ML16257A646: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/01/2016
| issue date = 09/01/2016
| title = Email - Acceptance Review Farley, Hatch & Vogtle TSTF 545 & Omn 20
| title = Email - Acceptance Review Farley, Hatch & Vogtle TSTF 545 & Omn 20
| author name = Martin R E
| author name = Martin R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Pierce C R
| addressee name = Pierce C
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| docket = 05000321, 05000348, 05000364, 05000366, 05000424, 05000425
| docket = 05000321, 05000348, 05000364, 05000366, 05000424, 05000425
| license number = DPR-057, NPF-002, NPF-005, NPF-008, NPF-068, NPF-081
| license number = DPR-057, NPF-002, NPF-005, NPF-008, NPF-068, NPF-081
| contact person = Martin R E, NRR/DORL/LPLII-1, 415-1493
| contact person = Martin R, NRR/DORL/LPLII-1, 415-1493
| case reference number = CAC MF8176, CAC MF8177, CAC MF8178, CAC MF8179, CAC MF8180, CAC MF8181, CAC MF8210, CAC MF8211, CAC MF8212, CAC MF8213
| case reference number = CAC MF8176, CAC MF8177, CAC MF8178, CAC MF8179, CAC MF8180, CAC MF8181, CAC MF8210, CAC MF8211, CAC MF8212, CAC MF8213
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project = CAC:MF8176, CAC:MF8177, CAC:MF8178, CAC:MF8179, CAC:MF8180, CAC:MF8181, CAC:MF8210, CAC:MF8211, CAC:MF8212, CAC:MF8213
| project = CAC:MF8176, CAC:MF8177, CAC:MF8178, CAC:MF8179, CAC:MF8180, CAC:MF8181, CAC:MF8210, CAC:MF8211, CAC:MF8212, CAC:MF8213
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Martin, Robert Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 8:04 AM To: 'crpierce@southernco.com' <crpierce@southernco.com> Cc: 'McElroy, G. Ken' <GKMCELRO@southernco.com> Subject: Acceptance Review - TSTF 545 for SNC Plants On July 28, 2016, Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC) submitted a License Amendment Request (LAR) (ADAMS ML16214A252) for Farley, Hatch and Vogtle, Units 1 and 2, to Revise Technical Specifications (TS) to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS lnservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing." and for Farley and Vogtle, Units 1 and 2, also submitted a proposed Alternative to the ASME Cod The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)staff's acceptance review of these licensing actions. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plan Regarding the LAR portion of the submittal, consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including TS) must fully describe the changes requested, and following, as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety consideration Regarding the proposed Alternative, pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safet The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondenc Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364; 50-321 and 50-366; 50-424 and 50-425 CAC Nos MF8176 - MF8181 and MF8210 - MF8213}}
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Martin, Robert Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 8:04 AM To: 'crpierce@southernco.com' <crpierce@southernco.com>
Cc: 'McElroy, G. Ken' <GKMCELRO@southernco.com>
 
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review - TSTF 545 for SNC Plants On July 28, 2016, Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC) submitted a License Amendment Request (LAR) (ADAMS ML16214A252) for Farley, Hatch and Vogtle, Units 1 and 2, to Revise Technical Specifications (TS) to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS lnservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing." and for Farley and Vogtle, Units 1 and 2, also submitted a proposed Alternative to the ASME Code. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of these licensing actions. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Regarding the LAR portion of the submittal, consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including TS) must fully describe the changes requested, and following, as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
Regarding the proposed Alternative, pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364; 50-321 and 50-366; 50-424 and 50-425 CAC Nos MF8176 - MF8181 and MF8210 - MF8213}}

Latest revision as of 14:14, 30 October 2019

Email - Acceptance Review Farley, Hatch & Vogtle TSTF 545 & Omn 20
ML16257A646
Person / Time
Site: Hatch, Vogtle, Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 09/01/2016
From: Martin R
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Pierce C
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Martin R, NRR/DORL/LPLII-1, 415-1493
References
CAC MF8176, CAC MF8177, CAC MF8178, CAC MF8179, CAC MF8180, CAC MF8181, CAC MF8210, CAC MF8211, CAC MF8212, CAC MF8213
Download: ML16257A646 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Martin, Robert Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 8:04 AM To: 'crpierce@southernco.com' <crpierce@southernco.com>

Cc: 'McElroy, G. Ken' <GKMCELRO@southernco.com>

Subject:

Acceptance Review - TSTF 545 for SNC Plants On July 28, 2016, Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC) submitted a License Amendment Request (LAR) (ADAMS ML16214A252) for Farley, Hatch and Vogtle, Units 1 and 2, to Revise Technical Specifications (TS) to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, "TS lnservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing." and for Farley and Vogtle, Units 1 and 2, also submitted a proposed Alternative to the ASME Code. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of these licensing actions. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Regarding the LAR portion of the submittal, consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including TS) must fully describe the changes requested, and following, as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

Regarding the proposed Alternative, pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364; 50-321 and 50-366; 50-424 and 50-425 CAC Nos MF8176 - MF8181 and MF8210 - MF8213

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16257A646&oldid=2016987"