ML16098A144: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16098A144
| number = ML16098A144
| issue date = 04/15/2016
| issue date = 04/15/2016
| title = Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information (CAC Nos. Mf6985 and Mf6986)
| title = Request for Additional Information
| author name = Orenak M D
| author name = Orenak M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Pierce C R
| addressee name = Pierce C
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| docket = 05000321, 05000366
| docket = 05000321, 05000366
| license number = DPR-057, NPF-005
| license number = DPR-057, NPF-005
| contact person = Orenak M D
| contact person = Orenak M
| case reference number = CAC MF6985, CAC MF6986
| case reference number = CAC MF6985, CAC MF6986
| document type = Letter, Request for Additional Information (RAI)
| document type = Letter, Request for Additional Information (RAI)
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
| revision = 0
| project = CAC:MF6985, CAC:MF6986
| stage = RAI
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 April 15, 2016 Mr. C. R. Pierce Regulatory Affairs Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
P. 0. Box 1295/Bin - 038 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295
==SUBJECT:==
EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CAC NOS. MF6985 AND MF6986)
==Dear Mr. Pierce:==
By letter dated October 15, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML15288A528 and ML16076A219, respectively), Southern Nuclear Operating Company submitted a license amendment request for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant (HNP), Units 1 and 2. The proposed license amendment request would revise HNP Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirements 3.6.4.1.3 to increase the allowable time for the Standby Gas Treatment System to draw down the secondary containment to negative pressure from 2 minutes to 10 minutes.
Upon reviewing the March 16, 2016 supplement, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that further information is needed to complete its review. The information request is included in the attached document. Please provide your response within 30 days of the date of this letter.
Sincerely, ft!h,) ~
Michael D. Orenak, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.: 50-321 and 50-366
==Enclosure:==
As stated cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CHANGES TO SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT 3.6.4.1.3 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, INC.
DOCKET NOS. 50-321 AND 50-366 By letter dated October 15, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML15288A528 and ML16076A219, respectively), Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC, or the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant (HNP), Units 1 and 2.
The proposed license amendment request would revise HNP Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.6.4.1.3 to increase the allowable time for the standby gas treatment system (SGTS) to draw down the secondary containment to negative pressure from 2 minutes to 10 minutes.
Upon reviewing the March 16, 2016, supplement, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that the following information is needed to complete its review.
RAl-10 In the response to RAl-7 of the March 16, 2016, supplement, SNC states:
This reduction was justified by noting that wind speeds of greater than 24 mph are not frequent, based on Plant Hatch meteorological conditions. At this wind speed, exfiltration would occur at 0.12 inches of water vacuum.
a) Please provide further detail as to what "exfiltration would occur at 0.12 inches of water vacuum" means. Does it mean that the exfiltration would not occur at 0.125 inches of water vacuum with 24 mph winds?
b) Please provide the basis for the required 0.12 inches of water vacuum with 24 mph wind speed in the form of a one-page summary of the test or analysis.
Enclosure
ML16098A144                                          *via memo OFFICE        NRR/LPLll-1/PM            NRR/LPLll-1/LA        NRR/SCVB/BC NAME          MOrenak                  SFigueroa              RDennig DATE          04/14/16                  04/07/16              04/14/16 OFFICE        NRR/LPLll-1/BC            NRR/LPLll-1/PM NAME          MMarkely                  MOrenak DATE          04/14/16                  04/15/16}}

Latest revision as of 04:00, 19 March 2020

Request for Additional Information
ML16098A144
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/15/2016
From: Michael Orenak
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Pierce C
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Orenak M
References
CAC MF6985, CAC MF6986
Download: ML16098A144 (3)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 April 15, 2016 Mr. C. R. Pierce Regulatory Affairs Director Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

P. 0. Box 1295/Bin - 038 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295

SUBJECT:

EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CAC NOS. MF6985 AND MF6986)

Dear Mr. Pierce:

By letter dated October 15, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML15288A528 and ML16076A219, respectively), Southern Nuclear Operating Company submitted a license amendment request for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant (HNP), Units 1 and 2. The proposed license amendment request would revise HNP Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirements 3.6.4.1.3 to increase the allowable time for the Standby Gas Treatment System to draw down the secondary containment to negative pressure from 2 minutes to 10 minutes.

Upon reviewing the March 16, 2016 supplement, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that further information is needed to complete its review. The information request is included in the attached document. Please provide your response within 30 days of the date of this letter.

Sincerely, ft!h,) ~

Michael D. Orenak, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.: 50-321 and 50-366

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/enclosure: Distribution via Listserv

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CHANGES TO SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT 3.6.4.1.3 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, INC.

DOCKET NOS. 50-321 AND 50-366 By letter dated October 15, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated March 16, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML15288A528 and ML16076A219, respectively), Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC, or the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant (HNP), Units 1 and 2.

The proposed license amendment request would revise HNP Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.6.4.1.3 to increase the allowable time for the standby gas treatment system (SGTS) to draw down the secondary containment to negative pressure from 2 minutes to 10 minutes.

Upon reviewing the March 16, 2016, supplement, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that the following information is needed to complete its review.

RAl-10 In the response to RAl-7 of the March 16, 2016, supplement, SNC states:

This reduction was justified by noting that wind speeds of greater than 24 mph are not frequent, based on Plant Hatch meteorological conditions. At this wind speed, exfiltration would occur at 0.12 inches of water vacuum.

a) Please provide further detail as to what "exfiltration would occur at 0.12 inches of water vacuum" means. Does it mean that the exfiltration would not occur at 0.125 inches of water vacuum with 24 mph winds?

b) Please provide the basis for the required 0.12 inches of water vacuum with 24 mph wind speed in the form of a one-page summary of the test or analysis.

Enclosure

ML16098A144 *via memo OFFICE NRR/LPLll-1/PM NRR/LPLll-1/LA NRR/SCVB/BC NAME MOrenak SFigueroa RDennig DATE 04/14/16 04/07/16 04/14/16 OFFICE NRR/LPLll-1/BC NRR/LPLll-1/PM NAME MMarkely MOrenak DATE 04/14/16 04/15/16

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16098A144&oldid=2629267"