ML21137A183: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 13:38, 19 January 2022
ML21137A183 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Davis Besse |
Issue date: | 02/18/2021 |
From: | Gregory Roach NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
To: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
Roach G | |
Shared Package | |
ML20136A251 | List: |
References | |
L-20-236 | |
Download: ML21137A183 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the NRC developed Written Examination Outline sent to the Facility ONLY Facility: Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station Date of Examination: February 2021 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
- 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401. CDZ N/A GMR W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with CDZ N/A GMR R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
I T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. CDZ N/A GMR T
E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. CDZ N/A GMR N
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients.
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
O
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test, of ES-301 (including overlap).
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s).
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R O b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N
- c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
Printed Name/Signature Date Charles D. Zoia / Charles D. Zoia 3/3/20 Digitally signed by Charles D. Zoia
- a. Author Date: 2020.11.27 05:56:34 -06'00'
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) N/A N/A
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Gregory M. Roach, Jr. / Gregory M. Roach Digitally signed by Gregory M. Roach Date: 2020.11.24 15:14:18 -06'00' 3/3/20
- d. NRC Supervisor Patricia J. Pelke / Patricia J. Pelke Digitally signed by Patricia J. Pelke Date: 2021.05.14 14:01:13 -05'00' 3/4/20
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; the chief examiners concurrence is required.