,,near an earthquake fault, in a tsunami zone, at the water table -something has fallen through the cracks of your evaluation processes and
{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/8/18 4:24 PM Received:
* procedures. As I live within 50 miles of the plume zone, I ask that this license be revoked, that the nuclear waste be put in safer canisters, and moved to a safer location. The 5/8" walled canisters are said to last 25 years, which is not enough time. We need to make a plan that ~ill keep our next 7 generations safe ... not 25 years. Please make decisions to protect our planet and humanity. SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM _ 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add--* -.Jer,v,eJ/5111tl-'1. l.JC<56") https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d8f9ae&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018
January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pd-ebwi Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities.
}}
Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document:
NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0024 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734  
--Submitter Information  
(?~ tt!J-'r-{( 5;2 9~t/ Name: Colleen Choi II /15) ")tJ/ 7 General Comment I request the window for public comment be extended as the public was not given reasonable notification to review the document and comment. As Southern California Edison received a license from the California Coastal Commission to bury 3.55 million pounds of radioactive nuclear waste, 108 feet from the ocean,,near an earthquake fault, in a tsunami zone, at the water table -something has fallen through the cracks of your evaluation processes and
* procedures.
As I live within 50 miles of the plume zone, I ask that this license be revoked, that the nuclear waste be put in safer canisters, and moved to a safer location.
The 5/8" walled canisters are said to last 25 years, which is not enough time. We need to make a plan that ~ill keep our next 7 generations safe ... not 25 years. Please make decisions to protect our planet and humanity.
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM _ 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add--* -.Jer,v,eJ/5111tl-'1.
l.JC<56")
https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/
getcontent?objectld=0900006482d8f9ae&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018}}

Latest revision as of 04:18, 6 July 2018

Comment (23) of Colleen Choi Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18023A660
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/2018
From: Choi C
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00023, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18023A660 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/8/18 4:24 PM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pd-ebwi Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities. Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0024 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 --Submitter Information (?~ tt!J-'r-{( 5;2 9~t/ Name: Colleen Choi II /15) ")tJ/ 7 General Comment I request the window for public comment be extended as the public was not given reasonable notification to review the document and comment. As Southern California Edison received a license from the California Coastal Commission to bury 3.55 million pounds of radioactive nuclear waste, 108 feet from the ocean,,near an earthquake fault, in a tsunami zone, at the water table -something has fallen through the cracks of your evaluation processes and

  • procedures.

As I live within 50 miles of the plume zone, I ask that this license be revoked, that the nuclear waste be put in safer canisters, and moved to a safer location. The 5/8" walled canisters are said to last 25 years, which is not enough time. We need to make a plan that ~ill keep our next 7 generations safe ... not 25 years. Please make decisions to protect our planet and humanity. SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM _ 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add--* -.Jer,v,eJ/5111tl-'1. l.JC<56") https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d8f9ae&format=xml&showorig=false 01/08/2018}}