ML20147D454: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 30: Line 30:
(Skagit Nuclear Power Project,                          )
(Skagit Nuclear Power Project,                          )
Units 1 and 2)                                      )
Units 1 and 2)                                      )
NRC STAFF'S RESPONSE TO INTERVENORS' SCANP MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, by letter dated August 23,1978, from Samuel W. Jensch, Chairman, gave the parties until September 22,1978, to respond to whether it objected to incorporating portions of the Perkins record regarding the issue of radon-222 and the resulting environmental health effects of the uranium fuel cycle into the record of this proceeding , On September 22, 1978, Intervenor SCANP filed a motion for extension of time on the grounds that (1) it is still reviewing the voluminous Perkins record, and (2) it is considering consolidating with the intervenors in Sterling on the radon-222 issue before the Appeal Board. Accordingly , SCANP requested an extension of time until Novem-
NRC STAFF'S RESPONSE TO INTERVENORS' SCANP MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, by {{letter dated|date=August 23, 1978|text=letter dated August 23,1978}}, from Samuel W. Jensch, Chairman, gave the parties until September 22,1978, to respond to whether it objected to incorporating portions of the Perkins record regarding the issue of radon-222 and the resulting environmental health effects of the uranium fuel cycle into the record of this proceeding , On September 22, 1978, Intervenor SCANP filed a motion for extension of time on the grounds that (1) it is still reviewing the voluminous Perkins record, and (2) it is considering consolidating with the intervenors in Sterling on the radon-222 issue before the Appeal Board. Accordingly , SCANP requested an extension of time until Novem-
                       ,                                  .j-ber 3,1978 in cruer to respond to this issue.
                       ,                                  .j-ber 3,1978 in cruer to respond to this issue.
Since there appear to be outstanding contentions regarding the radon-222 issue before the Appeal Board on the Sterling docket, the NRC Staff believes sufficient 7 8 i 9h i dHf>D3                                                        .
Since there appear to be outstanding contentions regarding the radon-222 issue before the Appeal Board on the Sterling docket, the NRC Staff believes sufficient 7 8 i 9h i dHf>D3                                                        .

Latest revision as of 03:23, 12 December 2021

NRC Staff'S Response to Intervenor'S Scanp Motion for Extension of Time.No Outstanding Contentions Re radon-222, & No Objection to Motion for Extension of Time.W/Att Cert of SVC
ML20147D454
Person / Time
Site: Skagit
Issue date: 10/03/1978
From: Black R
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To:
References
NUDOCS 7810140073
Download: ML20147D454 (4)


Text

. _ _ - _

10/03/78 {

~

NRC PUBLIC DOCUMENT ROOM p l N

cocu m j d usnac UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2 4 4 OCT 41978> r BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENGING BOARD o$"l*1"sgf

)

t, In the Matter of ) F

)

PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT ) Docket Nos. STN 50-522 COMPANY, ET AL. ) <

STN 50-523

)

(Skagit Nuclear Power Project, )

Units 1 and 2) )

NRC STAFF'S RESPONSE TO INTERVENORS' SCANP MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, by letter dated August 23,1978, from Samuel W. Jensch, Chairman, gave the parties until September 22,1978, to respond to whether it objected to incorporating portions of the Perkins record regarding the issue of radon-222 and the resulting environmental health effects of the uranium fuel cycle into the record of this proceeding , On September 22, 1978, Intervenor SCANP filed a motion for extension of time on the grounds that (1) it is still reviewing the voluminous Perkins record, and (2) it is considering consolidating with the intervenors in Sterling on the radon-222 issue before the Appeal Board. Accordingly , SCANP requested an extension of time until Novem-

, .j-ber 3,1978 in cruer to respond to this issue.

Since there appear to be outstanding contentions regarding the radon-222 issue before the Appeal Board on the Sterling docket, the NRC Staff believes sufficient 7 8 i 9h i dHf>D3 .

  • 'l * '9 9 8"T"f 7* tre ~atyw.egr ppig,,wy g. - gemipes, 7 men.grym;9q 4 rep puyyi.p rhy 7 ,<**ea ,_, - p yg,vuepg

1

's /

good cause for the requested extension exists. Therefore, c have no objection to this motion for an extension of time.

Respectfully submitted, N /a w( .

6 h' Ri, chard L . S ack Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 3rd of October,1978 l

1

..y

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING B0nRD In the Matter of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT Docket Nos. STN 50-522 COMPANY, El A . 1 STN 50-523

)

(Skagit Nuclear Power Project, )

Units 1 and 2) ) ,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of "NRC STAFFiS RESPONSE TO INTERVENORS' SCANP MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME" in the abavc-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, or, as indi-cated by an asterisk, through deposit in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's internal mail system, this 3rd day of October,1978:

Samuel W. Jensch, Esq. , Chairman

  • Robert C. Schofield, director Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Skagit County Planning Department U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 120 W. Kincaid Street Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 Dr. Frank F. Hooper, Member Roger M. Leed, Esq. '

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 1411 Fourth Avenue School of Natural Resources Seattle, Washington 98101 University of Michigan  ;

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Mr. Nicholas D. Lewis Chairman Mr. Gustave A. Linenberger, Member

  • Washington State Energy Facility Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Site Evaluation Council U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 820 East Fifth Avenue Washington, D. C. 20555 01-  % , Washington 98504 Robert Lowenstein, Esq. F . ', . adore Thomsen, Esq.

Lowenstein, Newman, Reis Perkins, Coie, Stone, Olsen

& Axelrad & Williams Suite 1214 .

1900 Washington Building 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Seattle, Washington 98101-Washington, D.C. 20036 Richard D. Bach, Esq.

Mr. Lloyd K. Marbet Rives, Bonyhadi & Drummond c/o Forelaws on Board -

1400 Public Service Building 19142 S. Bakers Ferry Road ~ 920 S.W. 6th Avenue Boring, Oregon 97009 Portland, Oregon 97204 [

m f

I

, . 1 Richard M. Sandvik, Esq. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board State of Oregon Panel

  • s /

Department of Justice U.S. Nuclear Re:.ilatory Commission 500 Pacific Building Washington, D.C. 20555 520 S.W. Yamhill Portland, Oregon 97204 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (5)*

Canadian Consulate General U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Robert Graham Washington, D.C., 20555 Vice-Consul 412 Plaza 600 Docketing and Service Section (3) 6th & Stewart Street Office of the Secretary Seattle, Washington 98101 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Donald W. Godard, Supervisor Siting and Regulation Department of Energy Room 111, Labor and Industries Building Salem, Oregon 97310

/

Russell W. Busch, Esq.

Attorney for Upper Skagit Indian Tribe and Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe Evergreen Legal Services 5308 Ballard Avenue, N.W.

Seattle, Washington 98107 .

NC Ricah rd L. Blac Counsel for N Staff 1

.~..,,,,.g